Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:36:47.767Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Epidemiology of female breast cancer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

Michael J. Michell
Affiliation:
King's College Hospital, London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Since the early twentieth century a large evidence and knowledge base of risk factors for breast cancer has developed. The seminal study of breast cancer epidemiology was the Lane–Claypon report in 1926. This study was important not only in the etiology of breast cancer but also in the development of epidemiological methods, being arguably the first systematic case-control study.

Before reviewing the epidemiological research, some important terms are defined. The two most common study designs in epidemiological research are the cohort study and the case-control study. In the cohort study, a group of subjects free of disease are recruited, and their status with respect to potential risk factors is ascertained. The subjects are followed up for the disease in question, to ascertain which factors are predictive of future disease. For example, in a cohort of nurses in the United States, it was found that women with high consumption of red meat were more likely to develop breast cancer. In a case-control study, subjects with the disease in question (cases) are recruited, together with a group of comparable subjects who do not have the disease (controls). Risk factor status of cases and controls is ascertained retrospectively. A notable example is the international series of case-control studies carried out in the 1960s and 1970s by McMahon and colleagues, which among other findings firmly established the association of late age at first childbirth with increased risk of breast cancer.

Type
Chapter
Information
Breast Cancer , pp. 1 - 12
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lane-Claypon, JE. A Further Report on Cancer of the Breast, with Special Reference to its Antecedent Conditions. Reports on Public Health and Medical Subjects No. 32. London: Ministry of Health, 1926.Google Scholar
Cho, E, Chen, WY, Hunter, DJ, et al. Red meat intake and risk of breast cancer among premenopausal women. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166: 2253–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacMahon, B, Cole, P, Lin, TM. Age at first birth and breast cancer risk. Bull WHO 1970; 43: 209–21.Google ScholarPubMed
Lowe, CR, MacMahon, B. Breast cancer and reproductive history of women in South Wales. Lancet 1970; i: 153–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirra, P, Cole, P, MacMahon, B. Breast cancer in an area of high parity: São Paulo, Brazil. Cancer Res 1971; 31: 77–83.Google Scholar
Ravnihar, B, MacMahon, Lindtner J. Epidemiologic features of breast cancer in Slovenia 1965–1967. Eur J Cancer 1971; 7: 295–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Alcohol, tobacco and breast cancer–collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 58515 women with breast cancer and 95067 women without the disease. Br J Cancer 2002; 87: 1234–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy–collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 51 epidemiological studies of 52705 women with breast cancer and 108411 women without breast cancer. Lancet 1997; 350: 1047–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Breast cancer and hormonal contraceptives: further results. Contraception 1996; 54 (Suppl 3): S1–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumitrescu, RG, Cotarla, I. Understanding breast cancer risk–where do we stand in 2005? J Cell Mol Med 2005; 9: 208–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McPherson, K, Steel, CN, Dixon, JM. Breast cancer–epidemiology, risk factors and genetics. Br Med J 2000; 321: 624–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lilienfeld, AM. The relationship of cancer of the female breast to artificial menopause and martal status. Cancer 1956; 9: 927–34.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilienfeld, AM, Johnson, EA. The age distribution in female breast and genital cancers. Cancer 1955; 8: 875–82.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miki, Y, Swensen, J, Shattuck-Eidens, D, et al. A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility geneBRCA1. Science 1994; 266: 66–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wooster, R, Bignell, G, Lancaster, J, et al. Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2. Nature 1995; 378: 789–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, GF, Hughes, KS, Lynch, HT, et al. Proceedings of the international consensus conference on breast cancer risk, genetics and risk management, April 2007. Cancer 2008; 113: 2627–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vatten, LJ, Solvoll, K, Løken, EB. Frequency of meat and fish intake and risk of breast cancer in a prospective study of 14,500 Norwegian women. Int J Cancer 1990; 46: 12–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, HP, Gourley, L, Duffy, SW, et al. Dietary effects on breast cancer risk in Singapore. Lancet 1991; 337: 1197–1200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peeters, PH, Keinan-Boker, L, Schouw, YT, et al. Phytoestrogens and breast cancer risk. Review of the epidemiological evidence. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2003; 77: 171–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCormack, VA, dos Santos Silva, I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006; 15: 1159–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyd, N, Guo, H, Martin, LJ, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 227–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuzick, J, Powles, T, Veronesi, U, et al. Overview of the main outcomes in breast-cancer prevention trials. Lancet 2003; 361: 296–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuzick, J, Forbes, J, Edwards, R, et al. First results from the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study (IBIS-I): a randomised prevention trial. Lancet 2002; 360: 817–24.Google ScholarPubMed
Cuzick, J. IBIS II: a breast cancer prevention trial in postmenopausal women using the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2008; 8: 1377–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waard, F. Breast cancer incidence and nutritional status with particular reference to body weight and height. Cancer Res 1975; 35: 3351–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Harvie, M, Howell, A, Vierkant, RA, et al. Association of gain and loss of weight before and after menopause with risk of postmenopausal breast cancer in the Iowa women's health study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005; 14: 656–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedenreich, CM. Review of anthropometric factors and breast cancer risk. Eur J Cancer Prev 2001; 10: 15–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willett, WC. Diet and breast cancer. J Intern Med 2001; 249: 395–411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keinan-Boker, L, Schouw, YT, Grobbee, , et al. Dietary phytoestrogens and breast cancer risk. Am J Clin Nutr 2004; 79: 282–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamamoto, S, Sobue, T, Kobayashi, M, et al. Soy, isoflavones and breast cancer risk in Japan. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003; 92: 906–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwasaki, M, Inoue, M, Otani, T, et al. Plasma isoflavone level and subsequent risk of breast cancer among Japanese women: a nested case-control study from the Japan Public Health Center-based prospective study group. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 1677–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, AH, Yu, MC, Tseng, CC, et al. Epidemiology of soy exposures and breast cancer risk. Br J Cancer 2008; 98: 9–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lagerros, YT, Hsieh, SF, Hsieh, CC. Physical activity in adolescence and young adulthood and breast cancer risk: a quantitative review. Eur J Cancer Prev 2004; 13: 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedenreich, CM, Cust, AE. Physical activity and breast cancer risk: impact of timing, type and dose of activity and population subgroup effects. Br J Sports Med 2008; 42: 636–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monninkhof, EM, Elias, SG, Vlems, FA, et al. Physical activity and breast cancer: a systematic review. Epidemiology 2007; 18: 137–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pharoah, PDP, Day, NE, Duffy, SW, et al. Family history and the risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 1997; 71: 800–9.3.0.CO;2-B>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Familial breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58,209 women with breast cancer and 101,986 women without the disease. Lancet 2001; 358: 1389–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easton, DF, Pooley, KA, Dunning, AM, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies novel breast cancer susceptibility loci. Nature 2007; 447: 1087–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leach, MO, Boggis, CR, Dixon, AK, et al. Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet 2005; 365: 1769–78.Google Scholar
,FH01 management committee, steering committee and collaborators. The challenge of evaluating annual mammography screening for young women with a family history of breast cancer. J Med Screen 2006; 13: 177–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, JN. Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic pattern. Cancer 1976; 37: 2486–92.3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gram, IT, Funkhouser, E, Tabar, L. The Tabár classification of mammographic parenchymal patterns. Eur J Radiol 1997; 24: 131–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bassett, LW, Feig, SA, Jackson, VP, et al. American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADSTM). 3rd ed. Reston VA: American College of Radiology, 1998.Google Scholar
Haars, G, Noord, PA, Gils, CH, et al. Measurements of breast density: no ratio for a ratio. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005; 14: 2634–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyd, NF, Rommens, JM, Vogt, K, et al. Mammographic density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer. Lancet Oncol 2005; 6: 798–808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuzick, J, Warwick, J, Pinney, E, et al. Effect of tamoxifen on breast density in women at increased risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004; 96: 621–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjurstam, N, Björneld, L, Warwick, J, et al. The Gothenburg mammographic screening trial. Cancer 2003; 97: 2387–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, SW, Tabar, L, Smith, RA, et al. Risk of breast cancer and risks with breast cancer: the relationship of histologic type with epidemiology, disease progression and survival. Sem Breast Dis 1999; 2: 292–300.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×