Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T18:44:01.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Ecologically Effective Population Sizes and Functional Extinction of Species in Ecosystems

from Part I - Food Webs: Complexity and Stability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2017

By
Bo Ebenman ,
Torbjörn Säterberg  and
Stefan Sellman
Edited by
John C. Moore ,
Peter C. de Ruiter ,
Kevin S. McCann  and
Volkmar Wolters
John C. Moore
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
Peter C. de Ruiter
Affiliation:
Wageningen Universiteit, The Netherlands
Kevin S. McCann
Affiliation:
University of Guelph, Ontario
Volkmar Wolters
Affiliation:
Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen, Germany
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Adaptive Food Webs
Stability and Transitions of Real and Model Ecosystems
 , pp. 45 - 61
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, P. (2009). When does greater mortality increase population size? The long history and diverse mechanisms underlying the hydra effect. Ecology Letters, 12, 462–474.Google Scholar
Allesina, S. and Bodini, A. (2004). Who dominates whom in the ecosystem? Energy flow bottlenecks and cascading extinctions. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 230, 351–358.Google Scholar
Allesina, S. and Tang, S. (2012). Stability criteria for complex ecosystems. Nature, 483, 205–208.Google Scholar
Anderson, S., Kelly, D., Ladley, J., Molloy, S., and Terry, J. (2011). Cascading effects of bird functional extinction reduce pollination and plant density. Science, 331, 1068–1071.Google Scholar
Barnosky, A., Matzke, N., Tomiya, S., et al. (2011). Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived? Nature, 471, 51–57.Google Scholar
Baum, J. and Worm, B. (2009). Cascading top–down effects of changing oceanic predator abundances. Journal of Animal Ecology, 78, 699–714.Google Scholar
Baum, J., Myers, R., Kehler, D., et al. (2003). Collapse and conservation of shark populations in the northwest Atlantic. Science, 299, 389–392.Google Scholar
Beisner, B., Haydon, D., and Cuddington, K. (2003). Alternative stable states in ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1, 376–382.Google Scholar
Berg, S., Christianou, M., Jonsson, T., and Ebenman, B. (2011). Using sensitivity analysis to identify keystone species in size-based food webs. Oikos, 120, 510–519.Google Scholar
Borrvall, C., Ebenman, B., and Jonsson, T. (2000). Biodiversity lessens the risk of cascading extinction in model food webs. Ecology Letters, 3, 131–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brose, U., Williams, R., and Martinez, N. (2006). Allometric scaling enhances stability in complex food webs. Ecology Letters, 9, 1228–1236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brummit, N., Bachman, S., and Moat, J. (2008). Applications of the IUCN Red List: towards a global barometer for plant diversity. Endangered Species Research, 6, 127–135.Google Scholar
Butchart, S., Walpole, M., Collen, B., et al. (2010). Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science, 328, 1164–1168.Google Scholar
Casini, M., Hjelm, J., Molinero, J., et al. (2009). Trophic cascades promote threshold-like shifts in pelagic marine ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 197–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, J., Briand, F., and Newman, C. (1990). Community Food Webs: Data and Theory. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collen, B., Loh, J., Whitmee, S., et al. (2009). Monitoring change in vertebrate abundance: the Living Planet Index. Conservation Biology, 23, 317–327.Google Scholar
Colman, N., Gordon, C., Crowther, M., and Letnic, M. (2014). Lethal control of an apex predator has unintended cascading effects on forest mammal assemblages. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281, 20133094.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colwell, R., Dunn, R., and Harris, N. (2012). Coextinction and persistence of dependent species in a changing world. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 43, 183–203.Google Scholar
Conner, R. (1988). Wildlife populations: minimally viable or ecologically functional? Wildlife Society Bulletin, 16, 80–84.Google Scholar
Curtsdotter, A., Binzer, A., Brose, U., et al. (2011). Robustness to secondary extinctions: comparing trait-based sequential deletions in static and dynamic food webs. Basic and Applied Ecology, 12, 571–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cury, P., Boyd, I., Bonhommeau, S., et al. (2011). Global seabird response to forage fish depletion: one-third for the birds. Science, 334, 1703–1706.Google Scholar
de Roos, A. and Persson, L. (2013). Population and Community Ecology of Ontogenetic Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Di Marco, M., Boitani, L., Mallon, D., et al. (2014). A retrospective evaluation of the global decline of carnivores and ungulates. Conservation Biology, DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dirzo, R., Young, H., Galetti, M., et al. (2014). Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science, 345, 401–406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunne, J., Williams, R., and Martinez, N. (2002). Network structure and biodiversity loss in food webs: robustness increases with connectance. Ecology Letters, 5, 558–567.Google Scholar
