Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- A note on references, quotations, names and pronouns
- Introduction
- 1 The fall of pessimism and the rise of New Bibliography, 1902–1942
- 2 New techniques and the Virginian School: New Bibliography 1939–1968
- 3 New Bibliography 1969–1979
- Intermezzo: the rise and fall of the theory of memorial reconstruction
- 4 New Bibliography critiqued and revised, 1980–1990
- 5 The ‘new’ New Bibliography: the Oxford Complete Works, 1978–1989
- 6 Materialism, unediting and version-editing, 1990–1999
- Conclusion: the twenty-first century
- Appendix 1 How early modern books were made: a brief guide
- Appendix 2 Table of Shakespeare editions up to 1623
- Appendix 3 Editorial principles of the major twentieth-century Shakespeare editions
- Works cited
- Index
- References
Works cited
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 December 2010
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- A note on references, quotations, names and pronouns
- Introduction
- 1 The fall of pessimism and the rise of New Bibliography, 1902–1942
- 2 New techniques and the Virginian School: New Bibliography 1939–1968
- 3 New Bibliography 1969–1979
- Intermezzo: the rise and fall of the theory of memorial reconstruction
- 4 New Bibliography critiqued and revised, 1980–1990
- 5 The ‘new’ New Bibliography: the Oxford Complete Works, 1978–1989
- 6 Materialism, unediting and version-editing, 1990–1999
- Conclusion: the twenty-first century
- Appendix 1 How early modern books were made: a brief guide
- Appendix 2 Table of Shakespeare editions up to 1623
- Appendix 3 Editorial principles of the major twentieth-century Shakespeare editions
- Works cited
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Struggle for Shakespeare's TextTwentieth-Century Editorial Theory and Practice, pp. 272 - 308Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
. 1942. The Globe Playhouse: Its Design and Equipment. Cambridge MA. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1928. ‘Dramatic Publication in England, 1580–1640: A Reply [to W. W. Greg's Review].’ Review of English Studies. o.s. 4. 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1924a. ‘2 Henry VI and the Copy for The Contention (1594).’ Times Literary Supplement Number 1186 (9 October). 629–30.
. 1924b. ‘3 Henry VI and Richard, Duke of York.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 1191 (13 November). 730.
. 1926. ‘The Taming of a Shrew.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 1285 (16 September). 614.
. 1928. ‘The Taming of a Shrew: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 1375 (7 June). 430.
. 1929. Shakespeare's Henry VI and Richard III. Introd. Alfred W. Pollard. Shakespeare Problems 3. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1600. Englands Parnassus: Or the Choysest Flowers of Our Moderne Poets. STC 378. London. N[icholas] L[ing], C[uthbert] B[urby] and T[homas] H[ayes].
. 1594. A Pleasant Conceited Historie, Called The Taming of a Shrew. STC 23667 BEPD 120a. London. Peter Short sold by Cuthbert Burbie.
. 1929. The First Part of the Reign of King Richard the Second, or Thomas of Woodstock. Ed. . Malone Society Reprints. London. Malone Society.Google Scholar
. 1938 for 1937. Charlemagne, or the Distracted Emperor. Ed. . Malone Society Reprints. London. Malone Society.Google Scholar
. 1972. ‘“Texts and Editors”: Review of Proof: The Yearbook of American Bibliographical and Textual Studies volume 1 (1971) and Studies in Bibliography volume 25 (1972).’ Times Literary Supplement Number 3666 (2 June). 640.
(ed.). 1876. A Transcript of the Registers of the Company of Stationers of London 1554–1640 AD. Vol. 3: Text. Entries of Books to 11 July 1620; Entries of Freemen to 31 December 1640; Succession of Master Printers in London 1586–1636. 5 vols. London. Privately printed.
1942. ‘Evidence and Inference in Bibliography.’ English Institute Annual volume for 1941. 159–81.
. 1607. The Divils Charter: A Tragaedie Conteining the Life and Death of Pope Alexander the Sixt. STC 1466 BEPD 252a(i). London. G[eorge] E[ld] for John Wright.
. 1904. The Devil's Charter. Ed. R. B. McKerrow. Materialien zur kunde des alteren englischen Drama 6. Louvain. A. Uystpruyst.Google Scholar
1935. ‘“The Genuine Text”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 1736 (9 May). 301.
2001. ‘Renaissance Dramatists and the Texts of Their Plays.’ Research Opportunities in Renaissance Drama 40. 1–24.Google Scholar
1919a. ‘Shakespeare's Hand in the Play of “Sir Thomas More”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 904 (15 May). 265.
1919b. ‘Shakespeare's Hand in the Play of “Sir Thomas More”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 906 (29 May). 295.
and . 1966. The Dramatic Works in the Beaumont and Fletcher Canon. Ed. . Vol. 1: The Knight of the Burning Pestle; The Masque of the Inner Temple and Gray's Inn; The Woman Hater; The Coxcomb; Philaster; The Captain. 10 vols. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
and . 1989. The Dramatic Works in the Beaumont and Fletcher Canon. Ed. . Vol. 7: Henry VIII; The Two Noble Kinsmen; Wit at Several Weapons; The Nice Valour; The Night Walker; A Very Woman. 10 vols. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1971. The Profession of Dramatist in Shakespeare's Time, 1590–1642. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
1979. ‘The Printing of Henry V, Q1.’ The Library (=Transactions of the Bibliographical Society). 6th series (=4th of Transactions of the Bibliographical Society) 1. 114–25.Google Scholar
1989. ‘Review of William Shakespeare, The Complete Works, ed. , , and (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986) and William Shakespeare, The Complete Works: Original Spelling Edition, ed. Stanley Wells, Gary Taylor, John Jowett and William Montgomery (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986) and Stanley Wells, Gary Taylor, John Jowett and William Montgomery, William Shakespeare: A Textual Companion (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987).’ Analytical and Enumerative Bibliography. New Series 3. 139–70.Google Scholar
. 1981. White Spaces in Shakespeare: The Development of the Modern Text. Cleveland OH. Bellflower.Google Scholar
. 1987. ‘“Determining the Indeterminate”: Review of William Shakespeare, The Complete Works, ed. , , and (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986) and Stanley Wells, Gary Taylor, John Jowett and William Montgomery, William Shakespeare: A Textual Companion (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987).’ Shakespeare Quarterly 38. 501–19.Google Scholar
. 2004. ‘Modern Spelling: The Hard Choices.’ In and (eds.). 143–57.
. 1977. ‘STC Latin Books: Evidence for Printing-house Practice.’ The Library (=Transactions of the Bibliographical Society). 5th series (=3rd of Transactions of the Bibliographical Society) 32. 1–27.Google Scholar
. 1979a. ‘“STC Latin Books: Evidence for Printing-house Practice”: A Letter to the Editor.’ The Library (=Transactions of the Bibliographical Society). 6th series (=4th of Transactions of the Bibliographical Society) 1. 171.Google Scholar
. 1979b. ‘STC Latin Books: Further Evidence for Printing-house Practice.’ The Library (=Transactions of the Bibliographical Society). 6th series (=4th of Transactions of the Bibliographical Society) 1. 347–54.
1994. ‘Variants as Epistemological Shifts: A Proposed Methodology for Recovering the Two Texts of Shakespeare'sTroilus and Cressida.’ Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 88. 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1972. ‘“Compositor B” and the Pavier Quartos: Problems of Identification and Their Implications.’ The Library (=Transactions of the Bibliographical Society). 5th series (=3rd of Transactions of the Bibliographical Society) 27. 179–206.Google Scholar
1982. The Texts of King Lear and their Origins. Vol. 1: Nicholas Okes and the First Quarto. 2 vols. New Cambridge Shakespeare Studies and Supplementary Texts. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1997. ‘The Publication of Playbooks.’ In and (eds.). 383–422.
. 1600. Bel-vedére or the Garden of the Muses [Edited By] (A[nthony]? M[unday])?. STC 3189. London. F[elix] K[ingston] for Hugh Astley.
1948. ‘Casting Off Copy by Elizabethan Printers: A Theory.’ Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 42. 281–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1938–9. ‘Notes on Running-titles as Bibliographical Evidence.’ The Library (=Transactions of the Bibliographical Society). 4th series (=2nd of Transactions of the Bibliographical Society) 19. 315–38.Google Scholar
. 1942. ‘The Headline in Early Books.’ English Institute Annual Volume for 1941. 185–205.
. 1947–8. ‘An Examination of the Method of Proof Correction in Lear.’ The Library (=Transactions of the Bibliographical Society). 5th series (=3rd of Transactions of the Bibliographical Society) 2. 20–44.Google Scholar
. 1948. ‘Elizabethan Proofing.’ Joseph Quincy Adams: Memorial Studies. Ed. , and . Washington DC. Folger Shakespeare Library. 571–86.Google Scholar
. 1949–50. ‘Bibliographical Evidence from the Printer's Measure.’ Studies in Bibliography 2. 153–67.Google Scholar
. 1950–1. ‘Some Relations of Bibliography to Editorial Problems.’ Studies in Bibliography 3. 37–62.Google Scholar
. 1952. ‘The Problem of the Variant Forme in a Facsimile Edition.’ The Library (=Transactions of the Bibliographical Society). 5th series (=3rd of Transactions of the Bibliographical Society) 7. 262–72.Google Scholar
. 1955a. ‘McKerrow's Editorial Principles for Shakespeare Reconsidered.’ Shakespeare Quarterly 6. 309–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1955b. On Editing Shakespeare and the Elizabethan Dramatists. Philadelphia. University of Pennsylvania Library.Google Scholar
. 1955c. ‘The Yale Folio Facsimile and Scholarship.’ Modern Philology 53. 50–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1956. ‘The Textual Relation of Q2 to Q1 Hamlet (I).’ Studies in Bibliography 8. 39–66.Google Scholar
. 1959. Textual and Literary Criticism: The Sandars Lectures in Bibliography 1957–58. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1964. Bibliography and Textual Criticism: The Lyell Lectures at Oxford, Trinity Term 1959. Oxford. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
. 1966. On Editing Shakespeare. 2nd edn. Charlottesville. University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
. 1969. ‘Bibliography Revisited.’ The Library (=Transactions of the Bibliographical Society). 5th series (=3rd of Transactions of the Bibliographical Society) 24. 89–128.Google Scholar
. 1973. ‘“McKerrow Revisited”: A Review of Philip Gaskell,A New Introduction to Bibliography (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972).’ Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 67. 109–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1975. ‘Remarks on Eclectic Texts.’ Proof: The Yearbook of American Bibliographical and Textual Studies 4. 31–76.Google Scholar
. 1978. ‘The Copy for Shakespeare's Julius Caesar.’ South Atlantic Bulletin 43.4. 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1992. From Text to Performance in the Elizabethan Theatre. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1979. The New Cambridge Shakespeare: Editorial Guide and Specimen Pages. Unpublished Pamphlet Deposited at the Library of the Shakespeare Institute of the University of Birmingham, Shelfmark ‘P/Box 200’.
