Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5d6d958fb5-z6b88 Total loading time: 0.989 Render date: 2022-11-29T03:42:32.111Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

6 - The Comparative Study of Imitation Mechanisms in Non-Human Primates

from Part II - Imitation and Mimicry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2016

Sukhvinder S. Obhi
Affiliation:
McMaster University, Ontario
Emily S. Cross
Affiliation:
Bangor University
Get access

Summary

Despite more than 100 years of research, there is no agreement among experts as to whether or not primates can imitate. Part of the problem is that there is little agreement as to what constitutes an example of “imitation.” Nevertheless, recent research provides compelling evidence for both continuities and discontinuities in the psychological faculty that mediates imitation performance. A number of studies have shown that monkeys and apes are capable of copying familiar responses, but it is questionable whether they can also copy novel responses, particularly those involving novel tool-related actions. These results have been interpreted to mean that primates cannot engage in “imitation learning” or novel imitation. Yet there is some evidence showing that monkeys can imitate novel “cognitive” rules (i.e., ordinal rules of the form Apple-Boy-Cat) independently of copying specific motor responses. Rather than suggesting that monkeys and other primates are poor imitators, these results suggest that primates can learn novel cognitive rules but not novel motor rules, possibly because such skills require derived neural specializations in the Parietal Lobe linking social and physical cognitive skills. If true, such evidence represents an important discontinuity between the imitation skills of human and non-human primates with significant implications for human cognitive evolution.
Type
Chapter
Information
Shared Representations
Sensorimotor Foundations of Social Life
, pp. 109 - 135
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams-Curtis, L. (1987). Social context of manipulative behavior in Cebus apella. American Journal of Primatology, 12, 325.Google Scholar
Adams-Curtis, L., & Fragaszy, D. M. (1995). Influence of a skilled model on the behavior of conspecific observers in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). American Journal of Primatology, 37, 6571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akins, C. K., & Zentall, T. (1996). Imitative learning in male Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) using the two-action method. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 110, 316320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anisfeld, M. (1991). Neonatal imitation: Review. Developmental Review, 11(6097), 4(9), e302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anisfeld, M. (1996). Only tongue protrusion modeling is matched by neonates. Developmental Review, 16, 149161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anisfeld, M., Turkewitz, G., Rose, S. A., Rosenburg, F. R., Sheiber, F. J., et al. (2001). No compelling evidence that newborns imitate oral gestures. Infancy, 2(1), 111122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ankel-Simmons, F. (2000). Primate anatomy: An introduction. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google ScholarPubMed
Bard, K. A. (2007). Neonatal imitation in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) tested with two paradigms. Animal Cognition, 10(2), 233242. doi: 10.1007/s10071-006-0062-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bauer, P. J., & Mandler, J. M. (1992). Putting the horse before the cart: The use of temporal order in recall of events by one-year-old children. Developmental Psychology, 28(3), 441452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, B. B. (1972). Tool use in captive hamadryas baboons. Primates, 13, 277295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, B. B. (1973). Observation learning of tool use by captive Guinea baboons (Papio papio). American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 38(2), 579582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, B. B. (1976). Tool use by captive pigtailed macaques. Primates, 17, 301310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boesch, C., Marchesi, N., Fruth, B., & Joulian, F. (1994). Is nut cracking in wild chimpanzees a cultural behavior? Journal of Human Evolution, 26(4), 325338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boinski, S., Quatrone, R. P., Sughrue, K., Selvaggi, L., Henry, M., et al. (2003). Do brown capuchins socially learn foraging skills? In Fragaszy, D. M. & Perry, S. (Eds.), The biology of traditions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, R., (1994). Why does culture increase human adaptability? Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 125143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bshary, R. (2010). Decision making: Solving the battle of the fishes. Current Biology, 20(2), R70R71. doi: S0960-9822(09)02077-6 [pii] 10.1016/j.cub.2009.12.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bshary, R., & Grutter, A. S. (2006). Image scoring and cooperation in a cleaner fish mutualism. Nature, 441(7096), 975978. doi: nature04755 [pii] 10.1038/nature04755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugnyar, T., & Huber, L. (1997). Push or pull: An experimental study on imitation in marmosets. Animal Behaviour, 54(4), 817831. doi: ar960497 [pii].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byrne, R. W. (2005). Detecting, Understanding, and Explaining Imitation by Animals. In S. Hurley & N. Chater (Eds.), Perspectives on Imitation: From Neurosciences to Social Science (Vol. 1: Mechanisms of Imitation and Imitation in Animals, pp. 225242). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Byrne, R. W. (2005). Social cognition: Imitation, imitation, imitation. Current Biology, 15(13), R498R500. doi: S0960-9822(05)00666-4 [pii] 10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.031.