Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T22:51:47.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

27 - Relative contribution of advanced age and reduced follicle pool size on reproductive success

The quantity–quality enigma

from Section 5 - Pathology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2013

By
Frank Broekmans  and
Madeleine Dólleman
Edited by
Alan Trounson ,
Roger Gosden  and
Ursula Eichenlaub-Ritter
Frank Broekmans
Affiliation:
Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynecology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
Madeleine Dólleman
Affiliation:
Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynecology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
Alan Trounson
Affiliation:
California Institute for Regenerative Medicine
Roger Gosden
Affiliation:
Center for Reproductive Medicine and Infertility, Cornell University, New York
Ursula Eichenlaub-Ritter
Affiliation:
Universität Bielefeld, Germany
Get access

Summary

Introduction to reproductive aging

It is a well-known phenomenon that as a woman becomes older, her chances of reproductive success decrease. This is largely attributed to ovarian aging, the age-related decline in the quantity and quality of oocytes in the ovaries. At birth every woman has a certain endowment of oocytes. This number of oocytes decreases at various rates during life until the ovarian reserve is exhausted and menopause is reached [1]. Renewal of the oocyte pool from pluripotent stem cells has so far been denied, but recent studies have elicited possible new insights into this field [2]. The gradual decline in oocyte quantity with age is accompanied by a decrease in oocyte quality. This is substantiated by decreased pregnancy rates, increased miscarriage rates, and an increase in the rate of aneu-ploidy leading to offspring with trisomic karyotypes [3, 4]. Also, a growing incidence of unexplained infertility is apparent in women trying to achieve a pregnancy at a more advanced age [5]. The age related decrease in female fertility has direct repercussions in Western societies, as the trend to delayed childbearing continues.

The introduction of effective contraceptive methods in the 1960s and the growing participation of women in the labor force has resulted in a major change in reproductive behavior [6]. The average age at the birth of the first child has increased from approximately 24 years of age in 1970 to the age of 30 or over in recent years [7, 8]. In addition, the completed fertility rate (number of children born per woman) has decreased considerably and a growing proportion of women seek the help of assisted reproductive technology (ART) to conceive. As modern infertility treatments can only help around 50% of these women, a considerable proportion of women will remain childless involuntarily, with increased levels of personal distress and grave effects on relationship stability [9, 10]. The continuing trend to delay childbearing does not only have a large impact on population demographics; the annual costs for society from infertility treatments and ART-related complications, such as multiple pregnancies, are also high [11, 12].

Type
Chapter
Information
Biology and Pathology of the Oocyte
Role in Fertility, Medicine and Nuclear Reprograming
 , pp. 318 - 329
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Faddy, MJ, Gosden, RG. A model conforming the decline in follicle numbers to the age of menopause in women. Hum Reprod 1996; 11(7): 1484–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, YA, Woods, DC, Takai, Y, et al. Oocyte formation by mitotically active germ cells purified from ovaries of reproductive-age women. Nat Med 2012; 18(3): 413–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nybo Andersen, AM, Wohlfahrt, J, Christens, P, Olsen, J, Melbye, M. Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage study. BMJ 2000; 320(7251): 1708–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicolaidis, P, Petersen, MB. Origin and mechanisms of non-disjunction in human autosomal trisomies. Hum Reprod 1998; 13(2): 313–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Noord-Zaadstra, BM, Looman, CW, Alsbach, H, et al. Delaying childbearing: effect of age on fecundity and outcome of pregnancy. BMJ 1991; 302(6789): 1361–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leridon, H. Demographic effects of the introduction of steroid contraception in developed countries. Hum Reprod Update 2006; 12(5): 603–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
te Velde, ER, Pearson, PL. The variability of female reproductive ageing. Hum Reprod Update 2002; 8(2): 141–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
OECD. OECD Family Database. 2011.
Leridon, H. Can assisted reproduction technology compensate for the natural decline in fertility with age? A model assessment. Hum Reprod 2004; 19(7): 1548–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Habbema, JD, Eijkemans, MJ, Nargund, G, et al. The effect of in vitro fertilization on birth rates in western countries. Hum Reprod 2009; 24(6): 1414–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fauser, BC, Devroey, P, Macklon, NS. Multiple birth resulting from ovarian stimulation for subfertility treatment. Lancet 2005; 365(9473): 1807–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lutz, W, O’Neill, BC, Scherbov, S. Demographics. Europe's population at a turning point. Science 2003; 299(5615): 1991–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, E. A quantitative morphological investigation of the follicular system in newborn female infants. Acta Anat (Basel) 1953; 17(3): 201–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Block, E. Quantitative morphological investigations of the follicular system in women; variations at different ages. Acta Anat (Basel) 1952; 14(1–2): 108–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, TG. A quantitative and cytological study of germ cells in human ovaries. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1963; 158: 417–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markström, E, Svensson, ECh, Shao, R, Svanberg, B, Billig, H. Survival factors regulating ovarian apoptosis – dependence on follicle differentiation. Reproduction 2002; 123(1): 23–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santoro, N, Randolph, JFReproductive hormones and the menopause transition. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2011; 38(3): 455–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, SJ, Senikas, V, Nelson, JF. Follicular depletion during the menopausal transition: evidence for accelerated loss and ultimate exhaustion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1987; 65(6): 1231–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leidy, LE, Godfrey, LR, Sutherland, MR. Is follicular atresia biphasic? Fertil Steril 1998; 70(5): 851–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansen, KR, Knowlton, NS, Thyer, AC, et al. A new model of reproductive aging: the decline in ovarian non-growing follicle number from birth to menopause. Hum Reprod 2008; 23(3): 699–708.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faddy, MJ, Gosden, RG, Gougeon, A, Richardson, SJ, Nelson, JF. Accelerated disappearance of ovarian follicles in mid-life: implications for forecasting menopause. Hum Reprod 1992; 7(10): 1342–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lisabeth, L, Harlow, S, Qaqish, B. A new statistical approach demonstrated menstrual patterns during the menopausal transition did not vary by age at menopause. J Clin Epidemiol 2004; 57(5): 484–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gianaroli, L, Magli, MC, Ferraretti, AP, Munné, S. Preimplantation diagnosis for aneuploidies in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization with a poor prognosis: identification of the categories for which it should be proposed. Fertil Steril 1999; 72(5): 837–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, D, Delhanty, JD. Comprehensive chromosomal analysis of human preimplantation embryos using whole genome amplification and single cell comparative genomic hybridization. Mol Hum Reprod 2000; 6(11): 1055–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Handyside, AH, Montag, M, Magli, MC, et al. Multiple meiotic errors caused by predivision of chromatids in women of advanced maternal age undergoing in vitro fertilisation. Eur J Hum Genet 2012; 20(7): 742–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warburton, D. The effect of maternal age on the frequency of trisomy: change in meiosis or in utero selection? Prog Clin Biol Res 1989; 311: 165–81.Google ScholarPubMed
Lamb, NE, Yu, K, Shaffer, J, Feingold, E, Sherman, SL. Association between maternal age and meiotic recombination for trisomy 21. Am J Hum Genet 2005; 76(1): 91–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tarin, JJ. Aetiology of age-associated aneuploidy: a mechanism based on the ‘free radical theory of ageing’. Hum Reprod 1995; 10(6): 1563–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilding, M, De Placido, G, De Matteo, L, et al. Chaotic mosaicism in human preimplantation embryos is correlated with a low mitochondrial membrane potential. Fertil Steril 2003; 79(2): 340–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, D, Mayaux, MJ. Female fecundity as a function of age: results of artificial insemination in 2193 nulliparous women with azoospermic husbands. Federation CECOS. N Engl J Med 1982; 306(7): 404–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Bouchard, G. Population studies and genetic epidemiology in northeast Quebec. Can Stud Popul 1989; 16(1): 61–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Boer, EJ, den Tonkelaar, I, te Velde, ER, et al. A low number of retrieved oocytes at in vitro fertilization treatment is predictive of early menopause. Fertil Steril 2002; 77(5): 978–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broekmans, FJ, Knauffe, EA, te Velde, ER, Macklon, NS, Fauser, BC. Female reproductive ageing: current knowledge and future trends. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2007; 18(2): 58–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
te Velde, ER, Eijkemans, R, Habbema, HD. Variation in couple fecundity and time to pregnancy, an essential concept in human reproduction. Lancet 2000; 355(9219): 1928–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Connor, KA, Holman, DJ, Wood, JW. Declining fecundity and ovarian ageing in natural fertility populations. Maturitas 1998; 30(2): 127–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sauer, MV, Kavic, SM. Oocyte and embryo donation 2006: reviewing two decades of innovation and controversy. Reprod Biomed Online 2006; 12(2): 153–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Treloar, AE, Boynton, RE, Behn, BG, Brown, BW. Variation of the human menstrual cycle through reproductive life. Int J Fertil 1967; 12(1 Pt 2): 77–126.Google ScholarPubMed
Broekmans, FJ, Soules, MR, Fauser, BC. Ovarian aging: mechanisms and clinical consequences. Endocr Rev 2009; 30(5): 465–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
den Tonkelaar, I, te Velde, ER, Looman, CW. Menstrual cycle length preceding menopause in relation to age at menopause. Maturitas 1998; 29(2): 115–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brook, JD, Gosden, RG, Chandley, AC. Maternal ageing and aneuploid embryos – evidence from the mouse that biological and not chronological age is the important influence. Hum Genet 1984; 66(1): 41–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichenlaub-Ritter, U, Chandley, AC, Gosden, RG. The CBA mouse as a model for age-related aneuploidy in man: studies of oocyte maturation, spindle formation and chromosome alignment during meiosis. Chromosoma 1988; 96(3): 220–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, SB, Yang, Q, Allran, K, Taft, LF, Sherman, SL. Women with a reduced ovarian complement may have an increased risk for a child with Down syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 2000; 66(5): 1680–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haadsma, ML, Mooij, TM, Groen, H, et al. A reduced size of the ovarian follicle pool is associated with an increased risk of a trisomic pregnancy in IVF-treated women. Hum Reprod 2010; 25(2): 552–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nasseri, A, Mukherjee, T, Grifo, JA, et al. Elevated day 3 serum follicle stimulating hormone and/or estradiol may predict fetal aneuploidy. Fertil Steril 1999; 71(4): 715–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Montfrans, JM, Dorland, M, Oosterhuis, GJ, et al. Increased concentrations of follicle-stimulating hormone in mothers of children with Down's syndrome. Lancet 1999; 353(9167): 1853–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van der Stroom, EM, König, T, van Dulmen-den Broeder, E, et al. Early menopause in mothers of children with Down syndrome? Fertil Steril 2011; 96(4): 985–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kline, JK, Kinney, AM, Levin, B, et al. Trisomic pregnancy and elevated FSH: implications for the oocyte pool hypothesis. Hum Reprod 2011; 26(6): 1537–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thum, MY, Kalu, E, Abdalla, H. Elevated basal FSH and embryo quality: lessons from extended culture embryos: raised FSH and blastocyst quality. J Assist Reprod Genet 2009; 26(6): 313–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biljan, MM, Buckett, WM, Dean, N, Phillips, SJ, Tan, SL. The outcome of IVF-embryo transfer treatment in patients who develop three follicles or less. Hum Reprod 2000; 15(10): 2140–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanoch, J, Law, J, Holzer, H, et al. Young low responders protected from untoward effects of reduced ovarian response [see comments]. Fertil Steril 1998; 69(6): 1001–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oudendijk, JF, Yarde, F, Eikjemans, MJ, Broekmans, FJ, Broer, SL. The poor responder in IVF: is the prognosis always poor?: A systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2012; 18(1): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sunkara, SK, Rittenberg, V, Raine-Fenning, N, et al. Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles. Hum Reprod 2011; 26(7): 1768–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weghofer, A, Dietrich, W, Barad, DH, Gleicher, N. Live birth chances in women with extremely low-serum anti-Mullerian hormone levels. Hum Reprod 2011; 26(7): 1905–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haadsma, ML, Groen, H, Mooij, TM, et al. Miscarriage risk for IVF pregnancies in poor responders to ovarian hyperstimulation. Reprod Biomed Online 2010; 20(2): 191–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voorhuis, M, Onland-Moret, NC, van der Schouw, YT, Fauser, BC, Broekmans FJ. Human studies on genetics of the age at natural menopause: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2010; 16(4): 364–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, DH, Jones, ME, Schoemaker, MJ, Ashworth, A, Swerdlow, AJ. Familial concordance for age at natural menopause: results from the Breakthrough Generations Study. Menopause 2011; 18(9): 956–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torgerson, DJ, Thomas, RE, Reid, DM. Mothers and daughters menopausal ages: is there a link? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1997; 74(1): 63–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snieder, H, MacGregor, AJ, Spector, TD. Genes control the cessation of a woman's reproductive life: a twin study of hysterectomy and age at menopause. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998; 83(6): 1875–80.Google ScholarPubMed
de Bruin, JP, Bovenhuis, H, van Noord, PA, et al. The role of genetic factors in age at natural menopause. Hum Reprod 2001; 16(9): 2014–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murabito, JM, Yang, Q, Fox, C, Wilson, PW, Cupples, LA. Heritability of age at natural menopause in the Framingham Heart Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005; 90(6): 3427–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Asselt, KM, Kok, HS, Pearson, PL, et al. Heritability of menopausal age in mothers and daughters. Fertil Steril 2004; 82(5): 1348–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stolk, L, Perry, JR, Chasman, DI, et al. Meta-analyses identify 13 loci associated with age at menopause and highlight DNA repair and immune pathways. Nat Genet 2012; 44(3): 260–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kok, HS, van Asselt, KM, van der Schouw, YT, et al. Heart disease risk determines menopausal age rather than the reverse. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47(10): 1976–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koochmeshgi, J, Hosseini-Mazinani, SM, Morteza Seifati, S, Hosein-Pur-Nobari, N, Teimoori-Toolabi, L. Apolipoprotein E genotype and age at menopause. 2004; Ann NY Acad Sci 1019: 564–7.CrossRef
Bonomini, F, Filippini, F, Hayek, T, et al. Apolipoprotein E and its role in aging and survival. Exp Gerontol 2010; 45(2): 149–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Disseldorp, J, Broekmans, FJ, Peeters, PH, Fauser, BC, van der Schouw, YT. The association between vascular function-related genes and age at natural menopause. Menopause 2008; 15(3): 511–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Asselt, KM, Kok, HS, Peeters, PH, et al. Factor V Leiden mutation accelerates the onset of natural menopause. Menopause 2003; 10(5): 477–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Midgette, AS, Baron, JA. Cigarette smoking and the risk of natural menopause. Epidemiology 1990; 1(6): 474–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, Q, Sherman, SL, Hassold, TJ, et al. Risk factors for trisomy 21: maternal cigarette smoking and oral contraceptive use in a population-based case-control study. Genet Med 1999; 1(3): 80–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matzuk, MM. Eggs in the balance. Nat Genet 2001; 28(4): 300–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broer, SL, Mol, B, Dólleman, M, Fauser, BC, Broekmans, FJ. The role of anti-Mullerian hormone assessment in assisted reproductive technology outcome. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2010; 22(3): 193–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gougeon, A, Ecochard, R, Thalabard, JC. Age-related changes of the population of human ovarian follicles: increase in the disappearance rate of non-growing and early-growing follicles in aging women. Biol Reprod 1994; 50(3): 653–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broekmans, FJ, Kwee, J, Hendriks, DJ, Mol, BW, Lambalk, CB. A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. Hum Reprod Update 2006; 12(6): 685–718.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broer, SL, Eijkemans, MJ, Scheffer, GJ, et al. Anti-mullerian hormone predicts menopause: a long-term follow-up study in normoovulatory women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96(8): 2532–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tehrani, FR, Shakeri, N, Solaymani-Dodaran, M, Azizi, F. Predicting age at menopause from serum antimullerian hormone concentration. Menopause 2011; 18(7): 766–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hendriks, DJ, te Velde, ER, Looman, CW, et al. The role of a poor response in the prediction of the cumulative ongoing pregancy rate in in vitro fertilisation. In: Dynamic and basal ovarian reserve tests for outcome prediction in IVF: comparisons and meta-analyses. Academic Thesis, Utrecht. 2005; 162–79.
Hendriks, DJ, Kwee, J, Mol, BW, te Velde, ER, Broekmans, FJ. Ultrasonography as a tool for the prediction of outcome in IVF patients: a comparative meta-analysis of ovarian volume and antral follicle count. Fertil Steril 2007; 87(4): 764–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, RT, Elkind-Hirsch, KE, Styne-Gross, A, Miller, KA, Frattarelli, JL. The predictive value for in vitro fertility delivery rates is greatly impacted by the method used to select the threshold between normal and elevated basal follicle-stimulating hormone. Fertil Steril 2008; 89(4): 868–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patrizio, P, Fragouli, E, Bianchi, V, Borini, A, Wells, D. Molecular methods for selection of the ideal oocyte. Reprod Biomed Online 2007;15(3): 346–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanghe, S, Van Soome, A, Nauwynck, H, Coryn, M, de Kruif, A. Minireview: Functions of the cumulus oophorus during oocyte maturation, ovulation, and fertilization. Mol Reprod Dev 2002; 61(3): 414–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adriaenssens, T, Segers, I, Wathlet, S, Smitz, J. The cumulus cell gene expression profile of oocytes with different nuclear maturity and potential for blastocyst formation. J Assist Reprod Genet 2011; 28(1): 31–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boomsma, CM, Macklon, NS. What can the clinician do to improve implantation? Reprod Biomed Online 2006; 13(6): 845–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broer, SL. Assessment of Current and Future Ovarian Reserve Status. Enschede, the Netherlands: Gildeprint Drukkerijen, 2011.Google Scholar
Eijkemans, MJ, Habbema, JDF, te Velde, ER. Age at last childbirth and fertility at young age. In: Eijkemans MJ, Fertility in populations and in patients. Academic Thesis, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam: the Netherlands. 2005; 23–34.
Broekmans, FJ, Faddy, MJ, Scheffer, G, te Velde, ER. Antral follicle counts are related to age at natural fertility loss and age at menopause. Menopause 2004; 11(6 Pt 1): 607–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×