Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Applied Choice Analysis
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 68
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Buy the print book

Book description

The second edition of this popular book brings students fully up to date with the latest methods and techniques in choice analysis. Comprehensive yet accessible, it offers a unique introduction to anyone interested in understanding how to model and forecast the range of choices made by individuals and groups. In addition to a complete rewrite of several chapters, new topics covered include ordered choice, scaled MNL, generalized mixed logit, latent class models, group decision making, heuristics and attribute processing strategies, expected utility theory, and prospect theoretic applications. Many additional case studies are used to illustrate the applications of choice analysis with extensive command syntax provided for all Nlogit applications and datasets available online. With its unique blend of theory, estimation, and application, this book has broad appeal to all those interested in choice modeling methods and will be a valuable resource for students as well as researchers, professionals, and consultants.

Reviews

'This is an enormous book, covering in extraordinary detail all the topics selected by these respected authors. It represents a substantial update and renewal of the material covered in the first edition. In my opinion it should be on the shelves of anyone dealing with discrete choice models.'

Juan de Dios Ortúzar Salas - Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

'Choice modelling is a very active and rapidly evolving field, with applications across numerous disciplines. The first edition of Applied Choice Analysis accomplished the major task of making the breadth of work accessible to a wide audience, with hands on examples provided throughout. Nine years on, the field has developed further, and David A. Hensher, John M. Rose and William H. Greene have again performed a remarkable job in explaining these new methods without unnecessary jargon and complexity, helping to educate the next generation of choice modellers and striking exactly the right balance between theory and practice.'

Stephane Hess - University of Leeds

'The new edition of this already very popular book provides substantial added value to readers. Applied choice analysis has now been extended to include all recent developments. More intuition and further clarifications have been added. The examples provided cover thoroughly the range of case study applications. This book will work perfectly as a step-by-step introduction for the neophite as well as a core reference for the practitioner. The authors have managed to strike the right balance between practicality and accuracy, without subtracting much of the econometric details.'

Riccardo Scarpa - Gibson Chair for MayFood, Rural and Environmental Economics, Queens University Belfast

'I cannot imagine a better introduction to choice modeling. The authors manage to bring a vivid, storytelling voice to this complex topic, with language that has personality and rhythm. The various interrelated concepts and procedures that constitute choice modeling come across as simple and straightforward. An amazing feat. The ins-and-outs of a computer code are also taught along with the statistical methods. This integration of computer language within the text is unusual and highly valuable, giving readers all the steps that are needed to implement the methods on their own data.'

Kenneth Train - Adjunct Professor, University of California, Berkeley

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents


Page 1 of 2



Page 1 of 2


References
Aadland, D. and Caplan, A. J. (2003) Willingness to pay for curbside recycling with detection and mitigation of hypothetical bias, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85 (3), 492–502.
Accent Marketing and Research and Centre for Research in Environmental Appraisal & Management (CREAM) (2002) Yorkshire Water Services, Final Report, Prepared for Yorkshire Water, November.
ACT Gover (2003a) Community Summit, Workbook, 27 August, Canberra.
ACT Gover (2003b) Community Water Summit, Workshop Groups’ Summary Reports, 27 August, Canberra. Available at: .
ACTEW Corporation (2004) Community assistance makes water restrictions a success, Media Release, 8 June.
Adamowicz, W., Hanemann, M., Swait, J., Johnson, R., Layton, D., Regenwetter, M., Reimer, T. and Sorkin, R. (2005) Decision strategy and structure in households: a groups perspective, Marketing Letters, 16, 387–399.
Ailawadi, K. L., Gedenk, K. and Neslin, S. A. (1999) Heterogeneity and purchase event feedback in choice models: an empirical analysis with implications for model buildings, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 16, 177–198.
Akaike, H. (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19 (6), 716–723.
Alfnes, F. and Steine, G. (2005) None-of-these bias in hypothetical choice experiments, Discussion Paper DP-06/05, Department of Economics and Resources Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Aas.
Alfnes, F., Guttormsen, A., Steine, G. and Kolstad, K. (2006) Consumers’ willingness to pay for the color of salmon: a choice experiment with real economic incentives, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88 (4), 1050–1061.
Allais, M. (1953) Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque, Econometrica, 21 (4), 503–546.
Allenby, G. M., Shively, T. S., Yang, S. and Garratt, M. J. (2004) A choice model for packaged goods: dealing with discrete quantities and quantity discounts, Marketing Science, 23 (1), 95–108.
Allison, P. (1999) Comparing logit and probit coefficients across groups, Sociological Methods and Research, 28, 186–208.
Anderson, D. A. and Wiley, J. B. (1992) Efficient choice set designs for estimating cross effect models, Marketing Letters, 3, 357–370.
Anderson, S., Harrison, G. W., Hole, A. R., Lau, M. and Rutström, E. E. (2012) Non-linear mixed logit, Journal of Theory and Decision, 73, 7–96.
Anderson, S., Harrison, G. W., Lau, M. and Rutström, E. (2007a) Valuation using multiple price list formats, Applied Economics, 39 (4), 675–682.
Anderson, S., Harrison, G. W., Lau, M. and Rutström, E. (2007b) Dual criteria decisions, Working Paper 06–11, Department of Economics, College of Business Administration, University of Central Florida.
Antonov, I. A. and Saleev, V. M. (1979) An economic method of computing LPtau sequences, Zh, vychisl. Mat. mat. Fiz., 19, 243–245, English translation, USSR Comput. Maths. Math. Phys., 19, 252–256.
Arendt, J. and Holm, A. (2007) Probit models with binary endogenous regressors, 6th International Health Economics Association World Congress, Copenhagen, 8–11 July.
Arentze, T., Borgers, A., Timmermans, H. and DelMistro, R. (2003) Transport stated choice responses: effects of task complexity, presentation format and literacy, Transportation Research Part E, 39, 229–244.
Aribarg, A., Arora, N. and Bodur, H. O. (2002) Understanding the role of preference revision and concession in group decisions, Journal of Marketing Research, 39, 336–349.
Armstrong, P. M., Garrido, R. A. and Ortúzar, J. de D. (2001) Confidence intervals to bound the value of time, Transportation Research Part E, 7 (1), 143–161.
Arora, N. and Allenby, G. M. (1999) Measuring the influence of individual preference structures in group decision making, Journal of Marketing Research, 37, 476–487.
Asensio, J. and Matas, A. (2008) Commuters’ valuation of travel time variability, Transportation Research Part E, 44 (6), 1074–1085.
Ashok, K., Dillon, W. R. and Yuan, S. (2002) Extending discrete choice models to incorporate attitudinal and other latent variables, Journal of Marketing Research, 39 (1), 31–46.
Ashton, W. D. (1972) The logit transformation, Griffin, London. Available at: .
Asmussen, S. and Glynn, P. W. (2007) Stochastic Simulation: Algorithms and Analysis, Springer, New York.
Auger, P., Devinney, T. M. and Louviere, J. J. (2007) Best–worst scaling methodology to investigate consumer ethical beliefs across countries, Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 299–326.
Backhaus, K., Wilken, R., Voeth, M. and Sichtmann, C. (2005) An empirical comparison of methods to measure willingness to pay by examining the hypothetical bias, International Journal of Market Research 47 (5), 543–562.
Balcombe, K., Fraser, I. and Chalak, A. (2009) Model selection in the Bayesian mixed logit: misreporting or heterogeneous preferences?, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 57 (2), 219–225.
Bateman, I. J., Carson, R. T., Day, B., Dupont, D., Louviere, J. J., Morimoto, S., Scarpa, R. et al. (2008) Choice set awareness and ordering effects in discrete choice experiments, CSERGE Working Paper EDM 08-01.
Bateman, I. J., Carson, R. T., Day, B., Dupont, D., Louviere, J. J., Morimoto, S., Scarpa, R. and Wang, P. (2008) Choice set awareness and ordering effects in discrete choice experiments, CSERGE Working Paper EDM 08–01.
Bateman, I. J. and Munro, A. (2005) An experiment on risky choice amongst households, Economic Journal, 115, 176–189.
Bates, J., Polak, J., Jones, P. and Cook, A. (2001) The valuation of reliability for personal travel, Transportation Research Part E, 37 (2–3), 191–229.
Batley, R. and Ibáñez, N. (2009) Randomness in preferences, outcomes and tastes: an application to journey time risk, International Choice Modelling Conference, Harrogate.
Beck, M., Rose, J. M. and Hensher, D. A. (2012) Comparison of group decision making models: a vehicle purchasing case study, Paper presented at the International Association of Traveller Behaviour Research (IATBR) Conference, Toronto, July 13–15.
Beck, M., Rose, J. M. and Hensher, D. A. (2013) Consistently inconsistent: the role of certainty, acceptability and scale in automobile choice, Transportation Research Part E, 56 (3), 81–93.
Becker, G. (1991) A Treatise on the Family, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Becker, G. (1993) A theory of marriage: Part 1, Journal of Political Economy, 81 (4), 813–846.
Beharry, N., Hensher, D. and Scarpa, R. (2009) An analytical framework for joint vs. separate decisions by couples in choice experiments: the case of coastal water quality in Tobago, Environmental and Resource Economics, 43, 95–117.
Beharry, N. and Scarpa, R. (2008) Who should select the attributes in choice-experiments for non-market valuation? An application to coastal water quality in Tobago, Sustainability Research Institute, University of Leeds.
Ben-Akiva, M. E. and Bolduc, D. (1996) Multinomial probit with a logit kernel and a general parametric specification of the covariance structure, Unpublished Working Paper, Department of Civil Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Ben-Akiva, M. E., Bolduc, D. and Bradley, M. (1993) Estimation of travel choice models with randomly distributed values of time, Transportation Research Record, 1413, 88–97.
Ben-Akiva, M. E., Bradley, M., Morikawa, T., Benjamin, J., Novak, T. P., Oppewal, H. and Rao, V. (1994) Combining revealed and stated preferences data, Marketing Letters, 5 (4), 336–350.
Ben Akiva, M. E. and Lerman, S. R. (1979) Disaggregate travel and mobility choice models and measures of accessibility, in Hensher, D. A. and Stopher, P. R. (eds.), Behavioural Travel Modelling, Croom Helm, London.
Ben Akiva, M. E. and Lerman, S. R. (1985) Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Ben-Akiva, M., McFadden, D., Abe, M., BoÈckenholt, U., Bolduc, D., Gopinath, D., Morikawa, T., Ramaswamy, V., Rao, V., Revelt, D. and Steinberg, D. (1997). Modelling methods for discrete choice analysis, Marketing Letters 8 (3), 273–286.
Ben-Akiva, M., McFadden, D., Garling, T., Gopinath, D., Walker, J., Bolduc, D., Boersch-Supan, A., Delquié, P., Larichev, O., Morikawa, T., Polydoropoulou, A. and Rao, V. (1999). Extended framework for modelling choice behavior, Marketing Letters, 10 (3), 187–203.
Ben-Akiva, M., McFadden, D., Train, K., Walker, J., Bhat, C., Bierlaire, M., Bolduc, D., Boersch-Supan, A., Brownstone, D., Bunch, D., Daly, A., de Palma, A., Gopinath, D., Karlstrom, A. and Munizaga, M. A. (2002) Hybrid choice models: progress and challenges, Marketing Letters, 13 (3), 163–175.
Ben-Akiva, M. E. and Morikawa, T. (1991) Estimation of travel demand models from multiple data sources, in Koshi, M. (ed.), Transportation and Traffic Theory, Proceedings of the 11th ISTTT, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 461–476.
Ben-Akiva, M. E., Morikawa, T. and Shiroishi, F. (1991) Analysis of the reliability of preference ranking data, Journal of Business Research, 23, 253–268.
Ben-Akiva, M. E., and Swait, J. (1986) The Akaike likelihood ratio index, Transportation Science, 20 (2), 133–136.
Bentham, J. (1789) An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Berkson, J. (1944) Application of the logistics function to bioassay, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 39, 357–65.
Bernouli, D. (1738) Specimen Theoriae Novae de Mensura Sortis, Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae, Tomus V (Papers of the Imperial Academy of Sciences in Petersburg), V, 175–192.
Berry, S., Levinsohn, J. and Pakes, A. (1995) Automobile prices in market equilibrium, Econometrica, 63 (4), 841–890.
Bertrand, M. and Mullainathan, S. (2001) Do people mean what they say? Implications for subjective survey data, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 91(2), 67–72.
Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F. and Payne, J. W. (1998). Constructive consumer choice processes, Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 187–217.
Bhat, C. R. (1994) Imputing a continuous income variable from grouped and missing income observations, Economics Letters, 46 (4), 311–320.
Bhat, C. R. (1995) A heteroscedastic extreme value model of intercity travel mode choice, Transportation Research Part B, 29 (6), 471–483.
Bhat, C. R. (1997) An endogenous segmentation mode choice model with an application to intercity travel, Transportation Science, 31, 34–48.
Bhat, C. R. (2001) Quasi-random maximum simulated likelihood estimation of the mixed multinomial logit model, Transportation Research Part B, 35 (7), 677–693.
Bhat, C. R. (2003) Simulation estimation of mixed discrete choice models using randomized and scrambled Halton sequences, Transportation Research Part B, 37 (9), 837–855.
Bhat, C. R. (2008) The multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (MDCEV) model: role of utility function parameters, identification considerations, and model extensions, Transportation Research Part B, 42 (3), 274–303.
Bhat, C. R. and Castelar, S. (2002) A unified mixed logit framework for modeling revealed and stated preferences: formulation and application to congestion pricing analysis in the San Francisco Bay area, Transportation Research Part B, 36, 577–669.
Bhat, C. R. and Pulugurta, V. (1998) A comparison of two alternative behavioral mechanisms for car ownership decisions, Transportation Research Part B, 32 (1), 61–75.
Bhat, C. R. and Zhao, H. (2002) The spatial analysis of activity stop generation, Transportation Research Part B, 36 (6), 557–575.
Bickel, P. J. and Doksum, K. A. (1981) An analysis of transformations revisited, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 296–311.
Blackburn, M., Harrison, G. W. and Rutström, E. E. (1994) Statistical bias functions and informative hypothetical surveys, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76 (5), 1084–1088.
Blanchard, O. and Fischer, S. (1989) Lectures on Macroeconomics, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Bliemer, M. C. J. and Rose, J. M. (2005a) Efficiency and sample size requirements for stated choice studies, Working Paper ITLS-WP-05-08, Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies, The University of Sydney.
Bliemer, M. C. J. and Rose, J. M. (2005b) Efficient designs for alternative specific choice experiments, Working Paper ITLS-WP-05-04, Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies, the University of Sydney.
Bliemer, M. C. J. and Rose, J. M. (2009) Designing stated choice experiments: the state of the art, in Kitamura, R., Yoshi, T. and Yamamoto, T. (eds.), The Expanding Sphere of Travel Behaviour Research, Selected Papers from the 11th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Chapter 25, 495–538.
Bliemer, M. C. J. and Rose, J. M. (2010a) Construction of experimental designs for mixed logit models allowing for correlation across choice observations, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 44 (6) 720–34.
Bliemer, M. C. J. and Rose, J. M. (2010b) Construction of experimental designs for mixed logit models allowing for correlation across choice observations, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 44 (6) 720–34.
Bliemer, M. C. J. and Rose, J. M. (2010c) Serial choice conjoint analysis for estimating discrete choice models, in Hess, S. and Daly, A. (eds.), Choice Modelling: The State of the Art and the State of the Practice, Emerald Group, Bingley, 139–161.
Bliemer, M. C. J. and Rose, J. M. (2011) Experimental design influences on stated choice outputs: an empirical study in air travel choice, Transportation Research Part A, 45 (1), 63–79.
Bliemer, M. C. J. and Rose, J. M. (2013) Confidence intervals of willingness-to-pay for random coefficient logit models, Transportation Research Part B, 58 (2), 199–214.
Bliemer, M. C. J. and Rose, J. M. (2014) A unified theory of experimental design for stated choice studies, Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Transport Survey Methods, Leura.
Bliemer, M. C. J., Rose, J. M. and Hensher, D. A. (2009) Efficient stated choice experiments for estimating nested logit models, Transportation Research Part B, 43 (1), 19–35.
Bliemer, M. C. J., Rose, J. M. and Hess, S. (2008) Approximation of Bayesian efficiency in experimental choice designs, Journal of Choice Modelling, 1 (1), 98–127.
Blumenschein, K., Johanneson, M., Yokoyama, K. K. and Freeman, P. R. (2001) Hypothetical versus real willingness to pay in the health care sector: results from a field experiment, Journal of Health Economics, 20 (3), 441–457.
Blumenschein, K., Johannesson, M., Blomquist, G. C., Liljas, B. and O’Coner, R. M. (1998) Experimental results on expressed certainty and hypothetical bias in contingent valuation, Southern Economic Journal, 65 (1), 169–177.
Bock, R. D. and Jones, L. V. (1968) The Measurement and Prediction of Judgment and Choice, Holden-Day, San Francisco, CA.
Bock, R. D. and Jones, L. V. (2004) Income and happiness: new results from generalized threshold and sequential models, IZA Discussion Paper 1175, SOI Working Paper 0407.
Boes, S. and Winkelman, R. (2007) Ordered response models, Allgemeines Statistiches Archiv Physica Verlag, 90 (1), 165–180.
Bolduc, D. and Alvarez Daziano, R. (2010) On estimation of hybrid choice models, in Hess, S. and Daly, A. (eds.), Choice Modelling: The State of the Art and the State of Practice, Emerald Group, Bingley.
Bolduc, D., Ben-Akiva, M., Walker, J. and Michaud, A. (2005) Hybrid choice models with logit kernel: applicability to large scale models, in Lee-Gosselin, M. and Doherty, S. (eds), Integrated Land-Use and Transportation Models: Behavioural Foundations, Elsevier, Oxford, 275–302.
Bonini, N., Tentori, K. and Rumiati, R. (2004) Contingent application of the cancellation editing operation: the role of semantic relatedness between risky outcomes, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17, 139–152.
Bordley, R. (2013) Discrete choice with large choice sets, Economics Letters, 118, 13–15.
Borsh-Supan, A. and Hajivassiliou, V. (1993) Smooth unbiased multivariate probability simulation for maximum likelihood estimation of limited dependent variable models, Journal of Econometrics, 58 (3), 347–368.
Box, G. E. P. and Cox, D. R. (1964) An analysis of transformations, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 26, 211–252.
Box, G. E. P. and Draper, N. R. (1987) Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces, Wiley, New York.
Bradley, M. A. (2006) Process data for understanding and modelling travel behaviour, in Stopher, P. and Stecher, C. (eds.), Travel Survey Methods: Quality and Future Directions, Elsevier, Oxford.
Bradley, M. A., and Daly, A. J. (1997) Estimation of logit choice models using mixed stated preference and revealed preference information, in Stopher, P. R. and Lee-Gosselin, M. (eds.), Understanding Travel Behaviour in an Era of Change, Pergamon, Oxford, 209–232.
Bradley, R. A. and Terry, M. E. (1952) Rank analysis of incomplete block designs. I: the method of paired comparison, Biometrika, 39, 324–345.
Brant, R. (1990) Assessing proportionality in the proportional odds model for ordinal logistic regression, Biometrics, 46, 1171–1178.
Bratley, P., Fox, B. L. and Niederreiter, H. (1992) Implementing Sobol’s quasi-random sequence generator, ACM Transactions on Computer Software, 2 (3), 195–213.
Breffle, W. S. and Morey, E. R. (2000) Investigating preference heterogeneity in a repeated discrete-choice recreation demand model of Atlantic salmon fishing, Marine Resource Economics, 15, 1–20.
Brewer, A. and Hensher, D. A. (2000) Distributed work and travel behaviour: the dynamics of interactive agency choices between employers and employees, Transportation, 27, 117–148.
Brewer, C., Kovner, C. T., Wu, Y., Greene, W., Liu, Y. and Reimers, C. (2006) Factors influencing female registered nurses’ work behavior, Health Services Research, 43 (1), 860–866.
Briesch, R. A., Chintagunta, P. K. and Matzkin, R. L. (2010) Nonparametric discrete choice models with unobserved heterogeneity, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 28 (2), 291–307.
Briesch, R. A., Krishnamurthi, L., Mazumdar, T. and Raj, S. P. (1997) A comparative analysis of reference price models, Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 202–214.
Brown, T. C., Ajzen, I. and Hrubes, D. (2003) Further tests of entreaties to avoid hypothetical bias in referendum contingent valuation, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46 (2), 353–361.
Browning, M. and Chiappori, P. A. (1998) Efficient intra-household allocations: a general characterization and empirical tests, Econometrica, 66 (6), 1241–78.
Brownstone, D. and Small, K. A. (2005) Valuing time and reliability: assessing the evidence from road pricing demonstrations, Transportation Research Part A, 39 (4), 279–293.
Brownstone, D. and Train, K. (1999) Forecasting new product penetration with flexible substitution patterns, Journal of Econometrics, 89 (1–2), 109–129.
Bunch, D. S., Louviere, J. J. and Anderson, D. A. (1996) A comparison of experimental design strategies for multinomial logit models: the case of generic attributes, Working Paper, Graduate School of Management, University of California at Davis.
Burgess, G., Burgess, H., Burton, L., Howe, C. W., Johnson, L., MacDonnell, L. J. and Reitsma, R. F. (1992) Improving the environmental problem-solving process: lessons from the 1980s California drought, Working Paper, University of Colorado.
Burgess, L. and Street, D. (2003) Optimal designs for 2k choice experiments, Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods, 32 (11), 2185–2206.
Burgess, L. and Street, D. (2005) Optimal designs for choice experiments with asymmetric attributes, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 134 (1), 288–301.
Burnett, N. (1997) Gender economics courses in Liberal Arts Colleges, Journal of Economic Education, 28 (4), 369–377.
Cai, Y., Deilami, I. and Train, K. (1998) Customer retention in a competitive power market: analysis of a ‘double-bounded plus follow-ups’ questionnaire, Energy Journal, 19 (2), 191–215.
Caflisch, R. E. (1998) Monte Carlo and quasi-Monte Carlo methods, Acta Numerica, 7, 1–49.
Camerer, C. and Ho, T. (1994) Violations of the betweenness axiom and non-linearity in probability, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 8 (2), 167–196.
Cameron, A. and Trivedi, P. (2005) Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications, Cambridge University Press.
Cameron, S. V. and Heckman, J. J. (1998) Life cycle schooling and dynamic selection bias: models and evidence for five cohorts of American males, Journal of Political Economy, 106 (2), 262–333.
Cameron, T. A. and DeShazo, J. R. (2010) Differential attention to attributes in utility-theoretic choice models, Journal of Choice Modelling, 3 (3), 73–115.
Cameron, T. A., Poe, G. L., Ethier, R. G. and Schulze, W. D. (2002) Alternative non-market value-elicitation methods: are the underlying preferences the same?, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44 (3), 391–425.
Campbell, D., Hensher, D. A. and Scarpa, R. (2011) Non-attendance to attributes in environmental choice analysis: a latent class specification, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54 (8), 1061–1076.
Campbell, D., Hensher, D. A. and Scarpa, R. (2012) Cost thresholds, cut-offs and sensitivities in stated choice analysis: identification and implications, Resource and Energy Economics, 34, 396–411.
Campbell, D., Hutchinson, W. and Scarpa, R. (2008) Incorporating discontinuous preferences into the analysis of discrete choice experiments, Environment and Resource Economics, 43 (1), 403–417.
Cantillo, V., Heydecker, B. and Ortúzar, J. de D. (2006) A discrete choice model incorporating thresholds for perception in attribute values, Transportation Research Part B, 40 (9), 807–825.
Cantillo, V. and Ortúzar, J. de D. (2005) A semi-compensatory discrete choice model with explicit attribute thresholds of perception, Transportation Research Part B, 39 (7), 641–657.
Carlsson, F and Martinsson, P. (2001) Do hypothetical and actual marginal willingness to pay differ in choice experiments?, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 41 (2), 179–192.
Carlsson, F and Martinsson, P. (2002) Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economics, Health Economics, 12, 281–294.
Carlsson, F., Frykblom, P. and Lagerkvist, C-J. (2005) Using cheap-talk as a test of validity of choice experiments, Economics Letters, 89 (5), 147–152.
Carlsson, F., Kataria, M. and Lampi, E. (2008) Ignoring attributes in choice experiments, Proceedings of the EAERE Conference, 25–28 June, Gothenburg.
Carp, F. M. (1974) Position effects on interview responses, Journal of Gerontology, 29 (5), 581–587.
Carrasco, J. A. and Ortúzar, J. de D. (2002) A review and assessment of the nested logit model, Transport Reviews, 22, 197–218.
Carroll, J. S. and Johnson, E. J. (1990). Decision Research: A Field Guide, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Carson, R., Flores, E., Martin, K. and Wright, J. (1996) Contingent valuation and revealed preference methodologies: comparing the estimates for quasi-public goods, Land Economics, 72 (1), 80–99.
Carson, R., Groves, T., List, J. and Machina, M. (2004) Probabilistic influence and supplemental benefits: a field test of the two key assumptions underlying stated preferences, Paper presented at the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, Budapest, June.
Carson, R., Groves, T. and Machina, M. (2007) Incentive and informational properties of preference questions, Environment and Resource Economics, 37, 181–210.
Carson, R., Louviere, J. J., Anderson, D., Arabie, P., Bunch, D., Hensher, D. A., Johnson, R., Kuhfeld, W., Steinberg, D., Swait, J., Timmermans, H. and Wiley, J. (1994) Experimental analysis of choice, Marketing Letters, 5, 351–367.
Cassel, E. and Mendelsohn, R. (1985) The choice of functional forms for hedonic price equations: comment, Journal of Urban Economics, 18 (2), 135–142.
Caussade, S., Ortúzar, J. de D., Rizzi, L. and Hensher, D. A. (2005) Assessing the influence of design dimensions on stated choice experiment estimates, Transportation Research Part B, 39 (7), 621–640.
Chamberlain, G. (1980) Analysis of covariance with qualitative data, Review of Economic Studies, 47, 225–238.
Cherchi, E., Meloni, I. and Ortúzar, J. de D. (2002) Policy forecasts involving new train services: application of mixed rp/sp models with interaction effects, Paper presented at the XII Panamerican Conference on Transport and Traffic Engineering, Quito.
Chiuri, M. C. (2000) Individual decisions and household demand for consumption and leisure, Research in Economics, 54, 277–324.
Choice Metrics (2012) NGene 1.1.1 User Manual and Reference Guide, Choice Metrics, Sydney.
Chorus, C. G. (2010) A new model of random regret minimization, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 10, 181–196.
Chorus, C. G., Arentze, T. A. and Timmermans, H. J. P. (2008a) A random regret-minimization model of travel choice, Transportation Research Part B, 42 (1), 1–18.
Chorus, C. G., Arentze, T. A. and Timmermans, H. J. P. (2008b) A comparison of regret minimization and utility-maximization in the context of travel mode-choices, Proceedings of the 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Cirillo, C., Lindveld, K. and Daly, A. (2000) Eliminating bias due to the repeated measurements problem in SP data, in Ortúzar, J. de D. (ed.), Stated Preference Modelling Techniques: PTRC Perspectives 4, PTRC Education and Research Services Ltd, London.
Cohen, E. (2009) Applying best–worst scaling to wine marketing, International Journal of Wine Business Research, 21 (1), 8–23.
Collins, A. T. and Rose, J. M. (2011) Estimation of stochastic scale with best–worst data, Manuscript, Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies, University of Sydney Business School, 2nd International Choice Modelling Conference ICMC 2011, University of Leeds, 6 July.
Collins, A. T., Rose, J. M. and Hensher, D. A. (2013) Specification issues in a generalised random parameters attribute nonattendance model, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 56, 234–53.
Connolly, T. and Zeelenberg, M. (2002) Regret in decision making, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 212–216.
Cook, R. D. and Nachtsheim, C. J. (1980) A comparison of algorithms for constructing exact D-optimal designs, Techometrics, 22, 315–324.
Cooper, B., Rose, J. M. and Crase, L. (2012) Does anybody like water restrictions? Some observations in Australian urban communities, Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 56 (1), 61–51.
Corfman, K. P. (1991) Perceptions of relative influence: formation and measurement, Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 125–136.
Corfman, K. P. and Lehmann, D. R. (1987) Models of cooperative group decision-making and relative influence, Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 1–13.
Coricelli, G., Critchley, H. D., Joffily, M., O’Doherty, J. P., Sirigu, A. and Dolan, R. J. (2005) Regret and its avoidance: a neuroimaging study of choice behaviour, Nature Neuroscience, 8 (9), 1255–1262.
Creel, M. D. and Loomis, J. B. (1991) Confidence intervals for welfare measures with an application to a problem of truncated counts, Review of Economics and Statistics, 73, 370–373.
Cummings, R. G., Harrison, G. W. and Osborne, L. L. (1995) Can the bias of contingent valuation be reduced? Evidence from the laboratory, Economics Working Paper B-95-03, Division of Research, College of Business Administration, University of South Carolina. Available at: .
Cummings, R. G., Harrison, G. W. and Rutström, E. E. (1995) Homegrown values and hypothetical surveys: is the dichotomous choice approach incentive compatible?, American Economic Review, 85 (1), 260–266.
Cummings, R. G. and Taylor, L. O. (1998) Does realism matter in contingent valuation surveys?, Land Economics, 74 (2), 203–215.
Cummings, R. G. and Taylor, L. O. (1999) Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: a cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method, American Economic Review, 89 (3), 649–665.
Cunha, F., Heckman, J. J. and Navarro, S. (2007) The identification and economic content of ordered choice models with stochastic cutoffs, International Economic Review, 48 (4), 1273–1309.
Daly, A. J. (1987) Estimating ‘tree’ logit models, Transportation Research Part B, 21, 251–67.
Daly, A. J., Hess, S. and Train, K. (2012) Assuring finite moments for willingness to pay in random coefficient models, Transportation, 39 (1), 19–31.
Daly, A. J., Hess, S., Patruni, B., Potoglou, D. et al. (2013) Using ordered attitudinal indicators in a latent variable choice model: a study of the impact of security on rail travel behaviour, Transportation, 39 (2), 267–297.
Daly, A. J. and Ortúzar, J. de D. (1990) Forecasting and data aggregation: theory and practice, Traffic Engineering & Control, 31, 632–643.
Daly, A. J. and Zachary, S. (1978) Improved multiple choice models, in Hensher, D. A. and Dalvi, M. Q. (eds.), Determinants of Travel Choice, Saxon House, Farnborough.
Day, B., Bateman, I. J., Carson, R. T., Dupont, D., Louviere, J. J., Morimoto, S., Scarpa, R. et al. (2009) Task independence in stated preference studies: a test of order effect explanations, CSERGE Working Paper EDM 09–14.
Day, B. and Prades, J. P. (2010) Ordering anomalies in choice experiments, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 59, 271–285.
Daykin, A. and Moffitt, P. (2002) Analyzing ordered responses: a review of the ordered probit model, Understanding Statistics, 3, 157–166.
Daziano, R. and Bolduc, D. (2012) Covariance, identification, and finite sample performance of the MSL and Bayes estimators of a logit model with latent attributes, Transportation, 40 (3), 647–670.
Debreu, G. (1960) Review of Luce, R. D., Individual Choice Behavior, American Economic Review, 50, 186–188.
Dellaert, B. G. C., Prodigalidad, M. and Louviere, J. J. (1998) Family members’ projections of each other’s preference and influence: a two-stage conjoint approach, Marketing Letters, 9, 135–145.
Dempster, A. P. (1967) Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multiple-valued mapping, Ann Math. Stat., 38, 325–339.
DeShazo, J. R. (2002) Designing transactions without framing effects in iterative question formats, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 43, 360–385.
DeShazo, J. R. and Fermo, G. (2002) Designing choice sets for stated preference methods: the effects of complexity on choice consistency, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44, 123–143.
Diamond, P. and Hausman, J. (1994) Contingent valuation: is some number better than no number?, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(4), 45–64.
Diecidue, E. and Wakker, P. P. (2001) On the intuition of rank-dependent utility, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 23 (3), 281–298.
Diederich, A. (2003) MDFT account of decision making under time pressure, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10 (1), 156–166.
Ding, M., Grewal, R. and Liechty, J. (2007) An incentive-aligned mechanism for conjoint analysis, Journal of Marketing Research, 44 (2), 214–223, .
Domencich, T. and McFadden, D. (1975) Urban Travel Demand, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Dosman, D. and Adamowicz, W (2006) Combining stated and revealed preference data to construct an empirical examination of intrahousehold bargaining, Review of Economics of the Household, 4, 15–34.
Drolet, A. and Luce, M. F. (2004) The rationalizing effects of cognitive load on emotion-based trade-off avoidance, Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (1), 63–77.
Dubois, D. and Prade, H. (1987) Representation and combination of uncertainty with belief functions and possibility measures, Computational Intelligence, 170 (11), 909–924.
Dubois, D. and Prade, H. (1988) Modelling uncertainty and inductive inference: a survey of recent non-additive probability systems, Acta Psychologica, 68, 53–78.
Dworkin, J. (1973) Global trends in natural disasters 1947–1973, Natural Hazards Research Working Paper 26, Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.
Einstein, A. (1921) Geometry and experience, Lecture at the Prussian Academy of Science, Berlin, 27 January.
El Helbawy, A. T. and Bradley, R. A. (1978) Treatment contrasts in paired comparisons: large-sample results, applications and some optimal designs, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73, 831–839.
Eliasson, J., Hultzkranz, L., Nerhagen, L. and Smidfelt Rosqvist, L. (2009) The Stockholm congestion charging trial 2006: overview of effects, Transportation Research Part A, 43 (3), 240–250.
Eliasson, J. and Mattsson, L. G. (2006) Equity effects of congestion pricing: quantitative methodology and a case study for Stockholm, Transportation Research Part A, 40 (7), 602–620.
Ellsberg, D. (1961) Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75 (4), 643–669.
Elrod, T. (1988) Choice map: inferring a product-market map from panel data, Marketing Science, 7 (1), 21–40.
Elrod, T. and Keane, M. P. (1995) A factor-analytic probit model for representing the market structure in panel data, Journal of Marketing Research, 32 (1), 1–16.
Eluru, N., Bhat, C. R. and Hensher, D. A. (2008) A mixed generalized ordered response model for examining pedestrian and bicyclist injury severity level in traffic crashes, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40 (3), 1033–1054.
Ericsson, K. A. and Simon, H. A. (1993) Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Eto, J., Koomey, J., Lehman, B., Martin, N., Mills, E., Webber, C. and Worrell, E. (2001) Scoping study on trends in the economic value of electricity reliability to the US economy, Technical Report, Energy Analysis Department, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA.
Everitt, B. (1988) A finite mixture model for the clustering of mixed-mode data, Statistics and Probability Letters, 6, 305–309.
Fader, P. S., Lattin, J. M. and Little, J. D. C. (1992) Estimating nonlinear parameters in the multinomial logit model, Marketing Science, 11 (4), 372–385.
Fang, K.-T. and Wang, Y. (1994) Number-Theoretic Methods in Statistics, Chapman & Hall, London.
Ferrini, S. and Scarpa, R. (2007) Designs with a-priori information for nonmarket valuation with choice-experiments: a Monte Carlo study, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 53 (3), 342–363.
Fiebig, D. G., Keane, M., Louviere, J. J. and Wasi, N. (2010) The generalized multinomial logit: accounting for scale and coefficient heterogeneity, Marketing Science, 29 (3), 393–421.
Fisher, R. A. (1935) The Design of Experiments, Hafner Press, New York.
Flynn, T. N., Louviere, J. J., Peters, T. J. and Coast, J. (2007) Best–worst scaling: what it can do for health care research and how to do it, Journal of Health Economics, 26, 171–189.
Flynn, T. N., Louviere, J. J., Peters, T. J. and Coast, J. (2008) Estimating preferences for a dermatology consultation using best–worst scaling: comparison of various methods of analysis, BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8 (76), 1–12.
Fosgerau, M. (2006) Investigating the distribution of the value of travel time savings, Transportation Research Part B, 40 (8), 688–707.
Fosgerau, M. (2007) Using nonparametrics to specify a model to measure the value of travel time, Transportation Research Part A, 41 (9), 842–856.
Fosgerau, M. and Bierlaire, M. (2009) Discrete choice models with multiplicative error terms, Transportation Research, Part B: Methodological, 43 (5), 494–505.
Foster, V., Bateman, I. and Harley, D. (1997) Real and hypothetical willingness to pay for environmental preservation: a non-experimental comparison, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 48 (1), 123–138.
Fowkes, A. S. and Wardman, M. R. (1988) The design of stated preference travel choice experiments with particular regard to inter-personal taste variations, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 22, 27–44.
Fowkes, A. S., Wardman, M. and Holden, D. G. P. (1993) Non-orthogonal stated preference design, Proceedings of the PTRC Summer Annual Meeting, 91–97.
Fox, C. R. and Poldrack, R. A. (2008) Prospect theory and the brain, in Glimcher, P., Fehr, E., Camerer, C. and Poldrack, R. (eds.) Handbook of Neuroeconomics, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 145–170.
Fox, C. R. and Tversky, A. (1998) A belief-based account of decision under uncertainty, Management Science, 44 (7), 870–895.
Fox, J. A., Shogren, J. F., Hayes, D. J. and Kliebenstein, J. B. (1998) CVM-X: calibrating contingent values with experimental auction markets, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80, 455–465.
Frykblom, P. (1997) Hypothetical question modes and real willingness to pay, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 34 (2), 274–287.
Fujii, S. and Gärling, T. (2003) Application of attitude theory for improved predictive accuracy of stated preference methods in travel demand analysis, Transportation Research Part A, 37 (4), 389–402.
Galanti, S. and Jung, A. (1997) Low-discrepancy sequences: Monte Carlo simulation of option prices, Journal of Derivatives, 5 (1), 63–83.
Garrod, G. D., Scarpa, R. and Willis, K. G. (2002) Estimating the benefits of traffic calming on through routes: a choice experiment approach, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 36 (2), 211–232.
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1954) Choice, expectations, and measurability, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 68, 503–534.
Geweke, J. (1989) Bayesian inference in econometric models using Monte Carlo integration, Econometrica, 57 (6), 1317–1339.
Geweke, J. (1991) Efficient simulation from multivariate normal and Student-t distributions subject to linear constraints, in Keramidas, M. E. (ed.), Computer Science and Statistics: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Symposium on the Inference, Interface Foundation of North America, Inc., Fairfax, VA, 571–578.
Ghosh, A. (2001) Valuing time and reliability: commuters’ mode choice from a real time congestion pricing experiment, PhD dissertation, Department of Economics, University of California at Irvine.
Gilboa, I. and Schmeidler, D. (2001) A Theory of Case-Based Decisions, Cambridge University Press.
Gilbride, T. J. and Allenby, G. M. (2004) A choice model with conjunctive, disjunctive, and compensatory screening rules, Marketing Science, 23 (3), 391–406.
Gilbride, T. J. and Allenby, G. M. (2006). Estimating heterogeneous EBA and economic screening rule choice models, Marketing Science, 25 (5), 494–509.
Gilovich, T., Griffin, D. and Kahneman, D. (eds.) (2002) Heuristics and Biases – The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, Cambridge University Press.
Goett, A., Hudson, K. and Train, K. (2000) Customers’ choice among retail energy suppliers: the willingness-to-pay for service attributes, Energy Journal, 21 (4), 1–28.
Goldstein, W. M. and Einhorn, H. J. (1987) Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena, Psychological Review, 94 (2), 236–254.
Golob, T. (2001) Joint models of attitudes and behaviour in evaluation of the San Diego I–15 congestion pricing project, Transportation Research Part A, 35 (6), 495–514.
González, R. and Wu, G. (1999) On the shape of the probability weighting function, Cognitive Psychology, 38 (1), 129–166.
González-Vellejo, C. (2002) Making trade-offs: a probabilistic and context-sensitive model of choice behavior, Psychological Review, 109, 137–155.
Goodwin, P. (1989) The rule of three: a possible solution to the political problem of competing objectives for road pricing, Traffic Engineering and Control, 30, 495–497.
Goodwin, P. (1997) Solving congestion, Inaugural Lecture of the Professorship of Transport Policy, University College London. Available at: , retrieved 19 May 2012.
Gordon, J., Chapman, R. and Blamey, R. (2001) Assessing the options for the Canberra water supply: an application of choice modelling, in Bennett, J. and Blamey, R. (eds.), The Choice Modelling Approach to Environmental Evaluation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
Gotwalt, C. M., Jones, B. A. and Steinberg, D. M. (2009) Fast computation of designs robust to parameter uncertainty for nonlinear settings, Technometrics, 51, 88–95.
Gourieroux, C., and Monfort, A. (1996) Simulation-Based Methods Econometric Methods, Oxford University Press.
Gourville, J. T. and Soman, D. (2007). Extremeness seeking: when and why consumers prefer the extreme. Harvard Business School Working Paper 07–092.
Greene, W. H. (1997) LIMDEP version 7.0 Reference Manual, Econometric Software, New York.
Greene, W. H. (1998a) Econometric Analysis, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 4th edn.
Greene, W. H. (1998b) Gender economics courses in Liberal Arts Colleges: further results, Journal of Economic Education, 29 (4), 291–300.
Greene, W. H. (2001) Fixed and random effects in nonlinear models, Working Paper EC-01–01, Stern School of Business, Department of Economics, New York University.
Greene, W. H. (2002) LIMDEP version 8.0 Reference Manual, Econometric Software, New York.
Greene, W. H. (2004a) The behavior of the fixed effects estimator in nonlinear models, Econometrics Journal, 7 (1), 98–119.
Greene, W. H. (2004b) Fixed effects and bias due to the incidental parameters problem in the Tobit model, Econometric Reviews, 23 (2), 125–147.
Greene, W. H. (2007) Nlogit 4, Econometric Software, New York and Sydney.
Greene, W. H. (2008) Econometric Analysis, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 6th edn.
Greene, W. H. (2012) Econometric Analysis, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 7th edn.
Greene, W. H., Harris, M., Hollingsworth, B. and Maitra, P. (2008) A bivariate latent class correlated generalized ordered probit model with an application to modelling observed obesity levels, Working Paper 08–18, Stern School of Business, New York University.
Greene, W. H. and Hensher, D. A. (2007) Heteroscedastic control for random coefficients and error components in mixed logit, Transportation Research Part E, 43 (5), 610–623.
Greene, W. H. and Hensher, D. A. (2010a) Modelling Ordered Choices, Cambridge University Press.
Greene, W. H. and Hensher, D. A. (2010b) Ordered choice, heterogeneity, and attribute processing, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 44 (3), 331–264.
Greene, W. H. and Hensher, D. A. (2010c) Does scale heterogeneity across individuals matter? An empirical assessment of alternative logit models, Transportation, 37 (3), 413–428.
Greene, W. H. and Hensher, D. A. (2013) Revealing additional dimensions of preference heterogeneity in a latent class mixed multinomial logit model, Applied Economics, 45 (14), 1897–1902.
Greene, W., Hensher, D. A. and Rose, J. (2005) Using classical simulation based estimators to estimate individual willingness to pay values: a mixed logit case study of commuters, in Scarpa, R. and Alberini, A. (eds.), Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics, Springer, Dordrecht, 17–34.
Griffin, R. C. and Mjelde, J. W. (2000) Valuing water supply reliability, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82, 414–426.
Gunn, H. F. (1988) Value of travel time estimation, Working Paper 157, Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds.
Haab, T. C. and McConnell, K. E. (2002) Valuing Environmental Natural Resources: The Econometrics of Non-Market Valuation, Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA.
Haaijer, R., Wagner, K. and Wedel, M. (2000) Response latencies in the analysis of conjoint choice experiments, Journal of Marketing Research, 37, 376–382.
Hahn, G. J., and Shapiro, S. S. (1966) A Catalog and Computer Program for the Design and Analysis of Orthogonal Symmetric and Asymmetric Fractional Factorial Experiments, General Electric Research and Development Center, Schenectady, NY.
Hajivassiliou, V. and McFadden, D. (1998) The method of simulated scores for the estimation of LDV models, Econometrica, 66 (4), 863–896.
Hajivassiliou, V. and Ruud, P. (1994) Classical estimation methods for LDV models using simulation, in Engle, R. and McFadden, D. (eds.), Handbook of Econometrics, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Hall, J., Kenny, P., King., M., Louviere, J. J., Viney, R. and Yeoh, A. (2002) Using stated preference discrete choice modelling to evaluate the introduction of varicella vaccination, Health Economics, 11(10), 457–465.
Hallahan, K. (1999) Seven models of framing: implications for public relations, Journal of Public Relations Research, 11 (3), 205–242.
Halton, J. (1960) On the efficiency of certain quasi-random sequences of points in evaluating multi-dimensional integrals, Numerische Mathematik, 2, 84–90.
Halton, J. (1970) A retrospective and prospective survey of the Monte Carlo method, SIAM Review, 12 (1), 1–63.
Hammersley, J. M. and Morton, K. W. (1956) A new Monte Carlo technique: antithetic variates, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 52, Part 3, 449–475.
Hanemann, W. (1994) Valuing the environment through contingent valuation, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8 (4), 19–43.
Harrison, G. W. (2006a) Experimental evidence of alternative environmental valuation methods, Environmental and Resource Economics, 34 (1), 125–162.
Harrison, G. W. (2006b) Hypothetical bias over uncertain outcomes, in List, J. A. (ed.), Using Experimental Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics, Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA, 41–69.
Harrison, G. W. (2007) Making choice studies incentive compatible, in Kanninen, B. (ed.), Valuing Environmental Amenities Using Stated Choice Studies, Springer, Dordrecht, 67–110.
Harrison, G. W., Humphrey, S. and Verschoor, A. (2010) Choice under uncertainty: Evidence from Ethiopia, India and Uganda, Economic Journal, 120 (543), 80–104.
Harrison, G. W. and List, J. A. (2004) Field experiments, Journal of Economic Literature, 42 (4), 1013–1059.
Harrison, G. W. and Rutström, E. E. (2008) Experimental evidence on the existence of hypothetical bias in value elicitation methods, in Plott, C. R. and Smith, V. L. (eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Harrison, G. W. and Rutström, E. E. (2009) Expected utility theory and prospect theory: one wedding and a decent funeral, Journal of Experimental Economics, 12 (2), 133–158.
Hausman, J. (1978) Specification tests in econometrics, Econometrica, 46, 1251–1271.
Hausman, J. and McFadden, D. (1984) Specification tests for the multinomial logit model, Econometrica, 52, 1219–1240.
Heckman, J. (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error, Econometrica, 47, 153–161.
Heckman, J. and Singer, B. (1984a) A method for minimizing the impact of distributional assumptions in econometric models, Econometrica, 52, 271–320.
Heckman, J. and Singer, B. (1984b) Econometric duration analysis, Journal of Econometrics, 24, 63–132.
Henderson, D. and Parmeter, C. (2014) Applied Nonparametric Econometrics, Cambridge University Press.
Hensher, D. A. (1974) A Probabilistic disaggregate model of binary mode choice, in Hensher, D. A. (ed.), Urban travel choice and demand modelling, Special Report 12, Australian Road Research Board, Melbourne, August, 61–99.
Hensher, D. A. (1975) The value of commuter travel time savings: empirical estimation using an alternative valuation model, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 10 (2), 167–176.
Hensher, D. A. (1986) Sequential and full information maximum likelihood estimation of a nested-logit model, Review of Economics and Statistics, 58(4), 657–667.
Hensher, D. A. (1994) Stated preference analysis of travel choices: the state of practice, Special Issue of Transportation on The Practice of Stated Preference Analysis, 21 (2), 106–134.
Hensher, D. A. (1998) Establishing a fare elasticity regime for urban passenger transport, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 32 (2), 221–246.
Hensher, D. A. (1999) HEV choice models as a search engine for specification of nested logit tree structures, Marketing Letters, 10 (4), 333–343.
Hensher, D. A. (2001) Measurement of the valuation of travel time savings, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 35 (1), 71–98.
Hensher, D. A. (2001a) The valuation of commuter travel time savings for car drivers in New Zealand: evaluating alternative model specifications, Transportation, 28, 110–118.
Hensher, D. A. (2002) A systematic assessment of the environmental impacts of transport policy: an end use perspective, Environmental and Resource Economics, 22 (1–2), 185–217.
Hensher, D. A. (2004) Accounting for stated choice design dimensionality in willingness to pay for travel time savings, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 38 (2), 425–446.
Hensher, D. A. (2006a) The signs of the times: imposing a globally signed condition on willingness to pay distributions, Transportation, 33(3), 205–222.
Hensher, D. A. (2006b) Integrating accident and travel delay externalities in an urban context, Transport Reviews, 26 (4), 521–534.
Hensher, D. A. (2006c) Revealing differences in behavioral response due to the dimensionality of stated choice designs: an initial assessment, Environmental and Resource Economics, 34 (1), 7–44.
Hensher, D. A. (2006d) How do respondents handle stated choice experiments? – Attribute processing strategies under varying information load, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 21 (5), 861–878.
Hensher, D. A. (2008) Joint estimation of process and outcome in choice experiments and implications for willingness to pay, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 42 (2), 297–322.
Hensher, D. A. (2010a) Attribute processing, heuristics and preference construction in choice analysis, in Hess, S. and Daly, A. (eds.), Choice Modelling: The State of Art and the State of Practice, Emerald Group, Bingley, 35–70.
Hensher, D. A. (2010b) Hypothetical bias, choice experiments and willingness to pay, Transportation Research Part B, 44 (6), 735–752.
Hensher, D. A., Beck, M. J. and Rose, J. M. (2011) Accounting for preference and scale heterogeneity in establishing whether it matters who is interviewed to reveal household automobile purchase preferences, Environment and Resource Economics, 49, 1–22.
Hensher, D. A. and Bradley, M. (1993) Using stated response data to enrich revealed preference discrete choice models, Marketing Letters, 4 (2), 139–152.
Hensher, D. A. and Brewer, A. M. (2000) Transport and Economics Management, Oxford University Press.
Hensher, D. A. and Collins, A. (2011) Interrogation of responses to stated choice experiments: is there sense in what respondents tell us? A closer look at what respondents choose in stated choice experiments, Journal of Choice Modelling, 4 (1), 62–89.
Hensher, D. A. and Goodwin, P. B. (2004) Implementation of values of time savings: the extended set of considerations in a tollroad context, Transport Policy, 11 (2), 171–181.
Hensher, D. A. and Greene, W. H. (2002) Specification and estimation of the nested logit model: alternative normalisations, Transportation Research Part B, 36 (1), 1–17.
Hensher, D. A. and Greene, W. H. (2003) Mixed logit models: state of practice, Transportation, 30 (2), 133–176.
Hensher, D. A. and Greene, W. H. (2010) Non-attendance and dual processing of common-metric attributes in choice analysis: a latent class specification, Empirical Economics, 39 (2), 413–426.
Hensher, D. A. and Greene, W. H. (2011) Valuation of travel time savings in WTP and preference space in the presence of taste and scale heterogeneity, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 45 (3), 505–525.
Hensher, D. A., Greene, W. H. and Chorus, C. (2013) Random regret minimisation or random utility maximisation: an exploratory analysis in the context of automobile fuel choice, Journal of Advanced Transportation, 47, 667–678.
Hensher, D. A., Greene, W. H. and Li, Z. (2011) Embedding risk attitude and decision weights in non-linear logit to accommodate time variability in the value of expected travel time savings, Transportation Research Part B, 45 (7), 954–972.
Hensher, D. A. and Johnson, L. W. (1981) Applied Discrete-Choice Modelling, Croom Helm, London/John Wiley, New York.
Hensher, D. A. and King, J. (2001) Parking demand and responsiveness to supply, pricing and location in the Sydney Central Business District, Transportation Research Part A, 5 (3), 177–196.
Hensher, D. A. and Knowles, L. (2007) Spatial alliances of public transit operators: establishing operator preferences for area management contracts with government, in Macario, R., Viega, J. and Hensher, D. A. (eds.), Competition and Ownership of Land Passenger Transport, Elsevier, Oxford, 517–546.
Hensher, D. A. and Layton, D. (2010) Common-metric attribute parameter transfer and cognitive rationalisation: implications for willingness to pay, Transportation, 37 (3), 473–490.
Hensher, D. A. and Li, Z. (2012) Valuing travel time variability within a rank-dependent utility framework and an investigation of unobserved taste heterogeneity, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 46 (2), 293–312.
Hensher, D. A. and Li, Z. (2013) Referendum voting in road pricing reform: a review of the evidence, Transport Policy, 25 (1), 186–97.
Hensher, D. A., Li, Z. and Rose, J. M. (2013) Accommodating risk in the valuation of expected travel time savings, Journal of Advanced Transportation, 47 (2), 206–224.
Hensher, D. A., Louviere, J. J. and Swait, J. (1999) Combining sources of preference data, Journal of Econometrics, 89, 197–221.
Hensher, D. A. and Mulley, C. (2014) Complementing distance based charges with discounted registration fees in the reform of road user charges: the impact for motorists and government revenue, Transportation, .
Hensher, D. A., Mulley, C. and Rose, J. M. (2014, in press) Understanding the relationship between voting preferences for public transport and perceptions and preferences for bus rapid transit versus light rail, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy.
Hensher, D. A. and Prioni, P. (2002) A service quality index for area-wide contract performance assessment, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 36, 93–113.
Hensher, D. A. and Puckett, S. M. (2007) Congestion charging as an effective travel demand management instrument, Transportation Research Part A, 41 (5), 615–626.
Hensher, D. A., Puckett, S. M. and Rose, J. M. (2007a) Extending stated choice analysis to recognise agent-specific attribute endogeneity in bilateral group negotiation and choice: a think piece, Transportation, 34 (6), 667–679.
Hensher, D. A., Puckett, S. and Rose, J. (2007b) Agency decision making in freight distribution chains: revealing a parsimonious empirical strategy from alternative behavioural structures, Transportation Research Part B, 41 (9), 924–949.
Hensher, D. A. and Rose, J. M (2007) Development of commuter and non-commuter mode choice models for the assessment of new public transport infrastructure projects: a case study, Transportation Research Part A, 41 (5), 428–433.
Hensher, D. A. and Rose, J. M (2009) Simplifying choice through attribute preservation or non-attendance: implications for willingness to pay, Transportation Research Part E, 45 (4), 583–590.
Hensher, D. A. and Rose, J. M (2012) The influence of alternative acceptability, attribute thresholds and choice response certainty on automobile purchase preferences, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 46 (3), 451–468.
Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M. and Beck, M. J. (2012) Are there specific design elements of choice experiments and types of people that influence choice response certainty?, Journal of Choice Modelling, 5 (1), 77–97.
Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M. and Collins, A. T. (2011) Identifying commuter preferences for existing modes and a proposed Metro, Public Transport – Planning and Operation, online, , 3:109–147.
Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M. and Black, I. (2008) Interactive agency choice in automobile purchase decisions: the role of negotiation in determining equilibrium choice outcomes, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 42 (2), 269–296.
Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M. and Collins, A. (2013) Understanding buy in for risky prospects: incorporating degree of belief into the ex ante assessment of support for alternative road pricing schemes, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 47 (3), 453–73.
Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. and Greene, W. (2005a) The implications on willingness to pay of respondents ignoring specific attributes, Transportation, 32 (3), 203–220.
Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. and Greene, W. H. (2005b) Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer, Cambridge University Press.
Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. and Greene, W. H. (2012) Inferring attribute non-attendance from stated choice data: implications for willingness to pay estimates and a warning for stated choice experiment design, Transportation, 39 (2), 235–245.
Hensher, D. A., Shore, N. and Train, K. N. (2005) Households’ willingness to pay for water service attributes, Environmental and Resource Economics, 32, 509–531.
Hess, S. and Hensher, D. A. (2010) Using conditioning on observed choices to retrieve individual-specific attribute processing strategies, Transportation Research Part B, 44 (6), 781–790.
Hess, S., Hensher, D. A. and Daly, A. J. (2012) Not bored yet – revisiting respondent fatigue in stated choice experiments, Transportation Research Part A, 46 (3), 626–644.
Hess, S. and Rose, J. M. (2007) A latent class approach to modelling heterogeneous information processing strategies in SP studies, Paper presented at the Oslo Workshop on Valuation Methods in Transport Planning, Oslo.
Hess, S. and Rose, J. M. (2012) Can scale and coefficient heterogeneity be separated in random coefficients models?, Transportation, 39 (6), 1225–1239.
Hess, S., Rose, J. M. and Bain, S. (2010) Random scale heterogeneity in discrete choice models, Paper presented at the 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Hess, S., Rose, J. M. and Hensher, D. A. (2008) Asymmetrical preference formation in willingness to pay estimates in discrete choice models, Transportation Research Part E, 44 (5), 847–863.
Hess, S., Stathopoulos, A. and Daly, A. (2012) Allowing for heterogeneous decision rules in discrete choice models: an approach and four case studies, Transportation, 39 (3), 565–591.
Hess, S., Train, K. E. and Polak, J. W. (2004) On the use of randomly shifted and shuffled uniform vectors in the estimation of the mixed logit model for vehicle choice, Paper presented at the 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Hess, S., Train, K. E. and Polak, J. W. (2006) On the use of a Modified Latin Hypercube Sampling (MLHS) approach in the estimation of a mixed logit model for vehicle choice, Transportation Research Part B, 40 (2), 147–163.
Hole, A. R. (2011) A discrete choice model with endogenous attribute attendance, Economics Letters, 110 (3), 203–205.
Hollander, Y. (2006) Direct versus indirect models for the effects of unreliability, Transportation Research Part A, 40 (9), 699–711.
Holmes, C. (1974) A statistical evaluation of rating scales, Journal of the Market Research Society, 16, 87–107.
Holt, C. A. and Laury, S. K. (2002) Risk aversion and incentive effects, American Economic Review, 92 (5), 1644–1655.
Houston, D. A. and Sherman, S. J. (1995) Cancellation and focus: the role of shared and unique features in the choice process, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 357–378.
Houston, D. A., Sherman, S. J. and Baker, S. M. (1989) The influence of unique features and direction of comparison on preferences, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 121–141.
Howe, C. W. and Smith, M. G. (1994) The value of water supply reliability in urban water systems, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26, 19–30. Available at: .
Huber, J. and Zwerina, K. (1996) The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs, Journal of Marketing Research, 33, 307–317.
Hudson, D., Gallardo, K. and Hanson, T. (2006) Hypothetical (non)bias in choice experiments: evidence from freshwater prawns, Working Paper. Department of Agricultural Economics, Mississippi State University.
Hull, C. L. (1943) Principles of Behavior, Appleton-Century, New York.
Idson, L. C., Krantz, D. H., Osherson, D. and Bonini, N. (2001) The relation between probability and evidence judgment: an extension of support theory, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 22 (3), 227–249.
Isacsson, G. (2007) The trade off between time and money: is there a difference between real and hypothetical choices?, Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, Borlange.
Ison, S. (1998) The saleability of urban road pricing, Economic Affairs, 18 (4), 21–25.
Johannesson, M., Blomquist, G., Blumenschien, K., Johansson, P., Liljas, B. and O’Connor, R. (1999) Calibrating hypothetical willingness to pay responses, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 8 (1), 21–32.
Johansson-Stenman, O. and Svedsäter, H. (2003) Self image and choice experiments: hypothetical and actual willingness to pay, Working Papers in Economics 94, Department of Economics, Gothenburg University.
John, J. A. and Draper, N. R. (1980) An alternative family of transformations, Applied Statistics, 29, 190–197.
Johnson, F. R., Kanninen, B. J. and Bingham, M. (2006) Experimental design for stated choice studies, in Kanninen, B. J. (ed.) Valuing Environmental Amenities Using Stated Choice Studies: A Common Sense Approach to Theory and Practice, Springer, Dordrecht, 159–202.
Johnson, R. and Orme, B. (2003) Getting the most from CBC, Sawtooth Conference Paper, Sawtooth ART Conference, Beaver Creek.
Jones, B. D. (1999) Bounded rationality, Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 297–321.
Jones, P. M. (1998) Urban road pricing: public acceptability and barriers to implementation, inButton, K. J. and Verhoef, E. T. (eds.), Road Pricing, Traffic Congestion and the Environment: Issues of Efficiency and Social Feasibility, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 263–284.
Jones, S. and Hensher, D. A. (2004) Predicting financial distress: a mixed logit model, Accounting Review, 79 (4), 1011–1038.
Joreskog, K. G. and Goldberger, A. S. (1975) Estimation of a model with multiple indicators and multiple causes of a single latent variable, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70 (351), 631–639.
Jou, R. (2001) Modelling the impact of pre-trip information on commuter departure time and route choice, Transportation Research Part B, 35 (10), 887–902.
Jovicic, G. and Hansen, C. O. (2003) A passenger travel demand model for Copenhagen, Transportation Research Part A, 37 (4), 333–349.
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica, 47 (2), 263–292.
Kanninen, B. J. (2002) Optimal design for multinomial choice experiments, Journal of Marketing Research, 39, 214–217.
Kanninen, B. J. (2005) Optimal design for binary choice experiments with quadratic or interactive terms, Paper presented at the 2005 International Health Economics Association conference, Barcelona.
Karmarkar, U. S. (1978) Weighted subjective utility: a descriptive extension of the expected utility model, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21 (1), 61–72.
Kates, R. W. (1979) The Australian experience: summary and prospect, in Heathcote, R. L. and Thom, B. G. (eds.), Natural Hazards in Australia, Australian Academy of Science, Canberra, 511–520.
Kaye-Blake, W. H., Abell, W. L. and Zellman, E. (2009) Respondents’ ignoring of attribute information in a choice modelling survey, Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 53, 547–564.
Keane, M. (1990) Four essays in empirical macro and labor economics, PhD thesis, Brown University.
Keane, M. (1994) A computationally practical simulation estimator for panel data, Econometrica, 62 (1), 95–116.
Keane, M. (2006) The generalized logit model: preliminary ideas on a research program, Presentation at Motorola–CenSoC Hong Kong Meeting, 22 October.
Keppel, G. and Wickens, D. W. (2004) Design and Analysis: A Researcher’s Handbook, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 4th edn.
Kessels, R., Bradley, B., Goos, P. and Vandebroek, M. (2009) An efficient algorithm for constructing Bayesian optimal choice designs, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 27 (2), 279–291.
Kessels, R., Goos, P. and Vandebroek, M. (2006) A comparison of criteria to design efficient choice experiments, Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 409–419.
King, D., Manville, M. and Shoup, D. (2007) The political calculus of congestion pricing, Transport Policy, 14 (2), 111–123.
King, G., Murray, C., Salomon, J. and Tandon, A. (2004) Enhancing the validity and cross-cultural comparability of measurement in survey research, American Political Science Review, 98, 191–207.
King, G. and Wand, J. (2007) Comparing incomparable survey responses: new tools for anchoring vignettes, Political Analysis, 15, 46–66.
Kivetz, R., Netzer, O. and Srinivasan, V. (2004) Alternative models for capturing the compromise effect, Journal of Marketing Research, 41 (3), 237–257.
Klein, R. and Spady, R. (1993) An efficient semiparametric estimator for discrete choice models, Econometrica, 61, 387–421.
Knight, F. H. (1921) Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, University of Chicago Press.
Koss, P. and Sami Khawaja, M. (2001) The value of water supply reliability in California: a contingent valuation study, Water Policy, 3, 165–174.
Krantz, D. H. (1991) From indices to mappings: the representational approach to measurement, in Brown, D. and Smith, E. (eds.), Frontiers of Mathematical Psychology: Essays in Honour of Clyde Coombs, Springer, New York, 1–52.
Krinsky, I. and Robb, A. L. (1986) On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities, Review of Economics and Statistics, 68, 715–719.
Krosnick, J. A. and Schuman, H. (1988) Attitude intensity importance, and certainty and susceptibility to response effects, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 (6), 940–952.
Kuehl, R. O. (1994) Statistical Principles of Research Design and Analysis, Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA.
Kuehl, R. O. (2000) Statistical Principles of Research Design and Analysis, Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, CA, 2nd edn.
Kuhfeld, W. F., Tobias, R. D. and Garratt, M. (1994) Efficient experimental design with marketing research applications, Journal of Marketing Research, 21, 545–557.
Ladenburg, J., Olsen, S. and Nielsen, R. (2007) Reducing hypothetical bias in choice experiments, Powerpoint presentation, Institute of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen.
Lam, S. H. and Xie, F. (2002) Transit path models that use revealed preference and stated preference data, Transportation Research Record, 1779, 58–65.
Lampietti, J. (1999) Do husbands and wives make the same choices? Evidence from Northern Ethiopia, Economics Letters, 62, 253–260.
Lancaster, K. J. (1966) A new approach to consumer theory, Journal of Political Economy, 74 (2), 132–157.
Lancsar, E. and Louviere, J. J. (2006) Deleting ‘irrational’ responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences?, Health Economics, 15, 797–811.
Landry, C. E. and List, J. A. (2007) Using ex ante approaches to obtain credible signals for value in contingent markets: evidence from the field, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 89 (2), 420–429.
Lattimore, P., Baker, J. and Witte, A. (1992) The influence of probability on risky choice – a parametric examination, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 17 (3), 377–400.
Laury, S. K. and Holt, C. A. (2000) Further reflections on prospect theory, Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
Lave, C. (1970) The demand for urban mass transit, Review of Economics and Statistics, 52, 320–323.
Layton, D. and Hensher, D. A. (2010) Aggregation of common-metric attributes in preference revelation in choice experiments and implications for willingness to pay, Transportation Research Part D, 15 (7), 394–404.
Lazari, A. G. and Anderson, D. A. (1994) Designs of discrete choice experiments for estimating both attribute and availability cross effects, Journal of Marketing Research, 31(3), 375–383.
Lee, L. (1995) Asymptotic bias in simulated maximum likelihood estimation of discrete choice models, Econometric Theory, 11, 437–483.
Leong, W. and Hensher, D. A. (2012) Embedding decision heuristics in discrete choice models: a review, Transport Reviews, 32 (3), 313–331.
Levinson, D. (2010) Equity effects of road pricing: a review, Transport Reviews, 30 (1), 33–57.
Li, Q. and Racine, J. (2007) Nonparametric Econometrics, Princeton University Press.
Li, Q. and Racine, J. (2010) Smooth varying-coefficient estimation and inference for qualitative and quantitative data, Econometric Theory, 26, 1607–1637.
Li, Z. and Hensher, D. A. (2010) Toll roads in Australia: an overview of characteristics and accuracy of demand forecasts, Transport Reviews, 30 (5), 541–569.
Li, Z. and Hensher, D. A. (2011) Prospect theoretic contributions in understanding traveller behaviour: a review and some comments, Transport Reviews, 31 (1), 97–117.
Li, Z. and Hensher, D. A. (2012) Congestion charging and car use: a review of stated preference and opinion studies and market monitoring evidence, Transport Policy, 20, 47–61.
Li, B. and Hensher, D. A. (2015) Choice analysis for risky prospects, submitted toJournal of Econometrics, 3 February.
Li, Z., Hensher, D. A. and Rose, J. M. (2010) Willingness to pay for travel time reliability in passenger transport: a review and some new empirical evidence, Transportation Research Part E, 46 (3), 384–403.
Lindzey, G. (1954) The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. II, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Lisco, T. (1967) The value of commuters’ travel time: a study in urban transportation, PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.
List, J. A. (2001) Do explicit warnings eliminate the hypothetical bias in elicitation procedures?: evidence from field auctions for sportscards, American Economic Review, 91(5), 1498–1507.
List, J. A. and Gallet, G. (2001) What experimental protocol influence disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values?, Environmental and Resource Economics, 20 (2), 241–254.
List, J., Sinha, P. and Taylor, M. (2006) Using choice experiments to value non-market goods and services: evidence from field experiments, Advances in Economic Analysis and Policy, 6 (2), 1132–1132.
Liu, Y.-H. and Mahmassani, H. S. (2000) Global maximum likelihood estimation procedure for multinomial probit model parameters, Transportation Research Part B, Special Issue: Methodological Development in Travel Behaviour Research, 34B (5), 419–449.
Long, J. S. (1997), Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables, Sage, New York.
Long, J. S. and Frees, J. (2006) Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables Using Stata, Stata Press, College Station, TX.
Louviere, J. J. (2003) Random utility theory-based stated preference elicitation methods: applications in health economics with special reference to combining sources of preference data, keynote address, Australian Health Economics Society Conference, Canberra.
Louviere, J. J., Carson, R. T., Ainslie, A., Cameron, T. A., DeShazo, J. R., Hensher, D. A., Kohn, R., Marley, T. and Street, D. J. (2002) Dissecting the random component of utility, Marketing Letters, 13, 177–193.
Louviere, J. J. and Eagle, T. (2006) Confound it! That pesky little scale constant messes up our convenient assumptions, Proceedings of the 2006 Sawtooth Software Conference, Sawtooth Software, Sequem, Washington, DC, 211–218.
Louviere, J. J. and Hensher, D. A. (1982) On the design and analysis of simulated choice or allocation experiments in travel choice modelling, Transportation Research Record, 890, 11–17.
Louviere, J. J. and Hensher, D. A. (1983) Using discrete choice models with experimental design data to forecast consumer demand for a unique cultural event, Journal of Consumer Research, 10 (3), 348–361.
Louviere, J. J. and Hensher, D. A. (2001) Combining preference data, in Hensher, D. A. (ed.), The Leading Edge of Travel Behaviour Research, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 125–144.
Louviere, J., Hensher, D. A. and Swait, J. (2000) Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications, Cambridge University Press.
Louviere, J. J. and Islam, T. (2008) A comparison of importance weights and willingness-to-pay measures derived from choice-based conjoint, constant sum scales and best–worst scaling, Journal of Business Research, 61, 903–911.
Louviere, J. J., Islam, T., Wasi, N., Street, D. and Burgess, L. (2008) Designing discrete choice experiments: do optimal designs come at a price?, Journal of Consumer Research, 35 (2), 360–375.
Louviere, J. J. and Lanscar, E. (2009) Choice experiments in health: the good, the bad, and the ugly and toward a brighter future, Health Economics, Policy and Law, 4 (4), 527–546.
Louviere, J. J., Lings, I., Islam, T., Gudergan, S. and Flynn, T. (2013) An introduction to the application of (case 1) best–worst scaling in marketing research, International Journal of Marketing Research, 30, 292–303.
Louviere, J. J., Meyer, R. J., Bunch, D. S., Carson, R., Dellaert, B., Hanemann, W. A., Hensher, D. A. and Irwin, J. (1999) Combining sources of preference data for modelling complex decision processes, Marketing Letters, 10 (3), 205–217.
Louviere, J., Oppewal, H., Timmermans, H. and Thomas, T. (2003) Handling large numbers of attributes in conjoint applications, Working Paper 3.
Louviere, J. J., Street, D., Burgess, L., Wasi, N., Islam, T. and Marley, A. A. J. (2008) Modelling the choices of individual decision makers by combining efficient choice experiment designs with extra preference information, Journal of Choice Modelling, 1(1), 128–163.
Louviere, J. J. and Woodworth, G. (1983) Design and analysis of simulated consumer choice or allocation experiments: an approach based on aggregate data, Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 350–367.
Luce, R. D. (1959) Individual Choice Behavior, Wiley, New York.
Luce, R. D. and Suppes, P. (1965) Preference, utility and subjective probability, in Luce, R. D., Bush, R. R. and Galanter, E. (eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. III, Wiley, New York.
Lui, Y. and Mahmassani, H. (2000) Global maximum likelihood estimation procedures for multinomial probit (MNP) model parameters, Transportation Research Part B, 34 (5), 419–444.
Lundhede, T. H., Olsen, S. B., Jacobsen, J. B. and Thorsen, B. J. (2009) Handling respondent uncertainty in choice experiments: evaluating recoding approaches against explicit modelling of uncertainty, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen.
Lusk, J. L. (2003) Willingness to pay for golden rice, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85 (4), 840–856.
Lusk, J. L. and Norwood, F. B. (2005) Effect of experimental design on choice-based conjoint valuation estimates, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87 (3), 771–785.
Lusk, J. and Schroeder, T. (2004) Are choice experiments incentive compatible? A test with quality differentiated beef steaks, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86 (2), 467–482.
Maddala, G. S. (1983) Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics, Cambridge University Press.
Maddala, T., Phillip, K. A. and Johnson, F. R. (2003) An experiment on simplifying conjoint analysis designs for measuring preferences, Health Economics, 12, 1035–1047.
Malhotra, N. K. (1982) Information load and consumer decision making, Journal of Consumer Research, 8(4), 419–430.
Manheim, C. F. (1973) Practical implications of some fundamental properties of travel demand models, Highway Research Record, 244, 21–38.
Manly, B. F. (1976) Exponential data transformation, The Statistician, 25, 37–42.
Manski, C. F. (1977) The structure of random utility models, Theory and Decisions, 8, 229–254.
Manski, C. F. and Lerman, S. R. (1977) The estimation of choice probabilities from choice-based samples, Econometrica, 45 (8), 1977–1988.
Manski, C. F. and McFadden, D. (1981) Alternative estimators and sample designs for discrete choice analysis, in Manski, C. F. and McFadden, D. (eds.), Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2–50.
Manville, M. and King, D. (2013) Credible commitment and congestion pricing, Transportation, 40, 229–250.
Marcucci, E., Marini, M. and Ticchi, D. (2005) Road pricing as a citizen-candidate game, European Transport, 31, 28–45.
Marcucci, E., Stathopoulos, A., Rotaris, L. and Danielis, R. (2011) Comparing single and joint preferences: a choice experiment on residential location in three-member households, Environment and Planning Part A, 43 (5), 1209–1225.
Marley, A. A. J. and Louviere, J. J. (2005) Some probabilistic models of best, worst, and best–worst choices, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 49, 464–480.
Marley, A. A. J. and Pihlens, D. (2012) Models of best–worst choice and ranking among multi-attribute options (profiles), Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56, 24–34.
Marschak, J. (1959) Binary choice constraints and random utility indicators, in Arrow, K. J. (ed.), Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences, Stanford University Press.
McClelland, G. H. and Judd, C. M. (1993) The statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects, Psychological Bulletin, 144 (2), 376–390.
McFadden, D. (1968) The revealed preferences of a public bureaucracy, Department of Economics, University of California.
McFadden, D. (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior, in Zarembka, P. (ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics, Academic Press: New York, 105–142.
McFadden, D. (1981) Econometric models of probabilistic choice, in Manski, C. and McFadden, D. (eds.), Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 198–272.
McFadden, D. (1984) Econometric analysis of qualitative response models, in Griliches, Z. and Intrilligator, M. (eds.), Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. II, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
McFadden, D. (1989) A method of simulated moments for estimation of discrete response models without numerical integration, Econometrica, 57 (5), 995–1026.
McFadden, D. (1998) Measuring willingness-to-pay for transportation improvements, in Garling, T., Laitila, T. and Westin, K. (eds.), Theoretical Foundations of Travel Choice Modelling, Elsevier, Oxford, 339–364.
McFadden, D. (2001a) Disaggregate behavioural travel demand RUM side – a 30 years retrospective, in Hensher, D. A. (ed.), Travel Behaviour Research: The Leading Edge, Pergamon, Oxford, 17–64.
McFadden, D. (2001b) Economic choices, Nobel Lecture, December 2000, American Economic Review, 91 (3), 351–378.
McFadden, D. and Train, K. (2000) Mixed MNL models for discrete response, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15 (5), 447–470.
McNair, B. J., Bennett, J. and Hensher, D. A. (2010) Strategic response to a sequence of discrete choice questions, 54th Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society. Adelaide.
McNair, B. J., Bennett, J. and Hensher, D. A. (2011) A comparison of responses to single and repeated discrete choice questions, Resource and Energy Economics, 33, 544–571.
McNair, B., Hensher, D. A. and Bennett, J. (2012) Modelling heterogeneity in response behaviour towards a sequence of discrete choice questions: a probabilistic decision process model, Environment and Resource Economics, 51, 599–616.
Meral, G. H. (1979) Local drought-induced conservation: California experiences, Proceedings of the Conference on Water Conservation: Needs and Implementing Strategies, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York.
Meyer, R. K. and Nachtsheim, C. J. (1995) The coordinate-exchange algorithm for constructing exact optimal experimental designs, Technometrics, 37 (1), 60–69.
Mongin, P. (1997) Expected utility theory, in Davis, J., Hands, W. and Mäki, U. (eds.) Handbook of Economic Methodology, Edward Elgar, London, 342–350.
Morikawa, T. (1989) Incorporating stated preference data in travel demand analysis, PhD dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, MIT.
Morikawa, T., Ben-Akiva, M. and McFadden, D. (2002) Discrete choice models incorporating revealed preferences and psychometric data, in Franses, P. H. and Montgomery, A. L. (eds.), Econometric Models in Marketing, Vol. 16, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 29–55.
Morokoff, W. J. and Caflisch, R. E. (1995) Quasi-Monte Carlo integration, Journal of Computational Physics, 122 (2), 218–230.
Mundlak, Y. (1978) On the pooling of time series and cross sectional data, Econometrica, 56, 69–86.
Murphy, J., Allen, P., Stevens, T. and Weatherhead, D. (2004) A meta-analysis of hypothetical bias in stated preference valuation, Department of Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, January.
Murphy, J., Allen, P., Stevens, T. and Weatherhead, D. (2005) Is cheap talk effective at eliminating hypothetical bias in a provision point mechanism?, Environmental and Resource Economics, 30 (3), 313–325.
Nelson, J. O. (1979) Northern California rationing lessons, Proceedings of the Conference on Water Conservation: Needs and Implementing Strategies, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York.
Niederreiter, H. (1992) Random number generation and quasi-Monte Carlo methods, CBMS-NFS Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics, 63, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA.
Noland, R. B. and Polak, J. W. (2002) Travel time variability: a review of theoretical and empirical issues, Transport Reviews, 22 (1), 39–93.
Ohler, T., Li, A., Louviere, J. J. and Swait, J. (2000) Attribute range effects in binary response tasks, Marketing Letters, 11 (3), 249–260.
Olshavsky, R. W. (1979) Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: a replication and extension, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 24, 300–316.
Orme, B. (1998) Sample size issues for conjoint analysis studies, Sawtooth Software Technical Paper.
Ortúzar, J. de D., Iacobelli, A. and Valeze, C. (2000) Estimating demand for a cycle-way network, Transportation Research Part A, 34 (5), 353–373.
Ortúzar, J. de D. and Willumsen, P. (2011) Transport Modelling, Wiley, New York, 4th edn.
Pareto, V. (1906) Manuale di economia politica, con una introduzione alla scienza sociale, Societa Editrice Libraria, Milan.
Park, Y.-H., Ding, M. and Rao, V. (2008) Eliciting preference for complex products: a web-based upgrading method, Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 562–574.
Paterson, R. W., Boyle, K. J., Parmeter, C. F., Beumann, J. E. and De Civita, P. (2008) Heterogeneity in preferences for smoking cessation, Health Economics, 17 (12), 1363–1377.
Paulhus, D. L. (1991) Measurement and control of response bias, in Robinson, P. J., Shaver, P. R. and Wrightsman, L. S. (eds.), Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 17–59.
Payne, J. D. (1972) The effects of reversing the order of verbal rating scales in a postal survey, Journal of the Market Research Society, 14, 30–44.
Payne, J. W. (1976) Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: an information search and protocol analysis, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 366–387.
Payne, J. W. and Bettman, J. R. (1992) Behavioural decision research: a constructive processing perspective, Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 87–131.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R. and Johnson, E. J. (1993) The Adaptive Decision Maker, Cambridge University Press.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R. and Schkade, D. A. (1999) Measuring constructed preferences: towards a building code, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 243–270.
Peeta, S., Ramos, J. L. and Pasupathy, R. (2000) Content of variable message signs and on-line driver behavior, Transportation Research Record, 1725, 102–103.
Peirce, C. S. (1876) Note on the Theory of the Economy of Research, Coast Survey Report, 197–201.
Pendyala, R. and Bricka, S. (2006). Collection and analysis of behavioural process data: challenges and opportunities, in Stopher, P. and Stecher, C. (eds.), Travel Survey Methods: Quality and Future Directions, Elsevier, Oxford.
Peters, R. P. and Kramer, J. (2012) Just who should pay for what? Vertical equity, transit subsidy and broad pricing: the case of New York City, Journal of Public Transportation, 15 (2), 117–136.
Poe, G., Giraud, K. and Loomis, J. (2005) Simple computational methods for measuring the difference of empirical distributions: application to internal and external scope tests in contingent valuation, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87 (2), 353–365.
Polak, J. (1987) A more general model of individual departure time choice transportation planning methods, Proceedings of Seminar C held at the PTRC Summer Annual Meeting, P290, 247–258.
Polak, J., Hess, S. and Liu, X. (2008) Characterising heterogeneity in attitudes to risk in expected utility models of mode and departure time choice, Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board (TRB) 87th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
Portney, P. R. (1994) The contingent valuation debate: why economists should care, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8 (4), 3–17.
Powers, D. A. and Xie, Y. (2000) Statistical Methods for Categorical Data Analysis, Academic Press, New York.
Powers, E. A., Morrow, P., Goudy, W. J. and Keith, P. (1977) Serial order preference in survey research, Public Opinion Quarterly, 41 (1), 80–85.
Prato, C. G., Bekhor, S. and Pronello, C. (2012) Latent variables and route choice behaviour, Transportation, 39 (3), 299–319.
Pratt, J. (1981) Concavity of the log likelihood, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 103–106.
Prelec, D. (1998) The probability weighting function, Econometrica, 66 (3), 497–527.
Puckett, S. M. and Hensher, D. A. (2009) Revealing the extent of process heterogeneity in choice analysis: an empirical assessment, Transportation Research Part A, 43 (2), 117–126.
Puckett, S. M. and Hensher, D. A. (2006) Modelling interdependent behaviour utilising a sequentially-administered stated choice experiment: analysis of urban road freight stakeholders, Conference for the International Association of Transport Behaviour Research, Kyoto.
Puckett, S. M. and Hensher, D. A. (2008) The role of attribute processing strategies in estimating the preferences of road freight stakeholders under variable road user charges, Transportation Research Part E, 44, 379–395.
Puckett, S. M., Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M. and Collins, A., (2007) Design and development of a stated choice experiment for interdependent agents: accounting for interactions between buyers and sellers of urban freight services, Transportation, 34 (4), 429–451.
Pudney, S. and Shields, M. (2000) Gender, race, pay and promotion in the British nursing profession: estimation of a generalized ordered probit model, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15 (4), 367–399.
Pullman, M. E., Dodson, K. J. and Moore, W. L. (1999) A comparison of conjoint methods when there are many attributes, Marketing Letters, 10, 1–14.
Quan, W., Rose, J. M., Collins, A. T. and Bliemer, M. C. J. (2011) A comparison of algorithms for generating efficient choice experiments, Working Paper ITLS-WP-11-19, Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies, University of Sydney.
Quandt, R. E. (1970) The Demand for Travel: Theory and Measurement, D.C. Heath, Lexington, MA.
Quiggin, J. (1982) A theory of anticipated utility, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3 (4), 323–343.
Quiggin, J. (1994) Regret theory with general choice sets, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 8 (2), 153–165.
Quiggin, J. (1995) Regret theory with general choice sets, Risk and Uncertainty, 8 (2), 153–165.
Quiggin, J. (1998) Individual and household willingness to pay for public goods, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80, 58–63.
Racevskis, L. and Lupi, F. (2008) Incentive compatibility in an attribute-based referendum model, Paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL, 27–29 July.
Rasch, G. (1960) Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests, Denmark Paedogiska, Copenhagen.
Rasouli, S. and Timmermans, H. (2014) Specification of regret-based models of choice behavior: formal analyses and experimental design based evidence, Eindhoven University of Technology.
Restle, F. (1961) Psychology of Judgment and Choice, Wiley, New York.
Revelt, D. and Train, K. (1998) Mixed logit with repeated choices: households’ choices of appliance efficiency level, Review of Economics and Statistics, 80 (4), 647–657.
Riedl, R., Brandstatter, E. and Roithmayr, F. (2008). Identifying decision strategies: a process- and outcome-based classification method, Behavior Research Methods, 40 (3): 795–807.
Riphahn, R., Wambach, A. and Million, A. (2003) Incentive effects in the demand for health care: a bivariate panel count estimation, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18 (4), 387–405.
Roberts, J. A., Hann, L.-H. and Slaughter, S. A. (2006) Understanding the motivations, participation, and performance of open source software development: a longitudinal study of the Apache Projects, Management Science, 52 (7), 984–999.
Roeder, K., Lynch, K. and Nagin, D. (1999) Modeling uncertainty in latent class membership: a case study in criminology, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, 766–776.
Rose, J. M. (2014) Interpreting discrete choice models based on best–worst data: a matter of framing, 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board TRB 2014, Washington DC, 16 January.
Rose, J. M., Bain, S. and Bliemer, M. C. J. (2011) Experimental design strategies for stated preference studies dealing with non market goods, in Bennett, J. (ed.), International Handbook on Non-Marketed Environmental Valuation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 273–299.
Rose, J. M., Bekker de-Grob, E. and Bliemer, E. (2012) If theoretical framework matters, then why are we ignoring their tenants? An (re)examination of random utility theory and beyond, Working Paper, Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies, The University of Sydney, November.
Rose, J. M. and Black, I. (2006) Means matter, but variances matter too: decomposing response latency influences on variance heterogeneity in stated preference experiments, Marketing Letters, 17 (4), 295–310.
Rose, J. M. and Bliemer, M. C. J. (2004) The design of stated choice experiments: the state of practice and future challenges, Working Paper ITS-WP-04-09, Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies, University of Sydney.
Rose, J. M. and Bliemer, M. C. J. (2005) Sample optimality in the design of stated choice experiments, Report ITLS-WP-05-13, Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies, University of Sydney.
Rose, J. M. and Bliemer, M. C. J. (2006) Designing efficient data for stated choice experiments, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Kyoto.
Rose, J. M. and Bliemer, M. C. J. (2008) Stated preference experimental design strategies, in Hensher, D. A. and Button, K. J. (eds), Handbook of Transport Modelling, Elsevier, Oxford, 151–179.
Rose, J. M. and Bliemer, M. C. J. (2009) Constructing efficient stated choice experimental designs, Transport Reviews, 29 (5), 587–617.
Rose, J. M. and Bliemer, M. C. J. (2011) Stated preference experimental design strategies, in Hensher, D. A. (ed.), Transport Economics: Critical Concepts in Economics, Vol. 1, Routledge, Oxford, 304–332.
Rose, J. M. and Bliemer, M. C. J. (2012) Sample optimality in the design of stated choice experiments, in Pendyala, R. and Bhat, C. (eds), Travel Behaviour Research in the Evolving World, IATBR, Jaipur, 119–145.
Rose, J. M. and Bliemer, M. C. J. (2013) Sample size requirements for stated choice experiments, Transportation, 40 (5), 1021–1041.
Rose, J. M. and Bliemer, M. C. J. (2014) Stated choice experimental design theory: the who, the what and the why, in Hess, S. and Daly, A. (eds.), Handbook of Choice Modelling, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
Rose, J., Bliemer, M., Hensher, D. A. and Collins, A. (2008) Designing efficient stated choice experiments in the presence of reference alternatives, Transportation Research Part B, 42 (4), 395–406.
Rose, J. and Hensher, D. A. (2004) Modelling agent interdependency in group decision making: methodological approaches to interactive agent choice experiments, Transportation Research Part E, 40 (1), 63–79.
Rose, J. and Hensher, D. A. (2014) Tollroads are only part of the overall trip: the error of our ways in past willingness to pay studies, Transportation, 41 (4), 819–837.
Rose, J., Hensher, D. A. and Greene, W. (2005) Recovering costs through price and service differentiation: accounting for exogenous information on attribute processing strategies in airline choice, Journal of Air Transport Management, 11, 400–407.
Rose, J. M., Scarpa, R. and Bliemer, M. C. J. (2009) Incorporating model uncertainty into the generation of efficient stated choice experiments: a model averaging approach, International Choice Modelling Conference, March 30-April 1, Harrogate.
Rumelhart, D. L. and Greeno, J. G. (1968) Choice between similar and dissimilar objects: an experimental test of the Luce and Restle choice models, presented at the Midwestern Psychological Association meeting, Chicago, May.
Russell, C. S., Arey, D. G. and Kates, R. W. (1970) Drought and Water Supply: Implications of the Massachusetts Experience for Municipal Planning, Johns Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future, Inc., Baltimore, MD.
Russo, J. E. and Dosher, B. A. (1983) Strategies for multiattribute binary choice, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 9 (4), 676–696.
Sakia, R. M. (1992) The Box–Cox transformation technique: a review, The Statistician, 41 (2), 169–178.
Sándor, Z. and Train, K. (2004), Quasi-random simulation of discrete choice models, Transportation Research Part B, 38 (4), 313–327.
Sándor, Z. and Wedel, M. (2002) Profile construction in experimental choice designs for mixed logit models, Marketing Science, 21 (4), 455–475.
Sándor, Z. and Wedel, M. (2005) Heterogeneous conjoint choice designs, Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 210–218.
Sándor, Z. and Wedel, M. (2001) Designing conjoint choice experiments using managers’ prior beliefs, Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 430–444.
Savage, L. J. (1954) The Foundations of Statistics, Wiley, London.
Scarpa, R., Campbell, D. and Hutchinson, G. (2005) Individual benefit estimates for rural landscape improvements: the role of sequential Bayesian design and response rationality in a choice study, Paper presented at the 14th Annual Conference of the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economics, Bremen.
Scarpa, R., Campbell, D. and Hutchinson, G. (2007) Benefit estimates for landscape improvements: sequential Bayesian design and respondents’ rationality in a choice experiment study, Land Economics, 83 (4), 617–634.
Scarpa, R., Ferrini, S. and Willis, K. G. (2005) Performance of error component models for status-quo effects in choice experiments, in Scarpa, R., Ferrini, S. and Willis, K. G. (eds.), Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics, Springer, Dordrecht, 247–274.
Scarpa, R., Gilbride, T. J., Campbell, D. and Hensher, D. A. (2009) Modelling attribute non-attendance in choice experiments for rural landscape valuation, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 36 (2), 151–174.
Scarpa, R. and Rose, J. M. (2008) Designs efficiency for non-market valuation with choice modelling: how to measure it, what to report and why, Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 52 (3), 253–282.
Scarpa, R., Thiene, M. and Hensher, D. A. (2010) Monitoring choice task attribute attendance in non-market valuation of multiple park management services: does it matter?, Land Economics, 86 (4), 817–839, Waikato Management School, The University of Waikato.
Scarpa, R., Thiene, M. and Hensher, D. A. (2012) Preferences for tap water attributes within couples: an exploration of alternative mixed logit parameterizations, Water Resources Research Journal, 48 (1), 1–11, .
Scarpa, R., Thiene, M. and Marangon, F. (2008) Using flexible taste distributions to value collective reputation for environmentally-friendly production methods, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56, 145–162.
Scarpa, R., Thiene, M. and Train, K. (2008) Utility in willingness to pay space: a tool to address confounding random scale effects in destination choice to the Alps, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 90 (4), 994–1010. (See also Appendix: Utility in WTP space: a tool to address confounding random scale effects in destination choice to the Alps. Available at: .).
Scarpa, R., Willis, K. G. and Acutt, M. (2004) Individual-specific welfare measures for public goods: a latent class approach to residential customers of Yorkshire Water, in Koundouri, P. (ed.), Econometrics Informing Natural Resource Management, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
Schade, J. and Baum, M. (2007) Reactance or acceptance? Reactions towards the introduction of road pricing, Transportation Research Part A, 41 (1), 41–48.
Schade, J. and Schlag, B. (eds.) (2003) Acceptability of Transport Pricing Strategies, Elsevier, Oxford.
Schwanen, T. and Ettema, D. (2009) Coping with unreliable transportation when collecting children: examining parents’ behavior with cumulative prospect theory, Transportation Research Part A, 43 (5), 511–525.
Senna, L. A. D. S. (1994) The influence of travel time variability on the value of time, Transportation, 21 (2), 203–228.
Seror, V. (2007) Fitting observed and theoretical choices – women’s choices about prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome, Health Economics, 14 (2), 161–167.
Shafer, G. (1976) A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton University Press.
Sillano, M. and Ortúzar, J. de D. (2005) Willingness-to-pay estimation with mixed logit models: some new evidence, Environment and Planning A, 37 (5), 525–550.
Simon, H. (1978) Rational decision making in organisations, American Economic Review, 69 (4), 493–513.
Simonson, I. and Tversky, A. (1992) Choice in context: tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion, Journal of Marketing Research, 29 (3): 281–295.
Slovic, P. (1987) Perception of risk, Science, New Series, 236 (4799), 280–285.
Slovic, P. (1995) The construction of preference, American Psychologist, 50, 364–371.
Small, K. A. (1992) Using the revenues from congestion pricing, Transportation, 19 (3), 359–381.
Small, K. A., Noland, R. B., Chu, X. and Lewis, D. (1999) Valuation of travel-time savings and predictability in congested conditions for highway user-cost estimation, NCHRP Report 431, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
Smith, V. K. and Van Houtven, G. (1998) Non-market valuation and the household, Resources for the Future, Discussion Paper 98–31, Washington, DC.
Sobol, I. M. (1967) Distribution of points in a cube and approximate evaluation of integrals, USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 7 (4), 784–802.
Sonnier, G., Ainslie, A. and Otter, T. (2003) The influence of brand image and product style on consumer brand valuations, Working Paper, Anderson Graduate School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
Sonnier, G., Ainslie, A. and Otter, T. (2007) Heterogeneity distributions of willingness-to-pay in choice models, Quantitative Marketing Economics, 5 (3), 313–331.
Starmer, C. (2000) Developments in non-expected utility theory: the hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk, Journal of Economic Literature, 38, 332–382.
Starmer, C. and Sugden, R. (1993) Testing for juxtaposition and event splitting effects, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 6, 235–254.
Steimetz, (2008) Defensive driving and the external costs of accidents and travel delays, Transportation Research Part B, 42 (9), 703–724.
Steimetz, S. and Brownstone, D. (2005) Estimating commuters’ ‘value of time’ with noisy data: a multiple imputation approach, Transportation Research Part B, 39 (7), 565–591.
Stewart, M. B. (2004) A comparison of semiparametric estimators for the ordered response model, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 49, 555–573.
Stewart, N., Chater, N., Stott, H. P. and Reimers, S. (2003) Prospect relativity: how choice options influence decision under risk, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 23–46.
Stopher, P. R. and Lisco, T. (1970) Modelling travel demand: a disaggregate behavioral approach, issues and applications, Transportation Research Forum Proceedings, 195–214.
Stott, H. P. (2006) Cumulative prospect theory’s functional menagerie, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 32 (2), 101–130.
Street, D., Bunch, D. and Moore, B. (2001) Optimal designs for 2k paired comparison experiments, Communications in Statistics – Theory and Method, 30, 2149–2171.
Street, D. J. and Burgess, L. (2004) Optimal and near-optimal pairs for the estimation of effects in 2-level choice experiments, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 118, 185–199.
Street, D. J., Burgess, L. and Louviere, J. J. (2005) Quick and easy choice sets: contructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiments, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22, 459–470.
Sugden, R. (2005) Anomalies and stated preference techniques: a framework for a discussion of coping strategies, Environmental and Resource Economics, 32, 1–12.
Sundstrom, G. A. (1987) Information search and decision making: the effects of information displays, Acta Psychologica, 65, 165–179.
Svenson, O. (1998) The perspective from behavioral decision theory on modelling travel choice, in Garling, T., Laitila, T. and Westin, K. (eds.), Theoretical Foundations of Travel Choice Modelling, Elsevier, Oxford, 141–172.
Svenson, O. and Malmsten, N. (1996) Post-decision consolidation over time as a function of gain or loss of an alternative, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 37 (3), 302–311.
Swait, J. (1994) A structural equation model of latent segmentation and product choice for cross-sectional revealed preference choice data, Journal of Retail and Consumer Services, 1 (2), 77–89.
Swait, J. (2001) A non-compensatory choice model incorporating attribute cut-offs, Transportation Research Part B, 35 (10), 903–928.
Swait, J. (2009) Choice models based on mixed discrete/continuous PDFs, Transportation Research Part B, 43 (7), 766–783.
Swait, J. and Adamowicz, W. (1996) The effect of choice environment and task demands on consumer behaviour: discriminating between contribution and confusion, Working Paper, Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta.
Swait, J. and Adamowicz, W. (2001a) The influence of task complexity on consumer choice: a latent class model of decision strategy switching, Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 135–148.
Swait, J. and Adamowicz, W. (2001b) Choice environment, market complexity, and consumer behavior: a theoretical and empirical approach for incorporating decision complexity into models of consumer choice, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 49, 1–27.
Swait, J., Adamowicz, W. and van Buren, M. (2004) Choice and temporal welfare impacts: incorporating history into discrete choice models, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 47, 94–116.
Swait, J. and Louviere, J. J. (1993) The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and use of multinomial logit models, Journal of Marketing Research, 30, 305–314.
Swait, J., Louviere, J. J. and Williams, M. (1994) A sequential approach to exploiting the combined strengths of SP and RP data: application to freight shipper choice, Transportation, 21, 135–152.
Swait, J. and Stacey, E. C. (1996) Consumer brand assessment and assessment confidence in models of longitudinal choice behavior, Paper presented at the 1996 INFORMS Marketing Science Conference, March 7–10, Gainesville, FL.
Temme, D., Paulssen, M. and Dannewald, T. (2008) Incorporating latent variables into discrete choice models: a simultaneous estimation approach using SEM software, Business Research, 1, 220–237.
Terza, J. (1985) Ordinal probit: generalisation, Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods, 14 (1), 1–11.
Thaler, R. (1999) Mental accounting matters, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 183–206.
Thiene, M. and Scarpa, R. (2009) Deriving and testing efficient estimates of WTP distributions in destination choice models, Environmental and Resource Economics, 44, 379–395.
Thurstone, L. L. (1927) A law of comparative judgment, Psychological Review, 34, 278–286.
Thurstone, L. L. (1945) The prediction of choice, Psychometrika, 10, 237–253.
Toner, J. P., Clark, S. D., Grant-Muller, S. M. and Fowkes, A. S. (1998) Anything you can do, we can do better: a provocative introduction to a new approach to stated preference design, WCTR Proceedings, 107–120, Antwerp.
Toner, J. P., Wardman, M. and Whelan, G. (1999) Testing recent advances in stated preference design, Proceedings of the European Transport Conference, Cambridge.
Train, K. (1978) A validation test for a disaggregate mode choice model, Transportation Research, 12, 167–173.
Train, K. (1997) Mixed logit models for recreation demand, in Kling, C. and Herriges, J. (eds.), Valuing the Environment Using Recreation Demand Models, Edward Elgar, New York.
Train, K. (2000) Halton sequences for mixed logit, Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
Train, K. (2003, 2009) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, Cambridge University Press.
Train, K. and Revelt, D. (2000) Customer-specific taste parameters and mixed logit, Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley. Available at: .
Train, K. and Weeks, M. (2005) Discrete choice models in preference space and willing to-pay space, in Scarpa, R. and Alberini, A. (eds.), Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics, Springer, Dordrecht, 1–16.
Train, K. and Wilson, W. (2008) Estimation on stated-preference experiments constructed from revealed-preference choice, Transportation Research Part B, 40 (2), 191–203.
Truong, T. P. and Hensher, D. A. (2012) Linking discrete choice to continuous demand models within a computable general equilibrium framework, Transportation Research Part B, 46 (9), 1177–1201.
Tuffin, B. (1996) On the use of low-discrepancy sequences in Monte Carlo methods, Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, 2 (4), 295–320.
Tukey, J. W. (1957) The comparative anatomy of transformations, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 28, 602–632.
Tukey, J. W. (1962) The future of data analysis, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 33 (1), 13.
Tversky, A. and Fox, C. (1995) Weighing risk and uncertainty, Psychological Reviews, 102 (2), 269–283.
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice, Science, 211 (4), 453–458.
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1992) Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representations of uncertainty, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5 (4), 297–323.
Tversky, A. and Koehler, D. (1994) Support theory: a nonextensional representation of subjective probability, Psychological Review, 1010, 547–567.
Tversky, A. and Simonson, I. (1993) Context-dependent preferences, Management Science, 39 (10), 1179–89.
Tversky, A., Slovic, P. and Kahneman, D. (1990) The causes of preference reversal, American Economic Review, 80 (1), 204–217.
Ubbels, B. and Verhoef, E. (2006) Acceptability of road pricing and revenue use in the Netherlands, European Transport/Trasporti Europei, 32, 69–94.
Uebersax, J. (1999) Probit latent class analysis with dichotomous or ordered category measures: conditional independence/dependence models, Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 283–297.
Van Amelsfort, D. H. and Bliemer, M. C. J. (2005) Uncertainty in travel conditions related travel time and arrival time: some findings from a choice experiment, Proceedings of the European Transport Conference (ETC), Strassbourg.
van de Kaa, E. J. (2008) Extended prospect theory, TRAIL Research School, Delft.
Verlegh, P. W., Schifferstein, H. N. and Wittink, D. R. (2002) Range and number-of-levels effects in derived and stated measures of attribute importance, Marketing Letters, 13, 41–52.
Vermeulen, B., Goos, P. and Vandeboek, M. (2008) Models and optimal designs for conjoint choice experiments including a no-choice option, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25 (2), 94–103.
Vermuelen, F. (2002) Collective household models: principles and main results, Journal of Economic Surveys, 16, 533–564.
Viney, R., Savage, E. and Louviere, J. J. (2005) Empirical investigation of experimental design properties of discrete choice experiments, Health Economics, 14 (4), 349–362.
von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1947) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press, 2nd edn.
Vuong, Q. H. (1989) Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses, Econometrica, 57 (1989), 307–333.
Wakker, P. P. (2008) Explaining the characteristics of the power (CRRA) utility family, Health Economics, 17 (12), 1329–1344.
Walker, J. L. and Ben-Akiva, M. E. (2002) Generalized random utility model, Math Soc. Sc., 43 (3), 303–343.
Walker, J. L., Ben-Akiva, M. and Bolduc, D. (2007) Identification of parameters in normal error component logit-mixture (NECLM) models, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22 (6), 1095–1125.
Wang, X. and Hickernell, F. J. (2000) Randomized Halton sequences, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 32 (7–8), 887–899.
Wardman, M. (2001) A review of British evidence on time and service quality valuations, Transportation Research Part E, 37 (2–3), 107–128.
Watson, S. M., Toner, J. P., Fowkes, A. S. and Wardman, M. R. (2000) Efficiency properties of orthogonal stated preference designs, in Ortúzar, J. de D. (ed.), Stated Preference Modelling Techniques, PTRC Education and Research Services Ltd, 91–101.
Williams, H. C. W. L. (1977) On the formation of travel demand models and economic evaluation measures of user benefit, Environment and Planning Part A, 9 (3), 285–344.
Williams, R. (2006) Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables, Stata Journal, 6 (1), 58–82.
Wilson, A. G., Hawkins, A. F., Hill, G. J. and Wagon, D. J. (1969) Calibrating and testing of the SELNEC transport model, Regional Studies, 3(3), 340–345.
Winiarski, M. (2003) Quasi-Monte Carlo derivative valuation and reduction of simulation bias, MSc Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm.
Wong, S. K. M., and Wang, Z. W. (1993) Qualitative measures of ambiguity, in Hackerman, D. and Mamdani, A. (eds.), Proceedings of The Ninth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 443–450.
Wooldridge, J. (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Yanez, M. F., Raveau, S., Rojas, M. and Ortúzar, J. de D. (2009) Modelling and forecasting with latent variables in discrete choice panel models, Proceedings of the European Transport Conference, Noordwijk Conference Centre, Leeuwenhorst.
Yanez, M. F., Bahamonde-Birke, F., Raveau, S. and Ortúzar, J. de D. (2010) The role of tangible attributes in hybrid discrete choice models, Proceedings of the European Transport Conference, Glasgow.
Yanez, M. F., Raveau, S. and Ortúzar, J. de D. (2010). Inclusion of latent variables in mixed logit models: modelling and forecasting, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 44 (9), 744–753.
Yoon, S.-O. and Simonson, I. (2008) Choice set configuration as a determinant of preference attribution and strength, Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 324–336.
Yu, J., Goos, P. and Vandeboek, M. (2006) The importance of attribute interactions in conjoint choice design and modeling, Department of Decision Sciences and Information Management Working Paper 0601.
Yu, J., Goos, P. and Vandeboek, M. (2008) A comparison of different Bayesian design criteria to compute efficient conjoint choice experiments, Department of Decision Sciences and Information Management Working Paper 0817.
Yu, J., Goos, P. and Vandeboek, M. (2009) Efficient conjoint choice designs in the presence of respondent heterogeneity, Marketing Science, 28 (1), 122–135.
Zavoina, R. and McElvey, W. (1975) A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, Summer, 103–120.
Zeelenberg, M. (1999) The use of crying over spilled milk: a note on the rationality and functionality of regret, Philosophical Psychology, 12 (3), 325–340.
Zeelenberg, M. and Pieters, R. (2007) A theory of regret regulation 1.0, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17 (1), 3–18.