Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • This chapter is unavailable for purchase
  • Cited by 17
  • Print publication year: 2006
  • Online publication date: June 2012

33 - Expertise in History

from PART V.C - GAMES AND OTHER TYPES OF EXPERTISE

Summary

Overviews of Expertise and of History

Expertise

Expertise, studied in a variety of domains, has referred to highly skilled performance in an activity such as violin playing or playing chess. Expertise has referred also to a person's knowledge and/or ability to perform representational tasks of a particular domain. The term also may be based on a reputation established by publications and/or lectures, or on a “certification” such as a PhD. In the present context, an expert in history is assumed to have a general and a specialized knowledge of history as well as facility in the skills of historical research and writing.

Although the study of expertise began in the late nineteenth century, the primary impetus occurred in the late twentieth century with the work on chess by de Groot (1965) and Chase and Simon (1973a, 1973b). This research, comparing expert, middle-range, and novice performance, demonstrated the importance of recognizing functionally related “chunks” of chess pieces. Similarly, physics experts were superior to novices in their conceptual understanding of physics problems, which in turn led to their better problem solving (Chi, Feltovich, & Glaser, 1981; Larkin, McDermott, Simon, & Simon, 1980).

The nature of expertise in any domain involves an interaction of a person's knowledge (both domain-specific and general) and skills, and the characteristics of the domain that constrain performance. Some domains, because of their conceptual evolution, permit the use of mathematics, formal logic, or well-controlled experimentation.

