Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T04:39:45.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Protection of the vulnerable in financial transactions – what the common law vitiating factors can do for you

from PART II - Conceptualising unconscionability in financial transactions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2010

By
David Capper
Edited by
Mel Kenny ,
James Devenney  and
Lorna Fox O'Mahony
Mel Kenny
Affiliation:
University of Leicester
James Devenney
Affiliation:
University of Durham
Lorna Fox O'Mahony
Affiliation:
University of Essex
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This collection of essays is concerned with the protection of the vulnerable in financial transactions, and specifically examines the role of unconscionability in those transactions. We should understand ‘financial transactions’ in a broad sense, as any contract involving valuable assets and requiring significant expertise in assessing the wisdom of entering into it. We should understand vulnerability in a broad sense too. A clear picture of this is presented by the Australian doctrine of unconscionable dealing which makes much use of the concept of ‘special disadvantage’, described by Kitto J in Blomley v. Ryan as ‘illness, ignorance, inexperience, impaired faculties, financial need or other circumstances’ that affect a person's ability to conserve their own interests. Unconscionability in this context and other contexts relevant to this chapter consists of taking unfair advantage of vulnerability.

This chapter will examine the grounds upon which the common law may be prepared to rescind or grant other relief to a vulnerable contracting party because of some occurrence in making the contract. These grounds are commonly referred to as ‘vitiating factors’. Five are commonly recognised – mistake, misrepresentation, duress, undue influence, and unconscionable dealing. In turn these can be sub-divided into two classes – mistake and unfair influence. Mistake contains the vitiating factor of ‘mistake’ itself as well as misrepresentation as a form of induced mistake. Unfair influence consists of all the others.

Type
Chapter
Information
Unconscionability in European Private Financial Transactions
Protecting the Vulnerable
 , pp. 166 - 183
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Waddams, S. M., ‘Unconscionability in Contracts’ (1976) 39 Modern Law Review369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enonchong, N., Duress Undue Influence and Unconscionable Dealing (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2006) 349–50Google Scholar
Bigwood, R., ‘Contracts by Unfair Advantage: From Exploitation to Transactional Neglect’ (2005) 25 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigwood, R., ‘Conscience and the Liberal Conception of Contract: Observing Basic Distinctions Part II’ (2000) 16 Journal of Contract Law191Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, J., ‘Rescission as a Self-Help Remedy: A Critical Analysis’ (2000) 59 Cambridge Law Journal509–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, J. and Keyser, A., ‘Justifying Partial Rescission in English Law’ (2005) 121 Law Quarterly Review273Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, D., Elliott, S. and Zakrzewski, R., The Law of Rescission (Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar
Burrows, A., ‘We Do This at Common Law but That in Equity’ (2002) 22 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capper, D., ‘Reconfiguring Mistake in Contract Formation’, in Bryan, M., Private Law in Theory and Practice (Routledge Cavendish, 2006) 119Google Scholar
Burrows, A., ‘Construction and Rectification’, in Burrows, A. and Peel, E. (eds.), Contract Terms (Oxford University Press, 2007) 77Google Scholar
McLauchlan, D. W., ‘The “Drastic” Remedy of Rectification for Unilateral Mistake’ (2008) 124 Law Quarterly Review608Google Scholar
MacMillan, C., ‘Rogues, Swindlers and Cheats: The Development of Mistake of Identity in English Contract Law’ (2005) 64 Cambridge Law Journal711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLauchlan, D. W., ‘Mistake of Identity in Contract Formation’ (2005) 21 Journal of Contract Law1Google Scholar
Cartwright, J., Misrepresentation Mistake and Non-Disclosure, 2nd edn (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2007) 2.02–03Google Scholar
Poole, J. and Devenney, J., ‘Reforming Damages for Misrepresentation: the Case for Coherent Aims and Principles’ (2007) Journal of Business Law269Google Scholar
Birks, P., ‘Undue Influence as Wrongful Exploitation’ (2004) 120 Law Quarterly Review34Google Scholar
Birks, P., Unjust Enrichment, 2nd edn (Oxford: Clarendon, 2005) 176–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, J., Gain-Based Damages (Oxford: Hart, 2002) 53Google Scholar
McKendrick, E., ‘The Further Travails of Duress’, in Burrows, A. S. and Rodger, A. (eds.), Mapping the Law: Essays in Memory of Peter Birks (Oxford University Press, 2006) 181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. A., ‘Contracting Under Pressure: A Theory of Duress’ (1997) 56 Cambridge Law Journal343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atiyah, P. S., ‘Economic Duress and the Overborne Will’ (1982) 98 Law Quarterly Review197Google Scholar
Birks, P. and Chin, N. Y., ‘On the Nature of Undue Influence’, in Beatson, J. and Friedmann, D. (eds.), Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law (Oxford University Press, 1995) 57Google Scholar
Devenney, J. and Chandler, A., ‘Unconscionability and the Taxonomy of Undue Influence’ (2007) Journal of Business Law541Google Scholar
Mitchell, C. and Mitchell, P., Landmark Cases in the Law of Restitution (Oxford: Hart, 2006) 183Google Scholar
Birks, P., ‘Unjust Factors and Wrongs: Pecuniary Rescission for Undue Influence’ (1997) 5 Restitution Law Review72Google Scholar
Capper, D., ‘Undue Influence and Unconscionability: A Rationalisation’ (1998) 114 Law Quarterly Review479Google Scholar
Chen-Wishart, M., ‘Undue Influence: Vindicating Relationships of Influence’ (2006) 59 Current Legal Problems231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldham, M., ‘If at First … Undue Influence and the House of Lords’ (2002) 61 Cambridge Law Journal29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, M. P., ‘Wives, Sureties and Banks’ (2002) Conveyancer and Property Lawyer174Google Scholar
Wong, S., ‘Revisiting Barclays Bank v. O'Brien and Independent Legal Advice for Vulnerable Sureties’ (2002) Journal of Business Law439Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, D., ‘Developing O'Brien’ (2002) 118 Law Quarterly Review337Google Scholar
Phang, A. and Tjio, H., ‘The Uncertain Boundaries of Undue Influence’ (2002) Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly231Google Scholar
Burns, Fiona R., ‘The Elderly and Undue Influence Inter Vivos’ (2003) Legal Studies251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehlberg, B., Sexually Transmitted Debt (Oxford University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Capper, D., ‘Banks, Borrowers, Sureties and Undue Influence – A Half-Baked Solution to a Thoroughly Cooked Problem’ (2002) 10 Restitution Law Review100Google Scholar
Capper, D., ‘Unconscionable Bargains’, in Dawson, N., Greer, D. and Ingram, P. (eds.), One Hundred and Fifty Years of Irish Law (SLS, 1996) 44Google Scholar
Bamforth, N., ‘Unconscionability as a Vitiating Factor’ (1995) Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly538Google Scholar
McMurtry, L., ‘Unconscionability and Undue Influence: An Interaction?’ (2000) Conveyancer and Property Lawyer573Google Scholar
Devenney, J. P., ‘A Pack of Unruly Dogs: Unconscionable Bargains, Lawful Act (Economic) Duress and Clogs on the Equity of Redemption’ (2002) Journal of Business Law539Google Scholar
Phang, A., ‘Undue Influence – Methodology, Sources and Linkages’ (1995) Journal of Business Law552Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×