Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T21:13:45.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Do values subjectively define the limits to climate change adaptation?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2009

W. Neil Adger
Affiliation:
University of East Anglia
Irene Lorenzoni
Affiliation:
University of East Anglia
Karen L. O'Brien
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Oslo
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Climate change adaptation is increasingly seen as both a necessary and urgent response to a changing climate, and much research is being undertaken to identify barriers and constraints to successful adaptation. Most discussions focus on limited adaptive capacity as a constraint to adaptation to climate change, and emphasise technological, financial and institutional barriers (Grothmann and Patt, 2005; Yohe and Tol, 2002). It is presumed that once these external barriers are removed or overcome, society will be able to successfully adapt to a changing climate. It has, however, also been suggested that adaptation to climate change may be limited by the irreversible loss of places and identities that people value (Adger et al., 2009a, 2009b). Adger et al. (2009b) argue that social and individual characteristics may likewise act as deep-seated barriers to adaptation. Such perspectives raise important questions about the role that individual and societal values play in adapting to climate change: is adaptation a successful strategy for maintaining what is valued? How do adaptation measures taken by some affect the values of others? In the case of value conflicts, whose values count?

Values are, in effect, an interior and subjective dimension of adaptation. In contrast to systems and behaviours that can be objectively measured and observed, values subjectively influence the adaptations that are considered desirable and thus prioritised.