. 1640. The Antipodes: A Comedie. STC 3818 BEPD 586a. London. John Okes for France Constable.Google Scholar
. 1955. ‘The Compositors of Hamlet Q2 and The Merchant of Venice.’ Studies in Bibliography 7. 17–40.Google Scholar
. 1960. ‘The Rationale of Old-spelling Editions of the Plays of Shakespeare and His Contemporaries.’ Studies in Bibliography 13. 49–67.Google Scholar
. 2008. ‘Reading Shakespeareans’: Paper Delivered on 4 August at the 33rd International Shakespeare Conference at the Shakespeare Institute, Stratford-upon-Avon, on ‘Close Encounters with the Text of Shakespeare’, 3–8 August.
. 1992. ‘“Masculine Love”, Renaissance Writing, and the “New Invention” of Homosexuality.’ Homosexuality in Renaissance and Enlightenment England: Literary Representations in Historical Context. Ed. . New York. Haworth Press. 9–40.Google Scholar
1957. ‘The Quartos and the Folio Text of Richard III.’ Review of English Studies. n.s. 8. 225–33.
1971. ‘Compositors C and D of the Shakespeare First Folio.’ Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 65. 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1972. ‘Compositors E and F of the Shakespeare First Folio.’ Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 66. 369–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 1956. ‘Roberts’ Compositors in Titus Andronicus Q2.' Studies in Bibliography 8. 27–38.Google Scholar
and . 1957. ‘The Printing of the Second Quarto of Romeo and Juliet (1599).’ Studies in Bibliography 9. 107–28.Google Scholar
. 1966a. ‘“The Degressive Principle”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 3362 (4 August). 716.
. 1966b. ‘“The Degressive Principle”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 3363 (11 August). 732.
1952–3. ‘Compositor Determination in the First Folio King Lear.’ Studies in Bibliography 5. 73–80.Google Scholar
1923c. ‘The First Folio.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 1109 (19 April). 253–4.
1924–5. ‘“The Disintegration of Shakespeare”: The British Academy Annual Shakespeare Lecture Read 12 May 1924.’ Proceedings of the British Academy 11. 89–108.Google Scholar
1930. William Shakespeare: A Study of Facts and Problems. Vol. 1. 2 vols. Oxford. Clarendon Press.
. 1995. ‘“Who is it that Can Tell Me Who I Am?”: The Theory of Authorial Revision between the Quarto and Folio Texts of King Lear.’ The Library (=Transactions of the Bibliographical Society). 6th series (=4th of Transactions of the Bibliographical Society) 17. 34–59.Google Scholar
. 1983. ‘“Is This the Promis'd End?”: Revision in the Role of the King.’ In and (eds.). 121–41.
, (ed.). 1992. The Hamlet First Published (Q1, 1603): Origins, Forms, Intertextualities. Newark. University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
. 1907. Biographia Literaria, and Aesthetical Essays. Ed. . Vol. 2: Biographia Literaria Chapters 14 to 24; Aesthetical Essays. 2 vols. Oxford. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
. 1710a. The Works. Vol. 1: The Old Bachelor; Double Dealer; Love for Love. London. Jacob Tonson.Google Scholar
. 1710b. The Works. Vol. 2: The Mourning Bride; The Way of the World; The Judgment of Paris; Semele. London. Jacob Tonson.Google Scholar
2004. ‘Open Stage, Open Page? Editing Stage Directions in Early Dramatic Texts.’ In and (eds.). 178–93.
and (eds.). 1997. A New History of Early English Drama. Foreword by Stephen J. Greenblatt. New York. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
1971. ‘The Compositors of the Shakespeare Quartos Printed by Peter Short.’ Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 65. 393–7.Google Scholar
1973a. ‘Simmes’ Compositor A and Five Shakespeare Quartos.' Studies in Bibliography 26. 37–60.Google Scholar
1973b. ‘Two Valentine Simmes Compositors.’ Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 67. 161–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1974. ‘Proofreading in the Shop of Valentine Simmes.’ Papers of the Bibliogra-phical Society of America 68. 361–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1918. ‘Verloren gegangene englische Dramen aus dem Zeitalter Shakespeares.’ Shakespeare Jahrbuch 54. 42–9.Google Scholar
. 1992. ‘Shakespeare and Stenography Reconsidered.’ Analytical and Enumerative Bibliography. n.s. 6. 77–100.Google Scholar
. 1996. ‘“Some by Stenography?”: Stationers, Shorthand, and the Early Shakespearean Quartos.’ Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 90. 417–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1999. ‘King Lear in an Age of Stenographical Reproduction or “On Sitting Down to Copy King Lear Again”.’ Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 92. 297–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1977. ‘The CEAA and Modern Textual Editing.’ The Library (=Transactions of the Bibliographical Society). 5th series (=3rd of Transactions of the Bibliographical Society) 32. 61–74.Google Scholar
. 2006. ‘“Now, Gods, Stand Up for Bastards”: The 1603 “Good Quarto” Hamlet.’ Textual Cultures: Texts, Contexts, Interpretations 1.2. 60–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1970. ‘Marry, Sweet Wag.’ The Elizabethan Theatre II: Papers Given at the Second International Conference on Elizabethan Theatre Held at the University of Waterloo, Ontario, in July 1969. Ed. David Galloway. London. Macmillan. 134–43.Google Scholar
. 1977. ‘The Selection and Presentation of Bibliographical Evidence.’ Analytical and Enumerative Bibliography 1. 101–36.Google Scholar
, and . 1607. The Travailes of the Three English Brothers. STC 6417 BEPD 248a(i). London. [George Eld] for John Wright.Google Scholar
. 1988. ‘The Essential Shakespeare and the Material Book.’ Textual Practice 2. 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Shakespeare Verbatim: The Reproduction of Authenticity and the 1790 Apparatus. Oxford. Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1993. ‘What is a Work? What is a Document?’ New Ways of Looking at Old Texts: Papers of the Renaissance English Text Society, 1985–1991. Ed. . Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies 107. Binghamton NY. Center for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies at the State University of New York. 199–207.Google Scholar
. 1995. ‘The Question of the One and the Many: The Globe Shakespeare, The Complete King Lear, and The New Folger Library Shakespeare.’ Shakespeare Quarterly 46. 245–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 1993. ‘The Materiality of Shakespeare's Text.’ Shakespeare Quarterly 44. 255–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (eds.). 2004. Genetic Criticism: Texts and Avant-textes. Philadelphia. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
. 1976. Of Grammatology. Trans. Gayatri Chakrovorty Spivak. Baltimore MD. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
. 2006. ‘The Shakespeare Edition in Industrial Capitalism.’ Shakespeare Survey 59: Editing Shakespeare. 147–56.Google Scholar
. 1994. ‘Is There a Performance in the Text?’ Shakespeare Quarterly 54. 74–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1990. ‘The Design of the Oxford Shakespeare: An Ever Writer to a Never Reader?’ Analytical and Enumerative Bibliography 4. 91–7.Google Scholar
and (eds.). 2001. The Oxford Companion to Shakespeare. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 1985. ‘History and Ideology: The Instance of Henry V.’ Alternative Shakespeares. Ed. . New Accents. London. Methuen. 206–27.Google Scholar
. 1928. Henry VI, Parts II and III: Their Relation to the Contention and the True Tragedy. University of Iowa Humanistic Studies 4.4. Iowa City. University of Iowa.Google Scholar
. 1931. The Text of King Lear. Stanford University Publications University Series: Language and Literature 4.2. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2007. ‘A Question (Not) to be Askt: Is Hand D a Copy?’ The Shakespeare Apocrypha. Ed. . The Shakespeare Yearbook 16. Ceredigion. Edwin Mellen. 241–66.Google Scholar
. 1985. ‘Introduction.’ Alternative Shakespeares. Ed. . New Accents. London. Methuen. 1–25.Google Scholar
. 2007. ‘Afterword.’ Shakespeare and the Text. Ed. . Concise Companions to Literature and Culture. Oxford. Blackwell. 221–38.Google Scholar
. 1941. The ‘Bad’ Quarto of Hamlet: A Critical Study. Shakespeare Problems 6. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1943. ‘The Taming of a Shrew and The Taming of the Shrew.’ Review of English Studies. o.s. 19. 337–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1949. Elizabethan Shorthand and the First Quarto of King Lear. Oxford. Basil Blackwell.
. 1991. Mastering the Revels: The Regulation and Censorship of English Renaissance Drama. London. Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1996. ‘The Birth of the Author.’ In and (eds.). 71–92.
. 1982. ‘Review of Steven Urkowitz, Shakespeare's Revision of “King Lear” (Princeton University Press, 1980) and P. W. K. Stone, The Textual History of “King Lear” (London: Scolar Press, 1980).’ Modern Language Review 77. 694–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Green Shakespeare: From Ecopolitics to Ecocriticism. Accents on Shakespeare. London. Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2008. ‘Foucault's Epistemic Shift and Verbatim Repetition in Shakespeare.’ Shakespeare's Book. Ed. , and . Manchester University Press. 123–39.Google Scholar
. 2002. ‘Shakespeare and the Publication of His Plays.’ Shakespeare Quarterly 53. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (eds.). 2004. Textual Performances: The Modern Reproduction of Shakespeare's Drama. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
and . 2000. ‘Vile Arts: The Marketing of English Printed Drama, 1512–1660.’ Research Opportunities in Renaissance Drama 39. 77–165.Google Scholar
and . 2005a. ‘The Popularity of Playbooks Revisited.’ Shakespeare Quarterly 56. 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 2005b. ‘The Structures of Popularity in the Early Modern Book Trade.’ Shakespeare Quarterly 56. 206–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1959. ‘The Compositors of Henry IV Part 2, Much Ado About Nothing, The Shoemakers’ Holiday, and the First Part of the Contention.' Studies in Bibliography 13. 19–29.Google Scholar
. 1989. ‘Compositor Identification in Romeo Q1 and Troilus.’ Studies in Biblio-graphy 42. 211–18.Google Scholar
1966a. ‘“The Degressive Principle”: Response to John Carter's Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 3362 (4 August). 716.
1966b. ‘“Impressions of Burke”: Review of William B. Todd, A Bibliography of Edmund Burke (London: Hart-Davis, 1964).’ Times Literary Supplement Number 3358 (7 July). 604.
and . 1647. Comedies and Tragedies. Wing B1581. London. For Humphrey Robinson and Humphrey Mosely.Google Scholar
and . 1980 (for 1979). Sir John van Olden Barnavelt. Ed. . Malone Society Reprints. London. Malone Society.Google Scholar
and . 1634. The Two Noble Kinsmen. STC 11075 BEPD 492a. London. Tho[mas] Cotes for John Waterson.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1993. Hamlet Versus Lear: Cultural Politics and Shakespeare's Art. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1969. ‘Qu'est-ce qu-un auteur?’ (‘What is an Author?’). Bulletin de la Societé francaise de philosophie 63.3. 73–104.Google Scholar
. 1970. The Order of Things: An Archeology of the Human Sciences. World of Man: A Library of Theory and Research in the Human Sciences. London. Tavistock.Google Scholar
. 1994. ‘What is an Author?’ Trans. Josue V. Harari. Contemporary Literary Criticism: Literary and Cultural Studies. 3rd edn. Ed. and . New York. Longman. 341–53.Google Scholar
. 2005. Gödel's Theorem: An Incomplete Guide to Its Use and Abuse. Wellesley MA. A. K. Peters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 2002. ‘Four New Shakespeare Quartos?: Viscount Conway's Lost English Plays.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 5166 (5 April). 17–18.
. 1969. ‘“Depth Analysis”: Review of Fredson Bowers (ed.), Studies in Bibliography Volume 22 (1969) and D. F. McKenzie and J. C. Ross (eds.), A Ledger of Charles Ackers (London: Oxford University Press, 1968).’ Times Literary Supplement Number 3508 (22 May). 564.
1994. ‘“Shakespeare's Bad Quarto”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 4759 (17 June). 17.
. 2002. ‘Major/minor, Main Plot/subplot, Middleton/and.’ The Elizabethan Theatre XV: Papers Given at the Fifteenth (1993) and Sixteenth (1997) International Conferences on Elizabethan Theatre Held at the University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario. Ed. , , and . Toronto. P. D. Meany. 21–38.Google Scholar
. 1991. The Modernist Shakespeare: Critical Texts in a Material World. Oxford. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
. 1594. The Historie of Orlando Furioso. STC 12265 BEPD 123a. London. John Danter for Cuthbert Burbie.Google Scholar
1902. ‘Bacon's Biliteral Cipher and Its Applications.’ The Library. n.s. (=2nd series) 3. 51–3.Google Scholar
1903a. ‘The Bibliographical History of the First Folio.’ The Library. n.s. (=2nd series) 4. 258–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1903b. ‘Facts and Fancies in Baconian Theory.’ The Library. n.s. (=2nd series) 4. 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1908a. ‘On Certain False Dates in Shakespearian Quartos [Part I].’ The Library. n.s. (=2nd series) 9. 113–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1908b. ‘On Certain False Dates in Shakespearian Quartos [Parts II and III].’ The Library. n.s. (=2nd series) 9. 381–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1919a. ‘“Bad” Quartos Outside Shakespeare – Alcazar and Orlando.’ The Library. 3rd series 9. 193–222.
1919b. ‘The Hamlet Texts and Recent Work in Shakespearian Bibliography.’ Modern Language Review 14. 380–5.Google Scholar
1922. Two Elizabethan Abridgements: The Battle of Alcazar and Orlando Furioso. Malone Society Reprints. Extra Volume. London. Malone Society.Google Scholar
1925. ‘The Evidence of Theatrical Plots for the History of the Elizabethan Stage.’ Review of English Studies. o.s. 1. 257–74.
1925–6. ‘Prompt Copies, Private Transcripts, and the “Playhouse Scrivener”.’ The Library (=Transactions of the Bibliographical Society). 4th series (=2nd of Transactions of the Bibliographical Society) 6. 148–56.Google Scholar
1928a. ‘Dramatic Publication in England, 1580–1640: A Response to Evelyn May Albright's Reply [to W. W. Greg's Review].’ Review of English Studies. o.s. 4. 202–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1928b. ‘Review of Evelyn May Albright, Dramatic Publication in England, 1580–1640: A Study of Conditions Affecting Content and Form of Drama (London: Oxford University Press, 1927).’ Review of English Studies. o.s. 4. 91–100.
1933. ‘The Function of Bibliography in Literary Criticism Illustrated in a Study of the Text of King Lear.’ Neophilologus 18. 241–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1935. ‘“The Genuine Text”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 1740 (6 June). 364.
1936–7. ‘King Lear – Mislineation and Stenography.’ The Library (=Transactions of the Bibliographical Society). 4th series (=2nd of Transactions of the Bibliographical Society) 17. 172–83.Google Scholar
1940. The Variants in the First Quarto of King Lear: A Bibliographical and Critical Inquiry. Supplements to the Bibliographical Society's Transactions 15. London. The Bibliographical Society.Google Scholar
1941. ‘McKerrow's “Prolegomena” Reconsidered.’ Review of English Studies. o.s. 17. 139–49.
1942. The Editorial Problem in Shakespeare: A Survey of the Foundations of the Text. Oxford. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1952. Jonson's Masque of Gipsies in the Burley, Belvoir, and Windsor Versions: An Attempt at Reconstruction. London. British Academy.Google Scholar
1955. The Shakespeare First Folio: Its Bibliographical and Textual History. Oxford. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
, (ed.). 1907. Henslowe Papers: Being Documents Supplementary to Henslowe's Diary. London. Bullen.Google Scholar
, (ed.). 1911. The Book of Sir Thomas More. Malone Society Reprints. Oxford. Malone Society.Google Scholar
, (ed.). 1931. Dramatic Documents from the Elizabethan Playhouses: Stage Plots, Actors' Parts, Prompt Books. Vol. 1: Commentary. 2 vols. Oxford. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
. 1999. ‘Maximal and Minimal Texts: Shakespeare v. the Globe.’ Shakespeare Survey 52. 68–87.Google Scholar
. 2004. ‘A New Theatre Historicism.’ From Script to Stage in Early Modern England. Ed. and . Redefining British Theatre History. Basingstoke. Palgrave Macmillan. 71–88.Google Scholar
. 1984. ‘Review of Peter W. M. Blayney, The Texts of “King Lear” and Their Origins. Vol. 1: Nicholas Okes and the First Quarto (Cambridge University Press, 1982).’ The Library (=Transactions of the Bibliographical Society). 6th series (=4th of Transactions of the Bibliographical Society) 6. 89–93.Google Scholar
. 1964. Annals of English Drama 975–1700: An Analytical Record of All Plays, Extant or Lost, Chronologically Arranged and Indexed By Authors, Titles, Dramatic Companies, Etc. Rev. S. Schoenbaum. Philadelphia. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
1948. ‘A Note on Coriolanus.’ Joseph Quincy Adams: Memorial Studies. Ed. , and . Washington DC. Folger Shakespeare Library. 239–52.Google Scholar
. 1932a. ‘The Length of Elizabethan and Jacobean Plays.’ Review of English Studies. o.s. 8. 139–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1932b. ‘The Time Allotted for Representation of Elizabethan and Jacobean Plays.’ Review of English Studies. o.s. 8. 395–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1942. Stolne and Surreptitious Copies: A Comparative Study of Shakespeare's Bad Quartos. Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
. 1637. Pleasant Dialogues and Dramma's. STC 13358. London. R[ichard] O[ulton] for R[ichard] H[earne] to be sold by Thomas Slater.
. 1639. If You Know Not Me, You Know no Bodie: Or, the Troubles of Queen Elizabeth. STC 13335 BEPD 215h. London. J[ohn] Raworth for N[athaniel] Butter.Google Scholar
. 1940–1. ‘Principles Governing the Use of Variant Spellings as Evidence of Alternate Setting by Two Compositors.’ The Library (=Transactions of the Bibliographical Society). 4th series (=2nd of Transactions of the Bibliographical Society) 21. 78–94.Google Scholar
1942a. ‘New Uses for Headlines as Bibliographical Evidence.’ English Institute Annual volume for 1941. 207–22.
. 1942b. ‘A Proof-sheet in the First Folio of Shakespeare.’ The Library (=Transactions of the Bibliographical Society). 4th series (=2nd of Transactions of the Bibliographical Society) 23. 101–7.Google Scholar
. 1947. ‘Mechanized Collation: A Preliminary Report.’ Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 41. 99–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
. 1950. ‘Mark III: New Light on the Proof-reading for the First Folio of Shakespeare.’ Studies in Bibliography 3. 145–53.Google Scholar
. 1953. ‘Variant Readings in the First Folio of Shakespeare.’ Shakespeare Quarterly 4. 279–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1953–4. ‘The Proof-reading of the First Folio Text of Romeo and Juliet.’ Studies in Bibliography 6. 61–70.Google Scholar
. 1955. ‘Cast-off Copy for the First Folio of Shakespeare.’ Shakespeare Quarterly 6. 259–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1957. ‘The Prentice Hand in the Tragedies of the Shakespeare First Folio: Compositor E.’ Studies in Bibliography 9. 3–20.Google Scholar
. 1963a. The Printing and Proof-reading of the First Folio of Shakespeare. Vol. 1. 2 vols. Oxford. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
. 1963b. The Printing and Proof-reading of the First Folio of Shakespeare. Vol. 2. 2 vols. Oxford. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
. 1994. ‘“Shakespeare's Bad Quarto”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 4749 (8 April). 17.
. 2003. Textual Shakespeare: Writing and the Word. Hatfield. University of Hertfordshire Press.Google Scholar
and . 1993. ‘Text and Stage: Shakespeare, Bibliography, and Performance Studies.’ New Theatre Quarterly 9. 179–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 1994. ‘“Shakespeare's Bad Quarto”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 4740 (4 February). 15.
, and . 1995. ‘“What's the Matter?”: Shakespeare and Textual Theory.’ Textual Practice 9. 93–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1997. ‘Busy Doing Nothing: A Response to Pechter.’ Textual Practice 11. 81–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 1992. Shakespeare's History Plays: Richard II to Henry V. New Casebooks. Basingstoke. Macmillan.Google Scholar
J. 2001. ‘Harold Jenkins 1909–2000.’ Proceedings of the British Academy 111: [Year] 2000 Lectures and Memoirs. 553–72.Google Scholar
1948. The Bad Quarto of Romeo and Juliet: A Bibliographical and Textual Study. Cornell Studies in English 36. Ithaca NY. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
2003. ‘Material Shakespeare/Materialist Shakespeare.’ Shakespeare Matters: History, Teaching, Performance. Ed. . Newark. University of Delaware Press. 29–45.Google Scholar
1960. ‘Spelling-analysis and Ralph Crane: A Preparatory Study of His Life, Spelling, and Scribal Habits’. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Victoria University of Wellington (New Zealand).
1963. ‘Spelling and the Bibliographer.’ The Library (=Transactions of the Bibliographical Society). 5th series (=3rd of Transactions of the Bibliographical Society) 18. 1–28.Google Scholar
1969. ‘The Oxford Old-spelling Shakespeare Concordances.’ Studies in Bibliography 22. 143–64.Google Scholar
1971. ‘Ralph Crane and Five Shakespeare First Folio Comedies.’ Unpublished D.Phil. thesis, University of Oxford.
1972. Ralph Crane and Some Shakespeare First Folio Comedies. Charlottesville. University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
1973. ‘The Compositors of Shakespeare's Folio Comedies.’ Studies in Bibliography 26. 61–106.Google Scholar
1976. Compositors B and E in the Shakespeare First Folio and Some Recent Studies. Columbia SC. Published privately by the author.Google Scholar
1977. A Reassessment of Compositors B and E in the First Folio Tragedies. Columbia SC. Published privately by the author.Google Scholar
1980. ‘New Light on Compositor E of the Shakespeare First Folio.’ The Library (=Transactions of the Bibliographical Society). 6th series (=4th of Transactions of the Bibliographical Society) 2. 156–78.Google Scholar
1982. ‘The Problem of Manuscript Copy for Folio King Lear.’ The Library (=Transactions of the Bibliographical Society). 6th series (=4th of Transactions of the Bibliographical Society) 4. 1–24.Google Scholar
1985. ‘“The Challenge of King Lear”: Review of Gary Taylor and Michael Warren (eds.), The Division of the Kingdoms: Shakespeare's Two Versions of “King Lear” (Oxford University Press, 1983).’ The Library (=Transactions of the Bibliographical Society). 6th series (=4th of Transactions of the Bibliographical Society) 7. 161–79.
1986. ‘Q1 and the Copy for Folio Lear.’ Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 80. 419–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1988. ‘Crane's 1619 “Promptbook” of Barnavelt and Theatrical Processes.’ Modern Philology 86. 146–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2006. ‘Early Modern Printers and the Standardization of English Spelling.’ Modern Language Review 101. 16–29.Google Scholar
. 1962. ‘The Shares of Fletcher and His Collaborators in the Beaumont and Fletcher Canon ([Part] VII [of VII]).’ Studies in Bibliography 15. 71–90.Google Scholar
. 2006. Dramatists and Their Manuscripts in the Age of Shakespeare, Jonson, Middleton and Heywood: Authorship, Authority and the Playhouse. Routledge Studies in Renaissance Literature and Culture. London. Routledge.Google Scholar
1994. Reforming the ‘Bad’ Quartos: Performance and Provenance of Six Shakespearean First Editions. Newark. University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
1974. ‘Compositor C and the First Folio Text of Much Ado About Nothing.’ Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 68. 414–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1975. ‘Punctuation and the Compositors of Shakespeare's Sonnets, 1609.’ The Library (=Transactions of the Bibliographical Society). 5th series (=3rd of Transactions of the Bibliographical Society) 30. 1–24.Google Scholar
1978. ‘Compositors B, C, and D, and the First Folio Text of Love's Labour's Lost.’ Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 72. 61–5.Google Scholar
1982. ‘Two Shakespeare Quartos: Richard III (1597) and 1 Henry IV (1598).’ Studies in Bibliography 35. 173–90.Google Scholar
1983. ‘Fluctuating Variation: Author, Annotator, or Actor?’ In and (eds.). 313–49.
1987. ‘Compositors’ Stints and the Spacing of Punctuation in the First Quarto (1609) of Pericles.' Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 81. 17–23.Google Scholar
1989. ‘Review of William Shakespeare, The Complete Works, ed. Stanley Wells, Gary Taylor, John Jowett and William Montgomery (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986) and William Shakespeare, The Complete Works: Original Spelling Edition, ed. Stanley Wells, Gary Taylor, John Jowett and William Montgomery (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986) and Stanley Wells, Gary Taylor, John Jowett and William Montgomery, William Shakespeare: A Textual Companion (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987).’ Shakespeare Survey 41. 228–41.Google Scholar
2001a. ‘Finding the Pattern: Peter Short's Shakespeare Quartos Revisited.’ Bibliographical Society of Australia and New Zealand Bulletin 25. 67–86.Google Scholar
2001b. ‘Shakespeare's Richard II and the Anonymous Thomas of Woodstock.’ Medieval and Renaissance Drama in England 14. 17–65.Google Scholar
2006. ‘The Date and Authorship of Hand D's Contribution to Sir Thomas More: Evidence from “Literature Online”.’ Shakespeare Survey 59. 69–78.Google Scholar
. 1994. ‘“Shakespeare's Bad Quarto”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 4750 (15 April). 17.
1946. ‘Press Corrections and Presswork in the Elizabethan Printing Shop.’ Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 40. 276–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1974. ‘Press-variants and Proofreading in the First Quarto of Othello.’ Studies in Bibliography 27. 177–84.Google Scholar
. 1600. The Comicall Satyre of Every Man Out of His Humor. STC 14767 BEPD 163a. London. [Adam Islip] for William Holme.Google Scholar
. 1605. Sejanus His Fall. STC 14782 BEPD 216a. London. George Eld for Thomas Thorpe.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1983. ‘New Created Creatures: Ralph Crane and the Stage Directions in The Tempest.’ Shakespeare Survey 36. 107–20.Google Scholar
. 1984. ‘Ligature Shortage and Speech-prefix Variation in Julius Caesar.’ The Library (=Transactions of the Bibliographical Society). 6th series (=4th of Transactions of the Bibliographical Society) 6. 244–53.Google Scholar
. 1987. ‘The Thieves in 1 Henry IV.’ Review of English Studies. n.s. 38. 325–33.
. 1989. ‘Cuts and Casting: Author and Book-keeper in the Folio Text of 2 Henry IV.’ AUMLA: Journal of the Australasian Universities Language and Literature Association 72. 275–95.Google Scholar
. 1998a. ‘Henry Chettle and the First Quarto of Romeo and Juliet.’ Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 92. 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1998b. ‘Richard III and the Perplexities of Editing.’ TEXT: An Interdisciplinary Annual of Textual Studies (formerly TEXT: Transactions of the Society for Textual Scholarship) 11. 224–45.Google Scholar
. 1999. ‘After Oxford: Recent Developments in Textual Studies.’ Shakespearean International Yearbook 1. 65–86.Google Scholar
. 2000. ‘“Derby”, “Stanley”, and Memorial Reconstruction in Quarto Richard III.’ Notes and Queries 245. 75–9.Google Scholar
. 2004. ‘The Pattern of Collaboration in Timon of Athens.’ Words that Count: Essay on Early-modern Authorship in Honor of MacDonald P. Jackson. Ed. . Newark. University of Delaware Press. 181–205.Google Scholar
and . 1985. ‘Sprinklings of Authority: The Folio Text of Richard II.’ Studies in Bibliography 38. 151–200.Google Scholar
1967. ‘The Influence of Justification on Spelling in Jaggard's Compositor B.’ Studies in Bibliography 20. 235–9.Google Scholar
1968. ‘Compositor B, the Pavier Quartos, and Copy Spellings.’ Studies in Bibliography 21. 131–61.Google Scholar
. 1998. ‘Killed with Hard Opinions: Oldcastle, Falstaff, and the Reformed Text of 1 Henry IV.’ In and (eds.). 211–27.
1998. ‘Speech Prefixes in Some Shakespearean Quartos.’ Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 92. 177–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1974. The Classical Text: Aspects of Editing in the Age of the Printed Book. Sather Classical Lectures 44. Berkeley. University of California Press.Google Scholar
. 1983. ‘Revision, Adaptation, and the Fool in King Lear.’ In and (eds.). 195–243.
. 2000. ‘Text, Performance, and the Editors: Staging Shakespeare's Drama.’ Shakespeare Quarterly 51. 456–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2004. ‘The Staging of Shakespeare's Drama in Print Editions.’ In and (eds.). 158–77.
. 2006. ‘Narratives About Collaborating Playwrights: The New Bibliography, “Disintegration”, and the Problem of Multiple Authorship in Shakespeare’: A Paper for the Seminar ‘Sa(l)vaging the New Bibliography: The New World of Editing’ on 21 July at the 8th World Shakespeare Congress in Brisbane, 16–21 July.
and . 1994. ‘“Shakespeare's Bad Quarto”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 4741 (11 February). 15.
. 1938. ‘A Census of Bad Quartos.’ Review of English Studies. o.s. 14. 20–43.
. 1946. ‘Author's Copyright in England Before 1640.’ Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 40. 43–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2000. ‘Bad Memories of Margaret?: Memorial Reconstruction versus Revision in The First Part of the Contention and 2 Henry VI.’ Shakespeare Quarterly 51. 154–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Quantum: Einstein, Bohr and the Great Debate About the Nature of Reality. London. Icon.Google Scholar
. 1592. The Spanish Tragedie. STC 15086 BEPD 110a. London. Edward Allde for Edward White.
. 1602. The Spanish Tragedie…Newly Corrected, Amended, and Enlarged. STC 15089 BEPD 110d. London. W[illiam] W[hite] for T[homas] Pavier.Google Scholar
1935a. ‘“The Genuine Text”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 1738 (23 May). 313.
1935b. ‘“The Genuine Text”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 1740 (6 June). 364.
. 1935a. ‘“The Genuine Text”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 1735 (2 May). 288.
. 1935b. ‘“The Genuine Text”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 1738 (23 May). 313.
1998. ‘Authentic Reproductions: The Material Origins of the New Bibliography.’ In and (eds.). 23–44.
1985a. ‘“A Bed / for Woodstock”: A Warning for the Unwary.’ Medieval and Renaissance Drama in England 2. 91–118.Google Scholar
1985b. ‘Stage-directions: A Misinterpreted Factor in Determining Textual Provenance.’ TEXT: Transactions of the Society for Textual Scholarship 2. 121–37.Google Scholar
1989. ‘John a Kent and John a Cumber: An Elizabethan Playbook and Its Implications.’ Shakespeare and Dramatic Tradition: Essays in Honor of S. F. Johnson. Ed. and . Newark. University of Delaware Press. 125–43.Google Scholar
. 1982. The Verdict. Motion Picture. Twentieth Century-Fox Film.
1996. Shakespearean Suspect Texts: The ‘Bad’ Quartos and Their Contexts. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (eds.). 1998. Textual Formations and Reformations. Newark: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
. 2003. ‘From Strange's Men to Pembroke's Men: 2 Henry VI and The First Part of the Contention.’ Shakespeare Quarterly 54. 253–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1991. ‘Levelling Shakespeare: Local Customs and Local Texts.’ Shakespeare Quarterly 42. 168–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996. Unediting the Renaissance: Shakespeare, Marlowe, Milton. London. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2004. ‘The Two Texts of Othello and Early Modern Constructions of Race.’ In and (eds.). 21–36.
2007. ‘Editing Shakespeare in the Postmodern Age.’ Shakespeare and the Text. Ed. . Concise Companions to Literature and Culture. Oxford. Blackwell. 128–44.Google Scholar
. 1590. [1 and 2 Tamburlaine] Tamburlaine the Great…Deuided Into Two Tragicall Discourses. STC 17425 BEPD 94a, 95a. London. Richard Jones.Google Scholar
. 1604. The Tragicall History of D[octor] Faustus. STC 17429 BEPD 205a. London. Valentine Simmes for Thomas Bushell.Google Scholar
. 1616. The Tragicall History of the Life and Death of Doctor Faustus. STC 17432 BEPD 205d. London. John Wright.Google Scholar
. 2003. ‘“… and Laertes”: The Case against Tidiness.’ Stage Directions in Hamlet: New Essays and New Directions. Ed. . Madison NJ. Fairleigh Dickinson University Press. 92–8.Google Scholar
. 1997a. ‘Pressing Subjects; Or, the Secret Lives of Shakespeare's Compositors.’ Language Machines: Technologies of Literary and Cultural Production. Ed. , and . Essays from the English Institute. New York. Routledge. 75–107.Google Scholar
. 1997b. Textual Intercourse: Collaboration, Authorship, and Sexualities in Renaissance Drama. Cambridge Studies in Renaissance Literature and Culture 14. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, (ed.). 1985. Textual Criticism and Literary Interpretation. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1959a. ‘Compositor B's Role in The Merchant of Venice Q2 (1619).’ Studies in Bibliography 12. 75–90.Google Scholar
1959b. ‘Shakespearian Punctuation – A New Beginning.’ Review of English Studies. n.s. 10. 361–70.
1969. ‘Printers of the Mind: Some Notes on Bibliographical Theories and Printing-house Practices.’ Studies in Bibliography 22. 1–75.Google Scholar
1981. ‘Typography and Meaning: The Case of William Congreve.’ Buch und Buchhandel in Europa im achtzehnten Jahrhundert: fünftes Wolfenbütteler Symposium vom 1 bis 3 November 1977 [= The Book and the Book Trade in Eighteenth-century Europe: Proceedings of the Fifth Wolfenbütteler Symposium 1–3 November 1977]. Ed. and . Hamburg. Hauswedell. 81–125.Google Scholar
1984. ‘Stretching a Point: Or, the Case of the Spaced-out Comps.’ Studies in Bibliography 37. 106–21.Google Scholar
1986. Bibliography and the Sociology of Texts: The Panizzi Lectures for 1985. London. The British Library.Google Scholar
1921–2. ‘The Use of the Galley in Elizabethan Printing.’ The Library (=Transactions of the Bibliographical Society). 4th series (=2nd of Transactions of the Bibliographical Society) 2. 97–108.Google Scholar
1924–5. ‘Elizabethan Printers and the Composition of Reprints.’ The Library (=Transactions of the Bibliographical Society). 4th series (=2nd of Transactions of the Bibliographical Society) 5. 357–64.Google Scholar
1931–2. ‘The Elizabethan Printer and Dramatic Manuscripts.’ The Library (=Transactions of the Bibliographical Society). 4th series (=2nd of Transactions of the Bibliographical Society) 12. 253–73.Google Scholar
1935. ‘A Suggestion Regarding Shakespeare's Manuscripts.’ Review of English Studies. o.s. 11. 459–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1937. ‘A Note on the “Bad Quartos” of 2 and 3 Henry VI and the Folio Text.’ Review of English Studies. o.s. 13. 64–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1939. Prolegomena for the Oxford Shakespeare: A Study in Editorial Method. Oxford. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
. 1979. ‘Spellbound: Typography and the Concept of Old-spelling Editions.’ Renaissance and Reformation / Renaissance et Réforme 3.1. 50–65.Google Scholar
[as Random Cloud]. 1982a. ‘The Marriage of Good and Bad Quartos.’ Shakespeare Quarterly 33. 421–31.Google Scholar
. 1983. ‘Gon. No More, the Text is Foolish.’ In and (eds.). 153–93.
. 1984. ‘Spellbound.’ Play-texts in Old Spelling: Papers from the Glendon Conference. Ed. and . AMS Studies in the Renaissance. New York. AMS. 81–96.Google Scholar
[as Random Clod]. 1991. ‘Information on Information.’ TEXT: Transactions of the Society for Textual Scholarship 5. 241–81.Google Scholar
. 1970. ‘The Book of Sir Thomas More: A Theatrical View.’ Modern Philology 68. 10–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1972. ‘Casting for Pembroke's Men: The Henry VI Quartos and The Taming of a Shrew.’ Shakespeare Quarterly 23. 141–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1996. ‘“Our Whole Life is Like a Play”: Collaboration and the Problem of Editing.’ Textus: English Studies in Italy 9.2: ‘Shakespeare's Text(s)’ guest-edited by Ann Thompson and Keir Elam. 437–60.
and (eds.). 1992. The Politics of Tragicomedy: Shakespeare and After. London. Routledge.Google Scholar
. 1598. Palladis Tamia: Wits Treasury Being the Second Part of Wits Common Wealth. STC 17834. London. P[eter] Short for Cuthbert Burbie.
. 2005. The Identity of Shakespeare in Henry VIII. Renaissance Monographs 32. Tokyo. The Renaissance Institute of Sophia University.Google Scholar
. 1985. ‘Disputed Shakespearean Texts and Stylometric Analysis.’ TEXT: Transactions of the Society for Textual Scholarship 2. 149–71.Google Scholar
1994. ‘Shakespeare's Art and the Texts of King Lear.’ Studies in Bibliography 47. 128–46.Google Scholar
. 1909. The Second Maiden's Tragedy, 1611. Ed. . Malone Society Reprints. Oxford. Malone Society.Google Scholar
. 2007. Thomas Middleton: The Collected Works. Gen. ed. and . Oxford. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
. 1985. ‘The Contention of York and Lancaster: A Critical Edition.’ Unpublished D.Phil. thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
. 1933. The Launching of the Mary, or The Seaman's Honest Wife. Ed. . Malone Society Reprints. Oxford. Malone Society.Google Scholar
1998. ‘The Problem of Shakespeare's Text(s).’ In and (eds.). 131–48.
. 1683. Mechanick Exercises, Or, The Doctrine of Handy-works. Wing M3014. Vol. 2: Applied to the Art of Printing. 2 vols. London. Joseph Moxon.Google Scholar
. 2005. Children of the Queen's Revels: A Jacobean Theatre Repertory. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1999. ‘“Came Errour Here By Mysse of Man”: Editing and the Metaphysics of Presence.’ Yearbook of English Studies 29. 118–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Shakespeare in Print: A History and Chronology of Shakespeare Publishing. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1904. The Works. Ed. Ronald B. McKerrow. Vol. 1: Note on the Treatment of the Text; The Anatomie of Absurditie; A Countercuffe Giuen to Martin Iunior; The Returne of Pasquill; The First Parte of Pasquils Apologie; Pierce Penilesse His Supplication to the Diuell; Strange News, or the Intercepting Certaine Letters; The Terrors of the Night. 5 vols. London. A. H. Bullen.
. 1957. ‘Compositor Haste in the First Folio.’ Shakespeare Quarterly 8. 134–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1975. ‘Compositors D and F of the Shakespeare First Folio.’ Studies in Bibliography 28. 81–117.Google Scholar
1977. ‘A Qualitative Analysis of Compositors C and D in the Shakespeare First Folio.’ Studies in Bibliography 30. 57–74.Google Scholar
. 1981. ‘What is a Text?’ Research Opportunities in Renaissance Drama 24. 3–6.
. 1994. ‘Acting Scripts, Performing Texts.’ Crisis in Editing: Texts of the English Renaissance: Papers Given at the Twenty-fourth Annual Conference on Editorial Problems, University of Toronto, 4–5 November 1988. Ed. Randall McLeod. New York. AMS Press. 251–94.
. 1996. ‘Forum on Editing Early Modern Texts: What is an Editor?’ Shakespeare Studies 14. 23–9, 75–8.Google Scholar
and (eds.). 1996. Elizabethan Theater: Essays in Honor of S. Schoenbaum. Newark. University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
. 1936. The Textual History of Richard III. Stanford University Publications University Series: Language and Literature 6.1. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1997. ‘Making Love to Our Employment; Or, the Immateriality of Arguments About the Materiality of Shakespearean Text.’ Textual Practice 11. 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2001. ‘Romanticism Lost: Bloom and the Twilight of Literary Shakespeare.’ Harold Bloom's Shakespeare. Ed. and . New York. Palgrave. 145–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Shakespeare Studies Today: Romanticism Lost. New York. Palgrave, 2010.
. 1594. The Battell of Alcazar. STC 19531 BEPD 127a. London. Edward Allde for Richard Bankworth.Google Scholar
1990. ‘“This is Not the Man”: On Calling Falstaff Falstaff.’ Analytical and Enumerative Bibliography 4. 59–71.Google Scholar
. 2001. ‘The Living Text: The Play, the Players, and Folk Tradition.’ Porci Ante Margaritam: Essays in Honour of Meg Twycross. Ed. , and . Leeds Studies in English n.s. 32. Leeds. School of English, University of Leeds. 413–29.Google Scholar
1909. Shakespeare Folios and Quartos: A Study in the Bibliography of Shakespeare's Plays. London. Methuen.Google Scholar
1916a. ‘Authors, Players, and Pirates in Shakespeare's Day.’ The Library. 3rd series 7. 73–101.
1916b. ‘The Improvers of Shakespeare.’ The Library. 3rd series 7. 265–90.
1916c. ‘The Manuscripts of Shakespeare's Plays.’ The Library. 3rd series 7. 198–226.
1916d. ‘The Regulation of the Book Trade in the Sixteenth Century.’ The Library. 3rd series 7. 18–43.
1917. Shakespeare's Fight with the Pirates and the Problems of the Transmission of His Text. London. Moring.Google Scholar
1919a. ‘Shakespeare's Hand in the Play of “Sir Thomas More”.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 901 (24 April). 222.
1919b. ‘Shakespeare's Hand in the Play of “Sir Thomas More”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 905 (22 May). 279.
1923–4. ‘Elizabethan Spelling as a Literary and Bibliographical Clue.’ The Library (=Transactions of the Bibliographical Society). 4th series (=2nd of Transactions of the Bibliographical Society) 4. 1–8.Google Scholar
and . 1919a. ‘The “Stolne and Surreptitious” Shakespearian Texts, Part One: Why Some of Shakespeare's Plays Were Pirated.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 886 (9 January). 18.
and . 1919b. ‘The “Stolne and Surreptitious” Shakespearian Texts, Part Two: How Some of Shakespeare's Plays Were Pirated.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 887 (16 January). 30.
and . 1919c. ‘The “Stolne and Surreptitious” Shakespearian Texts, Henry V (1600).’ Times Literary Supplement Number 895 (13 March). 134.
and . 1919d. ‘The “Stolne and Surreptitious” Shakespearian Texts, Merry Wives of Windsor (1602).’ Times Literary Supplement Number 916 (7 August). 420.
and . 1919e. ‘The “Stolne and Surreptitious” Shakespearian Texts: Romeo and Juliet, 1597.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 917 (14 August). 434.
and . 1920. ‘What Follows if Some of the Good Quarto Editions of Shakespeare's Plays were Printed from his Autograph Manuscripts: Summary.’ Transactions of the Bibliographical Society. 2nd series 15. 136–9.
