Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Print publication year: 2004
  • Online publication date: February 2010

20 - Genetically modified foods, trade, and developing countries



The current debate about the use of genetic engineering in agricultural production reveals substantial differences in perception of the risks and benefits associated with this new biotechnology. Farmers in North America and a few large developing countries such as Argentina, Mexico, and China are rapidly adopting the new genetically modified (GM) crop varieties as they become available, and citizens in these countries are generally accepting this development. Growing GM crop varieties provides farmers with a range of agronomic benefits, mainly in terms of lower input requirements and hence lower costs to consumers. However, in other parts of the world, especially Western Europe, people are concerned about the environmental impact of widespread cultivation of GM crops and the safety of foods containing genetically modified organisms (GMOs). In response to the strong consumer reaction against GM foods in Western Europe, and to a certain extent also in Japan, separate production systems for GM and non-GM crops are emerging in the maize and soybean sectors. To the extent that GM-critical consumers are willing to pay a price premium for non-GM varieties there may be a viable market for these products alongside the new GM varieties.

Developing countries – regardless of whether they are exporters or importers of agricultural crops – will be affected by changing consumer attitudes toward genetic modification in the developed world. Some developing countries are highly dependent on exporting particular primary agricultural products to GM-critical regions.

James, C., 1997. “Global Status of Transgenic Crops in 1997,” International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications Briefs, 5, International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications, Ithaca
James, C.,1998. “Global Review of Commercialized Transgenic Crops: 1998,” International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications Briefs, 8, International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications, Ithaca
James, C.,1999. “Global Status of Commercialized Transgenic Crops: 1999,” International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications Briefs, 12: Preview, International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications, Ithaca
James, C. and A. Krattiger, 1999. “The Role of the Private Sector,” Brief 4 of 10 in A 2020 Vision for Food, Agriculture and the Environment. Biotechnology for Developing/Country Agriculture: Problems and Opportunities, ed. G. J. Persley, Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute
Lewis, J. D., S. Robinson, and K. Thierfelder, 1999. “After the Negotiations: Assessing the Impact of Free Trade Agreements in Southern Africa,” TMD Discussion Paper, 46, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, September
McDougall, R. A., A. Elbehri, and T. P. Truong (eds.), 1998. “Global Trade, Assistance, and Protection: The Global Trade Analysis Project 4 Data Base,” Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University
Nelson, G. C., T. Josling, D. Bullock, L. Unnevehr, M. Rosegrant, and L. Hill, 1999, “The Economics and Politics of Genetically Modified Organisms: Implications for World Trade Organization 2000,” Bulletin 809, College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, November
Nielsen, C. P. and K. Anderson, 2000. “Genetically Modified Organisms, Trade Policy, and Welfare in Rich and Poor Countries,” paper prepared for a World Bank Workshop on Standards, Regulation and Trade, April 27, Washington, DC,
Nielsen, C. P., Robinson, S., and Thierfelder, K., 2001. “Genetic Engineering and Trade: Panacea or Dilemma for Developing Countries,” World Development, 29(8), 1307–24
Nielsen, C. P., K. Thierfelder, and S. Robinson, 2001. “Consumer Attitudes Towards Genetically Modified Foods, The Modeling of Preference Changes,” SJFI Working Paper, 1/2001, Danish Institute of Agricultural and Fisheries Economics, Copengagen
Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), 1999. “Modern Biotechnology and Agricultural Markets: A Discussion of Selected Issues and the Impact on Supply and Markets,” Directorate for Food, Agriculture and Fisheries. Committee for Agriculture, AGR/CA/APM/CFS/MD(2000)2, Paris
Pray, C. E., D. Ma, J. Huang, and F. Qiao, 2000. “Impact of Bt Cotton in China,” paper presented at a seminar at the International Food Policy Research Institute (International Food Policy Research Institute), May
US Department of Agriculture (United States Department of Agriculture), 2000a. “Biotech Corn and Soybeans: Changing Markets and the Government's Role,” 12 April,
US Department of Agriculture (United States Department of Agriculture),2000b. “Biotechnology: US Grain Handlers Look Ahead,” Agricultural Outlook, April, Economic Research Service/United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC