References

AAPOR. 2017. “AAPOR Transparency Certification Agreement.” Oakbrook Terrace, IL: American Association for Public Opinion Research. www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/MainSiteFiles/AAPORTransparencyCertificationAgreement-Revised-October-2017.pdf.Google Scholar

Abbott, Andrew. 2001. Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Abbott, Andrew. 2011. “Library Research Infrastructure for Humanistic and Social Scientific Scholarship in the Twentieth Century.” Pp. 43–88 in Social Knowledge in the Making, edited by Camic, Charles, Gross, Neil and Lamont, Michèle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Abend, Gabriel. 2006. “Styles of Sociological Thought: Sociologies, Epistemologies, and the Mexican and U.S. Quests for Truth.” Sociological Theory 24: 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abreu, Maria, de Groot, Henri L. F. and Florax, Raymond J. G. M.. 2005. “A Meta-Analysis of β-Convergence: The Legendary 2%.” Journal of Economic Surveys 19 (3): 389–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abt, Helmut A. and Garfield, Eugene. 2002. “Is the Relationship between Numbers of References and Paper Lengths the Same for All Sciences?” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53 (13): 1106–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon and Robinson, James A.. 2001. “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation.” American Economic Review 91 (5): 1369–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon and Robinson, James A.. 2002. “Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (4): 1231–1294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

AEA. 2018. “Reports from the American Economics Association Committee on the Status of Women in the Profession.” www.aeaweb.org/content/file?id=6388.Google Scholar

Aiken, Alexander M., Davey, Calum, Hargreaves, James R. and Hayes, Richard J.. 2015. “Re-Analysis of Health and Educational Impacts of a School-Based Deworming Programme in Western Kenya: A Pure Replication.” International Journal of Epidemiology 44 (5): 1572–1580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Akbaritabar, Aliakbar and Squazzoni, Flaminio. 2018. “Gender and Ethnic Patterns of Publication in Top Sociology Journals (Success Stories Only!).” GECS (Research Group in Experimental and Computational Sociology) seminars, January 10, 2018, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.Google Scholar

Alatas, Vivi, Banerjee, Abhijit, Hanna, Rema, Olken, Benjamin A. and Tobias, Julia. 2012. “Targeting the Poor: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia.” American Economic Review 102 (4): 1206–1240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Albouy, David Y. 2012. “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation: Comment.” American Economic Review 102 (6): 3059–3076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ale Ebrahim, Nader, Ebrahimian, Hamed, Mousavi, Maryam and Tahriri, Farzad. 2015. “Does a Long Reference List Guarantee More Citations? Analysis of Malaysian Highly Cited and Review Papers.” International Journal of Management Science and Business 1 (3): 6–15.Google Scholar

Alimohammadi, Dariush and Sajjadi, Mahshid. 2009. “Correlation between References and Citations.” Webology 6 (2): a71.Google Scholar

Allcott, Hunt and Taubinsky, Dmitry. 2015. “Evaluating Behaviorally Motivated Policy: Experimental Evidence from the Lightbulb Market.” American Economic Review 105 (8): 2501–2538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Altbach, Philip G. (ed). 2000. The Changing Academic Workplace: Comparative Perspectives. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College Center for International Higher Education.Google Scholar

Alter, Karen J., Jean Clipperton, Emily Schraudenbach and Laura Rozier. 2018. “Gender and Status in American Political Science: Who Determines Whether a Scholar Is Noteworthy?” SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3235786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

American Political Science Association (APSA). 2012. A Guide to Professional Ethics in Political Science. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar

Amsen, Eva. 2014. “What Is Open Peer Review?” F1000Research, May 21. http://blog.f1000research.com/2014/05/21/what-is-open-peer-review/.Google Scholar

Anderson, Christopher J., Bahník, Štěpán, Barnett-Cowan, Michael, Bosco, Frank A., Chandler, Jesse, Chartier, Christopher R., Cheung, Felix, et al. 2016. “Response to Comment on ‘Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science.’” Science 351 (6277): 1037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Anderson, Melissa S., Martinson, Brian C. and Vries, Raymond De. 2007. “Normative Dissonance in Science: Results from a National Survey of U.S. Scientists.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 2 (4): 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Michael L. 2008. “Multiple Inference and Gender Differences in the Effects of Early Intervention: A Reevaluation of the Abecedarian, Perry Preschool, and Early Training Projects.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 103 (484): 1481–1495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Richard G. and Dewald, William G.. 1994. “Replication and Scientific Standards in Applied Economics a Decade after the Journal of Money, Credit and Banking Project.” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review no. Nov: 79–83.Google Scholar

Anderson, Richard G., Greene, William H., McCullough, Bruce D. and Vinod, Hrishikesh D.. 2008. “The Role of Data/Code Archives in the Future of Economic Research.” Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (1): 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andreoli-Versbach, Patrick and Mueller-Langer, Frank. 2014. “Open Access to Data: An Ideal Professed but Not Practised.” Research Policy. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Angell, Robert. 1936. The Family Encounters the Depression. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar

Angrist, Joshua D. and Pischke, Jörn-Steffen. 2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Angrist, Joshua D. and Pischke, Jörn-Steffen. 2010. “The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design Is Taking the Con out of Econometrics.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 24 (2): 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Angrist, Joshua D. and Pischke, Jörn-Steffen. 2014. Mastering ‘Metrics: The Path from Cause to Effect. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Ankeny, Rachel A. 2011. “Using Cases to Establish Novel Diagnoses: Creating Generic Facts by Making Particular Facts Travel Together.” Pp. 252–272 in S. Morgan and P. Howlett (eds), How Well Do Facts Travel? The Dissemination of Reliable Knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Annas, George J. 2003. “HIPAA Regulations – A New Era of Medical-Record Privacy?” New England Journal of Medicine 348 (15): 1486–1490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Antecol, Heather, Bedard, Kelly and Stearns, Jenna. 2018. “Equal but Inequitable: Who Benefits from Gender-Neutral Tenure Clock Stopping Policies?” American Economic Review 108 (9): 2420–2441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

APA. 2016. “Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct.” Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. www.apa.org/ethics/code/ethics-code-2017.pdf.Google Scholar

APSA. 2012. A Guide to Professional Ethics in Political Science. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar

APSA. 2016. “P- WAM20: Pipeline for Women and Minorities in the 20 Largest Departments – Data for Faculty and Students.” Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar

ASA. 1997. “Code of Ethics of the ASA Committee on Professional Ethics.” Washington, DC: American Sociological Association. www.asanet.org/sites/default/files/code_of_ethics_aug_2017_2_1.pdf.Google Scholar

Ashenfelter, Orley and Greenstone, Michael. 2004. “Estimating the Value of a Statistical Life: The Importance of Omitted Variables and Publication Bias.” Princeton University, Department of Economics, Center for Economic Policy Studies., Working Papers: 105, 2004. http://search.proquest.com/econlit/docview/56626726/1A493319C9B3407FPQ/4?accountid=14496.Google Scholar

Ashenfelter, Orley, Harmon, Colm and Oosterbeek, Hessel. 1999. “A Review of Estimates of the Schooling/Earnings Relationship, with Tests for Publication Bias.” Princeton, Department of Economics – Industrial Relations Sections, Princeton, Department of Economics – Industrial Relations Sections, 1999. http://search.proquest.com/econlit/docview/56307618/5A788ADBA14C479EPQ/2?accountid=14496.Google Scholar

Atchison, Amy L. 2017. “Negating the Gender Citation Advantage in Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 50 (2): 448–455.Google Scholar

Atmanspacher, Harald and Maasen, Sabine (eds). 2016. Reproducibility: Principles, Problems, Practices, and Prospects. New York: John Wiley and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Babcock, Linda, Recalde, Maria P. and Vesterlund, Lise. 2017a. “Gender Differences in the Allocation of Low-Promotability Tasks: The Role of Backlash.” American Economic Review, 107 (5): 131–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Babcock, Linda, Recalde, Maria P., Vesterlund, Lise and Weingart, Laurie. 2017b. “Gender Differences in Accepting and Receiving Requests for Tasks with Low Promotability.” American Economic Review, 107 (3): 714–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Backhouse, Roger E. and Morgan, Mary S.. 2000. “Introduction: Is Data Mining a Methodological Problem?” Journal of Economic Methodology 7 (2): 171–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bai, Liang, Handel, Benjamin, Miguel, Edward and Rao, Gautam. 2015. “Self-Control and Chronic Illness: Evidence from Commitment Contracts for Doctor Visits.” Unpublished manuscript. UC Berkeley.Google Scholar

Baicker, Katherine, Finkelstein, Amy, Song, Jae and Taubman, Sarah. 2014. “The Impact of Medicaid on Labor Market Activity and Program Participation: Evidence from the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment.” American Economic Review 104 (5): 322–328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baicker, Katherine, Taubman, Sarah L., Allen, Heidi L., Bernstein, Mira, Gruber, Jonathan H., Newhouse, Joseph P., Schneider, Eric C., Wright, Bill J., Zaslavsky, Alan M. and Finkelstein, Amy N.. 2013. “The Oregon Experiment – Effects of Medicaid on Clinical Outcomes.” New England Journal of Medicine 368 (18): 1713–1722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bakkensen, Laura A. and Larson, William. 2014. “Population Matters When Modeling Hurricane Fatalities.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111 (50): E5331–E5332.Google ScholarPubMed

Ball, P. 2008. “A Longer Paper Gathers More Citations.” Nature 455 (7211): 274–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bandalos, Deborah L. 2018. Measurement Theory and Applications in the Social Sciences. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Bar-Sinai, Michael, Sweeney, Latanya and Crosas, Merce. 2016. “DataTags, Data Handling Policy Spaces and the Tags Language.” In 2016 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW), 1–8. doi:10.1109/SPW.2016.11.Google Scholar

Bargh, John A., Chen, Mark and Burrows, Lara. 1996. “Automaticity of Social Behavior: Direct Effects of Trait Construct and Stereotype-Activation on Action.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71: 230–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnes, Tiffany D. and Beaulieu, Emily. 2017. “Engaging Women: Addressing the Gender Gap in Women’s Networking and Productivity.” PS: Political Science and Politics 50 (2): 461–466.Google Scholar

Barone, Tom and Elliot, Eisner (eds). 2011. Arts-Based Research. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Bartels, Larry M. 1997. “Specification Uncertainty and Model Averaging.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (2): 641–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barton, Allen. 1979. “Paul Lazarsfeld and Applied Social Research: Invention of the University Applied Social Research Institute.” Social Science History 3 (3): 4–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barton, Judith. 1984. Guide to the Bureau of Applied Social Research. New York: Clearwater Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Basken, Paul. 2018. “UT-Austin Professors Join Campaign Against Faculty-Productivity Company.” Chronicle of Higher Education (January 24).Google Scholar

Bastow, Simon, Dunleavy, Patrick and Tinkler, Jane. 2014. The Impact of the Social Sciences: How Academics and their Research Make a Difference. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Basu, Aparna. 2006. “Using ISI’s ‘Highly Cited Researchers’ to Obtain a Country Level Indicator of Citation Excellence.” Scientometrics 68(3): 361–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bateman, Ian, Kahneman, Daniel, Munro, Alistair, Starmer, Chris and Sugden, Robert. 2005. “Testing Competing Models of Loss Aversion: An Adversarial Collaboration.” Journal of Public Economics, The Experimental Approaches to Public Economics 89 (8): 1561–1580.Google Scholar

Baumeister, Roy F. 2016. “Charting the Future of Social Psychology on Stormy Seas: Winners, Losers, and Recommendations.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 66: 153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumeister, Roy F. and Leary, Mark R.. 1997. “Writing Narrative Literature Reviews.” Review of General Psychology 1 (3): 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumeister, Roy F. and Vohs., Kathleen D. 2016. “Misguided Effort with Elusive Implications.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 11 (4): 574–575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beach, Derek and Pederson, Rasmus Brun. 2013. Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beaman, Lori, Chattopadhyay, Raghabendra, Duflo, Ester, Pande, Rohini and Topalova, Petia. 2008. Powerful Women: Does Exposure Reduce Bias? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beaman, Lori, Duflo, Esther, Pande, Rohini and Topalova, Petia. 2012. “Female Leadership Raises Aspirations and Educational Attainment for Girls: A Policy Experiment in India.” Science 335 (6068): 582–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bear, Julia B. and Collier, Benjamin. 2016. “Where are the Women in Wikipedia? Understanding the Different Psychological Experiences of Men and Women in Wikipedia.” Sex Roles 74 (5–6): 254–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Begg, Colin, Cho, Mildred, Eastwood, Susan Richard Horton, David Moher, Ingram Olkin, Roy Pitkin, Drummond Rennie, Kenneth F. Schulz, David Simel and Donna F. Stroup. 1996. “Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials: The Consort Statement.” Journal of the American Medical Association 276 (8): 637–639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bell, Mark S. and Miller, Nicholas L.. 2015. “Questioning the Effect of Nuclear Weapons on Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 59 (1): 74–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bellavance, François, Dionne, Georges and Lebeau, Martin. 2009. “The Value of a Statistical Life: A Meta-Analysis with a Mixed Effects Regression Model.” Journal of Health Economics 28 (2): 444–464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bellesiles, Michael A. 2000. Arming America: The Origins of a National Gun Culture. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar

Benjamini, Yoav and Hochberg, Yosef. 1995. “Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 57 (1): 289–300.Google Scholar

Benjamini, Yoav, Krieger, Abba M. and Yekutieli, Daniel. 2006. “Adaptive Linear Step-up Procedures That Control the False Discovery Rate.” Biometrika 93 (3): 491–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benjamini, Yoav and Yekutieli, Daniel. 2001. “The Control of the False Discovery Rate in Multiple Testing under Dependency.” The Annals of Statistics 29 (4): 1165–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennet, Andrew. 2010. “Process Tracing and Casual Inference.” In H. E. Brady and D. Collier (eds), Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Bennett, Andrew and Jeffrey, Checkel (eds). 2015. Process Tracing in the Social Sciences: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bennett, Andrew. 2015. “Appendix.” Pp. 276–298 in Bennett, Andrew and Checkel, Jeffrey (eds), Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Berelson, Bernard, Lazarsfeld, Paul and McPhee, William. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Berge, Lars Ivar Oppedal, Bjorvatn, Kjetil, Galle, Simon, Miguel, Edward, Posner, Daniel N., Tungodden, Bertil and Zhang, Kelly. 2015. “How Strong Are Ethnic Preferences?” Working Paper 21715. National Bureau of Economic Research. www.nber.org/papers/w21715.Google Scholar

Berger, James and Berry, Donald. 1988. “Statistical Analysis and the Illusion of Objectivity.” American Scientist (March–April): 159–165.Google Scholar

Berger, Ulrich. 2009. “The Convergence of Fictitious Play in Games with Strategic Complementarities: A Comment.” IDEAS Working Paper Series from RePEc. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/20241/.Google Scholar

Berinsky, Adam J., Druckman, James N. and Yamamoto, Teppei. 2018. “Why Replications Do Not Fix the Reproducibility Crisis: A Model and Evidence from a Large-Scale Vignette Experiment.” Unpublished paper, Department of Political Science, MIT.Google Scholar

Berkenkotter, Carol. 1995. “The Power and the Perils of Peer Review.” Rhetoric Review 13 (2): 245–248.Google Scholar

Bernanke, Ben S. 2004. “Editorial Statement.” American Economic Review 94 (1): 404–404.Google Scholar

Bertrand, Marianne, Kamenica, Emir and Pan, Jessica. 2015. “Gender Identity and Relative Income Within Households.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 130 (2): 571–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bertrand, Marianne and Mullainathan, Sendhil. 2004. “Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination.” American Economic Review 94 (4): 991–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bess, James L. 1998. “Contract Systems, Bureaucracies, and Faculty Motivation: The Probable Effects of a No-Tenure Policy.” Journal of Higher Education 69 (1): 1–22.Google Scholar

Bettinger, Eric P. and Long, Bridget Terry. 2005. “Do Faculty Serve as Role models? The Impact of Instructor Gender on Female Students.” American Economic Review 95 (2): 152–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bettis, Richard A., Helfat, Constance E. and Shaver, J. Myles. 2016. “The Necessity, Logic, and Forms of Replication.” Strategic Management Journal 37 (11): 2193–2203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bhaskar, Roy. 1979. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar

Bhattacharjee, Yudhijit. 2013. “Diederik Stapel’s Audacious Academic Fraud.” New York Times, April 26, 2013, sec. Magazine. www.nytimes.com/2013/04/28/magazine/diederik-stapels-audacious-academic-fraud.html.Google Scholar

Bianchi, Suzanne M., Sayer, Liana C., Milkie, Melissa A. and Robinson, John P.. 2012. “Housework: Who Did, Does or Will Do It, and How Much Does It Matter?” Social Forces 91 (1): 55–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bichsel, Jacqueline and McChesney, Jasper 2017. The Gender Pay Gap and the Representation of Women in Higher Education Administrative Positions: The Century So Far. Research report. CUPA-HR. February. www.cupahr.org/surveys/briefs.aspx.Google Scholar

Bierer, Barbara E., Crosas, Mercè and Pierce, Heather H.. 2017. “Data Authorship as an Incentive to Data Sharing.” New England Journal of Medicine 376 (17): 1684–1687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bishop, Libby. 2005. “Protecting Respondents and Enabling Data Sharing: Reply to Parry and Mauthner.” Sociology 39 (2): 333–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bishop, Libby. 2009. “Ethical Sharing and Reuse of Qualitative Data.” Australian Journal of Social Issues 44 (3): 255–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bishop, Libby. 2014. “Re-Using Qualitative Data: A Little Evidence, on-Going Issues and Modest Reflections.” Studia Socjologiczne 3: 167.Google Scholar

Blackburn, Robert T. and Lawrence, Janet H.. 1995. Faculty at Work: Motivation, Expectation, Satisfaction. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Blackburn, Robert T. and Havighurst, Robert J.. 1979. “Career Patterns of US Male Academic Social Scientists.” Higher Education 8 (5): 553–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bland, J. Martin and Altman, Douglas G.. 1995. “Multiple Significance Tests: The Bonferroni Method.” BMJ: British Medical Journal 310 (6973): 170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Blau, Francine D. and Kahn, Lawrence M.. 2000. “Gender Differences in Pay.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 (4): 75–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blumer, Herbert. 1933. Movies and Conduct. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar

Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Boas, Taylor. 2010. “Varieties of Electioneering: Success Contagion and Presidential Campaigns in Latin America.” World Politics 62 (4): 636–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boas, Taylor. 2015. “Voting for Democracy: Campaign Effects in Chile’s Democratic Transition.” Latin American Politics and Society 57 (2): 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boas, Taylor. 2016. Presidential Campaigns in Latin America: Electoral Strategies and Success Contagion. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bohannon, John. 2016. “About 40% of Economics Experiments Fail Replication Survey.” Science, March. doi:10.1126/science.aaf4141.Google Scholar

Boix, Carles. 2015. Political Order and Inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bontemps, Christophe and Mizon, Grayham E.. 2008. “Encompassing: Concepts and Implementation.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 70 (December): 721–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre, Chamboredon, Jean-Claude and Passeron, Jean-Claude. [1968] 1991. The Craft of Sociology: Epistemological Preliminaries. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borgatti, Stephen P., Everett, Martin G. and Johnson, Jeffrey C.. 2018. Analyzing Social Networks. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Borgman, Christine L. 2009. “The Digital Future Is Now: A Call to Action for the Humanities.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 3 (4). www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/3/4/000077/000077.html.Google Scholar

Borgman, Christine L. 2012. “The Conundrum of Sharing Research Data.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63 (6): 1059–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bornmann, Lutz, Schier, Hermann, Marx, Werner and Daniel, Hans-Dieter. 2012. “What Factors Determine Citation Counts of Publications in Chemistry Besides their Quality?” Journal of Informetrics 6 (1): 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bornmann, Lutz and Daniel, Hans Dieter. 2008. “What Do Citation Counts Measure? A Review of Studies on Citing Behavior.” Journal of Documentation 64 (1): 45–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bornmann, Lutz, Marx, Werner and Haunschild, Robin. 2016. “Calculating Journal Rankings: Peer Review, Bibliometrics, and Alternative Metrics?” Pp. 42–55 in Ciaran Sugre and Serfika Mertkan (eds), Publishing and the Academic World: Passion, Purpose, and Possible Futures. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Borsuk, Robyn M., Budden, Amber E., Leimu, Roosa, Aarssen, Lonnie W. and Lortie, Christopher J.. 2009. “The Influence of Author Gender, National Language and Number of Authors on Citation Rate in Ecology.” Open Ecology Journal 2: 25–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre, Chamboredon, Jean-Claude and Claude-Passeron, Jean. 1991. The Craft of Sociology: Epistemological Preliminaries. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boutron, Isabelle, Moher, David, Altman, Douglas G., Schulz, Kenneth F. and Ravaud, Philippe. 2008. “Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration.” Annals of Internal Medicine 148 (4): 295–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowers, Jake. 2011. “Six Steps to a Better Relationship with Your Future Self.” The Political Methodologist 18 (2): 2–8.Google Scholar

Bowers, Jake, Jonathan Nagler, John Gerring, Alan Jacobs, Don Green and Macartan Humphreys. 2015. “A Proposal for a Political Science Registry.” Available at http://blogs.bu.edu/jgerring/files/2015/09/Aproposal-foraPoliticalScienceRegistry.pdf.Google Scholar

Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Brady, Henry E. and Collier, David. 2008. The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Cunha, Raphael C., Varbanov, Roumen A., Hoh, Yee Shwen, Knisley, Margaret L. and Holmes, Mary Alice. 2015. “Survival Analysis of Faculty Retention and Promotion in the Social Sciences by Gender.” PloS ONE, 10, e0143093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Brady, Henry and Collier, David (eds). 2008. The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brady, Henry E. and David, Collier (eds). 2010. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. 2nd ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Brajer, Victor and Gill, Andrew. 2010. “Yakity-Yak: Who Talks Back? An Email Experiment.” Social Science Quarterly 91 (4): 1007–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brandt, Mark J., IJzerman, Hans, Dijksterhuis, Ap, Farach, Frank J., Geller, Jason, Giner-Sorolla, Roger, Grange, James A., Perugini, Marco, Spies, Jeffrey R. and Veer, Anna van ‘t. 2014. “The Replication Recipe: What Makes for a Convincing Replication?” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 50: 217–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breuer, Peter T. and Bowen, Jonathan P.. 2014. “Empirical Patterns in Google Scholar Citation Counts.” ArXiv:1401.1861 [Cs], April, 398–403. https://doi.org/10.1109/SOSE.2014.55.Google Scholar

Breznau, Nate. 2015. “The Missing Main Effect of Welfare State Regimes: A Replication of ‘Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies’ by Brooks and Manza.” Sociological Science 2: 420–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broad, William and Wade, Nicholas. 1983. Betrayers of the Truth. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Brodeur, Abel, Le, Mathias, Sangnier, Marc and Zylberberg, Yanos. 2016. “Star Wars: The Empirics Strike Back.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 8 (1): 1–32.Google Scholar

Broockman, David, Kalla, Joshua and Aranow, Peter. 2015. “Irregularities in LaCour (2014).” UC Berkeley. http://stanford.edu/~dbroock/broockman_kalla_aronow_lg_irregularities.pdf.Google Scholar

Brooks, Clem. 2014. “Nations, Classes, and the Politics of Professors: A Comparative Perspective.” Pp. 82–108 in Gross, Neil and Simmons, Solon (eds), Professors and Their Politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Brooks, Clem and Manza, Jeff. 2006. “Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies.” American Sociological Review 71 (3): 474–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broom, Alex, Cheshire, Lynda and Emmison, Michael. 2009. “Qualitative Researchers’ Understandings of Their Practice and the Implications for Data Archiving and Sharing.” Sociology 43 (6): 1163–1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Nadia E. 2014. Sisters in the Statehouse: Black Women and Legislative Decision Making. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Robert. 1984. The Nature of Social Laws: Machiavelli to Mill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brzezinski, Michal. 2015. “Power Laws in Citation Distributions: Evidence from Scopus.” Scientometrics 103 (1): 213–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Buckley, William. 1951. God and Man at Yale: The Superstitions of Academic Freedom. Chicago: Regnery.Google Scholar

Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Gleditsch, Nils Petter, James, Patrick, King, Gary, Metelits, Claire, Ray, James Lee, Russett, Bruce, Strand, Havard and Valeriano, Brandon. 2003. “Symposium on Replication in International Studies Research.” International Studies Perspectives 4 (1): 72–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Smith, Alastair, Siverson, Randolph M. and Morrow, James D.. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burlig, Fiona. 2018. “Improving Transparency in Observational Social Science Research: A Pre-Analysis Plan Approach.” Economics Letters 168: 56–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burnside, Craig and Dollar, David. 2000. “Aid, Policies, and Growth.” American Economic Review 90 (4): 847–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burnside, Craig and Dollar, David. 2004. “Aid, Policies, and Growth: Reply.” American Economic Review 94 (3): 781–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bush, Tony. 2016. “Understanding the Peer-Review Process: Reject, Revise, Resubmit.” Pp. 90–98 in Sugre, Ciaran and Mertkan, Serfika (eds), Publishing and the Academic World: Passion, Purpose, and Possible Futures. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Butler, Courtney and Currier, Brett. 2017. “You Can’t Replicate What You Can’t Find: Data Preservation Policies in Economic Journals.” presented at the IASSIST 2017, Lawrence, Kansas, May 25. http://iassist2017.org/program/s107.html.Google Scholar

