Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 3
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: February 2015

Chapter 7 - Professional Engineering Work

Summary

Introduction

The focus of our chapter is on current research-based understandings of professional engineering work. We argue for the relevance of these understandings to engineering education. We will also argue, as others have as well (Barley, 2004; Trevelyan, 2007, 2010; Vinck, 2003), that research on professional engineering work is too sparse. Therefore a good part of this chapter is oriented in a programmatic, agenda setting direction.

From the perspective of engineering education, the sparseness of research on professional engineering work is puzzling for a number of reasons. First, engineering education is often reorganized against the backdrop of claims about what professional engineering work is now or will be in the future. Without trustworthy and specific representations of engineering work practice and of the dispositions, skills, and identity orientations of professional engineers, how are engineering educators to know whether engineering education is preparing engineering students to be successful, creative, or impactful engineers? A prominent consensus report from the National Academy of Engineering highlights a “disconnect between engineers in practice and engineers in academe” (National Academy of Engineering [NAE], 2005, pp. 20–21). The report stated that “the great majority of engineering faculty, for example, have no industry experience. Industry representatives point to this disconnect as the reason that engineering students are not adequately prepared, in their view, to enter today's workforce” (National Academy of Engineering [NAE], 2005, pp. 20–21). It is important that a focus on “preparation” of future engineers not be tied to an agenda that solely emphasizes what professional engineering “needs” and economic competitiveness. It also is possible to organize an engineering educational system to prepare recent graduates to be change agents and participants in new social movements within engineering work practice. However, in either case, concrete images of engineering work are critical resources for rethinking engineering education and making empirically based assessments of progress.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
References
Adams, R., Evangelou, D., English, L., De Figueireo, A. D., Mousoulides, N., Pawley, A. L.,…Wilson, D. M. (2011). Multiple perspectives on engaging future engineers. Journal of Engineering Education: Centennial Special Issue, 100(1), 48–88.
Anderson, K. J. B., Courter, S., McGlamery, T.Nathans-Kelley, T., & Nicometo, C. (2010). Understanding engineering work and identity: A cross-case analysis of engineers within six firms. Engineering Studies, 2(3), 153–174.
Aneesh, A. (2006). Virtual migration: The programming of globalization. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., & Saleem, J. (2007). Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 359–379.
Auyang, S. Y. (2004). Engineering: An endless frontier. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Barley, S. R. (2004). What we know (and mostly don't know) about technical work. In Ackroyd, S., Batt, R., Thompson, P., & Tolbert, P. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of work and organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blinder, A. S. (2006, March/April). Offshoring: The next Industrial Revolution? Foreign Affairs, 113–128.
Boland, R. J., Lyytinen, K., & Yoo, Y. (2007, July/August). Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction. Organization Science, 18, 631–647.
Brown, J. S. (2000, March/April). Growing up digital: How the Web changes work, education, and the ways people learn. Change.
Bucciarelli, L. (1988). An ethnographic perspective on engineering design. Design Studies, 9(3), 59–168.
Bucciarelli, L. L. (1994). Designing engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bucciarelli, L. L., & Kuhn, S. (1997). Engineering education and engineering practice: Improving the fit. In Barley, R. & Orr, J. E. (Eds.), Between craft and science: Technical work in U.S. settings. London: Cornell University Press.
Cuff, D. (1992). Architecture: The story of practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Downey, G. L. (1992). CAD/CAM saves the nation?: Toward an anthropology of technology. Knowledge and Society, 9, 143–168.
Downey, G. L., & Lucena, J. C. (2004). Knowledge and professional identity in engineering. History and Technology, 20(4), 393–420.
Downey, G. L., Lucena, J. C., Moskal, B. M., Parkhurst, R., Bigley, T., Hays, C.,…Nichols-Belo, A. (2006). The globally competent engineer: Working effectively with people who define problems differently. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 107–122.
Eisenhart, M. A., & Finkel, E. (1998). Women's science: Learning and succeeding from the margins. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Eraut, M. (2000). Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 113–136.
Faulkner, W. (2008). Nuts and bolts and people. Social Studies of Science, 37(3), 331–356.
Faulkner, W. (2009). Doing gender in engineering workplace cultures: Observations from the field. Engineering Studies, 1(1), 3–18.
Foor, C. E., Walden, S. E., & Trytten, D. A. (2008). “I wish that I belonged more in the whole engineering group:” Achieving individual diversity. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(2), 103–115.
Friesen, M. (2011). Immigrants’ integration and career development in the professional engineering workplace in the context of social and cultural capital. Engineering Studies, 3(2), 79–100.
Gainsburg, J., Rodriguez-Lluesma, C., & Bailey, D. E. (2010). A ‘knowledge profile’ of an engineering occupation: Temporal patterns in the use of engineering knowledge. Engineering Studies, 2(3), 197–220.
Goodwin, C., & Heritage, J. (1990). Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 283–307.
Greeno, J., & Hall, R. (1997). Practicing representation: Learning with and about representational forms. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 361–367.
Hall, R., & Stevens, R. (1995). Making space: A comparison of mathematical work at school and in professional design practice. In Star, S. L. (Ed.), Cultures of computing (pp. 118–145). London: Basil Blackwell.
Henderson, K. (1991). Flexible sketches and inflexible data bases: Visual communication, conscription devices, and boundary objects in design engineering. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 16(4), 448–473.
Henderson, K. (1999). On line and on paper: Visual representations, visual culture and computer graphics in design engineering. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hess, D. J., Breyman, S., Campbell, N., & Martin, B. (2007). Science, technology, and social movements. In Hackett, E. J., Amsterdamska, O., Lynch, M., & Wajcman, J. (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Holland, D. C., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Johri, A. (2010). Open organizing: Designing sustainable work practices for the engineering workforce. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(2), 278–286.
Johri, A. (2011). Sociomaterial Bricolage: The creation of location-spanning work practices by global software developers. Information and Software Technology, 53(9), 955–968.
Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Lee, C. B. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 139–151.
Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103.
Korte, R., Sheppard, S., & Jordan, W. (2008). A qualitative study of the early work experiences of recent graduates in engineering. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education, Pittsburgh, PA.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Law, J. (1987). Technology and heterogeneous engineering: The case of the Portuguese expansion. In Bijker, W., Hughes, T., & Pinch, T. (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems (pp. 111–134). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lynch, M., & Woolgar, S. (Eds.). (1990). Representation in scientific practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
National Academy of Engineering (NAE) (2005). Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. National Academies Press, Washington D.C.
Nespor, J. (1994). Knowledge in motion: Space, time and curriculum in undergraduate physics and management. London: Routledge.
Noble, D. (1977). America by design. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
O’Connor, K. (2001). Contextualization and the negotiation of social identities in a geographically distributed situated learning project. Linguistics and Education, 12, 285–308.
O’Connor, K. (2003). Communicative practice, cultural production, and situated learning: Constructing and contesting identities of expertise in a heterogeneous learning context. In Wortham, S. & Rymes, B. (Eds.), Linguistic anthropology of education (pp. 63–91). London: Praeger.
O’Connor, K., & Allen, A. (2010). Learning as the organizing of social futures. NSSE Yearbook, 109(1), 160–175.
O’Connor, K., Bailey, T., Garrison, L., Jones, M., Lichtenstein, G., Loshbaugh, H.,…Stevens, R. (2007). Sponsorship: Engineering's tacit gatekeeper. In Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, HI.
Orr, J. (1996). Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Penuel, W., & O’Connor, K. (2010). Learning research as a human science: Old wine in new bottles? National Society for the Study of Education, 109(1), 268–283.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. New York, NY: Doubleday.
Radcliffe, D. F. (2006). Shaping the discipline of engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(4), 263–264.
Riley, D., Pawley, A., Tucker, J., & Catalano, G. D. (2009). Feminisms in engineering education. NWSA, 21(2), 21–40.
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. W. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.
Robinson, J. G., & McIlwee, J. S. (1991). Men, women, and the culture of engineering. Sociological Quarterly, 32(3), 403–421.
Sellen, A. J., & Harper, R. (2003). The myth of the paperless office. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Skinner, D., Valsiner, J., & Holland, D. (2001). Discerning the dialogical self: A theoretical and methodological examination of a Nepali adolescent's narrative. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, North America. Retrieved from
Smith, T., & Rivkin, J. (2008). A replication tudy of Alan Blinder's “How many US jobs might be offshorable?” Harvard Business School Strategy Unit Working Paper (08-104).
Steering Committee of the National Engineering Education Research Colloquies. (2006). Special report: The research agenda for the new discipline of engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(4), 259–261.
Stevens, R. R. (1999). Disciplined perception: Comparing the development of embodied mathematical practices in school and at work. Doctoral dissertation. University of California, Berkeley, 1999. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 06A.
Stevens, R. (2000). Divisions of labor in school and in the workplace: Comparing computer and paper-supported activities across settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 373–401.
Stevens, R., & Hall, R. (1998). Disciplined perception: Learning to see in technoscience. In Lampert, M. & Blunk, M. L. (Eds.), (Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning (pp. 107–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stevens, R., Amos, D.Jocuns, A. & Garrison, L. (2007). Engineering as lifestyle and a meritocracy of difficulty: Two pervasive beliefs among engineering students and their possible effects. In Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Honolulu, HI.
Stevens, R., Garrison, L., & Satwicz, T. (2007). “Mathematics” as a shifting object across the early career of an engineer. Paper presented at Invited Symposium for Education and the Professions Division, AERA, Chicago, IL.
Stevens, R., O’Connor, K., & Garrison, L. (2005). Engineering student identities in the navigation of the undergraduate curriculum. In Proceedings of the 2005 Association of the Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Portland, OR.
Stevens, R., O’Connor, K., Garrison, L., Jocuns, A., & Amos, D. (2008). Becoming an engineer: Toward a three dimensional view of engineering learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 355–368.
Suchman, L. (2000). Embodied practices of engineering work. Mind, Culture and Activity, 7(1–2), 4–18.
Trevelyan, J. P. (2007). Technical coordination in engineering practice. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(3), 191–204.
Trevelyan, J. (2010). Reconstructing engineering from practice. Engineering Studies 2(3), 175–196.
Trevelyan, J. P., & Tilli, S. (2007). Published research on engineering work. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 133(4), 300–307.
Vinck, D. (Ed.) (2003). Everyday engineering: An ethnography of design and innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Williams, R. (2002). Retooling: A historian confronts technological change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Will-Zocholl, M., & Schmiede, R. (2011). Engineers’ work on the move: Challenges in automobile engineering in a globalized world. Engineering Studies 3(2), 101–121.
Yates, J. (1989). Control through communication: The rise of system in American management. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.
Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Research commentary – the new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 724–735.
Youngjin, Y., Lyytinen, K. J., Boland, R. J., & Berente, N. (2010). The next wave of digital innovation: Opportunities and challenges. A Report on the Research Workshop Digital Challenges in Innovation Research. Retrieved from
Zuboff, S. (1988). In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Zussman, R. (1985). Mechanics of the middle class: Work and politics among American engineers. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.