Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T02:46:12.752Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Is the sum of the parts equal to the whole: The conflict between individuality and group membership

from Part three - Behavioral ecology and evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2010

Julia K. Parrish
Affiliation:
University of Washington
William M. Hamner
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get access

Summary

The schools swam, marshaled and patrolled. They turned as a unit and dived as a unit. In their millions they followed a pattern minute as to direction and depth and speed. There must be some fallacy in our thinking of these fish as individuals. Their functions in the school are in some as yet unknown way as controlled as though the school were one unit. We cannot conceive of this intricacy until we are able to think of the school as an animal itself, reacting with all its cells to stimuli which perhaps might not influence one fish at all. And this larger animal, the school, seems to have a nature and drive and ends of its own. It is more than and different from the sum of its units.

(Steinbeck & Ricketts 1941)

Introduction

Aggregation behavior can be found in almost every animal taxa, from the rudimentary assemblages of planktonic larvae reacting to photo- or geokineses to the highly developed social orders of terrestrial mammals. Somewhere in the middle of this cline lie the dense aggregations of birds, insects, and fish – perhaps directed by individually based attractions/repulsions to extraneous source material, as well as by the development of simple social order. Visually, these groups may appear, at least superficially, similar. They are dense, structured congregations with distinct edges, often moving as a group from place to place. It is tempting to imagine that the forces regulating the evolution and maintenance of these congregations were/are similar as well. However, practically, we know that species are subject to very different selective pressures.

Type
Chapter
Information
Animal Groups in Three Dimensions
How Species Aggregate
, pp. 165 - 173
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×