Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-05T13:27:43.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Maine and the theory of progress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2009

Alan Diamond
Affiliation:
Trinity College, Cambridge
Get access

Summary

As is well known, Maine's attitude to progress was complex and not entirely consistent. He was firm in his belief that there had been progress, but he was not clear how or why this had happened, nor — unlike some eminent contemporaries — was he confident that there was some general law of evolution which ensured the passage from a non-progressive to a progressive condition of society. Maine's use of the comparative method, and the generally positivistic or scientific bent of his approach, implied and perhaps even required some such general laws of social development (Burrow, 1966: 164). But this positivism — expressed at its clearest and most confident in his ‘Address to the University of Calcutta’ (1865) — warred with Maine's equally fervent devotion to the historical approach. The English scientist in him, with his desire to establish laws of society similar to those of the physical sciences, sat rather awkwardly alongside a German Romantic historicist who passionately insisted on the unique and the particular in the varied patterns of human social evolution.

The historical approach could show connection and continuity between past and present — could show this even between phenomena so apparently disparate as Indian communal customs, the practices of early Teutonic communities, Roman codes and English common law. It could document the fact of progress, the progress from a ‘closed’ to an ‘open’ society, from one based on ‘status’ to one based on ‘contract’, that could manifestly be shown to have occurred within Aryan civilization.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Victorian Achievement of Sir Henry Maine
A Centennial Reappraisal
, pp. 76 - 87
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×