Abercrombie, David, 1967. Elements of General Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Abramson, Arthur, L-Thongkum, Theraphan and Nye, Patrick W., 2004. Voice register in Suai (Kuai): An analysis of perceptual and acoustic data. Phonetica 61: 147–171.Google Scholar

Abramson, Arthur and L-Thongkum, Theraphan, 2009. A fuzzy boundary between tone languages and voice-register languages. In Fant, Gunnar, Fujisaki, Hiroya and Shen, Jiaxuen (eds), Frontiers in Phonetics and Speech Science, pp. 149–155. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar

Abramson, Arthur, Nye, Patrick and L-Thongkum, Theraphan, 2007. Voice register in Khmu’: Experiments in production and perception. Phonetica 64: 80–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Adisasmito-Smith, Niken, 2004. Phonetic Influences of Javanese on Indonesian. PhD dissertation, Cornell University, New York.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., 2006. Reflections on language contact, areal diffusion, and mechanisms of linguistic change. In Caron, Bernard and Zima, Petr (eds), Sprachbund in the West African Sahel, pp. 23–36. Louvain-Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, Robert M. W., 2001. Introduction. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, Robert M. W. (eds), Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Problems in Comparative Linguistics, pp. 1–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Andruski, Jean E. and Ratliff, Martha, 2000. Phonation types in production of phonological tone: The case of Green Mong. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 30: 37–61.Google Scholar

Baxter, William H., 1992. A Handbook of Old Chinese Phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Benedict, Paul, 1996. Interphyla flow in Southeast Asia. In Pan-Asian Linguistics: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Language and Linguistics, pp. 1579–1590. Institute of Language and Culture for Rural Development, Mahidol University.Google Scholar

Bradley, David, 1982. Register in Burmese. In Bradley, David (ed.), Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics, no. 8: Tonation, pp. 117–132. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Bruhn, Daniel, 2007. The phonetic inventory of Iu-Mien. Manuscript, University of California, Berkeley. http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/~dwbruhn/dwbruhn_iu-mien.pdfGoogle Scholar

Brunelle, Marc, 2005. Register in Eastern Cham: Phonetic, Phonological and Sociolinguistic Approaches. PhD dissertation, Cornell University, New York.Google Scholar

Brunelle, Marc, 2006. A phonetic study of Eastern Cham register. In Sidwell, Paul and Grant, Anthony (eds), Chamic and Beyond, pp. 1–36. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Brunelle, Marc, 2009. Tone perception in Northern and Southern Vietnamese. Journal of Phonetics 37 (1): 79–96.Google Scholar

Brunelle, Marc, 2010. The role of larynx height in the Javanese tense ~ lax stop contrast. In Mercado, Raphael, Potsdam, Eric and de Mena Travis, Lisa (eds), Austronesian and Theoretical Linguistics, pp. 7–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brunelle, Marc, 2012. Dialect experience and perceptual integrality in phonological registers: Fundamental frequency, voice quality and the first formant in Cham. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 131 (4): 3088–3102.Google Scholar

Brunelle, Marc and Finkeldey, Joshua, 2011. Tone perception in Sgaw Karen. In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, pp. 372–375.Google Scholar

Brunelle, Marc and Kirby, James, 2015. Re-assessing tonal diversity and geographical convergence in Mainland Southeast Asia. In Comrie, Bernard and Enfield, Nick (eds), Languages of Mainland Southeast Asia: The State of the Art, pp. 82–110. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brunelle, Marc and Pittayaporn, Pittayawat, 2012. Phonologically-constrained change: The role of the foot in monosyllabization and rhythmic shifts in Mainland Southeast Asia. Diachronica 29 (4): 411–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chirkova, Ekaterina and Chen, Yiya, 2013. Lizu. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 43 (1): 75–86.Google Scholar

Clements, Nick, Michaud, Alexis and Patin, Cédric, 2011. Do we need tone features? In Hume, Elisabeth, Goldsmith, John and Leo Wetzels, W. (eds), Tones and Features, pp. 3–24. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Conver, Lynn C., 1999. A sketch of the phonology of a Lamet dialect. Mon-Khmer Studies, 29: 35–56.Google Scholar

Dahl, Östen, 2008. An exercise in a posteriori language sampling. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 61: 208–220.Google Scholar

DiCanio, Christian T., 2009. The phonetics of register in Takhian Thong Chong. Journal of the International. Phonetic Association 39 (2): 162–188.Google Scholar

DiCanio, Christian T., 2012. Coarticulation between tone and glottal consonants in Itunyoso Trique. Journal of Phonetics 40 (1): 162–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diffloth, Gérard, 1982. Registres, dévoisement, timbre vocalique: Leur histoire en katouique. Mon-Khmer Studies 11: 47–82Google Scholar

Diffloth, Gérard, 1989. Proto-Austroasiatic creaky voice. Mon-Khmer Studies 15: 139–154.Google Scholar

Diffloth, Gérard, 2005. The contribution of linguistic palaeontology and Austro-Asiatic. In Sagart, Laurent, Blench, Roger and Sanchez-Mazas, Alicia (eds), The Peopling of East Asia: Putting Together Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics, pp. 77–80. London: Routledge Curzon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ding, Picus S., 2001. The pitch-accent system of Niuwozi Prinmi. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 24 (2): 57–83.Google Scholar

Ding, Picus S., 2006. A typological study of tonal systems of Japan and Prinmi: Towards a definition of pitch-accent languages. Journal of Language Universals 7 (2): 1–35.Google Scholar

Donohue, Mark, 2012. The shape and spread of tone. In Donohue, Cathryn, Ishihara, Shunichi and Steed, William (eds), Quantitative Approaches to Problems in Linguistics: Studies in Honor of Phil Rose, pp. 9–20. Munich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar

Donohue, Mark and Whiting, Bronwen, 2011. Quantifying areality: A study of prenasalisation in Southeast Asia and New Guinea. Linguistic Typology 15 (1): 101–121.Google Scholar

Edmondson, Jerold A., 2010. The Kháng language of Vietnam in comparison to Ksingmul (Xinh-mun). In McElhanon, Kenneth A. and Reesink, Gerard P. (eds), A Mosaic of Languages and Cultures: Studies Celebrating the Career of Karl J. Franklin, pp. 138–154. Dallas, TX: SIL International.Google Scholar

Edmondson, Jerold A., Esling, John, Harris, Jimmy G., Shaoni, Li and Ziwo, Lama, 2001. The aryepiglottic folds and voice quality in the Yi and Bai languages: Laryngoscopic case studies. Mon-Khmer Studies 31: 83–100.Google Scholar

Egerod, Søren C., 1971. Phonation types in Chinese and South East Asian languages. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 13 (2): 159–172.Google Scholar

Enfield, Nicholas J., 2005. Areal linguistics and mainland Southeast Asia. Annual Review of Anthropology 34: 181–206.Google Scholar

Enfield, Nicholas J., 2011. Linguistic diversity in mainland Southeast Asia. In Enfield, Nicholas J. (ed.), Dynamics of Human Diversity, pp. 63–79. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Enfield, Nicholas J. and Diffloth, Gérard, 2009. Phonology and sketch grammar of Kri, a Vietic language of Laos. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 38 (1): 3–69.Google Scholar

Evans, Jonathan P., 2001a. Contact-induced tonogenesis in Southern Qiang. Language and Linguistics 2 (2): 63–110.Google Scholar

Evans, Jonathan P., 2001b. Introduction to Qiang Phonology and Lexicon: Synchrony and Diachrony. Tokyo: ILCAA, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar

Evans, Jonathan P., 2008. ‘African’ tone in the Sinosphere. Language and Linguistics 9 (3): 463–490.Google Scholar

Fagan, Joel L., 1988. Javanese intervocalic stop phonemes. Studies in Austronesian Linguistics 76: 173–202.Google Scholar

Ferlus, Michel, 1979. Formation des registres et mutations consonantiques dans les langues mon-khmer. Mon-Khmer Studies 8: 1–76.Google Scholar

Ferlus, Michel, 1996. Langues et peuples viet-muong. Mon-Khmer Studies 26: 7–28.Google Scholar

Ferlus, Michel, 1998. Les systèmes de tons dans les langues viet-muong. Diachronica 15 (1): 1–27.Google Scholar

Ferlus, Michel, 2004. The origin of tones in Viet-Muong. In Burusphat, Somsonge (ed.), Papers from the Eleventh Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistic Society, pp. 297–313. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University, Program for Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar

Ferlus, Michel, 2009. What were the four divisions of Middle Chinese? Diachronica 26 (2): 184–213.Google Scholar

Gage, William W., 1985. Glottal stops and Vietnamese tonogenesis. In Acson, Veneeta Z. and Leed, Richard L. (eds), Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications, no. 20: For Gordon H. Fairbanks, pp. 21–36. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar

Gandour, Jack, 1974. Consonant types and tone in Siamese. Journal of Phonetics 2: 337–350.Google Scholar

Gandour, Jack, 1983. Tone perception in Far Eastern languages. Journal of Phonetics 11: 149–175.Google Scholar

Gernet, Jacques, 1996. A History of Chinese Civilization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gregerson, Kenneth J., 1976. Tongue-root and register in Mon-Khmer. In Jenner, Philip N., Thompson, Laurence C. and Starosta, Stanley (eds), Austroasiatic Studies, pp. 323–370. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar

Gruber, James, 2011. An Articulatory, Acoustic, and Auditory Study of Burmese Tone. PhD thesis, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Gussenhoven, Carlos, 2000. On the origin and development of the Central Franconian tone contrast. In Lahiri, Aditi (ed.), Analogy, Leveling, and Markedness, pp. 215–260. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Haig, Geoffrey, 2001. Linguistic diffusion in present-day Anatolia: From top to bottom. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, Robert M. W. (eds), Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Problems in Comparative Linguistics, pp. 195–224. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hanson, H. M., 2009. Effects of obstruent consonants on fundamental frequency at vowel onset in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125 (1): 425–441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hartmann-So, Helga, 1989. Morphophonemic changes in Daai Chin. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 12 (2): 51–65.Google Scholar

Haudricourt, André-Georges, 1954. De l’origine des tons en viêtnamien. Journal Asiatique 242: 69–82.Google Scholar

Haudricourt, André-Georges, 1961. Bipartition et tripartition des systèmes de tons dans quelques langues d’Extrême-Orient. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 56 (1): 163–180.Google Scholar

Haudricourt, André-Georges, 1965. Les mutations consonantiques des occlusives initiales en mon-khmer. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 60 (1): 160–172.Google Scholar

Haudricourt, André-Georges, 1971. New Caledonia and the Loyalty Islands. In Sebeok, Thomas A. (ed.), Current Trends in Linguistics, vol. 8: Linguistics in Oceania, pp. 359–396. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Henderson, Eugénie J. A., 1952. The main features of Cambodian pronunciation. Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies 17: 140–174.Google Scholar

Henderson, Eugénie J. A., 1965. The topography of certain phonetic and morphological characteristics of South East Asian languages. Lingua 15: 400–434.Google Scholar

Henderson, Eugénie J. A., 1967. Grammar and tone in South-East Asian languages. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Karl-Marx Universität Leipzig 16 (1/2): 171–178.Google Scholar

Henderson, Eugénie J. A., 1979. Bwe Karen as a two-tone language? In Liem, Nguyen Dang (ed.), South-East Asian Linguistic Studies, vol. 3, pp. 301–326. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Hildebrandt, Kristine A., 2007. Tone in Tibeto-Burman languages: Typological and sociolinguistic approaches. In Miestamo, Matti and Wälchli, Bernhard (eds), New Trends in Typology: Young Typologists’ Contributions to Linguistic Theory, pp. 67–90. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Hombert, Jean-Marie, 1977. Development of tones from vowel height? Journal of Phonetics 5: 9–16.Google Scholar

Hombert, Jean-Marie, 1978. Consonant types, vowel quality, and tone. In Fromkin, Victoria A. (ed.), Tone: A Linguistic Survey, pp. 77–111. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Hombert, Jean-Marie, Ohala, John J. and Ewan, William G., 1979. Phonetic explanations for the development of tones. Language 55 (1): 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

House, Arthur S. and Fairbanks, Grant, 1953. The influence of consonant environment upon the secondary acoustical characteristics of vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 25: 105–113.Google Scholar

Huffman, Franklin E., 1976. The register problem in fifteen Mon-Khmer languages. In Jenner, Philip N., Thompson, Laurence C. and Starosta, Stanley (eds), Austroasiatic Studies, part I, pp. 575–589. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar

van der Hulst, Harry, 2011. Pitch-accent systems. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewan, Colin J., Hume, Elisabeth and Rice, Keren (eds), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, vol. 2, pp. 1003–1027. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry M., 1976. Phonologization. In Julliand, Alphonse G. (ed.), Linguistic Studies Offered to Joseph Greenberg on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday, vol. 2, pp. 407–418. Saratoga: Anma Libri.Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry M., 2006. Word prosodic typology. Phonology 23: 225–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hyman, Larry M., 2009. How (not) to do phonological typology: The case of pitch-accent. Language Sciences 31: 213–238.Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry M., 2010. Kuki-Thaadow: An African tone system in Southeast Asia. In Floricic, Franck (ed.), Essais de typologie et de linguistique générale, pp. 31–51. Lyon, France: Les Presses de l’Ecole Normale Supérieure.Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry M. and Haokip, Thien, 2004. Kuki-Thaadow Grammar (draft). http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/person/19Google Scholar

Hyslop, Gwendolyn, 2009. Kurtöp tone: A tonogenetic case study. Lingua 119: 827–845.Google Scholar

Jenner, Philip N., 1974. The development of registers in Standard Khmer. In Liem, Nguyen Dang (ed.), South-East Asian Linguistic Studies, vol. 1, pp. 47–60. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Jones, Robert B., 1986. Pitch register languages. In McCoy, John and Light, Timothy (eds), Contributions to Sino-Tibetan Studies, pp. 135–143. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kingston, John, 2005. The phonetics of Athabaskan tonogenesis. In Hargus, Sharon and Rice, Keren (eds), Athabaskan Prosody, pp. 137–184. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Kirby, James, 2010. Dialect experience in Vietnamese tone perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 127 (6): 3749–3757.Google Scholar

Kirby, James, 2013. The role of probabilistic enhancement in phonologization. In Yu, Alan C. L. (ed.), Origins of Sound Change: Approaches to Phonologization, pp. 228–246. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kirby, James, 2014. Incipient tonogenesis in Phnom Penh Khmer: Acoustic and perceptual studies. Journal of Phonetics 43: 69–85.Google Scholar

L-Thongkum, Theraphan, 1979. The distribution of the sounds of Bruu. Mon-Khmer Studies 8: 221–293.Google Scholar

L-Thongkum, Theraphan, 1988. Another look at the register distinction in Mon. In Bamroongraks, Cholticha, Khanittanan, Wilaiwan and Permch, Laddawan (eds), The International Symposium on Language and Linguistics, pp. 22–51. Bangkok: Thammasat University.Google Scholar

L-Thongkum, Theraphan and Chommanad, Intajamornrak, 2008. Tonal evolution induced by language contact: A case study of the T’in (Lua’) language of Nan province, northern Thailand. Mon-Khmer Studies 38: 57–68.Google Scholar

Htay, La Maung, 2011. A Sociolinguistic Survey of Three Lisu Dialects. MA thesis, Payap University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, Peter, 1971. Preliminaries to Linguistic Phonetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, Peter and Maddieson, Ian, 1996. The Sounds of the World’s Languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Laver, John, 1980. Phonetic Description of Voice Quality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lee, Ernest W., 1966. Proto-Chamic Phonological Word and Vocabulary. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar

Lee, Ernest W., 1998. The contribution of Cat Gia Roglai to Chamic. In Thomas, David (ed.), Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistic Studies, no. 15: Further Chamic Studies, pp. 31–54. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Leer, Jeff, 1999. Tonogenesis in Athabaskan. In Kaji, Shigeki (ed.), Cross-linguistic Studies of Tonal Phenomena, Tonogenesis, Typology, and Related Topics, pp. 37–66. Tokyo: Institute of the Study of the Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar

Lehiste, Ilse, 1970. Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Lewis, Paul W., 1973. Tone in the Akha language. Anthropological Linguistics 15: 183–188.Google Scholar

Lindell, Kristina, Svantesson, Jan-Olof and Tayanin, Damrong, 1978. Two dialects of the Romeet (Lamet) language. Cahiers de linguistique Asie Orientale 4: 5–22.Google Scholar

Lisker, Leigh, 1986. ‘Voicing’ in English: A catalogue of acoustic features signaling /b/ versus /p/ in trochees. Language and Speech 29: 3–11.Google Scholar

Luce, Gordon H., undated. Draft letter, incomplete, addressee not indicated (to Henderson?), concerning analysis of Riang tones and grammar. Luce Collection, MS 6574–7, 050a-b. National Library of Australia.Google Scholar

Maddieson, Ian, 1978. Universals of tone. In Greenberg, Joseph H., Ferguson, Charles A. and Moravcsik, Edith A. (eds), Universals of Human Language, vol. 2: Phonology, pp. 335–363. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Maddieson, Ian, 2011. Tone. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, chapter 13. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. http://wals.info/chapter/13Google Scholar

Maddieson, Ian and Pang, Keng-Fong, 1993. Tone in Utsat. In Edmondson, Jerold A. and Gregerson, Kenneth J. (eds), Tonality in Austronesian Languages, pp. 91–106. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar

Maspero, Henri, 1912. Etudes sur la phonétique historique de la langue annamite: Les initiales. Bulletin de l’École française d’Extrême-Orient 12: 1–124.Google Scholar

Matisoff, James, 1973. Tonogenesis in Southeast Asia. In Hyman, Larry (ed.), Consonant Types and Tone, pp. 71–95. Los Angeles: Linguistics Program, University of Southern California.Google Scholar

Matisoff, James, 2001. Genetic versus contact relationship: Prosodic diffusability in South-East Asian languages. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, Robert M. W. (eds), Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Problems in Comparative Linguistics, pp. 291–327. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mazaudon, Martine, 1973. Phonologie du Tamang. Langues et Civilisations à Tradition Orale, vol. 4. Paris: SELAF.Google Scholar

Mazaudon, Martine, 2012. Paths to tone in the Tamang branch of Tibeto-Burman (Nepal). In de Vogalaer, Gunther and Seiler, Guido (eds), The Dialect Laboratory: Dialects as a Testing Ground for Theories of Language Change, pp. 139–177. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Mazaudon, Martine and Michaud, Alexis, 2008. Tonal contrasts and initial consonants: A case study of Tamang, a ‘missing link’ in tonogenesis. Phonetica 65: 231–256.Google Scholar

Michaud, Alexis, 2004. Final consonants and glottalization: New perspectives from Hanoi Vietnamese. Phonetica 61 (2/3): 119–146.Google Scholar

Michaud, Alexis, 2006. Tonal reassociation and rising tonal contours in Naxi. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 29 (1): 61–94.Google Scholar

Michaud, Alexis, 2008. Phonemic and tonal analysis of Yongning Na. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 37 (2): 159–196.Google Scholar

Michaud, Alexis, 2013. Studying level-tone systems in Asia: The case of the Naish languages. Paper presented at the International Conference on Phonetics of the Languages in China (ICPLC-2013), City University of Hong Kong, 2–4 December 2013.Google Scholar

Michaud, Alexis and Xueguang, He, 2007. Reassociated tones and coalescent syllables in Naxi (Tibeto-Burman). Journal of the International Phonetic Association 37 (3): 237–255.Google Scholar

Morey, Stephen, 2005. The Tai Languages of Assam: A Grammar and Texts. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Mundhenk, Alice T. and Goschnick, Hella E., 1977. Haroi phonemes. In Thomas, David (ed.), Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics, no. 4: Chamic Studies, pp. 1–16. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Narumol, Charoenma, 1982. The phonologies of a Lampang Lamet and Wiang Papao Lua. Mon-Khmer Studies 11: 35–45.Google Scholar

Bay, Naw Say, 1995. The phonology of the Dung dialect of Moken. In Bradley, David (ed.), Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics, no. 13: Studies in Burmese Languages, pp. 193–205. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Văn Lợi, Nguyễn, 1993. Tiếng Rục. Hanoi: Nhà xuất bản Khoa học xã hội [Social Sciences Publishing House].Google Scholar

Văn Lợi, Nguyễn and Edmondson, Jerold, 1997. Tones and voice quality in modern northern Vietnamese: Instrumental case studies. Mon-Khmer Studies 28: 1–18.Google Scholar

Nicolson, Beth, 2000. The Nung An language of Vietnam: Stepchild or aberrant son? In The Fifth International Symposium on Languages and Linguistics, pp. 266–295. Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City University of Social Sciences and Humanities.Google Scholar

Ohala, John J., 1973. The physiology of tone. In Hyman, Larry M. (ed.), Consonant Types and Tone, pp. 1–14. Los Angeles: Linguistics Program, University of Southern California.Google Scholar

Pham, Andrea, 2003. Vietnamese Tone: A New Analysis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Phan, John D., 2013. Lacquered Words: The Evolution of Vietnamese under Sinitic Influences from the First Century BCE through the Seventeenth Century CE. PhD dissertation, Cornell University, New York.Google Scholar

Pike, Kenneth L., 1948. Tone Languages. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Premsrirat, Suwilai, 2001. Tonogenesis in Khmu dialects of SEA. Mon-Khmer Studies 31: 47–56.Google Scholar

Pulleyblank, Edwin G., 1962. The consonantal system of Old Chinese. Asia Major, Series 2 (9): 58–144, 206–265.Google Scholar

Pulleyblank, Edwin G., 1978. The nature of the Middle Chinese tones and their development to early Mandarin. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 6: 173–203.Google Scholar

Pulleyblank, Edwin G., 1986. Tonogenesis as an index of areal relationships in East Asia. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 19 (1): 65–82.Google Scholar

Ratliff, Martha, 1987. Tone sandhi compounding in White Hmong. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 10 (2): 71–105.Google Scholar

Ratliff, Martha, 1992a. Grammar and tone in Asian languages. In The Third International Symposium on Language and Linguistics, Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 1064–1078. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.Google Scholar

Ratliff, Martha, 1992b. Meaningful Tone: A Study of Tonal Morphology in Compounds, Form Classes and Expressive Phrases in White Hmong. Dekalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Ratliff, Martha, 2002. Timing tonogenesis: Evidence from borrowing. Berkeley Linguistics Society 28: 29–41.Google Scholar

Ratliff, Martha, 2015. Tonoexodus, tonogenesis, and tone change. In Honeybone, Patrick and Salmons, Joseph (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Historical Phonology, pp. 245–261. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rivierre, Jean-Claude, 1993. Tonogenesis in New Caledonia. In Edmondson, Jerold A. and Gregerson, Kenneth J. (eds), Tonality in Austronesian Languages, pp. 155–173. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar

Sidwell, Paul, 2013. Issues in Austroasiatic classification. Language and Linguistics Compass 7 (8): 437–457.Google Scholar

Sidwell, Paul and Blench, Roger, 2011. The Austroasiatic Urheimat: The Southeastern Riverine Hypothesis. In Enfield, Nicholas J. (ed.), Dynamics of Human Diversity, pp. 1–30. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Steriade, Donca, 2001/2008. The phonology of perceptibility effects: The P-map and its consequences for constraint organization. In Hanson, Kristin and Inkelas, Sharon (eds), The Nature of the Word: Studies in Honor of Paul Kiparsky, pp. 151–179. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Svantesson, Jan-Olof, 1983. Kammu Phonology and Morphology. Travaux de L’Institut de Linguistique de Lund, vol. 18. Malmö: CWK Gleerup.Google Scholar

Svantesson, Jan-Olof, 1988. U. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 11: 64–133.Google Scholar

Svantesson, Jan-Olof, 1989. Tonogenetic mechanisms in Northern Mon-Khmer. Phonetica 46: 60–79.Google Scholar

Svantesson, Jan-Olof, 1991. Hu: A language with unorthodox tonogenesis. In Davidson, Jeremy H. C. S. (ed.), Austroasiatic Languages: Essays in Honour of H. L. Shorto, pp. 67–79. London: SOAS.Google Scholar

Minh, Thạch Ngọc, 1999. Monosyllabization in Kiengiang Khmer. Mon-Khmer Studies 29: 81–95.Google Scholar

Thomason, Sarah G., 2001. Language Contact: An Introduction. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.Google Scholar

Thurgood, Ela, 2004. Phonation types in Javanese. Oceanic Linguistics 43 (2): 277–295.Google Scholar

Thurgood, Graham, 2002. Vietnamese tone: Revising the model and the analysis. Diachronica 19 (2): 333–363.Google Scholar

Uhlenbeck, Eugenius M., 1964. A Critical Survey of Studies on the Languages of Java and Madura. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Phương, Vũ Thang, 1981. The Acoustic and Perceptual Nature of Tone in Vietnamese. PhD dissertation, Australian National University.Google Scholar

Watkins, Justin, 2001. Burmese. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 31: 291–295.Google Scholar

Watkins, Justin, 2013. A first look at tone in Myebon Sumtu Chin. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 79–104.Google Scholar

Watson, Richard L., 1996. Why three phonologies for Pacoh? Mon-Khmer Studies 26: 197–205.Google Scholar

Wayland, Ratree and Jongman, Allard, 2001. Chanthaburi Khmer vowels: Phonetic and phonemic analyses. Mon-Khmer Studies 31: 65–82.Google Scholar

Wayland, Ratree and Jongman, Allard, 2002. Registrogenesis in Khmer: A phonetic account. Mon-Khmer Studies 32: 101–115.Google Scholar

Wayland, Ratree and Guion, Susan A., 2005. Sound changes following the loss of /r/ in Khmer: A new tonogenetic mechanism? Mon-Khmer Studies 35: 55–82.Google Scholar

Yip, Moira, 2002. Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar