Abel, M. H. (2002). Humor, stress, and coping strategies. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 15, 365–81.Google Scholar

Aghababaei, N. (2012). Religious, honest, and humble: looking for the religious person within the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 880–3. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.07.005Google Scholar

Akinola, M., & Mendes, W. (2008). The dark side of creativity: biological vulnerability and negative emotions lead to greater artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1677–86. doi:10.1177/0146167208323933CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: a psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47(1), i–171. doi:10.1037/h0093360Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: a consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997– 1013.Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context: Update to “The Social Psychology of Creativity.” Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Angleitner, A., & Ostendorf, F. (1989, July). Personality Factors via Self and Peer Ratings Based on a Representative Sample of German Trait Descriptive Terms. Paper presented at the First European Congress of Psychology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.Google Scholar

Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2008). The prediction of honesty-humility-related criteria by the HEXACO and five-factor models of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1216–28. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.03.006Google Scholar

Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO-60: a short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 340–5. doi:10.1080/00223890902935878Google Scholar

Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., de Vries, R. E., et al. (2004a). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 356–66. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.86.2.356Google Scholar

Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Vernon, P. A., & Jang, K. L. (2000). Fluid intelligence, crystallized intelligence, and the openness/intellect factor. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 198–207.Google Scholar

Babad, E. Y. (1974). A multi-method approach to the assessment of humor. Journal of Personality, 42, 618–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baer, J. (1991). Generality of creativity across performance domains. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 23–39. doi:10.1080/10400419109534371Google Scholar

Baer, J. (1996). The effects of task-specific divergent-thinking training. Journal of Creative Behavior, 30, 183–7.Google Scholar

Batey, M. (2007). A Psychometric Investigation of Everyday Creativity. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University College London.Google Scholar

Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2013). Metaphorically speaking: cognitive abilities and the production of figurative language. Memory & Cognition, 41(2), 255–67. doi:10.3758/s13421-012–0258–5Google Scholar

Benedek, M., Mühlmann, C., Jauk, E., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). Assessment of divergent thinking by means of the subjective top-scoring method: effects of the number of top-ideas and time-on-task on reliability and validity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7, 341–9. doi:10.1037/a0033644Google Scholar

Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, Arousal, and Curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Boies, K., Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., Pascal, S., & Nicol, A. M. (2001). The structure of the French personality lexicon. European Journal of Personality, 15, 277–95. doi:10.1002/per.411Google Scholar

Brodzinsky, D. M., & Rubien, J. (1976). Humor production as a function of sex of subject, creativity, and cartoon content. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 597–600. doi:10.1037/0022–006X.44.4.597Google Scholar

Caird, S., & Martin, R. A. (2014). Relationship-focused humor styles and relationship satisfaction in dating couples: a repeated-measures design. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 27, 227–47. doi:10.1515/humor-2014-0015Google Scholar

Cardinet, J., Johnson, S., & Pini, G. (2010). Applying Generalizability Theory Using EduG. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the Creative Achievement Questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 37–50.Google Scholar

Cattell, R. B. (1948). Primary personality factors in the realm of objective tests. Journal of Personality, 16, 459–87. doi:10.1111/j.1467–6494.1948.tb02301.xGoogle Scholar

Christensen, P. R., Guilford, J. P., & Wilson, R. C. (1957). Relations of creative responses to working time and instructions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 82–8. doi:10.1037/h0045461Google Scholar

Clark, P. M., & Mirels, H. L. (1970). Fluency as a pervasive element in the measurement of creativity. Journal of Educational Measurement, 7, 83–6.Google Scholar

Connelly, B. S., Ones, D. S., Davies, S. E., & Birkland, A. (2014). Opening up openness: a theoretical sort following critical incidents methodology and a meta-analytic investigation of the trait family measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 17–28.Google Scholar

Conner, T. S., DeYoung, C. G., & Silvia, P. J. (in press). Everyday creative activity as a path to flourishing. Journal of Positive Psychology.Google Scholar

Conner, T. S., & Silvia, P. J. (2015). Creative days: a daily diary study of emotion, personality, and everyday creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 463–70.Google Scholar

Cooper, H. (2009). Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach (4th edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Costa, P.T. Jr., & McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Dagnes, A. (2012). A Conservative Walks into a Bar: The Politics of Political Humor. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

de Raad, B. (1992). The replicability of the Big Five personality dimensions in three word-classes of the Dutch language. European Journal of Personality, 6, 15–29. doi:10.1002/per.2410060103Google Scholar

de Vries, R. E. (2013). The 24-item Brief HEXACO Inventory (BHI). Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 871–80. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.09.003Google Scholar

DeYoung, C. G. (2011). Intelligence and Personality. In Sternberg, R. J. & Kaufman, S. B. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence (pp. 711–37). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Sources of openness/intellect: cognitive and neuropsychological correlates of the fifth factor of personality. Journal of Personality, 73(4), 825–58. doi:10.1111/j.1467–6494.2005.00330.xGoogle Scholar

DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880–96. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.93.5.880Google Scholar

Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–40. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221Google Scholar

Dollinger, S. J. (2003). Need for uniqueness, need for cognition, and creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 37, 99–116.Google Scholar

Dollinger, S. J. (2011). “Standardized minds” or individuality? Admissions tests and creativity revisited. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 329–41.Google Scholar

Dollinger, S. J., & Clancy, S. M. (1993). Identity, self, and personality: II. Glimpses through the autophotographic eye. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 1064–71. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.64.6.1064Google Scholar

Dollinger, S. J. (2007). Creativity and conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1025–35. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.023Google Scholar

Dunlop, P. D., Morrison, D. L., Koenig, J., & Silcox, B. (2012). Comparing the Eysenck and HEXACO models of personality in the prediction of adult delinquency. European Journal of Personality, 26, 194–202. doi:10.1002/per.824Google Scholar

Earleywine, M. (2010). Humor 101. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. (1947). Dimensions of Personality. Oxford: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Feingold, A. (1983). Measuring humor ability: revision and construct validation of the Humor Perceptiveness Test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 56, 159–66. doi:10.2466/pms.1983.56.1.159CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feingold, A., & Mazzella, R. (1991). Psychometric intelligence and verbal humor ability. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 427–35. doi:10.1016/0191–8869(91)90060-OCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feingold, A., & Mazzella, R. (1993). Preliminary validation of a multidimensional model of wittiness. Journal of Personality, 61, 439–56. doi:10.1111/j.1467–6494.1993.tb00288.xGoogle Scholar

Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5Google Scholar

Feist, G. J. (2010). The Function of Personality in Creativity: The Nature and Nurture of the Creative Personality. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 113–30). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Feist, G. J., & Barron, F. X. (2003). Predicting creativity from early to late adulthood: intellect, potential, and personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 62–88.Google Scholar

Fiske, D. W. (1949). Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44, 329–44. doi:10.1037/h0057198Google Scholar

Furnham, A., & Bachtiar, V. (2008). Personality and intelligence as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(7), 613–17. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.06.023Google Scholar

Furnham, A., Crump, J., Batey, M., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2009). Personality and ability predictors of the “Consequences” Test of divergent thinking in a large non-student sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(4), 536–40. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.12.007Google Scholar

Fürst, G., Ghisletta, P., & Lubart, T. (2016). Toward an integrative model of creativity and personality: theoretical suggestions and preliminary empirical testing. Journal of Creative Behavior, 50, 87–108.Google Scholar

Gaughan, E. T., Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2012). Examining the utility of general models of personality in the study of psychopathy: a comparison of the HEXACO-PI-R and NEO PI-R. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, 513–23. doi:10.1521/pedi.2012.26.4.513Google Scholar

Getzels, J. W., & Jackson, P. W. (1962). Creativity and Intelligence: Explorations with Gifted Students. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar

Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1398–1405.Google Scholar

Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Unconfounding situational attributions from uncertain, neutral, and ambiguous ones: a psychometric analysis of descriptions of oneself and various types of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(3), 517–52. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.41.3.517Google Scholar

Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A Broad-Bandwidth, Public Domain, Personality Inventory Measuring the Lower-Level Facets of Several Five-Factor Models. In Mervielde, I., Deary, I., De Fruyt, F., & Ostendorf, F. (eds.), Personality Psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg, Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar

Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., et al. (2006). The International Personality Item Pool and the future of public-domain personality assessment. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96.Google Scholar

Greengross, G., Martin, R. A., & Miller, G. (2012). Personality traits, intelligence, humor styles, and humor production ability of professional stand-up comedians compared to college students. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 74–82. doi:10.1037/a0025774Google Scholar

Greengross, G., & Miller, G. (2011). Humor ability reveals intelligence, predicts mating success, and is higher in males. Intelligence, 39, 188–92. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2011.03.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Han, K. (2003). Domain-specificity of creativity in young children: how quantitative and qualitative data support it. Journal of Creative Behavior, 37, 117–42.Google Scholar

Hahn, D., Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (1999). A factor analysis of the most frequently used Korean personality trait adjectives. European Journal of Personality, 13, 261–82.Google Scholar

Helson, R., Roberts, B., & Agronick, G. (1995). Enduringness and change in creative personality and the prediction of occupational creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1173–83.Google Scholar

Hocevar, D. (1979). Ideational fluency as a confounding factor in the measurement of originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 191–6.Google Scholar

Hocevar, D. (1981). Measurement of creativity: review and critique. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 450– 64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Holland, J. L. (1997). Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Vocational Personalities and Work Environments (3rd edn.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Howrigan, D. P., & MacDonald, K. B. (2008). Humor as a mental fitness indicator. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 625–66.Google Scholar

Hughes, D. J., Furnham, A., & Batey, M. (2013). The structure and personality predictors of self-rated creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 76–84. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2012.10.001Google Scholar

Jang, K. L., Livesley, W., Angleitner, A., Riemann, R., & Vernon, P. A. (2002). Genetic and environmental influences on the covariance of facets defining the domains of the five-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(1), 83–101. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00137–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karwowski, M., & Lebuda, I. (2016). The Big Five, the Huge Two, and creative self-beliefs: a meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10, 214–32.Google Scholar

Kaufman, S. B. (2009). Faith in intuition is associated with decreased latent inhibition in a sample of high-achieving adolescents. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 28–34.Google Scholar

Kaufman, S. B. (2013). Opening up openness to experience: a four-factor model and relations to creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(4), 233–55. doi:10.1002/jocb.33CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., Cole, J. C., & Baer, J. (2009). The construct of creativity: a structural model for self-reported creativity ratings. Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, 119–34.Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J. A., & Baer, J. (2008). Essentials of Creativity Assessment. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., Pumaccahua, T. T., & Holt, R. E. (2013). Personality and creativity in realistic, investigative, artistic, social, and enterprising college majors. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(8), 913–17.Google Scholar

Kaufman, S. B., DeYoung, C. G., Gray, J. R., Jimenez, L., Brown, J. B., et al. (2010). Implicit learning as an ability. Cognition, 116, 321–40.Google Scholar

Kaufman, S. B., Quilty, L. C., Grazioplene, R. G., Hirsh, J. B., Gray, J. R., et al. (2016). Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Personality, 84, 248–58.Google Scholar

Kim, K. H. (2006). Can we trust creativity tests? A review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT). Creativity Research Journal, 18, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, L. A., McKee Walker, L., & Broyles, S. J. (1996). Creativity and the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 30(2), 189–203. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1996.0013Google Scholar

Köhler, G., & Ruch, W. (1996). Sources of variance in current sense of humor inventories: how much substance, how much method variance? Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 9, 363–97. doi:10.1515/humr.1996.9.3–4.363Google Scholar

Koppel, M. A., & Sechrest, L. (1970). A multitrait-multimethod matrix analysis of sense of humor. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 77–85. doi:10.1177/001316447003000107CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kozbelt, A., & Nishioka, K. (2010). Humor comprehension, humor production, and insight: an exploratory study. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 23(3), 375–401. doi:10.1515/HUMR.2010.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 329–58. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8Google Scholar

Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2013). Prediction of self- and observer report scores on HEXACO-60 and NEO-FFI scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 668–75. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.06.002Google Scholar

Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2014). The dark triad, the Big Five, and the HEXACO model. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 2–5. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.048Google Scholar

Lin, W., Hsu, K., Chen, H., & Wang, J. (2011). The relations of gender and personality traits on different creativities: a dual-process theory account. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(2), 112–23. doi:10.1037/a0026241Google Scholar

Long, C. R., & Greenwood, D. N. (2013). Joking in the face of death: a terror management approach to humor production. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 26, 493–509. doi:10.1515/humor-2013-0012Google Scholar

Martin, R. (2003). Sense of Humor. In Lopez, S. J. & Snyder, C. R. (eds.), Positive Psychological Assessment: A Handbook of Models and Measures (pp. 313–26). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10612-020Google Scholar

Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, K. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(1), 48–75. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00534–2Google Scholar

Martin, G. N., & Sullivan, E. (2013). Sense of humor across cultures: a comparison of British, Australian and American respondents. North American Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 375–84.Google Scholar

Masten, A. S. (1986). Humor and competence in school-aged children. Child Development, 57(2), 461–73. doi:10.2307/1130601Google Scholar

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2007). Brief versions of the NEO-PI-3. Journal of Individual Differences, 28(3), 116.Google Scholar

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2008). The Five-Factor Theory of Personality. In John, O. P., Robins, R. W., & Pervin, L. A. (eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (3rd edn., pp. 159–81). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T. Jr., & Martin, T. A. (2005). The NEO-PI-3: a more readable revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84(3), 261–70. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8403_05Google Scholar

Mednick, S. A. (1968). The remote associates test. Journal of Creative Behavior, 2, 213–14. doi: 10.1002/j.2162–6057.1968.tb00104.xGoogle Scholar

Mickes, L., Walker, D. E., Parris, J. L., Mankoff, R., & Christenfeld, N. S. (2012). Who’s funny: gender stereotypes, humor production, and memory bias. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(1), 108–12. doi:10.3758/s13423-011–0161–2Google Scholar

Moran, J. M., Rain, M., Page-Gould, E., & Mar, R. A. (2014). Do I amuse you? Asymmetric predictors for humor appreciation and humor production. Journal of Research in Personality, 49, 8–13. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.12.002Google Scholar

Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). Are intelligence and creativity really so different? Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking. Intelligence, 39(1), 36–45. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2010.11.002Google Scholar

Nusbaum, E. C., Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. E. (2014). Ready, set, create: effects of telling people to “be creative” on divergent thinking tasks. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(4), 423–32.Google Scholar

Nusbaum, E. C., Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. B. (in press). Ha ha? Assessing humor production ability and personality. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts.Google Scholar

Papousek, I., Schulter, G., Lackner, H. K., Samson, A., & Freudenthaler, H. H. (2014). Experimentally observed responses to humor are related to individual differences in emotion perception and regulation in everyday life. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 27(2), 271–86. doi:10.1515/humor-2014-0018Google Scholar

Plucker, J. A., Qian, M., & Wang, S. (2011). Is originality in the eye of the beholder? Comparison of scoring techniques in the assessment of divergent thinking. Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(1), 1–22.Google Scholar

Pretz, J. E., & McCollum, V. A. (2014). Self-perceptions of creativity do not always reflect actual creative performance. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 227–36. doi:10.1037/a0035597Google Scholar

Primi, R. (2014). Divergent productions of metaphors: combining many-facet Rasch measurement and cognitive psychology in the assessment of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 461–74.Google Scholar

Puryear, J. S., Kettler, T., & Rinn, A. N. (in press). Relationships of personality to differential conceptions of creativity: a systematic review. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts.Google Scholar

Robinson, D. T., & Smith-Lovin, L. (2001). Getting a laugh: gender, status, and humor in task discussions. Social Forces, 80(1), 123–58. doi:10.1353/sof.2001.0085Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (1986). Flexibility and originality in children’s divergent thinking. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 120(4), 345–52. doi:10.1080/00223980.1986.9712632Google Scholar

Schönbrodt, F. D., & Perugini, M. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize? Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 609–12.Google Scholar

Silvia, P. J. (2007). Knowledge-based assessment of expertise in the arts: exploring aesthetic fluency. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 247–49.Google Scholar

Silvia, P. J. (2015). Intelligence and creativity are pretty similar after all. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 599–606.Google Scholar

Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. E. (2012). Making creative metaphors: the importance of fluid intelligence for creative thought. Intelligence, 40, 343–51.Google Scholar

Silvia, P. J., Beaty, R. E., & Nusbaum, E. C. (2013). Verbal fluency and creativity: general and specific contributions of broad retrieval ability (Gr) factors to divergent thinking. Intelligence, 41, 328–40.Google Scholar

Silvia, P. J., Beaty, R. E., Nusbaum, E. C., Eddington, K. M., Levin-Aspenson, H., et al. (2014). Everyday creativity in daily life: an experience-sampling study of “little c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 183–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silvia, P. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2009). Is creativity domain-specific? Latent class models of creative accomplishments and creative self-descriptions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(3), 139–48. doi:10.1037/a0014940Google Scholar