, , , and . 1923. Shakespeare's Hand in the Play of Sir Thomas More. Shakespeare Problems 2. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1994. ‘“Materialism”, Dialectics, and Editing Shakespeare.’ New Theatre Quarterly 10. 263–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2003. ‘Editing Desdemona.’ In Arden: Editing Shakespeare: Essays in Honour of Richard Proudfoot. Ed. and . The Arden Shakespeare. London. Thomson Learning. 81–94.Google Scholar
. 1955. ‘Variant Formes in Elizabethan Printing.’ The Library (=Transactions of the Bibliographical Society). 5th series (=3rd of Transactions of the Bibliographical Society) 10. 41–8.Google Scholar
. 1960. ‘The Optical Identification of First Formes.’ Studies in Bibliography 13. 189–90.Google Scholar
1978. ‘The Printing of Love's Labour's Lost (1598).’ Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 72. 405–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1920. The Text of Henry V. Newcastle-under-Lyme. Mandley and Unett.
. 2001. ‘The Oxford Shakespeare Re-visited: An Interview with Professor Stanley Wells.’ Analytical and Enumerative Bibliography 12. 73–101.Google Scholar
. 1991. ‘Setting Down What the Clown Spoke: Improvisation, Hand B, and The Book of Sir Thomas More.’ The Library (=Transactions of the Bibliographical Society). 6th series (=4th of Transactions of the Bibliographical Society) 13. 126–36.Google Scholar
. 1997. ‘The Revision of Scripts.’ In and (eds.). 441–60.
1985. ‘B and “J”: Two Compositors in Two Plays of the Shakespeare First Folio.’ The Library (=Transactions of the Bibliographical Society). 6th series (=4th of Transactions of the Bibliographical Society) 7. 126–36.Google Scholar
1977. ‘The Concurrent Printing of Shirley's The Wittie Faire One and The Bird in a Cage.’ Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 71. 328–33.Google Scholar
1935. ‘“The Genuine Text”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 1739 (30 May). 348.
. 1986. What is Literature? Trans. Bernard Frechtman. Introd. David Caute. London. Methuen.Google Scholar
. 1920. ‘“The Spelling of the First Folio”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 959 (3 June). 352.
1916. Cours de Linguistique Générale (Course in General Linguistics). Ed. , and . Paris. Payot.Google Scholar
. 1970. ‘The Orthography of Proper Names in Modern-spelling Editions of Shakespeare.’ Studies in Bibliography 23. 1–19.Google Scholar
1947. ‘Problems in the Editing of Shakespeare: Text.’ English Institute Essays. 97–116.
. 1594. [The Contention of York and Lancaster] The First Part of the Contention Betwixt the Two Famous Houses of Yorke and Lancaster. STC 26099 BEPD 119a (Q1). London. Thomas Creede for Thomas Millington.Google Scholar
. 1595. [Richard Duke of York] The True Tragedie of Richard Duke of Yorke, and the Death of Good King Henrie the Sixt. STC 21006 BEPD 138a (O). London. P[eter] S[hort] for Thomas Millington.Google Scholar
. 1597a. [Richard 2] The Tragedie of King Richard the Second. STC 22307 BEPD 141a (Q1). London. Valentine Simmes for Andrew Wise.Google Scholar
. 1597b. [Romeo and Juliet] An Excellent Conceited Tragedie of Romeo and Juliet. STC 22322 BEPD 143a (Q1). London. [Edward Allde and John Danter] for John Danter.Google Scholar
. 1598a. [1 Henry 4] The Historie of Henrie the Fourth. STC 22279a BEPD 145a (Q1). London. [Peter Short for Andrew Wise].Google Scholar
. 1598b. [1 Henry 4] The Historie of Henrie the Fourth. STC 22280 BEPD 145b (Q2). London. P[eter] S[hort] for Andrew Wise.Google Scholar
. 1599. [Romeo and Juliet] The Most Excellent and Lamentable Tragedie, of Romeo and Juliet. STC 22323 BEPD 143b (Q2). London. Thomas Creede for Cuthbert Burby.Google Scholar
. 1600a. [2 Henry 4] The Second Part of Henrie the Fourth. STC 22288 BEPD 167a(i) (Q). London. V[alentine] S[immes] for Andrew Wise and William Aspley.Google Scholar
. 1600b. [Henry 5] The Cronicle History of Henry the Fift. STC 22289 BEPD 165a (Q1). London. Thomas Creede for Thomas Millington and John Busby.Google Scholar
. 1600c. [Much Ado About Nothing] Much Adoe About Nothing. STC 22304 BEPD 168a (Q). London. V[alentine] S[immes] for Andrew Wise and William Aspley.Google Scholar
. 1603. [Hamlet] The Tragicall Historie of Hamlet Prince of Denmarke. STC 22275 BEPD 197a (Q1). London. [Valentine Simmes] for N[icholas] L[ing] and John Trundell.Google Scholar
. 1604–5. [Hamlet] The Tragicall Historie of Hamlet, Prince of Denmarke. STC 22276 BEPD 197b (Q2). London. J[ames] R[oberts] for N[icholas] L[ing].Google Scholar
. 1608. [King Lear] [The] True Chronicle Historie of the Life and Death of King Lear and His Three Daughters. STC 22292 BEPD 265a (Q1). London. [Nicholas Okes] for Nathaniel Butter.Google Scholar
. 1609. [Troilus and Cressida] The Historie of Troylus and Cresseida. STC 22331 BEPD 279a(i) (Qa). London. G[eorge] Eld for R[ichard] Bonian and H[enry] Walley.Google Scholar
. 1619. [King Lear] [The] True Chronicle Historie of the Life and Death of King Lear and His Three Daughters. STC 22293 BEPD 265b (Q2). London. [William Jaggard] for Nathaniel Butter.Google Scholar
. 1622. [Othello] The Tragoedy of Othello, the Moore of Venice. STC 22305 BEPD 379a (Q1). London. N[icholas] O[kes] for Thomas Walkley.Google Scholar
. 1623. Comedies, Histories & Tragedies. STC 22273 (F1). London. Isaac and William Jaggard for Edward Blount, John Smethwick, Isaac Jaggard and William Aspley.Google Scholar
. 1765. The Plays. Ed. . Vol. 1: Preliminary Matter; The Tempest; A Midsummer-Night's Dream; The Two Gentlemen of Verona; Measure for Measure; The Merchant of Venice. 8 vols. London. J. and R. Tonson [etc.].Google Scholar
. 1821. The Plays and Poems. Ed. and . Vol. 18: Henry VI Part I; Henry VI Part II; Henry VI Part III; Mr Malone's Dissertation. 21 vols. London. F. C. and Rivington [etc.].Google Scholar
. 1863. The Works. Ed. and . Vol. 1: The Tempest; The Two Gentlemen of Verona; The Merry Wives of Windsor; Measure for Measure; The Comedy of Errors. 9 vols. Cambridge. Macmillan.Google Scholar
. 1866. The Works. Ed. , and . Vol. 8: Hamlet; King Lear; Othello. 9 vols. Cambridge. Macmillan.Google Scholar
. 1877. King Henry V: Parallel Texts of the First Quarto (1600) and First Folio (1623) Editions. Ed. . Introd. P. A. Daniel. New Shakspere Society Publications Series 2: Plays 9. London. Trübner.Google Scholar
. 1881. The Merry Wives of Windsor, 1602: A Photo-facsimile. Introd. P. A. Daniel. London. Griggs.Google Scholar
. 1902a. Comedies, Histories, and Tragedies: A Reproduction in Facsimile of the First Folio Edition 1623 from the Chatsworth Copy. Introd. Sidney Lee. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1903b. The Life of King Henry the Fifth. Ed. . The Arden Shakespeare. London. Methuen.Google Scholar
. 1904b. Love's Labour's Lost. Ed. Furness. New Variorum 14. Philadelphia. Lippincott.Google Scholar
. 1909. The First Part of King Henry the Sixth. Ed. . The Arden Shakespeare. London. Methuen.Google Scholar
. 1921a. The Merry Wives of Windsor. Ed. and . The New Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1921c. The Two Gentlemen of Verona. Ed. and . The New Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1922b. Measure for Measure. Ed. and . The New Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1923a. Love's Labour's Lost. Ed. and . The New Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1923b. The Second Part of King Henry the Fourth. Ed. . The Arden Shakespeare. London. Methuen.Google Scholar
. 1924a. A Midsummer Night's Dream. Ed. and . The New Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1928. Coriolanus: A Facsimile of the First Folio Text. Introd. John Dover Wilson. Facsimiles of the First Folio Texts. London. Faber and Gwyer.Google Scholar
. 1930. The First Part of King Henry the Sixth. Ed. . 2nd edn revised by R. H. Case. The Arden Shakespeare. London. Methuen.Google Scholar
. 1950. Measure for Measure. Ed. . 2nd edn. The New Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1952b. The Third Part of King Henry VI. Ed. . The New Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1954b. Comedies, Histories, and Tragedies: A Facsimile Edition. Ed. . Introd. Charles Tyler Prouty. New York. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
. 1957b. The Second Part of King Henry VI. Ed. . The Arden Shakespeare. London. Methuen.Google Scholar
. 1960b. The First Part of King Henry IV. Ed. . The Arden Shakespeare. London. Methuen.Google Scholar
. 1964. The Third Part of King Henry VI. Ed. . The Arden Shakespeare. London. Methuen.Google Scholar
. 1966. Richard II, 1597. Ed. . Shakespeare Quarto Facsimiles 13. Oxford. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
. 1968b. The Norton Facsimile of the First Folio of Shakespeare. Ed. . New York. Norton.Google Scholar
. 1969a. The Complete Pelican Shakespeare: The Comedies and Romances. Gen. ed. . 3 vols. Harmondsworth. Penguin.Google Scholar
. 1969b. The Complete Pelican Shakespeare: The Histories and the Non-Dramatic Poetry. Gen. ed. . 3 vols. Harmondsworth. Penguin.Google Scholar
. 1969c. The Complete Pelican Shakespeare: The Tragedies. Gen. ed. . 3 vols. Harmondsworth. Penguin.Google Scholar
. 1969d. The Complete Works. Gen. ed. . The Pelican Shakespeare. Baltimore MD. Penguin.Google Scholar
. 1973. The Complete Works. Ed. Hardin Craig and David Bevington. Rev. edn. Glenview IL. Scott, Foresman.
. 1982d. Troilus and Cressida. Ed. . The Oxford Shakespeare. Oxford. Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1984a. A Midsummer Night's Dream. Ed. . The New Cambridge Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1986. William Shakespeare: The Complete Works: Original Spelling Edition. Ed. , , and . Oxford. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
. 1989a. The Complete King Lear, 1608–1623: Texts and Parallel Texts in Photographic Facsimile. Ed. . Berkeley. University of California Press.Google Scholar
. 1989b. The Complete Works. Ed. , , and . Electronic edition prepared by William Montgomery and Lou Burnard. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1989c. The Parallel King Lear 1608–1623. Ed. . Berkeley. University of California Press.Google Scholar
. 1990a. The First Part of King Henry VI. Ed. . The New Cambridge Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1991. Measure for Measure. Ed. . The New Cambridge Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1992a. The Complete Works. Ed. David Bevington. 4th edn. New York. HarperCollins.
. 1992b. The Tragedy of Hamlet. Ed. and . The New Folger Library Shakespeare. New York. Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
. 1992c. The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet. Ed. and . The New Folger Library Shakespeare. New York. Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
. 1993a. The Cronicle History of Henry the Fift. Ed. and . Shakespearean Originals: First Editions. Hemel Hempstead. Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
. 1993b. King Lear. Ed. and . The New Folger Library Shakespeare. New York. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
. 1993c. King Lear: A Parallel Text Edition. Ed. . Longman Annotated Texts. London. Longman.Google Scholar
. 1994. A Midsummer Night's Dream. Ed. . The Oxford Shakespeare. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1995d. The Tragedie of Anthonie, and Cleopatra. Ed. . Shakespearean Originals: First Editions. Hemel Hempstead. Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
. 1996a. A Midsommer Night's Dreame. Ed. . Shakespearean Originals: First Editions. Hemel Hempstead. Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
. 1996b. The Norton Facsimile of the First Folio of Shakespeare. Ed. . 2nd edn with a new introduction by Peter W. M. Blayney. New York. Norton.Google Scholar
. 1998. Pericles, Prince of Tyre. Ed. Doreen DelVecchio and Antony Hammond. The New Cambridge Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press.
. 1999a. King Henry VIII or All is True. Ed. . The Oxford Shakespeare. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1999b. King Richard III. Ed. . The New Cambridge Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2000a. The First Quarto of King Henry V. Ed. . The New Cambridge Shakespeare: The Early Quartos. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2000b. King Henry the Eighth. Ed. . The Arden Shakespeare. London. Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
. 2001a. King Henry VI Part 3. Ed. and . The Arden Shakespeare. London. Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
. 2004b. Pericles, Prince of Tyre. Ed. . The Oxford Shakespeare. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2005b. William Shakespeare: The Complete Works. Ed. , , and . 2nd edn. Oxford. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
. 2006c. Hamlet: The Texts of 1603 and 1623. Ed. and . The Arden Shakespeare. London. Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
. 2006d. Much Ado About Nothing. Ed. . The Arden Shakespeare. London. Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
. 2009. King Richard III. Ed. . Updated edn. The New Cambridge Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 1609. [Pericles] The Late, and Much Admired Play Called Pericles, Prince of Tyre. STC 22334 BEPD 284a (Q1). London. [William White and Thomas Creede] for Henry Gosson.Google Scholar
1978. ‘“Accidentals or Incidentals”?: A Letter to the Editor.’ The Library (=Transactions of the Bibliographical Society). 5th series (=3rd of Transactions of the Bibliographical Society) 33. 335.Google Scholar
. 1607. The Fleire. STC 22384 BEPD 255a. London. [Edward Allde for] F[rancis] B[urton].Google Scholar
. 1633a. The Bird in a Cage. STC 22436 BEPD 479a. London. Bernard Alsop and Thomas Fawcett for William Cooke.Google Scholar
. 1633b. The Wittie Fair One. STC 22462 BEPD 477a. London. Bernard Alsop and Thomas Fawcett for William Cooke.Google Scholar
. 1919. ‘“The First Quarto of Hamlet”: Review of John Dover Wilson’ The Copy for “Hamlet”, 1603, and the “Hamlet” Transcript, 1593 ([London: Alexander] Moring[, 1918]).' Times Literary Supplement Number 912 (10 July). 374.
1942. ‘Shakespeare Quartos as Prompt-copies.’ Review of English Studies. o.s. 18. 129–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1996. ‘Is there a Shakespeare after the New New Bibliography?’ In Parker and Zitner (eds.). 169–83.
. 1928. Shakespeare: Truth and Tradition. With a memoir by W. Macneile Dixon. London. Edward Arnold.
. 1963. ‘The Composition of the Quarto of Much Ado About Nothing.’ Studies in Bibliography 16. 9–26.Google Scholar
. 1964. ‘The Cancel in the Quarto of 2 Henry IV Revisited.’ Shakespeare Quarterly 15.3. 173–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 1998. Intellectual Impostures: Postmodern Philosophers' Abuse of Science. London. Profile.Google Scholar
. 1965–80. A Complete and Systematic Concordance to the Works of Shakespeare. 9 vols. Hildesheim. Georg Olms Verlag.Google Scholar
1977. ‘The Compositor and Presswork of Henry V, Q1.’ The Library (=Transactions of the Bibliographical Society). 5th series (=3rd of Transactions of the Bibliographical Society) 32. 37–44.Google Scholar
. 1994a. ‘“Shakespeare's Bad Quarto”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 4738 (21 January). 15.
. 1994b. ‘“Shakespeare's Bad Quarto”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 4748 (1 April). 19.
. 1998. ‘Marx's Coat.’ Border Fetishisms: Material Objects in Unstable Spaces. Ed. . Zones of Religion. New York. Routledge. 183–207.Google Scholar
. 1919. ‘Shakespeare's Hand in the Play of “Sir Thomas More”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 906 (29 May). 295.
. 2004. Making Shakespeare: From Stage to Page. Accents on Shakespeare. London. Routledge.Google Scholar
1919. ‘Shakespeare's Hand in the Play of “Sir Thomas More”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 906 (29 May). 295–6.
. 1987. Textual Criticism Since Greg: A Chronicle, 1950–1985. Charlottesville. University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
. 1989. A Rationale of Textual Criticism. Philadelphia. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
. 1981a. ‘Copy-text and Collation (with Special Reference to Richard III).’ The Library (=Transactions of the Bibliographical Society). 6th series (=4th of Transactions of the Bibliographical Society) 3. 33–42.Google Scholar
. 1981b. ‘The Shrinking Compositor A of the Shakespeare First Folio.’ Studies in Bibliography 34. 96–117.Google Scholar
. 1982b. ‘Troilus and Cressida: Bibliography, Performance, and Interpretation.’ Shakespeare Studies 15. 99–136.Google Scholar
. 1983a. ‘The Folio Copy for Hamlet, King Lear, and Othello.’ Shakespeare Quarterly 34. 44–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1983b. ‘King Lear The Date and Authorship of the Folio Version.’ In and (eds.). 351–468.
. 1983c. ‘Monopolies, Show Trials, Disaster, and Invasion: King Lear and Censorship.’ In and (eds.). 75–119.
. 1985a. ‘Folio Compositors and Folio Copy: King Lear and its Context.’ Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 79. 17–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1985–6. ‘Some Manuscripts of Shakespeare's Sonnets.’ Bulletin of the John Rylands Library 6. 210–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1986a. ‘Inventing Shakespeare.’ Deutsche Shakespeare-Gesellschaft West Jahrbuch. 26–44.
. 1986b. ‘The Transmission of Pericles.’ Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 80. 193–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1993a. ‘Post-script.’ Shakespeare Reshaped, 1606–1623. Ed. and . Oxford Shakespeare Studies. Oxford. Clarendon Press. 237–43.Google Scholar
. 1993b. ‘The Renaissance and the End of Editing.’ Palimpsest: Editorial Theory in the Humanities. Ed. and . Editorial Theory and Literary Criticism 1. Ann Arbor. University of Michigan Press. 121–49.Google Scholar
. 1993c. ‘The Structure of Performance: Act-Intervals in the London Theatres, 1576–1642.’ Shakespeare Reshaped, 1606–1623. Ed. and . Oxford Shakespeare Studies. Oxford. Clarendon Press. 3–50.Google Scholar
. 2004a. ‘Shakespeare's Midlife Crisis.’ The Guardian (newspaper) 3 May. 11.
. 2004b. ‘Thomas Middleton, The Spanish Gypsy, and Collaborative Authorship.’ Words That Count: Essay on Early-modern Authorship in Honor of MacDonald P. Jackson. Ed. . Newark. University of Delaware Press. 241–73.Google Scholar
and . 1983a. ‘Preface.’ In and (eds.). v–x.
and (eds.). 2007. Thomas Middleton and Early Modern Textual Culture: A Companion to the Collected Works. Oxford. Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (eds.). 1983b. The Division of the Kingdoms: Shakespeare's Two Versions of King Lear. Oxford Shakespeare Studies. Oxford. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1966. ‘“The Degressive Principle”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 3366 (1 September). 781.
. 2002. ‘A Comparison of the Suspect Texts of Lope de Vega's La Dama Boba and Shakespeare's Hamlet.’ Shakespeare Yearbook 13: Shakespeare and Spain. 30–57.Google Scholar
. 2004. ‘Playtext Reporters and Memoriones: Suspect Texts in Shakespeare and Spanish Golden Age Drama.’ Shakespeare and the Mediterranean: The Selected Proceedings of the International Shakespeare Association World Congress at Valencia 2001. Ed. , and . Newark. University of Delaware Press. 270–85.Google Scholar
. 1986. ‘Issues: A Trip Through the Divided Kingdoms.’ Shakespeare Quarterly 37. 218–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1990. ‘A Second Look at Critical Bibliography and the Acting of Plays.’ Shakespeare Quarterly 41. 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, 1962. ‘Printing Methods and Textual Problems in A Midsummer Night's Dream Q1.’ Studies in Bibliography 15. 33–55.Google Scholar
, 1966. ‘Reappearing Types as Bibliographical Evidence.’ Studies in Bibliography 19. 198–209.Google Scholar
. 1986a. ‘Reconsidering the Relationship of Quarto and Folio Texts of Richard III.’ English Literary Renaissance 16. 442–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1986b. ‘“Well-sayd Olde Mole”: Burying Three Hamlets in Modern Editions.’ Shakespeare Study Today: The Horace Howard Furness Memorial Lectures. Ed. . AMS Studies in the Renaissance 13. New York. AMS Press. 37–70.Google Scholar
. 1988a. ‘Five Women Eleven Ways: Changing Images of Shakespearean Characters in the Earliest Texts.’ Images of Shakespeare: Proceedings of the Third Congress of the International Shakespeare Association in Berlin, 1–6 April 1986. Ed. , and . Newark. University of Delaware Press. 292–304.Google Scholar
. 1988b. ‘“If I Mistake in those Foundations which I Build Upon”: Peter Alexander's Textual Analysis of Henry VI Parts 2 and 3.’ English Literary Renaissance 18. 230–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1995. ‘“Brother, Can You Spare a Paradigm?”: Textual Generosity and the Printing of Shakespeare's Multiple-text Plays by Contemporary Editors.’ Critical Survey 7. 292–8.Google Scholar
. 1996. ‘Two Versions of Romeo and Juliet 2.6 and Merry Wives of Windsor 5.5.215–45: An Invitation to the Pleasures of Textual/sexual Di(per)versity.’ In and (eds.). 222–38.
. 1998. ‘Preposterous Poststructuralism: Editorial Morality and the Ethics of Evidence.’ New Ways of Looking at Old Texts II: Papers of the Renaissance English Text Society, 1992–1996. Ed. . Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies 188. Temple. Arizona State University. 83–90.Google Scholar
. 1641. Epigrams: Divine and Moral. Wing U135. London. Barnard Alsop and Thomas Fawcett.Google Scholar
. 1993. ‘“Hamlet by Dogberry”: Review of Graham Holderness and Bryan Loughrey (eds.), The Tragicall Historie of Hamlet Prince of Denmark, The Shakespearean Originals: First Editions (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1993).’ Times Literary Supplement Number 4734 (24 December). 5–6.
. 1994a. ‘“Shakespeare's Bad Quarto”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 4740 (4 February). 15.
. 1994b. ‘“Shakespeare's Bad Quarto”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 4744 (4 March). 15.
. 1994c. ‘“Shakespeare's Bad Quarto”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 4752 (29 April). 19.
. 1994d. ‘“Shakespeare's Bad Quarto”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 4765 (29 July). 15.
. 2002. Shakespeare, Co-Author: A Historical Study of Five Collaborative Plays. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1951. ‘The Textual Problem of Hamlet: A Reconsideration.’ Review of English Studies. n.s. 2. 328–38.
. 1953. Textual Problems of the First Folio: Richard III, King Lear, Troilus and Cressida, 2 Henry IV, Hamlet, Othello. Shakespeare Problems 7. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1955a. ‘Collateral Substantive Texts (with Special Reference to Hamlet).’ Studies in Bibliography 7. 51–67.Google Scholar
. 1955b. ‘Compositor Determination and Other Problems in Shakespearian Texts.’ Studies in Bibliography 7. 3–15.Google Scholar
. 1956. ‘Some Editorial Principles (with Special Reference to Henry V).’ Studies in Bibliography 8. 95–111.Google Scholar
1959. ‘The Quarto Copy for Folio Richard III; and Dr Cairncross's Answer.’ Review of English Studies. n.s. 10. 127–40.
. 1978. ‘Quarto and Folio King Lear and the Interpretation of Albany and Edgar.’ Shakespeare, Pattern of Excelling Nature: Shakespeare Criticism in Honor of America's Bicentennial from the International Shakespeare Association Congress, Washington DC, April 1976. Ed. and . Newark. University of Delaware Press. 95–107.Google Scholar
. 1983. ‘The Folio Omission of the Mock Trial: Motives and Consequences.’ In and (eds.). 44–57.
. 2000. ‘The Quarto and Folio Texts of 2 Henry VI: A Reconsideration.’ Review of English Studies. n.s. 51. 193–207.
. 1623. The Tragedy of the Duchesse of Malfy. STC 25176 BEPD 389a. London. Nicholas Okes for John Waterson.Google Scholar
. 2006. Acting from Shakespeare's First Folio: Theory, Text, and Performance. London. Routledge.Google Scholar
. 1980. ‘Editorial Treatment of Foul-paper Texts: Much Ado About Nothing as Test Case.’ Review of English Studies. n.s. 31. 1–16.
. 1982. ‘The Copy for the Folio Text of Love's Labour's Lost.’ Review of English Studies. n.s. 33. 137–47.
. 1984. Re-editing Shakespeare for the Modern Reader. Oxford. Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1991a. The Oxford Shakespeare Editorial Procedures. Unpublished typescript deposited at the library of the Shakespeare Institute of the University of Birmingham, Shelfmark ‘r q PR 2754.W3’.
. 1991b. ‘Theatricalizing Shakespeare's Text.’ New Theatre Quarterly 7. 184–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2006. ‘On Being a General Editor.’ Shakespeare Survey 59: Editing Shakespeare. 39–48.Google Scholar
. 2009. ‘Charles Jasper Sisson’: private correspondence to the author, 7 September.
and . 1979. Modernizing Shakespeare's Spelling, with Three Studies in the Text of Henry V. Oxford. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
and . 1990. ‘The Oxford Shakespeare Re-viewed.’ Analytical and Enumerative Bibliography. n.s. 4. 6–20.
, , and . 1987. William Shakespeare: A Textual Companion. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . [1965]. Editorial Procedures for the New Penguin Shakespeare. Undated, unpublished and currently uncatalogued typescript deposited at the library of the Shakespeare Institute of the University of Birmingham, with its date inferred from surrounding dated drafts and commentaries.
. 1978a. ‘Compositor B of the Shakespeare First Folio.’ Analytical and Enumerative Bibliography 2. 241–63.Google Scholar
. 1978b. ‘Editorial Uses of Compositor Study.’ Analytical and Enumerative Bibliography 2. 153–65.Google Scholar
. 1982. ‘Cases and Compositors in the Shakespeare First Folio Comedies.’ Studies in Bibliography 35. 206–34.Google Scholar
. 1983. ‘Folio Editors, Folio Compositors, and the Folio Text of King Lear.’ In and (eds.). 247–312.
. 1984. ‘Line Division in Shakespeare's Dramatic Verse: An Editorial Problem.’ Analytical and Enumerative Bibliography 8. 73–125.Google Scholar
. 1985a. ‘“An Important but Imperfect Study of the Lear Texts”: A Review of Steven Urkowitz, Shakespeare's Revision of “King Lear” (Princeton University Press, 1980).’ Shakespeare Quarterly 36. 368–70.Google Scholar
. 1985b. ‘“An Important New Textual Study”: A Review of Peter W. M. Blayney, The Texts of “King Lear” and their Origins. Vol. 1: Nicholas Okes and the First Quarto (Cambridge University Press, 1982).’ Shakespeare Quarterly 36. 120–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1988a. ‘“Foul Papers” and “Prompt Books”: Printer's Copy for Shakespeare's Comedy of Errors.’ Studies in Bibliography 41. 232–46.Google Scholar
. 1988b. ‘McKerrow's “Suggestion” and Twentieth-Century Shakespeare Textual Criticism.’ Renaissance Drama. n.s. 19. 149–73.
. 1990. ‘Narratives About Printed Shakespeare Texts: “Foul Papers” and “Bad” Quartos.’ Shakespeare Quarterly 41. 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1995. ‘Shakespeare.’ Scholarly Editing: A Guide to Research. Ed. . New York. The Modern Language Association of America. 253–82.Google Scholar
. 1997. ‘Plays in Manuscript.’ In and (eds.). 481–97.
. 1998a. ‘Hypertext and Editorial Myth.’ 2.1–19. Online (http://purl.oclc.org/emls/). Internet. 17 May 1998. Early Modern Literary Studies 3.3. n. pag.
. 1998b. ‘Touring and the Construction of Shakespeare Textual Criticism.’ In and (eds.). 45–66.
. 1999a. ‘A Century of “Bad” Shakespeare Quartos.’ Shakespeare Quarterly 50. 310–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1999b. ‘Post-Theory Problems in Shakespeare Editing.’ Yearbook of English Studies 29. 103–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1999c. ‘Shakespeare, More or Less: A. W. Pollard and Twentieth-Century Shakespeare Editing.’ Florilegium 16. 125–45.Google Scholar
. 2000a. ‘Editing Shakespeare and Editing Without Shakespeare: Wilson, McKerrow, Greg, Bowers, Tanselle, and Copy-text Editing.’ TEXT: An Interdisciplinary Annual of Textual Studies 13. 27–53.Google Scholar
. 2000b. ‘Review of E. A. J. Honigmann, The Texts of “Othello” and Shakespearian Revision (London and New York: Routledge, 1996).’ Shakespeare Quarterly 51. 240–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2001. ‘Scribe or Compositor: Ralph Crane, Compositors D and F, and the First Four Plays in the Shakespeare First Folio.’ Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 95. 315–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2004. ‘Housmania: Episodes in Twentieth-century “Critical” Editing of Shakespeare.’ In and (eds.). 49–62.
. 2002. The Shakespeare First Folio: The History of the Book. Vol. 2: A New World Census of First Folios. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1919a. ‘Shakespeare's Hand in the Play of “Sir Thomas More”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 902 (1 May). 237.
1919b. ‘Shakespeare's Hand in the Play of “Sir Thomas More”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 905 (22 May). 279.
. 2008. ‘Changeling Bottom: Speech Prefixes, Acting, and Character in A Midsummer Night's Dream.’ Shakespeare 4. 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1608. The Painfull Adventures of Pericles Prince of Tyre. STC 25638.5. London. T[homas] P[urfoot] for Nat[haniel] Butter.Google Scholar
. 1989. ‘Review of William Shakespeare, The Complete Works, ed. Stanley Wells, Gary Taylor, John Jowett and William Montgomery (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986) and William Shakespeare, The Complete Works: Original Spelling Edition, ed. Stanley Wells, Gary Taylor, John Jowett and William Montgomery (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986) and Stanley Wells, Gary Taylor, John Jowett and William Montgomery, William Shakespeare: A Textual Companion (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987).’ Cahiers Élisabéthains 35. 103–17.
. 1956. ‘New Approaches to Textual Problems in Shakespeare.’ Studies in Bibliography 8. 3–14.Google Scholar
. 1602. The Art of Stenographie. STC 25744a. London. [William White] for Cuthbert Burby.Google Scholar
. 1932. The Printing of the First Folio of Shakespeare. Oxford. Oxford University Press for the Bibliographical Society.Google Scholar
1945. ‘Shakespeare and the “New Bibliography”.’ The Bibliographical Society, 1892–1942: Studies in Retrospect. Ed. . Bibliographical Society Publications in Large Quarto 4: For the year 1942. London. The Bibliographical Society. 76–135.Google Scholar
. 1918a. ‘The Copy for Hamlet, 1603.’ The Library. 3rd series 9. 153–85.
. 1918b. The Copy for Hamlet, 1603, and the Hamlet Transcript, 1593. London. Alexander Moring.Google Scholar
. 1918c. ‘The Hamlet Transcript, 1593.’ The Library. 3rd series 9. 217–47.
. 1919a. ‘Shakespeare's Hand in the Play of “Sir Thomas More”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 903 (8 May). 251.
. 1919b. ‘Shakespeare's Hand in the Play of “Sir Thomas More”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 906 (29 May). 295.
. 1934a. The Manuscript of Shakespeare's Hamlet and the Problems of its Transmission: An Essay in Critical Bibliography. Vol. 1: The Texts of 1605 and 1623. 2 vols. Shakespeare's Problems 4. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1934b. The Manuscript of Shakespeare's Hamlet and the Problems of its Transmission: An Essay in Critical Bibliography. Vol. 2: Editorial Problems and Solutions. 2 vols. Shakespeare's Problems 4. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1935a. ‘“The Genuine Text”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 1737 (16 May). 313.
. 1935b. ‘“The Genuine Text”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 1739 (30 May). 348.
. 1935c. ‘“The Genuine Text”: A Letter to the Editor.’ Times Literary Supplement Number 1741 (13 June). 380.
. 1963. The Manuscript of Shakespeare's Hamlet and the Problems of its Transmission: An Essay in Critical Bibliography. Reprinted with a new foreword by George Ian Duthie. Vol. 1: The Texts of 1605 and 1623. 2 vols. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1942. ‘Press Correction in Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century Quartos.’ Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 36. 187–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1985. ‘The Uses of Headlines: Peter Short's Shakespearian Quartos 1 Henry IV and Richard III.’ The Library (=Transactions of the Bibliographical Society). 6th series (=4th of Transactions of the Bibliographical Society) 7. 218–55.Google Scholar