Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:01:46.901Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Sexual segregation effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

Aldo Poiani
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Get access

Summary

In some species of animals, including birds and mammals, the sexes may segregate for part or even most of the year (Ruckstuhl & Neuhaus 2005). Although a widely accepted definition of sexual segregation remains somewhat elusive (Bowyer 2004), owing in part to the diversity of behavioural patterns and mechanisms involved in this phenomenon, its essential features could be encapsulated in the following definition: sexual segregation is a greater distancing in space or time between members of different sexes than between members of the same sex. Such spatiotemporal distancing between the sexes may occur at all possible scales (Catry et al. 2005): from the micro (few hours or few metres) to the macro (many days or kilometres), and it will encompass both social and non-social species. Moreover, this definition also allows the use of appropriate statistical tools (e.g. multidimensional scaling) in order to determine whether a population does indeed display sexual segregation at any specific spatiotemporal scale or not.

Along the time axis, we should also consider the possibility that sexual segregation may vary ontogenetically, with taxon-specific tendencies for sexual segregation to be more prevalent at some ages than at others. For instance, larger and older adult beluga whale (Delphinapterus leucas) males segregate from females in summer in the Canadian high Arctic, but younger males do not (Loseto et al. 2006). Obviously, when individuals in a population are not sexually segregated, it means that they are sexually aggregated (Bowyer 2004). Following the above definition of sexual segregation, in species such as the Douglas’s squirrel (Tamiasciurus douglasii) (Koford 1982) where members of a local population hold individual territories that are not clumped into sex-specific clusters but instead male and female territories are spatially interspersed, we cannot talk of sexual segregation. Rather, species such as T. douglasii show individual segregation irrespective of sex (i.e. they are individually segregated but sexually aggregated).

Type
Chapter
Information
Animal Homosexuality
A Biosocial Perspective
, pp. 283 - 322
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Sexual segregation effects
  • Aldo Poiani, Monash University, Victoria
  • Book: Animal Homosexuality
  • Online publication: 05 July 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762192.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Sexual segregation effects
  • Aldo Poiani, Monash University, Victoria
  • Book: Animal Homosexuality
  • Online publication: 05 July 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762192.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Sexual segregation effects
  • Aldo Poiani, Monash University, Victoria
  • Book: Animal Homosexuality
  • Online publication: 05 July 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762192.008
Available formats
×