Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T22:01:36.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - A Sociocultural Perspective on Opportunity to Learn

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

James Paul Gee
Affiliation:
Mary Lou Fulton Presidential Professor of Literacy Studies, Arizona State University
Pamela A. Moss
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Diana C. Pullin
Affiliation:
Boston College, Massachusetts
James Paul Gee
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Edward H. Haertel
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Lauren Jones Young
Affiliation:
The Spencer Foundation, Chicago
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The field of psychometrics has been predominant in work on testing and assessment. For the most part, psychometrics has been strongly influenced by traditional psychological assumptions about the mind and learning. Work that takes a sociocultural perspective has played a much smaller role and has heretofore made little contact with psychometrics. This chapter discusses contributions such a sociocultural perspective has to make to issues of assessment and testing, with a focus on an expanded notion of opportunity to learn (OTL). Ensuring that all learners have had equal OTL is both an ethical prerequisite for fair assessment and a solid basis on which to think about educational reforms that will ensure that all children can succeed at school. It is also a point at which mutually informing discussion can occur between people working in psychometrics and those working on sociocultural approaches to learning.

This section begins with a consideration of the traditional perspective in psychology, one that views knowledge and learning through the lens of mental representations in individuals' heads (Clancey 1997). Even in this traditional view, many of the types of issues that sociocultural perspectives emphasize also arise, although in a more backgrounded way. I will then turn to a more direct consideration of sociocultural perspectives, starting with the relationship between learners and their learning environments. In subsequent sections, I will spell out this relationship in terms of the connections between learning and learners' experiences in the world; how knowledge is distributed across people and their tools; the central importance of people's participation in shared talk and social practices; and the nature of the special varieties of language used in talk and participation when people learn in content areas in school – areas like math, science, social studies, and literature.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barsalou, L. W. 1999a. Language comprehension: Archival memory or preparation for situated action. Discourse Processes 28: 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. 1999b. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 57–660.Google Scholar
Barton, D. 1994. Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Barton, D. and Tusting, K.. 2005. Beyond communities of practice: Language power and social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bransford, J., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R.. 2000. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Brown, A. L. 1994. The advancement of learning. Educational Researcher 23: 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. L., Collins, A., and Dugid, P.. 1989. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher 18: 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Center for Activity Theory and Developmental Work Research. 2003. The activity system. http://www.edu.helsinki.fi/activity/pages/chatanddwr/activitysystem/.
Chall, J. S., Jacobs, V., and Baldwin, L.. 1990. The reading crisis: Why poor children fall behind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Churchland, P. M. 1995. The engine of reason, the seat of the soul. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Churchland, P. S. and Sejnowski, T. J.. 1992. The computational brain. Cambridge: Bradford/MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clancey, W. J. 1997. Situated cognition: On human knowledge and computer representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A. 1989. Microcognition: Philosophy, cognitive science, and parallel distributed processing. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A. 1997. Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A. 2003. Natural-born cyborgs: Why minds and technologies are made to merge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, M. and Y. Engeström. 1993. A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In Distributed cognition: Psychological and educational considerations, edited by Salomon, G., 1–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corder, S. P. 1967. The significance of learners' errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics 5: 160–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, K. and M. Jacobs. 2002. Islands of expertise and the development of family scientific literacy. In Learning conversations in museums, edited by Leinhardt, G., Crowley, K., and Knutson, K., 333–56. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Delpit, L. 1995. Other people's children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
diSessa, A. A. 2000. Changing minds: Computers, learning, and literacy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
DuFour, R. and Eaker, R.. 1998. Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Bloomington, Ind.: Solution Tree.Google Scholar
Dulay, H. and Krashen, S.. 1982. Language two. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. 1997. Second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Engeström, Y. 1987. Learning by expanding. An activity theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta Konsultit.Google Scholar
Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., Punamäki, R.-L., eds. 1999. Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, E. and Resnick, L.. 2001. Developing principals as instructional leaders. Phi Delta Kappan 82: 598–606.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. 1975. The language of thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fullan, M. and Hargreaves, A.. 1991. What's worth fighting for in your school?New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Gass, S. M. 1997. Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. 1992. The social mind: Language, ideology, and social practice. New York: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. 1996. Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in Discourses, 2nd ed. London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. 2002. Literacies, identities, and discourses. In Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: Meaning with power, edited by Schleppegrell, M. and Colombi, M. Cecilia, 159–75. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. 2003. What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. 2004. Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. 2005. An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. 2008. Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses, 3rd ed. London: Routledge/Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P., Hull, G., and Lankshear, C.. 1996. The new work order: Behind the language of the new capitalism. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. 1977. The theory of affordances. In Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology, edited by Shaw, R. and Bransford, J., 67–82. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. 1979. The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Glenberg, A. M. 1997. What is memory for?Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20: 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenberg, A. M. and Robertson, D. A.. 1999. Indexical understanding of instructions. Discourse Processes 28: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greeno, J. 1997. On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher 26: 5–17.Google Scholar
Greeno, J. 1998. The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist 53: 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagel, J. and Brown, J. S.. 2005. The only sustainable edge: Why business strategy depends on productive friction and dynamic specialization. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1973. Language in a social perspective: Explorations in the functions of language. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1985a. Spoken and written language. Victoria: Deakin University.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1985b. An introduction to functional grammar. London/Baltimore: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. and Martin, J. R.. 1993. Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.. 1999. Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hanks, W. F. 1996. Language and communicative practices. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Heath, S. B. 1983. Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holland, D. and Quinn, N., eds. 1987. Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, E. 1995. Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. 1983. Principles and practices in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1972. Language in the inner city: Studies in Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1974. The art of sounding and signifying. In Language in its social setting, edited by Gage, W., 84–116. Washington, D.C.: Anthropological Society of Washington.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 1999. Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lave, J. 1996. Teaching, as learning, in practice, Mind, Culture, and Activity. 3: 149–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, J. and Wenger, E.. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. D. 1993. Signifying as a scaffold for literary interpretation: The pedagogical implications of an African American discourse genre. Urbana, Ill.: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
Lee, C. D. 1995. A culturally based cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching African American high school students skills in literary interpretation. Reading Research Quarterly 30: 608–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. D. 1997. Bridging home and school literacies: Models for culturally responsive teaching, a case for African American English. In A handbook for literacy educators: Research on teaching the communicative and visual arts, edited by Flood, J., Heath, S. B., and Lapp, D., 334–45. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lee, C. D. 2001. Is October Brown Chinese? A cultural modeling activity system for underachieving students. American Educational Research Journal 38: 97–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, J. and Milroy, L.. 1985. Authority in language: Investigating language prescription and standardisation. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, A. and Simon, H. A.. 1972. Human problem solving. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Norman, D. A. 1988. The design of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ochs, E., R. Smith, D. Rudolph, and C. Taylor. 1992. Storytelling as a theory-building activity. Discourse Processes 15: 37–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pylyshyn, Z. 1984. Computation and cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Research round-up. Spring 2003. American Educator.
Rickford, J. R. and Rickford, R. J.. 2000. Spoken soul: The story of Black English. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Schleppegrell, M. 2004. Language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schleppegrell, M. and Colombi, M. C., eds. 2002. Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: Meaning with power, 159–75. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Scollon, R. and Scollon, S. W.. 1981. Narrative, literacy, and face in interethnic communication. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar
Shuman, A. 1986. Storytelling rights: The uses of oral and written texts by urban adolescents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smitherman, G. 1977. Talkin and testifin: The language of Black America. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Strauss, C. and Quinn, N.. 1997. A cognitive theory of cultural meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, D. 1983. Family literacy: Young children learning to read and write. Portsmouth, N.H.: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Taylor, D. and Dorsey-Gaines, C.. 1987. Growing up literate: Learning from inner city families. Portsmouth, N.H.: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. 1999. The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, E., McDermott, R., and Snyder, W. M.. 2002. Cultivating communities of practice. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. 1998. Mind as action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×