Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 2
  • Print publication year: 2015
  • Online publication date: November 2015

3 - Party Activists, Interest Groups, and Polarization in American Politics

from PART I - POLARIZATION AMONG VOTERS AND ACTIVISTS

Summary

• Parties are more than their formal structures. They cannot be understood without attention to the role of both activists and party-aligned interest groups.

• The policy preferences of activists and interest groups are both shaped by and shape the behavior of elected officials. Sometimes activists and lobbies take cues from politicians, but their actions also reinforce and contribute to polarization in important ways.

• The polarization of Democrats and Republicans reflects the incorporation of new groups in party coalitions since the 1970s.

Polarization is visible in many aspects of American politics, from Congress to the courts to state legislatures and even the electorate. The common thread linking all of these settings is political parties. Polarization is a party story. Yet understanding American parties is a challenging endeavor. Parties, unlike the branches of government or even the electorate, are not well-bounded entities. Individuals and groups with no formal role or place on the organization chart play important roles in parties.

In this chapter, I argue that activists and interest groups are key elements of political parties. Activists and party-aligned interest groups work within parties to advance their policy goals via candidate selection and lobbying elected officials. Unlike the formal party structure and some elements closely linked to it, activists and interest groups are a force for polarization. I review delegate and donor surveys as well as trends in interest group campaign contributions revealing evidence of polarization among activists and lobbies. Elected officials’ relationships with party activists and interest groups are not one-sided. Even more than highly informed voters, activists take cues from politicians, and interest group leaders are subject to pressure from elected officials. Still, evidence suggests that activists and party-linked interest groups promote polarization.

AMERICAN POLITICAL PARTIES: REVIVED AND POLARIZED

American political parties, once seen to be in terminal decline, have been reinvigorated in recent decades. In the same period that polarization emerged, party organizations have grown far better funded and staffed (Herrnson 2013). Mann and Corrado (2014) find that in the 1976 campaign, the Democratic National Committee (DNC), Democratic Senate Campaign Committee (DSCC), and Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) raised $52.8 million, $4.1 million, and $3.8 million, respectively (all sums are in 2012 dollars). By 2012, the DNC, DSCC, and DCCC raised $290.4 million, $145.9 million, and $183.8 million in 2012 dollars, respectively.

