Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-r7bls Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-11T18:16:05.582Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - In defense of legislation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

Jeremy Waldron
Affiliation:
New York University and University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

The first lecture in this series used the facts of an American case, Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, to pose a question about the possibility of a special relation between private property and the ideal we call the Rule of Law. The case concerned a property developer, who bought ocean-front real estate intending to develop it as residential property for resale. Unfortunately (or fortunately, depending on your point of view), his plans were thwarted by new environmental regulations intended to protect the coastline from erosion. The developer sued under the Takings Clause of the US Constitution, on the ground that the regulations deprived his property of all or almost all of its value, and his argument was accepted by a majority in the Supreme Court of the United States.

I said that I was not interested in arguing about American constitutional law, but that I wanted to use the facts of Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council to raise a question about the relation between private property and the Rule of Law. Is the property developer’s complaint one that can be made in the name of the Rule of Law? Can he proceed with it on the assumption that the Rule of Law should protect his property against this sort of regulation? Or is the ideal of the Rule of Law neutral in this matter, given that there is law on both sides of the equation – law inasmuch as Mr. Lucas’s property rights are legal rights but law also inasmuch as the restriction on development that he faces represents the application of a properly enacted statute?

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Wechsler, HerbertToward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law,”Harvard Law Review 73 1959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, EdwardLaw and Legislation in the Administrative State,”Columbia Law Review 89 1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooter, RobertThe Law and Economics of DevelopmentGreenwich, CTJAI Press 1997Google Scholar
Bentham, JeremyOf Laws in GeneralLondonAthlone Press 1970Google Scholar
Postema, GeraldBentham and the Common Law TraditionOxfordOxford University Press 1986Google Scholar
Sachs, J.D.Pistor, K.The Rule of Law and Economic Reform in RussiaWestview 1997Google Scholar
Shihata, I.The World Bank in a Changing WorldBostonMartinus Nijhoff 2000Google Scholar
Williamson, J.Democracy and the ‘Washington Consensus’,”World Development 21 1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ngugi, J. M.Policing Neo-Liberal Reforms: The Rule of Law as an Enabling and Restrictive Discourse,”University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 26 2005Google Scholar
Carothers, ThomasThe Rule of Law Revival,”Foreign Affairs 77 1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shihata, I.The World Bank in a Changing World: Selected EssaysBostonMartinus Nijhoff 1991Google Scholar
Shihata, I.The World Bank in a Changing WorldBostonMartinus Nijhoff 1995Google Scholar
Carothers, ThomasRule of Law Temptations,”Fletcher Forum 33 2009Google Scholar
Barro, RobertGetting It Right: Markets and Choices in a Free SocietyCambridge, MAMIT Press 1996Google Scholar
Waldron, JeremyThe Least Examined Branch: The Role of Legislatures in the Constitutional StateCambridgeCambridge University Press 2006Google Scholar
Taylor, MichaelCommunity, Anarchy and LibertyCambridgeCambridge University Press 1982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, JeremyThe Rule of Recognition and the US ConstitutionOxfordOxford University Press 2009Google Scholar
Waldron, Law and DisagreementOxfordClarendon Press 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Legislating with Integrity,”Fordham Law Review 72 2003Google Scholar
Waldron, JeremyParliamentary Recklessness: Why We Need to Legislate More Carefully,”New Zealand Law Journal 2008 458Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×