Ajmone-Marsan, P., Fernado Garcia, J., and Lenstra, J.A. (2010). On the origin of cattle: how aurochs became cattle and colonized the world. Evolutionary Anthropology, 19, 148–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armstrong, D.P., Davidson, R.S., Dimond, W.J., et al. (2002). Population dynamics of reintroduced forest birds on New Zealand islands. Journal of Biogeography, 29, 609–621.Google Scholar

Basse, B., Flux, I., and Innes, J. (2003). Recovery and maintenance of North Island kokako Callaeas cinerea wilsoni populations through pulsed pest control. Biological Conservation, 109, 259–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, B.B., Rapaport, L.G., Stanley Price, M., and Wilson, A.C. (1994). Reintroduction of captive-born animals. In Olney, P.J.S., Mace, G.M., and Feistner, A.T.C. (Eds.), Creative conservation: interactive management of wild and captive animals (pp. 265–286). London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bengsen, A.J., Gentle, M.N., Mitchell, J.L., Pearson, H.E., and Saunders, G.R. (2014). Impacts and management of wild pigs Sus scrofa in Australia. Mammal Review, 44, 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

BirdLife International. (2017). Species factsheet: Callaeas wilsoni. www.birdlife.org (accessed 17 August 2017). Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2017) IUCN Red List for birds. www.birdlife.org (accessed 17 August 2017).Google Scholar

Burney, D.A., Juvik, J.O., Pigot Burney, L., and Diagne, T. (2012). Can unwanted suburban tortoises rescue native Hawaiian plants? The Tortoise, 2012, 104–115.Google Scholar

Byers, J.E., Cuddington, K., Jones, C.G., et al. (2006). Using ecosystem engineers to restore ecological systems. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21, 493–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carrell, S. (2007). Scotland, home to free prescriptions, council houses and the wild beaver. www.theguardian.com/politics/2007/dec/24/uk.scotlandGoogle Scholar

Chauvenet, A.L.M., Ewen, J.G., Armstrong, D.P., et al. (2012). Does supplemental feeding affect the viability of translocated populations? The example of the hihi. Animal Conservation, 15, 337–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chauvenet, A.L.M., Ewen, J.G., Armstrong, D.P., and Pettorelli, N. (2013). Saving the hihi under climate change: a case for assisted colonization. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50, 1330–1340.Google Scholar

Chauvenet, A.L.M., Canessa, S., and Ewen, J.G. (2016). Setting objectives and defining the success of reintroductions. In Jachowski, D.S., Slowtow, R., Angermeier, P.L., and Millspaugh, J.J. (Eds.), Reintroduction of fish and wildlife populations (pp. 105–122). Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Converse, S.J., and Armstrong, D.P. (2016). Demographic modelling for reintroduction decision-making. In Jachowski, D.S., Slowtow, R., Angermeier, P.L., and Millspaugh, J.J. (Eds.), Reintroduction of fish and wildlife populations (pp. 123–146). Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Cook, C.N., Morgan, D.G., and Marshall, D.J. (2010). Reevaluating suitable habitat for reintroductions: lessons learnt from the eastern barred bandicoot recovery program. Animal Conservation, 13, 184–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corlett, R.T. (2013). The shifted baseline: prehistoric defaunation in the tropics and its consequences for biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 163, 13–21.Google Scholar

Corlett, R.T. (2016). Restoration, reintroduction, and rewilding in a changing world. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31, 453–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donlan, J., Greene, H.W., Berger, J., et al. (2005). Re-wilding North America. Nature, 436, 913–914.Google Scholar

Dzięciołowski, R., and Gozdziewski, J. (1999). The reintroduction of European beaver, Castor fiber, in Poland. In Busher, P.E. and Gozdziewski, J. (Eds.), Beaver protection, management, and utilization in Europe and North America (pp. 31–35). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar

Ericsson, G., and Heberlein, T.A. (2003). Attitudes of hunters, locals, and the general public in Sweden now that the wolves are back. Biological Conservation, 111, 149–159.Google Scholar

Ewen, J.G., Armstrong, D.P., Parker, K.A., and Seddon, P.J. (Eds.) (2012). Reintroduction biology: integrating science and management. Conservation Science and Practice no. 9. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Fischer, J., and Lindenmayer, D.B. (2000). An assessment of the published results of animal relocations. Biological Conservation, 96, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaywood, M. J. (2015). Beavers in Scotland: a report to the Scottish Government. Inverness, UK: Scottish National Heritage.Google Scholar

Gibbs, J.P., Marquez, C., and Sterling, E.J. (2008). The role of endangered species reintroduction in ecosystem restoration: tortoise–cactus interactions on Espanola Island, Galapagos. Restoration Ecology, 16, 88093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gregory, R., Failing, L., Harstone, M., Long, G., McDaniels, T., and Ohlson, D. (2012). Structured decision making: a practical guide to environmental management choices. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Griffith, B., Scott, J.M., Carpenter, J.W., and Reed, C. (1989). Translocation as a species conservation tool: status and strategy. Science, 245, 477–480.Google Scholar

Griffiths, C.J., Hansen, D.M., Jones, C.G., Zuel, N., and Harris, S. (2011). Resurrecting extinct interactions with extant substitutes. Current Biology, 21, 762–765.Google Scholar

Gurnell, A.M. (1998). The hydrogeomorphological effects of beaver dam-building activity. Progress in Physical Geography, 22, 167–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansen, D.M., and Galetti, M. (2009). The forgotten megafauna. Science, 324, 42–43.Google Scholar

Hansen, D.M., Dinlan, J.C., Griffiths, C.J., and Campbell, K.J. (2010). Ecological history and latent conservation potential: large and giant tortoises as a model or taxon substitions. Ecography, 33, 272–284.Google Scholar

Harrington, L.A., Moehrenschlager, A., Gelling, M., Atkinson, R.P.D., Hughes, J., and McDonald, D.W. (2013). Conflicting and complementary ethics in animal welfare considerations in reintroductions. Conservation Biology, 27, 486–500.Google Scholar

IUCN/SSC. (2013). Guidelines for reintroductions and other conservation translocations. IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, United Kingdom. www.iucnsscrsg.org/Google Scholar

IUCN/SSC. (2016). IUCN SSC guiding principles on creating proxies of extinct species for conservation benefit. Version 1.0. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN Species Survival Commission.Google Scholar

Kearney, M.R., Wintle, B.A., and Porter, W.P. (2010). Correlative and mechanistic models of species distribution provide congruent forecasts under climate change. Conservation Letters, 3, 203–213.Google Scholar

Kemp, L., Norbury, G., Groenewegen, R., and Comer, S. (2015). The roles of trials and experiments in fauna reintroduction programs. In Armstrong, D.P., Hayward, M.W., Moro, D., and Seddon, P.J. (Eds.), Advances in reintroduction biology of Australian and New Zealand fauna (pp. 73–90). Victoria, Australia: CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar

Mallon, D.P., and Stanley Price, M.R. (2013). The fall of the wild. Oryx, 47, 467–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKinstry, M.C., and Anderson, S.H. (1999). Attitudes of private and public land managers in Wyoming, USA, toward beaver. Environmental Management, 23, 95–101.Google Scholar

McKnight, R. (2014). Rewilding the European landscape: an unconventional approach to land management. City Wild. Paper 8. http://digitalcommons.esf.edu/citywild/8Google Scholar

Mills, L.S., Soulé, M.E., and Doak, D.F. (1993). The keystone species concept in ecology and conservation. BioScience, 43, 219–224.Google Scholar

Milne, A., and Stocker, R. (2014). Evidence for the continued existence of the South Island kokako Callaeas cinerea drawn from reports collected between January 1990 and June 2012. Notornis, 61, 137–143Google Scholar

Nilsen, E.B., Milner-Gulland, E.J., Schofield, L., Mysterud, A., Stenseth, N.C., and Coulsen, T. (2007). Wolf reintroduction to Scotland: public attitudes and consequences for red deer management. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 274, 995–1002.Google Scholar

Nogues-Bravo, D., Rodriguez, J., Hortal, J., Batra, P., and Araujo, M.B. (2008). Climate change, humans, and the extinction of the woolly mammoth. PLoS Biology. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060079Google Scholar

O’Connell, M.J., Atkinson, S.R., Gamez, K., Pickering, S.P., and Dutton, J.S. (2008). Forage preferences of the European beaver Castor fiber: implications for re-introduction. Conservation and Society, 62, 190–194.Google Scholar

Osborne, P.E., and Seddon, P.J. (2012). Selecting suitable habitats for reintroductions: variation, change and the role of species distribution modelling. In Ewen, J.G., Armstrong, D.P., Parker, K.A., and Seddon, P.J. (Eds.), Reintroduction biology: integrating science and management. Conservation Science and Practice no. 9 (pp. 73–104). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Pate, J., Manfredo, M.J., Bright, A.D., and Tischbein, G. (1996). Coloradans’ attitudes towards reintroducing the grey wolf into Colorado. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 24, 421–428.Google Scholar

Pillai, A., and Heptinstall, D. (2013). Twenty years of the Habitats Directive: a case study on species reintroduction, protection and management. Environmental Law Review, 15, 27–46.Google Scholar

Rewilding Europe. (2017). www.rewildingeurope.com (accessed 10 August 2017).Google Scholar

Rewilding Institute. (2017). https://rewilding.org/rewildit/our-programs/ (accessed 10 August 2017).Google Scholar

Ripple, W.J., and Beschta, R.L. (2004). Wolves and the ecology of fear: can predation risk structure ecosystems? BioScience, 54, 755–766.Google Scholar

Robert, A., Colas, B., Guigon, I., et al. (2015). Defining reintroduction success using IUCN criteria for threatened species: a demographic assessment. Animal Conservation, 18, 397–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosell, F., Bozser, O., Collen, P., and Parker, H. (2005). Ecological impact of beavers Castor fiber and Castor canadensis and their ability to modify ecosystems. Mammal Review, 35, 248–276.Google Scholar

Sandom, C., Donlan, C.J., Svenning, J.-C., and Hansen, D. (2013) Rewilding. In MacDonald, D.W. and Willis, K.J. (Eds.), Key topics in conservation biology 2 (pp. 430–451). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Sarrazin, F. (2007). Introductory remarks – a demographic frame for reintroductions. EcoScience, 14, iv–v.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seddon, P.J. (1999). Persistence without intervention: assessing success in wildlife reintroductions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14, 503.Google Scholar

Seddon, P.J., and Armstrong, D.P. (2016). Reintroduction and other conservation translocations: history and future developments. In Jachowski, D.S., Slowtow, R., Angermeier, P.L., and Millspaugh, J.J. (Eds.), Reintroduction of fish and wildlife populations (pp. 7–28). Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Seddon, P.J., Soorae, P.S., and Launay, F. (2005). Taxonomic bias in reintroduction projects. Animal Conservation, 8, 51–58.Google Scholar

Seddon, P.J., Griffiths, C.J., Soorae, P.S., and Armstrong, D.P. (2014). Reversing defaunation: restoring species in a changing world. Science, 345, 406–412.Google Scholar

Selbach, C., Seddon, P.J., and Poulin, R. (2018). Parasites lost: neglecting a crucial element in de-extinction. Trends in Parasitology, 34, 9–11.Google Scholar

Sergio, F., Caro, T., Brown, D., et al. (2008). Top predators as conservation tools: ecological rationale, assumptions, and efficacy. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 39, 1–19.Google Scholar

Shapiro, B. (2015a). Mammoth 2.0: will genome engineering resurrect extinct species? Genome Biology, 16, 228.Google Scholar

Shapiro, B. (2015b). How to clone a mammoth: the science of de-extinction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Shapiro, B. (2017). Pathways to de-extinction: how close can we get to resurrections of an extinct species? Functional Ecology, 31, 996–1002.Google Scholar

Sheridan, D. (2014). Return of beavers would damage salmon, say anglers. www.thetimes.co.uk/article/return-of-beavers-would-damage-salmon-say-anglers-9mn8xmcwdm9Google Scholar

Soorae, P.S. (2008). Global reintroduction perspectives: re-introduction case studies from around the globe. Abu Dhabi, UAE: IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group.Google Scholar

Soorae, P.S. (2010). Global reintroduction perspectives: additional case-studies from around the globe. Abu Dhabi, UAE: IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group.Google Scholar

Soorae, P.S. (2011). Global reintroduction perspectives: more case-studies from around the globe. Abu Dhabi, UAE: IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group and Environment Agency.Google Scholar

Soorae, P.S. (2013). Global re-introduction perspectives: 2013. Case-studies from around the globe. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN/ SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group and Abu Dhabi, UAE: Environment Agency.Google Scholar

Soorae, P.S. (2016). Global re-introduction perspectives: 2016. further case studies from around the globe. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN/ SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group and Abu Dhabi, UAE: Environment Agency.Google Scholar

South, A.S.R., and Macdonald, D. (2000). Simulating the proposed reintroduction of the European beaver (Castor fiber) to Scotland. Biological Conservation, 93, 103–116.Google Scholar

Stewart, F.E.C., Volpe, J.P., Taylor, J.S., et al. (2017). Distinguishing reintroduction from recolonization with genetic testing. Biological Conservation, 214, 242–249.Google Scholar

Stokstad, E. (2015). Bringing back the aurochs. Science, 350, 1144–1147.Google Scholar

Stringer, A.P., and Gaywood, M.J. (2016). The impacts of beavers Castor spp. on biodiversity and the ecological basis for their reintroduction to Scotland, UK. Mammal Review, 46, 270–283.Google Scholar

Svenning, J.-C., Pedersen, P.B.M., Donlan, C.J., et al. (2016). Science for a wilder Anthropocene: synthesis and future directions for trophic rewilding research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 898–906.Google Scholar

Taylor, G., Canessa, S., Armstrong, D.P., Seddon, P.J., and Ewen, J.G. (2017). Is reintroduction biology an effective applied science? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 32, 873–880.Google Scholar

Taylor, S., Castro, I., and Griffiths, R. (2005). Hihi/Stitchbird (Notiomystis cincta) Recovery Plan 2004–09. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Conservation.Google Scholar

The Scottish Beaver Trial Team. (2014). Scottish Beaver Trial: Project Update No. 22 (p. 7). www.scottishbeavers.org.uk/about-the-trial/trial-progress-reports/Google Scholar

van Wieren, S.E. (1995). The potential role of large herbivores in nature conservation and extensive land use in Europe. Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society, 56, 11–23.Google Scholar

White Jr, T.H., Collar, N.J., Moorhouse, R.J., Sanz, V., Stolen, E.D., and Brightsmith, D.J. (2012). Psittacine reintroductions: common denominators of success. Biological Conservation, 148, 106–115.Google Scholar

Williams, C.K., Ericsson, G., and Heberlein, T.A. (2002). A quantitative summary of attitudes toward wolves and their reintroduction. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 30, 575–584.Google Scholar

Wilson, C.J. (2004). Could we live with reintroduced large carnivores in the UK? Mammal Review, 34, 211–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolf, C.M., Garland Jr, T., and Griffith, B. (1998). Predictors of avian and mammalian translocation success: reanalysis with phylogenetically independent contrasts. Biological Conservation, 86, 243–255.Google Scholar

Zimov, S.A., Chuprynin, V.I., Oreshko, A.P., Chapin III, F.S., Reynolds, J.F., and Chapin, M.C. (1995). Steppe–Tundra transition: a herbivore-driven biome shift at the end of the Pleistocene. The American Naturalist, 146, 765–794.Google Scholar

Zimov, S.A., Zimov, N.S., and Chapin III, F.S. (2012). The past and future of the mammoth steppe ecosystem. In Louys, J. (Ed.), Paleontology in ecology and conservation (pp. 193–225). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar