Acar, S., & Sen, S. (2013). A multilevel meta-analysis of the relationship between creativity and schizotypy. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), 214–28. doi:10.1037/a0031975
Agnoli, S., Franchin, L., Rubaltelli, E., & Corazza, G. E. (2015). An eye-tracking analysis of irrelevance processing as moderator of openness and creative performance. Creativity Research Journal, 27(2), 125–32. doi:10.1080/10400419.2015.1030304
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual 5. Washington, DC: APA.
Austin, E. J. (2005). Personality correlates of the broader autism phenotype as assessed by the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ). Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 451–60.
Babbage, D. R., & Ronan, K. R. (2000). Philosophical worldview and personality factors in traditional and social scientists: study the world in our own image. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 405–20.
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Stott, C., Bolton, P., & Goodyer, I. (1997). Is there a link between engineering and autism? Autism, 1, 101–9.
Baron-Cohen, S. Bolton, P., Wheelwright, S., Short, L., Mead, G., et al. (1998). Autism occurs more often in families of physicists, engineers, and mathematicians, Autism, 2, 296–301.
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Burtenshaw, A., & Hobson, E. (2007). Mathematical talent is linked to autism. Human Nature, 18, 125–31. doi: 10.1007/s12110-007–9014-0.
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Robinson, J., & Woodbury-Smith, M. (2005). The Adult Asperger Assessment (AAA): A diagnostic method. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35, 807–19.
Barron, F. X. (1955). The disposition toward originality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 478–85.
Barron, F. X. (1963). Creativity and Psychological Health. New York: Van Nostrand.
Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2008). The relationship between measures of creativity and schizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 816–21.
Batey, M., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2010). Individual differences in ideational behavior: can the Big Five and psychometric intelligence predict creativity scores? Creativity Research Journal, 22(1), 90–7. doi:10.1080/10400410903579627
Billington, J., Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2007). Cognitive style predicts entry into physical sciences and humanities: questionnaire and performance tests of empathy and systemizing. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 260–8.
Block, J. (1978). The Q-Sort Method in Personality Assessment and Psychiatric Research. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Busse, T. V., & Mansfield, R. S. (1984). Selected personality traits and achievement in male scientists. Journal of Psychology, 116, 117–31.
Carroll, J. M., & Yung, C. K. (2006). Sex and discipline differences in empathizing, systemizing, and autistic symptomatology: evidence from a student population. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 949–57.
Carson, S. H. (2011). Creativity and psychopathology: a shared vulnerability model. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 56, 144–53.
Carson, S. H. (2014). Leveraging the “mad genius” debate: why we need a neuroscience of creativity and psychopathology. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1–4.
Casanova, M. F., Switala, A. E., Trippe, J., & Fitzgerald, M. (2007). Comparative minicolumnar morphometry of three distinguished scientists. Autism, 11, 557–69.
Chambers, J. A. (1964). Relating personality and biographical factors to scientific creativity. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 78, 1–20.
Chang, C., Wang, J., Liang, C.-T., & Liang, C. (2014). Curvilinear effects of openness and agreeableness on the imaginative capability of student designers. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 14, 68–75. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2014.09.001
Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2006). Creativity versus conscientiousness: which is a better predictor of student performance? Journal of Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 521–31.
Chiang, Y., Hsu, C., & Shih, H. (2015). Experienced high performance work system, extroversion personality, and creativity performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(2), 531–49. doi:10.1007/s10490-014–9403-y
Claridge, G., Pryor, R., & Watkins, G. (1990). Sounds from the Bell Jar: Ten Psychotic Authors. London: Macmillan.
Conway, J. B. (1988). Differences among clinical psychologists: scientists, practitioners, and science-practitioners. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 19, 642–55.
DeYoung, C. G., Grazioplene, R. G., & Peterson, J. B. (2012). From madness to genius: the openness/intellect trait domain as a paradoxical simplex. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(1), 63–78.
Dollinger, S. J., Urban, K. K., & James, T. A. (2004). Creativity and openness: further validation of two creative product measures. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 35–47.
Eysenck, H. J. (1993). Creativity and personality: suggestions for a theory. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 147–78.
Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Genius: The Natural History of Creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Eysenck, S. G., White, O., & Eysenck, H. J. (1976). Personality and mental illness. Psychological Reports, 39, 1011–22.
Feist, G. J. (1993). A structural model of scientific eminence. Psychological Science, 4, 366–71.
Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of the impact of personality on scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychological Review, 2, 290–309.
Feist, G. J. (2006a). How development and personality influence scientific thought, interest, and achievement. Review of General Psychology, 10, 163–82.
Feist, G. J. (2006b). The Psychology of Science and the Origins of the Scientific Mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Feist, G. J. (2010). The Function of Personality in Creativity: The Nature and Nurture of the Creative Personality. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.). Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 113–30). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Feist, G. J. (2012). Predicting interest in and attitudes toward science from personality and need for cognition. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 771–5. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.005
Feist, G. J., & Rosenberg, E. L. (2015). Psychology: Perspectives & Connections (3rd edn.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Feist, J., Feist, G. J., & Roberts, T. A. (2013). Theories of Personality (8th edn.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Francis, B., Skelton, C., & Read, B. (2012). The Identities and Practices of High Achieving Pupils: Negotiating Achievement and Peer Cultures. London: Continuum.
Frayling, C. (2005). Mad, Bad and Dangerous? The Scientist and the cinema. London: Reaktion Books.
Focquaert, F., Steven, M. S., Wolford, G. L., Colden, A., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (2007). Empathizing and systemizing cognitive traits in the sciences and humanities. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 619–25.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century. New York: Basic Books.
Gelade, G. A. (2002). Creative style, personality and artistic endeavour. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 128, 213–34.
Gough, H. G., & Woodworth, D. G. (1960). Stylistic variations among professional research scientists. Journal of Psychology, 49, 87–98.
Grosul, M. & Feist, G. J. (2014). The creative person in science. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 8, 30–43. doi: 10.1037/a0034828
Gustafsson, L. (1997). Inadequate cortical feature maps: a neural circuit theory of autism. Biological Psychiatry, 42, 1138–47.
Haller, C. S., & Courvoiser, D. S. (2010). Personality and thinking style in different creative domains. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 4, 149–60. doi: 10.1037/a00117084
Harris, J. A. (2004). Measured intelligence, achievement, openness to experience, and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 913–29.
Hart, J. J. (1982). Psychology of the scientists: XLVI. Correlation between theoretical orientation in psychology and personality type. Psychological Reports, 50, 795–801.
Haynes, R. D. (1994). From Faust to Strangelove: Representations of the Scientist in Western Literature. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Helson, R., & Crutchfield, R. S. (1970). Mathematicians: the creative researcher and the average PhD. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 34, 250–7.
Heller, K. A. (2007). Scientific ability and creativity. High Ability Studies, 18, 209–34.
Helmreich, R. L., Spence, J. T., & Pred, R. S. (1988). Making it without losing it: type A, achievement motivation and scientific attainment revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 495–504.
Iuculano, T., Rosenberg-Lee, M., Supekar, K., Lynch, C. J., Khousam, A., et al. (2014). Brain organization underlying superior mathematical abilities in children with autism. Biological Psychiatry, 75, 223–30. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.06.018.
Ivcevic, Z., & Brackett, M. A. (2015). Predicting creativity: interactive effects of openness to experience and emotion regulation ability. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(4), 480–7. doi:10.1037/a0039826
James, I. (2003). Singular scientists. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 96, 36–9.
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five Taxonomy: History, Measurement, and Theoretical Perspectives. In Pervin, L. A. & John, O. P. (eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (pp. 102–38). New York: Guilford Press.
Johnson, J. A., Germer, C. K., Efran, J. S., & Overton, W. F. (1988). Personality as the basis for theoretical predilections. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 824–35.
Jones, R. A. (1997). The boffin: a stereotype of scientists in post-war British films (1945–1970). Public Understanding of Science, 6, 31–48.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Karwowski, M., & Lebuda, I. (2016). The Big Five, the Huge Two, and creative self-beliefs: a meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(2), 214–32. doi:10.1037/aca0000035.
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: the Four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1–12.
Kaufman, S. B. (2013). Opening up openness to experience: a four-factor model and relations to creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Creative Behavior, 47, 233–55. doi: 10.1002/jocb.33
Kaufman, S. B., Kozbelt, A., Silvia, P., Kaufman, J. C., Ramesh, S., et al. (2014). Who finds Bill Gates sexy? Creative mate preferences as a function of cognitive ability, personality, and creative achievement. Journal of Creative Behavior, 48, 1–19. doi: 10.1002/jocb.78
Kaufman, S. B., Quilty, L. C., Grazioplene, R. G., Hirsh, J. B., Gray, J. R., et al. (2015). Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Personality, 84(2), 248–58. doi:10.1111/jopy.12156
King, L. A., McKee, W. L., & Broyles, S. J. (1996). Creativity and the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 189–203.
Ko, Y.-G., & Kim, J.-Y. (2008). Scientific geniuses’ psychopathology as a moderator in the relation between creative contribution types and eminence. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 251–61. doi: 10.1080/104004108022785677
Kokosh, J. (1969). MMPI personality characteristics of physical and social science students. Psychological Reports, 24, 883–93.
Kusumakar, V., Bond, J., & Yatham, L. N. (2002). Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypomania and Mania. In Yatham, L. N. & Kusumakar, V. (eds.), Bipolar Disorder: A Clinician’s Guide to Biological Treatments (2nd edn., pp. 1–18). New York: Brunner-Routledge.
Lippa, R. (1998). Gender-related individual differences and the structure of vocational interests: the importance of the people-things dimension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 996–1009.
Lloyd-Evans, R., Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Bipolar Disorder and Creativity: Investigating a Possible Link. In Columbus, A. & Columbus, A. (eds.), Advances in Psychology Research (Vol. 40, pp. 111–41). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
Lounsbury, J. W., Foster, N., Patel, H., Carmody, P., Gibson, L. W., et al. (2012). An investigation of the personality traits of scientists versus nonscientists and their relationship with career satisfaction. R&D Management, 42, 47–59.
Lubow, R. E. (1989). Latent Inhibition and Conditioned Attention Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ludwig, A. M. (1995). The Price of Greatness: Resolving the Creativity and Madness Controversy. New York: Guilford Press.
Ludwig, A. M. (1998). Method and madness in the arts and sciences. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 93–101.
MacKinnon, D. W. (1978). In Search of Human Effectiveness. Buffalo, NY: Bearly.
Mason, O., Claridge, G., & Jackson, M. (1995). New scales for the assessment of schizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 7–13.
McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–65. doi: 10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.528
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1999). A Five-Factor Theory of Personality. In Pervin, L. A. & John, O. P. (eds.), Personality Theory and Research (pp. 139–53). New York: Guilford Press.
Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., Scullen, S. M., & Rounds, J. (2005). Higher-order dimensions of the Big Five personality traits and the Big Six vocational interest types. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 447–78.
Muir, H. (2003). Einstein and Newton showed signs of autism. New Scientist, April 30.
Nasar, S. (1998). A Beautiful Mind. New York: Touchstone.
Nettle, D. (2006). Schizotypy and mental health amongst poets, visual artists, and mathematicians. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 876–90.
O’Connell, H., & Fitzgerald, M. (2003). Did Alan Turing have Asperger’s syndrome? Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, 20, 28–31. doi: 10.1017/S0790966700007503
Pavitra, K. S., Chandrashekar, C. R., & Choudhury, P. (2007). Creativity and mental health: a profile of writers and musicians. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 49, 34–43.
Pickover, C. A. (1998). Strange Brains and Genius: The Secret Lives of Eccentric Scientists and Madmen. New York: Plenum Trade.
Post, F. (1994). Creativity and psychopathology: a study of 291 world famous men. British Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 22–34.
Prabhu, V., Sutton, C., & Sauser, W. (2008). Creativity and certain personality traits: understanding the mediating effect of intrinsic motivation. Creativity Research Journal, 20(1), 53–66. doi:10.1080/10400410701841955
Rado, S. (1953). Dynamics and classification of disordered behavior. American Journal of Psychiatry, 110, 4060–416.
Rawlings, D., & Locarnini, A. (2008). Dimensional schizotypy, autism, and unusual word associations in artists and scientists. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(2), 465–71.
Royalty, G. M., & Magoon, T. M. (1985). Correlates of scholarly productivity among counseling psychologists. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32, 458–61.
Rushton, J. P., Murray, H. G., & Paunonen, S. V. (1987). Personality Characteristics Associated with High Research Productivity. In Jackson, D. & Rushton, J. P. (eds.), Scientific Excellence, (pp. 129–48). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Sacks, O. (2001). Henry Cavendish: an early case of Asperger’s syndrome? Neurology, 57, 1347
Selby, E. C., Shaw, E. J., & Houtz, J. C. (2005). The creative personality. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 300–14. doi: 10.1177/001698620504900404
Shurkin, J. (2006). Broken Genius: The Rise and Fall of William Shockley, Creator of the Electronic Age. New York: Macmillian.
Silvia, P. J., Kaufman, J. C., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Wigert, B. (2011). Cantankerous creativity: honesty, humility, agreeableness, and the HEXACO structure of creative achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(5), 687–9. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.011
Simonton, D. K. (1999). Origins of Genius: Darwinian Perspectives on Creativity. New York: Oxford University Press.
Simonton, D. K. (2008). Scientific talent, training, and performance: intellect, personality, and genetic endowment. Review of General Psychology, 12, 28–46.
Simonton, D. K. (2009). Varieties of (scientific) creativity: a hierarchical model of domain-specific disposition, development, and achievement. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 441–52.
Suls, J., & Fletcher, B. (1983). Social comparison in the social and physical sciences: an archival study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(3), 575–80. doi:10.1037/0022–35184.108.40.2065
Tang, C., & Kaufman, J. C. (2015). Personal characteristics that distinguish creative scientists from less creative scientists. Journal of Creative Behavior (in press). doi:10.1002/jocb.99
Thomson, N. D., Wurtzburg, S. J., & Centifanti, L. C. M. (2015). Empathy or science? Empathy explains physical science enrollment for men and women. Learning and Individual Differences, 40, 115–120.
Treffert, D. A. (2006). Extraordinary People: Understanding Savant Syndrome (Updated Version). Lincoln, NE: iUniverse.
van Tilburg, W. P., Sedikides, C., & Wildschut, T. (2015). The mnemonic muse: nostalgia fosters creativity through openness to experience. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 59, 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.02.002
Van Zelst, R. H., & Kerr, W. A. (1954). Personality self-assessment of scientific and technical personnel. Journal of Applied Psychology, 38, 145–7.
Wertheim, M. (2011). Physics on the Fringe: Smoke Rings, Circlons, and Alternative Theories of Everything. New York: Walker.
Wilson, G. D., & Jackson, C. (1994). The personality of physicists. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 187–9.
Wood, R. (2011). “The world in our own image” explored: philosophical worldview, gender-role and masculine gender role stress in nontraditional and traditional physical and social scientists. Dissertation Abstracts International, 71, 5108.
Wuthrich, V., & Bates, T. C. (2001). Schizotypy and latent inhibition: non-linear linkage between psychometric and cognitive markers. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(5), 783–98.
Zachar, P., & Leong, F. T. L. (1992). A problem of personality: scientist and practitioner differences in psychology. Journal of Personality, 60, 667–77.