Type
Chapter
Information
Adapting to Climate Change
Thresholds, Values, Governance
, pp. 164 - 180
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adger, W. N., Agrawala, S., Mirza, M. M. Q., Conde, C., O'Brien, K., Pulhin, J., Pulwarty, R., Smit, B. and Takahashi, K. 2007. ‘Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity’, in Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., Linden, P. J. and Hanson, C. E. (eds.) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 717–743.Google Scholar
Adger, W. N., Barnett, J. and Ellemor, H. 2009a. ‘Unique and valued places at risk’, in Schneider, S. H., Rosencranz, A. and Mastrandrea, M. (eds.) Climate Change Science and Policy. Washington, DC: Island Press, in press.Google Scholar
Adger, W. N., Dessai, S., Goulden, M., Hulme, M., Lorenzoni, I., Nelson, D., Naess, L.-O., Wolf, J. and Wreford, A. 2009b. ‘Are there social limits to adaptation?’, Climatic Change, 93: 335–354.
Antrop, M. 2005. ‘Why landscapes of the past are important for the future’, Landscape and Urban Planning 70: 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aukrust, V. G. and Snow, C. E. 1998. ‘Narratives and explanations during mealtime conversations in Norway and the US’, Language in Society 27: 221–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardi, A. and Schwartz, S. H. 2003. ‘Values and behavior: strength and structure of relations’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29: 1207–1220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bæck, U. N. 2004. ‘The urban ethos’, Nordic Journal of Youth Research 12: 99–115.Google Scholar
Botten, G., Elvbakken, K. T. and Kildal, N. 2003. ‘The Norwegian welfare state on the threshold of a new century’, Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 31: 81–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edlund, J. 1999. ‘Trust in government and welfare: attitudes to redistribution and financial cheating in the USA and Norway’, European Journal of Political Research 35: 341–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, T. H. 1993. ‘Being Norwegian in a shrinking world: reflections on Norwegian identity’, in Kiel, A. C. (ed.) Continuity and Change: Aspects of Modern Norway. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, pp. 11–37.Google Scholar
Gecas, V. 2008. ‘The ebb and flow of sociological interest in values’, Sociological Forum 23: 344–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grothmann, T. and Patt, A. 2005. ‘Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change’, Global Environmental Change 15: 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gullestad, M. 1996. ‘From obedience to negotiation: dilemmas in the transmission of values between generations in Norway’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2: 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, M. M., Bitz, C. M. and Tremblay, B. 2006. ‘Future abrupt reductions in the summer Arctic sea ice’, Geophysical Research Letters 33: L23504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in Forty-Three Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. 2000. ‘Globalization and post-modern values’, Washington Quarterly 23: 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R. and Baker, W. E. 2000. ‘Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values’, American Sociological Review 65: 19–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R. and Welzel, C. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearney, M. 1984. World View. Novato: Chandler and Sharp.Google Scholar
Kegan, R. 1982. The Evolving Self: Problem and Process in Human Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kegan, R. 1994. In Over Our Heads: The Mental Demands of Modern Life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Leirvik, O. 1999. ‘State, church and Muslim minority in Norway’, paper presented at the Dialogue of Cultures Conference, 21–23 April 1999, Berlin.
Lindland, J. 1998. ‘Non-trade concerns in a multifunctional agriculture: implications for agricultural policy and multilateral trading system’, paper presented at OECD Workshop on Emerging Trade Issues in Agriculture, 26–27 October 1998, Paris.
Lund, M. 1996. ‘A short history of Alpine skiing’, Skiing Heritage 8: 1. Available at www.skiinghistory.org/history.htmlGoogle Scholar
Maslow, A. H. 1970. Motivation and Personality. London: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. J., Canziani, O. F., Leary, N. A., Dokken, D. J. and White, K. S. (eds.) 2001. Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Næss, L. O., Bang, G., Eriksen, S. and Vevatne, J. 2005. ‘Institutional adaptation to climate change: flood responses at the municipal level in Norway’, Global Environmental Change 15: 125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naugle, D. K. 2002. Worldview: The History of a Concept. Cambridge: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
O'Brien, K. L., Sygna, L. and Haugen, J. E. 2004. ‘Resilient or vulnerable? a multi-scale assessment of climate impacts and vulnerability in Norway’, Climatic Change 64: 193–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pakizeh, A., Gebauer, J. E. and Maio, G. R. 2007. ‘Basic human values: inter-value structure in memory’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43: 458–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RegClim, 2005. RegClim: Norges klima om 100 år: Usikkerheter og risiko. Oslo, Norway. Available at http://reglim.met.noGoogle Scholar
Reinert, E. S., Aslaksen, I., Eira, I. M. G., Mathiesen, S., Reinert, H. and Turi, E. I. 2008. Adapting to Climate Change in Reindeer Herding: The Nation–State as Problem and Solution, Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics No. 16. Norway: The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn: Tallinn University of Technology.
Riese, H. and Vorkinn, M. 2002. ‘The production of meaning in outdoor recreation: a study of Norwegian practice’, Norwegian Journal of Geography 56: 199–206.Google Scholar
Rohan, M. J. 2000. ‘A rose by any name? The values construct’, Personal and Social Psychology Review 4: 255–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rokeach, M. 1973. The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rokeach, M. (ed.) 1979. Understanding Human Values: Individual and Societal. New York: Free Press.
Rokeach, M. 2000. Understanding Human Values, 2nd edn. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Sandell, K. 1993. ‘Outdoor recreation and the Nordic tradition of “friluftsliv”: a source of inspiration for a sustainable society’, Trumpeter10. Available at: www.icaap.org/iuicode?6.10.1.10Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. 1994. ‘Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values?’, Journal of Social Issues 50: 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. 1996. ‘Value priorities and behaviour’, in Seligman, C., Olson, J. M. and Zanna, M. P. (eds.) The Psychology of Values, Ontario Symposium, vol. 8. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. 2006. ‘Les valeurs de base de la personne: théorie, mesures et applications’ (‘Basic human values: theory, measurement and applications’), Revue française de sociologie4. (English version available at www.fmag.unict.it/Allegati/convegno%207-8-10-05/Schwartzpaper.pdf)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seligman, C. and Katz, A. N. 1996. ‘The dynamics of value systems’, in Seligman, C., Olson, J. M. and Zanna, M. P. (eds.) The Psychology of Values, Ontario Symposium, vol. 8. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 53–75.Google Scholar
Sire, J. W. 2004. Naming the Elephant: Worldview as a Concept. Downers Grove: IVP Academic.Google Scholar
Slagsvold, B. and Strand, N. P. 2005. ‘Morgendagens eldre: blir de mer kravstore og mindre beskjedne?’ in Slagsvold, B. and Solem, P. E. (eds.) Morgendagens Eldre: En Sammenligning av Verdier, Holdninger og Atferd Blant Dagens Middelaldrende og Eldre, Nova Report No. 11/05. Oslo: NOVA, pp. 23–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Statistics Norway 1996. Values in Norway 1996, Notes 97/19. Oslo: Statistics Norway.Google Scholar
Støre, J. G. 2006. ‘Å skape et nytt og større “vi”’, speech delivered by Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Støre on 8 December 2006. Available at www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/ud/dep/utenriksminister_jonas_gahr_store/taler_artikler/2006/A-skape-et-nytt-og-storre-vi.html?id=437985
Toman, M. 2006. ‘Values in the economics of climate change’, Environmental Values 15: 365–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilber, K. 2000. Integral Psychology: Consciousness, Spirit, Psychology, Therapy. Boston: Shambhala.Google Scholar
Wilber, K. 2007. Integral Spirituality: A Startling New Role for Religion in the Modern and Postmodern World. Boston: Integral Books.Google Scholar
Williams, R. M. 1979. ‘Change and stability in values and value systems: a sociological perspective’, in Rokeach, M. (ed.) Understanding Human Values: Individual and Societal. New York: Free Press, pp. 15–46.
Yohe, G. and Tol, R. S. J. 2002. ‘Indicators for social and economic coping capacity: moving toward a working definition of adaptive capacity’, Global Environmental Change 12: 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×