References
Aristotle, (1954). The Rhetoric and the Poetics of Aristotle. (Roberts, W. R. & Bywater, I., Eds. & Trans.). New York: Modern Library.
Barton, K. (2001). A socio-cultural perspective on children's understanding of historical change: Comparative findings from Northern Ireland and the United States. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 881–913.
Breslauer, G. W. (1996). Counterfactual reasoning in western studies of Soviet Politics and Foreign Relations. In Tetlock, P. & Belkin, A. (Eds.), Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics (pp. 71–94). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Carretero, M., Jacott, L., & Lopez-Manjon, A. (2002). Learning history through textbooks: Are Mexican and Spanish students taught the same story? Learning and Instruction, 12, 651–665.
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973a). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55–81.
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973b). The mind's eye in chess. In Chase, W. G. (Ed.), Visual Information Processing (pp. 216–281). London: Academic Press.
Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152.
Cronon, W. (1992). A place for stories: Nature, history, and narrative. Journal of American History, 78, 1347–1376.
Groot, A. D. (1965). Thought and Choice in Chess. The Hague: Mouton.
Dray, W. (1957). Laws and Explanation in History. London: Oxford University Press.
Ericsson, K. A., & Lehmann, A. C. (1996). Expert and exceptional performance: evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 273–305.
Epstein, T. (1998). Deconstructing differences in African American and European American adolescents' perspectives on United States history. Curriculum Inquiry, 28, 397–423.
Getzels, J. W. (1979). Problem finding: A theoretical note. Cognitive Science, 3, 167–172.
Hempel, C. (1942). The function of general laws in history. The Journal of Philosophy, 39, 35–48.
Herodotus, (1987). The History. (D. Grene, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Holsti, O., & Rosenau, J. N. (1977). The meaning of Vietnam: Belief systems of American leaders. International Journal, 32, 452–474.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction–integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182.
Larkin, J. H., McDermott, J., Simon, D., & Simon, H. (1980). Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science, 208, 140–156.
Leinhardt, G., Stainton, C., & Virji, S. M. (1994). A sense of history. Educational Psychologist, 29, 79–88.
Leinhardt, G., Stainton, C., Virji, S. M., & Odoroff, E. (1994). Learning to reason in history: Mindlessness to mindfulness. In Carretero, M. & Voss, J. F. (Eds.), Cognitive and Instructional Processes in History and the Social Sciences (pp. 131–158). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Leinhardt, G., & Young, K. (1996). Two texts, three readers: Distance and expertise in reading history. Cognition and Instruction, 14(4), 441–486.
Lemon, M. C. (2003). Philosophy of History. New York: Routledge.
Levine, L. W. (1989). The unpredictable past: Reflection on recent American historiography. The American Historical Review, 94(1), 671–679.
Lowenthal, D. (2000). Dilemmas and delights of learning history. In Stearns, P. N., Seixas, P., & Wineburg, S. (Eds.), Knowing, Teaching & Learning History (pp. 63–82). New York and London: New York University Press.
Mackie, J. L. (1965). Causes and conditions. American Philosophical Quarterly, 2, 245–264.
McGuire, M. (1990). The rhetoric of narrative: A hermeneutic critical theory. In Britton, B. K. & Pellegrini, A. D. (Eds.), Narrative Thought and Narrative Language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mink, L. O. (1987). Historical Understanding. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Newell, A. (1980). One final word. In Tuma, D. T. & Reif, F. (Eds.), Problem Solving and Education: Issues in Teaching and Research (pp. 175–189). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. (John Wilkinson & Purcell Weaver, Trans.) Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Ringer, F. K. (1989). Causal analysis in historical reasoning. History and Theory, 28, 154–172.
Rouet, J-F, Favart, M., Britt, A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1997). Studying and using multiple documents in history: Effects of discipline expertise. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 85–106.
Schooler, T. Y. E., Kennet, J., Wiley, J., & Voss, J. F. (1996). On the processing of political editorials. In Kreuz, R. J. & MacNealy, M. S. (Eds.), Empirical Approaches to Literature and Aesthetics (pp. 445–459). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Schum, D. A. (1993). Argument structuring and evidence evaluation. In Hastie, R. (Ed.), Inside the Juror (pp. 175–191). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stearns, P. N. (1998). Goals in history teaching. In Voss, J. F. & Carretero, M. (Eds.), Learning and Reasoning in History (pp. 281–293). London: Woburn Press.
Tetlock, P. E., & Belkin, A. (Eds.). (1996). Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Theory-driven reasoning about possible pasts and probable futures: Are we prisoners of our preconceptions? American Journal of Political Science, 43, 335–366.
Thucydides, (1954). History of the Peloponnesian War. New York: Penguin.
Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tulviste, P., & Wertsch, J. V. (1994). Official and unofficial histories: The case of Estonia. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 4, 311–329.
Tweney, R. D. (1991). Informal reasoning in science. In Voss, J. F., Perkins, D. N., & Segel, J. A. (Eds.), Informal Reasoning and Education (pp. 3–16). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Voss, J. F., Carretero, M., Kennet, J., & Silfies, L. N. (1994). The collapse of the Soviet Union: A case study in causal reasoning. In Carretero, M. & Voss, J. F. (Eds.), Cognitive and Instructional Processes in History and the Social Sciences (pp. 403–429). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Voss, J. F., Greene, T. R., Post, T. A., & Penner, B.C. (1983). Problem-solving skill in the social sciences. In Bower, G. H. (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 17 (pp. 165–213). New York: Academic Press.
Voss, J. F. & Post, T. A. (1988) On the solving of ill-structured problems. In Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. I. (Eds.), The Nature of Expertise (pp. 261–285). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Voss, J. F., Wiley, J., & Carretero, M. (1995). Acquiring intellectual skills. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 155–181.
Voss, J. F., Wiley, J., & Sandak, R. (1999). On the use of narrative as argument. In Goldman, S. R., Graesser, A. C., & Broek, P. (Eds.), Narrative Comprehension, Causality, and Coherence: Essays in Honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 235–252). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wertsch, J. V., & Rozin, M. (1998). The Russian Revolution: Official and unofficial accounts. In Voss, J. F. & Carretero, M. (Eds.), Learning and Reasoning in History (pp. 39–60). London: Woburn Press.
White, H. (1987). The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Wineburg, S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 73–87.
Wineburg, S. (1994). The cognitive representation of historical texts. In Leinhardt, G., Beck, I., & Stainton, C. (Eds.), Teaching and Learning in History (pp. 85–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wineburg, S. (1998). Reading Abraham Lincoln: An expert/expert study in the interpretation of historical texts. Cognitive Science, 22, 319–346.