Callaham, Michael, Wears, Robert L. and Weber, Ellen. 2002. “Journal Prestige, Publication Bias, and Other Characteristics Associated With Citation of Published Studies in Peer-Reviewed Journals.” Journal of the American Medical Association 287 (21): 2847–2850.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Calvert, Melanie, Blazeby, Jane, Altman, Douglas G., Dennis A. Revicki, David Moher and Michael D. Brundage. 2013. “Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Trials: The Consort pro Extension.” Journal of the American Medical Association 309 (8): 814–822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Camerer, Colin F., Dreber, Anna, Forsell, Eskil, Ho, Teck-Hua, Huber, Jürgen, Johannesson, Magnus, Kirchler, Michael et al. 2016. “Evaluating Replicability of Laboratory Experiments in Economics.” Science 351 (6280): 1433–1436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Camfield, Laura and Palmer-Jones, Richard. 2013. “Three ‘Rs’ of Econometrics: Repetition, Reproduction and Replication.” Journal of Development Studies 49 (12): 1607–1614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camic, Charles. 2007. “On Edge: Sociology During the Great Depression and the New Deal.” Pp. 225–280 in Craig Calhoun (ed.), Sociology in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camic, Charles and Gross, Neil. 2001. “The New Sociology of Ideas.” Pp. 236–249 in Judith Blau (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Sociology. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Camic, Charles, Neil, Gross and Michèle, Lamont (eds). 2011. Social Knowledge in the Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camic, Charles, Neil, Gross and Michèle, Lamont 2011. “Introduction: The Study of Social Knowledge Making.” Pp. 1–40 in Camic, Charles, Gross, Neil and Lamont, Michèle (eds), Social Knowledge in the Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, Donald T. 1979. “Assessing the Impact of Planned Social Change.” Evaluation and Program Planning 2 (1): 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, John and Pedersen, Ove. 2014. The National Origins of Policy Ideas: Knowledge Regimes in the United States, France, Germany, and Denmark. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, Marion K., Elbourne, Diana R. and Altman, Douglas G.. 2004. “CONSORT Statement: Extension to Cluster Randomised Trials.” British Medical Journal 328 (7441): 702–708.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Campbell, Marion K., Elbourne, Diana R. and Altman, Douglas G.. 2012. “Consort 2010 Statement: Extension to Cluster Randomised Trials.” British Medical Journal 345: e5661.Google Scholar

Campolieti, Michele, Gunderson, Morley and Riddell, Chris. 2006. “Minimum Wage Impacts from a Prespecified Research Design: Canada 1981–1997.” Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society 45 (2): 195–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Card, David. 1992a. “Do Minimum Wages Reduce Employment? A Case Study of California, 1987–89.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 46 (1): 38–54.Google Scholar

Card, David. 1992b. “Using Regional Variation in Wages to Measure the Effects of the Federal Minimum Wage.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 46 (1): 22–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Card, David and Krueger, Alan B. 1994. “Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast-Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania.” American Economic Review 84 (4): 772–793.Google Scholar

Card, David and Krueger, Alan B. 1995. “Time-Series Minimum-Wage Studies: A Meta-Analysis.” American Economic Review 85 (2): 238–243.Google Scholar

Card, David and Krueger, Alan B. 2000. “Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast-Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania: Reply.” American Economic Review 90 (5): 1397–1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Card, David, Chetty, Raj, Feldstein, Martin and Saez, Emmanuel. 2010. “Expanding Access to Administrative Data for Research in the United States.” 112. NSF SBE 2020. www.nsf.gov/sbe/sbe_2020/2020_pdfs/Card_David_112.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Card, David and DellaVigna, S.. 2014. “Page Limits on Economics Articles: Evidence from Two Journals.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 28 (3): 149–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carey, Benedict. 2011. “Noted Dutch Psychologist, Stapel, Accused of Research Fraud.” New York Times, November 2, sec. Health/Research. www.nytimes.com/2011/11/03/health/research/noted-dutch-psychologist-stapel-accused-of-research-fraud.html.Google Scholar

Carr, Phyllis L., Gunn, Christine M., Kaplan, Samantha A., Raj, Anita and Freund, Karen M. 2015. “Inadequate Progress for Women in Academic Medicine: Findings from the National Faculty Study.” Journal of Women’s Health 24 (3): 190–199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carsey, Thomas M. 2014. “Making DA-RT a Reality.” PS, Political Science and Politics 47 (1): 72–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cartwright, Nancy. 1999. The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casey, Katherine, Glennerster, Rachel and Miguel, Edward. 2012. “Reshaping Institutions: Evidence on Aid Impacts Using a Preanalysis Plan.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 127 (4): 1755–1812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casselman, Ben. 2012. “Economists Set Rules on Ethics.” Wall Street Journal, January 9, sec. Careers. www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970203436904577148940410667970.Google Scholar

Catalini, Christian, Lacetera, Nicola and Oettl, Alexander. 2015. “The Incidence and Role of Negative Citations in Science.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (45): 13823–13826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caverley, Jonathan D. 2009/2010. “The Myth of Military Myopia: Democracy, Small Wars, and Vietnam.” International Security 34 (Winter): 119–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caverley, Jonathan D. 2010/2011. “Explaining U.S. Military Strategy in Vietnam: Thinking Clearly About Causation.” International Security 35 (Winter): 124–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Centeno, Miguel. 2002. Blood and Debt: War and the Nation State in Latin America. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Chalmers, Alan F. 2013. What is This Thing Called Science? New York: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar

Chambers, Christopher. 2013. “Registered Reports: A New Publishing Initative at Cortex.” Cortex 49: 609–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chambers, Christopher, Feredoes, Eva, Muthukumaraswamy, Suresh D. and Etchells, Peter J.. 2014. “Instead of ‘Playing the Game’ It Is Time to Change the Rules: Registered Reports at AIMS Neuroscience and Beyond.” AIMS Environmental Science 1 (1): 4–17.Google Scholar

Chang, Andrew C. and Li, Phillip. 2015. “Is Economics Research Replicable? Sixty Published Papers from Thirteen Journals Say ‘Usually Not.’” Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2015–83. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (US).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chapman, Colin D., Christian Benedict and Helgi B. Schiöth. 2018. “Experimenter Gender and Replicability in Science.” Science Advances 4 (1): 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, Jihui, Kim, Myongjin and Liu, Qihong. 2017. “Gender Gap in Tenure and Promotion: Evidence from the Economics Ph.D. Class of 2008.” Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2880240 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2880240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chenault, Larry A. 1984. “A Note on the Stability Limitations in ‘A Stable Price Adjustment Process.’” Quarterly Journal of Economics 99 (2): 385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chernoff, Fred. 2014. Explanation and Progress in Security Studies: Bridging Theoretical Divides in International Relations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2009. “Opening Remarks.” Pp. 13–43 in Piattelli-Palmarini, Massimo et al. (eds), Of Minds and Language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Choo, Hae Yeon and Ferree., Myra Marx 2010. “Practicing Intersectionality in Sociological Research: A Critical Analysis of Inclusions, Interactions, and Institutions in the Study of Inequalities.” Sociological Theory 28 (2): 129–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christensen, Björn and Christensen, Sören. 2014. “Are Female Hurricanes Really Deadlier than Male Hurricanes?” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (34): E3497–E3498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Christensen, Darin, Hartman, Alexandra and Samii, Cyrus. 2018. “Property Rights, Investment, and Land Grabs: An Institutional Natural Experiment in Liberia.” Unpublished working paper. Available online at https://darinchristensen.com/publication/liberia-tenure/.Google Scholar

Christensen, Garret and Miguel, Edward. 2018. “Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research.” Journal of Economic Literature 56 (3): 920–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ciccone, Antonio. 2011. “Economic Shocks and Civil Conflict: A Comment.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 3 (4): 215–227.Google Scholar

Clemens, Michael. 2017. “The Meaning of Failed Replications: A Review and Proposal.” Journal of Economic Surveys 31(February): 326–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clements, Kenneth W. and Wang, Patricia. 2003. “Who Cites What?” Economic Record 79 (245): 229–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coffman, Lucas C. and Niederle, Muriel. 2015. “Pre-Analysis Plans have Limited Upside, Especially Where Replications are Feasible.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (3): 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Jacob. 1994. “The Earth is Round (p < .05).” American Psychologist 49: 997–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen-Cole, Ethan, Durlauf, Steven, Fagan, Jeffrey and Nagin, Daniel. 2009. “Model Uncertainty and the Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment.” American Law and Economics Review 11 (2): 335–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cole, Stephen. 1994. “Why Sociology Doesn’t Make Progress like the Natural Sciences.” Sociological Forum 9: 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coleman, James. 1958. Nigeria: Background to Nationalism. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coleman, James, Katz, Elihu and Menzel, Herbert. 1966. Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Colgan, Jeff. 2017. “Gender Bias in International Relations Graduate Education? New Evidence from Syllabi.” PS: Political Science and Politics 50 (2): 456–460.Google Scholar

Colgrove, James. 2006. “The Ethics and Politics of Compulsory HPV Vaccination.” The New England Journal of Medicine 355: 2389–2391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Collier, David. 2011. “Understanding Process Tracing.” PS:Political Science and Politics 44 (4): 823–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collier, David, Brady, Henry and Seawright, Jason. 2004. “Sources of Leverage in Causal Inference: Toward an Alternative View of Methodology.” Pp. 229–266 in Brady, Henry and Collier, David (eds), Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Collier, David and Mahon, James E., