Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T00:18:42.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Creativity and Personality

Measurement and Social Influences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2017

Gregory J. Feist
Affiliation:
San José State University, California
Roni Reiter-Palmon
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, Omaha
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: a consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 9971013.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: update to “The Social Psychology of Creativity,” Available at http://unomaha.worldcat.org/title/creativity-in-context/oclc/34358034.Google Scholar
Baer, J. (2011). How divergent thinking tests mislead us: are the Torrance tests still relevant in the 21st century? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 309–13. doi: 10.1037/a0025210Google Scholar
Batey, M. (2007). A Psychometric Investigation of Everyday Creativity. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University College London.Google Scholar
Batey, M., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2009). Intelligence and personality as predictors of divergent thinking: the role of general, fluid and crystallised intelligence. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4, 60–9. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2009.01.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, intelligence, and personality: a critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social & General Psychology Monographs, 132, 355429.Google Scholar
Batey, M., Furnham, A., & Safiullina, X. (2010). Intelligence, general knowledge and personality as predictors of creativity. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 532–5. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.04.008Google Scholar
Beaty, R. E., Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2014). Does insight problem solving predict real-world creativity? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 287–92. doi:10.1037/a0035727Google Scholar
Beaussart, M. L., Kaufman, S. B., & Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Creative activity, personality, mental illness, and short-term mating success. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 151–67. doi: 10.1002/jocb.11Google Scholar
Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 3750. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1701_4Google Scholar
Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2006). Creativity versus conscientiousness: which is a better predictor of student performance? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 521–31. doi:10.1002/acp.1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Reichenbacher, L. (2008). Effects of personality and threat of evaluation on divergent and convergent thinking. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 10951101. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2007.12.007Google Scholar
Chen, C., Kasof, J., Himsel, A., Dmitrieva, J., Dong, Q., et al. (2005). Effects of explicit instruction to “be creative” across domains and cultures. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 89110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C., Kasof, J., Himsel, A., Greenberger, E., Dong, Q., et al. (2002). Creativity in drawings of geometric shapes: a cross-cultural examination with the consensual assessment technique. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 171–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crammond, B., Matthews-Morgan, J., Bandalos, D., & Zuo, L. (2005). A report on the 40-year follow-up of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 283–91. doi:10.1177/001698620504900402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Openness/Intellect: A Dimension of Personality Reflecting Cognitive Exploration. In Mikulincer, M. and Shaver, P. R. (eds.). APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 4: Personality Processes and Individual Differences (pp. 369–99). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J. (2007). Creativity and conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1025–35. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.023Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J. (2011). “Standardized minds” or individuality? Admissions tests and creativity revisited. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 329–41. doi:10.1037/a0023659Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J., & Clancy, S. M. (1993). Identity, self, and personality: II. Glimpses through the autophotographic eye. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 1064–71.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J., Urban, K. K., & James, T. A. (2004). Creativity and openness: further validation of two creative product measures. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 3547. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1601_4Google Scholar
Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290309. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furnham, A., & Bachtiar, V. (2008). Personality and intelligence as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 613–17. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.06.023Google Scholar
Furnham, A., Batey, M., Anand, K., & Manfield, J. (2008). Personality, hypomania, intelligence and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1060–9. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.10.035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A., Crump, J., Batey, M., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2009). Personality and ability predictors of the “consequences” test of divergent thinking in a large non-student sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 536–40. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.12.007Google Scholar
Furnham, A., Hughes, D. J., & Marshall, E. (2013). Creativity, OCD, narcissism and the Big Five. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 91–8. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2013.05.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–54.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267–93.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hocevar, D. (1979, April). The Development of the Creative Behavior Inventory (CBI). Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Rocky Mountain Psychological Association (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. Ed. 170 350).Google Scholar
Hughes, D. J., Furnham, A., & Batey, M. (2013). The structure and personality predictors of self-rated creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 7684. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2012.10.001Google Scholar
Jauk, E., Benedek, M., Dunst, B., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). The relationship between intelligence and creativity: new support for the threshold hypothesis by means of empirical breakpoint detection. Intelligence, 41, 212–21. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2013.03.003Google Scholar
Kaufman, S. B. (2012). Counting the muses: development of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 298308. doi:10.1037/a0029751Google Scholar
Kaufman, S. B., Quilty, L. C., Grazioplene, R. G., Hirsh, J. B., Gray, J. R., et al. (2016). Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Personality, 84, 248–258. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., Waterstreet, M. A., Ailaouni, H. S., Whitcomb, H. J., Roe, A. K., et al. (2009). Personality and self-perceptions of creativity across domains. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 29, 193209. doi:10.2190/IC.29.3.cCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K. H. (2006). Can we trust creativity tests? A review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT). Creativity Research Journal, 18, 314.Google Scholar
King, L. A., Walker, L. M., & Broyles, S. J. (1996). Creativity and the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 189203. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1996.0013Google Scholar
Lee, S. A., & Dow, G. T. (2011). Malevolent creativity: does personality influence malicious divergent thinking? Creativity Research Journal, 23, 7382. doi:10.1080/10400419.2011.571179Google Scholar
Lee, I. R., & Kemple, K. (2014). Preservice teachers’ personality traits and engagement in creative activities as predictors of their support for children’s creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 8294. doi:10.1080/10400419.2014.873668Google Scholar
Martindale, C., & Dailey, A. (1996). Creativity, primary process cognition and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 409–14. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(95)00202-2Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–65. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1258Google Scholar
Niu, W., & Liu, D. (2009). Enhancing creativity: a comparison between effects of an indicative instruction “to be creative” and a more elaborate heuristic instruction on Chinese student creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 93–8. doi:10.1037/a0013660Google Scholar
Nusbaum, E. C., Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. E. (2014). Ready, set, create: what instructing people to “be creative” reveals about the meaning and mechanisms of divergent thinking. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 423–32. doi:10.1037/a0036549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plucker, J. A., & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric Approaches to the Study of Human Creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 3561). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pretz, J. E., & McCollum, V. A. (2014). Self-perceptions of creativity do not always reflect actual creative performance. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 227–36. doi:10.1037/a0035597Google Scholar
Reiter-Palmon, R., Illies, J. J., & Kobe-Cross, L. M. (2009). Conscientiousness is not always a good predictor of performance: the case of creativity. The International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 19, 2745.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A. (2004) Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A., Illies, J. J., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2005). Explicit instructions to be creative and original: a comparison of strategies and criteria as targets with three types of divergent thinking tests. Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 15, 515.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A., & Okuda, S. M. (1991). The instructional enhancement of the flexibility and originality scores of divergent thinking tests. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, 435–41. doi:10.1002/acp.2350050505Google Scholar
Sánchez-Ruiz, M. J., Hernández-Torrano, D., Pérez-González, J. C., Batey, M., & Petrides, K. V. (2011). The relationship between trait emotional intelligence and creativity across subject domains. Motivation and Emotion, 35, 461–73. doi:10.1007/s11031-011-9227-8Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J., Beaty, R. E., Nusbaum, E. C., Eddington, K. M., Levin-Aspenson, H., et al. (2014). Everyday creativity in daily life: an experience-sampling study of “little c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 183–8. doi:10.1037/a0035722Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Berg, C., Martin, C., & O’Connor, A. (2009). Openness to experience, plasticity, and creativity: exploring lower-order, high-order, and interactive effects. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1087–90. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.04.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvia, P. J., Wigert, B., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Assessing creativity with self-report scales: a review and empirical evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 1934. doi:10.1037/a0024071Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., et al. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 6885. doi: 10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.68Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The Concepts of Creativity: Prospects and Paradigms. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 315). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sung, S. Y., & Choi, J. N. (2009). Do Big Five personality factors affect individual creativity? The moderation role of extrinsic motiviation. Social Behavior and Personality, 37, 941–56. doi:10.2224/sbp.2009.37.7.941Google Scholar
von Stumm, S., Chung, A., & Furnham, A. (2011). Creative ability, creative ideation and latent classes of creative achievement: what is the role of personality? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 107–14. doi:10.1037/a0020499Google Scholar
Walker, B. R., & Jackson, C. J. (2014). How the five factor model and revised reinforcement sensitivity theory predict divergent thinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 57, 54–8. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.09.011Google Scholar
