Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T23:29:01.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

38 - An Evaluation of Computational Modeling in Cognitive Sciences

from Part V - General Discussion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2023

By
Margaret A. Boden
Edited by
Ron Sun
Ron Sun
Affiliation:
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, New York
Get access

Summary

Computer modeling of specific psychological processes began over fifty years ago. Cognitive scientists do not use computers merely as tools, but also as inspiration about the nature of mental processes. Computational cognitive science has a long way to go. There are many unanswered questions.However, cognitive scientists believe that the mind/brain is in principle intelligible in terms of whatever turns out to be the best theory of what computers can do. The overview of cognitive science given in this chapter should suffice to show that significant progress has been made.

Keywords

computerpsychologysimulationhistoryphilosophy
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Cognitive Sciences , pp. 1228 - 1249
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abelson, R. P. (1973). The structure of belief systems. In Schank, R. C. & Colby, K. M. (Eds.), Computer Models of Thought and Language (pp. 287–339). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.Google Scholar
Agre, P. E., & Chapman, D. (1987). Pengi: an implementation of a theory of activity. In Proceedings of AAAI-87, Seattle (pp. 268–272).Google Scholar
Agre, P. E., & Chapman, D. (1991). What are plans for? In Maes, P. (Ed.), Designing Autonomous Agents: Theory and Practice from Biology to Engineering and Back (pp. 17–34). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Aleksander, I. (2000). How to Build a Man: Dreams and Diaries. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. R. (1983). The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. R. (1996). ACT: a simple theory of complex cognition. American Psychologist, 5, 355–365.Google Scholar
Arbib, M. A., & Hesse, M. B. (1986). The Construction of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–609.Google Scholar
Blake, D. V., & Uttley, A. M. (Eds.). (1959). The Mechanization of Thought Processes (2 vols.) National Physical Laboratory Symposium No. 10. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Boden, M. A. (1972). Purposive Explanation in Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Boden, M. A. (1977/1987). Artificial Intelligence and Natural Man. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Boden, M. A. (2006). Mind as Machine: A History of Cognitive Science. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 11, 717–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadbent, D. E. (1952a). Listening to one of two synchronous messages. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 51–55.Google Scholar
Broadbent, D. E. (1952b). Failures of attention in selective listening. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 428–433.Google Scholar
Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and Communication. Oxford: Pergamon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, R. A. (1991a). Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 139–159.Google Scholar
Brooks, R. A. (1991b). Intelligence without reason. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Sydney.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1957). Going beyond the information given. In Gruber, H., Hammond, K. R., & Jessor, R. (Eds.), Contemporary Approaches to Cognition (pp. 41–69). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J., & Austin, G. (1956). A Study of Thinking. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Changeux, J.-P. (1985). Neuronal Man: The Biology of Mind. Trans. L. Garey. New York, NY: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Chomsky, A. N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. S-Gravenhage: Mouton.Google Scholar
Chrisley, R. L. (1999). Transparent computationalism. In Scheutz, M. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Workshop “New Trends in Cognitive Science 1999: Computationalism – The Next Generation”. Vienna: Conceptus-Studien.Google Scholar
Clark, A. J. (1997). Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A. J., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1993). The cognizer’s innards: a psychological and philosophical perspective on the development of thought. Mind and Language, 8, 487–519.Google Scholar
Clippinger, J. H. (1977). Meaning and Discourse: A Computer Model of Psychoanalytic Discourse and Cognition. London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, P. R., Morgan, J., & Pollack, M. E. (Eds.). (1990). Intentions in Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, P. R., & Perrault, C. R. (1979). Elements of a plan-based theory of speech acts. Cognitive Science, 3 (3), 177–212.Google Scholar
Colby, K. M. (1964). Experimental treatment of neurotic computer programs. Archives of General Psychiatry, 10, 220–227.Google Scholar
Colby, K. M. (1967). Computer simulation of change in personal belief systems. Behavioral Science, 12, 248–253.Google Scholar
Colby, K. M. (1975). Artificial Paranoia: A Computer Simulation of Paranoid Processes. New York, NY: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Copeland, B. J. (2002). Effective computation by humans and machines. Minds and Machines (Special Issue on Hypercomputing), 13, 281–300.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York, NY: Putnam.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1984). Elbow Room: The Varieties of Free Will Worth Wanting. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness Explained. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Dienes, Z., & Perner, J. (2007). The cold control theory of hypnosis. In Jamieson, G. (Ed.), Hypnosis and Conscious States: The Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Di Paolo, E. A. (1998). An investigation into the evolution of communication. Adaptive Behavior, 6, 285–324.Google Scholar
Di Paolo, E. A. (1999). On the evolutionary and behavioral dynamics of social coordination: models and theoretical aspects. D.Phil. Thesis, School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. L. (1965). Alchemy and artificial intelligence. Research Report P-3244, December 1965. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. L. (1972). What Computers Can’t Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1988). Connectionism and cognitive architecture: a critical analysis. Cognition, 28, 3–71.Google Scholar
Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14, 179–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elman, J. L. (1993). Learning and development in neural networks: the importance of starting small. Cognition, 48, 71–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elman, J. L., Bates, E. A., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Evans, D. (2001). Emotion: The Science of Sentiment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, D., & Cruse, P. (Eds.). (2004). Emotion, Evolution, and Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. R., & Turner, M. (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Feigenbaum, E. A., & Feldman, J. A. (Eds.). (1963). Computers and Thought. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind: An Essay in Faculty Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gazdar, G. J. M., Klein, E., Pullum, G., & Sag, I. A. (1985). Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. (2004). Fast and frugal heuristics: the tools of bounded rationality. In Koehler, D. J. & Harvey, N. (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (pp. 62–88). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103, 650–669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, D., & Mataric, M. J. (1999). Coordinating mobile robot group behavior using a model of interaction dynamics. In Proceedings of Third International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Agents-99), Seattle, WA (pp. 100–107). Washington, DC: ACM Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience, 13, 20–23.Google Scholar
Gregory, R. L. (1966). Eye and Brain: The Psychology of Seeing. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Gregory, R. L. (1967). Will seeing machines have illusions? In Collins, N. L. & Michie, D. M. (Eds.), Machine Intelligence 1 (pp. 169–180). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Grosz, B. (1977). The representation and use of focus in a system for understanding dialogs. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 67–76). Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Haugeland, J. (1985). Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haugeland, J. (1996). Body and world: a review of What Computers Still Can’t Do (Hubert L. Dreyfus). Artificial Intelligence, 80, 119–128.Google Scholar
Hebb, D. O. (1949). The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, D. R. (1979). Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, D. R. (1983/1985). “Waking up from the Boolean dream, or subcognition as computation” and “Post scriptum”. (The first item was originally published in Machlup, F. & Mansfield, U. (Eds.), The Study of Information: Interdisciplinary Messages. New York, NY: Wiley, 1983, pp. 263–285.)Google Scholar
Hogg, D. C. (1996). Machine vision. In Boden, M. A. (Ed.), Artificial Intelligence (pp. 183–228). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hollis, M. (1977). Models of Man: Philosophical Thoughts on Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchins, E. L. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. H. (Ed.). (1993). Brain Development and Cognition: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979). Micro- and macro-developmental changes in language acquisition and other representational systems. Cognitive Science, 3, 81–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1986). From meta-processes to conscious access: evidence from children’s metalinguistic and repair data. Cognition, 23, 95–147.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science. London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kirsh, D. (1991). Today the earwig, tomorrow man?. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 161–184.Google Scholar
Laird, J. E., Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. (1987). Soar: an architecture for general intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 33, 1–64.Google Scholar
McClelland, J. L., Rumelhart, D. E., & the PDP Research Group. (1986). Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Vol. 2, Psychological and Biological Models. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. (1994). Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, M. (1979). A theory of syntactic recognition for natural language. In Winston, P. H. & Brown, R. H. (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence: An MIT Perspective (Vol. 1, pp. 193–230). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marr, D. C. (1976). Early processing of visual information. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 275, 483–524.Google Scholar
Marr, D. C. (1977). Artificial intelligence: a personal view. Artificial Intelligence, 9, 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marr, D. C. (1982). Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.Google Scholar
Marr, D. C., & Hildreth, E. (1980). Theory of edge-detection. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 207, 187–217.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Meehl, P. E. (1954). Clinical versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis and a Review of the Evidence. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the Structure of Behavior. New York, NY: Holt.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1976). Language and Perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1993). Visual pathways to perception and action. In Hicks, T. P., Molotchnikoff, S., & Ono, T. (Eds.), Progress in Brain Research (Vol. 95, pp. 317–337). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Minsky, M. L. (1965). Matter, mind, and models. In Proceedings of the International Federation of Information Processing Congress (Vol. 1, pp. 45–49). Washington, DC: Spartan.Google Scholar
Minsky, M. L. (1985). The Society of Mind. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Minsky, M. L., & Papert, S. A. (1969). Perceptrons: An Introduction to Computational Geometry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Minsky, M. L., & Papert, S. A. (1988). “Prologue: a view from 1988” and “Epilogue: the new connectionism.” In Perceptrons: An Introduction to Computational Geometry (2nd ed., pp. viii–xv, 247–280). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H. A. (1957). Empirical explorations with the logic theory machine. In Proceedings of the Western Joint Computer Conference (Vol. 15, pp. 218–239).Google Scholar
Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Elements of a theory of human problem-solving. Psychological Review, 65, 151–166.Google Scholar
Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H. A. (1959). A general problem-solving program for a computer. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Processing, Paris (pp. 256–264).Google Scholar
Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1980). Attention to action: willed and automatic control of behavior. CHIP Report 99, University of California San Diego. (Officially published in Davidson, R., Schwartz, G., & Shapiro, D. (Eds.), Consciousness and Self-Regulation: Advances in Research and Theory (Vol. 4, pp. 1–18). New York, NY: Plenum, 1986.)Google Scholar
Philippides, A., Husbands, P., & O’Shea, M. (1998). Neural signalling – it’s a gas! In Niklasson, L., Boden, M., & Ziemke, T. (Eds.), ICANN98: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks (pp. 51–63). London: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Philippides, A., Ott, S. R., Husbands, P. N., Lovick, T. A., & O’Shea, M. (2005). Modeling cooperative volume signaling in a plexus of nitric oxide synthase-expressing neurons. Journal of Neuroscience, 25 (28), 6520–6532.Google Scholar
Picard, R. W. (1997). Affective Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1988). On language and connectionism: analysis of a parallel distributed model of language acquisition. Cognition, 28, 73–193.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1957). The Poverty of Historicism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Plunkett, K., & Marchman, V. (1993). From rote learning to system building: acquiring verb-morphology in children and connectionist nets. Cognition, 48, 21–69.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, F. (1958). The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychological Review, 65, 386–408.Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, P. S., Laird, J. E., & Newell, A. (Eds.). (1993). The SOAR Papers: Research on Integrated Intelligence (2 vols.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., & the PDP Research Group, (Eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition (pp. 216–271). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., & the PDP Research Group (1986). Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Vol. 1, Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sahota, M., & Mackworth, A. K. (1994). Can situated robots play soccer? In Proceedings of the Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Banff, Alberta (pp. 249–254).Google Scholar
Schank, R. C. (1973). Identification of conceptualizations underlying natural language. In Schank, R. C. & Colby, K. M. (Eds.), Computer Models of Thought and Language (pp. 187–247). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.Google Scholar
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Scheutz, M. (Ed.). (2002). Computationalism: New Directions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Selfridge, O. G. (1959). Pandemonium: a paradigm for learning. In Blake, D. V. & Uttley, A. M. (Eds.), The Mechanization of Thought Processes (vol. 1, pp. 511–529). London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1967). Motivational and emotional controls of cognition. Psychological Review, 74, 29–39.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1969). The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sloman, A. (1974). Physicalism and the bogey of determinism. In Brown, S. C. (Ed.), Philosophy of Psychology (pp. 283–304). London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloman, A. (1978). The Computer Revolution in Philosophy: Philosophy, Science, and Models of Mind. Brighton, UK: Harvester Press. Online at: www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/cogaff/crp/ [last accessed August 8, 2022].Google Scholar
Sloman, A. (1989). On designing a visual system: towards a Gibsonian computational model of vision. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical AI, 1, 289–337.Google Scholar
Sloman, A. (2000). Architectural requirements for human-like agents both natural and artificial. In Dautenhahn, K. (Ed.), Human Cognition and Social Agent Technology: Advances in Consciousness Research (pp. 163–195). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sloman, A. (2002). The irrelevance of Turing machines to artificial intelligence. In Scheutz, M., (Ed.), Computationalism: New Directions (pp. 87–127). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sloman, A. (2003). How many separately evolved emotional beasties live within us? In Trappl, R., Petta, P., & Payr, S. (Eds.), Emotions in Humans and Artifacts (pp. 29–96). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Smith, B. C. (1996). On the Origin of Objects. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sun, R. (2001). Hybrid systems and connectionist implementationalism. In Nadel, L. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science (Vol. 2, pp. 697–703). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sun, R. (2006). The CLARION cognitive architecture: extending cognitive modeling to social simulation. In Sun, R. (Ed.), Cognition and Multi-Agent Interaction: From Cognitive Modeling to Social Simulation (pp. 79–102). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sun, R., & Bookman, L. (Eds.). (1994). Computational Architectures Integrating Neural and Symbolic Processes. Needham, MA: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Sun, R., Peterson, T., & Merrill, E. (2001). From implicit skills to explicit knowledge: a bottom-up model of skill learning. Cognitive Science, 25 (2), 203–244.Google Scholar
Sun, R., & Qi, D. (2000). Rationality assumptions and optimality of co-learning. In Zhang, C. & Soo, V. (Eds.), Design and Application of Intelligent Agents (pp. 61–75). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Tomkins, S. S., & Messick, S. (Eds.). (1963). Computer Simulation of Personality: Frontier of Psychological Research. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Vera, A. H., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Situated action: a symbolic interpretation. Cognitive Science, 17, 7–48.Google Scholar
Wheeler, M. W. (2005). Reconstructing the Cognitive World: The Next Step. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Winograd, T. (1972). Understanding Natural Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, W. A. (1973). An experimental parsing system for transition network grammars. In Rustin, R. (Ed.), Natural Language Processing (pp. 111–154). New York, NY: Algorithmics Press.Google Scholar
Wright, I. P., & Sloman, A. (1997). MINDER1: an implementation of a proto-emotional agent architecture. Technical Report CSRP-97-1, School of Computer Science, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Wright, I. P., Sloman, A., & Beaudoin, L. P. (1996). Towards a design-based analysis of emotional episodes. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology, 3, 101–137.Google Scholar
Young, R. M. (1976). Seriation by Children: An Artificial Intelligence Analysis of a Piagetian Task. Basel: Birkhauser.Google Scholar
Zelazo, P. D., Moscovitch, M., & Thompson, E. (2007). The Cambridge Handbook of Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×