Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 6
  • Print publication year: 2015
  • Online publication date: November 2015

1 - The New American Electorate: Partisan, Sorted, and Polarized

from PART I - POLARIZATION AMONG VOTERS AND ACTIVISTS

Summary

• The United States has entered a new era of electoral competition in the twenty-first century.

• The key features of the new era of electoral competition are a closely divided electorate at the national level, one-party domination of most states and congressional districts, and a high degree of consistency in the outcomes of elections over time and across different types of elections.

• These features of electoral competition reflect the growing strength of partisanship within the American electorate – party loyalty and straight-ticket voting have reached record levels in recent years.

• The partisan behavior of the electorate is based on a growing divergence between the Democratic and Republican electoral coalitions along racial, cultural, and ideological lines.

In the first two decades of the twenty-first century, the United States has entered a new era of electoral competition. This new era of competition has three main characteristics that distinguish it from the patterns of electoral competition that were evident for half a century following the end of World War II. First, there is a close balance of support for the two major political parties at the national level, which has resulted in intense competition for control of Congress and the White House. Second, despite the close balance of support between the parties at the national level, there is widespread one-party dominance at the state and local levels. Third, there is a high degree of consistency in the outcomes of elections over time and across different types of elections. These three characteristics are closely related. All of them reflect the central underlying reality of American electoral politics in the current era: an electorate that is strongly partisan and deeply divided along racial, ideological, and cultural lines (White 2003; Hood, Kidd, and Morris 2004; Abramowitz and Saunders 2006; Brewer and Stonecash 2007; Jacobson 2007; Hillygus and Shields 2008, ch. 5; Abramowitz 2013; Jacobson 2013).

COMPETITIVE ELECTIONS

Recent national elections in the United States have been highly competitive. Shifts in party control of both chambers of Congress and the White House have been fairly regular, and popular vote margins in presidential elections have been relatively close. Between 1948 and 1992, shifts in party control of the White House occurred quite regularly, with party control changing in 1952, 1960, 1968, 1976, 1980, and 1992.

Abramowitz, Alan I. 2013. The Polarized Public: Why Our Government Is So Dysfunctional. New York: Pearson Longman.
Abramowitz, Alan I. 2010. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Abramowitz, Alan I., Alexander, Brad, and Gunning, Matthew. 2006. “Incumbency, Redistricting, and the Decline of Competition in U.S. House Elections.” The Journal of Politics 68 (1): 75–88.
Abramowitz, Alan I., and Saunders, Kyle L.. 2006. “Exploring the Bases of Partisanship in the American Electorate: Social Identity vs. Ideology.” Political Research Quarterly 59 (2): 175–187.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Rodden, Jonathan, and Snyder, James M.. 2006. “Purple America.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (2): 97–118.
Bafumi, Joseph, and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 2009. “A New Partisan Voter.” Journal of Politics 71 (1): 1–24.
Black, Earl, and Black, Merle. 1987. Politics and Society in the South. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brewer, Mark D., and Stonecash, Jeffrey M.. 2007. Split: Class and Cultural Divides in American Politics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Conover, Pamela J., and Feldman, Stanley. 1981. “The Origins and Meaning of Liberal/Conservative Self-Identifications.” American Journal of Political Science 25 (4): 617–645.
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Apter, David E., ed., Ideology and Discontent. New York: The Free Press, 206–261.
Fiorina, Morris P., Abrams, Samuel J., and Pope, Jeremy C.. 2011. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. ed. New York: Pearson Longman.
Fiorina, Morris P., Abrams, Samuel J., and Pope, Jeremy C.. 2008. “Polarization in the American Public: Misconceptions and Misreadings.” The Journal of Politics 70 (2): 556–560.
Fiorina, Morris P., and Abrams, Samuel J.. 2012. Disconnect: The Breakdown of Representation in American Politics. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Frey, William H. 2008. “Race, Immigration, and America's Changing Electorate.” In Teixeira, Ruy, ed., Red, Blue, and Purple America: The Future of Election Demographics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 79–108.
Hillygus, D. Sunshine, and Shields, Todd G.. 2008. The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hood, M.V. III, Kidd, Quentin, and Morris, Irwin L.. 2004. “The Reintroduction of the Elephas Maximus to the Southern United States: The Rise of Republican State Parties, 1960 to 2000.” American Politics Research 32 (1): 68–101.
Iyengar, Shanto, Sood, Gaurov, and Lelkes, Yphtach. 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76 (3): 405–431.
Jacobson, Gary C. 2013. “How the Economy and Partisanship Shaped the 2012 Presidential and Congressional Elections.” Political Science Quarterly, 128 (1): 1–38.
Jacobson, Gary C. 2007. A Divider, Not a Uniter: George W. Bush and the American People. New York: Pearson Longman.
Jaffe, Greg. 2012. “GOP's Akin, Mourdock Lose Senate Elections,” Washington Post, November 7. Retrieved from http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2012-11-07/politics/35504534_1_republican-richard-mourdock-senate-seat-akin
Keith, Bruce E., Magleby, David B., Nelson, Candace J., Orr, Elizabeth A., and Westlye, Mark C.. 1992. The Myth of the Independent Voter. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kinder, Donald R., and Kam, Cindy D.. 2009. Us against Them: Ethnocentric Foundations of American Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kinder, Donald R., and Dale-Riddle, Allison. 2012. The End of Race? Obama, 2008, and Racial Politics in America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Levendusky, Matthew S. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levendusky, Matthew S., and Pope, Jeremy C.. 2011. “Red States vs. Blue States: Going beyond the Mean.” Public Opinion Quarterly 75 (2): 227–248.
Mann, Thomas E., and Ornstein, Norman J.. 2012. “Let's Just Say It: The Republicans Are the Problem.” Washington Post, April 27. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/lets-just-say-it-the-republicans-are-the-problem/2012/04/27/gIQAxCVUlT_story.html
Masket, Seth E., Winburn, Jonathan, and Wright, Gerald C.. 2012. “The Gerrymanders Are Coming! Legislative Redistricting Won't Affect Competition or Polarization Much, No Matter Who Does It.” PS: Political Science and Politics 45 (1): 39–43.
Mason, Lilliana. 2013. “The Rise of Uncivil Agreement: Issue Versus Behavioral Polarization in the American Electorate,” American Behavioral Scientist 57: 140–159.
Mayhew, David R. 1991. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking and Investigations, 1946–1990. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Prior, Markus. 2007. Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stonecash, Jeffrey M., Brewer, Mark D., and Mariani, Mack D.. 2003. Diverging Parties: Social Change, Realignment, and Party Polarization. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Tesler, Michael, and Sears, David O.. 2010. Obama's Race: The 2008 Election and the Dream of a Post-Racial America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
White, John K. 2003. The Values Divide. New York: Chatham House.