NICE, Intrapartum care: care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth: clinical guideline 190; 2014. www.nice.org.uk.Google Scholar

Mahomed, K, Nyoni, R, Mulambo, T, Kasule, J, Jacobus, E. Randomised controlled trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. BMJ. 1994; 308: 497–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Herbst, A, Ingemarsson, I. Intermittent versus continuous electronic monitoring in labour: a randomised study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994; 101: 663–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ingemarsson, I, Arulkumaran, S, Ingemarsson, E, TambyRaja, RL, Ratnam, SS. Admission test: a screening test for fetal distress in labour. Obstet Gynecol. 1986; 68: 800–6.Google Scholar

Ingemarsson, I, Arulkumaran, S, Paul, RH, Ingemarsson, E, TambyRaja, RL, Ratnam, SS. Fetal acoustic stimulation in early labour in patients screened with the admission test. Am J of Obstet Gynecol. 1988; 158: 70–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Impey, L, Reynolds, M, MacQuillan, K, et al. Admission cardiotocography: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2003; 361: 465–70.Google ScholarPubMed

Mires, G, Williams, F, Howie, P. Randomised controlled trial of cardiotocography versus Doppler auscultation of fetal heart at admission in labour in low risk obstetric population. BMJ. 2001; 322(7300): 1457–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mitchell, K. The effect of the labour electronic fetal monitoring admission test on operative delivery in low-risk women: a randomised controlled trial. Evidence Based Midwifery. 2008; 6(1): 18–26.Google Scholar

Bix, E, Reiner, LM, Klovning, A, Oian, P. Prognostic value of the labour admission test and its effectiveness compared with auscultation only: a systematic review. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005; 112: 1595–604.Google ScholarPubMed

Devane, D, Lalor, JG, Daly, S, McGuire, W, Smith, V. Cardiotocography versus intermittent auscultation of fetal heart on admission to labour ward for assessment of fetal wellbeing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 15 (2). CD005122. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005122.pub4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wood, C, Renou, P, Oats, J, Farrell, E, Beischer, N, Anderson, I. A controlled trial of fetal heart rate monitoring in a low-risk obstetric population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981; 141(5): 527–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacDonald, D, Grant, A, Sheridan-Pereira, M, Boylan, P, Chalmers, I. The Dublin randomized controlled trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985; 152(5): 524–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Thacker, SB, Stroup, DF, Peterson, HB. Efficacy and safety of intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring: an update. Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 86(4 Pt 1): 613–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Grant, A, O'Brien, N, Joy, MT, Hennessy, E, MacDonald, D. Cerebral palsy among children born during the Dublin randomised trial of intrapartum monitoring. Lancet. 1989; 2(8674): 1233–6.Google ScholarPubMed

Vintzileos, AM, Nochimson, DJ, Guzman, ER, Knuppel, RA, Lake, M, Schifrin, BS. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 85(1): 149–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alfirevic, Z, Devane, D, Gyte, GM. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 31(5). CD006066. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006066.pub2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steer, P. ABC of labour care: assessment of mother and fetus in labour. BMJ. 1999; 318(7187): 858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Krebs, HB, Petres, RE, Dunn, LJ. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. V. Fetal heart rate patterns in the second stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981; 140 (4): 435–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nelson, KB, Dambrosia, JM, Ting, TY, Grether, JK. Uncertain value of electronic fetal monitoring in predicting cerebral palsy. NEJM. 1996; 334(10): 613–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gilstrap, LC, Hauth, JC, Toussaint, S. Second stage fetal heart rate abnormalities and neonatal acidosis. Obstet Gynecol. 1984; 63: 209–13.Google ScholarPubMed

Cahill, AG, Caughey, AB, Roehl, KA, Odibo, AO, Macones, GA. Terminal fetal heart decelerations and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 122(5): 1070–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Roy, KK, Baruah, J, Kumar, S, et al. Cesarean section for suspected fetal distress, continuous fetal heart monitoring and decision to delivery time. Ind J Pediatr. 2008; 75(12): 1249–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gilstrap, LC, Hauth, JC, Hankins, GD, Beck, AW. Second-stage fetal heart rate abnormalities and type of neonatal acidemia. Obstet Gynecol. 1987; 70(2): 191–5.Google ScholarPubMed

Sheiner, E, Hadar, A, Hallak, M, et al. Clinical significance of fetal heart rate tracings during the second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 97(5): 747–52.Google ScholarPubMed

NICE. Intrapartum care: care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth; 2007. www.publications.nice.org.uk/intrapartum-care-cg55. This guideline is an update of ‘The use of electronic fetal monitoring: the use and interpretation of cardiotocography in intrapartum fetal surveillance’ (Guideline C) issued in May 2001.Google Scholar

Samueloff, A, Langer, O, Berkus, M, et al. Is fetal heart rate variability a good predictor of fetal outcome? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994; 73(1): 39–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Spencer, JA, Johnson, P. Fetal heart rate variability changes and fetal behavioral cycles during labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986; 93(4): 314–21.Google ScholarPubMed

Cahill, AG, Roehl, KA, Odibo, AO, Macones, GA. Association and prediction of neonatal acidemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 207(3): 206-e1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Maso, G, Businelli, C, Piccoli, M, et al. The clinical interpretation and significance of electronic fetal heart rate patterns 2 h before delivery: an institutional observational study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012; 286(5): 1153–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Williams, KP, Galerneau, F. Intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns in the prediction of neonatal acidemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 188(3): 820–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schifrin, BS. The CTG and the timing and mechanism of fetal neurological injuries. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2004; 18(3): 437–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

NICHD. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: research guidelines for interpretation. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Research Planning Workshop. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177(6): 1385–90.Google Scholar

Krebs, HB, Petres, RE, Dunn, LJ, Smith, PJ. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. VII. The impact of mode of delivery on fetal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982; 143(2): 190–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Powell, OH, Melville, A, MacKenna, J. Fetal heart rate acceleration in labor: excellent prognostic indicator. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979; 134(1): 36–8.Google ScholarPubMed

Macones, GA, Hankins, GDV, Spong, CY, Hauth, J, Moore, T. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2008; 37(5): 510–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Spencer, JAD, Badawi, N, Burton, P, et al. The intrapartum CTG prior to neonatal encephalopathy at term: a case‐control study. BJOG. 1997; 104(1): 25–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cibils, LA. Clinical significance of fetal heart rate patterns during labor. II. Late decelerations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975; 123(5): 473–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Krebs, HB, Petres, RE, Dunn, LJ, Jordaan, HV, Segreti, A. Multifactorial analysis of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979; 133(7): 773–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Low, JA, Victory, R, Derrick, EJ. Predictive value of electronic fetal monitoring for intrapartum fetal asphyxia with metabolic acidosis. Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 93(2): 285–91.Google ScholarPubMed

Ellison, PH, Foster, M, Sheridan-Pereira, M, MacDonald, D. Electronic fetal heart monitoring, auscultation, and neonatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 164(5): 1281–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sameshima, H, Ikenoue, T. Predictive value of late decelerations for fetal acidemia in unselective low-risk pregnancies. Am J Perinatol. 2005; 22(1): 19–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Skupski, DW, Rosenberg, CR, Eglinton, GS. Intrapartum fetal stimulation tests: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 99(1): 129–34.Google ScholarPubMed

Roy, KK, Baruah, J, Kumar, S, et al. Cesarean section for suspected fetal distress, continuous fetal heart monitoring and decision to delivery time. Indian J Pediatr. 2008; 75(12): 1249–52. doi: 10.1007/s12098-008-0245-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Westgate, JA, Wibbens, B, Bennet, L, et al. The intrapartum deceleration in center stage: a physiologic approach to the interpretation of fetal heart rate changes in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 197(3): 236-e1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aldrich, CJ, D'Antona, D, Spencer, JAD, et al. Fetal heart rate changes and cerebral oxygenation measured by near infrared spectroscopy during the first stage of labour. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol. 1996; 64(2): 189–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ball, RH, Parer, JT. The physiologic mechanisms of variable decelerations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 166(6): 1683–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fleischer, A, Schulman, H, Jagani, N, Mitchell, J, Randolph, G. The development of fetal acidosis in the presence of an abnormal fetal heart rate tracing. I. The average for gestational age fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982; 144(1): 55–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gaziano, EP. A study of variable decelerations in association with other heart rate patterns during monitored labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979; 135(3): 360–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tortosa, MN, Acien, P. Evaluation of variable decelerations of fetal heart rate with the deceleration index: influence of associated abnormal parameters and their relation to the state and evolution of the newborn. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol. 1990; 34(3): 235–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morris, RK, Malin, G, Robson, SC, et al. Fetal umbilical artery Doppler to predict compromise of fetal/neonatal wellbeing in a high‐risk population: systematic review and bivariate meta‐analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 37(2): 135–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, E, Warrick, P, O'Keeffe, D. Variable decelerations: do size and shape matter? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012; 25(6): 648–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Özden, S, Demirci, F. Significance for fetal outcome of poor prognostic features in fetal heart rate traces with variable decelerations. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1999; 262(3–4): 141–9.Google ScholarPubMed

Parer, JT, Livingston, EG. What is fetal distress? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 162(6): 1421–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Katz, M, Wilson, SJ, Young, BK. Sinusoidal fetal heart rate. II. Continuous tissue pH studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980; 136(5): 594–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Johnson, TR, Compton, AA, Rotmensch, J, Work Johnson, BA , JW. Significance of the sinusoidal fetal heart rate pattern. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981; 139(4): 446–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Young, BK, Katz, M, Wilson, SJ. Sinusoidal fetal heart rate. I. Clinical significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980; 136(5): 587–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Winkler, CL, Hauth, JC, Martin Tucker, J, Owen, J, Brumfield, CG. Neonatal complications at term as related to the degree of umbilical artery acidemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 164(2): 637–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thorp, JA, Trobough, T, Evans, R, Hedrick, J, Yeast, JD. The effect of maternal oxygen administration during the second stage of labor on umbilical cord blood gas values: a randomized controlled prospective trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 172(2): 465–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fawole, B, Hofmeyr, GJ. Maternal oxygen administration for fetal distress. Cochrane Database Sys Rev. 2012; 12. CD000136. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000136.pub2.Google ScholarPubMed

McNamara, H, Johnson, N, Lilford, R. The effect on fetal arteriolar oxygen saturation resulting from giving oxygen to the mother measured by pulse oximetry. BJOG. 1993; 100(5): 446–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Westgren, M, Kruger, K, Ek, S, et al. Lactate compared with pH analysis at fetal scalp blood sampling: a prospective randomised study. BJOG. 1998; 105(1): 29–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kruger, K, Hallberg, B, Blennow, M, Kublickas, M, Westgren, M. Predictive value of fetal scalp blood lactate concentration and pH as markers of neurologic disability. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 181(5): 1072–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Herbst, A, Wölner-Hanssen, P, Ingemarsson, I. Risk factors for acidemia at birth. Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 90(1): 125–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Low, JA. Intrapartum fetal asphyxia: definition, diagnosis, and classification. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 176(5): 957–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nordström, L. Fetal scalp and cord blood lactate. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2004; 18(3): 467–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nordström, L, Achanna, S, Naka, K, Arulkumaran, S. Fetal and maternal lactate increase during active second stage of labour. BJOG. 2001; 108(3): 263–8.Google ScholarPubMed

Krüger, K, Kublickas, M, Westgren, M. Lactate in scalp and cord blood from fetuses with ominous fetal heart rate patterns. Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 92(6): 918–22.Google ScholarPubMed

Rosén, KG, Amer-Wåhlin, I, Luzietti, R, Norén, H. Fetal ECG waveform analysis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2004; 18(3): 485–514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mansano, RZ, Beall, MH, Ross, MG. Fetal ST segment heart rate analysis in labor: improvement of intervention criteria using interpolated base deficit. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007; 20(1): 47–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vayssiere, C, Haberstich, R, Sebahoun, V, et al. Fetal electrocardiogram ST-segment analysis and prediction of neonatal acidosis. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2007; 97(2): 110–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Olofsson, P, Ayres‐de‐Campos, D, Kessler, J, et al. A critical appraisal of the evidence for using cardiotocography plus ECG ST interval analysis for fetal surveillance in labor. Part II: the meta‐analyses. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014; 93(6): 571–86.Google ScholarPubMed

Dildy, GA. Fetal pulse oximetry. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 54(1): 66–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kühnert, M, Seelbach-Göebel, B, Butterwegge, M. Predictive agreement between the fetal arterial oxygen saturation and fetal scalp pH: results of the German multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 178(2): 330–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Seelbach-Göbel, B, Heupel, M, Kühnert, M, Butterwegge, M. The prediction of fetal acidosis by means of intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 180(1): 73–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nonnenmacher, A, Hopp, H, Dudenhausen, J. Predictive value of pulse oximetry for the development of fetal acidosis. J Perinatal Med. 2010; 38(1): 83–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dildy, GA, van den Berg, PP, Katz, M, et al. Intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry: fetal oxygen saturation trends during labor and relationship to delivery outcome. In Knitza, R (ed.), Hypoxische Gefährdung des Fetus sub partu (pp. 185–93). Darmstadt: Steinkopff; 1994.Google Scholar

Garite, TJ, Dildy, GA, McNamara, H, et al. A multicenter controlled trial of fetal pulse oximetry in the intrapartum management of non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 183(5): 1049–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

East, CE, Dunster, KR, Colditz, PB, Nath, CE, Earl, JW. Fetal oxygen saturation monitoring in labour: an analysis of 118 cases. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997; 37(4): 397–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

ACOG Committee. Fetal pulse oximetry: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Obstetric Practice. Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 98(3): 523–4.Google Scholar

NHS Litigation Authority. Ten Years of Maternity Claims: An Analysis of NHS Litigation Authority Data. London: NHSLA; 2012.Google Scholar

Confidential Enquiry into Stillbirths and Deaths in Infancy. 4th Annual Report. London: Maternal and Child Health Research Consortium; 1997.Google Scholar

Electronic Fetal Monitoring. www.e-lfh.org.uk/projects/electronic-fetal-monitoring.Google Scholar

Arulkumaran, S, Ingemarsson, I, Montan, S, et al. Traces of You: Fetal Trace Interpretation. Netherlands: Philips Medical Systems; 2002.Google Scholar