Silvia, P. J., & Nusbaum, E. C. (2012). What’s your major? College majors as markers of creativity. International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 22(2), 31–43.Google Scholar

Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Berg, C., Martin, C., & O’Connor, A. (2009). Openness to experience, plasticity, and creativity: exploring lower-order, higher-order, and interactive effects. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1087–90.Google Scholar

Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., et al. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 68– 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skrondal, A., & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2004). Generalized Latent Variable Modeling: Multilevel, Longitudinal, and Structural Equation Models. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, E. E., & Goodchilds, J. D. (1963). The wit in large and small established groups. Psychological Reports, 13(1), 273–4. doi:10.2466/pr0.1963.13.1.273Google Scholar

Sneed, C. D., McCrae, R. R., & Funder, D. C. (1998). Lay conceptions of the five-factor model and its indicators. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(2), 115–26. doi:10.1177/0146167298242001Google Scholar

Thalmayer, A., Saucier, G., & Eigenhuis, A. (2011). Comparative validity of brief to medium-length Big Five and Big Six personality questionnaires. Psychological Assessment, 23(4), 995–1009. doi:10.1037/a0024165Google Scholar

Torrance, E. (1974). Interscholastic brainstorming and creative problem solving competition for the creatively gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 18(1), 3–7.Google Scholar

Torrance, E. P. (2008). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms – Technical Manual, Verbal Forms A and B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.Google Scholar

Torrance, E., & Haensly, P. A. (2003). Assessment of Creativity in Children and Adolescents. In Reynolds, C. R. & Kamphaus, R. W. (eds.), Handbook of Psychological and Educational Assessment of Children: Intelligence, Aptitude, and Achievement (2nd edn., pp. 584–607). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Treadwell, Y. (1970). Humor and creativity. Psychological Reports, 26(1), 55–8. doi:10.2466/pr0.1970.26.1.55Google Scholar

Turner, R. G. (1980). Self-monitoring and humor production. Journal of Personality, 48(2), 163–72. doi:10.1111/j.1467–6494.1980.tb00825.xGoogle Scholar

Urban, K. K. (1991). On the development of creativity in children. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 177–91.Google Scholar

Veatch, T. C. (1998). A theory of humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 11(2), 161–215. doi:10.1515/humr.1998.11.2.161Google Scholar

Walker, B. R., & Jackson, C. J. (2014). How the five factor model and revised reinforcement sensitivity theory predict divergent thinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 57, 54–8. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.09.011Google Scholar

Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of Thinking in Young Children: A Study of the Creativity-Intelligence Distinction. Oxford: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Wasti, S., Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., & Somer, O. (2008). Six Turkish personality factors and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(6), 665–84. doi:10.1177/0022022108323783Google Scholar

Weisfield, G. E., Nowak, N. T., Lacas, T., Weisfeld, C. C., Imamoğlu, E. O., et al. (2011). Do women seek humorousness in men because it signals intelligence? A cross-cultural test. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 24(4), 435–62. doi:10.1515/HUMR.2011.025Google Scholar

Wilson, R. C., Guilford, J. P., & Christensen, P. R. (1953). The measurement of individual differences in originality. Psychological Bulletin, 50(5), 362–70. doi:10.1037/h0060857Google Scholar

Wisniewski, E. J. (1997). Conceptual Combination: Possibilities and Esthetics. In Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Vaid, J. (eds.), Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes (pp. 51–81). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Wolfradt, U., & Pretz, J. E. (2001). Individual differences in creativity: personality, story writing, and hobbies. European Journal of Personality, 15(4), 297–310. doi:10.1002/per.409Google Scholar

Woo, S. E., Chernyshenko, O. S., Longley, A., Zhang, Z. X., Chiu, C. Y., et al. (2014). Openness to experience: its lower level structure, measurement, and cross-cultural equivalence. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 29–45.Google Scholar

Ziller, R. C. (1990). Environment-self-behavior: a general theory of personal control. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 5, 227–42.Google Scholar

Zweyer, K., Velker, B., & Ruch, W. (2004). Do cheerfulness, exhilaration, and humor production moderate pain tolerance? A FACS study. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 17, 85–119.Google Scholar