Abramowitz, Alan I. 2010. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization and American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Adams, Greg D. 1997. “Abortion: Evidence of an Issue Evolution.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (3): 718–737.
Aldrich, John H. 2011. Why Parties? A Second Look. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Snyder, James M. Jr., and Stewart, Charles III. 2001. “Candidate Positioning in U.S. House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (1): 136–159.
Bawn, Kathleen, Cohen, Martin, Karol, David, Masket, Seth, Noel, Hans and Zaller, John. 2012. ”A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands and Nominations in American Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 10 (3): 571–597.
Bernstein, Jonathan, and Dominguez, Casey B.K.. 2003. “Candidates and Candidacies in the Expanded Party.” PS: Political Science and Politics 36 (2): 165–169.
Bishin, Benjamin G. 2009. Tyranny of the Minority: The Subconstituency Theory of Representation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Boatright, Robert. 2013. Getting Primaried. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Bonica, Adam 2011, “Small Donors and Polarization.” Boston Review, July 22.
Broockman, David, and Skovron, Chris. 2014. “What Politicians Believe about Their Constituents: Asymmetric Misperceptions and Prospects for Constituency Control.” Unpublished MS, University of California, Berkeley.
Brown, Clifford W., Hedges, Roman and Powell, Lynda W.. 1980. “Belief Structure in a Political Elite: Contributions to the 1972 Presidential Candidates.” Polity 13 (1): 134–146.
Carmines, Edward G., and Woods, James. 2002. “The Role of Party Activists in the Abortion Issue.” Political Behavior 24 (4): 361–377.
Carmines, Edward G., and Stimson, James. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Clark, Peter B., and Wilson, James Q.. 1961. “Incentive Systems: A Theory of Organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly 6 (2): 129–166.
Cohen, Martin. 2005. “Moral Victories: Cultural Conservatism and the Creation of a New Republican Congressional Majority.” Ph.D. diss., University of California, Los Angeles.
Cohen, Marty, Karol, David, Noel, Hans, and Zaller, John. 2008a. “The Invisible Primary in Presidential Nominations, 1980–2004.” In Mayer, William G., ed., The Making of the Presidential Candidates 2008. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Cohen, Marty, Karol, David, Noel, Hans, and Zaller, John. 2008b. The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations before and after Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dark, Taylor E. 2001. The Unions and the Democrats: An Enduring Alliance. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Dominguez, Casey B.K. 2011. “Does the Party Matter? Endorsements in Congressional Primaries.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (3): 534–544.
Enos, Ryan, and Hersh, Eitan. Forthcoming. “Party Activists as Campaign Advertisers: The Ground Campaign as a Principal-Agent Problem.” American Political Science Review.
Fenno, Richard F. Jr. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown.
Ferrell, Robert H. 1994. Choosing Truman: The Democratic Convention of 1944. Columbia : University of Missouri Press.
Fiorina, Morris P., with Abrams, Samuel J.. 2009. Disconnect: The Breakdown of Representation in American Politics. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Fox, Richard, and Lawless, Jennifer. 2010. “If Only They'd Ask: Gender, Recruitment and Political Ambition.” Journal of Politics 72 (2): 310–326.
Francia, Peter L., Green, John C., Herrnson, Paul S., Powell, Lynda W., and Wilcox, Clyde. 2005. “Limousine Liberals and Corporate Conservatives: The Financial Constituencies of the Democratic and Republican Parties.” Social Science Quarterly 86: 762–778.
Gimpel, James G., Lee, Frances E., and Parrott, Michael. 2014. “Business Interests and the Party Coalitions: Industry Sector Contributions to U.S. Congressional Candidates.” American Politics Research 42: 1034–1076.
Gottschalk, Marie. 2000. The Shadow Welfare State: Labor, Business and the Politics of Health Care in the U.S. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Hacker, Jacob S., and Pierson, Paul. 2005. Off-Center: The Republican Revolution and the Erosion of American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Herrnson, Paul S. 2013. “National Parties in the 21st Century.” In Brewer, Mark D. and Maisel, L. Sandy, eds., The Parties Respond: Changes in American Parties and Campaigns. th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 131–160.
Herrnson, Paul S. 2009. “The Roles of Party Organizations, Party-Connected Committees, and Party Allies in Elections.” Journal of Politics 71 (4): 1207–1224.
Hinchliffe, Kelsey, and Lee, Frances. 2014. “Party Competition and Conflict in State Legislatures.” Paper Presented at the 2014 Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Political Science Association.
Hollibaugh, Gary E. Jr. Forthcoming. “The Political Determinants of Ambassadorial Appointments.” Presidential Studies Quarterly.
Jennings, M. Kent. 1992. “Ideological Thinking among Mass Publics and Political Elites.” Public Opinion Quarterly 56 (4): 419–441.
Karol, David. 2014a. “Parties and Leadership in American Politics.” Paper prepared for Conference on “Leadership in American Politics.” Miller Center, University of Virginia. Charlottesville, Virginia, June 2–3, 2014.
Karol, David. 2014b. “Parties Revised and Revived: Democrats and Republicans in the Age of Reagan, 1980–2000.” In Hershey, Marjorie, ed., CQ Guide to U.S. Political Parties. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Karol, David. 2009. Party Position Change in American Politics: Coalition Management. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kolodny, Robin. 2000. “Electoral Partnerships: Political Consultants and Political Parties.” In Thurber, James A. and Nelson, Candace J., eds., Campaign Warriors: Political Consultants in Elections. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Kull, Steven, and Destler, I.M.. 1999. Misreading the Public: The Myth of a New Isolationism. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
La Raja, Raymond J., and Wiltse, David L.. 2012. “Don't Blame Donors for Ideological Polarization of Political Parties.” American Politics Research 40 (30): 501–530.
Layman, Geoffrey C., Carsey, Thomas M., Green, John C., Herrera, Richard, and Cooperman, Rosalyn. 2010. “Activists and Conflict Extension in American Politics.” American Political Science Review 104 (2): 324–346.
Layman, Geoffrey C., Carsey, Thomas M., and Horowitz, Juliana Menasce. 2006. “Party Polarization in American Politics: Characteristics, Causes, and Consequences.” Annual Review of Political Science 9: 83–110.
Lee, Frances E. 2013. “An Irresponsible Two-Party System? Problems of Governance in a Time of Uncertain Majorities.” Paper prepared for presentation at the Oxford Conference on Governing in Polarized Politics, Oxford University, April 17, 2013.
Mann, Thomas E., and Corrado, Anthony. 2014. “Party Polarization and Campaign Finance.” Report of the Center for Effective Public Management. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution.
Martin, Cathie Jo. 1995. “Stuck in Neutral: Big Business and the Politics of National Health Reform.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 20 (2): 431–436.
Mayhew, David. R. 1986. Placing Parties in American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 2007. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McClosky, Herbert, Hoffman, Paul, and O'Hara, Rosemary, 1960.“Issue Conflict and Consensus among Party Leaders and Followers.” American Political Science Review 54: 406–472.
Miler, Kristina C. 2010. Constituency Representation in Congress: The View from the Hill. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Miller, Warren, and Stokes, Donald E.. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” The American Political Science Review 57 (1): 45–56.
Polsby, Nelson W. 1983 Consequences of Party Reform. New York: Oxford University Press.
Saunders, K.L., and Abramowitz, A.I.. 2004. Ideological Realignment and Active Partisans in the American Electorate. American Politics Research 32: 285–309.
Schlesinger, Joseph. 1984. “On the Theory of Party Organization.” Journal of Politics 46 (2): 369–400.
Schwartz, Mildred. 1990. The Party Network: The Robust Organization of Illinois Republicans. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Shaiko, Ronald G. 1998. “Reverse Lobbying: Interest Group Mobilization from the White House and the Hill.” In Cigler, Allan J. and Loomis, Burdett A., eds., Interest Group Politics, edition. Washington DC: CQ Press, 259–267.
Shipan, Charles R., and Lowry, William R.. 2001. “Environmental Policy and Party Divergence in Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (2): 245–263.
Sinclair, Barbara. 2006. Party Wars: Polarization and the Politics of National Policy Making. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Skinner, Richard. 2007. More than Money: Interest Group Action in Congressional Elections. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Wand, Jonathan. 2007. “The Allocation of Campaign Contributions by Interest Groups and the Rise of Elite Polarization.” Unpublished MS, Stanford University.
Weir, Margaret. 1995. “Institutional and Political Obstacles to Reform.” Health Affairs 14 (1): 102–104.
Weiss, Nancy. 1983. Farewell to the Party of Lincoln: Black Politics in the Age of FDR. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wolbrecht, Christina. 2002. “Explaining Women's Rights Realignment: Convention Delegates, 1972–1992.” Political Behavior 24: 237–282.