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byrne, R. W., & Russon, A. E. (1998). Learning by imitation: A hierarchical approach. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 21, 667721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, C. A., & Whiten, A. (2004). Testing for social learning and imitation in common marmosets, Callithrix jacchus, using an artificial fruit. Animal Cognition, 7(2), 7785. doi: 10.1007/s10071-003-0192-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (1994). The social learning of tool use by orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus). Human Evolution, 9, 297313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Carpenter, M., Akhtar, N., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Fourteen- through 18-month-old infants differentially imitate intentional and accidental actions. Infant Behavior and Development, 21(2), 315330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, M., & Call, J. (2002). The chemistry of social learning. Developmental Science, 5(1), 2224.Google Scholar
Carruthers, P. (2006). The architecture of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamove, A. S. (1974). Failure to find rhesus observational learning. Journal of the Behavioral Sciences, 2, 3941.Google Scholar
Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 893910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheney, D. L., & Seyfarth, R. M. (1990). How monkeys see the world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cook, R., Bird, G., Lunser, G., Huck, S., & Heyes, C. (2012). Automatic imitation in a strategic context: Players of rock-paper-scissors imitate opponents’ gestures. Proceedings of the Biological Sciences/Royal Society, 279(1729), 780786. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csibra, G. (2003). Teleological and referential understanding of action in infancy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 358(1431), 447458. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Custance, D. M., Whiten, A., & Bard, K. A. (1995). Can young chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) imitate arbitrary actions? Hayes and Hayes (1952) revisited. Behaviour, 132, 837859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, B. V., & Foss, B. M. (1965). Observational learning in budgerigars. Animal Behaviour, 13, 470474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dindo, M., Thierry, B., & Whiten, A. (2008). Social diffusion of novel foraging methods in brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Proceedings of the Biological Sciences/Royal Society, 275(1631), 187193. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, P. F., Paukner, A., Ruggiero, A., Darcey, L., Unbehagen, S., & Suomi, S. J. (2009). Interindividual differences in neonatal imitation and the development of action chains in rhesus macaques. Child Development, 80(4), 10571068. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01316.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrari, P. F., Visalberghi, E., Paukner, A., Fogassi, L., Ruggiero, A., & Suomi, S. J. (2006). Neonatal imitation in rhesus macaques. PLOS Biology, 4(9), e302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fragaszy, D. M., Izar, P., Visalberghi, E., Ottoni, E. B., & de Oliveira, M. G. (2004). Wild capuchin monkeys (Cebus libidinosus) use anvils and stone pounding tools. American Journal of Primatology. 64(4), 359366. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20085.Google Scholar
Fragaszy, D. M., & Perry, S. (2003). The Biology of Traditions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fragaszy, D. M., & Visalberghi, E. (1989). Social influences on the acquisition of tool-using behaviors in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 103(2), 159170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fragaszy, D. M., (1990). Social processes affecting the appearance of innovative behaviors in capuchin monkeys. Folia Primatologica (Basel), 54(3–4), 155165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fragaszy, D. M., (1996). Social learning in monkeys: Primate ‘primacy’ reconsidered. In Galef, B. G. & Heyes, C. (Eds.), Social learning in animals: The roots of culture. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 65–84.Google Scholar
Fragaszy, D. M., (2004). Socially biased learning in monkeys. Learning & Behavior, 32(1), 2435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, S. H. (2008). Tool use, communicative gesture and cerebral asymmetries in the modern human brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1499), 19511957. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galef, B. G. (1988). Imitation in animals: History, definition, and interpretation of data from the psychological laboratory. In Galef, Z. (Ed.), Social learning: Psychological and biological perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 328.Google Scholar
Galef, B. G. (1996). Social learning and imitation. In Heyes, G. (Ed.), Social learning in animals: The roots of culture. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Giret, N., Peron, F., Nagle, L., Kreutzer, M., & Bovet, D. (2009). Spontaneous categorization of vocal imitations in African grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus). Behavioural Processes, 82(3), 244248. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.07.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodall, J. (1986). The chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of behavior. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gumert, M. D., Hoong, L. K., & Malaivijitnond, S. (2011). Sex differences in the stone tool-use behavior of a wild population of Burmese long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis aurea). American Journal of Primatology, 73(12), 12391249. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, K. R. L. (1963). Observational learning in monkeys and apes. British Journal of Psychology, 54(3), 201226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haslam, M., Gumert, M. D., Biro, D., Carvalho, S., & Malaivijitnond, S. (2013). Use-wear patterns on wild macaque stone tools reveal their behavioural history. PLoS One, 8(8), e72872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herrmann, E., Call, J., Hernandez-Lloreda, M. V., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Humans have evolved specialized skills of social cognition: The cultural intelligence hypothesis. Science, 317(5843), 13601366. doi: 10.1126/science.1146282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyes, C. (1994). Social learning in animals: Categories and mechanisms. Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 69(2), 207231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heyes, C. (2011a). Automatic imitation. Psychological Bulletin, 137(3), 463483. doi: 10.1037/a0022288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heyes, C. (2011b). What’s social about social learning? Journal of Comparative Psychology, 126(2), 193202. doi: 10.1037/a0025180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyes, C. (2012). What’s social about social learning?. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 126(2), 193202. doi: 10.1037/a0025180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heyes, C., Bird, G., Johnson, H., & Haggard, P. (2005). Experience modulates automatic imitation. Cognitive Brain Research, 22(2), 233240. doi: S0926-6410(04)00241-1 [pii] 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.09.009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopper, L. M. (2010). ‘Ghost’ experiments and the dissection of social learning in humans and animals. Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 85(4), 685–701. doi: BRV120 [pii] 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00120.x.
Hopper, L. M., Lambeth, S. P., Schapiro, S. J., & Whiten, A. (2008). Observational learning in chimpanzees and children studied through ‘ghost’ conditions. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 275(1636), 835840. doi: JKG55Q617P253P61 [pii] 10.1098/rspb.2007.1542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopper, L. M., Schapiro, S., Lambeth, S. P., & Brosnan, S. (2011). Chimpanzees’ socially maintained food preferences indicate both conservatism and conformity. Animal Behaviour, 81, 11951202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horner, V., & Whiten, A. (2005). Causal knowledge and imitation/emulation switching in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and children (Homo sapiens). Animal Cognition, 8(3), 164181. doi: 10.1007/s10071-004-0239-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horner, V., (2007). Learning from others’ mistakes? Limits on understanding a trap-tube task by young chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and children (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 121(1), 1221. doi: 2007-01892-002 [pii] 10.1037/0735-7036.121.1.12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horner, V., Whiten, A., Flynn, E., & de Waal, F. B. (2006). Faithful replication of foraging techniques along cultural transmission chains by chimpanzees and children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(37), 1387813883. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0606015103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horowitz, A. C. (2003). Do humans ape? Or do apes human? Imitation and intention in humans (Homo sapiens) and other animals. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 117(3), 325336. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.117.3.325 2003-07738-013 [pii].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, C. T., & Charman, T. (2005). Gradations of emulation learning in infants’ imitation of actions on objects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 276302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iacoboni, M. (2009). Neurobiology of imitation. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 19(6), 661665. doi: Doi 10.1016/J.Conb.2009.09.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, S. (1979). Matching behavior in the young infant. Child Development, 30, 425430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeggi, A. V., Dunkel, L. P., Van Noordwijk, M. A., Wich, S. A., Sura, A. A., & Van Schaik, C. P. (2010). Social learning of diet and foraging skills by wild immature Bornean orangutans: Implications for culture. American Journal of Primatology, 72(1), 6271. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janik, V. M., & Slater, P. J. (2000). The different roles of social learning in vocal communication. Animal Behaviour, 60(1), 111. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1410 S0003-3472(00)91410–6 [pii].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, S. S. (1996). Imitation or exploration? Young infants’ matching of adults’ oral gestures. Child Development, 67(5), 19521969.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, S. S. (2006). Exploration or imitation? The effect of music on 4-week-old infants’ tongue protrusions. Infant Behavior and Development, 29(1), 126130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, S. S. (2009). The development of imitation in infancy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1528), 23252335. doi: 364/1528/2325 [pii] 10.1098/rstb.2009.0045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, L., & Sol, D. (2008). Brains, lifestyles and cognition: Are there general trends? Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 72(2), 135144. doi: 10.1159/000151473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leighton, J., & Heyes, C. (2010). Hand to mouth: Automatic imitation across effector systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(5), 11741183. doi: 2010-17383-001 [pii] 10.1037/a0019953.Google ScholarPubMed
Leslie, A. M. (1994). ToMM, ToBy, and Agency: Core architecture and domain specificity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, D. E., Santos, L. R., & Keil, F. C. (2006). Reflections of other minds: How primate social cognition can inform the function of mirror neurons. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16(2), 230234. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2006.03.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, D. E., Young, A. G., & Keil, F. C. (2007). The hidden structure of overimitation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(50), 1975119756. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0704452104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maier, W. (1984). Tooth morphology and dietary specialization. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantell, J. T., & Pfordresher, P. Q. (2013). Vocal imitation of song and speech. Cognition, 127(2), 177202. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.12.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Martin, C. F., Biro, D., & Matsuzawa, T. (2011). Chimpanzees’ use of conspecific cues in matching-to-sample tasks: Public information use in a fully automated testing environment. Animal Cognition, 14(6), 893902. doi: 10.1007/s10071-011-0424-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuzawa, T., Tomonaga, M., & Tanaka, M. (2006). Cognitive development in chimpanzees. Tokyo, New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuzawa, T., Tomonaga, M., (2011). Cognitive development in chimpanzees. Tokyo, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Melis, A. P., & Tomasello, M. (2013). Chimpanzees’ (Pan troglodytes) strategic helping in a collaborative task. Biology Letters, 9(2), 20130009. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N. (1988). The human infant as Homo imitans. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Meltzoff, A. N. (1999). Origins of theory of mind, cognition and communication. Journal of Communication Disorders, 32(4), 251269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science, 198(4312), 7578. doi: 198/4312/75 [pii] 10.1126/science.198.4312.75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N., (1997). Explaining facial imitation: A theoretical model. Early Development and Parenting, 6, 179192.3.0.CO;2-R>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercader, J., Barton, H., Gillespie, J., Harris, J., Kuhn, S., et al. (2007). 4,300-year-old chimpanzee sites and the origins of percussive stone technology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(9), 30433048. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607909104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercader, J., Panger, M., & Boesch, C. (2002). Excavation of a chimpanzee stone tool site in the African rainforest. Science, 296(5572), 14521455. doi: 10.1126/science.1070268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitani, J. C., & Watts, D. P. (1999). Demographic influences on the hunting behavior of chimpanzees. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 109(4), 439454.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, C. L. (1900). Animal behaviour. London: Edward Arnold.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulcahy, N. J., & Call, J. (2006). How great apes perform on a modified trap-tube task. Animal Cognition, 9(3), 193199. doi: 10.1007/s10071-006-0019-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myowa-Yamakoshi, M., & Matsuzawa, T. (1999). Factors influencing imitation of manipulatory actions in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 2, 128136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myowa-Yamakoshi, M., Tomonaga, M., Tanaka, M., & Matsuzawa, T. (2004). Imitation in neonatal chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Developmental Science, 7(4), 437442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagell, K., Olguin, R., & Tomasello, M. (1993). Processes of social learning in the tool use of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and human children (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 107, 174186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nehaniv, C., & Dautenhahn, K. (2002). The correspondence problem. In Dautenhahn, K. & Nehaniv, C. (Eds.), Imitation in animals and artifacts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 4161.Google Scholar
Nguyen, N. H., Klein, E. D., & Zentall, T. R. (2005). Imitation of a two-action sequence by pigeons. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(3), 514518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panger, M., Perry, S., Rose, L. M., Gros-Louis, J., Vogel, E., et al. (2000). Cross-site differences in foraging behavior of white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus). American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 119(5266).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, W., Barnes, J. L., Mahajan, N., Yamaguchi, M., & Santos, L. R. (2009). ‘Unwilling’ versus ‘unable’: Capuchin monkeys’ (Cebus apella) understanding of human intentional action. Developmental Science, 12(6), 938945. doi: DESC840 [pii] 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00840.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Potts, R. (1998). Variability selection in hominid evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology, 7, 8196.3.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potts, R. (2004). Paleoenvironmental basis of cognitive evolution in great apes. American Journal of Primatology, 62, 209228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Povinelli, D. (2000). Folk physics for apes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raihani, N. J., Grutter, A. S., & Bshary, R. (2010). Punishers benefit from third-party punishment in fish. Science, 327(5962), 171. doi: 327/5962/171 [pii] 10.1126/science.1183068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, E., & Heyes, C. (2011). Imitation in infancy: the wealth of the stimulus. Dev Sci, 14(1), 92105. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00961.