Ebenman, B. (1987). Niche differences between age classes and intraspecific competition in age-structured populations. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 124, 25–33.Google Scholar
Ebenman, B. (1992). Evolution in organisms that change their niches during the life cycle. American Naturalist, 139, 990–1021.Google Scholar
Ebenman, B. and Jonsson, T. (2005). Using community viability analysis to identify fragile systems and keystone species. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20, 568–575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ebenman, B. and Persson, L. (1988). Size-Structured Populations: Ecology and Evolution. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Ebenman, B., Law, R., and Borrvall, C. (2004). Community viability analysis: the response of ecological communities to species loss. Ecology, 85, 2591–2600.Google Scholar
Eklöf, A. and Ebenman, B. (2006). Species loss and secondary extinctions in simple and complex model communities. Journal of Animal Ecology, 75, 239–246.Google Scholar
Estes, J. A. and Palmisano, J. F. (1974) Sea otters: their role in structuring nearshore communities. Science, 185, 1058–1060.Google Scholar
Estes, J., Duggins, D., and Rathbun, G. (1989). The ecology of extinctions in kelp forest communities. Conservation Biology, 3, 252–264.Google Scholar
Estes, J., Tinker, T., and Bodkin, J. (2010). Using ecological function to develop recovery criteria for depleted species: sea otters and kelp forests in the Aleutian archipelago. Conservation Biology, 24, 852–860.Google Scholar
Estes, J. A., Terborgh, J., Brashares, J. S., et al. (2011). Trophic downgrading of planet Earth. Science, 333, 301–306.Google Scholar
Fowler, M. (2010). Extinction cascades and the distribution of species interactions. Oikos, 119, 864–873.Google Scholar
Frank, K., Petrie, B., Choi, J., and Leggett, W. (2005). Trophic cascades in a formerly cod-dominated ecosystem. Science, 308, 1621–1623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froyd, C., Coffey, E., van der Knapp, W., et al. (2014). The ecological consequences of megafaunal loss: giant tortoises and wetland biodiversity. Ecology Letters, 17, 144–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galetti, M., Guevara, R., Côrtes, M., et al. (2013). Functional extinction of birds drives rapid evolutionary changes in seed size. Science, 340, 1086–1090.Google Scholar
Gaston, K., Blackburn, T., and Goldewijk, K. (2003). Habitat conversion and global avian biodiversity loss. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 270, 1293–1300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, B., Tunney, T., McCann, K., et al. (2014). A bioenergetics framework for the temperature dependence of trophic interactions. Ecology Letters, 17, 902–914.Google Scholar
Gross, T., Rudolf, L., Levin, S., and Dieckmann, U. (2009). Generalized models reveal stabilizing factors in food webs. Science, 325, 747–750.Google Scholar
IUCN (2014). IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.1.Google Scholar
Ives, A., Dennis, B., Cottingham, K., and Carpenter, S. (2003). Estimating community stability and ecological interactions from time-series data. Ecological Monographs, 73, 301–330.Google Scholar
Jackson, J., Kirby, M., Berger, H., et al. (2001). Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science, 293, 629–638.Google Scholar
Joppa, L., Roberts, D., and Pimm, S. (2011). How many species of flowering plants are there? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 554–559.Google Scholar
Kaneryd, L., Borrvall, C., Berg, S., et al. (2012). Species-rich ecosystems are vulnerable to cascading extinctions in an increasingly variable world. Ecology and Evolution, 2, 858–874.Google Scholar
Lande, R. (1993). Risk of population extinction from demographic and environmental stochasticity and random catastrophes. American Naturalist, 142, 911–927.Google Scholar
Lewis, H. and Law, R. (2007). Effects of dynamics on ecological networks. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 247, 64–76.Google Scholar
Loh, J., Green, R., Rickets, T., et al. (2005). The Living Planet Index: using species population time series to track trends in biodiversity. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 360, 289–295.Google Scholar
Lundberg, P., Ranta, E., and Kaitala, V. (2000). Species loss leads to community closure. Ecology Letters, 3, 465–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, R. (1972). Will a large complex system be stable? Nature, 238, 413–414.Google Scholar
May, R. (1977). Thresholds and breakpoints in ecosystems with a multiplicity of stable states. Nature, 269, 471–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, K. (2000). The diversity–stability debate. Nature, 405, 228–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCann, K., Rasmussen, J., Umbanhowar, J., and Chase, J. (2005). The dynamics of spatially coupled food webs. Ecology Letters, 8, 513–523.Google Scholar
McConkey, K. and Drake, D. (2006). Flying foxes cease to function as seed dispersers long before they become rare. Ecology, 87, 271–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McConkey, K. and O’Farrill, G. (2015). Cryptic function loss in animal populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 30, 182–189.Google Scholar
