Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 2
  • Print publication year: 2019
  • Online publication date: February 2019

8 - Learning Sciences for Computing Education

from Part II - Foundations
Alexander, P. A., Schallert, D. L., & Reynolds, R. E. (2009). What is learning anyway? A topographical perspective considered. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 176192.
Almstrum, V. L., Hazzan, O., Guzdial, M., & Petre, M. (2005). Challenges to computer science education research. In Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 191192). New York: ACM.
Anderson, J. R. (1996). ACT: A simple theory of complex cognition. American Psychologist, 51(4), 355.
Barab, S. (2014). Design-based research: A methodological toolkit for engineering change. In Keith Sawyer, R. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, 2nd edn. (pp. 151170). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 114.
Ben-David Kolikant, Y., & Ben-Ari, M. (2008). Fertile zones of cultural encounter in computer science education. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(1), 132.
Bender, E., & Gray, D. (1999). The scholarship of teaching. Research and Creative Activity, 12(1). Retrieved from www.indiana.edu/~rcapub/v22n1/p03.html
Blackwell, A. F. (2002). First steps in programming: A rationale for attention investment models. In Human Centric Computing Languages and Environments (pp. 210). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246263.
Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2 (2), 141178.
Bruner, J. S. (1973). Beyond the information given. In Anglin, J. M. (Ed.), Beyond the Information Given: Studies in the Psychology of Knowing (pp. 143175). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., DiSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 913.
Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In New directions in Educational Technology (pp. 1522). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser, 18, 3242.
Collins, A., & Kapur, M. (2014). Cognitive apprenticeship. In Keith Sawyer, R. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, 2nd edn. (pp. 109127). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cooper, S., & Cunningham, S. (2010). Teaching computer science in context. ACM Inroads, 1(1), 58.
Design-Based Research Collective (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 58.
Deitrick, E., O’Connell, B., & Shapiro, R. B. (2014). The discourse of creative problem solving in childhood engineering education. In Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 591598). Boulder, CO: ISLS.
Deitrick, E., Shapiro, R. B., Ahrens, M. P., Fiebrink, R., Lehrman, P. D., & Farooq, S. (2015). Using distributed cognition theory to analyze collaborative computer science learning. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 5160). New York: ACM.
Deitrick, E., Shapiro, R. B., & Gravel, B. (2016). How do we assess equity in programming pairs? Singapore. In Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 370–7). Singapore: ISLS.
DiSessa, A. A. (1991). Local sciences: Viewing the design of human–computer systems as cognitive science. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Designing Interaction: psychology at the human-computer interface (pp. 162202). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
DiSalvo, B. J., & Bruckman, A. (2009). Questioning video games’ influence on CS interest. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games (pp. 272278). New York: ACM.
DiSalvo, B., & Bruckman, A. (2010). Race and gender in play practices: Young African American males. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (pp. 5663). New York: ACM.
DiSalvo, B. J., Crowley, K., & Norwood, R. (2008). Learning in context: Digital games and young black men. Games and Culture, 3(2), 131141.
DiSalvo, B., Guzdial, M., Meadows, C., Perry, K., McKlin, T., & Bruckman, A. (2013). Workifying games: Successfully engaging African American gamers with computer science. In Proceedings of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 317322). New York: ACM.
DiSalvo, B., Yardi, S., Guzdial, M., McKlin, T., Meadows, C., Perry, K., & Bruckman, A. (2011). African American men constructing computing identity. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 29672970). New York: ACM.
Eccles, J. S. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In Spence, J. T. (Ed.), Achievement and Achievement Motives (pp. 75146). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
Eccles, J. S. (1987). Gender roles and women’s achievement-related decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11(2), 135172.
Edelson, D. C. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 105–21.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 124.
Esmonde, I. (2017). Power and sociocultural theories of learning. In Esmonde, I. & Booker, A. (Eds.), Power and Privilege in the Learning Sciences: Critical and Sociocultural Theories of Learning (p. 6). New York: Routledge.
Greeno, J. G., & Engeström, Y. (2014). Learning in activity. In Keith Sawyer, R. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, 2nd edn. (pp. 128150). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Guzdial, M. (2003). A media computation course for non-majors. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 35(3), 104108.
Guzdial, M. (2010). Does contextualized computing education help? ACM Inroads, 1(4), 46.
Guzdial, M., & Tew, A. E. (2006). Imagineering inauthentic legitimate peripheral participation: An instructional design approach for motivating computing education. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Computing Education Research (pp. 5158). New York: ACM.
Hermes, M., Bang, M., & Marin, A. (2012). Designing Indigenous language revitalization. Harvard Educational Review, 82(3), 381402.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99107.
Hoadley, C. M. (2004). Methodological alignment in design-based research. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 203212.
Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326, 14101412.
Hutchings, P., & Shulman, L. S. (1999). The scholarship of teaching: New elaborations, new developments. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 31(5), 1015.
Kafai, Y. B. (1995). Minds in Play. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kafai, Y. B., & Burke, Q. (2014). Connected Code: Why Children Need to Learn Programming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kafai, Y. B., Lee, E., Searle, K., Fields, D., Kaplan, E., & Lui, D. (2014). A crafts-oriented approach to computing in high school: Introducing computational concepts, practices, and perspectives with electronic textiles. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 14, 1.
Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. A. (2006). Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction, 26(3), 379424.
Kapur, M. (2014). Productive failure in learning math. Cognitive Science, 38(5), 10081022.
Kapur, M. (2015). The preparatory effects of problem solving versus problem posing on learning from instruction. Learning and Instruction, 39, 2331.
Kapur, M., & Bielaczyc, K. (2012). Designing for productive failure. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(1), 4583.
Kelleher, C., Pausch, R., & Kiesler, S. (2007). Storytelling Alice motivates middle school girls to learn computer programming. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 14551464). New York: ACM.
Kelly, A., Finch, L., Bolles, M., & Shapiro, R.B. (2018). BlockyTalky: New programmable tools to enable students learning networks. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 18, 818.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 7586.
Kolodner, J. L. (2004). The learning sciences: Past, present, and future. Educational Technology: The Magazine for Managers of Change in Education, 44(3), 3742.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lishinski, A., Good, J., Sands, P., & Yadav, A. (2016). Methodological rigor and theoretical foundations of CS education research. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 161169). New York: ACM.
Malmi, L., Sheard, J., Bednarik, R., Helminen, J., Kinnunen, P., Korhonen, A., … Taherkhani, A. (2014). Theoretical underpinnings of computing education research: what is the evidence? In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 2734). New York: ACM.
Maloney, J., Burd, L., Kafai, Y., Rusk, N., Silverman, B., & Resnick, M. (2004). Scratch: A sneak preview [education]. In Creating, Connecting and Collaborating through Computing. (pp. 104109). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking the Clubhouse. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Margolis, J., Estella, R., Goode, J., Holme, J., & Nao, K. 2008. Stuck in the Shallow End: Education, Race, and Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Margulieux, L. E., Guzdial, M., & Catrambone, R. (2012). Subgoal-labeled instructional material improves performance and transfer in learning to develop mobile applications. In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 7178). New York: ACM.
Margulieux, L., Morrison, B. B., Guzdial, M., & Catrambone, R. (2016). Training learners to self-explain: Designing instructions and examples to improve problem solving. In Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 98105). Singapore: ISLS.
Morrison, B. B., Decker, A., & Margulieux, L. E. (2016). Learning loops: A replication study illuminates impact of HS courses. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 221330). New York: ACM.
Morrison, B. B., Margulieux, L. E., & Guzdial, M. (2015). Subgoals, context, and worked examples in learning computing problem solving. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 2129). New York: ACM.
Nathan, M. J., Rummel, N., & Hay, K. E. (2016). Growing the learning sciences: Brand or big tent? Implications for graduate education. In Evans, M. A., Packer, M. J., & Sawyer, R. K. (Eds.), Reflections on the Learning Sciences (pp. 191209). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Nathan, M. J., & Sawyer, R. K. (2014). Foundations of the learning sciences. In Sawyer, R. Keith (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, 2nd edn. (pp. 2143). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Orton, K., Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Jona, K., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Bringing computational thinking into high school mathematics and science classrooms. In Proceeding of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 705712). Singapore: ISLS.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
Pea, R. D. (1994). Seeing what we build together: Distributed multimedia learning environments for transformative communications. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 285299.
Porter, L., Guzdial, M., McDowell, C., & Simon, B. (2013). Success in introductory programming: What works? Communications of the ACM, 56(8), 3436.
Resnick, M., & Ocko, S. (1990). LEGO/LOGO – Learning through and about Design. Cambridge, MA: Epistemology and Learning Group, MIT Media Laboratory.
Robins, A. (2015). The ongoing challenges of computer science education research. Computer Science Education, 25(2), 115119.
Sannino, A., Daniels, H., & Gutiérrez, K. (Eds.) (2009). Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sawyer, R. K. (2014). The future of learning: Grounding educational innovation in the learning science. In Keith Sawyer, R. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, 2nd edn. (pp. 119). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Schmidt, H. G., Loyens, S. M., Van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2007). Problem-based learning is compatible with human cognitive architecture: Commentary on Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 9197.
Searle, K. A., & Kafai, Y. B. (2015). Boys’ needlework: Understanding gendered and indigenous perspectives on computing and crafting with electronic textiles. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 3139). New York: ACM.
Shapiro, R. B., Kelly, A., Ahrens, M., Johnson, B., Politi, H., & Fiebrink, R. (2017) Tangible distributed computer music for youth. The Computer Music Journal, 41(2), 5268.
Sommerhoff, D., Szameitat, A., Vogel, F., Chernikova, O., Loderer, K., & Fischer, F. (2018). What do we teach when we teach the learning sciences? A document analysis of 75 graduate programs. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27(2), 319351.
Stahl, G. (2005). Group cognition in computer-assisted collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 7990.
Sweller, J., Kirschner, P. A., & Clark, R. E. (2007). Why minimally guided teaching techniques do not work: A reply to commentaries. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 115121.
Tan, E., Kang, H. O’Neill, T., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2013). Desiring a career in STEM-related fields: How middle school girls articulate and negotiate between their narrated and embodied identities in considering a STEM trajectory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(10), 11431179.
Tobias, S., & Duffy, T. M. (Eds.) (2009). Constructivist Instruction: Success or Failure? Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Turkle, S., & Papert, S. (1990). Epistemological pluralism: Styles and voices within the computer culture. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 16(1), 128157.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6(1), 4978.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 6881.
Wigfield, A., Tonks, S., & Klauda, S. L. (2009). Expectancy-value theory. In Wentzel, K. & Miele, D. (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation at School (pp. 5575). New York: Routledge.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89100.
Yoon, S. A., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2017). What do learning scientists do? A survey of the ISLS membership. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(2), 167183.