Andrew, N. R., Hart, R. A., Jung, M.-P., Hemmings, Z. and Terblanche, J. S. (2013). Can temperate insects take the heat? A case study of the physiological and behavioural responses in a common ant, Iridomyrmex purpureus (Formicidae), with potential climate change. Journal of Insect Physiology, 59, 870–880.Google Scholar

Arnan, X., Rodrigo, A. and Retana, J. (2007). Uncoupling the effects of shade and food resources of vegetation on Mediterranean ants: an experimental approach at the community level. Ecography, 30, 161–172.Google Scholar

Bale, M. T., Zettler, J. A., Robinson, B. A., Spira, T. P. and Allen, C. R. (2003). Yellow jackets may be an underestimated component of an ant-seed mutualism. Southeastern Naturalist, 2, 609–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Banschbach, V. S., Yeamans, R., Brunelle, A., Gulka, A. and Holmes, M. (2012). Edge effects on community and social structure of northern temperate deciduous forest ants. Psyche, 2012, 548260.Google Scholar

Beattie, A. J. (1978). Plant-animal interactions affecting gene flow in Viola. In The Pollination of Flowers by Insects, ed. Richards, A. J. London: Academic Press, pp. 151–164.Google Scholar

Beattie, A. J. and Culver, D. C. (1981). The guild of myrmecochores in the herbaceous flora of West Virginia forests. Ecology, 62, 107–115.Google Scholar

Beattie, A. J. and Hughes, L. (2002). Ant-plant interactions. In Plant-Animal Interactions: An Evolutionary Approach, ed. Herrera, C. M. and Pellmyr, O. Oxford: Blackwell Science, pp. 211–235.Google Scholar

Bednar, D. M. (2010). Pachycondyla (=Brachyponera) chinensis Predation on Reticuletermes virginicus and Competition with Aphaenogaster rudis. Master of Science Thesis, North Carolina State University, USA.Google Scholar

Bednar, D. M. and Silverman, J. (2011). Use of termites, Reticulitermes virginicus, as a springboard in the invasive success of a predatory ant, Pachycondyla (=Brachyponera) chinensis. Insectes Sociaux, 58, 459–467.Google Scholar

Bertelsmeier, C., Guenard, B. and Courchamp, F. (2013). Climate change may boost the invasion of the Asian needle ant. PLoS ONE, 8, e75438.Google Scholar

Bertelsmeier, C., Luque, G. M., Hoffmann, B. D. and Courchamp, F. (2015). Worldwide ant invasions under climate change. Biodiversity Conservation, 24, 117–128.Google Scholar

Bond, W. and Slingsby, P. (1984). Ant-plant mutalism: the Argentine ant (Iridomyrmex Humilis) and myrmecochorous Proteaceae. Ecology, 65, 1031–1037.Google Scholar

Bono, J. M. and Heithaus, E. R. (2002). Population consequences of changes in ant-seed mutualism in Sanguinaria canadensis. Insectes Sociaux, 49, 320–325.Google Scholar

Boyd, R. (2001). Ecological benefits of myrmecochory for the endangered chaparral shrub Fremontodendron decumbens (Sterculiaceae). American Journal of Botany, 88, 234–241.Google Scholar

Brew, C. R., O’Dowd, D. J. and Rae, I. D. (1989). Seed dispersal by ants: behaviour-releasing compounds in elaiosomes. Oecologia, 80, 490–497.Google Scholar

Bronstein, J. L., Alarcon, R. and Geber, M. (2006). The evolution of plant-insect mutualisms. New Phytologist, 172, 412–428.Google Scholar

Brook, B. W., Sodhi, N. S. and Bradshaw, C. J. A. (2008). Synergies among extinction drivers under global change. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23, 453–460.Google Scholar

Brown, D. G., Johnson, K. M., Loveland, T. R. and Theobald, D. M. (2005). Rural land-use trends in the conterminous United States. Ecological Applications, 15, 1851–1863.Google Scholar

Brunet, J. and von Oheimb, G. (1998). Migration of vascular plants to secondary woodlands in southern Sweden. Journal of Ecology, 86, 429–438.Google Scholar

Bulow-Olsen, A. (1984). Diplochory in Viola: a possible relation between seed dispersal and soil seed bank. American Midland Naturalist, 112, 251–260.Google Scholar

Cain, M. L., Damman, H. and Muir, A. (1998). Seed dispersal and the Holocene migration of woodland herbs. Ecological Monographs, 68, 325–347.Google Scholar

Canner, J. E., Dunn, R. R., Giladi, I. and Gross, K. (2012). Redispersal of seeds by a keystone ant augments the spread of common wildflowers. Acta Oecologica, 40, 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carney, S. E., Byerley, M. B. and Holway, D. A. (2003). Invasive Argentine ants (Linepithema humile) do not replace native ants as seed dispersers of Dendromecon rigida (Papaveraceae) in California, USA. Oecologia, 135, 576–582.Google Scholar

Caut, S., Jowers, M. J., Cerda, X. and Boulay, R. (2013). Questioning the mutual benefits of myrmecochory: a stable isotope-based experimental approach. Ecological Entomology, 38, 390–399.Google Scholar

Chen, Y., Hansen, L. D. and Brown, J. J. (2002). Nesting sites of the carpenter ant, Camponotus vicinus (Mayr) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in northern Idaho. Environmental Entomology, 31, 1037–1042.Google Scholar

Christian, C. E. (2001). Consequences of biological invasions reveal importance of mutualism for plant communities. Nature, 413, 576–582.Google Scholar

Clark, R. E. and King, J. R. (2012). The ant, Aphaenogaster picea, benefits from plant elaiosomes when insect prey is scarce. Environmental Entomology, 41, 1405–1408.Google Scholar

Dahlgren, J. P., von Zeipel, H. and Ehrlen, J. (2007). Variation in vegetative and flowering phenology in a forest herb caused by environmental heterogeneity. American Journal of Botany, 94, 1570–1576.Google Scholar

De Marco, B. and Cognato, A. I. (2016). A multiple gene phylogeny reveals polyphyly among eastern North American Aphaenogaster species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Zoologica Scripta, DOI: 10.1111/zsc.12168.Google Scholar

Diamond, S. E., Nichols, L. M., McCoy, N., Hirsch, C., Pelini, S. L., Sanders, N. J., Ellison, A. M., Gotelli, N. J. and Dunn, R. R. (2012). A physiological trait-based approach to predicting the responses of species to experimental climate warming. Ecology, 93, 2305–2312.Google Scholar

Didham, R. K., Tylianakis, J. M., Gemmell, N. J., Rand, T. A. and Ewers, R. M. (2007). Interactive effects of habitat modification and species invasion on native species decline. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 22, 489–496.Google Scholar

Drummond, M. A. and Loveland, T. R. (2010). Land-use pressure and a transition to forest-cover loss in the eastern United States. Bioscience, 60, 286–298.Google Scholar

Duffy, D. C. and Meier, A. J. (1992). Do Appalachian herbaceous understories ever recover from clearcutting? Conservation Biology, 6, 196–201.Google Scholar

Eguchi, K. (2004). A survey on seed predation by omnivorous ants in the warm-temperate zone of Japan (Insecta, Hymnoptera, Formicidae). New Entomologist, 53, 7–18.Google Scholar

Fellers, J. H. (1989). Daily and seasonal activity in woodland ants. Oecologia, 78, 69–76.Google Scholar

Fischer, R. C., Richter, A., Hadacek, F. and Mayer, V. (2008). Chemical differences between seeds and elaiosomes indicate an adaptation to nutritional needs of ants. Oecologia, 155, 539–547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Flinn, K. M. and Vellend, M. (2005). Recovery of forest plant communities in post-agricultural landscapes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 3, 243–250.Google Scholar

Ford, W. M., Odom, R. H., Hale, P. E. and Chapman, B. R. (2000). Stand-age, stand characteristics, and landform effects on understory herbaceous communities in southern Appalachian cove-hardwoods. Biological Conservation, 93, 237–246.Google Scholar

Gammans, N., Bullock, J. J. and Schonrogge, K. (2005). Ant benefits in a seed dispersal mutualism. Oecologia, 146, 43–49.Google Scholar

Garnas, J. (2004). European fire ants on Mount Desert Island, Maine: population structure, mechanisms of competition and community impacts of Myrmica rubra L. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ecology and Environmental Sciences. Orono, Maine: University of Maine.Google Scholar

Giladi, I. (2006). Choosing benefits or partners: a review of the evidence for the evolution of myrmecochory. Oikos, 112, 481–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilliam, F. S. (2002). Effects of harvesting on herbaceous layer diversity of a central Appalachian hardwood forest in West Virginia, USA. Forest Ecology and Management, 155, 33–43.Google Scholar

Gilliam, F. S. (2007). The ecological significance of the herbaceous layer in temperate forest ecosystems. Bioscience, 57, 845–858.Google Scholar

Gomez, C. and Espadaler, X. (2013). An update of the world survey of myrmecochorous dispersal distances. Ecography, 36, 1193–1201.Google Scholar

Gomez, C. and Oliveras, J. (2003). Can the Argentine ant (Linepithema humile Mayr) replace native ants in myrmecochory? Acta Oecologia, 24, 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gorb, E. and Gorb, S. (2000). Effects of seed aggregation on the removal rates of elaiosome-bearing Chelidonium majus and Viola odorata seeds carried by Formica polyctena ants. Ecological Research, 15, 187–192.Google Scholar

Gorb, E. and Gorb, S. (2003). Seed Dispersal by Ants in a Deciduous Forest Ecosystem. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Gove, A. D., Majer, J. D. and Dunn, R. R. (2007). A keystone ant species promotes seed dispersal in “diffuse” mutualism. Oecologia, 153, 687–697.Google Scholar

Groden, E., Drummond, F. A., Garnas, J. and Franceour, A. (2005). Distribution of an invasive ant, Myrmica rubra (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), in Maine. Journal of Economic Entomology, 98, 1774–1784.Google Scholar

Guenard, B. and Dunn, R. R. (2010). A new (old), invasive ant in the hardwood forests of eastern North America and its potentially widespread impacts. PLoS ONE, 5, e11614.Google Scholar

Handel, S. N. (1976). Ecology of Carex pedunculata (Cyperaceae), a new North American myrmecochore. American Journal of Botany, 63, 1071–1079.Google Scholar

Handel, S. N. and Beattie, A. J. (1990). Seed dispersal by ants. Scientific American, 263, 76–83.Google Scholar

Handel, S. N., Fisch, S. B. and Schatz, G. E. (1981). Ants disperse a majority of herbs in a mesic forest community in New-York state. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 108, 430–437.Google Scholar

Harrelson, S. M. and Matlack, G. R. (2006). Influence of stand age and physical environment on the herb composition of second-growth forest, Strouds Run, Ohio, USA. Journal of Biogeography, 33, 1139–1149.Google Scholar

Heithaus, E. R. and Humes, M. (2003). Variation in communities of seed-dispersing ants in habitats with different disturbance in Knox County, Ohio. Ohio Journal of Science, 103, 89–97.Google Scholar

Hellmann, J. J., Byers, J. E., Bierwagen, B. G. and Dukes, J. S. (2008). Five potential consequences of climate change for invasive species. Conservation Biology, 22, 534–543.Google Scholar

Hölldobler, B. and Wilson, E. O. (1990). The Ants. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holway, D. A., Lach, L., Suarez, A. V., Tsutsui, N. D. and Case, T. J. (2002). The causes and consequences of ant invasions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 33, 181–233.Google Scholar

Jackson, B. C., Pitillo, J. D., Allen, H. L., Wentworth, T. R., Bullock, B. P. and Loftis, D. L. (2009). Species diversity and composition in old growth and second growth rich coves of the Southern Appalachian Mountains. Castanea, 74, 27–38.Google Scholar

Jacquemyn, H. and Brys, R. (2008). Effects of stand age on the demography of a temperate forest herb in post-agricultural forests. Ecology, 89, 3480–3489.Google Scholar

Jules, E. S. and Rathcke, B. J. (1999). Mechanisms of reduced Trillium recruitment along edges of old-growth forest. Conservation Biology, 13, 784–793.Google Scholar

Kalisz, S., Hanzawa, F. M., Tonsor, S. J., Thiede, D. A. and Voigt, S. (1999). Ant-mediated seed dispersal alters pattern of relatedness in a population of Trillium grandiflorum. Ecology, 80, 2620–2634.Google Scholar

Keller, L. and Passera, L. (1989). Size and fat-content of gynes in relation to the mode of colony founding in ants (Hymenoptera; Formicidae). Oecologia, 80, 236–240.Google Scholar

King, J. R. and Tschinkel, W. R. (2008). Experimental evidance that human impacts drive fire ant invasions and ecological change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 20339–20343.Google Scholar

King, J. R. and Tschinkel, W. R. (2013). Experimental evidence for weak effects of fire ants in a naturally invaded pine-savanna ecosystem. Ecological Entomology, 38, 68–75.Google Scholar

King, J. R. and Tschinkel, W. R. (2016). Experimental evidence that dispersal drives ant community assembly in human-altered ecosystems. Ecology, 97, 236–249.Google Scholar

King, J. R., Tschinkel, W. R. and Ross, K. G. (2009). A case study of human exacerbation of the invasive species problem: transport and establishment of polygyne fire ants in Tallahassee, Florida, USA. Biological Invasions, 11, 373–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, J. R., WarrenII, R. J. and Bradford, M. A. (2013). Social insects dominate eastern US temperate hardwood forest macroinvertebrate communities in warmer regions. PLoS ONE, 8, e75843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kjellsson, G. (1991). Seed fate in an ant-dispersed sedge, Carex pilulifera L.: recruitment and seedling survival in tests of models for spatial dispersion. Oecologia, 88, 435–443.Google Scholar

Kuriachan, I. and Vinson, S. B. (2000). A queen’s worker attractiveness influences her movement in polygynous colonies of the red imported fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in response to adverse temperature Environmental Entomology, 29, 943–949.Google Scholar

Lengyel, S., Gove, A. D., Latimer, A. M., Majer, J. D. and Dunn, R. B. (2009). Ants sow the seeds of global diversification in flowering plants. PLoS ONE, 4, e5480.Google Scholar

Lessard, J. P., Sackett, T. E., Reynolds, W. N., Fowler, D. A. and Sanders, N. J. (2010). Determinants of the detrital arthropod community structure: effects of temperature and resources along an environmental gradient. Oikos, 120, 333–343.Google Scholar

Lubertazzi, D. (2012). The biology and natural history of Aphaenogaster rudis. Psyche, 2012, 752815.Google Scholar

Mantyka-Pringle, C. S., Martin, T. G. and Rhodes, J. R. (2012). Interactions between climate and habitat loss effects on biodiversity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 18, 1239–1252.Google Scholar

Marshall, D. L., Beattie, A. J. and Bollenbacher, W. E. (1979). Evidence for diglycerides as attractants in an ant-seed interaction. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 5, 335–344.Google Scholar

Marussich, W. A. (2006). Testing myrmecochory from the ant’s perspective: the effects of Datura wrightii and D. discolor on queen survival and brood production in Pogonomyrmex californicus. Insectes Sociaux, 53, 403–411.Google Scholar

Matlack, G. R. (1993). Microenvironment variation within and among forest edge sites in the Eastern United-States. Biological Conservation, 66, 185–194.Google Scholar

Matlack, G. R. (1994a). Plant-species migration in a mixed-history forest landscape in Eastern North-America. Ecology, 75, 1491–1502.Google Scholar

Matlack, G.R. (1994b). Vegetation dynamics of the forest edges-trends in space and successional time. Journal of Ecology, 82, 113–123.Google Scholar

McGlynn, T. P. (1999). Non-native ants are smaller than related native ants. American Naturalist, 6, 690–699.Google Scholar

McLachlan, S. M. and Bazely, D. R. (2001). Recovery patterns of understory herbs and their use as indicators of deciduous forest regeneration. Conservation Biology, 15, 98–110.Google Scholar

Meier, A. J., Bratton, S. P. and Duffy, D. C. (1995). Possible ecological mechanisms for loss of vernal-herb diversity in logged eastern deciduous forests. Ecological Applications, 5, 935–946.Google Scholar

Mitchell, C. E., Turner, M. G. and Pearson, S. M. (2002). Effects of historical land use and forest patch size on myrmecochores and ant communities. Ecological Applications, 12, 1364–1377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morales, M. A. and Heithaus, E. R. (1998). Food from seed-dispersal mutualism shifts sex ratios in colonies of the ant Aphaenogaster rudis. Ecology, 79, 734–739.Google Scholar

Myers, J. A., Vellend, M., Gardescu, S. and Marks, P. L. (2004). Seed dispersal by white-tailed deer: implications for long-distance dispersal, invasion and migration of plants in eastern North America. Oecologia, 139, 35–44.Google Scholar

Nelder, M. P., Paysen, E. S., Zungoli, P. A. and Benson, E. P. (2006). Emergence of the introduced ant Pachycondyla chinensis (Formicidae: Ponerinae) as a public health threat in the southeastern United States. Journal of Medical Entomology, 43, 1094–1098.Google Scholar

Ness, J. H. (2004). Forest edges and fire ants alter the seed shadow of an ant-dispersed plant. Oecologia, 138, 228–454.Google Scholar

Ness, J. H. and Bronstein, J. L. (2004). The effects of invasive ants on the prospective ant mutualists. Biological Invasions, 6, 445–461.Google Scholar

Ness, J. H. and Morin, D. F. (2008). Forest edges and landscape history shape interactions between plants, seed-dispersing ants and seed predators. Biological Conservation, 141, 838–847.Google Scholar

Ness, J. H., Morin, D. F. and Giladi, I. (2009). Uncommon specialization in a mutualism between a temperate herbaceous plant guild and an ant: Are Aphaenogaster ants keystone mutualists? Oikos, 12, 1793–1804.Google Scholar

Ohnishi, Y., Suzuki, N., Katayama, N. and Teranishi, S. (2008). Seasonally different modes of seed dispersal in the prostrate annual, Chamaesyce maculata (L.) Small (Euphorbiaceae), with multiple overlapping generations. Ecological Research, 23, 299–305.Google Scholar

Pelini, S. L., Boudreau, M., McCoy, N., Ellison, A. M., Gotelli, N. J., Sanders, N. J. and Dunn, R. R. (2011). Effects of short-term warming on low and high latitude forest ant communities. Ecosphere, 2, 1–12.Google Scholar

Pelini, S. L., Diamond, S. E., MacLean, H. J., Ellison, A. M., Gotelli, N. J., Sanders, N. J. and Dunn, R. R. (2012). Common garden experiments reveal uncommon responses across temperatures, locations, and species of ants. Ecology and Evolution, 2, 3009–3015.Google Scholar

Peterson, C. J. and Campbell, J. E. (1993). Microsite differences and temporal change in plant communities of treefall pits and mounds in an old-growth forests. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 120, 451–460.Google Scholar

Pfeiffer, M., Huttenlocher, H. and Ayasse, M. (2010). Myrmecochorous plants use chemical mimicry to cheat seed-dispersing ants. Functional Ecology, 24, 545–555.Google Scholar

Porter, S. D. and Tschinkel, W. R. (1993). Fire ant thermal preferences: behavioral control of growth and metabolism. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 32, 321–329.Google Scholar

Prior, K. M., Robinson, J. M., Meadly Dunphy, S. A. and Frederickson, M. E. (2015). Mutualism between co-introduced species facilitates invasion and alters plant community structure. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pudlo, R. J., Beattie, A. J. and Culver, D. C. (1980). Population consequences of changes in ant-seed mutualism in Sanguinaria canadensis. Oecologia, 146, 32–37.Google Scholar

Rathcke, B. and Lacey, E.P. (1985). Phenological patterns of terrestrial plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 16, 179–214.Google Scholar

Rice, E. S. and Silverman, J. (2013). Propagule pressure and climate contribute to the displacement of Linepithema humile by Pachycondyla chinensis. PLoS ONE, 8, 856281.Google Scholar

Rico-Gray, V. and Oliveira, P. S. (2007). The Ecology and Evolution of Ant-Plant Interactions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Rodriguez-Cabal, M. A., Stuble, K. L., Guenard, B., Dunn, R. R. and Sanders, N. J. (2012). Disruption of ant-seed dispersal mutualisms by the invasive Asian needle ant (Pachycondyla chinensis). Biological Invasions, 14, 557–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rodriguez-Cabal, M. A., Stuble, K. L., Nunez, M. A. and Sanders, N. J. (2009). Quantitative analysis of the effects of the exotic Argentine ant on seed-dispersal mutualisms. Biology Letters, 5, 499–502.Google Scholar

Rowles, A. D. and O’Dowd, D. J. (2009). New mutualism for old: indirect disruption and direct facilitation of seed dispersal following Argentine ant invasion. Oecologia, 158, 709–716.Google Scholar

Rowles, A. D. and Silverman, J. (2010). Argentine ant invasion associated with loblolly pines in the Southeastern United States: minimal impacts but seasonally sustained. Environmental Entomology, 39, 1141–1150.Google Scholar

Sanders, N. J., Gotelli, N. J., Heller, N. E. and Gordon, D. M. (2003). Community disassembly by an invasive species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 2474–2477.Google Scholar

Sanders, N. J., Lessard, J. P., Fitzpatrick, M. C. and Dunn, R. R. (2007). Temperature, but not productivity or geometry, predicts elevational diversity gradients in ants across spatial grains. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 16, 640–649.Google Scholar

Servigne, P. and Detrain, C. (2008). Ant-seed interactions: combined effects of ant and plant species on seed removal patterns. Insectes Sociaux, 55, 220–230.Google Scholar

Singer, M. C. and Parmesan, C. (2010). Phenological asynchrony between herbivorous insects and their hosts: signal of climate change or pre-existing adaptive strategy? Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 365, 3161–3176.Google Scholar

Sorrells, J. S. and WarrenII, R. J. (2011). Ant-dispersed herb colonization lags behind forest re-establishment. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, 138, 77–84.Google Scholar

Staudt, A., Leidner, A. K., Howard, J., Brauman, K. A., Dukes, J. S., Hansen, L. J., Paukert, C., Sabo, J. and Solorzano, L. A. (2013). The added complications of climate change: understanding and managing biodiversity and ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11, 494–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stuble, K. L., Kirkman, L. K. and Carroll, C. R. (2010). Are red imported fire ants facilitators of native seed dispersal? Biological Invasions, 12, 1661–1669.Google Scholar

Stuble, K. L., Patterson, C. M., Rodriguez-Cabal, M. A., Ribbons, R. R., Dunn, R. R. and Sanders, N. J. (2014). Ant-mediated seed dispersal in a warmed world. PeerJ, 2, e286.Google Scholar

Stuble, K. L., Pelini, S. L., Diamon, S. E., Fowler, D. A., Dunn, R. R. and Sanders, N. J. (2013). Foraging by forest ants under experimental warming: a test at two sites. Ecology and Evolution, 3, 482–491.Google Scholar

Suarez, A. V., Bolger, D. T. and Case, T. J. (1998). Effects of fragmentation and invasion on native ant communities in a coastal Southern California. Ecology, 79, 2041–2056.Google Scholar

Talbot, M. (1966). Flights of the ant Aphaenogaster treatae. Kansas Entomological Society, 39, 67–77.Google Scholar

Theobald, D. M. (2005). Landscape patterns of exurban growth in the USA from 1980 to 2020. Ecology and Society, 10, 32.Google Scholar

Turner, K. M. and Frederickson, M. E. (2013). Signals can trump rewards in attracting seed-dispersing ants. PLoS ONE, 8, e71871.Google Scholar

Urban, M. C., Tewksbury, J. J. and Sheldon, K. S. (2012). On a collision course: competition and dispersal differences create no-analogue communities and cause extinctions during climate change. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 279, 2072–2080.Google Scholar

Walther, G. R., Post, E., Convey, P., Menzel, A., Parmesan, C., Beebee, T. J. C., Fromentin, J. M., Hoegh-Guldberg, O. and Bairlein, F. (2002). Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature, 416, 389–395.Google Scholar

Warren II, R. J., Bahn, V. and Bradford, M. A. (2011a). Temperature cues phenological synchrony in ant-mediated seed dispersal. Global Change Biology, 17, 2444–2454.Google Scholar

Warren II, R. J. and Bradford, M. A. (2013). Mutualism fails when climate response differs between interacting species. Global Change Biology, 20, 466–474.Google Scholar

Warren II, R . J. and Chick, L. (2013). Upward ant distribution shift corresponds with minimum, not maximum, temperature tolerance. Global Change Biology, 19, 2082–2088.Google Scholar

Warren II, R. J. and Giladi, I. (2014). Ant-mediated seed dispersal: a few ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) benefit many plants. Myrmecological News, 20, 129–140.Google Scholar

Warren II, R. J., Giladi, I. and Bradford, M.A. (2010). Ant-mediated seed dispersal does not facilitate niche expansion. Journal of Ecology, 98, 1178–1185.Google Scholar

Warren II, R. J., Giladi, I. and Bradford, M.A. (2012). Environmental heterogeneity and interspecific interactions influence occupancy be key seed-dispersing ants. Environmental Entomology, 41, 463–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Warren II, R.J., Giladi, I. and Bradford, M.A. (2014). Competition as a mechanism structuring mutualisms. Journal of Ecology, 102, 486–495.Google Scholar

Warren II, R. J., McAfee, P. and Bahn, V. (2011b). Ecological differentiation among key plant mutualists from a cryptic ant guild. Insectes Sociaux, 58, 505–512.Google Scholar

Warren II, R. J., McMillan, A., King, J. R., Chick, L. and Bradford, M. A. (2015a). Forest invader replaces predation but not dispersal services by a keystone species. Biological Invasions, 23, 3153–3162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Warren II, R. J., Pearson, S., Henry, S., Rossouw, K., Love, J.P., Olejniczak, M., Elliott, K. and Bradford, M.A. (2015b). Cryptic indirect effects of exurban edges on a woodland community. Ecosphere, 6, 218.Google Scholar

Whigham, D. E. (2004). Ecology of woodland herbs in temperate deciduous forests. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 35, 583–621.Google Scholar

Wike, L., Martin, F. D., Paller, M. H. and Nelson, E. A. (2010). Impact of forest seral stage on use of ant communities for rapid assessment of terrestrial ecosystem health. Journal of Insect Science, 10, 1–16.Google Scholar

Wittman, S. E., Sanders, N. J., Ellison, A. M., Jules, E. S., Ratchford, J. S. and Gotelli, N. J. (2010). Species interactions and thermal constraints on ant community structure. Oikos, 119, 551–559.Google Scholar

Zelikova, T. J., Dunn, R. R. and Sanders, N. J. (2008). Variation in seed dispersal along an elevational gradient in Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Acta Oecologica, 34, 155–162.Google Scholar

Zelikova, T. J., Sanders, D. and Dunn, R. R. (2011). The mixed effects of experimental ant removal on seedling distribution, belowground invertebrates, and soil nutrients. Ecosphere, 2, 1–14.Google Scholar

Zettler, J. A., Spira, T. P. and Allen, C. R. (2001). Ant-seed mutualisms: can red imported fire ants source the relationship? Biological Conservation, 101, 249–253.Google Scholar

Zhou, H., Chen, J. and Chen, F. (2007). Ant-mediated seed dispersal contributes to the local spatial pattern and genetic structure of Globba lancangensis (Zingiberaceae). Journal of Heredity, 98, 317–324.Google Scholar

Ab’Sáber, A. N. (1999). Dossiê Nordeste seco. Estudos Avançados, 13, 1–59.Google Scholar

Ahrends, A., Burgess, N. D., Milledge, S. A. H., Bulling, M. T., Fisher, B., Smart, J. C. R., Clarke, G. P., Mhoro, B. E. and Lewis, S. L. (2010). Predictable waves of sequential forest degradation and biodiversity loss spreading from an African city. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 14556–14561.Google Scholar

Andersen, A. N. (1988). Dispersal distance as a benefit of myrmecochory. Oecologia, 75, 507–511.Google Scholar

Andersen, A. N. and Morrison, S. (1998). Myrmecochory in Australia’s seasonal tropics: effects of disturbance on distance dispersal. Australian Journal of Ecology, 23, 483–491.Google Scholar

Anderson-Teixeira, K. J., Miller, A. D., Mohan, J. E., Hudiburg, T. W., Duval, B. D. and DeLucia, E. H. (2013). Altered dynamics of forest recovery under a changing climate. Global Change Biology, 19, 2001–2021.Google Scholar

Andrade-Lima, D. (1989). Plantas da Caatinga. Rio de Janeiro: Academia Brasileira de Ciências.Google Scholar

Aranda-Rickert, A. and Fracchia, S. (2012). Are subordinate ants the best seed dispersers? Linking dominance hierarchies and seed dispersal ability in myrmecochory interaction. Arthropod-Plant Interactions, 6, 297–306.Google Scholar

Arcoverde, G. B. (2012). Efeitos de perturbações antrópicas na proteção de sementes e estabelecimento de plântulas em ninhos de Dinoponera quadriceps Santschi (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) no semi-árido nordestino. Master thesis, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife.Google Scholar

Barroso, G. M., Morim, M. P., Peixoto, A. L. and Ichaso, C. L. F. (1999). Frutos e sementes: morfologia aplicada à sistemática de dicotiledôneas. Viçosa: Universidade Federal de Viçosa.Google Scholar

Beattie, A. J. (1985). The evolutionary ecology of ant-plant mutualisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Beattie, A. J. and Culver, D. C. (1981). The guild of myrmecochores in the herbaceous flora of West Virginia forests. Ecology, 62, 107–115.Google Scholar

Berg, R. Y. (1975). Myrmecochorous plants in Australia and their dispersal by ants. Australian Journal of Botany, 62, 714–722.Google Scholar

Bond, W. and Slingsby, P. (1983). Seed dispersal by ants in Cape shrublands and its evolutionary implications. South Africa Journal of Science, 79, 231–233.Google Scholar

Boyd, R. S. (2001). Ecological benefits of myrmecochory for the endangered chaparral shrub Fremontodendron decumbens (Sterculiaceae). American Journal of Botany, 88, 234–241.Google Scholar

Christianini, A. V, Mayhé-Nunes, A. J. and Oliveira, P. S. (2007). The role of ants in the removal of non-myrmecochorous diaspores and seed germination in a Neotropical savanna. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 23, 343–351.Google Scholar

Davidar, P., Sahoo, S., Mammen, P. C. et al. (2010). Assessing the extent and causes of forest degradation in India: where do we stand? Biological Conservation, 143, 2937–2944.Google Scholar

Farwig, N. and Berens, D. G. (2012). Imagine a world without seed dispersers: a review of threats, consequences and future directions. Basic and Applied Ecology, 13, 109–115.Google Scholar

García-Valdés, R., Svenning, J. C., Zavala, M. A., Purves, D. W. and Araújo, M. B. (2015). Evaluating the combined effects of climate and land-use change on tree species distributions. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52, 902–912.Google Scholar

Gariglio, M. A., Sampaio, E. V. S. B., Cestaro, L. A. and Kageyama, P. Y. (2010). Uso sustentável e conservação dos recursos florestais da caatinga. Brasília: Serviço Florestal Brasileiro.Google Scholar

Garrido, J. L., Rey, P. J., Cerdá, X. and Herrera, C. M. (2002). Geographical variation in diaspore traits of an ant-dispersed plant (Helleborus foetidus): are ant community composition and diaspore traits correlated? Journal of Ecology, 90, 446–455.Google Scholar

Gibb, H., Sanders, N. J., Dunn, R. R. et al. (2015). Climate mediates the effects of disturbance on ant assemblage structure. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 282, 20150418.Google Scholar

Gorb, E. and Gorb, S. (2003). Seed dispersal by ants in a deciduous forest ecosystem. Mechanisms, strategies, adaptation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gove, A. D., Majer, J. D. and Dunn, R. R. (2007). A keystone ant species promotes seed dispersal in a “diffuse” mutualism. Oecologia, 153, 687–697.Google Scholar

Griz, L. M. S. and Machado, I. C. (2001). Fruiting phenology and seed dispersal syndromes in Caatinga, a tropical dry Forest in the Northeast of Brazil. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 17, 303–321.Google Scholar

Hanzawa, F. M., Beattie, A. J. and Culver, D. C. (1988). Directed dispersal: demographic analysis of an ant-seed mutualism. American Naturalist, 131, 1–13.Google Scholar

Heithaus, E. R. (1981). Seed predation by rodents on three ant-dispersed plants. Ecology, 62, 136–145.Google Scholar

Higashi, S., Tsuyuzaki, S. and Ohara, I. F. (1989). Adaptive advantages of ant-dispersed seeds in the myrmecochorous plant Trillium tschonoskii (Liliaceae). Oikos, 54, 389–394.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, B. D. and Andersen, A. N. (2003) Responses of ants to disturbance in Australia with particular reference to functional groups. Austral Ecology, 28, 444–464.Google Scholar

Hughes, L. and Westoby, M. (1992). Fate of seeds adapted for dispersal by ants in Australian sclerophyll vegetation. Ecology, 73, 1285–1299.Google Scholar

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, 1985 (1985). Atlas Nacional do Brasil: Região Nordeste. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE.Google Scholar

Jentsch, A., Kreyling, J., Boettcher-Treschkow, J. and Beierkuhnlein, C. (2009). Beyond gradual warming: extreme weather events alter flower phenology of European grassland and heath species. Global Change Biology, 15, 837–849.Google Scholar

Laurance, W. F. and Peres, C.A. (2006). Emerging threats to tropical forests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Leal, I. R., Filgueiras, B. K. C., Gomes, J. P. and Andersen, A. N. (2012). Effects of habitat fragmentation on ant richness and functional composition in Atlantic Forest of northeastern Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21, 1687–1701.Google Scholar

Leal, I. R., Leal, L. C. and Andersen, A. N. (2015). The benefits of myrmecochory: a matter of stature. Biotropica, 47, 281–285.Google Scholar

Leal, I. R. and Oliveira, P. S. (1998). Interactions between fungus-growing ants (Attini), fruits and seeds in cerrado vegetation in Southeast Brazil. Biotropica, 30, 170–178.Google Scholar

Leal, I. R., Silva, J. M. C., Tabarelli, M. and Lacher, T. E. (2005). Changing the course of biodiversity conservation in the Caatinga of Northeastern Brazil. Conservation Biology, 19, 701–706.Google Scholar

Leal, I. R., Wirth, R. and Tabarelli, M. (2007). Seed dispersal by ants in the semi-arid Caatinga of North-east Brazil. Annals of Botany, 99, 885–894.Google Scholar

Leal, L. C., Andersen, A. N. and Leal, I. R. (2014b). Anthropogenic disturbance reduces seed dispersal services for myrmecochorous plants in the Brazilian Caatinga. Oecologia, 174, 173–181.Google Scholar

Leal, L. C., Lima-Neto, M. C., Oliveira, A. F. M., Andersen, A. N. and Leal, I. R. (2014a). Myrmecochores can target high-quality disperser ants: variation in elaiosome traits and ant preferences for myrmecochorous Euphorbiaceae in Brazilian Caatinga. Oecologia, 174, 493–500.Google Scholar

Lengyel, S., Gove, A. D., Latimer, A. M., Majer, J. D. and Dunn, R. R. (2009). Ants sow the seeds of global diversification in flowering plants. PLoS ONE, 4(5), e5480.Google Scholar

Levey, D. J. and Byrne, M. M. (1993). Complex ant-plant interactions: rain forest ants as secondary dispersers and post-dispersal seed predators. Ecology, 74, 1802–1812.Google Scholar

Lôbo, D., Tabarelli, M. and Leal, I. R. (2011). Realocation of Croton sonderianus (Euphorbiaceae) seeds by Pheidole fallax Mayr (Formicidae): a case of post-dispersal seed protection by ants. Neotropical Entomology, 40, 440–444.Google Scholar

Lorenzi, H. (1998). Árvores brasileiras: manual de identificação e cultivo de plantas arbóreas nativas do Brasil. Nova Odessa: Editora Plantarum.Google Scholar

Magrin, G. O., Marengo, J. A., Boulanger, J. P. et al. (2014). Central and South America. In Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part B: regional aspects. contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, eds. Barros, V. R., Field, C.B., Dokken, D. J., Mastrandrea, M. D., Mach, K. J., Bilir, T. E., Chatterjee, M., Ebi, K. L., Estrada, Y. O., Genova, R. C., Girma, B., Kissel, E. S., Levy, A. N., MacCracken, S., Mastrandrea, P. R. and White, L. L.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1499–1566.Google Scholar

Manzaneda, A. J. and Rey, P. J. (2008). Geographic variation in seed removal of a myrmecochorous herb: influence of variation in functional guild and species composition of disperser assemblage through spatial and temporal scale. Ecography, 31, 583–591.Google Scholar

Manzaneda, A. J. and Rey, P. J. (2012). Geographical and interspecific variation and the nutrient-enrichment hypothesis as an adaptive advantage of myrmecochory. Ecography, 35, 322–332.Google Scholar

Marini, L., Bruun, H. H., Heikkinen, R. K., Helm, A., Honnay, O., Krauss, J., Kuhn, I., Lindborg, R., Partel, M. and Bommarco, R. (2012). Traits related to species persistence and dispersal explain changes in plant communities subjected to habitat loss. Diversity and Distributions, 18, 890–908.Google Scholar

Martorell, C. and Peters, E. M. (2005). The measurement of chronic disturbance and its effects on the threatened cactus Mammilaria pectinifera. Biological Conservation, 124, 199–207.Google Scholar

Medeiros, S. S., Cavalcante, A. M. B., Perez Marin, A. M., Tinôco, L. B. M., Salcedo, I. H. and Pinto, T. F. (2012). Sinopse do censo demográfico para o semiárido brasileiro. Campina Grande: Instituto Nacional de Seminário.Google Scholar

Ministério do Meio Ambiente (2011). Monitoramento do desmatamento nos biomas brasileiros por satélite: monitoramento do bioma Caatinga de 2008 a 2009. Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente.Google Scholar

Moro, M. F., Lughadha, E. N., Filer, D. L., Araújo, F. S. and Martins, F. R. (2014). A catalogue of the vascular plants of the Caatinga Phytogeographical Domain: A synthesis of floristic and phytosociological surveys. Phytotaxa, 160, 1–30.Google Scholar

Ness, J. H., Bronstein, J., Andersen, A. N. and Holland, J. N. (2004). Ant body size predicts dispersal distance of ant-adapted seeds: implications of small-ant invasions. Ecology, 85, 1244–1250.Google Scholar

Ness, J. H., Morin, F. and Giladi, I. (2009). Uncommon specialization in mutualism between a temperate herbaceous plant guild and the ant: are Aphaenogaster ants keystone mutualistics? Oikos, 118, 1793–1804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oliveira, F. M. P., Ribeiro-Neto, J. D., Andersen, A. N. and Leal, I. R. (2017). Chronic anthropogenic disturbance as a secondary driver of ant community structure: interactions with soil type in Brazilian Caatinga. Environmental Conservation, 44, 115–123.Google Scholar

Passos, L. and Oliveira, P. S. (2002). Ants affect the distribution and performance of Clusia criuva seedlings, a primarily bird-dispersed rainforest tree. Journal of Ecology, 90, 517–528.Google Scholar

Passos, L. and Oliveira, P. S. (2003). Interactions between ants, fruits and seeds in a restinga forest in south-eastern Brazil. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 19, 261–270.Google Scholar

Passos, L. and Oliveira, P. S. (2004). Interaction between ants and fruits of Guapira opposite (Nyctaginaceae) in a Brazilian sandy plain rainforest: ant effects on seeds and seedlings. Oecologia, 139, 376–382.Google Scholar

Pizo, M. A. and Oliveira, P. S. (2000). The use of fruits and seeds by ants in the Atlantic forest of southeast Brazil. Biotropica, 32, 851–861.Google Scholar

Ponce-Reyes, R., Nicholson, E., Baxter, P.W.J., Fuller, R.A. and Possingham, H. (2013). Extinction risk in cloud forest fragments under climate change and habitat loss. Diversity and Distributions, 19, 518–529.Google Scholar

Ribeiro, E. M. S., Arroyo-Rodríguez, V., Santos, B. A., Tabarelli, M. and Leal, I. R. (2015). Chronic anthropogenic disturbance drives the biological impoverishment of the Brazilian Caatinga vegetation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52, 611–620.Google Scholar

Ribeiro, E. M. S., Arroyo-Rodríguez, V., Santos, B. A., Tabarelli, M. & Leal, I. R. (2016). Phylogenetic impoverishment of plant communities following chronic human disturbances in the Brazilian Caatinga. Ecology, 97, 1583–1592.Google Scholar

Ribeiro-Neto, J. D., Arnan, X., Tabarelli, M. and Leal, I. R. (2016). Chronic anthropogenic disturbance causes homogenization of plant and ant communities in the Brazilian Caatinga. Biodiversity and Conservation, 25, 943–956.Google Scholar

Sampaio, E. V. S. B. (1995). Overview of the Brazilian Caatinga. In Seasonal dry tropical forests, eds. Bullock, S. H., Mooney, H. A. and Medina, E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 35–63.Google Scholar

Schär, C., Vidale, P. L., Lüthi, D., Frei, C., Häberli, C., Liniger, M. A. and Appenzeller, C. (2004). The role of increasing temperature variability in European summer heatwaves. Nature, 427, 332–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schulz, K., Voigt, K., Beusch, C., Almeida-Cortez, J. S., Kowarik, I., Walz, A. and Cierjacks, A. (2016). Grazing deteriorates the soil carbon stocks of Caatinga forest ecosystems in Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management, 367, 62–70.Google Scholar

Singh, S. P. (1998). Chronic disturbance, a principal cause of environmental degradation in developing countries. Environmental Conservation, 25, 1–2.Google Scholar

Smith, B. H., Forman, P. D. and Boyd, A. E. (1989). Spatial patterns of seed dispersal and predation of 2 myrmecochorous forest herbs. Ecology, 70, 1649–1656.Google Scholar

Stuble, K. L., Patterson, C. M., Rodriguez-Cabal, M. A., Ribbons, R. R., Dunn, R. R. and Sanders, N. J. (2014). Ant-mediated seed dispersal in a warmed world. Peer J., 2, e286.Google Scholar

Sunderland, T., Apgaua, D., Baldauf, C. et al. (2015). Global dry forests: a prologue. International Forestry Review, 17, 1–9.Google Scholar

Tabarelli, M., Vicente, A. and Barbosa, D. C. A. (2003) Variation of seed dispersal spectrum of woody plants across a rainfall gradient in northeastern Brazil. Journal of Arid Environments, 53, 197–210.Google Scholar

Travis, J. M. J. (2003). Climate change and habitat destruction: a deadly anthropogenic cocktail. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 270, 467–473.Google Scholar

van der Pijl, L. (1982). Principles of dispersal in higher plants. Berlin: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Roosmalen, M. G. M. (1985). Fruits of the Guianan flora. Utrecht: Institute of Systematic Botany.Google Scholar

WarrenII, R. J., Bahn, V. and Bradford, M. A. (2011). Temperature cues phenological synchrony in ant-mediated seed dispersal. Global Change Biology, 17, 2444–2454.Google Scholar

Westoby, M., French, K., Hugdes, L., Rice, B. and Rodgerson, L. (1991). Why do more plant species use ants for dispersal on infertile compared with fertile soils? Australian Journal of Ecology, 16, 445–455.Google Scholar

Almeida, F. S, Mayhé-Nunes, A. J. & Queiroz, J. M. (2013). The importance of Poneromorph ants for seed dispersal in altered environments. Sociobiology, 60, 229–35.Google Scholar

Beattie, A. J. (1985). The Evolutionary Ecology of Ant-Plant Mutualisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bieber, A. G. D., Silva, P. S. D., Sendoya, S. F. & Oliveira, P. S. (2014). Assessing the impact of deforestation of the Atlantic rainforest on ant-fruit interactions: a field experiment using synthetic fruits. PLoS ONE, 9, e90369.Google Scholar

Böhning-Gaese, K., Gaese, B. H. & Rabemanantsoa, S. B. (1999). Importance of primary and secondary seed dispersal in the Malagasy tree Commiphora guillaumini. Ecology, 80, 821–32.Google Scholar

Bolton, B. (2003). Synopsis and classification of Formicidae. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute, 71, 1–370.Google Scholar

Bottcher, C. & Oliveira, P.S. (2014). Consumption of lipid-rich seed arils improves larval development in a Neotropical primarily carnivorous ant, Odontomachus chelifer (Ponerinae). Journal of Tropical Ecology, 30, 621–4.Google Scholar

Brandão, C. R. F., Silva, R. R. & Feitosa, R. M. (2011). Cerrado ground-dwelling ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) as indicators of edge effects. Zoologia (Curitiba), 28, 379–87.Google Scholar

Byrne, M. M. & Levey, D. J. (1993). Removal of seeds from frugivore defecations by ants in a Costa Rican rain forest. Vegetatio, 107/108, 363–74.Google Scholar

Camargo, P. H. S. A., Martins, M. M., Feitosa, R. M. & Christianini, A. V. (2016). Bird and ant synergy increases the seed dispersal effectiveness of an ornithochoric shrub. Oecologia, 181, 507–18.Google Scholar

Christianini, A. V., Mayhé-Nunes, A. J. & Oliveira, P. S. (2007). The role of ants in the removal of non-myrmecochorous diaspores and seed germination in a Neotropical savanna. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 23, 343–51.Google Scholar

Christianini, A. V., Mayhé-Nunes, A. J. (2012). Exploitation of fallen diaspores by ants: are there ant-plant partner choices? Biotropica, 44, 360–7.Google Scholar

Christianini, A. V. & Oliveira, P. S. (2009). The relevance of ants as seed rescuers of a primarily bird-dispersed tree in the Neotropical cerrado savanna. Oecologia, 160, 735–45.Google Scholar

Christianini, A. V. (2010). Birds and ants provide complementary seed dispersal in a Neotropical savanna. Journal of Ecology, 98, 573–82.Google Scholar

Christianini, A. V. (2013). Edge effects decrease ant-derived benefits to seedlings in a Neotropical savanna. Arthropod-Plant Interactions, 7, 191–9.Google Scholar

Christianini, A. V., Oliveira, P. S, Bruna, E. M. & Vasconcelos, H. L. (2014). Fauna in decline: Meek shall inherit. Science, 345, 1129.Google Scholar

Corrêa, M. M., Silva, P. S. D., Wirth, R., Tabarelli, M. & Leal, I. R. (2010). How leaf-cutting ants impact forests: drastic nest effects on light environment and plant assemblages. Oecologia, 162, 103–15.Google Scholar

Dalling, J. W. & Wirth, R. (1998). Dispersal of Miconia argentea seeds by the leaf-cutting ant Atta colombica. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 14, 705–10.Google Scholar

Dausmann, K. H., Glos, J., Linsenmair, K. E. & Ganzhorn, J. U. (2008). Improved recruitment of a lemur-dispersed tree in Malagasy dry forests after the demise of vertebrates in forest fragments. Oecologia, 157, 307–16.Google Scholar

Davidson, D. W. & Epstein, W. W. (1989). Epiphytic associations with ants. In Lüttge, U., ed., Vascular plants as epiphytes. Berlin: Springer, pp. 200–33.Google Scholar

Dias, B. F. S. (1992). Alternativas de Desenvolvimento dos Cerrados: Manejo e Conservação dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis. Brasília: Funatura.Google Scholar

Dirzo, R., Young, H. S., Galetti, et al. (2014). Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science, 345, 401–6.Google Scholar

Eisenlohr, P. V. & Oliveira-Filho, A. T. (2015). Revisiting patterns of tree species composition and their driving forces in the Atlantic forests of Southeastern Brazil. Biotropica, 47, 689–701.Google Scholar

El Bizri, H. R., Morcatty, T. Q., Lima, J. J. S. & Valsecchi, J. (2015). The thrill of the chase: uncovering illegal sport hunting in Brazil through YouTube™ posts. Ecology and Society, 20, 30.Google Scholar

Endo, W., Peres, C. A., Salas, , et al. (2010). Game vertebrate densities in hunted and nonhunted forest sites in Manu National Park, Peru. Biotropica, 42, 251–61.Google Scholar

Estes, J. A., Terborgh, J., Brashares, J. S., et al. (2011). Trophic downgrading on planet Earth. Science, 333, 301–6.Google Scholar

Farji-Brener, A. G. & Ghermandi, L. (2004). Seedling recruitment in a semi-arid Patagonian steppe: facilitative effects of refuse dumps of leaf-cutting ants. Journal of Vegetation Science, 15, 823–30.Google Scholar

Ferreira, A. V., Bruna, E. M. & Vasconcelos, H. L. (2011). Seed predators limit plant recruitment in Neotropical savannas. Oikos, 120, 1013–22.Google Scholar

Fleming, T. H., Breitwisch, R. & Whitesides, G. H. (1987). Patterns of tropical vertebrate frugivore diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 18, 91–109.Google Scholar

Fourcassié, V. & Oliveira, P. S. (2002). Foraging ecology of the giant Amazonian ant Dinoponera gigantea (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Ponerinae): activity schedule, diet, and spatial foraging patterns. Journal of Natural History, 36, 2211–27.Google Scholar

Galetti, M., Guevara, R., Côrtes, M. C., et al. (2013). Functional extinction of birds drives rapid evolutionary changes in seed size. Science, 340, 1086–90.Google Scholar

Galetti, M., Laps, R. & Pizo, M. A. (2000). Frugivory by toucans (Ramphastidae) at two altitudes in the Atlantic forest of Brazil. Biotropica, 32, 842–50.Google Scholar

Galetti, M., Pizo, M. A. & Morellato, L. P. C. (2011). Diversity of functional traits of fleshy fruits in a species-rich Atlantic rain forest. Biota Neotropica, 11, 181–93.Google Scholar

Gallegos, S.C., Hensen, I. & Schleuning, M. (2014). Secondary dispersal by ants promotes forest regeneration after deforestation. Journal of Ecology, 102, 659–66.Google Scholar

Gottsberger, G. & Silberbauer-Gottsberger, I. (1983). Dispersal and distribution in the cerrado vegetation of Brazil. Sonderbänd des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Hamburg, 7, 315–52.Google Scholar

Guimarães, P. R., & Cogni, R. (2002). Seed cleaning of Cupania vernalis (Sapindaceae) by ants: edge effect in a highland forest in south-east Brazil. Journal of Tropical Ecology 18, 303–7.Google Scholar

Henao-Gallego, N., Escobar-Ramírez, S., Calle, Z., Montoya-Lerma, J. & Armbrecht, I. (2012). An artificial aril designed to induce seed hauling by ants for ecological rehabilitation purposes. Restoration Ecology, 20, 555–60.Google Scholar

Horvitz, C. C. (1981). Analysis of how ant behaviors affect germination in a tropical myrmecochore Calathea-Microcephala (P and E) Koernicke (Marantaceae) – microsite selection and aril removal by Neotropical ants, Odontomachus, Pachycondyla, and Solenopsis (Formicidae). Oecologia, 51, 47–52.Google Scholar

Horvitz, C. C. & Beattie, A. J. (1980). Ant dispersal of Calathea (Marantaceae) seeds by carnivorous ponerines (Formicidae) in a tropical rain forest. American Journal of Botany, 67, 321–6.Google Scholar

Horvitz, C. C. & Le Corff, J. (1993). Spatial scale and dispersion pattern of ant- and bird-dispersed herbs in two tropical lowland rain forests. Vegetatio, 107, 351–62.Google Scholar

Howe, H. F. & Smallwood, J. (1982). Ecology of seed dispersal. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 13, 201–28.Google Scholar

Hughes, L. & Westoby, M. (1992). Effect of diaspore characteristics on removal of seeds adapted for dispersal by ants. Ecology, 73, 1300–12.Google Scholar

Hughes, L., Westoby, M. & Jurado, E. (1994). Convergence of elaiosomes and insect prey: evidence from ant foraging behaviour and fatty acid composition. Functional Ecology, 8, 358–65.Google Scholar

Janzen, D. H. (1970). Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests. American Naturalist, 104, 501–29.Google Scholar

Janzen, D. H. (1977). Promising directions of study in tropical animal-plant interactions. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 64, 706–36.Google Scholar

Jordano, P. (2000). Fruits and frugivory. In Fenner, M., ed., Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities. Wallingford: CAB International, pp. 125–65.Google Scholar

Kaspari, M. (1993). Removal of seeds from Neotropical frugivore droppings: ant responses to seed number. Oecologia, 95, 81–8.Google Scholar

Klink, C. A. & Machado, R. B. (2005). Conservation of the Brazilian Cerrado. Conservation Biology, 19, 707–13.Google Scholar

Laman, T. G. (1996). Ficus seed shadows in a Bornean rain forest. Oecologia, 107, 347–55.Google Scholar

Laurance, W. F., Camargo, J. L. C., Luizão, R. C. C. et al. (2010). The fate of Amazonian forest fragments: a 32-year investigation. Biological Conservation, 144, 56–67.Google Scholar

Laurance, W. F., Lovejoy, T. E., Vasconcelos, H. L. et al. (2002). Ecosystem decay of Amazonian forest fragments: a 22-year investigation. Conservation Biology, 16, 605–18.Google Scholar

Leal, I. R., Filgueiras, B. K. C., Gomes, J. P., Iannuzzi, L. & Andersen, A. N. (2012). Effects of habitat fragmentation on ant richness and functional composition in Brazilian Atlantic forest. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21, 1687–701.Google Scholar

Leal, I. R. & Oliveira, P. S. (1998). Interactions between fungus-growing ants (Attini), fruits and seeds in cerrado vegetation in Southeast Brazil. Biotropica, 30, 170–8.Google Scholar

Leal, I. R., Wirth, R. & Tabarelli, M. (2007). Seed dispersal by ants in the semi-arid Caatinga of north-east Brazil. Annals of Botany, 99, 885–94.Google Scholar

Levey, D. J. & Byrne, M. M. (1993). Complex ant–plant interactions: rain forest ants as secondary dispersers and post-dispersal seed predators. Ecology, 74, 1802–12.Google Scholar

Levey, D. J., Moermond, T. C. & Denslow, J. S. (1994). Frugivory: An overview. In McDade, L. A., Bawa, K. S., Hespenheide, H. A. & Hartshorn, G. S., eds., La Selva: Ecology and Natural History of a Neotropical Rain Forest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 282–94.Google Scholar

Lima, M. H. C., Oliveira, E. G. & Silveira, F. A. O. (2013). Interactions between ants and non-myrmecochorous fruits in Miconia (Melastomataceae) in a Neotropical savanna. Biotropica, 45, 217–23.Google Scholar

Longino, J. T, Coddington, J. & Colwell, R. K. (2002). The ant fauna of a tropical rain forest: estimating species richness three different ways. Ecology, 83, 689–702.Google Scholar

McConkey, K.R., Prasad, S., Corlett, R.T. et al. (2012). Seed dispersal in changing landscapes. Biological Conservation, 146, 1–13.Google Scholar

Mendonça, A. H., Russo, C., Melo, A. C. G. & Durigan, G. (2015). Edge effects in savanna fragments: a case study in the cerrado. Plant Ecology & Diversity, 8, 493–503.Google Scholar

Meyer, S. T., Leal, I. R., Tabarelli, M. & Wirth, R. (2011). Ecosystem engineering by leaf-cutting ants: nests of Atta cephalotes drastically alter forest structure and microclimate. Ecological Entomology, 36, 14–24.Google Scholar

Mokany, K., Prasad, S. & Westcott, D. A. (2015). Impacts of climate change and management responses in tropical forests depend on complex frugivore-mediated seed dispersal. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 24, 685–94.Google Scholar

Morellato, L. P. C. (1992). Nutrient cycling in two south-east Brazilian forests. I Litterfall and litter standing crop. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 8, 205–15.Google Scholar

Morellato, L. P. C., Alberton, B., Alvarado, S. T. et al. (2016). Linking plant phenology to conservation biology. Biological Conservation, 195, 60–72.Google Scholar

Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B. & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403, 853–8.Google Scholar

Oliveira, P. S., Galetti, M., Pedroni, F. & Morellato, L. P. C. (1995). Seed cleaning by Mycocepurus goeldii ants (Attini) facilitates germination in Hymenaea courbaril (Caesalpiniaceae). Biotropica, 27, 518–22.Google Scholar

Oliveira, P. S. & Marquis, R. J. (eds.) (2002). The Cerrados of Brazil: Ecology and Natural History of a Neotropical Savanna. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Oliveira-Filho, A. T. & Ratter, J. A. (2002). Vegetation physiognomies and woody flora of the Cerrado biome. In Oliveira, P. S. & Marquis, R. J., eds., The Cerrados of Brazil: Ecology and Natural History of a Neotropical Savanna. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 91–120.Google Scholar

Passos, L. & Oliveira, P. S. (2002). Ants affect the distribution and performance of Clusia criuva seedlings, a primarily bird-dispersed rainforest tree. Journal of Ecology, 90, 517–28.Google Scholar

Passos, L. (2003). Interactions between ants, fruits and seeds in a restinga forest in south-eastern Brazil. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 19, 261–70.Google Scholar

Passos, L. (2004). Interaction between ants and fruits of Guapira opposita (Nyctaginaceae) in a Brazilian sandy plain rainforest: ant effects on seeds and seedlings. Oecologia, 139, 376–82.Google Scholar

Pinto, N. & Keitt, T. H. (2008). Scale-dependent responses to forest cover displayed by frugivore bats. Oikos, 117, 1725–31.Google Scholar

Pizo, M. A. (1997). Seed dispersal and predation in two populations of Cabralea canjerana (Meliaceae) in the Atlantic forest of southeastern Brazil. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 13, 559–78.Google Scholar

Pizo, M. A. (2008). The use of seeds by a twig-dwelling ant on the floor of a tropical rain forest. Biotropica, 40, 119–21.Google Scholar

Pizo, M. A. & Oliveira, P. S. (1998). Interaction between ants and seeds of a nonmyrmecochorous Neotropical tree, Cabralea canjerana (Meliaceae), in the Atlantic forest of southeast Brazil. American Journal of Botany, 85, 669–74.Google Scholar

Pizo, M. A. & Oliveira, P. S. (1999). Removal of seeds from vertebrate faeces by ants: effects of seed species and deposition site. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 77, 1595–1602.Google Scholar

Pizo, M. A. & Oliveira, P. S. (2000). The use of fruits and seeds by ants in the Atlantic forest of southeast Brazil. Biotropica, 32, 851–61.Google Scholar

Pizo, M. A. & Oliveira, P. S. (2001). Size and lipid content of nonmyrmecochorous diaspores: effects on the interaction with litter-foraging ants in the Atlantic rain forest of Brazil. Plant Ecology, 157, 37–52.Google Scholar

Pizo, M. A., Passos, L. & Oliveira, P. S. (2005). Ants as seed dispersers of fleshy diaspores in Brazilian Atlantic forests. In Forget, P.-M., Lambert, J. E., Hulme, P. E. and Vander Wall, S. B., eds., Seed Fate: Predation and Secondary Dispersal. Wallingford: CABI Publishing, pp. 315–29.Google Scholar

Redford, K. H. (1992). The empty forest. BioScience, 42, 412–22.Google Scholar

Ribeiro, M. C., Metzger, J. P., Martensen, A. C., Ponzoni, F. J. & Hirota, M. M. (2009). The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: how much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biological Conservation, 142, 1141–53.Google Scholar

Rico-Gray, V. & Oliveira, P. S. (2007). The Ecology and Evolution of Ant-Plant Interactions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Roberts, J. T. & Heithaus, R. (1986). Ants rearrange the vertebrate-generated seed shadow of a Neotropical fig tree. Ecology, 67, 1046–51.Google Scholar

Santos-Heredia, C., Andresen, E. & Stevenson, P. (2011). Secondary seed dispersal by dung beetles in an Amazonian forest fragment of Colombia: influence of dung type and edge effect. Integrative Zoology, 6, 399–408.Google Scholar

Schaefer, H. M. & Ruxton, G. D. (2011). Plant-Animal Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Terborgh, J., Nuñez-Iturri, G., Pitman, N. C. A. et al. (2008). Tree recruitment in an empty forest. Ecology, 89, 1757–68.Google Scholar

Travis, J. M. J., Delgado, M., Bocedi, G. et al. (2013). Dispersal and species response to climate change. Oikos, 122, 1532–40.Google Scholar

van der Pijl, L. (1969). Principles of Seed Dispersal in Higher Plants. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Vander Wall, S. B. & Longland, W. S. (2005). Diplochory and the evolution of seed dispersal. In Forget, P.-M., Lambert, J. E., Hulme, P. E. and Vander Wall, S. B., eds., Seed Fate: Predation and Secondary Dispersal. Wallingford: CABI Publishing, pp. 297–314.Google Scholar

Vasconcelos, H. L., Pacheco, R., Silva, R. C. et al. (2009). Dynamics of the leaf-litter arthropod fauna following fire in a Neotropical woodland savanna. PLoS ONE, 4, e7762.Google Scholar

Vasconcelos, H. L., Vieira Neto, E. M. H., Mundim, F. M. R. & Bruna, E. M. (2006). Roads alter the colonization dynamics of a keystone herbivore in Neotropical savannas. Biotropica, 38, 661–5.Google Scholar

Wilson, E. O. (1987). The little things that run the world. Conservation Biology, 1, 344–6.Google Scholar

Wirth, R., Herz, H., Ryel, R., Beyschlag, W. & Hölldobler, B. (2003). Herbivory of Leaf-Cutting Ants – A Case Study on Atta Colombica in the Tropical Rainforest of Panama. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Wright, S. J. (2003). The myriad consequences of hunting for vertebrates and plants in tropical forests. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 6, 73–86.Google Scholar

Zwiener, V. P., Bihn, J. H. & Marques, M. C. M. (2012). Ant-diaspore interactions during secondary succession in the Atlantic forest of Brazil. Revista de Biologia Tropical, 60, 933–42.Google Scholar