Skip to main content Accessibility help
The Atlantic Alliance Under Stress
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 15
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Buy the print book

Book description

Can the political institutions of the transatlantic alliance endure the demise of the Soviet enemy? Did the Iraq crisis of 2002–3 signal the final demise of the Atlantic partnership? If so, what are the likely consequences? In this book a distinguished group of political scientists and historians from Europe and the United States tackle these questions. The book examines the causes and consequences of the crisis in Atlantic relations that accompanied the invasion of Iraq in March 2003. The authors' collective focus is not on the war itself, or how it was conducted, or even the situation in Iraq either before or after the conflict. Instead, the crisis over Iraq is the starting point for an examination of transatlantic relations and specifically the Atlantic alliance, an examination that is cross-national in scope and multi-disciplinary in approach.


'Of all the volumes devoted to the U.S.-European crisis over Iraq, this one, the result of a series of seminars at the European University Institute in 2002, is probably the most balanced and probing. Most of the authors deal not only with the 'blowup' of 2002–2003 but also with earlier tensions and trends, adding depth to their treatment of the crisis itself.'

Source: Foreign Affairs

'This volume does more than scratch the surface of a highly politicized transatlantic debate. It goes beyond the controversies of the moment and instead focuses on enduring questions … David Andrews has assembled a number of eminent scholars and seasoned observers of the transatlantic relationship from both sides of the Atlantic … In sum, this is an excellent collection of articles that is likely to stay the course of time. It offers a valuable array of perspectives and should be compulsory reading for scholars, students and the wider public interested in the recent development and the future of the Atlantic alliance.'

Source: International Affairs

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.


Ackermann, A., “Why Europe and America Don't See Eye to Eye,” International Politics 40 (March 2003), 121–136.
Aliboni, R., “Il dibattito sulla politica europea di sicurezza e difesa” [“The Debate on European Policy on Security and Defense”], in Istituto Affari Internazionali, L'Italia nella politica internazionale, 1993 (Rome: SIPI, 1993), 142–154.
Ambrose, Stephen E., Eisenhower: The President (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1984).
American Political Science Association, Committee on Political Parties, “Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System: A Report of the Committee on Political Parties,” American Political Science Review 44:3 (1950), part 2, supplement.
Andrews, D., “The United States and Its Atlantic Partners: The Evolution of American Grand Strategy,” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 17:3 (October 2004), 421–436.
Art, R. J., A Grand Strategy for America (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2003).
Ashdown, P., Ashdown Diaries: 1997–1999 (London: Penguin Books, 2001).
Asmus, R., Opening NATO's Door (New York: Columbia University Press, 2002).
Asmus, R.,“Rebuilding the Atlantic Alliance,” Foreign Affairs 82:5 (September–October 2003), 20–31.
Bacevich, A. J., American Empire: The Realities and Consequences of US Diplomacy (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2002).
Bailes, A. J. K., “NATO's New Response Force,” Transatlantic Internationale Politik 4:1 (Spring 2003), 25–29.
Balmond, L. (ed.), Les interventions militaires françaises en Afrique [French Military Interventions in Africa] (Paris: Pedone, 1998).
Barany, Z., “Hungary: Appraising a New NATO Member,” Clausewitz-Studien (1998), 3–31.
Barany, Z.,“The Military and Security Legacies of Communism,” in Barany, Z. and Volgyes, I. (eds.), The Legacies of Communism in Eastern Europe (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995), 101–117.
Barany, Z.,“An Outpost on the Troubled Periphery,” in Michta, America's New Allies, 74–111.
Becker, J. J., Crises et alternances 1974–2000 (Paris: Le Seuil, 2002).
Bennett, A., Condemned to Repetition? The Rise, Fall, and Reprise of Soviet–Russian Military Interventionism, 1973–1996 (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1999).
Bergner, J. T., The New Superpowers: Germany, Japan, the US and the New World Order (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1991).
Binder, S. A.The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock, 1947–1996,” American Political Science Review 93:3 (September 1999), 519–533.
Blair, T., New Britain: My Vision of a Young Country (London: Fourth Estate, 1996).
Blix, H., Disarming Iraq (London: Bloomsbury, 2004).
Bollmann, Y., Ce que veut l'Allemagne (Paris: Bartillat, 2003).
Bonnet, A., Iraq: le veto français (Paris: Les Dossiers de France Demain, 2003).
Bouton, M. and Page, B. (eds.), Worldviews 2002: American Public Opinion and Foreign Policy (Chicago: Chicago Council on Foreign Relations, 2002).
Bouton, M. and Page, B. (eds.),Worldviews 2002: Topline Data from US Public Survey (Chicago: Chicago Council on Foreign Relations, 2002).
Bozo, F., “The Effects of Kosovo and the Danger of Decoupling,” in Howorth, J. and Keeler, J. T. S. (eds.), Defending Europe: The EU, NATO and the Quest for Autonomy (London: Palgrave, 2003), 61–80.
Braithwaite, R., “End of the Affair,” Prospect (May 2003).
Brogi, A., L'Italia e l'egemonia americana nel Mediterraneo [Italy and American Hegemony in the Mediterranean] (Florence: Nuova Italia, 1996).
Brownlie, I., International Law and the Use of Force by States (New York: Oxford University Press, 1963).
Brzezinski, Z., The Choice: Global Domination or Global Leadership (New York: Basic Books, 2004).
Brzezinski, Z.,“The Premature Partnership,” Foreign Affairs 73:2 (March–April 1992), 67–82.
Brzezinski, Z.,“Where Do We Go from Here?” Transatlantic Internationale Politik 4:3 (Fall 2003), 3–10.
Buchanan, P. J., A Republic, Not An Empire: Reclaiming America's Destiny (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, 2002).
Caplan, G., “A Transatlantic Approach to the Middle East Conflict: Do We Have Enough in Common?,” AICGS/DAAD Working Paper Series (Washington, DC: AICGS 2003).
Carter, R. G., “Congress and Post-Cold War US Foreign Policy,” in Scott, J. M. (ed.), After the End: Making US Foreign Policy in the Post-Cold War World (Durham: Duke University Press, 1998), 108–137.
Chalmers, M., “The Atlantic Burden-Sharing Debate: Widening or Fragmenting?,” International Affairs 77:3 (2001), 569–585.
Churchill, W., A History of the English-Speaking Peoples (London: Cassell, 1956–8).
Clarke, R. A., Against All Enemies (New York: Free Press, 2004).
Cogan, C., French Negotiating Behavior: Dealing with La Grande Nation (Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 2003).
Cohen, S. and Smouts, M. C., La politique extérieure de Valéry Giscard d'Estaing (Paris: Presses de la FNSP, 1985).
Cointet, J. P., Lachaise, B., Béguec, G. and Mayeur, J. M. (eds.), Un politique: Georges Pompidou (Paris: PUF, 2001).
Coombs, C. A., The Arena of International Finance (New York: Wiley, 1976).
Cooper, R., The Breaking of Nations: Order and Chaos in the Twenty-First Century (London: Atlantic, 2003).
Cooper, R.,The Post-Modern State and the World Order (London: Demos, 1996).
Cornish, P., “The British Military View of European Security 1945–1950,” in Deighton, A. (ed.), Building Post-War Europe: National Decision-Makers and European Institutions, 1948–1963 (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995).
Cottey, A., Edmunds, T. and Forster, A., “Beyond Prague,” Nato Review 3 (2002), 1–5.
Cremasco, M., “L'Italia e la sicurezza internazionale” [“Italy and International Security”], in Istituto Affari Internazionali, L'Italia nella politica internazionale, 1994 (Roma: SIPI, 1994), 63–79.
Cuche, P., “Iraq: And If France Was Wrong?” [“Irak: et si la France s’était trompée?”], Politique Etrangère 99 (Summer 2003), 409–422.
Daalder, I. H., and Lindsay, J. M., America Unbound: The Bush Revolution in Foreign Policy (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2003).
Daalder, I. and O'Hanlon, M., Winning Ugly: NATO's War to Save Kosovo (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2000).
D'Alema, M., Kosovo: gli italiani e la guerra [Kosovo: The Italians and the War] (Milan: Mondadori, 1999).
Davis, J. W., “Victims of Success? Post Victory Alliance Politics,” NATO Research Fellowship Final Report (2000),
Gaulle, C., Discours et Messages, vol. IV (Paris: Plon, 1986).
Gaulle, C.,Mémoires d'espoir: le renouveau [Memories of Hope: The Renewal] (Paris: Plon, 1970).
Lacharrière, G., La politique juridique extérieure [Juridical Foreign Policy] (Paris: Economica, 1983).
Marenches, A. and Ockrent, C., Dans le secret des princes (Paris: Stock, 1986), translated into English, with Andelman, D., The Fourth World War: Diplomacy and Espionage in the Age of Terrorism (New York: Morrow, 1992).
Montbrial, T., L'action et le système du monde (Paris: PUF, 2002).
Montbrial, T.,“Franco-American Relations: A Historical-Structural Analysis,” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 17:3 (October 2004), 451–466.
Debré, M., et al. (eds.), Guy Ladreit de Lacharrière et la politique juridique extérieure de la France [Guy Ladreit de Lacharrière and France's Juridical Foreign Policy] (Paris: Masson, 1989).
Del Pero, M., L'alleato scomodo: gli USA e la DC negli anni del centrismo (1948–1955) [The Inconvenient Ally: The USA and the Christian Democrats in the Age of Centrism (1948–1955)] (Rome: Carocci, 2001).
Delafon, G. and Sancton, T., Dear Jacques, Cher Bill (Paris: Plon, 1999).
Delpech, T., “Bagdad: trois leçons pour une crise,” Politique Internationale 100 (Summer 2003).
Denison, A. B., Shades of Multilateralism: US Perspectives on Europe's Role in the War on Terrorism (Bonn: ZEI Discussion Paper No. 106, 2002).
DeSipio, L., Counting on the Latino Vote: Latinos as a New Electorate (Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press, 1996).
Destler, I. M., “Congress and Foreign Policy at Century's End: Requiem on Cooperation?,” in Dodd, L. C. and Oppenheimer, B. I. (eds.), Congress Reconsidered, 7th edition (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2001), 315–333.
Einheit, Deutsche, Sonderedition aus den Akten des Bundeskanzleramts (Munich: Oldenbourg, 1998).
Di Nolfo, E., “The United States and Italian Communism: World War II to the Cold WarJournal of Italian History 1:1 (1978), 74–94.
Di Nolfo, E.,Vaticano e Stati Uniti: dalle carte di Myron Taylor 1939–1952 [The Vatican and the United States: From the Documents of Myron Taylor 1939–1952] (Milan: F. Angeli, 1978).
Dini, L., Tra casa bianca e botteghe oscure: Fatti e retroscena di una stagione alla Farnesina [Between the White House and the Botteghe Oscure: Behind the Scenes of a Season at the Farnesina] (Milan: Guerini e Associati, 2001).
Dobbins, J., et al., America's Role in Nation-Building: From Germany to Iraq MR-1753 RC (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2003).
Duelfer, C., “The Inevitable Failure of Inspections in Iraq,” Arms Control Today, 32:7 (September 2002).
Duke, S., The Burdensharing Debate: A Reassessment (London: Macmillan, 1993).
Dunay, P., “Civil–Military Relations in Hungary: No Big Deal,” in Edmunds, T., Forster, A., and Cottey, A. (eds.), Democratic Control of the Military in Postcommunist Europe: Guarding the Guards (London: Palgrave, 2002), 64–87.
Duroselle, J. B., Tout empire périra: une vision historique des relations internationales (Paris: Armand Colin, 1982).
Ehrman, J., The Rise of Neoconservatism: Intellectuals and Foreign Affairs, 1945–1994 (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1995).
Epstein, R., “NATO Enlargement and the Spread of Democracy: Evidence and Expectation,” Security Studies 14:1 (Spring 2005).
Farer, T., “Beyond the Charter Frame: Unilateralism or Condominium?,” American Journal of International Law 96:2 (April 2002), 359–364.
Featherstone, K. and Ginsberg, R., The United States and the European Union in the 1990s: Partners in Transition (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1993).
Feldman, L. G., “The European Union's Enlargement Project and US–EU Cooperation in Central and Eastern Europe,” in Burwell, F. and Daalder, I. H. (eds.), The United States and Europe in the Global Arena (London: Macmillan, 1999), 44–82.
Forster, A., Edmunds, T. and Cottey, A. (eds.), The Challenge of Military Reform in Postcommunist Europe: Building Professional Armed Forces (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002).
Franck, T., Recourse to Force: State Action Against Threats and Armed Attacks (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002).
Franck, T.,“Terrorism and the Right of Self-Defense,” American Journal of International Law 95 (October 2001), 839–843.
Freedman, L. and Karsh, E., The Gulf Conflict, 1990–1991: Diplomacy and War in the New World Order (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993).
Frum, D., The Right Man (New York: Random House, 2003).
Fukuyama, F., “Has History Restarted Since September 11?,” John Bonython Lecture at the Centre for Independent Studies, Melbourne, Australia, August 8, 2002.
Gaddis, L., “History, Grand Strategy, and NATO Enlargement,” Survival 40:1 (1998), 145–151.
Gehrz, C. and Trachtenberg, M., “America, Europe, and German Rearmament, August–September 1950,” in Trachtenberg, M. (ed.), Between Empire and Alliance (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003), 1–32.
Gimbel, J., The American Occupation of Germany (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1970).
Giscard d'Estaing, V., Le pouvoir et la vie (Paris: Cie 12, 1991).
Glennon, M. J., “The Fog of Law: Self-Defense, Inherence, and Incoherence in Article 51 of the United Nations Charter,” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 25 (Spring 2002), 539–558.
Glennon, M. J.,Limits of Law, Prerogatives of Power: Interventionism After Kosovo (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001).
Gnesotto, N., La puissance et l'Europe (Paris: Presses de la FNSP, 1998).
Golden, J. R., NATO Burden-Sharing: Risks and Opportunities (Washington, DC: Praeger, Washington Papers 96, 1983).
Goldgeier, J., Not Whether But When: The US Decision to Enlarge NATO (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1999).
Gordon, P. H., and Shapiro, J., Allies at War: America, Europe, and the Crisis over Iraq (New York: McGraw-Hill/Brookings Institution Press, 2004).
Gorka, S., “Hungarian Military Reform and Peacekeeping Effort,” NATO Review (November 1995), 26–29.
Grant, L., “America's Liberal Jews,” Prospect 84 (March 2003), 52–54.
Granville, J., “The Many Paradoxes of NATO Enlargement,” Current History 98 (1999), 165–170.
Grayson, G., Strange Bedfellows: NATO Marches East (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1999).
Grosser, A., The Western Alliance (London: Macmillan, 1980).
Grzymala-Busse, A. and Luong, Jones P., “Reconceptualizing the State: Lessons from Post-Communism,” Politics and Society 30:4 (2002), 529–554.
Guérot, U., Kaiser, K., Koopmann, M., Lefebvre, M., de Montbrial, T., Defarges, P. M. and Stark, H., “Deutschland, Frankreich und Europa: Perspektiven” [Germany, France, and Europe: Perspectives], DGAP-Analyse No. 21 (German Council on Foreign Relations and the French Institute of Foreign Relations, January 2003).
Gutierrez, B., “Defense Reform in Central Europe and the Challenges of NATO Membership: The Case of Hungary,” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of California, San Diego (2002).
Haftendorn, H., Deutsche Aussenpolitik zwischen Selbstbeschränkung und Selbstbehauptung (Munich: DVA, 2001).
Haftendorn, H.,One Year After 9/11: A Critical Appraisal of German–American Relations, Thyssen German American Dialogue Seminar Series, AICGS, 2002,
Hamilton, D. S., German–American Relations and the Campaign Against Terrorism (Washington, DC: AICGS, 2002).
Harnisch, S. and Maull, H. W. (eds.), Germany as a Civilian Power? The Foreign Policy of the Berlin Republic (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2001).
Haselkorn, A., The Continuing Storm: Iraq, Poisonous Weapons, and Deterrence (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999).
Hassner, P., “Friendly Questions to America the Powerful,” In the National Interest 1:2 (Fall 2002).
Hassner, P.,“The United States: The Empire of Force or the Force of Empire?” (Paris: Chaillot Paper 54, European Union Institute for Security Studies, September 2002).
Hassner, P. and Vaïsse, J., Washington et le monde: dilemmes d'une superpuissance (Paris: CERI/Autrement, 2003).
Hendrickson, R., “Nato's Visegrad Allies: The First Test in Kosovo,” Journal of Slavic Military Studies 13:2 (2000), 25–38.
Henke, K. D., Die amerikanische Besetzung Deutschlands [The American Occupation of Germany] (Munich: Oldenbourg, 1995).
Henkin, L., How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy, 2nd edition (New York: Columbia University Press, 1979).
Henrikson, A., “Why the United States and Europe See the World Differently: An Atlanticist's Rejoinder to the Kagan Thesis,” European Union Studies Association Newsletter 16:3 (2003), 1–10.
Holsti, O. R., “Public Opinion and Foreign Policy,” in Lieber, R. J. (ed.), Eagle Rules? Foreign Policy and American Primacy in the Twenty-First Century (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2002), 16–46.
Holsti, O. R.,“Public Opinion and US Foreign Policy After the Cold War,” in Scott, J. M. (ed.), After the End: Making US Foreign Policy in the Post-Cold War World (Durham: Duke University Press, 1998), 138–169.
Holsti, O. R. and Rosenau, J. N., “Liberals, Populists, Libertarians, and Conservatives: The Link Between Domestic and International Affairs,” International Political Science Review 17:1 (1996), 29–54.
Holsti, O. R. and Rosenau, J. N.,“The Political Foundations of Elites’ Domestic and Foreign Policy Beliefs,” in Wittkopf, E. R. and McCormick, J. M. (eds.), The Domestic Sources of American Foreign Policy (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999), 33–50.
Horsefield, J. K. (ed.), The International Monetary Fund, 1945–1965, vol. III, Documents (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, 1969).
Howorth, J., “Foreign and Defence Policy Cooperation: European and American Perspectives,” in Peterson and Pollack, Europe, America, Bush, 13–27.
Howorth, J.,“France, Britain and the Euro-Atlantic Crisis,” Survival 45:4 (Winter 2003/4), 173–192.
Ikenberry, G. J., After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order After Major Wars (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001).
Ikenberry, G. J.,America Unrivaled: The Future of the Balance of Power (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002).
Ikenberry, G. J.,“The Political Foundations of Atlantic Order,” in Gardner, H. and Stefanova, R. (eds.), The New Transatlantic Agenda: Facing the Challenges of Global Governance (Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2001), 17–29.
Ilari, V., “La politica militare italiana” [“Italian Military Policy”], in Istituto Affari Internazionali, L'Italia nella politica internazionale, 1993 (Roma: SIPI, 1993), 203–229.
Institut für Zeitgeschichte, Akten zur Auswärtigen Politik der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1971 (Munich: Oldenbourg, 2002), vol. III.
Jacobson, G. C., “Party Polarization in National Politics: The Electoral Connection,” in Bond, J. R. and Fleisher, R. (eds.), Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2000), 9–30.
Jacoby, W., The Enlargement of the European Union and NATO: Ordering from the Menu in Central Europe (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004).
Jean, C., “La nostra sicurezza nel mondo balcanizzato” [“Our Security in a Balkanized World”], Limes 4 (1994), 201–212.
Jervis, R., “Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma,” World Politics 30:2 (1978), 167–214.
Joffe, J., “Who's Afraid of Mr. Big?,” The National Interest 64 (Summer 2001), 43–52.
Jones, C., “Nato Enlargement: Brussels as the Heir of Moscow,” Problems of Post-Communism 45:4 (1998), 44–55.
Jones, N., The Control Freaks (London: Politico's, 2001).
Jones-Correa, M., “Latinos and Latin America: A Unified Agenda?,” in Ambrosio, T. (ed.), Ethnic Identity Groups and US Foreign Policy (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2002), 115–130.
Kagan, R., “America's Crisis of Legitimacy,” Foreign Affairs (March–April 2004), 65–87.
Kagan, R.,Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order (New York: Knopf, 2003).
Kagan, R.,“Power and Weakness,” Policy Review 113 (June–July 2002,
Kahler, M., “The United States and Western Europe: The Diplomatic Consequences of Mr. Reagan,” in Oye, K. A., Lieber, R. J., and Rothchild, D. (eds.), Eagle Resurgent? The Reagan Era in American Foreign Policy (Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1987), 297–333.
Kampfner, J., Blair's Wars (London: Free Press, 2003).
Kampfner, J. and Riddell, P., “Blair's Five Wars,” Prospect 91 (October 2003), 40–43.
Kaplan, L. F., and Kristol, W., The War over Iraq: Saddam's Tyranny and America's Mission (San Francisco: Encounter Books, 2003).
Katzenstein, P., “Same War – Different Views: Germany, Japan, and Counter-terrorism,” International Organization 57 (Fall 2003), 731–760.
Katzenstein P.,“Uniting Germany in an Integrating Europe,” in Katzenstein, P. (ed.), Tamed Power: Germany in Europe (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1997), 1–48.
Kay, S., NATO and the Future of European Security (New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 1998).
Kelsen, H., Principles of International Law, 2nd edition (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1966).
Kennedy, C. and Bouton, M., “The Real Trans-Atlantic Gap,” Foreign Policy 133 (November–December 2002), 66–74.
Kerski, B., “Zwischen Desinteresse und Misstrauen: zur Krise in den deutsch– polnischen Beziehungen,” Internationale Politik 59:4 (2004), 31–40.
Khalizad, Z., From Containment to Global Leadership? America and the World After the Cold War (Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 1995).
King, D. C., “The Polarization of American Parties and the Mistrust of Government,” in Nye, J. S. Jr., Zelikow, P. D., and King, D. C. (eds.), Why People Don't Trust Government (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997), 155–178.
Kissinger, H., Diplomacy (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1994).
Kissinger, H.,Does America Need a Foreign Policy? Toward a Diplomacy for the Twenty-First Century (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2001).
Kissinger, H.,“What Kind of Atlantic Partnership?,” Atlantic Community Quarterly 7 (1969), 18–38.
Kitfield, J., “Damage Control,” National Journal, NATO Enlargement Daily Briefs, Op-Eds (July 18, 2003).
Klau, T., “France and Germany: A Re-Marriage of Convenience,” US–France Analysis Series, Brookings Institution (January 2003,
Kornelius, S., “Joschka Fischer's Long Journey,” Transatlantic Internationale Politik 4:3 (Fall 2003), 49–54.
Krasno, J. and Sutterlin, J., The United Nations and Iraq: Defanging the Viper (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2003).
Krauthammer, C., “The Unipolar Moment Revisited,” The National Interest 70 (Winter 2002–3), 5–17.
Krzeminski, A., “Poland's Home Is Europe,” Transatlantic Internationale Politik 4:3 (Fall 2003), 65–68.
Kull, S., Americans on Terrorism: Two Years After 9/11, Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA) and Knowledge Networks (September 9, 2003).
Kull, S.,Seeking a New Balance: A Study of American and European Public Attitudes on Transatlantic Issues (Washington, DC: Program on International Policy Attitudes, Center for International and Security Studies, University of Maryland, June 26, 1998).
Kull, S. and Destler, I. M., Misreading the Public: The Myth of a New Isolationism (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1999).
Kupchan, C. A., The End of the American Era: US Foreign Policy and the Geopolitics of the Twenty-First Century (New York: Knopf, 2002).
Kupchan, C. A.,“The End of the West,” Atlantic Monthly 290:4 (November 2002), 42–44.
Kupchan, C. A.,“The Rise of Europe, America's Changing Internationalism, and the End of US Primacy,” Political Science Quarterly 118:2 (Summer 2003), 205–231.
Lagorio, L., L'ultima sfida: gli euromissili [The Ultimate Challenge: Euromissiles] (Florence: Loggia de’ Lanzi, 1998).
Lambert, R., “Misunderstanding Each Other,” Foreign Affairs 82:2 (March–April 2003), 62–74.
Layne, C., “The Unipolar Illusion: Why New Great Powers Will Arise,” International Security 17:4 (Spring 1993), 5–51.
Ledeen, M. and Lewis, W., Débâcle: l’échec américain en Iran (Paris: Albin Michel, 1981).
Lerman, A., “Sense on Antisemitism,” Prospect 77 (August 2002), 34–39.
Lieven, A., “Speaking Up,” Prospect 86 (May 2003), 24–27.
Lind, M., “The Israel Lobby,” Prospect 73 (April 2002), 22–29.
Lind, M.,Made in Texas: George W. Bush and the Southern Takeover of American Politics (New York: Basic Books, 2003).
Lindley-French, J., Terms of Engagement: The Paradox of American Power and the Transatlantic Dilemma Post-11 September (Paris: Chaillot Papers, European Union Institute for Security Studies, May 2002).
Lindley-French, J.,“The Ties That Bind,” NATO Review (Autumn 2003, 3/english/art 2.html).
Lindsay, J. M., “The New Apathy: How an Uninterested Public Is Reshaping Foreign Policy,” Foreign Affairs 79:5 (September–October 2000), 2–8.
Lipset, S. M., American Exceptionalism (New York: W. W. Norton, 1996).
Little, R. and Wickham-Jones, M., New Labour's Foreign Policy: A New Moral Crusade? (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000).
Lucarelli, S., Europe and the Breakup of Yugoslavia: A Political Failure in Search of a Scholarly Explanation (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2000).
Lundestad, G., The American “Empire” (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).
Lundestad, G.,“Empire” by Integration: The United States and European Integration, 1945–1997 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).
Lundestad, G.,“‘Empire by Invitation’ in the American Century,” Diplomatic History 23:2 (Spring 1999), 189–217.
Lundestad, G.,“Empire by Invitation? The United States and Western Europe, 1945–1952,” Journal of Peace Research 23:3 (1986), 263–277.
Lundestad, G.,The United States and Western Europe Since 1945: From “Empire” by Invitation to Transatlantic Drift (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).
Luoma-aho, M., “‘Arm’ Versus ‘Pillar’: The Politics of Metaphors of the Western European Union at the 1990–1991 Intergovernmental Conference on Political Union,” Journal of European Public Policy 11:1 (February 2004), 106–127.
Maelstaf, G., Que faire de l'Allemagne? Les responsables français, le statut international de l'Allemagne et le problème de l'unité allemande (1945–1955) (Paris: Ministère des Affaires Etrangères, 1999).
Marcellin, R., L'importune vérité (Paris: Plon, 1978).
Mausbach, W., “European Perspectives on the War in Vietnam,” German Historical Institute Bulletin 30 (2002), 71–86.
Meacham, J., Franklin and Winston: An Intimate Portrait of an Epic Friendship (New York: Random House, 2003).
Mead, W. R., Special Providence: American Foreign Policy and How It Changed the World (New York: Century Foundation, 2002).
Mearsheimer, J., “Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After the Cold War,” International Security 15:1 (July–August 1990), 5–56.
Menon, A. and Lipkin, J., European Attitudes Towards Transatlantic Relations, 2000–2003: An Analytical Survey (Birmingham: European Research Institute, 2003).
Menotti, R., “Italy and NATO: The Unsinkable Carrier and the Mediterranean,” What Italy Stands For – Limes (Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 1997), 15–29.
Michta, A. (ed.), America's New Allies: Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic in NATO (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1999).
Michta, A. (ed.),“Poland: A Linchpin of Regional Security,” in Michta, America's New Allies, 40–73.
Michta, A. (ed.),Red Eagle: The Army in Polish Politics, 1944–1988 (Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, 1990).
Michta, A. (ed.),The Soldier-Citizen: The Politics of the Polish Army After Communism (London: Macmillan, 1997).
Miller, J. E., The United States and Italy, 1940–1950: The Politics and Diplomacy of Stabilization (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1984).
Moravcsik, A., “Striking a New Transatlantic Bargain,” Foreign Affairs 82:4 (July–August 2003), 74–89.
Morgenthau, H., Politics Among Nations, 3rd edition (New York: Knopf, 1961).
NATO, NATO Handbook (Brussels: NATO Office of Information and Press, 2001).
Nincic, M., Rose, R. and Gorski, G., “The Social Foundations of Adjustment,” in Trubowitz, P., Goldman, E. O., and Rhodes, E. (eds.), The Politics of Strategic Adjustment: Ideas, Institutions, and Interests (New York: Columbia University Press, 1999), 176–209.
Ninkovich, F., “The United States, NATO, and the Lessons of History,” in Kotlowski, D. J. (ed.), The European Union: From Jean Monnet to the Euro (Athens: Ohio University Press, 2000), 203–212.
Nordlinger, E., Isolationism Reconfigured: American Foreign Policy for a New Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995).
Nuti, L., “Dall'operazione Deep Rock all'operazione Pot Pie: una storia documentata dei missili SM 78 Jupiter in Italia” [“From Operation Deep Rock to Operation Pot Pie: A Documentary History of SM 78 Jupiter Missiles in Italy”], Storia delle Relazioni Internazionali 11/12:1 (1996–7) and 2 (1996–7), 95–138 and 105–149.
Nuti, L.,“Italy and the Battle of the Euromissiles,” in Njolstad, O. (ed.), The Last Decade of the Cold War: From Conflict Escalation to Conflict Transformation (London: Frank Cass, 2004), 332–359.
Nye, J. S. Jr., The Paradox of American Power: Why the World's Only Superpower Can't Go It Alone (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).
Olson, M. and Zeckhauser, R., “An Economic Theory of Alliances,” Review of Economics and Statistics 48 (1966), 266–279.
Oppenheim, L., “The Science of International Law: Its Task and Method,” American Journal of International Law 2:2 (April 1908), 313–356.
Pells, R., Not Like Us: How Europeans Have Loved, Hated and Transformed American Culture Since World War II (New York: Basic Books, 1997).
Perthes, V., “The Advantages of Complementarity: The Middle East Peace Process,” in Gardner, H. and Stefanova, R. (eds.), The New Transatlantic Agenda: Facing the Challenges of Global Governance (Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2001), 103–121.
Peterson J., “The US and Europe in the Balkans,” in Peterson and Pollack, Europe, America, Bush, 85–98.
Peterson, J. and Green Cowles, M., “Clinton, Europe and Economic Diplomacy: What Makes the EU Different?,” Governance 11:3 (July 1998), 251–271.
Peterson, J. and Pollack, M. A. (eds.), Europe, America, Bush: Transatlantic Relations in the Twenty-First Century (London and New York: Routledge, 2003).
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, The 2004 Political Land-scape: Evenly Divided and Increasingly Polarized (November 5, 2003,
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press,“America's Image Further Erodes, Europeans Want Weaker Ties” (March 18, 2003,
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press,Views of a Changing World (June 2003,
Philippi, N., “Civilian Power and War: The German Debate About Out-of-Area Operations 1990–1999,” in Harnisch and Maull, Germany as a Civilian Power?, 49–67.
Poggiolini, I., “Italian Revisionism After World War II: Status and Security Problems, 1947–1957,” in Ahmann, R. (ed.), The Quest for Stability: Problems of Western European Security 1918–1957 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993), 327–359.
Pollack, K., “Spies, Lies, and Weapons: What Went Wrong,” Atlantic Monthly January–February 2004, 78–92.
Pollack, K.,The Threatening Storm: The Case for Invading Iraq (New York: Random House, 2002).
Pollack, M., “Unilateral Europe, Multilateral America?,” in Peterson and Pollack, Europe, America, Bush, 115–127.
Pollack, M. and Shaffer, G. (eds.), Transatlantic Governance in the Global Economy (London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001).
Pond, E., Friendly Fire: The Near Death of the Transatlantic Alliance (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2004).
Posen, B. R. and Ross, A. L., “Competing Visions for US Grand Strategy,” International Security 21:3 (Winter 1996), 5–53.
Program on International Policy Attitudes, Americans on Globalization (Washington, DC: Center for International and Security Studies, University of Maryland, March 28, 2000).
Quinlan, J. and Chandler, M., “The US Trade Deficit: A Dangerous Obsession,” Foreign Affairs 80:3 (May–June 2001), 87–97.
Revel, J. F., L'obsession anti-américaine: son fonctionnement, ses causes, ses inconséquences [The Anti-American Obsession: Its Function, Its Causes, Its Inconsistencies] (Paris: Plon, 2002).
Rice, C., “Promoting the National Interest,” Foreign Affairs 79:1 (January–February 2000), 45–62.
Riddell, P., Hug Them Close: Blair, Clinton and the Special Relationship (London: Politico's, 2003).
Risse, T., Beyond Iraq: Challenges to the Transatlantic Security Community, AICGS/German–American Dialogue Working Paper Series (Washington, DC: AICGS 2003).
Risse, T.,“Constructivism and International Institutions: Toward Conversations Across Paradigms,” in Katznelson, I. and Milner, H. V. (eds.), Political Science: State of the Discipline (New York: W. W. Norton, 2002), 597–629.
Robin, G., “Sens et enjeu de la guerre d'Iraq,” Géopolitique 82 (April–June 2003), 3–10.
Rohde, D. W., “Partisanship, Leadership, and Congressional Assertiveness in Foreign and Defense Policy,” in Deese, D. (ed.), The New Politics of American Foreign Policy (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1993), 76–101.
Roosevelt, F., Public Papers and Addresses of Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1940 volume (New York: Macmillan, 1941).
Ruggie, J., “Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order,” International Organization 36 (1982), 379–415.
Ruggie, J.,“The Past as Prologue? Interests, Identity, and American Foreign Policy,” International Security 21:4 (Spring 1997), 89–125.
Sacco, G., “Tra Europa e mare aperto: un'agenda per il nostro governo” [“Between Europe and the Deep Blue Sea: An Agenda for Our Government”], Limes 5 (2002), 75–86.
Schelling Study Group Report, “Report on Strategic Developments over the Next Decade for the Inter-Agency Panel,” National Security Files, Box 376, John F. Kennedy Library, Boston (October 1962).
Schlesinger, A. Jr., “Eyeless in Iraq,” New York Review of Books (October 23, 2003), 24–27.
Schwartz, T. A., Lyndon Johnson and Europe: In the Shadow of Vietnam (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2003).
Scott, F. and Osman, A., “Identity, African-Americans, and US Foreign Policy: Differing Reactions to South African Apartheid and the Rwandan Genocide,” in Ambrosio, T. (ed.), Ethnic Identity Groups and US Foreign Policy (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2002), 71–91.
Seldon, A., Major: A Political Life (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1997).
Silj, A. (ed.), L'alleato scomodo. I rapporti tra Roma e Washington nel Mediterraneo: Sigonella e Gheddafi [The Inconvenient Ally. Relations Between Rome and Washington in the Mediterranean: Sigonella and Gaddafi] (Milan: Corbaccio, 1998).
Simma, B. (ed.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary, 2 vols., 2nd edition (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002).
Simon, J., “Partnership for Peace (PFP): After the Washington Summit and Kosovo,” Strategic Forum 167 (1999), 1–5.
Simon, J.,Poland and NATO: A Study in Civil–Military Relations (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004).
SIPRI (Stockholm International Peace Research Institute), SIPRI Yearbook: Armaments, Disarmament, and International Security (Stockholm: SIPRI, 2002).
Skidelsky, R., “Imbalance of Power,” Foreign Policy 129 (March–April 2002), 46–55.
Smith, T., Foreign Attachments: The Power of Ethnic Groups in the Making of American Foreign Policy (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000).
Soutou, G. H., L'alliance incertaine: les rapports politico-stratégiques franco- allemands, 1954–1996 (Paris: Fayard, 1996).
Soutou, G. H.,“De Gaulle's France and the Soviet Union from Conflict to Détente,” in Loth, W. (ed.), Europe, Cold War and Coexistence, 1953–1965 (London: Frank Cass, 2003), 173–189.
Soutou, G. H.,“France, Nations and Empires from the Nineteenth Century to the Present Day: Between Jacobin Tradition, European Balance of Power and European Integration,” in Cavanna, H. (ed.), Governance, Globalization and the European Union: Which Europe for Tomorrow? (Dublin: Four Courts Press, 2002), 69–86.
Soutou, G. H.,“Georges Pompidou and US–European Relations,” in Trachtenberg, M. (ed.), Between Empire and Alliance: America and Europe During the Cold War (New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003), 157–200.
Soutou, G. H.,“President Pompidou, the Ostpolitik and the Strategy of Détente,” unpublished typescript.
Stephens, P., Tony Blair: The Making of a World Leader (New York: Viking, 2004).
Stone, J., Aggression and World Order: A Critique of United Nations Theories of Aggression (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1958).
Stothard, P., Thirty Days: An Inside Account of Tony Blair at War (New York: Harper Collins, 2003).
Stürmer, M., Die Kunst des Gleichgewichts: Europa in einer Welt ohne Mitte (Berlin: Propyläen, 2001).
Szabo, S., Parting Ways: The Crisis in German–American Relations (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2004).
Szayna, T., “A Small Contributor or a ‘Free Rider?,’ ” in Michta, America's New Allies, 112–148.
Szayna, T. and Larrabee, F. S., East European Military Reform After the Cold War: Implications for the United States (Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 1995).
Takle, M., “Towards a Normalisation of German Security and Defence Policy: German Participation in International Military Operations,” ARENA Working Papers 02:10 (2002,
Tardy, T., La France et la gestion des conflits yougoslaves (1991–1995): Enjeux et leçons d'une opération de maintien de la paix de l'ONU [France and the Management of the Yugoslav Conflicts (1991–1995): States and Lessons from a UN Operation to Maintain the Peace] (Brussels: Bruylant, 1999).
Taylor, B., “Russia's Passive Army: Rethinking Military Coups,” Comparative Political Studies 34:8 (2001), 924–952.
Thatcher, M., The Downing Street Years (London: Harper Collins, 1993).
Thomas, H., The Suez Affair (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1970).
Timmerman, K., The French Betrayal of America (New York: Crown Forum, 2004).
Trachtenberg, M., “The Bush Strategy in Historical Perspective,” to be published in Wirtz, James J. and Larsen, Jeffrey A. (eds), Nuclear Transformation: The New US Nuclear Doctrine (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).
Trachtenberg, M.,A Constructed Peace: The Making of the European Settlement, 1945–1963 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999).
Trachtenberg, M.,History and Strategy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991).
Trachtenberg, M.,“The Question of Realism: An Historian's View,” Security Studies 13:1 (Fall 2003), 156–194.
Trachtenberg, M.,“Waltzing to Armageddon?,” The National Interest (Fall 2002), 144–152.
Trubowitz, P., Defining the National Interest: Conflict and Change in American Foreign Policy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).
Ulrich, M. P., “Developing Mature National Security Systems in Postcommunist States: The Czech Republic and Slovakia,” Armed Forces and Society 28:3 (2002), 403–425.
United Kingdom, Foreign Office, A Commentary on the Charter of the United Nations, Cmd. 6666 of 1945 (London: HMSO, 1945).
Vachudová, M., “The Atlantic Alliance and the Kosovo Crisis: The Impact of Expansion and the Behavior of New Allies,” in Martin, P. and Brawley, M. (eds.), Alliance Politics, Kosovo, and NATO's War: Allied Force or Forced Allies? (New York: St. Martin's, 2001), 201–220.
Eekelen, W. F., Debating European Security, 1948–1998 (The Hague: SDU Publishers, 1998).
Vedrine, H. and Moïsi, D., France in an Age of Globalization, translated by P. H. Gordon (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2001).
Villepin, D., Un autre monde (Paris: L'Herne, 2003).
Villepin, D.,“Diplomatie et action, entretien avec Dominique de Villepin,” Supplement to Politique Internationale, 102 (Winter 2003–4), 5–62.
Vlachová, M., “Professionalisation of the Army of the Czech Republic,” in Forster, Edmunds, and Cottey, The Challenge of Military Reform in Postcommunist Europe, 34–48.
Wallace, W. and Musu, C., “The Focus of Discord? The Middle East in US Strategy and European Aspirations,” in Peterson and Pollack, Europe, America, Bush, 99–114.
Wallander, C. A., “Institutional Assets and Adaptability: NATO After the Cold War,” International Organization 54:4 (2000), 705–735.
Walt, S. M., The Origins of Alliances (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987).
Waltz, K. N., “The Emerging Structure of International Politics,” International Security 18:2 (Autumn 1993), 44–79.
Waltz, K. N.,“Structural Realism After the Cold War,” International Security 25:1 (Summer 2000), 5–41.
Waltz, K. N.,Theory of International Politics (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979).
Waltz, K. N. and Sagan, S., The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A Debate Renewed (New York: Norton, 2003).
Walzer, M., Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations (New York: Basic Books, 1977).
Wauthier, C., Quatre présidents et l'Afrique. De Gaulle, Pompidou, Giscard d'Estaing, Mitterrand: Quarante ans de politique africaine [Four Presidents and Africa. De Gaulle, Pompidou Giscard d'Estaing, Mitterrand: Forty years of African Policy] (Paris: Seuil, 1995).
Williams, P., The Senate and US Troops in Europe (London: Palgrave, 1985).
Wilson, W., War Messages, 65th Congress, 1st Session, Senate Doc. No. 5, Serial No. 7264 (Washington, DC, 1917).
Wilzewski, J., “Back to Unilateralism: The Clinton Administration and the Republican-Led Congress,” in Dembinski, M. and Gerke, K. (eds.), Cooperation or Conflict? Transatlantic Relations in Transition (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1998), 23–43.
Wohlforth, W. C., “The Stability of a Unipolar World,” International Security 21:1 (Summer 1999), 1–36.
Woodward, B., Bush at War (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2002).
Woodward, B.,Plan of Attack (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2004).
Wyatt-Walter, H., The European Community and the Security Dilemma 1989–1992 (London: Macmillan, 1997).
Yaniszewski, M., “Postcommunist Civil–Military Reform in Poland and Hungary: Progress and Problems,” Armed Forces and Society 28:3 (2002), 385–402.
Yost, D., NATO Transformed: The Alliance's New Roles in International Security (Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 1998).
Zimmermann, H., “Governance by Negotiation: The EU, the United States and China's Integration into the World Trade System,” in Schirm, S. (ed.), Global Economic Governance (London: Palgrave, 2003), 67–86.
Zimmermann, H.,Money and Security: Troops, Monetary Policy, and West Germany's Relations with the United States and Britain, 1950–1971 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).
Znoj, M., “Czech Attitudes Toward the War,” East European Constitutional Review 8:3 (1999), 47–50.


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.