Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-59f8fd8595-hk2jd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-03-22T12:51:38.017Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

11 - Memory Consolidation and Transformation: The Hippocampus and Mental Time Travel

from Section B - Cognitive and Social Neuroscience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2016

Robert J. Sternberg
Cornell University, New York
Susan T. Fiske
Princeton University, New Jersey
Donald J. Foss
University of Houston
Get access



Older adults with failing memories often state that they have difficulty remembering what happened to them yesterday, yet they can remember very well events that occurred when they were in high school or college. These impressions were probably noted from time immemorial, but they were given scientific credibility by Ribot, a nineteenth-century French neurologist, who proposed that following brain damage, recent memories are more likely to be lost than remote ones. Even relatively mild damage, such as a concussion sustained during sport or in a car accident, will cause similar effects. The reason given for this pattern of lost and preserved memories is that remote memories were consolidated (made relatively permanent) in the brain before the onset of damage (or deterioration, in the case of older adults), whereas the damage hindered the consolidation of more recent memories and left them vulnerable to decay or interference.

In the 1950s, Brenda Milner and her collaborators, William Scoville and Wilder Penfield, reported that damage to the hippocampus, a region on the inside surface of the medial temporal lobes, which lie next to your temples, leads to a profound amnesia that conformed to Ribot's Law. Henry Molaison (H.M.), the most celebrated of the neurosurgical patients, could acquire few, if any, memories of which he was consciously aware from the time of his surgery in 1953 to his death in 2008. Initial, casual observation indicated, however, that he remembered events that occurred prior to his surgery very well. Based on this evidence, and that of similar cases, investigators concluded that the hippocampus is a temporary memory structure that helps retain and retrieve memories until they are consolidated in other parts of the brain. Once consolidated, the hippocampus is no longer needed for their retention or recovery; these functions would now be mediated by other parts of the brain. This was the standard consolidation theory accepted by most neuroscientists and enshrined in most textbooks.

My Contribution

Fifty years after the report on H.M. was published, the standard consolidation theory reigned supreme. Lynn Nadel, Gordon Winocur, and I, with the help of our students and collaborators, dethroned this theory and replaced it with an alternative, which has evolved into the “Multiple Trace Theory and Trace Transformation.” According to this theory, every time you consciously experience a new event or think of an old one, the hippocampus automatically lays down a memory trace.

Scientists Making a Difference
One Hundred Eminent Behavioral and Brain Scientists Talk about Their Most Important Contributions
, pp. 53 - 57
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Nadel, L., & Moscovitch, M. (1997). Memory consolidation, retrograde amnesia and the hippocampal complex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 7, 217–227.Google Scholar
Winocur, G., Moscovitch, M., & Bontempi, B. (2010). Memory formation and long-term retention in humans and animals: Convergence towards a transformation account of hippocampal-neocortical interactions. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2339–2356.Google Scholar
Moscovitch, M., Cabeza, R., Winocur, G., & Nadel, L. (2016). Episodic memory and beyond: The hippocampus and neocortex in transformation. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 105–134.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats