Book contents
4 - Hobbes Against Anarchy
from Part I - Hobbesian Variations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 January 2016
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Before AnarchyHobbes and his Critics in Modern International Thought, pp. 104 - 140Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Abizadeh, Arash (2011). “Hobbes on the Causes of War: A Disagreement Theory,” American Political Science Review 105:2, pp. 298–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahrensdorf, Peter (2000). “The Fear of Death and the Longing for Immortality: Hobbes and Thucydides on Human Nature and the Problem of Anarchy,” American Political Science Review 94:3, pp. 579–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Airaksinen, Timo and Bertman, Martin (1989). Hobbes: War among Nations, Brookfield, VT.Google Scholar
Armitage, David (2006). “Hobbes and the Foundations of Modern International Thought,” in Tully, James, Brett, Annabel, with Hamilton-Bleakly, Holy (eds.), Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Aubrey, John (2000). Brief Lives: Together with, an Apparatus for the Lives of Our English Mathematical Writers; and, the Life of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, London.Google Scholar
Badie, Bertrand (2001). “Realism under Praise, or a Requiem? The Paradigmatic Debate in International Relations,” International Political Science Review 22:3, pp. 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benzoni, Gino and Zanato, Tiziano (eds.) (1982). “Fulgenzio Micanzio,” in Storici e Politici Veneti del Cinquecento e del Seicento, Milano & Napoli.Google Scholar
Boucher, David (1990). “Inter-community and International Relations in the Political Philosophy of Hobbes,” Polity 23:2, pp. 207–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, Annabel (1997). Liberty, Right and Nature: Individual Rights in Later Scholastic Thought, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brown, Chris (1998). “Contractarian Thought and the Constitution of International Society,” in Mapel, David, and Nardin, Terry (eds.), International Society: Diverse Ethical Perspectives, Princeton, NJ, pp. 132–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Hedley (1977). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Hedley (1981). “Hobbes and the International Anarchy,” Social Research 41, pp. 717–738.Google Scholar
Butterfield, Herbert and Wight, Martin (eds.) (1966). Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics, London.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry (1993). “From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School,” International Organization 47, pp. 327–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzan, Barry, Jones, Charles, and Little, Richard (1993). The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, E.H. (1939). The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations, New York.Google Scholar
Cromartie, Alan (2000). “Unwritten Law in Hobbesian Political Thought,” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2:2, pp. 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Mas, Enrico (1986). “Paolo Sarpi nelle lettere di Fulgenzio Micanzio al Cavendish,” in Fra Paolo Sarpi dei Servi di Maria. Atti del convegno di studio, Venezia 28–29–30 ottobre 1983, Venice.Google Scholar
Dessler, David (1989). “What’s at Stake in the Agent-Structure Debate?,” International Organization 43, pp. 441–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deudney, Daniel (2009). “Left Behind: Neorealism’s Truncated Contextual Materialism and Republicanism,” International Relations 23:3, pp. 341–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, Jack (2015). “The Discourse of Anarchy in IR,” International Theory 7, pp. 393–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunne, Tim (1998). Inventing International Society: A History of the English School, Basingstoke, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, Richard (1978). “The World Order Models Project and Its Critics: A Reply,” International Organization 32:2, pp. 531–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Andrew (1999). “The Civic Solution to the Crisis of English Colonization, 1609–1625,” Historical Journal 42, pp. 25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forde, Steven (1992). “Classical Realism,” in Nardin, Terry and Mapel, David (eds.), Traditions of International Ethics, New York.Google Scholar
Forsyth, Murray (1979). “Thomas Hobbes and the External Relations of States,” British Journal of International Studies 5:3, pp. 196–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel (2003). Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976, New York.Google Scholar
Gabrieli, Vittorio (1957). “Bacone, la Riforma e Roma Nella Versione Hobbesiana d’un Carteggio di Fulgenzio Micanzio,” English Miscellany 8, pp. 195–250.Google Scholar
Gauthier, David (1969). The Logic of Leviathan: The Moral and Political Theory of Thomas Hobbes, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gaubatz, Kurt Taylor (2001). “The Hobbesian Problem and the Microfoundations of International Relations Theory,” Security Studies 11:2, pp. 164–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Ian (2011). “The Triumph of Anti-liberalism? Reconciling Radicalism to Realism in International Relations Theory,” Political Studies Review 9:1, pp. 42–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, Donald (1984). “Thomas Hobbes’s Highway to Peace,” International Organization 38:2, pp. 329–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, James (1771). Oceana, ed. Toland, , The Oceana and Other Works of James Harrington, London.Google Scholar
Haslam, Jonathan (2002). No Virtue Like Necessity: Realist Thought in International Relations since Machiavelli, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1679). Behemoth, or An Epitome of the Civil Wars of England, from 1640 to 1660, London.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1969). The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic, ed. Tönnies, Ferdinand, 2nd edn, introd., Goldsmith, M.M., London.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1971). A Dialogue between a Philosopher and a Student of the Common Laws of England, Chicago.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1971). The Answer of Mr. Hobbes to Sr. William D’Avenant’s Preface, in D’Avenant, William, A Discourse upon Gondibert. An Heroick Poem Written by Sr. William D’Avenant with an Answer to It by Mr. Hobbes (Paris, 1650), ed. Gladish, David F., Sir William Davenant’s Gondibert, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1990). Behemoth, or the Long Parliament, ed. Holmes, Stephen, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1991). Man and Citizen: De Homine and De Cive, ed. Gert, Bernard, Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1995). Three Discourses: A Critical Modern Edition of a Newly Identified Work of the Young Hobbes, ed. Reynolds, Noel B. and Saxonhouse, Arlene W., Chicago.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1998). On the Citizen, ed. Tuck, Richard and Silverthorne, Michael, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hont, Istvan (1986). “The Language of Sociability and Commerce: Samuel Pufendorf and the Theoretical Foundations of the ‘Four-Stages’ Theory,” in Pagden, Anthony (ed.), Languages of Political Theory in Early Modern Europe, Cambridge, pp. 253–276.Google Scholar
Hont, Istvan (2005). Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Johnson, Laurie (1996). “Thucydidean Realism: Between Athens and Melos,” in Frankel, Benjamin (ed.), Roots of Realism, London, pp. 169–193.Google Scholar
Johnson, Laurie (2007). “Mathematici versus Dogmatici: Understanding the Realist Project through Hobbes,” in Clinton, David (ed.), The Realist Tradition and Contemporary International Relations, Baton Rouge, LA, pp. 96–116.Google Scholar
Johnson, Thomas (1996). “The Idea of Power Politics: The Sophistic Foundations of Realism,” in Frankel, Benjamin (ed.), Roots of Realism, London, pp. 194–247.Google Scholar
Keene, Edward (2002). Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. (1986). “Realism, Neorealism and the Study of World Politics,” in Keohane, Robert O. (ed.), Neorealism and Its Critics, New York.Google Scholar
Kratochwill, Friedrich (1984). “The Force of Prescriptions,” International Organization 38:4, pp. 685–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, G.W. (1988). Leibniz: Political Writings, ed. Riley, Patrick, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukes, Steven (2003). “The Question of Power: Europe versus America,” Constellations 10:3, pp. 352–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, Joseph (1974). “War and Ideology,” in Held, Virginia, Moregenbesser, Sidney, and Nagel, Thomas (eds.), Philosophy, Morality, and International Affairs, New York.Google Scholar
McLean, Iain (1981). “The Social Contract in Leviathan and the Prisoner’s Dilemma Super Game,” Political Studies 29:3, pp. 339–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molesworth, William (1839–45). The English Works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, London.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans (1948). Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, New York.Google Scholar
Navari, Cornelia (1982). “Hobbes and the Hobbesian Tradition in International Relations,” Millennium: The Journal of International Affairs 11, pp. 202–222.Google Scholar
Navari, Cornelia (1996). “Hobbes, the State of Nature and the Laws of Nature,” in Clark, Ian and Neumann, Iver B. (eds.), Classical Theories of International Relations, New York, pp. 20–41.Google Scholar
Newman, Saul (2012). “Crowned Anarchy: Postanarchism and International Relations Theory,” Millennium 40:2, pp. 259–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paganini, Gianni (ed.) (2000). The Return of Scepticism: From Hobbes and Descartes to Bayle, Vercelli, Italy.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1934). De Jure Naturae et Gentium Libri Octo [1672], trans. Oldfather, C.H., Oxford.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Noel and Hilton, John (1993). “Thomas Hobbes and Authorship of Horae Subsecivae,” History of Political Thought 14, pp. 361–380.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Noel and Saxonhouse, Arlene (1995). Three Discourses: A Critical Modern Edition of Newly Identified Work of the Young Hobbes, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Robertson, John (1995). “Empire and Union: Two Concepts of the Early Modern Political Order,” in Robertson, John (ed.), A Union for Empire: Political Thought and the British Union of 1707, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Rosow, Stephen (2009). “Paradigm, Tradition, and the Politics of Realism,” in Freyberg-Inan, Annette, Harrison, Ewan, and James, Patrick (eds.), Rethinking Realism in International Relations: Between Tradition and Innovation, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Sorell, Tom (2006). “Hobbes on Trade, Consumption and International Order,” Monist: An International Quarterly Journal of General Philosophical Inquiry 89:2, pp. 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (1999). “Hobbes and the Purely Artificial Person of the State,” The Journal of Political Philosophy 7:1, pp. 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Michael Joseph (1986). Realist Thought from Weber to Kissinger, Baton Rouge, LA.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch (1909). Tractatus Theologico-Politicus (Amsterdam, 1670), reprinted in RHM Elwes, The Chief Works of Benedict de Spinoza, vol. I, London.Google Scholar
Springborg, Patricia (2015). “Hobbes, Donne and the Virginia Company: Terra Nullius and ‘The Bulimia of Dominion’,” History of Political Thought 36, pp. 113–164.Google Scholar
Stein, Peter (2004). “The ‘Ius Commune’ and Its Demise,” The Journal of Legal History 25, pp. 161–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, Leo (1952). The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: Its Basis and Its Genesis, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard (1996). “Hobbes’s Moral Philosophy,” in Sorell, Tom (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard (1999). The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant, Oxford.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard (2004). “The Utopianism of Leviathan,” in Sorell, Tom and Fisneau, Luc (eds.), Leviathan after 350 Years, Oxford.Google Scholar
Vattel, Emer (2008). The Laws of Nature and Nations, Kapossy, Béla and Whatmore, Richard (eds.), Indiana, IN.Google Scholar
Vigezzi, Bruno (2005). The British Committee for the Theory of International Politics, 1954–1985: The Rediscovery of History, Milan Italy.Google Scholar
Vitoria, Francisco (1991). Relectiones de Indis, in Pagden, Anthony and Lawrence, Jeremy (eds.), Vitoria: Political Writings, Cambridge UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth (1991). “Realist Thought and Neorealist Theory,” in Rothstein, Robert (ed.), The Evolution of Theory in International Relations, Columbia, SC.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael (1980). Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Implications, London.Google Scholar
Welch, David A. (2003). “Why International Relations Theorists Should Stop Reading Thucydides,” Review of International Studies 29, pp. 301–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander (1987). “The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory,” International Organization 41, pp. 335–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Howard (1996). International Relations and the Limits of Political Theory, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Michael C. (2005). The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zouche, Richard (1650). Iuris et Iudicii Faecialis, sive, Iuris inter Gentes, et Quaestionum de Eodem Explicatio, Oxford.Google Scholar