Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T05:53:50.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part VI - Mergers in High Technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2017

Roger D. Blair
Affiliation:
University of Florida
D. Daniel Sokol
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Baker, Jonathan B. and Carl, Shapiro. 2008. Detecting and Reversing the Decline in Horizontal Merger Enforcement. Antitrust 22, 2936.Google Scholar
Baumol, William. 2002. The Free Market Innovation Machine: Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brannon, Leah and Bradish, Kathleen. 2010. The Revised Horizontal Merger Guidelines: Can the Courts Be Persuaded? The Antitrust Source, 10(1) 710.Google Scholar
Bresnahan, Timothy. 1999. New Modes of Competition: Implications for the Future Structure of the Computer Industry. In Eisenach, J. and Lenard, T. (eds.), Competition, Innovation and the Microsoft Monopoly: Antitrust in the Digital Marketplace. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Press, pp. 155208.Google Scholar
Creighton, Susan. 2010. 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines: The View from the Technology Industry. The Antitrust Source, 10(1) 1518.Google Scholar
Eisenach, Jeffrey. 2012. Broadband Competition in the Internet Ecosystem. American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Eisenach, Jeffrey and Gotts, Ilene. 2015a. In Search of a Competition Doctrine for Information Technology Markets: Recent Antitrust Developments in the Online Sector. In di Sant’Orsola, D. Cugia, Noormohamed, F., and Guimarães, R. (eds.), Communications and Competition Law. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer Legal 6990.Google Scholar
Eisenach, Jeffrey and Gotts, Ilene,. 2015b. Looking Ahead: The FTC’s Role in Information Technology Markets. George Washington Law Review, 83, 1876–901.Google Scholar
Elzinga, Kenneth and Mills, David. 2011. The Lerner Index of Monopoly Power: Origins and Uses. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, 101(3), 558–64.Google Scholar
Evans, David and Schmalensee, Richard. 2013. The Antitrust Analysis of Multi-Sided Platform Businesses. In Blair, R. and Sokol, D. (eds.), Oxford Handbook on International Antitrust Economics. Oxford University Press, p. 423.Google Scholar
Farrell, Joseph and Shapiro, Carl. 2010. Antitrust Evaluation of Horizontal Mergers: An Economic Alternative to Market Definition. Berkeley Electronic Press.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Douglas and Wright, Joshua. 2012. Dynamic Analysis and the Limits of Antitrust Institutions. Antitrust Law Journal, 78(1), 122.Google Scholar
Gotts, Ilene. 2015. Summary of Recent U.S. Enforcement Decisions in Communication/Entertainment Industry Transactions. In di Sant’Orsola, D. Cugia, Noormohamed, F., and Guimarães, R. (eds.), Communications and Competition Law. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer Legal, pp. 1326.Google Scholar
Gotts, Ilene and Rapp, Richard. 2004. Antitrust Treatment of Mergers Involving Future Goods. Antitrust, Fall, 100–5.Google Scholar
Harrington, Joseph Jr.. 2013. Evaluating Mergers for Coordinated Effects and the Role of “Parallel Accommodating Conduct.” Antitrust Law Journal, 78, 651–68.Google Scholar
Hesse, Renata. 2014. At the Intersection of Antitrust & High-Tech: Opportunities for Constructive Engagement. Remarks as Prepared for the Conference on Competition and IP Policy in High-Technology Industries.Google Scholar
Hovenkamp, Herbert. 2012. Antitrust and the Movement of Technology. George Mason Law Review, 19(5), 1119–45.Google Scholar
Katz, Michael and Shapiro, Carl. 1994. Systems Competition and Network Effects. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(2), 93115.Google Scholar
Kwoka, John and Moss, Diana. 2012. Behavioral Merger Remedies: Evaluation and Implications for Antitrust Enforcement. Antitrust Bulletin, 57(4), 9791011.Google Scholar
Merger Guidelines (Horizontal). 2010. US Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission.Google Scholar
Nevo, Ari. 2014. Mergers that Increase Bargaining Leverage, Remarks as Prepared for the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research and Cornerstone Research Conference on Antitrust in Highly Innovative Industries, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.Google Scholar
Ramirez, Edith. 2015. Keynote Remarks. The Hal White Antitrust Conference.Google Scholar
Rosch, J. Thomas and Tucker, Darren. 2011. Emerging Theories of Competitive Harm in Merger Enforcement. The Antitrust Source, 11(1) 17.Google Scholar
Rose, Nancy. 2015. Deputy AAG for Economic Analysis, Speaking on Bargaining Leverage and Competitive Effects. Audio Tape. Available at www.americanbar.org/tools/digitalassetabstract.html/content/dam/aba/multimedia/antitrust_law/20150625_at150625_mo.mp3 (membership required).Google Scholar
Salop, Steven and Culley, Daniel. 2016. Revising the US Vertical Merger Guidelines: Policy Issues and an Interim Guide for Practitioners. The Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 4(1), 141.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Carl. 2010. The 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines: From Hedgehog to Fox in Forty Years. Antitrust Law Journal, 77, 712–37.Google Scholar
Shelanski, Howard. 2013. Information, Innovation, and Competition Policy for the Internet. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 161, 1673–705.Google Scholar
Sher, Scott and Kellie, Kemp. 2014. A Comparative Analysis of the Use of Merger Remedies in Technology Industries. CPI Antitrust Chronicle, December.Google Scholar
Sokol, Daniel. 2014. The Broader Implications of Merger Remedies in High Technology Markets. CPI Antitrust Chronicle, 12(1) 17.Google Scholar
Wright, Julian. 2004. One-Sided Logic in Two-Sided Markets. Review of Network Economics, 3(1), 4464.Google Scholar

References

American Bar Association. 2014. Joint Comments of the American Bar Association Section of Antitrust Law, Section of Intellectual Property Law, and Section of International Law on the SAIC Draft Rules on the Prohibition of Abuses of Intellectual Property Rights for the Purposes of Eliminating or Restricting Competition. July 9, 2014. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/competition/consultations/2013_technology_transfer/aba_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Coco, Rita. 2008. Antitrust Liability for Refusal to License Intellectual Property: A Comparative Analysis and the International Setting. Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, 12, 347.Google Scholar
Cotter, Thomas F. 2014. Comparative Law and Economics of Standard-Essential Patents and FRAND Royalties. Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 22, 311–61.Google Scholar
Emch, Adrian and Liyang, Hou. 2014. Antitrust Regulation of IPRs: China’s First Proposal. Competition Policy International Asian Column, August 14, 2014.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2014. Commission accepts legally binding commitments by Samsung Electronics on standard essential patent injunctions. IP-14–490. April 29, 2014.Google Scholar
Hao, Qian. 2013. The Multiple Hands: Institutional Dynamics of China’s Competition Regime. In Emch, Adrian and, Stallibrass, David (eds.), China’s Anti-monopoly Law: The First Five Years, Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 1534.Google Scholar
Hou, Liyang. 2012. The Essential Facilities Doctrine – What Was Wrong in Microsoft?. IIC- International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 43, 251–71.Google Scholar
International Bar Association. 2014. Submission to the Administration for Industry and Commerce on the Proposed Rules on the Prohibition of Abuses of Intellectual Property Rights for the Purposes of Eliminating or Restricting Competition. July 10, 2014. Available at www.ibanet.org/Document/Default.aspx?DocumentUid=088F2ACA-A837-47A2-A8AB-E4492EC96400.Google Scholar
Jones, Alison. 2014. Standard-Essential Patents: FRAND Commitments, Injunctions and the Smartphone Wars. European Competition Journal, 10, 136.Google Scholar
NDRC. 2014. NDRC Suspends the Investigation into IDC for Price-Monopoly Conduct, May 22, 2014. Available at www.ndrc.gov.cn/gzdt/201405/t20140522_612466.html.Google Scholar
US-China Business Council. 2014. US-China Business Council Comments on Draft Regulations on the Prohibition of Conduct that Eliminates or Restricts Competition through Abuse of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), July 10. Available at www.uschina.org/advocacy/testimony-speeches/us-china-business-council-comments-draft-regulations-prohibition-conduct.Google Scholar
USIT. 2015. NDRC Drafts Anti-Monopoly Guidelines against IPR Abuse. Available at http://usito.org/news/ndrc-drafts-anti-monopoly-guidelines-against-ipr-abuse.Google Scholar
Wang, Xianlin. 2000. Discussion on the Establishment and Responsibilities of China’s Anti-monopoly Agencies. Zhongguo Xingzheng Guanli (China Public Administration), 8, 6064.Google Scholar
Wang, Xiaoye. 2007. Several Questions about Our Anti-Monopoly Agencies. Dong Luncong Dongyue Tribune 21, 3041.Google Scholar
Zhang, Bingsheng. 2005. The Establishment of Our Anti-Monopoly Authorities – Questioning the Current Institutional Design. Fa Xue (Science of Law), 2, 113–21.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×