Wolfradt, U. & Pretz, J. E. (2001). Individual differences in creativity: personality, story writing, and hobbies. European Journal of Personality, 15, 297310. doi:10.1002/per.409Google Scholar
Wuthrich, V., & Bates, T. C. (2001). Schizotypy and latent inhibition: non-linear linkage between psychometric and cognitive markers. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 783–98. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00071-4Google Scholar

References

Abel, M. H. (2002). Humor, stress, and coping strategies. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 15, 365–81.Google Scholar
Aghababaei, N. (2012). Religious, honest, and humble: looking for the religious person within the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 880–3. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.07.005Google Scholar
Akinola, M., & Mendes, W. (2008). The dark side of creativity: biological vulnerability and negative emotions lead to greater artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1677–86. doi:10.1177/0146167208323933Google Scholar
Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: a psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47(1), i171. doi:10.1037/h0093360Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: a consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 9971013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context: Update to “The Social Psychology of Creativity.” Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Angleitner, A., & Ostendorf, F. (1989, July). Personality Factors via Self and Peer Ratings Based on a Representative Sample of German Trait Descriptive Terms. Paper presented at the First European Congress of Psychology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2008). The prediction of honesty-humility-related criteria by the HEXACO and five-factor models of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1216–28. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.03.006Google Scholar
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO-60: a short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 340–5. doi:10.1080/00223890902935878Google Scholar
Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., de Vries, R. E., et al. (2004a). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 356–66. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.86.2.356Google Scholar
Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Vernon, P. A., & Jang, K. L. (2000). Fluid intelligence, crystallized intelligence, and the openness/intellect factor. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 198207.Google Scholar
Babad, E. Y. (1974). A multi-method approach to the assessment of humor. Journal of Personality, 42, 618–31.Google Scholar
Baer, J. (1991). Generality of creativity across performance domains. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 2339. doi:10.1080/10400419109534371Google Scholar
Baer, J. (1996). The effects of task-specific divergent-thinking training. Journal of Creative Behavior, 30, 183–7.Google Scholar
Batey, M. (2007). A Psychometric Investigation of Everyday Creativity. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University College London.Google Scholar
Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2013). Metaphorically speaking: cognitive abilities and the production of figurative language. Memory & Cognition, 41(2), 255–67. doi:10.3758/s13421-012–0258–5Google Scholar
Benedek, M., Mühlmann, C., Jauk, E., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). Assessment of divergent thinking by means of the subjective top-scoring method: effects of the number of top-ideas and time-on-task on reliability and validity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7, 341–9. doi:10.1037/a0033644Google Scholar
Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, Arousal, and Curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Boies, K., Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., Pascal, S., & Nicol, A. M. (2001). The structure of the French personality lexicon. European Journal of Personality, 15, 277–95. doi:10.1002/per.411Google Scholar
Brodzinsky, D. M., & Rubien, J. (1976). Humor production as a function of sex of subject, creativity, and cartoon content. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 597600. doi:10.1037/0022–006X.44.4.597Google Scholar
Caird, S., & Martin, R. A. (2014). Relationship-focused humor styles and relationship satisfaction in dating couples: a repeated-measures design. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 27, 227–47. doi:10.1515/humor-2014-0015Google Scholar
Cardinet, J., Johnson, S., & Pini, G. (2010). Applying Generalizability Theory Using EduG. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the Creative Achievement Questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 3750.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1948). Primary personality factors in the realm of objective tests. Journal of Personality, 16, 459–87. doi:10.1111/j.1467–6494.1948.tb02301.xGoogle Scholar
Christensen, P. R., Guilford, J. P., & Wilson, R. C. (1957). Relations of creative responses to working time and instructions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 82–8. doi:10.1037/h0045461Google Scholar
Clark, P. M., & Mirels, H. L. (1970). Fluency as a pervasive element in the measurement of creativity. Journal of Educational Measurement, 7, 83–6.Google Scholar
Connelly, B. S., Ones, D. S., Davies, S. E., & Birkland, A. (2014). Opening up openness: a theoretical sort following critical incidents methodology and a meta-analytic investigation of the trait family measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 1728.Google Scholar
Conner, T. S., DeYoung, C. G., & Silvia, P. J. (in press). Everyday creative activity as a path to flourishing. Journal of Positive Psychology.Google Scholar
Conner, T. S., & Silvia, P. J. (2015). Creative days: a daily diary study of emotion, personality, and everyday creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 463–70.Google Scholar
Cooper, H. (2009). Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach (4th edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Costa, P.T. Jr., & McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Dagnes, A. (2012). A Conservative Walks into a Bar: The Politics of Political Humor. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
de Raad, B. (1992). The replicability of the Big Five personality dimensions in three word-classes of the Dutch language. European Journal of Personality, 6, 1529. doi:10.1002/per.2410060103Google Scholar
de Vries, R. E. (2013). The 24-item Brief HEXACO Inventory (BHI). Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 871–80. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.09.003Google Scholar
DeYoung, C. G. (2011). Intelligence and Personality. In Sternberg, R. J. & Kaufman, S. B. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence (pp. 711–37). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Sources of openness/intellect: cognitive and neuropsychological correlates of the fifth factor of personality. Journal of Personality, 73(4), 825–58. doi:10.1111/j.1467–6494.2005.00330.xGoogle Scholar
DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880–96. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.93.5.880Google Scholar
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–40. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J. (2003). Need for uniqueness, need for cognition, and creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 37, 99116.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J. (2011). “Standardized minds” or individuality? Admissions tests and creativity revisited. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 329–41.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J., & Clancy, S. M. (1993). Identity, self, and personality: II. Glimpses through the autophotographic eye. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 1064–71. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.64.6.1064Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J. (2007). Creativity and conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1025–35. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.023Google Scholar
Dunlop, P. D., Morrison, D. L., Koenig, J., & Silcox, B. (2012). Comparing the Eysenck and HEXACO models of personality in the prediction of adult delinquency. European Journal of Personality, 26, 194202. doi:10.1002/per.824Google Scholar
Earleywine, M. (2010). Humor 101. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1947). Dimensions of Personality. Oxford: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Feingold, A. (1983). Measuring humor ability: revision and construct validation of the Humor Perceptiveness Test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 56, 159–66. doi:10.2466/pms.1983.56.1.159Google Scholar
Feingold, A., & Mazzella, R. (1991). Psychometric intelligence and verbal humor ability. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 427–35. doi:10.1016/0191–8869(91)90060-OCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feingold, A., & Mazzella, R. (1993). Preliminary validation of a multidimensional model of wittiness. Journal of Personality, 61, 439–56. doi:10.1111/j.1467–6494.1993.tb00288.xGoogle Scholar
Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290309. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5Google Scholar
Feist, G. J. (2010). The Function of Personality in Creativity: The Nature and Nurture of the Creative Personality. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 113–30). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feist, G. J., & Barron, F. X. (2003). Predicting creativity from early to late adulthood: intellect, potential, and personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 6288.Google Scholar
Fiske, D. W. (1949). Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44, 329–44. doi:10.1037/h0057198Google Scholar
Furnham, A., & Bachtiar, V. (2008). Personality and intelligence as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(7), 613–17. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.06.023Google Scholar
Furnham, A., Crump, J., Batey, M., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2009). Personality and ability predictors of the “Consequences” Test of divergent thinking in a large non-student sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(4), 536–40. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.12.007Google Scholar
Fürst, G., Ghisletta, P., & Lubart, T. (2016). Toward an integrative model of creativity and personality: theoretical suggestions and preliminary empirical testing. Journal of Creative Behavior, 50, 87108.Google Scholar
Gaughan, E. T., Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2012). Examining the utility of general models of personality in the study of psychopathy: a comparison of the HEXACO-PI-R and NEO PI-R. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, 513–23. doi:10.1521/pedi.2012.26.4.513Google Scholar
Getzels, J. W., & Jackson, P. W. (1962). Creativity and Intelligence: Explorations with Gifted Students. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 13981405.Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Unconfounding situational attributions from uncertain, neutral, and ambiguous ones: a psychometric analysis of descriptions of oneself and various types of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(3), 517–52. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.41.3.517Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A Broad-Bandwidth, Public Domain, Personality Inventory Measuring the Lower-Level Facets of Several Five-Factor Models. In Mervielde, I., Deary, I., De Fruyt, F., & Ostendorf, F. (eds.), Personality Psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 728). Tilburg, Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., et al. (2006). The International Personality Item Pool and the future of public-domain personality assessment. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 8496.Google Scholar
Greengross, G., Martin, R. A., & Miller, G. (2012). Personality traits, intelligence, humor styles, and humor production ability of professional stand-up comedians compared to college students. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 7482. doi:10.1037/a0025774Google Scholar
Greengross, G., & Miller, G. (2011). Humor ability reveals intelligence, predicts mating success, and is higher in males. Intelligence, 39, 188–92. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2011.03.006Google Scholar
Han, K. (2003). Domain-specificity of creativity in young children: how quantitative and qualitative data support it. Journal of Creative Behavior, 37, 117–42.Google Scholar
Hahn, D., Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (1999). A factor analysis of the most frequently used Korean personality trait adjectives. European Journal of Personality, 13, 261–82.Google Scholar
Helson, R., Roberts, B., & Agronick, G. (1995). Enduringness and change in creative personality and the prediction of occupational creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1173–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hocevar, D. (1979). Ideational fluency as a confounding factor in the measurement of originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 191–6.Google Scholar
Hocevar, D. (1981). Measurement of creativity: review and critique. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 450– 64.Google Scholar
Holland, J. L. (1997). Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Vocational Personalities and Work Environments (3rd edn.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Howrigan, D. P., & MacDonald, K. B. (2008). Humor as a mental fitness indicator. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 625–66.Google Scholar
Hughes, D. J., Furnham, A., & Batey, M. (2013). The structure and personality predictors of self-rated creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 7684. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2012.10.001Google Scholar
Jang, K. L., Livesley, W., Angleitner, A., Riemann, R., & Vernon, P. A. (2002). Genetic and environmental influences on the covariance of facets defining the domains of the five-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(1), 83101. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00137–4Google Scholar
Karwowski, M., & Lebuda, I. (2016). The Big Five, the Huge Two, and creative self-beliefs: a meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10, 214–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, S. B. (2009). Faith in intuition is associated with decreased latent inhibition in a sample of high-achieving adolescents. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 2834.Google Scholar
Kaufman, S. B. (2013). Opening up openness to experience: a four-factor model and relations to creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(4), 233–55. doi:10.1002/jocb.33Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., Cole, J. C., & Baer, J. (2009). The construct of creativity: a structural model for self-reported creativity ratings. Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, 119–34.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J. A., & Baer, J. (2008). Essentials of Creativity Assessment. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., Pumaccahua, T. T., & Holt, R. E. (2013). Personality and creativity in realistic, investigative, artistic, social, and enterprising college majors. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(8), 913–17.Google Scholar
Kaufman, S. B., DeYoung, C. G., Gray, J. R., Jimenez, L., Brown, J. B., et al. (2010). Implicit learning as an ability. Cognition, 116, 321–40.Google Scholar
Kaufman, S. B., Quilty, L. C., Grazioplene, R. G., Hirsh, J. B., Gray, J. R., et al. (2016). Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Personality, 84, 248–58.Google Scholar
Kim, K. H. (2006). Can we trust creativity tests? A review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT). Creativity Research Journal, 18, 314.Google Scholar
King, L. A., McKee Walker, L., & Broyles, S. J. (1996). Creativity and the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 30(2), 189203. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1996.0013Google Scholar
Köhler, G., & Ruch, W. (1996). Sources of variance in current sense of humor inventories: how much substance, how much method variance? Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 9, 363–97. doi:10.1515/humr.1996.9.3–4.363Google Scholar
Koppel, M. A., & Sechrest, L. (1970). A multitrait-multimethod matrix analysis of sense of humor. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 7785. doi:10.1177/001316447003000107Google Scholar
Kozbelt, A., & Nishioka, K. (2010). Humor comprehension, humor production, and insight: an exploratory study. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 23(3), 375401. doi:10.1515/HUMR.2010.017Google Scholar
Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 329–58. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8Google Scholar
Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2013). Prediction of self- and observer report scores on HEXACO-60 and NEO-FFI scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 668–75. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.06.002Google Scholar
Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2014). The dark triad, the Big Five, and the HEXACO model. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 25. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.048Google Scholar
Lin, W., Hsu, K., Chen, H., & Wang, J. (2011). The relations of gender and personality traits on different creativities: a dual-process theory account. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(2), 112–23. doi:10.1037/a0026241Google Scholar
Long, C. R., & Greenwood, D. N. (2013). Joking in the face of death: a terror management approach to humor production. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 26, 493509. doi:10.1515/humor-2013-0012Google Scholar
Martin, R. (2003). Sense of Humor. In Lopez, S. J. & Snyder, C. R. (eds.), Positive Psychological Assessment: A Handbook of Models and Measures (pp. 313–26). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10612-020Google Scholar
Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, K. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(1), 4875. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00534–2Google Scholar
Martin, G. N., & Sullivan, E. (2013). Sense of humor across cultures: a comparison of British, Australian and American respondents. North American Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 375–84.Google Scholar
Masten, A. S. (1986). Humor and competence in school-aged children. Child Development, 57(2), 461–73. doi:10.2307/1130601Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2007). Brief versions of the NEO-PI-3. Journal of Individual Differences, 28(3), 116.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2008). The Five-Factor Theory of Personality. In John, O. P., Robins, R. W., & Pervin, L. A. (eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (3rd edn., pp. 159–81). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T. Jr., & Martin, T. A. (2005). The NEO-PI-3: a more readable revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84(3), 261–70. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8403_05Google Scholar
Mednick, S. A. (1968). The remote associates test. Journal of Creative Behavior, 2, 213–14. doi: 10.1002/j.2162–6057.1968.tb00104.xGoogle Scholar
Mickes, L., Walker, D. E., Parris, J. L., Mankoff, R., & Christenfeld, N. S. (2012). Who’s funny: gender stereotypes, humor production, and memory bias. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(1), 108–12. doi:10.3758/s13423-011–0161–2Google Scholar
Moran, J. M., Rain, M., Page-Gould, E., & Mar, R. A. (2014). Do I amuse you? Asymmetric predictors for humor appreciation and humor production. Journal of Research in Personality, 49, 813. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.12.002Google Scholar
Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). Are intelligence and creativity really so different? Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking. Intelligence, 39(1), 3645. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2010.11.002Google Scholar
Nusbaum, E. C., Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. E. (2014). Ready, set, create: effects of telling people to “be creative” on divergent thinking tasks. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(4), 423–32.Google Scholar
Nusbaum, E. C., Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. B. (in press). Ha ha? Assessing humor production ability and personality. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts.Google Scholar
Papousek, I., Schulter, G., Lackner, H. K., Samson, A., & Freudenthaler, H. H. (2014). Experimentally observed responses to humor are related to individual differences in emotion perception and regulation in everyday life. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 27(2), 271–86. doi:10.1515/humor-2014-0018Google Scholar
Plucker, J. A., Qian, M., & Wang, S. (2011). Is originality in the eye of the beholder? Comparison of scoring techniques in the assessment of divergent thinking. Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(1), 122.Google Scholar
Pretz, J. E., & McCollum, V. A. (2014). Self-perceptions of creativity do not always reflect actual creative performance. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 227–36. doi:10.1037/a0035597Google Scholar
Primi, R. (2014). Divergent productions of metaphors: combining many-facet Rasch measurement and cognitive psychology in the assessment of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 461–74.Google Scholar
Puryear, J. S., Kettler, T., & Rinn, A. N. (in press). Relationships of personality to differential conceptions of creativity: a systematic review. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. T., & Smith-Lovin, L. (2001). Getting a laugh: gender, status, and humor in task discussions. Social Forces, 80(1), 123–58. doi:10.1353/sof.2001.0085Google Scholar
Runco, M. A. (1986). Flexibility and originality in children’s divergent thinking. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 120(4), 345–52. doi:10.1080/00223980.1986.9712632Google Scholar
Schönbrodt, F. D., & Perugini, M. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize? Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 609–12.Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J. (2007). Knowledge-based assessment of expertise in the arts: exploring aesthetic fluency. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 247–49.Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J. (2015). Intelligence and creativity are pretty similar after all. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 599606.Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. E. (2012). Making creative metaphors: the importance of fluid intelligence for creative thought. Intelligence, 40, 343–51.Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J., Beaty, R. E., & Nusbaum, E. C. (2013). Verbal fluency and creativity: general and specific contributions of broad retrieval ability (Gr) factors to divergent thinking. Intelligence, 41, 328–40.Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J., Beaty, R. E., Nusbaum, E. C., Eddington, K. M., Levin-Aspenson, H., et al. (2014). Everyday creativity in daily life: an experience-sampling study of “little c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 183–8.Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2009). Is creativity domain-specific? Latent class models of creative accomplishments and creative self-descriptions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(3), 139–48. doi:10.1037/a0014940Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J., & Nusbaum, E. C. (2012). What’s your major? College majors as markers of creativity. International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 22(2), 3143.Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Berg, C., Martin, C., & O’Connor, A. (2009). Openness to experience, plasticity, and creativity: exploring lower-order, higher-order, and interactive effects. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1087–90.Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., et al. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 6885.Google Scholar
Skrondal, A., & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2004). Generalized Latent Variable Modeling: Multilevel, Longitudinal, and Structural Equation Models. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
Smith, E. E., & Goodchilds, J. D. (1963). The wit in large and small established groups. Psychological Reports, 13(1), 273–4. doi:10.2466/pr0.1963.13.1.273Google Scholar
Sneed, C. D., McCrae, R. R., & Funder, D. C. (1998). Lay conceptions of the five-factor model and its indicators. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(2), 115–26. doi:10.1177/0146167298242001Google Scholar
Thalmayer, A., Saucier, G., & Eigenhuis, A. (2011). Comparative validity of brief to medium-length Big Five and Big Six personality questionnaires. Psychological Assessment, 23(4), 9951009. doi:10.1037/a0024165Google Scholar
Torrance, E. (1974). Interscholastic brainstorming and creative problem solving competition for the creatively gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 18(1), 37.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (2008). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms – Technical Manual, Verbal Forms A and B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.Google Scholar
Torrance, E., & Haensly, P. A. (2003). Assessment of Creativity in Children and Adolescents. In Reynolds, C. R. & Kamphaus, R. W. (eds.), Handbook of Psychological and Educational Assessment of Children: Intelligence, Aptitude, and Achievement (2nd edn., pp. 584607). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Treadwell, Y. (1970). Humor and creativity. Psychological Reports, 26(1), 55–8. doi:10.2466/pr0.1970.26.1.55Google Scholar
Turner, R. G. (1980). Self-monitoring and humor production. Journal of Personality, 48(2), 163–72. doi:10.1111/j.1467–6494.1980.tb00825.xGoogle Scholar
Urban, K. K. (1991). On the development of creativity in children. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 177–91.Google Scholar
Veatch, T. C. (1998). A theory of humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 11(2), 161215. doi:10.1515/humr.1998.11.2.161Google Scholar
Walker, B. R., & Jackson, C. J. (2014). How the five factor model and revised reinforcement sensitivity theory predict divergent thinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 57, 54–8. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.09.011Google Scholar
Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of Thinking in Young Children: A Study of the Creativity-Intelligence Distinction. Oxford: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Wasti, S., Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., & Somer, O. (2008). Six Turkish personality factors and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(6), 665–84. doi:10.1177/0022022108323783Google Scholar
Weisfield, G. E., Nowak, N. T., Lacas, T., Weisfeld, C. C., Imamoğlu, E. O., et al. (2011). Do women seek humorousness in men because it signals intelligence? A cross-cultural test. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 24(4), 435–62. doi:10.1515/HUMR.2011.025Google Scholar
Wilson, R. C., Guilford, J. P., & Christensen, P. R. (1953). The measurement of individual differences in originality. Psychological Bulletin, 50(5), 362–70. doi:10.1037/h0060857Google Scholar
Wisniewski, E. J. (1997). Conceptual Combination: Possibilities and Esthetics. In Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Vaid, J. (eds.), Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes (pp. 5181). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Wolfradt, U., & Pretz, J. E. (2001). Individual differences in creativity: personality, story writing, and hobbies. European Journal of Personality, 15(4), 297310. doi:10.1002/per.409Google Scholar
Woo, S. E., Chernyshenko, O. S., Longley, A., Zhang, Z. X., Chiu, C. Y., et al. (2014). Openness to experience: its lower level structure, measurement, and cross-cultural equivalence. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 2945.Google Scholar
Ziller, R. C. (1990). Environment-self-behavior: a general theory of personal control. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 5, 227–42.Google Scholar
Zweyer, K., Velker, B., & Ruch, W. (2004). Do cheerfulness, exhilaration, and humor production moderate pain tolerance? A FACS study. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 17, 85119.Google Scholar

References

Aitken, S. C., & Wingate, J. (1993). A preliminary study of the self-directed photography of middle-class, homeless, and mobility-impaired children. Professional Geographer, 45, 6572.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: a consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 9971013.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Amerikaner, M., Schauble, P., & Ziller, R. C. (1980). Images: the use of photographs in personal counseling. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 59, 6873.Google Scholar
Ames, D. R., Rose, P., & Anderson, C. P. (2006). The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 440–50.Google Scholar
Aron, A., Aron, E., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596612.Google Scholar
Back, M. D., Stopfer, J. M., Vazire, S., Gaddis, S., Schmukle, S. C., et al. (2010). Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization. Psychological Science, 21, 372–4.Google Scholar
Baer, J. (1993). Creativity and Divergent Thinking: A Task-Specific Approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Barron, F. (1997). Introduction. In Barron, F., Montuori, A., & Barron, A. (eds.), Creators on Creating (pp. 121). New York: Tarcher-Putnam.Google Scholar
Barron, F, & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–76.Google Scholar
Beloff, H. (1988). The eye and the me: self-portraits of eminent photographers. Philosophical Psychology, 1, 295311.Google Scholar
Benet-Martínez, V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los cinco grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: multitrait multimethod analysis of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 729–50.Google Scholar
Berzonsky, M. D. (1989). Identity style: conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Adolescent Research, 4, 267–81.Google Scholar
Brody, N., & Ehrlichman, H. (1998). Personality Psychology: The Science of Individuality. Upple Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Brumfield, B. (2013, November 20). Selfie Named Word of the Year for 2013, available at www.cnn.com/2013/11/19/living/selfie-word-of-the-year/.Google Scholar
Burke, P. A., & Dollinger, S. J. (2005). “A picture’s worth a thousand words”: language use in the autophotographic essay. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 536–48.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306–7.Google Scholar
Casey, P. F., & Dollinger, S. J. (2007). College students’ alcohol-related problems: an autophotographic approach. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 52(2), 825.Google Scholar
Cheek, J. M. (1989). Identity Orientations and Self-Interpretation. In Buss, D. M. & Cantor, N. (eds.), Personality Psychology: Recent Trends and Emerging Directions (pp. 275–85). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Cheek, J. M., Tropp, L.R., Chen, L. C., & Underwood, M. K. (1994, August). Identity Orientations: Personal, Social, and Collective Aspects of Identity. Paper presented at the 102nd Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Christofides, E., Muise, A., & Desmarais, S. (2009). Information disclosure and control on Facebook: are they two sides of the same coin or two different processes? CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12, 341–5.Google Scholar
Clancy, S. M., & Dollinger, S. J. (1993). Photographic depictions of the self: gender and age differences in social connectedness. Sex Roles, 29, 477–95.Google Scholar
Combs, J., & Ziller, R. C. (1977). The photographic self-concept of counselees. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 24, 452–5.Google Scholar
Cook, C. A. (1996). An Autophotographic Study of Individuality and Social Relatedness: Relationship Closeness and Dissolution. Unpublished MA thesis, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory and NEO Five-Factor Inventory Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Damico, S. B. (1985). The two worlds of school: differences in the photographs of black and white adolescents. Urban Review, 17, 210–22.Google Scholar
DeMarie, D. (2010). Successful versus unsuccessful schools through the eyes of children: the use of interviews, autophotography, and picture selection. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 12 (no page numbers).Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J. (1996). Autophotographic identities of young adults: with special reference to alcohol, athletics, achievement, religion, and work. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 384–98.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J. (2001). Religious identity: an autophotographic study. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 11, 7192.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J. (2002). Physical attractiveness, social connectedness, and individuality: an autophotographic study. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 2532.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J. (2003). Need for uniqueness, need for cognition, and creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 37, 99116.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J. (2006). Autophotographic individuality predicts creativity: a seven-year follow-up. Journal of Creative Behavior, 40, 111–24.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J. (2007). Creativity and conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1025–35.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J. (2011). “Standardized minds” or individuality? Admissions tests and creativity revisited. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2011, 329–41.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J. (2016). “You are as you read”: do students’ reading interests contribute to their individuality? Reading Psychology, 37, 126.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J., Burke, P. A., & Gump, N. (2007). Creativity and values. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 91103.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J., & Clancy, S. M. (1993). Identity, self, and personality: II. Glimpses through the autophotographic eye. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 1064–71.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J., & Clancy Dollinger, S. M. (1997). Individuality and identity exploration: an autophotographic study. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 337–54.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J., & Clancy Dollinger, S. M. (2003). Individuality in young and middle adulthood: an autophotographic study. Journal of Adult Development, 10, 227–36.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J., & Clancy Dollinger, S. M. (in press). Creativity and Identity. In Maciej Karwowski & James C. Kaufman (eds.), The Creative Self: How Our Beliefs, Self Efficacy, Mindset and Identity Impact Our Creativity. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J., Cook, C. A., & Robinson, N. M. (1999a). Correlates of autophotographic individuality: therapy experience and loneliness. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 325–40.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J., Kazmierczak, E., & Storkerson, P. K. (2011). Creativity and self-exploration in projective drawings of abused women: evaluating the inside me-outside me workshop. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 6, 202–19.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J., Matyja, A. M., & Huber, J. L. (2008). Which factors best account for academic success: those which college students can control or those they cannot? Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 872–85.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J., Preston, L. A., O’Brien, S. P., & DiLalla, D. L. (1996). Individuality and relatedness of the self: an autophotographic study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1268–78.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J., Robinson, N. M., & Ross, V. J. (1999b). Photographic individuality, breadth of perspective, and creativity. Journal of Personality, 67, 623–44.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J., Ross, V. J., & Preston, L. A. (2002). Intellect and individuality. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 213–26.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J., Urban, K.K., & James, T. A. (2004). Creativity and openness: further validation of two creative product measures. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 3547.Google Scholar
Domino, G. (1976). Primary process thinking in dream reports as related to creative achievement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 929–32.Google Scholar
Dvorak, J. C. (2013). Age of the Selfie. PC Magazine Digital Edition, December 2013.Google Scholar
Eigenberger, M. E., & Sealander, K. A. (2001). A scale for measuring students anti-intellectualism. Psychological Reports, 89, 387402.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1994). Creativity and personality: word association, origence, and psychoticism. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 209–16.Google Scholar
Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290309.Google Scholar
Feist, G. J., & Brady, T. R. (2004). Openness to experience, non-conformity, and the preference for abstract art. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22, 7789.Google Scholar
Fiske, D. W. (1949). Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44, 329–44.Google Scholar
Ghiselli, E. E. (1960). Individuality as a factor in the success of management potential. Personnel Psychology, 13, 110.Google Scholar
Hartmann, E. (1991). Boundaries in the Mind: A New Psychology of Personality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Helson, R.(1996). In search of the creative personality. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 295306.Google Scholar
Helson, R., & Roberts, R. (1992). The personality of young adult couples and wives’ work patterns. Journal of Personality, 60, 575–97.Google Scholar
Henningham, J. P. (1996). A 12-item scale of social conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 517–19.Google Scholar
Henry, W. P., & Solano, C. H. (1983). Photographic style and personality: developing a coding system for photographs. Journal of Psychology, 115, 7987.Google Scholar
Hocevar, D. (1979, April). The Development of the Creative Behavior Inventory. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Rocky Mountain Psychological Association (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 170,350).Google Scholar
Hocevar, D. (1981). Measurement of creativity: review and critique. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 450–64.Google Scholar
Holland, J. L. (1985). Vocational Preference Inventory Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Ivcevic, Z., & Ambady, N. (2013). Face to (Face)book: the two faces of social behavior? Journal of Personality, 81, 290301.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. N. (1994). Jackson Personality Inventory–Revised. Port Huron, MI: Sigma Assessment Systems.Google Scholar
Johnsen, M., May, J., & Cloke, P. (2008). Imag(in)ing “homeless places”: using auto-photography to (re)examine the geographies of homelessness. Area, 40, 194207.Google Scholar
Jones, M. J. (2004). The effect of participation in the Neighborhood Academic Program on the autophotographic self-concepts of inner-city adolescents. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31, 188201.Google Scholar
Karl, K., Peluchette, J., & Schlaegel, C. (2010). Who’s posting Facebook faux pas? A cross-cultural examination of personality differences. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18, 174–86.Google Scholar
Kasof, J., Chen, C., Himsel, A., & Greenberger, E. (2007). Values and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 105–22.Google Scholar
King, L. A., Walker, L. M., & Broyles, S. J. (1996). Creativity and the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 189203.Google Scholar
Kluckholn, C., & Murray, H. A. (1953). Personality Formation: The Determinants. In Kluckholn, C., Murray, H. A., & Schneider, D. M. (eds.), Personality in Nature, Society and Culture (pp. 5367). New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Labouvie-Vief, G., Chiodo, L. M., Goguen, L. A., Diehl, M., & Orwoll, L. (1995). Representations of self across the life span. Psychology and Aging, 10, 404–15.Google Scholar
Lippa, R. (1997). The display of masculinity, femininity, and gender diagnosticity in self-descriptive photo essays. Journal of Personality, 65, 137–69.Google Scholar
Loevinger, J. (1976). Ego Development: Conceptions and Theories. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Loevinger, J., & Blasi, A. (1991). Development of the Self as Subject. In Strauss, J. & Goethals, G. R. (eds.), The Self: Interdisciplinary Approaches (pp. 150–67). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Lombard, M. (2013). Using auto-photography to understand place: reflections from research in urban informal settlements in Mexico. Area, 45, 2332.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, D. W (1962). The nature and nurture of creative talent. American Psychologist, 17, 484–95.Google Scholar
Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 551–8.Google Scholar
Marcus, B., Machilek, F., & Schütz, A., (2006). Personality in cyberspace: personal websites as media for personality expressions and impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 1014–31.Google Scholar
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954–69.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. (1993). Psychoticism, degeneration, and creativity. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 209–11.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. E. (1999). Fifty Years of Creativity Research. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 449–60). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McAdams, D. P. (1996). Alternative futures for the study of human individuality. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 374–88.Google Scholar
McCann, S. J. H. (2011). Conservatism, openness, and creativity: patents granted to residents of American states. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 339–45.Google Scholar
McClelland, D. C., & Steele, R. S. (1972). Motivation Workshops. New York: General Learning.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (1993–4). Openness to experience as a basic dimension of personality. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 13, 3955.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (1996). Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 323–37.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1997). Conceptions and Correlates of Openness to Experience. In Hogan, R., Johnson, J., & Briggs, S. (eds.), Handbook of Personality Psychology (pp. 825–47). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mealer, F. A. (1997). Autophotographic Individuality and the Lexical Five-Factor Model. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Merten, T. (1995). Factors influencing word-association responses: a reanalysis. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 249–63.Google Scholar
Milgram, S. (1977). The Image-Freezing Machine. In Milgram, S. (ed.), The Individual in a Social World: Essays and Experiments (pp. 339–50). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Monteiro, J. M. C., & Dollinger, S. J. (1998). An autophotographic study of poverty, collective orientation and identity among street children. Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 403–6.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Stokes, G. S., & Owens, W. A. (1990). Patterns of Life History: The Ecology of Human Individuality. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Murray, H. A. (1943). Thematic Apperception Test Manual. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E., & Booth, R. J. (2001). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC): LIWC2001 [computer software and manual]. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Phillips, S. T., & Ziller, R. C. (1997). Toward a theory and measure of the nature of nonprejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 420–34.Google Scholar
Plucker, J. A. (1999). Reanalyses of student responses to creativity checklists: evidence of content generality. Journal of Creative Behavior, 33, 126–37.Google Scholar
Rinne, T. G., Steel, G. D., & Fairweather, J. (2013). The role of Hofstede’s individualism in national-level creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 25, 129–36.Google Scholar
Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 6675.Google Scholar
Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-markers: a brief version of Goldberg’s unipolar Big Five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506–16.Google Scholar
Schutte, N. S., & Malouff, J. M. (2004). University student reading preferences in relation to the Big Five personality factors. Reading Psychology, 25, 273–95.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. In Zanna, M. P. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 126). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H., & Bardi, A. (2001). Value hierarchies across cultures: taking a similarities perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 268–90.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1990). Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 878–91.Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Berg, C., Martin, C., & O’Connor, A. (2009). Openness to experience, plasticity, and creativity: exploring lower-order, high-order, and interactive effects. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1087–90.Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J., Wigert, B., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Assessing creativity with self-report scales: a review and empirical evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 1934.Google Scholar
Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L. (1977). Abnormality as a positive characteristic: the development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86, 518–27.Google Scholar
Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L. (1980). Uniqueness: The Human Pursuit of Difference. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Spielberger, C. (1979). Preliminary Manual for the State-Trait Personality Inventory (STPI). Unpublished manual, University of South Florida, Center for Research in Behavioral Medicine and Health Psychology.Google Scholar
Steadman, I. (2014). Who owns your selfie? New Statesman, April 11–17, p. 18.Google Scholar
Storr, A. (1988). Solitude: A Return to the Self. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
Sullivan, E. T., Clark, W. W., & Tiegs, E. W. (1970). Short Form Test of Academic Aptitude. Monterey, CA: CTB/McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Suran, B. G. (1978). Oddballs: The Social Maverick and the Dynamics of Individuality. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Tyler, L. E. (1978). Individuality: Human Possibilities and Personal Choice in the Psychological Development of Men and Women. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Urban, K. K., & Jellen, H. G. (1991). Test for Creative Thinking: Drawing Production Manual. Frankfort, Germany: Swets Test Services.Google Scholar
Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of Thinking in Young Children: A Study of the Creativity–Intelligence Distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Wallach, M. A., & Wing, C. W. Jr. (1969). The Talented Student: A Validation of the Creativity–Intelligence Distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Wilson, G. D., Ausman, J., & Mathews, T. R. (1973). Conservatism and art preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 286–8.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. C., Guilford, J. P., & Christensen, P. R. (1953). The measurement of individual differences in originality. Psychological Bulletin, 50, 362–70.Google Scholar
Wortham, J. (2013). My Selfie, Myself. New York Times Sunday Review, October 19.Google Scholar
Yang, S. (2012). An autophotography of the young adult children of bereaved families in Korea. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 17, 111.Google Scholar
Yao, X., Wang, S., Dang, J., & Wang, L. (2012). The role of individualism-collectivism in the individual creative process. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 296303.Google Scholar
Ziller, R. C. (1990/2000). Photographing the Self. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Ziller, R. C., & Lewis, D. (1981). Orientations: self, social, and environmental percepts through auto-photography. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 338–43.Google Scholar
Ziller, R. C., & Rorer, B. A. (1985). Shyness-environment interaction: a view from the shy side through auto-photography. Journal of Personality, 53, 626–39.Google Scholar

References

Amabile, T. M. (1988). A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations. In Staw, B. M. & Cummings, L. L. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 123–67). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Baer, M. (2010). The strength-of-weak-ties perspective on creativity: a comprehensive examination and extension. Journal ofApplied Psychology, 95, 592601. doi: 10.1037/a0018761Google Scholar
Baer, M., Oldham, G., Jacobsohn, G., & Hollingshead, A. (2008). The personality composition of teams and creativity: the moderating role of team creative confidence. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 255–82. doi: 10.1002/j.2162–6057.2008.tb01299.xGoogle Scholar
Barrick, M. R., and Mount, M. K. (1991).The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 126. doi: 10.1111/j.1744–6570.1991.tb00688.xGoogle Scholar
Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–76. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.002255Google Scholar
Barry, B., & Stewart, G. (1997). Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: the role of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 6278. doi: 10.1037/0021–9010.82.1.62Google Scholar
Bell, S. T. (2007). Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 595615. doi: 10.1037/0021–9010.92.3.595Google Scholar
Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28, 238–56. doi:10.5465/AMR.2003.9416096Google Scholar
Bolin, A. U., & Neuman, G. A. (2006). Personality, process, and performance in interactive brainstorming groups. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20, 565–85. doi: 10.1007/s10869-005–9000-7Google Scholar
Bradley, B. H., Klotz, A. C., Postlethwaite, B. E., & Brown, K. G. (2012). Ready to rumble: how team personality composition and task conflict interact to improve performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 385–92. doi: 10.1037/a0029845Google Scholar
Burgelman, R. A., (2002). Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 325–57. doi: 10.2307/3094808Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380400. doi: 10.1037/h0040373Google Scholar
DeShon, R. P., & Gillespie, J. Z. (2005). A motivated action theory account of goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 10961127. doi: 10.1037/0021–9010.90.6.1096Google Scholar
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–8. doi: 10.1037/0003–066X.41.10.1040Google Scholar
Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2, 290309. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5Google Scholar
Ford, C., & Sullivan, D. M. (2004). A time for everything: how the timing of novel contributions influences project team outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 279–92. doi: 10.1002/job.241Google Scholar
George, J. M. (2007). Creativity in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 1, 439–77. doi: 10.1080/078559814Google Scholar
Gilson, L. L. (2008). Why Be Creative: A Review of the Practical Outcomes Associated with Creativity at the Individual, Group, and Organizational Levels. In Zhou, J. & Shalley, C. E. (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Creativity (pp. 303–22). New York: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Gilson, L. L., Lim, H. S., Litchfield, R. C., & Gilson, P. W. (2015). Creativity in Teams: A Key Building Block for Innovation and Entrepreneurship. In Shalley, C. E. & Zhou, J. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Creativity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship. Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199927678.013.0015Google Scholar
Gilson, L. L., & Madjar, N. (2011). Radical and incremental creativity: antecedents and processes. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 21–8. doi: 10.1037/a0017863Google Scholar
Gilson, L. L., Litchfield, R., & Gilson, P. W. (2014). An Examination of the Relationship between Time and Creativity. In Shipp, A. J. & Fried, Y. (eds.), Time and Work: Current Issues in Work and Organizational Psychology (pp. 141–62). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Glynn, M. A. (1996). Innovative genius: a framework for relating individual and organizational intelligences to innovation. Academy of Management Review, 21, 10811111. doi:10.5465/AMR.1996.9704071864Google Scholar
Gilson, L. L., Mathieu, J. E., Shalley, C. E., & Ruddy, T. M. (2005). Creativity and standardization: complementary or conflicting drivers of team effectiveness? Academy of Management Journal, 48, 521–31. doi:10.5465/amj.2005.17407916Google Scholar
Glynn, M. A. (1996). Innovative genius: a framework for relating individual and organizational intelligences to innovation. Academy of Management Review, 21, 10811111. doi:10.5465/AMR.1996.9704071864Google Scholar
Gong, Y., Kim, T. Y., Zhu, J., & Lee, D. R. (2013). A multilevel model of team goal orientation, information exchange, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 827–51. doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.0177Google Scholar
González-Romá, V., Fortes-Ferreira, L., & Peiró, J. M. (2009). Team climate, climate strength, and team performance: a longitudinal study. Journal of Occupatinal and Organizational Psychology, 82, 511–36. doi: 10.1348/096317908X370025Google Scholar
Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 13981405. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.37.8.1398Google Scholar
Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 693706. doi: 10.2307/20159793Google Scholar
Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. (1975). Group Tasks, Group Interaction Process, and Group Performance Effectiveness: A Review and Proposed Integration. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 4599). New York: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60248–8Google Scholar
Hargadon, A. B., & Bechky, B. A. (2006). When collections of creatives become creative collectives: a field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science, 17, 484500. doi: 0.1287/orsc.1060.0200Google Scholar
Harrison, S. H., & Rouse, E. D. (2014). Let’s dance! Elastic coordination in creative group work: a qualitative study of modern dancers. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 1256–83. doi: 10.5465/amj.2012.0343Google Scholar
Harvey, S. (2014). Creative synthesis: exploring the process of extraordinary group creativity. Academy of Management Review, 39, 324–43. doi: 10.5465/amr.2012.0224Google Scholar
He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15, 481–94. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0078Google Scholar
Hunter, S. T., & Cushenbery, L. (2014). Is being a jerk necessary for originality? Examining the role of disagreeableness in the sharing and utilization of original ideas. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30, 621. doi: 10.1007/s10869-014–9386-1Google Scholar
Jabri, M. M. (1991). The development of conceptually independent subscales in the measurement of modes of problem solving. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 975–83. doi: 10.1177/001316449105100417Google Scholar
Kirton, M. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: a description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622–9. doi: 10.1037/0021–9010.61.5.622Google Scholar
Kohn, N., Paulus, P., & Choi, Y. (2011). Building on the ideas of others: an examination of the idea combination process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 554–61. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.01.004Google Scholar
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A Multilevel Approach to Theory and Research in Organizations: Contextual, Temporal, and Emergent Processes. In Klein, K. J. & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (eds.), Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (pp. 390). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press: doi: 10.5897/PPR2013.0102.Google Scholar
Litchfield, R. C. (2008). Brainstorming reconsidered: a goal-based view. Academy of Management Review, 33, 649–68. doi:10.5465/AMR.2008.32465708Google Scholar
Madjar, N., Greenberg, E., & Chen, Z. (2011). Factors for radical creativity, incremental creativity, and routine, noncreative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 730–43. doi: 10.1037/a0022416Google Scholar
Mainemelis, C. (2010). Stealing fire: creative deviance in the evolution of new ideas. Academy of Management Review, 35, 558–78.Google Scholar
March, J. G. (1976). The Technology of Foolishness. In March, J. G. & Olsen, J. P. (eds.), Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations (pp. 6981). Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997–2007: a review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34, 410–76. doi: 10.1177/0149206308316061Google Scholar
Mathieu, J. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Donsbach, J. S., & Alliger, G. M. (2014). A review and integration of team composition models moving toward a dynamic and temporal framework. Journal of Management, 40, 130–60. doi:10.1177/0149206313503014Google Scholar
Mathisen, G. E., Martinsen, Ø., & Einarsen, S. (2008). The relationship between creative personality composition, innovative team climate, and team innovativeness: an input-process-output perspective. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 1331. doi:10.1002/j.2162–6057.2008.tb01078.xGoogle Scholar
McCrae, R.R.(1987).Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personaity and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–65. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.52.6.1258Google Scholar
Miron-Spektor, E., Erez, M., & Naveh, E. (2011). The effect of conformists and attentive-to-detail members on team innovation: reconciling the innovation paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 740–60. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2011.64870100Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 107–20. doi:10.1080/10400419.2003.9651408Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 2743. doi: 10.1037/0033–2909.103.1.27Google Scholar
Murnighan, J. K., & Conlon, D. E. (1991). The dynamics of intense work groups: a study of British string quartets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 165–85. doi: 10.2307/2393352Google Scholar
Ohly, S., Sonnentag, S., & Pluntke, F. (2006). Routinization, work characteristics and their relationships with creative and proactive behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 257–79. doi: 10.1002/job.376Google Scholar
Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied Imagination. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Paulus, P. B., Dzindolet, M. T., Poletes, G., & Camacho, L. M. (1993). Perception of performance in group brainstorming: the illusion of group productivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 7889. doi:10.1177/0146167293191009Google Scholar
Peeters, M. A. G., Van Tuijl, H. F. J. M., Rutte, C. G., & Reymen, I. M. M. J. (2006). Personality and team performance: a meta-analysis. European Journal of Personality, 20, 377–96. doi: 0.1002/per.588Google Scholar
Perry-Smith, J. E., & Shalley, C. E. (2014). A social composition view of team creativity: the role of member nationality heterogeneous ties outside the team. Organization Science, 25, 1434–52. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2014.0912Google Scholar
Pirola-Merlo, A. (2010). Agile innovation: the role of team climate in rapid research and development. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 1075–84. doi: 10.1348/096317909X480653Google Scholar
Reinig, B. A., Briggs, R. O., and Nunamaker, J. F. Jr. (2007). On the measurement of ideation quality. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23, 143–61. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222230407Google Scholar
Reiter-Palmon, R., Wigert, B., & Vreede, T. d. (2012). Team Creativity and Innovation: The Effect of Group Composition, Social Processes, and Cognition. In Michael, D. M. (ed.), Handbook of Organizational Creativity (pp. 295326). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305310. doi:10.2307/20342603.Google Scholar
Robert, C., & Cheung, Y. H. (2010). An examination of the relationship between conscientiousness and group performance on a creative task. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 222–31. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2010.01.005Google Scholar
Schilpzand, M. C., Herold, D. M., & Shalley, C. E. (2011). Members’ openness to experience and teams’ creative performance. Small Group Research, 42, 5576. doi:10.1177/1046496410377509Google Scholar
Shalley, C. E. (1991). Effects of productivity goals, creativity goals, and personal discretion on individual creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 179–85. doi: 10.1037/0021–9010.76.2.179Google Scholar
Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 933–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007Google Scholar
Somech, A., & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2013). Translating team creativity to innovation implementation: the role of team composition and climate for innovation. Journal of Management, 39, 684708. doi: 10.1177/014920631039418Google Scholar
Taggar, S. (2002). Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: a multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 315–30. doi: 10.2307/3069349Google Scholar
Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 500–17. doi: 10.1037/0021–9010.88.3.500Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14, 516–31. doi:10.5465/AMR.1989.4308376Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1998). Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organization Science, 9, 543–55. doi: 10.1287/orsc.9.5.543Google Scholar
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 293321. doi:10.2307/258761Google Scholar
Zack, M. H. (2000). Jazz improvisation and organizing: once more from the top. Organization Science, 11, 227–34. doi: 10.1287/orsc.11.2.227.12507Google Scholar
Zhou, J., & Shalley, C. E. (2011). Deepening Our Understanding of Creativity in the Workplace: A Review of Different Approaches to Creativity Research. In Zedeck, S. (ed.), APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1: Building and Developing the Organization (pp. 275302). Washington, DC. American Psychogical Association. doi: 10.1037/12169-009Google Scholar

References

Ahmetoglu, G., Leutner, F., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2011). EQ-Nomics: understanding the relationship between individual differences in trait emotional intelligence and entrepreneurship. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 1028–33.Google Scholar
Akhtar, R., Ahmetoglu, G., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2013). Greed is good? Assessing the relationship between entrepreneurship and subclinical psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 420–5.Google Scholar
Adler, P., & Kwon, S. (2002). Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27, 1740.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Ray, S. (2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1), 105123.Google Scholar
Babiak, P., & Hare, R. D. (2006). Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go to Work. New York: Regan Books/HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Baer, M. (2010). The strength-of-weak-ties perspective on creativity: a comprehensive examination and extension. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 592.Google Scholar
Bessant, J., Alexander, A., Tsekouras, G., Rush, H., & Lamming, R. (2012). Developing innovation capability through learning networks. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(5), 10871112.Google Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). UCINET for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., & Halgin, D. S. (2011). On network theory. Organisation Science, 22(5), 1168–81.Google Scholar
Brands, R. A. (2013). Cognitive social structures in social network research: a review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 103, 82103.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–99.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S., Kilduff, M., & Tasselli, S. (2013). Social network analysis: foundations and frontiers on advantage. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 527–47.Google Scholar
Busenitz, L. W., & Barney, J. B. (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: biases and heuristics in strategic decision- making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(1), 930.Google Scholar
Chell, E. (2008). The Entrepreneurial Personality: A Social Construction. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Chell, E., & Baines, S. (2000). Networking, entrepreneurship and microbusiness behavior. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 12, 195215.Google Scholar
Chrisman, J. J., Bauerschmidt, A., & Hofer, C. W. (1998). The determinants of new venture performance: an extended model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23, 530.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95121.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). NEO Personality Inventory Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
De Carolis, D. M., Litzky, B. E., & Eddleston, K. A. (2009). Why networks enhance the progress of new venture creation: the influence of social capital and cognition. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(2), 527–45.Google Scholar
De Carolis, D. M., & Saparito, P. (2006). Social capital, cognition, and entrepreneurial opportunities: a theoretical framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 4156.Google Scholar
Dekker, D., Krackhardt, D., & Snijders, T. A. (2007). Sensitivity of MRQAP tests to collinearity and autocorrelation conditions. Psychometrika, 72(4), 563–81.Google Scholar
Engelen, A., Neumann, C., & Schwens, C. (in press). “Of course I can”: The Effect of CEO Overconfidence on Entrepreneurially Oriented Firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363406.Google Scholar
Garavan, T. N., & O’Cinneide, B. (1994). Entrepreneurship education and training programmes: a review and evaluation, Part 1. Journal of European Industrial Training, 18(8), 312.Google Scholar
Gündogdu, M. C. (2012). Re-thinking entrepreneurship, intrapreneurship, and innovation: a multi-concept perspective. Social and Behavioural Sciences, 41, 296303.Google Scholar
Gupta, V., Macmillan, I. C., & Surie, G. (2004). Entrepreneurial leadership: developing and measuring a cross-cultural construct. Journal of Business Venturing, 19 (2), 241–60.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78 (6), 1360–80.Google Scholar
Hisrich, R., Langan-Fox, J., & Grant, S. (2007). Entrepreneurship research and practice: a call to action for psychology. American Psychologist, 62(6), 575.Google Scholar
Hisrich, R. D., Peters, M. P., & Sheperd, D. A. (2005). Entrepreneurship (6th edn.). NewYork: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.Google Scholar
Hmieleski, K., & Ensley, M. (2007). A contextual examination of new venture performance: entrepreneur leadership behavior, top management team heterogeneity, and environmental dynamism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 865–89.Google Scholar
Hogan, J., & Roberts, B. W. (1996). Issues and non-issues in the fidelity-bandwidth trade-off. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17(6), 627–37.Google Scholar
Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128–45.Google Scholar
Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits – self- esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability – with job satisfaction and job performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 8092.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. (2009). Beyond big and little: the Four-C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 112.Google Scholar
Kets de Vries, M. F. (1985). The dark side of entrepreneurship. Harvard Business Review, 63(6), 160–7.Google Scholar
Klein, K. J., Lim, B., Saltz, J. L., & Mayer, D. M. (2004). How do they get there? An examination of the antecedents of centrality in team networks. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 952–63.Google Scholar
Kuratko, D. F. (2007). Entrepreneurial leadership in the 21st century: guest editor’s perspective. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 13(4), 111.Google Scholar
Krackhardt, D. (1990). Assessing the political landscape: structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2), 342–69.Google Scholar
Kratzer, J., Leenders, R. T. A., & Van Engelen, J. M. (2010). The social network among engineering design teams and their creativity: a case study among teams in two product development programs. International Journal of Project Management, 28(5), 428–36.Google Scholar
Leutner, F., Ahmetoglu, G., Akhtar, R., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2014). The relationship between the entrepreneurial personality and the Big Five personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 63, 5863.Google Scholar
Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: a source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 3644.Google Scholar
Martinez, M. A., & Aldrich, H. E. (2011). Networking strategies for entrepreneurs: balancing cohesion and diversity. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 17(1), 738.Google Scholar
McKenzie, B., Ugbah, S. D., & Smothers, N. (2007). ‘Who is an entrepreneur?’ Is it still the wrong question? Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 13, 2343.Google Scholar
Moscoso, S., & Salgado, J. F. (2004). “Dark side” personality styles as predictors of task, contextual, and job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12(4), 356–62.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Blair, C., Dailey, L., Leritz, L. E., & Osburn, H. K. (2006). Errors in creative thought? Cognitive biases in a complex processing activity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 40(2), 75109.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 2743.Google Scholar
Murmann, J. P., & Sardana, D. (2013). Successful entrepreneurs minimize risk. Australian Journal of Management, 38(1), 191215.Google Scholar
Ng, W., & Rieple, A. (2014). Special issue on “The role of networks in entrepreneurial performance: new answers to old questions?” International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(3), 19.Google Scholar
Otte, E., & Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science, 28(6), 441–53.Google Scholar
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–63.Google Scholar
Pentland, A. (2014). Social Physics: How Good Ideas Spread – The Lessons from a New Science. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Petrides, K. V., & Furnham, A. (2001). Trait emotional intelligence: psychometric investigation with reference to established trait taxonomies. European Journal of Personality, 15, 425–48.Google Scholar
Plucker, J., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potential, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 8396.Google Scholar
Prodan, I. (2007). A model of technological entrepreneurship. In Thérin, F. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Techno-Entrepreneurship, (pp. 2638). London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Rauch, A., & Frese, M. (2007). Let’s put the person back into entrepreneurship research: a meta-analysis on the relationship between business owners’ personality traits, business creation, and success. European Journal of Work and Organisational Psychology, 16, 353–85.Google Scholar
Read, S., & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2005). Knowing what to do and doing what you know: effectuation as a form of entrepreneurial expertise. Journal of Private Equity, 9(1), 4562.Google Scholar
Ruef, M., Aldrich, H. E., & Carter, N. M. (2003). The structure of founding teams: homophily, strong ties, and isolation among US entrepreneurs. American Sociological Review, 68(2), 195222.Google Scholar
Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., & Macey, W. H. (2013). Organisational climate and culture. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 361–88.Google Scholar
Schroeder, R. G., Buckman, J., & Cardozo, R. N., (1996). New Value Creation: The Next Development in Quality Management. White paper, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. (1934). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (Vol. 14). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Shane, S. A. (2008). The Illusions of Entrepreneurship: The Costly Myths That Entrepreneurs, Investors, and Policy Makers Live By. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448–69.Google Scholar
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Journal, 25(1), 217–26.Google Scholar
Shaver, K. G., & Scott, L. R. (1991). Person, process, choice: the psychology of new venture creation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(2), 2345.Google Scholar
Sun, R., & Wilson, N. (2014). A model of personality should be a cognitive architecture itself. Cognitive Systems Research, 29, 130.Google Scholar
Stewart, W. H., & Roth, P. L. (2001). Risk propensity differences between entrepreneurs and managers: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 145.Google Scholar
Thornberry, N. (2001). Corporate entrepreneurship: antidote or oxymoron? European Management Journal, 19(5), 526–33.Google Scholar
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 277.Google Scholar
Venkataraman, S. (1997). The Distinctive Domain of Entrepreneurship Research: An Editor’s Perspective. In Katz, J. & Brockhaus, R. (eds.), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth, Vol. 3. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Witt, P. (2004). Entrepreneurs’ networks and the success of start-ups. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 16(5), 391412.Google Scholar
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organisational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 293321.Google Scholar
Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Drory, A. (2006). Handbook of Organizational Politics. New York: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Zhao, H., & Seibert, S. E. (2006). The Big Five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: a meta-analytical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 259–71.Google Scholar
Zhou, J., Shin, S. J., Brass, D. J., Choi, J., & Zhang, Z.-X. (2009). Social networks, personal values, and creativity: evidence for curvilinear and interaction effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1544–52.Google Scholar

References

Alencar, E. M. L. S. (1975). Efeitos de um programa de criatividade em alunos de 4ª e 5ª séries [Effects of a creativity program on fourth and fifth grade students]. Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia, 27, 315.Google Scholar
Alencar, E. M. L. S. (1986). Efeitos de um programa de treinamento de professores de primeiro grau para a estimulação das habilidades de pensamento criativo [Effects of a training program of elementary school teachers for enhancing creative thinking abilities]. Brasília, Brazil: Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais.Google Scholar
Alencar, E. M. L. S. (1992, October). Efeitos de um programa de treinamento de criatividade nas habilidades de pensamento criativo de estudantes do ensino de segundo grau [Effects of a creativity training program on secondary school students’ creative thinking abilities]. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Brazilian Society of Psychology, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.Google Scholar
Alencar, E. M. L. S., Araújo, M. L. M., Fleith, D. S., & Rodrigues, M. A. M. (1988). Efeitos de um programa de treinamento de criatividade nas habilidades de pensamento criativo do professor e em seu comportamento em sala de aula [Effects of a creativity training program on teachers’ creative thinking abilities and classroom behavior]. Brasília, Brazil: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico.Google Scholar
Alencar, E. M. L. S., & Fleith, D. S. (1987). Avaliação de um programa de treinamento de criatividade por professores do ensino de primeiro grau [Evaluation of a creativity training program by elementary school teachers]. Forum Educacional, 11, 5163.Google Scholar
Alencar, E. M. L. S., & Fleith, D. S. (2009). Criatividade: Múltiplas perspectivas [Creativity: Multiple perspectives]. Brasilia, Brazil: EDUnB.Google Scholar
Alencar, E. M. L. S., Fleith, D. S., & Rodrigues, M. A. M. (1987). Avaliação à médio prazo de um programa de treinamento de criatividade para professores do ensino de primeiro grau [Short term evaluation of a creativity training program for elementary school teachers]. Estudos de Psicologia, 7, 7997.Google Scholar
Alencar, E. M. L. S., Fleith, D. S., Shimabukuro, L., & Nobre, M. A. (1987). Efeitos de um programa de treinamento de criatividade para professores do ensino de primeiro grau nas habilidades de pensamento criativo do aluno [Effects of a creativity training program for elementary school teachers on their students’ creative thinking abilities]. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 21, 5671.Google Scholar
Alencar, E. M. L. S., & Virgolim, A. M. R. (1990, October). Desenvolvimento de habilidades criativas em estudantes universitários [Development of creative abilities of university students]. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Brazilian Society of Psychology, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.Google Scholar
Al-Qaisy, L. M., & Turki, J. (2011). Adolescents creativity, self-concept and achievement motivation. British Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, 2, 88101.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Baer, J. (2010). Is Creativity Domain Specific? In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 321–41). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Bridging generality and sepcificity: the amusement park theoretical (APT) model of creativity. Roeper Review, 27, 158–63.Google Scholar
Bragotto, D. (1994). Programa experimental para o desenvolvimento da expressão poética em adolescentes [Experimental program for the development of poetic expression in adolescentes]. Unpublished master’s thesis, Catholic University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.Google Scholar
Cropley, A. J. (2005). Creativity in Education and Learning. A Guide to Teachers and Educators. Abingdon: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a Systems Perspective for the Study of Creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 313–35). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fadel, S. J., & Wechsler, S. M. (2011). Criatividade na universidade: Potencialidade e possibilidades de transformação [Creativity at the university: Potentialities and possibilities of transformation]. In Wechsler, S. M. & Nakano, T. C. (eds.), Criatividade na educação superior: Uma perspectiva internacional [Creativity in higher education: An international perspective] (pp. 202–35). São Paulo: Vetor.Google Scholar
Feist, G. J. (2004). The Evolved Fluid Specificity of Human Creative Talent. In Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Singer, J. L. (eds.), Creativity. From Potential to Realization (pp. 5782). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Feist, G. J. (2010). The Function of Personality in Creativity: The Nature and Nurture of the Creative Personality. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 113–30). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fleith, D. S. (1990). Efeitos de um programa de treinamento em estudantes normalistas [Effects of a creativity training program on teacher trainees] Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Brasília, Brazil.Google Scholar
Fleith, D. S. (2011). Creativity in the Brazilian culture. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 4(3). doi: 10.9707/2307-0919.1037Google Scholar
Fleith, D. S., Renzulli, J. S., & Westberg, K. L. (2002). Effects of a creativity training program on divergent thinking abilities and self-concept in monolingual and bilingual classrooms. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 373–86.Google Scholar
Garaigordobil, M. L. (1999). Assessment of cooperative-creative program of assertive behavior and self-concept. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 2, 310.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, F. C., & Fleith, D. S. (2011). Estudo comparativo entre alunos superdotados e não-superdotados em relação à inteligência e criatividade [Comparative study between gifted and non gifted students in relation to intelligence and creativity]. Psico, 42, 263–8.Google Scholar
Gras, R. M. L., Bordoy, M., Ballesta, G. J., & Berna, J. C. (2010). Creativity, intellectual abilities and response styles: implications for academic performance in the secondary school. Anales de Psicología, 26, 212–19.Google Scholar
Guerreiro, M. C. R. F. (1987). Treinamento de professores para adaptação do currículo escolar aos estilos cognitivos de alunos repetentes [Training of teachers for cognitive styles school curriculum adaptation of underachiever students]. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Brasília, Brazil.Google Scholar
Hennessay, B. A. (2010). The Creativity-Motivation Connection. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 342–66). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2004). Hawking’s Haiku, Madonna Math: Why It Is Hard to Be Creative in Every Room of the House. In Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Singer, J. L. (eds.), Creativity: From Potential to Realization (pp. 319). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Lau, S., Li, C. S., & Chu, D. (2004). Perceived creativity: its relationship to social status and self-concept among Chinese high ability children. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 5967.Google Scholar
Lubart, T. (2007). Psicologia da criatividade [Psychology of creativity]. Porto Alegre, Brazil: Artmed.Google Scholar
Ma, H.-H. (2006). A synthetic of the effectiveness of single components and packages in creativity training programs. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 435–46.Google Scholar
Marin, A. J. (1976). Educação, arte e criatividade [Education, arts and creativity]. São Paulo: Pioneira.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. (1989). Personality, Situation, and Creativity. In Glover, J. A., Ronning, R. R., & Reynolds, C. R. (eds.), Handbook of Creativity: Perspectives on Individual Differences (pp. 211–32). New York: Plenun Press.Google Scholar
Mendonça, P. V. C. F. (2012). Treinamento de criatividade com professores: Efeitos na criatividade e no rendimento escolar de alunos com e sem transtorno de déficit de atenção e hiperatividade [Creativity training for teachers: Effects on creativity and school performance of students with and without attention deficit disorder and hyperactivity]. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Brasília, Brazil.Google Scholar
Mendonça, P. V. C. F., & Fleith, D. S. (2005). Relação entre criatividade, inteligência e autoconceito entre alunos monolíngues e bilíngues [Relationship between creativity, intelligence and self-concept of monolingual and bilingual students]. Psicologia Escolar Educacional, 9, 3746.Google Scholar
Nakano, T. C. (2011). Programas de treinamento em criatividade: Conhecendo as práticas e resultados [Creativity training programs: Knowing practices and results]. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, 15, 311–22.Google Scholar
Nakano, T. C. (2012). Criatividade e inteligência em crianças: Habilidades relacionadas? [Creativity and intelligence in children: Related abilities?]. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 28, 149–60.Google Scholar
Neves-Pereira, M. S. (1996). Efeitos de um treinamento de criatividade no desempenho escolar e nas habilidades criativas de crianças com dificuldades de aprendizagem [Effects of a creativity training on learning disabled students’ creative abilities and school performance]. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Brasília, Brazil.Google Scholar
Parnes, S. (1970). Education and Creativity. In Vernon, P. E. (ed.), Creativity (pp. 341–54). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rose, L. H., & Lin, H. (1984). A meta-analysis of long-term creativity training programs. Journal of Creative Behavior, 18, 1122.Google Scholar
Santos, F. C. G. (2014). Intervenção em criatividade com professoras e mães: Efeitos no rendimento escolar, autoconceito, motivação e criatividade de alunos do 3º ano do ensino fundamental [Creativity intervention with teachers and mothers: effects on school performance, self-concept, motivation, and creativity of third grade students]. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Brasília, Brazil.Google Scholar
Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-markers: a brief version of Goldberg’s unipolar Big Five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506–16.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation (2nd edn.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004a). The effectiveness of creativity training: a quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 361–88.Google Scholar
Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004b). Types of creativity training: approaches and their effectiveness. Journal of Creative Behavior, 3, 149–79.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1999). Creativity from a Historiometric Perspective. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 116–33). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Siqueira, L. G. G., & Wechsler, S. M. (2004). Estilos de pensar e criar de estudantes brasileiros e sua influência sobre o desempenho escolar [Brazilian students’ thinking and creative styles and the influence on school performance]. Revista Ibero-Americana de Diagnóstico e Avaliação Psicológica, 18, 6177.Google Scholar
Starko, A. J. (1995). Creativity in the Classroom. Schools of Curious Delight. White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Studer-Luetti, B., Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., & Perrig, W. J. (2012). Influence of neuroticism and conscientiousness on working memory training outcome. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 44–9.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1972). Can we teach children to think creatively? Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 114–43.Google Scholar
Wechsler, S. M. (1987). Efeitos do treinamento de criatividade em crianças bem-dotadas e regulares do primeiro grau [Effects of the creativity training in elementary gifted and non-gifted students]. Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia, 39, 95111.Google Scholar
Wechsler, S. M., Nunes, M. F. O., Schelini, P. W., Ferreira, A. A., & Pereira, D. A. P. (2010). Criatividade e inteligência: Analisando semelhanças e discrepâncias no desenvolvimento [Creativity and intelligence: analyzing similarities and discrepancies in the development]. Estudos de Psicologia, 15, 243–50.Google Scholar
Wechsler, S. M., & Souza, V. L. T. (eds.) (2011). Criatividade e aprendizagem [Creativity and learning]. São Paulo: Edições Loyola.Google Scholar

References

Barron, F. (1955). The disposition towards originality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 478–85.Google Scholar
DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Cybernetic Big Five theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 3358.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Genius: The Natural History of Creativity. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1908/1959). Creative Writers and Daydreaming. In Strachey, J. (ed.). The Standard Edition of the Complete Works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 9, pp. 143–53). London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Fromm, E. (1959). The Creative Attitude. In Anderson, H. H. (ed.), Creativity and Its Cultivation (pp. 4454). New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 2642.Google Scholar
Gough, H. G. (1976). What happens to creative medical students? Journal of Medical Education, 51, 461–7.Google Scholar
Helson, R. (1971). Women mathematicians and the creative personality. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 36, 210–20.Google Scholar
Jung, C. G. (1923). On the relation of analytic psychology to poetic art. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 3, 213–31.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: the four-C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 112.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, D. W. (1978). In Search of Human Effectiveness. Buffalo, NY: Bearly.Google Scholar
Maslow, A. (1959). Creativity in Self-Actualizing People. In Anderson, H. H. (ed.), Creativity and Its Cultivation (pp. 8395). New York: Harper.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509–16.Google Scholar
Rhodes, M. (1962). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305–11.Google Scholar
Rogers, C. (1959). Toward a Theory of Creativity. In Anderson, H. H. (ed.), Creativity and Its Cultivation (pp. 6982). New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1972). A Lecture on “Having” a Poem. In Skinner, B. F., Cumulative Record: A Selection of Papers (3rd edn.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×