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reader, S. M., Hager, Y., & Laland, K. N. (2011). The evolution of primate general and cultural intelligence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1567), 10171027. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reader, S. M., & Laland, K. N. (2002). Social intelligence, innovation, and enhanced brain size in primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(7), 44364441. doi: 10.1073/pnas.062041299 062041299 [pii].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaik, C. P. van, Ancrenaz, M., Borgen, G., Galdikas, B., Knott, C. D., et al. (2003). Orangutan cultures and the evolution of material culture. Science, 299(5603), 102105. doi: 10.1126/science.1078004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, A. C., Melis, A. P., & Tomasello, M. (2012). How chimpanzees solve collective action problems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279(1749), 49464954. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1948.Google ScholarPubMed
Seed, A. M., Call, J., Emery, N. J., & Clayton, N. S. (2009). Chimpanzees solve the trap problem when the confound of tool-use is removed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1, 2334.Google Scholar
Snowdon, C. T., & Boe, C. Y. (2003). Social communication about unpalatable foods in tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 117(2), 142148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spelke, E. S., & Kinzler, K. D. (2007). Core knowledge. Developmental Science, 10(1), 8996. doi: DESC569 [pii] 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00569.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoeger, A. S., Mietchen, D., Oh, S., de Silva, S., Herbst, C. T., et al. (2012). An Asian elephant imitates human speech. Current Biology, 22(22), 21442148. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.09.022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Subiaul, F. (2007). The imitation faculty in monkeys: Evaluating its features, distribution and evolution. Journal of Anthropological Sciences, 85, 3562.Google Scholar
Subiaul, F. (2010). Dissecting the imitation faculty: The multiple imitation mechanisms (MIM) hypothesis. Behavioural Processes, 83(2), 222234. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.12.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Subiaul, F. (2016). What’s special about human imitation? A comparison with enculturated apes. Behavioral Sciences, 6(16), doi:10.3390/bs6030013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Subiaul, F., Anderson, S., Brandt, J., & Elkins, J. (2012). Multiple imitation mechanisms in children. Developmental Psychology, 48(4), 11651179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Subiaul, F., Cantlon, J. F., Holloway, R. L., & Terrace, H. S. (2004). Cognitive imitation in rhesus macaques. Science, 305(5682), 407410. doi: 10.1126/science.1099136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Subiaul, F., Lurie, H., Kathryn, R., Klein, T., Holmes, D., & Terrace, H. S. (2007). Cognitive imitation in typically-developing 3- and 4-year olds and individuals with autism. Cognitive Development, 22, 230243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subiaul, F., Patterson, E. M.,, Barr, R. (2016). The Cognitive Structure of Goal Emulation in Preschool Age Children: Recruitment of multiple learning processes. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 34, 132149; doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subiaul, F., Vonk, J., Okamoto-Barth, S., & Barth, J. (2008). Do chimpanzees learn reputation by observation? Evidence from direct and indirect experience with generous and selfish strangers. Animal Cognition, 11(4), 611623. doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0151-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Subiaul, F., Vonk, J., & Rutherford, M. D. (2011). The ghosts in the computer: The role of agency and animacy attributions in ‘ghost controls’. PLoS One, 6(11), e26429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subiaul, F., Winters, K., Krumpak, K., & Core, C. (2015). Vocal overimitation in preschool age children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 145–60.Google Scholar
Tennie, C., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Push or pull: Imitation versus emulation in human children and great apes. Ethology, 112, 11591169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tennie, C., Call, J., (2009). Ratcheting up the ratchet: On the evolution of cumulative culture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1528), 24052415. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0052.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tennie, C., Call, J., (2010a). Evidence for emulation in chimpanzees in social settings using the floating peanut task. PloS One, 5, e10544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tennie, C., Greve, K., Gretscher, H., & Call, J. (2010b). Two-year-old children copy more reliably and more often than nonhuman great apes in multiple observational learning tasks. Primates: Journal of Primatology, 4, 337351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tennie, C., Hedwig, D., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008). An experimental study of nettle feeding in captive gorillas. American Journal of Primatology, 70(6), 584593. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, D. E., & Russell, J. (2004). The ghost condition: Imitation versus emulation in young children’s observational learning. Developmental Psychology, 40, 882889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorndike, E. L. (1898). Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals. Psychological Review Monographs Supplement, 2(8).Google Scholar
Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal intelligence. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Thorpe, W. H. (1956). Learning and instinct in animals. London: Methuen.Google ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M. (1990). Cultural transmission in the tool use and communicatory signaling of chimpanzees? In Parker, S. & Gibson, K. (Eds.), ‘Language’ and intelligence in monkeys and apes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 274311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2014). A natural history of human thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M., & Call, J. (1997). Primate cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M., Davis-Dasilva, M., Camak, L., & Bard, K. (1987). Observational learning of tool-use by young chimpanzees. Journal of Human Evolution, 2, 175186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visalberghi, E., & Addessi, E. (2000). Seeing group members eating a familiar food enhances the acceptance of novel foods in capuchin monkeys. Animal Behaviour, 1, 6976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visalberghi, E., (2001). Acceptance of novel foods in capuchin monkeys: Do specific social facilitation and visual stimulus enhancement play a role? Animal Behaviour, 62, 567576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visalberghi, E., & Fragaszy, D. M. (1990). Do monkeys ape? In Parker, S. & Gibson, K. (Eds.), Language’ and intelligence in monkeys and apes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 247273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visalberghi, E., Fragaszy, D. M., & Savage-Rumbaugh, S. (1995a). Performance in a tool-using task by common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), bonobos (Pan paniscus), an orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus), and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 109(1), 5260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visalberghi, E., Fragaszy, D. M., (1995b). Performance in a tool-using task by common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), bonobos (Pan paniscus), an orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus), and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 109(1), 5260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voelkl, B., & Huber, L. (2000). True imitation in marmosets. Animal Behaviour, 60(2), 195202. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1457 S0003-3472(00)91457-X [pii].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voelkl, B., (2007). Imitation as faithful copying of a novel technique in marmoset monkeys. PLoS One, 2(7), e611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waal, E. van de, Borgeaud, C., & Whiten, A. (2013). Potent social learning and conformity shape a wild primate’s foraging decisions. Science, 340(6131), 483485. doi: 10.1126/science.1232769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waal, E. van de, Bshary, R., & Whiten, A. (2014). Wild vervet monkey infants acquire the food-processing variants of their mothers. Animal Behaviour, 90, 4145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waal, E. van de, & Whiten, A. (2012). Spontaneous emergence, imitation and spread of alternative foraging techniques among groups of vervet monkeys. PLoS One, 7(10), e47008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047008.
Waal, F. B. M. de. (1998). Chimpanzee politics, power and sex among apes. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Whiten, A. (1998). Imitation of the sequential structure of actions by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 112(3), 270281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiten, A., Custance, D. M., Gomez, J. C., Teixidor, P., & Bard, K. A. (1996). Imitative learning of artificial fruit processing in children (Homo sapiens) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 1, 314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiten, A., Goodall, J., McGrew, W. C., Nishida, T., Reynolds, V., et al. (1999). Cultures in chimpanzees. Nature, 399(6737), 682685. doi: 10.1038/21415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiten, A., & Ham, R. (1992). On the nature and evolution of imitation in the animal kingdom: Reappraisal of a century of research. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 21, 239283.CrossRef
Whiten, A., Horner, V., Litchfield, C., & Marshall-Pescini, S. (2004). How do apes ape? Learning and Behavior, 32, 3652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whiten, A., Horner, V., & de Waal, F. B. (2005). Conformity to cultural norms of tool use in chimpanzees. Nature, 437(7059), 737740. doi: nature04047 [pii] 10.1038/nature04047.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whiten, A., McGuigan, N., Marshall-Pescini, S., & Hopper, L. M. (2009a). Emulation, imitation, over-imitation and the scope of culture for child and chimpanzee. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 364(1528), 24172428. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0069.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whiten, A., McGuigan, N., Marshall-Pescini, S., (2009b). Emulation, imitation, over-imitation and the scope of culture for child and chimpanzee. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1528), 24172428. doi: 364/1528/2417 [pii] 10.1098/rstb.2009.0069.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, B. W., Wright, K. A., Chalk, J., Verderane, M. P., Fragaszy, D., et al. (2009). Fallback foraging as a way of life: Using dietary toughness to compare the fallback signal among capuchins and implications for interpreting morphological variation. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 140(4), 687699. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.21116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zentall, T. R. (2006). Imitation: Definitions, evidence, and mechanisms. Animal Cognition, 9(4), 335353. doi: 10.1007/s10071-006-0039-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zentall, T. R. (2012). Perspectives on observational learning in animals. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 126(2), 114128. doi: 10.1037/a0025381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×