Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  • Home
Chapter
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
    Log in Register
  • Cited by 1
  • Print publication year: 2009
  • Online publication date: March 2010

Chapter 10 - Caesarean deliveries: indications, techniques and complications

Export citation

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

References

1. Royal College of Obstetricans and Gynaecologists Clinical Support Unit . The National Caesarean Section Audit Report. London: RCOG Press, 2001. Available online at: http://www.rcog.org.uk/resources/public/pdf/nscs_audit.pdf (accessed 30 January 2008).
2. Lucas D N , Yentis S M , Kinsella S M , et al. Urgency of caesarean section: a new classification. J R Soc Med 2000; 93: 346–50.
3. NCEPOD . Report of the National Confidential Enquiry into Perioperative Deaths 1992/1993. London: NCEPOD, 1995.
4. National Institute of Clinical Excellence . Clinical Guideline 13 Caesarean Section. London: RCOG Press, 2004. Available online at: http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/CG013fullguideline.pdf (accessed 30 January 2008).
5. Hannah M E , Hannah W J , Hewson S A , et al. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 2000; 356: 1375–83.
6. GRIT Study Group . A randomised trial of timed delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: short term outcomes and Bayesian interpretation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2003; 110: 27–32.
7. National Institute of Clinical Excellence . Clinical Guideline 55 Intrapartum Care. London: RCOG Press, 2007. Available online at: http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/IPCNICEGuidance.pdf (accessed 30 January 2008).
8. RCOG, RCM, RCA, RCPCH . Safer Childbirth. Minimum Standards for the Organisation and Delivery of Care in Labour. London: RCOG Press, 2007. Available online at: http://www.rcog.org.uk/resources/public/pdf/safer_childbirth_report_web.pdf (accessed 30 January 2008).
9. Welch C . Caesarean Section. RCOG Consent Advice 7. 2006. Available online at: http://www.rcog.org.uk/resources/Public/pdf/consent7_csection.pdf (accessed 30 January 2008).
10. Morrison J , Rennie J , Milton P . Neonatal respiratory morbidity and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective caesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102: 101–6.
11. Bujold E , Bujold C , Hamilton E F , Harel F , Gauthier R J . The impact of a single-layer or double-layer closure on uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: 1326–30.
12. Bamigboye A A , Hofmeyr G J . Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; 4: CD000163.
13. Gates S , Anderson E R . Wound drainage for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 1: CD004549.
14. Alderdice F , McKenna D , Dornan J . Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; 2: CD003577.
15. Nelson-Piercy C . Thromboprophylaxis during Pregnancy, Labour and after Vaginal Delivery. RCOG Guideline No. 37. 2006. Available online at: http://www.rcog.org.uk/resources/Public/pdf/green_top_28_thromboembolic_minorrevision.pdf (accessed 30 January 2008).
16. Alexander J M , Leveno K J , Hauth J , et al. Fetal injury associated with cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 885–90.
17. CEMACH . Saving Mothers' Lives. London: CEMACH, 2007.
18. Jolly J , Walker J , Bhabra K . Subsequent obstetric performance related to primary mode of delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 227–32.
19. Smith G C , Pell J P , Dobbie R . Caesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy. Lancet 2003; 362: 1779–84.
20. Silver R M , Landon M B , Rouse D J , et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 1226–32.