Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-8mjnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-19T02:27:49.557Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction: Debating the Consensuses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2017

Weitseng Chen
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor and Deputy Director of the Center for Asian Legal Studies at the National University of Singapore Faculty of Law.
Weitseng Chen
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
HTML view is not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Summary

China's rapid growth gave birth to the notion of “Beijing Consensus” to conceptualize China's seemingly unorthodox approach to development. The Beijing Consensus has generated much discussion in academia and public forums for some time and was advanced by many as a worthy rival to the neoliberal “Washington Consensus.” Despite the overwhelming interest in this notion, scant legal literature exists on how the Beijing Consensus affects the relationship between law and economic development – and even less literature provides a comprehensive review of its constituent components. Yet, it is the right time for legal scholars to investigate the debate about the two Consensuses and, more importantly, for China to reflect on the understanding of her own success. Summer 2015 witnessed the largest stock market collapse since China began reforming its economy in 1979. The market lost one-third of its value in just two weeks and triggered global panic. I recalled that a colleague once confident of China's economic prospects, then deeply frustrated, said, “The Chinese model is gone!” The contributors of this book go further, in fact a lot further, by contemplating whether the Chinese Model was ever born in the first place.

The vacuum of literature was the impetus for this book, a project that aims not only to provide a theoretical account of the Beijing Consensus but, more importantly, also to discuss the Beijing Consensus in respect of specific areas of law. This book does not focus on public law such as human rights, democracy, and constitutionalism – subject matter which has already received much treatment by modern China law studies scholars. Instead, this book focuses on areas of law that have received less attention, but yet, by general consensus, are vital for economic development. Areas such as tax, property, and corporate law are key areas of concern for orthodox law and development theory, including the Washington Consensus. As such, we think these areas deserve their due treatment as the fundamental concern of any law and development scholar interested in the Beijing Consensus is to know what are the institutional configurations of the various subsectors of China's legal system that have contributed to one of the greatest economic transitions in human history. Briefly, we ask, what exactly does the Beijing Consensus (if it truly exists) look like in the context of property, tax, corporate law, and other specific areas of law?

Type
Chapter
Information
The Beijing Consensus?
How China Has Changed Western Ideas of Law and Economic Development
, pp. 1 - 12
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Introduction: Debating the Consensuses
    • By Weitseng Chen, Assistant Professor and Deputy Director of the Center for Asian Legal Studies at the National University of Singapore Faculty of Law.
  • Edited by Weitseng Chen, National University of Singapore
  • Book: The Beijing Consensus?
  • Online publication: 28 April 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316481370.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Introduction: Debating the Consensuses
    • By Weitseng Chen, Assistant Professor and Deputy Director of the Center for Asian Legal Studies at the National University of Singapore Faculty of Law.
  • Edited by Weitseng Chen, National University of Singapore
  • Book: The Beijing Consensus?
  • Online publication: 28 April 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316481370.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Introduction: Debating the Consensuses
    • By Weitseng Chen, Assistant Professor and Deputy Director of the Center for Asian Legal Studies at the National University of Singapore Faculty of Law.
  • Edited by Weitseng Chen, National University of Singapore
  • Book: The Beijing Consensus?
  • Online publication: 28 April 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316481370.001
Available formats
×