Miller, T. and Rudolf, V. (2011). Thinking inside the box: community-level consequences of stage-structured populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 26, 457–466.Google Scholar
Mougi, A. and Kondoh, M. (2013). Diversity of interaction types and ecological community stability. Science, 337, 349–351.Google Scholar
Myers, R. and Worm, B. (2003). Rapid worldwide depletion of predatory fish communities. Nature, 423, 280–283.Google Scholar
Neutel, A., Heesterbeek, J., and de Ruiter, P. (2002). Stability in real food webs: weak links in long loops. Science, 296, 1120–1123.Google Scholar
Novaro, A., Funes, M., and Walker, S. (2000). Ecological extinction of native prey of a carnivore assemblage in Argentine Patagonia. Biological Conservation, 92, 25–33.Google Scholar
Pereira, H., Leadley, P., Proenca, V., et al. (2010). Scenarios for global biodiversity in the 21st century. Science, 330, 1496–1501.Google Scholar
Petchey, O., Eklöf, A., Borrvall, C., and Ebenman, B. (2008). Trophically unique species are vulnerable to cascading extinction. American Naturalist, 171, 568–579.Google Scholar
Pimm, S. (1980). Food web design and the effects of species deletion. Oikos, 35, 139–149.Google Scholar
Pimm, S., Jenkins, C., Abell, R., et al. (2014). The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science, 344, 1246752.Google Scholar
Redford, K. and Feinsinger, P. (2001). The half-empty forest: sustainable use and the ecology of interactions. In Conservation of Exploited Species, ed. Reynolds, D., Mace, G., Redfor, K., and Robinson, J.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 370–399.Google Scholar
Ripple, W., Estes, J., Bechta, R., et al. (2014). Status and ecological effects of the world’s largest carnivores. Science, 342, 1241484.Google Scholar
Rudolf, V. and Lafferty, K. (2011). Stage structure alters how complexity affects stability of ecological networks. Ecology Letters, 14, 75–79.Google Scholar
Sabo, J. (2008). Population viability and species interactions: life outside the single-species vacuum. Biological Conservation, 14, 276–286.Google Scholar
Sanders, D., Sutter, L., and van Veen, F. (2013). The loss of indirect interactions leads to cascading extinctions of carnivores. Ecology Letters, 16, 664–669.Google Scholar
Sanders, D., Kehoe, R., and van Veen, F. (2015). Experimental evidence for the population-dynamic mechanisms underlying extinction cascades of carnivores. Current Biology, 25, 1–4.Google Scholar
Säterberg, T., Sellman, S., and Ebenman, B. (2013). High frequency of functional extinctions in ecological networks. Nature, 499, 468–470.Google Scholar
Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J., Folke, C., and Walker, B. (2001). Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature, 413, 591–596.Google Scholar
Schipper, J., Chanson, J., Chiozza, T., et al. (2008). The status of the world’s land and marine mammals: diversity, threat, and knowledge. Science, 322, 225–230.Google Scholar
Sekercioglu, C., Daily, G., and Ehrlich, P. (2004). Ecosystem consequences of bird declines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 18042–18047.Google Scholar
Sellman, S., Säterberg, T., and Ebenman, B. (2015) Pattern of functional extinctions in ecological networks with a variety of interaction types. Theoretical Ecology, DOI 10.1007/s12080-015–0275-7.Google Scholar
Shaffer, M. L. (1981). Minimum population sizes for species conservation. BioScience, 31, 131–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A., Brown, C., Bulman, C., et al. (2011). Impact of fishing low-trophic level species on marine ecosystems. Science, 333, 1147–1150.Google Scholar
Solé, R. and Montoya, J. (2001). Complexity and fragility in ecological networks Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 268, 2039–2045.Google Scholar
Soulé, M., Estes, J., Berger, J., and Martinez Del Rio, C. (2003). Ecological effectiveness: conservation goals for interactive species. Conservation Biology, 17, 1238–1250.Google Scholar
Soulé, M., Estes, J., Miller, B., and Honnold, D. (2005). Strongly interacting species: conservation policy, management, and ethics. BioScience, 55, 168–176.Google Scholar
Stouffer, D. and Bascompte, J. (2011). Compartmentalization increases food-web persistence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 3648–3652.Google Scholar
Thebault, E. and Fontaine, C. (2010). Stability of ecological communities and the architecture of mutualistic and trophic networks. Science, 329, 853–856.Google Scholar
Thebault, E., Huber, V., and Loreau, M. (2007). Cascading extinctions and ecosystem functioning: contrasting effects of diversity depending on food web structure. Oikos, 116, 163–173.Google Scholar
Werner, E. and Gilliam, J. (1984). The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 15, 393–425.Google Scholar
Wilmers, C., Post, E., Peterson, R., and Vucetich, J. (2006). Predator disease out-break modulates top–down, bottom–up and climatic effects on herbivore population dynamics. Ecology Letters, 9, 383–389.Google Scholar
Wollrab, S., Diehl, S., and de Roos, A. (2012). Simple rules describe bottom–up and top–down control in food webs with alternative energy pathways. Ecology Letters, 15, 935–946.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×