Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-pd9xq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T20:23:52.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Postmodern reflections on ‘risk’, ‘hazards’ and life choices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2009

Deborah Lupton
Affiliation:
Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, New South Wales
Get access

Summary

Introduction: risk, hazards and modernity

Before the era of modernity, risk was a neutral term, concerned merely with probabilities, with losses and gains. A gamble or an endeavour that was associated with high risk meant simply that there was great potential for significant loss or significant reward. However, in the modern period, risk has been co-opted as a term reserved for a negative or undesirable outcome, and as such, is synonymous with the terms danger or hazard. Thus the British Medical Association's (1987: 13) guide Living with Risk describes a hazard as ‘a set of circumstances which may cause harmful consequences’, while risk is ‘the likelihood of its doing so’. Furthermore, this hazard/risk differentiation introduces a moral dimension, such that the perpetrators of risk may be held to account in some way or other (Douglas, 1992: 22–5). This chapter explores this dichotomy, and develops a postmodern position that challenges more traditional readings.

The science of risk calculation, assessment and evaluation is emblematic of modernism and its commitments to progress through rationalization: from the actuarial tables of life insurers to the risk analysis of those in the business of risk: the movers and shakers of capitalism (Hassler, 1993). In what might almost be a handbook for such entrepreneurial activity, Johnstone-Bryden (1995: 1), in a monograph sub-titled How to Work Successfully with Risk, offers a blueprint for ‘how risks can be identified and reduced economically and effectively, before serious damage occurs’. Hertz and Thomas (1983: 1) describe risk analysis as methods which seek a ‘comprehensive understanding and awareness’ of the risks associated with a given setting.

Type
Chapter
Information
Risk and Sociocultural Theory
New Directions and Perspectives
, pp. 12 - 33
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×