Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Print publication year: 2010
  • Online publication date: November 2010

10 - Changes in cortical excitability and interhemispheric interactions after stroke

from Section II. - Spontaneous Stroke Recovery in Humans

Related content

Powered by UNSILO


1. RothwellJC, ThompsonPD, DayBL, et al. Motor cortex stimulation in intact man. 1. General characteristics of EMG responses in different muscles. Brain. 1987;110:1173–90.
2. DayBL, RothwellJC, ThompsonPD, et al. Delay in the execution of voluntary movement by electrical or magnetic brain stimulation in intact man. Evidence for the storage of motor programs in the brain. Brain. 1989;112:649–63.
3. Di Lazzaro, V, OlivieroA, PilatoF, et al. Corticospinal volleys evoked by transcranial stimulation of the brain in conscious humans. Neurol Res. 2003;25:143–50.
4. TalelliP, GreenwoodRJ, RothwellJC. Arm function after stroke: Neurophysiological correlates and recovery mechanisms assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117:1641–59.
5. ZiemannU, LonneckerS, SteinhoffBJ, et al. Effects of antiepileptic drugs on motor cortex excitability in humans: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Ann Neurol. 1996;40:367–78.
6. DevanneH, LavoieBA, CapadayC. Input–output properties and gain changes in the human corticospinal pathway. Exp Brain Res. 1997;114:329–38.
7. FurlanM, MarchalG, ViaderF, et al. Spontaneous neurological recovery after stroke and the fate of the ischemic penumbra. Ann Neurol. 1996;40:216–26.
8. CatanoA, HouaM, CaroyerJM, et al. Magnetic transcranial stimulation in non-haemorrhagic sylvian strokes: Interest of facilitation for early functional prognosis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995;97:349–54.
9. CicinelliP, TraversaR, RossiniPM. Post-stroke reorganization of brain motor output to the hand: A 2–4 month follow-up with focal magnetic transcranial stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997;105:438–50.
10. CicinelliP, PasqualettiP, ZaccagniniM, et al. Interhemispheric asymmetries of motor cortex excitability in the postacute stroke stage: A paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Stroke. 2003;34:2653–8.
11. Cruz-MartinezA, TejadaJ, DiezTE. Motor hand recovery after stroke. Prognostic yield of early transcranial magnetic stimulation. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1999;39:405–10.
12. TraversaR, CicinelliP, PasqualettiP, et al. Follow-up of interhemispheric differences of motor evoked potentials from the ‘affected’ and ‘unaffected’ hemispheres in human stroke. Brain Res. 1998;803:1–8.
13. ManganottiP, PatuzzoS, CorteseF, et al. Motor disinhibition in affected and unaffected hemisphere in the early period of recovery after stroke. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;113:936–43.
14. TraversaR, CicinelliP, OliveriM, et al. Neurophysiological follow-up of motor cortical output in stroke patients. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000;111:1695–703.
15. BerardelliA, InghilleriM, ManfrediM, et al. Cortical and cervical stimulation after hemispheric infarction. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987;50:861–5.
16. PennisiG, RapisardaG, BellaR, et al. Absence of response to early transcranial magnetic stimulation in ischemic stroke patients: Prognostic value for hand motor recovery. Stroke. 1999;30:2666–70.
17. TrompettoC, AssiniA, BuccolieriA, et al. Motor recovery following stroke: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000;111:1860–7.
18. AlagonaG, DelvauxV, GerardP, et al. Ipsilateral motor responses to focal transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects and acute-stroke patients. Stroke. 2001;32:1304–09.
19. NardoneR, TezzonF. Inhibitory and excitatory circuits of cerebral cortex after ischaemic stroke: Prognostic value of the transcranial magnetic stimulation. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;42:131–6.
20. DelvauxV, AlagonaG, GerardP, et al. Post-stroke reorganization of hand motor area: A 1-year prospective follow-up with focal transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114:1217–25.
21. SwayneOB, RothwellJC, WardNS, et al. Stages of motor output reorganization after hemispheric stroke suggested by longitudinal studies of cortical physiology. Cereb Cortex. 2008;18:1909–22.
22. CatanoA, HouaM, CaroyerJM, et al. Magnetic transcranial stimulation in acute stroke: Early excitation threshold and functional prognosis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996;101:233–9.
23. ByrnesML, ThickbroomGW, PhillipsBA, et al. Long-term changes in motor cortical organisation after recovery from subcortical stroke. Brain Res. 2001;889:278–87.
24. PennisiG, AlagonaG, RapisardaG, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation after pure motor stroke. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;113:1536–43.
25. ThickbroomGW, ByrnesML, ArcherSA, et al. Motor outcome after subcortical stroke: MEPs correlate with hand strength but not dexterity. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;113:2025–9.
26. BastingsEP, GreenbergJP, GoodDC. Hand motor recovery after stroke: A transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping study of motor output areas and their relation to functional status. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002;16:275–82.
27. LiepertJ, BauderH, WolfgangHR, et al. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke. 2000;31:1210–6.
28. ThickbroomGW, ByrnesML, ArcherSA, et al. Motor outcome after subcortical stroke correlates with the degree of cortical reorganization. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115:2144–50.
29. LiepertJ, ClassenJ, CohenLG, et al. Task-dependent changes of intracortical inhibition. Exp Brain Res. 1998;118:421–6.
30. LiepertJ, StorchP, FritschA, et al. Motor cortex disinhibition in acute stroke. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000;111:671–6.
31. ShimizuT, HosakiA, HinoT, et al. Motor cortical disinhibition in the unaffected hemisphere after unilateral cortical stroke. Brain, 2002;125:1896–907.
32. LiepertJ, HaevernickK, WeillerC, et al. The surround inhibition determines therapy-induced cortical reorganization. Neuroimage. 2006;32:1216–20.
33. TurtonA, WroeS, TrepteN, et al. Contralateral and ipsilateral EMG responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation during recovery of arm and hand function after stroke. Electroenceph Clin Neurophys. 1996;101:316–28.
34. NetzJ, LammersT, HombergV. Reorganization of motor output in the non-affected hemisphere after stroke. Brain. 1997;120:1579–86.
35. ButefischCM, NetzJ, WesslingM, et al. Remote changes in cortical excitability after stroke. Brain. 2003;126:470–81.
36. WardNS, NewtonJM, SwayneOB, et al. Motor system activation after subcortical stroke depends on corticospinal system integrity. Brain. 2006;129:809–19.
37. MuraseN, DuqueJ, MazzocchioR, et al. Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke. Ann Neurol. 2004;55:400–09.
38. ButefischCM, WesslingM, NetzJ, et al. Relationship between interhemispheric inhibition and motor cortex excitability in subacute stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:4–21.
39. BoroojerdiB, DiefenbachK, FerbertA. Transcallosal inhibition in cortical and subcortical cerebral vascular lesions. J Neurol Sci. 1996;144:160–70.
40. FloelA, HummelF, DuqueJ, et al. Influence of somatosensory input on interhemispheric interactions in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:477–85.
41. LotzeM, MarkertJ, SausengP, et al. The role of multiple contralesional motor areas for complex hand movements after internal capsular lesion. J Neurosci. 2006;26:6096–102.
42. ReisJ, SwayneOB, VandermeerenY, et al. Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the understanding of cortical mechanisms involved in motor control. J Physiol. 2008;586:325–51.
43. WardNS, BrownMM, ThompsonAJ, et al. Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke: A longitudinal fMRI study. Brain. 2003;126:2476–96.
44. WardNS, NewtonJM, SwayneOB, et al. The relationship between brain activity and peak grip force is modulated by corticospinal system integrity after subcortical stroke. Eur J Neurosci. 2007;25:1865–73.
45. Johansen-BergH, RushworthMF, BogdanovicMD, et al. The role of ipsilateral premotor cortex in hand movement after stroke. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:14 518–23.
46. TalelliP, RothwellJ. Does brain stimulation after stroke have a future? Curr Opin Neurol. 2006;19:543–50.
47. CelnikP, HummelF, Harris-LoveM, et al. Somatosensory stimulation enhances the effects of training functional hand tasks in patients with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:1369–76.
48. FloelA, NagorsenU, WerhahnKJ, et al. Influence of somatosensory input on motor function in patients with chronic stroke. Ann Neurol. 2004;56:206–12.
49. FregniF, BoggioPS, ValleAC, et al. A sham-controlled trial of a 5-day course of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Stroke. 2006;37:2115–22.
50. TalelliP, GreenwoodRJ, RothwellJC. Exploring theta burst stimulation as an intervention to improve motor recovery in chronic stroke. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;118:333–42.
51. StinearCM, BarberPA, CoxonJP, et al. Priming the motor system enhances the effects of upper limb therapy in chronic stroke. Brain. 2008;131:1381–90.
52. StinearCM, BarberPA, SmalePR, et al. Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity. Brain. 2007;130:170–80.
53. StokesMG, ChambersCD, GouldIC, et al. Simple metric for scaling motor threshold based on scalp-cortex distance: Application to studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurophysiol. 2005;94:4520–7.
54. DayBL, ThompsonPD, DickJP, et al. Different sites of action of electrical and magnetic stimulation of the human brain. Neurosci Lett. 1987;75:101–06.
55. DayBL, DresslerD, Maertens de NoordhoutA, et al. Electric and magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex: Surface EMG and single motor unit responses. J Physiol. 1989;412:449–73.
56. ClassenJ, KnorrU, WerhahnKJ, et al. Multimodal output mapping of human central motor representation on different spatial scales. J Physiol. 1998;512:163–79.
57. KringsT, BuchbinderBR, ButlerWE, et al. Stereotactic transcranial magnetic stimulation: Correlation with direct electrical cortical stimulation. Neurosurgery. 1997;4:1319–25.