Book contents
- As War Ends
- As War Ends
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 The Complexity of the Organizational Design for Implementation of a Peace Accord
- 2 Violence, Grassroots Pressure, and Civil War Peace Processes
- 3 Land, Violence, and the Colombian Peace Process
- 4 Determinants of State Strength and Capacity
- 5 The Threat of Organized Crime in Post-Conflict Colombia
- 6 Violence after Peace
- 7 Two Emblematic Peacebuilding Initiatives in Antioquia
- 8 From Counterinsurgency to Peacebuilding
- 9 Transitional Justice in the Colombian Final Accord
- 10 The Comprehensive System of Truth, Justice, Reparation, and Non-Repetition
- 11 Una Tierra Inexplorada
- 12 Leading the Public to Peace
- 13 Securing the Peace and Promoting Human Rights in Post-Accord Colombia
- 14 Achieving an Unpopular Balance
- 15 Countering Violent Extremism through Narrative Intervention
- 16 Geographies of Truth in the Colombian Transitional Justice Process
- 17 Conclusion
- Index
- References
14 - Achieving an Unpopular Balance
Post-Conflict Justice and Amnesties in Comparative Perspective
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 July 2019
Book contents
- As War Ends
- As War Ends
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 The Complexity of the Organizational Design for Implementation of a Peace Accord
- 2 Violence, Grassroots Pressure, and Civil War Peace Processes
- 3 Land, Violence, and the Colombian Peace Process
- 4 Determinants of State Strength and Capacity
- 5 The Threat of Organized Crime in Post-Conflict Colombia
- 6 Violence after Peace
- 7 Two Emblematic Peacebuilding Initiatives in Antioquia
- 8 From Counterinsurgency to Peacebuilding
- 9 Transitional Justice in the Colombian Final Accord
- 10 The Comprehensive System of Truth, Justice, Reparation, and Non-Repetition
- 11 Una Tierra Inexplorada
- 12 Leading the Public to Peace
- 13 Securing the Peace and Promoting Human Rights in Post-Accord Colombia
- 14 Achieving an Unpopular Balance
- 15 Countering Violent Extremism through Narrative Intervention
- 16 Geographies of Truth in the Colombian Transitional Justice Process
- 17 Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
The Colombian Peace Accord1 is built upon a precarious balance between demands for accountability and the need for compromise between agents of violence. Of its major provisions, perhaps the one most disputed by the deal’s opponents is the Victims’ Agreement (Victimas). The fifth and final item to be agreed upon by government and FARC negotiators in December 2015, Victimas aims to establish The Comprehensive System of Truth, Justice, Reparation, and Non-repetition. This system includes five main planks: a truth commission, a special unit for missing persons, the Special Jurisdiction for Peace, a comprehensive reparations policy, and guarantees of non-recurrence.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- As War EndsWhat Colombia Can Tell Us About the Sustainability of Peace and Transitional Justice, pp. 324 - 345Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Adhikari, Prakash, and Hansen, Wendy L. (2013). “Reparations and Reconciliation in the Aftermath of Civil War.” Journal of Human Rights 12, 423–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akhavan, Payam. (1996). “The Yugoslav Tribunal at a Crossroads: The Dayton Peace Agreement and Beyond.” Human Rights Quarterly 18 (2), 259–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appel, Benjamin J. (2016). “In the Shadow of the International Criminal Court: Does the ICC Deter Human Rights Violations?” Journal of Conflict Resolution forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002716639101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backer, David, and Kulkarni, Anupma. (2012). “Investigating Post-Conflict Violence at the Micro-Level: Accounting for Patterns among Victims of Past Atrocities in Liberia.” Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
Baker, Pauline H. (2001). “Conflict Resolution versus Democratic Governance,” in Crocker, Chester A., Hampson, Fen Osler, and Aall, Pamela. 753–764. Turbulent Peace: The Challenges of Managing International Conflict. Washington, DC: USIP Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Christine. (2008). On the Law of Peace: Peace Agreements and the Lex Pacificatoria. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binningsbø, Helga Malmin, Loyle, Cyanne E., Gates, Scott, and Elster, Jon. (2012). “Armed Conflict and Post-Conflict Justice 1946–2006, a Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research 49 (5), 731–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, Jo-Marie, and Estrada, Paulo. (2017). “Guatemala Trials | International Justice Monitor.” October 11, 2017. www.ijmonitor.org/category/guatemala-trials/.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, Arjun, and Krebs, Ronald R. (2009). “Making and Mobilizing Moderates: Rhetorical Strategy, Political Networks, and Counterterrorism.” Security Studies 18, 371–399.Google Scholar
Correa, Christian. (2013). “Reparations in Peru: From Recommendations to Implementation.” New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. www.ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ_Report_Peru_Reparations_2013.pdf.Google Scholar
Cronin-Furman, Kate. (2013). “Managing Expectations: International Criminal Trials and the Prospects for Deterrence of Mass Atrocity.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 7 (3), 434–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancy, Geoff. (2017). “Searching for Deterrence at the International Criminal Court.” International Criminal Law Review 17 (4), 625–655. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123–01704007.Google Scholar
Dancy, Geoff. (2018). “Deals with the Devil? Conflict Amnesties, Civil War, and Sustainable Peace.” International Organization 72 (2), 387–421.Google Scholar
Dancy, Geoff, and Wiebelhaus-Brahm, Eric. (2018). “The Impact of Criminal Prosecutions During Intrastate Conflict.” Journal of Peace Research 55 (1), 7–61.Google Scholar
Freeman, Mark. (2009). Necessary Evils: Amnesties and the Search for Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hillebrecht, Courtney. (2016). “The Deterrent Effects of the International Criminal Court: Evidence from Libya.” International Interactions 42 (4), 616–643. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2016.1185713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iverson, Jens. (2013). “Transitional Justice, Jus Post Bellum and International Criminal Law: Differentiating the Usages, History and Dynamics.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 7 (3), 413–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jo, Hyeran. (2015). Compliant Rebels: Rebel Groups and International Law in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jo, Hyeran, and Simmons, Beth. (2016). “Can the International Criminal Court Deter Atrocity?” International Organization 70 (3), 443–475.Google Scholar
Kersten, Mark. (2016). Justice in Conflict: The Effects of the International Criminal Court’s Interventions on Ending Wars and Building Peace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keys, Barbara. (2010). “Congress, Kissinger, and the Origins of Human Rights Diplomacy.” Diplomatic History 34 (5), 823–851.Google Scholar
Kim, Hun Joon, and Sikkink, Kathryn. (2010). “Explaining the Deterrence Effect of Human Rights Prosecutions.” International Studies Quarterly 54 (4), 939–963.Google Scholar
Kreutz, Joakim. (2010). “How and When Armed Conflicts End: Introducing the UCDP Conflict Termination Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research 47 (2), 243–250.Google Scholar
Laplante, Lisa. (2009). “Outlawing Amnesty: The Return of Criminal Justice in Transitional Justice Schemes.” Virginia Journal of International Law 50 (1), 915–984.Google Scholar
Loyle, Cyanne, and Davenport, Christian. (2016). “Transitional Justice: Subverting Justice in Transition and Postconflict Societies.” Journal of Human Rights 15 (1), 126–149.Google Scholar
McGuinness, Margaret E. (2011). “Peace v. Justice: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Modern Origins of the Debate.” Diplomatic History 35 (5), 749–768.Google Scholar
Meernik, James D. (2016). International Tribunals and Human Security. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Millar, Gearoid. (2010). “Assessing Local Experiences of Truth-Telling in Sierra Leone: Getting to ‘Why’ through a Qualitative Case Study Analysis.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 4 (3), 477–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, Éadaoin, Engstrom, Par, and James, David. (2011). “In the Shadow of the ICC: Colombia and International Criminal Justice.” University of London: Human Rights Consortium. http://repository.essex.ac.uk/6101/.Google Scholar
OHCHR. (2009). “Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Amnesites.” Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.Google Scholar
Payne, Leigh A., Lessa, Francesca, and Pereira, Gabriel. (2015). “Overcoming Barriers to Justice in the Age of Human Rights Accountability.” Human Rights Quarterly 37 (3), 728–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pham, Phuong, Vinck, Patrick, Wierda, Marieke, Stover, Eric, and di Giovanni, Adrian. (2005). Forgotten Voices: A Population-Based Survey of Attitudes about Peace and Justice in Northern Uganda. Berkeley, CA: International Center for Transitional Justice. www.ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-HRC-Uganda-Voices-2005-English.pdf.Google Scholar
Popkin, Margaret. (2010). Peace without Justice: Obstacles to Building the Rule of Law in El Salvador. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Tonya. (2002). “Human Rights and Sustainable Peace,” in Stedman, Stephen John, Rothchild, Donald, and Cousens, Elizabeth M. (eds.) 237–272. Ending Civil Wars: The Implementation of Peace. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, Joanna R. (2016). “Transitional Justice,” in Goodhart, Michael (ed.) 389–404. Human Rights: Politics and Practice 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Republic of Uganda. (2000). The Amnesty Act, Available at https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl-nat.nsf/0/7d2430f8f3cc16b6c125767e00493668/$file/ugandan+amnesty+act+2000.pdf.Google Scholar
Samii, Cyrus. (2013). “Who Wants to Forgive and Forget? Transitional Justice Preferences in Postwar Burundi.” Journal of Peace Research 50 (2), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343312463713.Google Scholar
San Martín, María. (2017). “Thirty-Six Years Later, the Trial of the El Mozote Massacres Could Change El Salvador’s History.” OpenDemocracy. June 7, 2017. www.opendemocracy.net/democraciaabierta/luciana-t-llez-ch-vez/thirty-six-years-later-trial-of-el-mozote-massacres-could-ch.Google Scholar
Schabas, William A., and Darcy, Shane. eds. (2004). Truth Commissions and Courts: The Tension between Criminal Justice and the Search for Truth. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Scharf, Michael P. (2007). “Trading Justice for Peace: The Contemporary Law and Policy Debate,” in Hughes, Edel, Schabas, William A., and Thakur, Ramesh (eds.) 246–274. Atrocities and International Accountability: Beyond Transitional Justice. Tokyo, Japan: UN University Press.Google Scholar
Schipani, Andres. (2015). “Breakthrough in Farc Talks Triggers Backlash in Colombia.” Financial Times, September 24, 2015. www.ft.com/cms/s/0/dfc3505a-62d1-11e5-a28b-50226830d644.html#axzz3pnFlgzaA.Google Scholar
Shen-Bayh, Fiona. (2018). “Strategies of Repression: Judicial and Extrajudicial Methods of Autocratic Survival.” World Politics 70 (3), 321–357.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack, and Vinjamuri, Leslie. (2003). “Trials and Errors: Principle and Pragmatism in Strategies of International Justice.” International Security 28 (3), 5–44.Google Scholar
Stedman, Stephen John. (1997). “Spoiler Problems in Peace Processes.” International Security 22 (2), 5–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steflja, Izabela. (2018). “The Production of the War Criminal Cult: Radovan Karadžić and Vojislav Šešelj at The Hague.” Nationalities Papers 46 (1), 52–68.Google Scholar
Thoms, Oskar N. T., and Ron, James. (2007). “Do Human Rights Violations Cause Internal Conflict?” Human Rights Quarterly 29 (3), 674–705.Google Scholar
Transitional Justice Institute. (2013). The Belfast Guidelines on Amnesty and Accountability. University of Ulster.Google Scholar
UN Secretary General. (2004). “The Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies.” UN/S/2004/616. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Valencia, Roberto. (2016). “Official Data Suggests El Salvador Police Kill with Impunity.” October 7, 2016. www.insightcrime.org/news-analysis/official-data-suggests-el-salvador-police-kill-impunity.Google Scholar
Vinck, Patrick, Pham, Phuong, Baldo, Suliman, and Shigekane, Rachel. (2008). Living with Fear: A Population-Based Survey on Attitudes about Peace, Justice, and Social Reconstruction in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Berkeley, CA: International Center for Transitional Justice. www.ictj.org/publication/living-fear-population-based-survey-attitudes-about-peace-justice-and-social.Google Scholar
Waldorf, Lars. (2013). “Getting the Gunpowder Out of Their Heads: The Limits of Rights-Based DDR.” Human Rights Quarterly 35 (3), 701–719.Google Scholar
Walter, Barbara F. (2006). “Building Reputation: Why Governments Fight Some Separatists but Not Others.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (2), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540–5907.2006.00186.x.Google Scholar
Williams, Timothy, and Salehi, Mariam. (2016). “Beyond Peace vs. Justice: Assessing Transitional Justice’s Impact on Enduring Peace Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis.” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2748581. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2748581.Google Scholar