Book contents
- Worlds of Natural History
- Advance praise for Worlds of Natural History
- Frontispiece
- Worlds of Natural History
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Plates
- Figures
- Notes on contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- I Early modern ventures
- II Enlightened orders
- III Publics and empires
- IV Connecting and conserving
- Epilogue
- Notes
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
II - Enlightened orders
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 December 2018
Book contents
- Worlds of Natural History
- Advance praise for Worlds of Natural History
- Frontispiece
- Worlds of Natural History
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Plates
- Figures
- Notes on contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- I Early modern ventures
- II Enlightened orders
- III Publics and empires
- IV Connecting and conserving
- Epilogue
- Notes
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Worlds of Natural History , pp. 149 - 286Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Further reading
Bleichmar, D., Visible Empire: Botanical Expeditions and Visual Culture in the Hispanic Enlightenment (Chicago, 2012).
Farber, P. L. ‘The development of taxidermy and the history of ornithology’, Isis, 68 (1977), pp. 550–66.
Findlen, P., Possessing Nature: Museums, Collecting and Scientific Culture in Early Modern Italy (Berkeley, 1994).
Hunter, M., Walker, A. and MacGregor, A. (eds.), From Books to Bezoars: Sir Hans Sloane and His Collections (London, 2012).
Margócsy, D., Commercial Visions: Science, Trade and Visual Culture in the Dutch Golden Age (Chicago, 2014).
Mason, P., Before Disenchantment: Images of Exotic Plants and Animals in the Early Modern World (London, 2009).
Price, D., ‘John Woodward and a surviving British geological collection from the early eighteenth century’, Journal of the History of Collections, 1 (1989), pp. 79–95.
Prince, S. A. (ed.), Stuffing Birds, Pressing Plants, Shaping Knowledge: Natural History in North America 1730–1860 (Philadelphia, 2003).
Schiebinger, L., Plants and Empire: Colonial Bioprospecting in the Atlantic World (Cambridge, 2014).
Schulze-Hagen, K., Steinheimer, F., Kinzelbach, R. and Gasser, C., ‘Avian taxidermy in Europe from the Middle Ages to the Renaissance’, Journal für Ornithologie, 144 (2003), pp. 459–78.
Spary, E. C., Utopia’s Garden: French Natural History from Old Regime to Revolution (Chicago, 2000).
Stearns, R. P., ‘James Petiver: promoter of natural science, c. 1663–1718’, Proceedings of the American Antiquarian Society, 62 (1953), pp. 243–365.The materials of natural history
Further reading
Daston, L., ‘Attention and the values of nature in the Enlightenment’, in Daston, L. and Vidal, F. (eds.), The Moral Authority of Nature (Chicago, 2004), pp. 100–26.
Dawson, V., Nature’s Enigma: The Problem of the Polyp in the Letters of Bonnet, Trembley and Réaumur (Philadelphia, 1987).
Gibson, S., Animal, Vegetable or Mineral? How Eighteenth-Century Science Disrupted the Natural Order (Oxford, 2015).
Kellman, J., ‘Nature, networks and expert testimony in the colonial Atlantic: the case of cochineal’, Atlantic Studies, 7 (2010), pp. 373–95.
Ratcliff, M., ‘Trembley’s strategy of generosity and the scope of celebrity in the mid-eighteenth century’, Isis, 95 (2004), pp. 555–75.
Ratcliff, M., The Quest for the Invisible: Microscopy in the Enlightenment (Burlington, VT, 2009).
Stockland, E., ‘“La guerre aux insectes”: pest control and agricultural reform in the French Enlightenment’, Annals of Science, 70:4 (2013), pp. 1–26.
Terrall, M., ‘Following insects around: tools and techniques of natural history in the 18th century’, British Journal for the History of Science, 43 (2010), pp. 573–88.
Terrall, M., ‘Frogs on the mantelpiece: the practice of observation in daily life’, in Daston, L. and Lunbeck, E. (eds.), Histories of Scientific Observations (Chicago, 2011), pp. 185–205.
Terrall, M., Catching Nature in the Act: Réaumur and the Practice of Natural History in the Eighteenth Century (Chicago, 2014).
Further reading
Bredekamp, H., The Lure of Antiquity and the Cult of the Machine: The Kunstkammer and the Evolution of Nature, Art and Technology (Princeton, 1993).
Daston, L. and Park, K., Wonders and the Order of Nature, 1150–1750 (New York, 1998).
Findlen, P. and Smith, P. H. (eds.), Merchants and Marvels: Commerce, Science and Art in Early Modern Europe (New York, 2002).
Freedberg, D., The Eye of the Lynx: Galileo, his Friends, and the Beginnings of Modern Natural History (Chicago, 2002).
Herzog, Anton-Ulrich-Museum Braunschweig and Kunstmuseum, des Landes Niedersachsen, Weltenharmonie. Die Kunstkammer und die Ordnung des Wissens (Braunschweig, 2000).
Kistemaker, R. E., Kopaneva, N. P, Meijers, D. J. and Vilmbakhov, G. V. (eds.), The Paper Museum of the the Academy of Sciences in St Petersburg c. 1725–1760 (St Petersburg, 2005).
Marx, B. and Rehberg, K.-S. (eds.),Sammeln als Institution. Von der fürstlichen Wunderkammer zum Mäzenatentum des Staates (München and Berlin, 2007).
Ogilvie, B. W., The Science of Describing: Natural History in Renaissance Europe (Chicago, 2006).
te Heesen, A. and Spary, E. C. (eds.), Sammeln als Wissen. Das Sammeln und seine wissenschaftsgeschichtliche Bedeutung (Göttingen, 2001) Spatial arrangement and systematic order.
Further reading
Blair, A., ‘Note taking as an art of transmission’, Critical Inquiry, 31 (2004), pp. 85–107.
Daston, L., ‘Taking note(s)’, Isis, 95 (2004), pp. 443–8.
Delbourgo, J. and Müller-Wille, S., ‘Introduction to focus section “Listmania”’, Isis, 103 (2012), pp. 710–15.
Krämer, F., ‘Ulisse Aldrovandi’s Pandechion Epistemonicon and the use of paper technology in Renaissance natural history’, Early Science and Medicine, 19 (2014), pp. 398–423.
McOuat, G. R., ‘Cataloguing power: delineating “competent naturalists” and the meaning of species in the British Museum’, British Journal for the History of Science, 34 (2001), pp. 1–28.
te Heesen, A., The World in a Box: The Story of an Eighteenth-Century Picture Encyclopedia (Chicago, 2002).
Thomas, J. M., ‘The documentation of the British Museum’s natural history collections, 1760–1836’, Archives of Natural History, 39 (2012), pp. 111–25.
Further reading
Bleichmar, D., Visible Empire: Botanical Expeditions and Visual Culture in the Hispanic Enlightenment (Chicago, 2012).
Blunt, W. and Stearn, W. T., The Art of Botanical Illustration (London, 1994).
Charmantier, I., ‘Carl Linnaeus and the visual representation of nature’, Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, 41 (2011), pp. 365–404.
Cooper, A., Inventing the Indigenous: Local Knowledge and Natural History in Early Modern Europe (Cambridge, 2007).
Daston, L. and Galison, P., Objectivity (New York, 2007).
Desmond, R., Great Natural History Books and their Creators (London, 2003).
Lack, H.-W., The Bauers. Joseph, Franz & Ferdinand: Masters of Botanical Illustration (London, 2015).
Nickelsen, K., Draughtsmen, Botanists and Nature: The Construction of Eighteenth-Century Botanical Illustrations (Dordrecht, 2006).
Further reading
Barrera-Osorio, A., Experiencing Nature: The Spanish American Empire and the Early Scientific Revolution (Austin, 2006).
Batsaki, Y., Burke Cahalane, S. and Tchikine, A. (eds.), The Botany of Empire in the Long Eighteenth Century (Dumbarton Oaks, 2017).
Bleichmar, D., Visible Empire: Botanical Expeditions and Visual Culture in the Hispanic Enlightenment (Chicago, 2012).
Cañizares-Esguerra, J., Nature, Empire, and Nation: Explorations of the History of Science in the Iberian World (Stanford, 2006).
Drayton, R., Nature’s Government: Science, Imperial Britain and the ‘Improvement’ of the World (New Haven, 2000).
Lafuente, A., ‘Enlightenment in an imperial context: local science in the late eighteenth-century Hispanic world’, Osiris, 15 (2000), pp. 155–73.
Pimentel, J., ‘The Iberian vision: science and empire in the framework of a universal monarchy, 1500–1800’, Osiris, 15 (2000), pp. 17–30.
Schiebinger, L. and Swan, C. (eds.), Colonial Botany: Science, Commerce and Politics in the Early Modern World (Philadelphia, 2005).
Further reading
Grigson, C., Menagerie: The History of Exotic Animals in England (Cambridge, 2016).
Lothar, D. and Rieke-Müller, A., Unterwegs mit wilden Tieren: Wandermenagerien zwischen Belehrung und Kommerz 1750–1850 (Marburg, 1999).
Plumb, C., The Georgian Menagerie: Exotic Animals in Eighteenth-Century London (London, 2015).
Robbins, L., Elephant Slaves and Pampered Parrots: Exotic Animals in Eighteenth-Century Paris (Baltimore, 2002).
Tague, I., Animal Companions: Pets and Social Change in Eighteenth-Century Britain (University Park, PA, 2015).
Velten, H., Beastly London: A History of Animals in the City (London, 2013).
Further reading
Carney, J. A. and Rosomoff, R. N., In the Shadow of Slavery: Africa’s Botanical Legacy in the Atlantic World (Berkeley, 2009).
Dettelbach, M., ‘Humboldtian science’, in Jardine, N., Secord, J. A. and Spary, E. C. (eds.), Cultures of Natural History(Cambridge, 1996), pp. 287–304.
Drayton, R., Nature’s Government: Science, Imperial Britain and the ‘Improvement’ of the World (New Haven, 2000).
Grove, R. H., Green Imperialism: Colonial Expansion, Tropical Island Edens and the Origins of Environmentalism, 1600–1860 (Cambridge, 1995).
Humboldt, A. von and Bonpland, A., Essay on the Geography of Plants (1807; Chicago, 2009).
Miller, D. P. and Reill, P. H. (eds.), Visions of Empire: Voyages, Botany and Representations of Nature (Cambridge, 1996).
Ogborn, M., ‘T85:211alking plants: botany and speech in eighteenth-century Jamaica’, 82:313 History of Science, 51 (2013), pp. 251–82.
Schiebinger, L. and Swan, C. (eds.), Colonial Botany: Science, Commerce and Politics in the Early Modern World (Philadelphia, 2005).