Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T04:37:01.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

27 - The Enigmatic Urge

How Sexual Desire Works

from Part VII - Sexual Selection and Human Sex Differences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2020

Lance Workman
Affiliation:
University of South Wales
Will Reader
Affiliation:
Sheffield Hallam University
Jerome H. Barkow
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia
Get access

Summary

This chapter explores how motivation theory (Chapter 15) set into an evolutionary framework can illuminate sexual desire. As implied by its title, some features of sexual desire appear to be enigmatic. However, a study of the combination of causal processes and evolutionary psychology can make them less so.

Examples of enigmatic and seemingly inexplicable features of sexual desire are to be found at numerous points along the wide spectrum of sexual responses that people exhibit. These range from something all-embracing and even addictive, including homicidal sex-linked violence, through to the absence of desire: asexuality. Some men spend hours absorbed in the biologically nonfunctional activity of watching child pornography, thereby risking their freedom, marriages, and careers. Others require a fetish object, such as rubber, to be present in order to feel sexual desire.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anselme, P. (2010). The uncertainty processing theory of motivation. Behavioural Brain Research, 208(2), 291310.Google Scholar
Antfolk, J., Salo, B., Alanko, K., et al. (2015). Women’s and men’s sexual preferences and activities with respect to the partner’s age: Evidence for female choice. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(1), 7379.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. D., & Baldwin, J. I. (1997). Gender differences in sexual interest. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26(2), 181210.Google Scholar
Banca, P., Morris, L. S., Mitchell, S., et al. (2016). Novelty, conditioning and attentional bias to sexual rewards. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 72, 91101.Google Scholar
Bargh, J. A., Raymond, P., Pryor, J. B., & Strack, F. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power → sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(5), 768781.Google Scholar
Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992) The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Basson, R., Leiblum, S., Brotto, L., et al. (2003). Definitions of women’s sexual dysfunction reconsidered: Advocating expansion and revision. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 24(4), 221229.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Gender differences in erotic plasticity: The female sex drive as socially flexible and responsive. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 347374.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Catanese, K. R., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Is there a gender difference in strength of sex drive? Theoretical views, conceptual distinctions, and a review of relevant evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(3), 242273.Google Scholar
Belsky, J., Steinberg, L., Houts, R. M., & Halpern-Felsher, B. L. (2010). The development of reproductive strategy in females: Early maternal harshness → earlier menarche → increased sexual risk taking. Developmental Psychology, 46(1), 120128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berridge, K. C. (2001). Reward learning: Reinforcement, incentives, and expectations. In Medin, D. L., ed., Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, Vol. 40. New York: Academic Press, pp. 223278.Google Scholar
Berridge, K. C. (2004). Motivation concepts in behavioral neuroscience. Physiology & Behavior, 81(2), 179209.Google Scholar
Bindra, D. (1978). How adaptive behavior is produced: A perceptual–motivational alternative to response reinforcements. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 4152.Google Scholar
Binter, J., Leongómez, J. D., Moyano, N., et al. (2012). Sex differences in the incidence of sexual fantasies focused on evolutionary relevant objects. Anthropologie, 50(1), 8393.Google Scholar
Bjorklund, D. F., & Kipp, K. (1996). Parental investment theory and gender differences in the evolution of inhibition mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 120(2), 163188.Google Scholar
Bogaert, A. F. (2015). Asexuality: What it is and why it matters. Journal of Sex Research, 52(4), 362379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boothroyd, L. G., Meins, E., Vukovic, J., & Burt, D. M. (2014). Developmental changes in children’s facial preferences. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(5), 376383.Google Scholar
Brand, M., Snagowski, J., Laier, C., & Maderwald, S. (2016). Ventral striatum activity when watching preferred pornographic pictures is correlated with symptoms of Internet pornography addiction. NeuroImage, 129, 224232.Google Scholar
Buss, D. (2015). Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind. Hove: The Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological Science, 3(4), 251255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A. (2013). A Mind of Her Own: The Evolutionary Psychology of Women. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 183204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chivers, M. L. (2017). The specificity of women’s sexual response and its relationship with sexual orientations: A review and ten hypotheses. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(5), 11611179.Google Scholar
Dewitte, M. (2015). Gender differences in liking and wanting sex: Examining the role of motivational context and implicit versus explicit processing. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(6), 16631674.Google Scholar
Dhuffar, M. K., & Griffiths, M. D. (2015). Understanding conceptualisations of female sex addiction and recovery using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Psychology Research, 5(10), 585603.Google Scholar
Diamond, L. M. (2012). The desire disorder in research on sexual orientation in women: Contributions of dynamical systems theory. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(1), 7383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickson, N., Paul, C., Herbison, P., & Silva, P. (1998). First sexual intercourse: Age, coercion, and later regrets reported by a birth cohort. British Medical Journal, 316(7124), 2933.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doom, J. R., Vanzomeren-Dohm, A. A., & Simpson, J. A. (2016). Early unpredictability predicts increased adolescent externalizing behaviors and substance use: A life history perspective. Development and Psychopathology, 28(4 Pt 2), 15051516.Google Scholar
Ellis, B. J., & Symons, D. (1990). Sex differences in sexual fantasy: An evolutionary psychological approach. Journal of Sex Research, 27(4), 527555.Google Scholar
Ellis, B. J., Del Giudice, M., Dishion, T. J., et al. (2012). The evolutionary basis of risky adolescent behavior: Implications for science, policy, and practice. Developmental Psychology, 48(3), 598623.Google Scholar
Felson, R. B., & Cundiff, P. R. (2012). Age and sexual assault during robberies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 13, 1016.Google Scholar
Felson, R. B., & Cundiff, P. R. (2014). Sexual assault as a crime against young people. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 273284Google Scholar
Fleischman, D. S., Hamilton, L. D., Fessler, D. M., & Meston, C. M. (2015). Disgust versus lust: Exploring the interactions of disgust and fear with sexual arousal in women. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0118151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galperin, A., Haselton, M. G., Frederick, D. A., et al. (2013). Sexual regret: Evidence for evolved sex differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(7), 11451161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(4), 573587.Google Scholar
Gillath, O., & Collins, T. (2016). Unconscious desire: The affective and motivational aspects of subliminal sexual priming. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(1), 520.Google Scholar
Glass, S. P., & Wright, T. L. (1985). Sex differences in type of extramarital involvement and marital dissatisfaction. Sex Roles, 12(9–10), 11011120.Google Scholar
Goldenberg, D., Telzer, E. H., Lieberman, M. D., Fuligni, A., & Galván, A. (2013). Neural mechanisms of impulse control in sexually risky adolescents. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 2329.Google Scholar
Guggino, J. M., & Ponzetti, J. J. Jr. (1997). Gender differences in affective reactions to first coitus. Journal of Adolescence, 20(2), 189200.Google Scholar
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814834.Google Scholar
Hall, J. L., Stanton, S. J., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2010). Biopsychological and neural processes of implicit motivation. In Schultheiss, O. & Brunstein, J. C., eds., Implicit Motives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 279307.Google Scholar
Hosseini-Kamkar, N., & Morton, J. B. (2014). Sex differences in self-regulation: An evolutionary perspective. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, 233.Google Scholar
Hyde, J. S. (1996). Where are the gender differences? Where are the gender similarities? In Buss, D. M. & Malamuth, N. M., eds., Sex, Power, Conflict: Evolutionary and Feminist Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 107118.Google Scholar
Janssen, E., & Bancroft, J. (2007). The dual-control model: The role of sexual inhibition and excitation in sexual arousal and behavior. In Janssen, E., ed., The Psychophysiology of Sex. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 197222.Google Scholar
Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15(1), 7591.Google Scholar
Kenrick, D. T., Groth, G. E., Trost, M. R., & Sadalla, E. K. (1993). Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: Effects of gender, self-appraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(6), 951969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoth, R., Boyd, K., & Singer, B. (1988). Empirical tests of sexual selection theory: Predictions of sex differences in onset, intensity, and time course of sexual arousal. Journal of Sex Research, 24(1), 7389.Google Scholar
Knott, V., Impey, D., Fisher, D., Delpero, E., & Fedoroff, P. (2016). Pedophilic brain potential responses to adult erotic stimuli. Brain Research, 1632, 127140.Google Scholar
Laan, E., & Both, S. (2008). What makes women experience desire? Feminism & Psychology, 18(4), 505514.Google Scholar
Laan, E., & Janssen, E. (2007). How do men and women feel? Determinants of subjective experience of sexual arousal. In Janssen, E., ed., The Psychophysiology of Sex. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 278290.Google Scholar
LeDoux, J. (1999). The Emotional Brain. London: Phoenix.Google Scholar
Leitenberg, H., & Henning, K. (1995). Sexual fantasy. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 469496.Google Scholar
Levin, R. J., & van Berlo, W. (2004). Sexual arousal and orgasm in subjects who experience forced or non-consensual sexual stimulation – A review. Journal of Clinical and Forensic Medicine, 11, 8286.Google Scholar
Lippa, R. A. (2006). Is high sex drive associated with increased sexual attraction to both sexes? It depends on whether you are male or female. Psychological Science, 17(1), 4652.Google Scholar
Lomanowska, A. M., Lovic, V., Rankine, M. J., et al. (2011). Inadequate early social experience increases the incentive salience of reward-related cues in adulthood. Behavioural Brain Research, 220(1), 9199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacLean, P. D. (1990). The Triune Brain in Evolution. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
McClintock, M. K., & Herdt, G. (1996). Rethinking puberty: The development of sexual attraction. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5(6), 178183.Google Scholar
McKeague, E. L. (2014). Differentiating the female sex addict: A literature review focused on themes of gender difference used to inform recommendations for treating women with sex addiction. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 21(3), 203224.Google Scholar
Meana, M. (2010) Elucidating women’s (hetero)sexual desire: Definitional challenges and content expansion. Journal of Sex Research, 47, 104122.Google Scholar
Meston, C. M., & Buss, D. M. (2007). Why humans have sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(4), 477507.Google Scholar
Meyer-Bahlburg, H. F., Ehrhardt, A. A., Rosen, L. R., et al. (1995). Prenatal estrogens and the development of homosexual orientation. Developmental Psychology, 31(1), 1221.Google Scholar
Money, J. (1986). Lovemaps. New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
Palmer, C. T. (1988). Twelve reasons why rape is not sexually motivated: A skeptical examination. Journal of Sex Research, 25(4), 512530.Google Scholar
Phillips, B., Hajela, R., & Hilton, D. L. Jr. (2015). Sex addiction as a disease: Evidence for assessment, diagnosis, and response to critics. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 22(2), 167192.Google Scholar
Pruitt, D., & LaFont, S. (1995). For love and money: Romance tourism in Jamaica. Annals of Tourism Research, 22(2), 422440.Google Scholar
Pruitt, M. V., & Krull, A. C. (2011). Escort advertisements and male patronage of prostitutes. Deviant Behavior, 32(1), 3863.Google Scholar
Quinsey, V. L. (2003). The etiology of anomalous sexual preferences in men. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989(1), 105117.Google Scholar
Rademacher, L., Schulte-Rüther, M., Hanewald, B., & Lammertz, S. (2017). Reward: From basic reinforcers to anticipation of social cues. Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences, 30, 207221.Google Scholar
Radtke, S. (2013). Sexual fluidity in women: How feminist research influenced evolutionary studies of same-sex behavior. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 7(4), 336343.Google Scholar
Reynaud, M., Karila, L., Blecha, L., & Benyamina, A. (2010). Is love passion an addictive disorder? American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 36(5), 261267.Google Scholar
Rubio-Casillas, A., Rodríguez-Quintero, C. M., Rodríguez-Manzo, G., & Fernández-Guasti, A. (2015). Unraveling the modulatory actions of serotonin on male rat sexual responses. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 55, 234246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, R. M., Mendle, J., & Markowitz, A. J. (2015). Early childhood maltreatment and girls’ sexual behavior: The mediating role of pubertal timing. Journal of Adolescent Health, 57(3), 342347.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P. (2003). Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: Tests from 52 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(1), 85104.Google Scholar
Schneider, J. P. (2000). A qualitative study of cybersex participants: Gender differences, recovery issues, and implications for therapists. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 7, 249278.Google Scholar
Shulman, E. P., Smith, A. R., Silva, K., et al. (2016). The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 103117.Google Scholar
Snowden, R. J., Curl, C., Jobbins, K., Lavington, C., & Gray, N. S. (2016). Automatic direction of spatial attention to male versus female stimuli: A comparison of heterosexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(4), 843853.Google Scholar
Steinberg, L. (2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Review, 28(1), 78106.Google Scholar
Symons, D. (1979). The Evolution of Human Sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Takahashi, H., Matsuura, M., Yahata, N., et al. (2006). Men and women show distinct brain activations during imagery of sexual and emotional infidelity. NeuroImage, 32(3), 12991307.Google Scholar
Telzer, E. H. (2016). Dopaminergic reward sensitivity can promote adolescent health: A new perspective on the mechanism of ventral striatum activation. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 5767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thornhill, N. W. (1996). Psychological adaptation to sexual coercion in victims and offenders. In Buss, D. M. & Malamuth, N. M., eds., Sex, Power, Conflict: Evolutionary and Feminist Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 90104.Google Scholar
Tidwell, N. D., & Eastwick, P. W. (2013). Sex differences in succumbing to sexual temptations: A function of impulse or control? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 16201633.Google Scholar
Tiefer, L. (1991). Historical, scientific, clinical and feminist criticisms of “the human sexual response cycle” model. Annual Review of Sex Research, 2(1), 123.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, N. (1951). The Study of Instinct. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Toates, F. (1986). Motivational Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Toates, F. (2006). A model of the hierarchy of behaviour, cognition, and consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 15(1), 75118.Google Scholar
Toates, F. (2014). How Sexual Desire Works: The Enigmatic Urge. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Toates, F. (2017). A hierarchical model might cast some light on the anomaly. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(5), 12031205.Google Scholar
Tolman, D. L., & Diamond, L. M. (2001). Desegregating sexuality research: Cultural and biological perspectives on gender and desire. Annual Review of Sex Research, 12, 3374.Google Scholar
Townsend, J. M. (1998). What Women Want – What Men Want. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Townsend, J. M., & Wasserman, T. (1997). The perception of sexual attractiveness: Sex differences in variability. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26(3), 243268.Google Scholar
Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., & Griskevicius, V. (2009). Microbes, mating, and morality: Individual differences in three functional domains of disgust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 103122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., Kurzban, R., & DeScioli, P. (2013). Disgust: Evolved function and structure. Psychological Review, 120(1), 6584.Google Scholar
Victor, E. C., & Hariri, A. R. (2016). A neuroscience perspective on sexual risk behavior in adolescence and emerging adulthood. Development and Psychopathology, 28(2), 471487.Google Scholar
Workman, L., & Reader, W. (2014). Evolutionary Psychology, 3rd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×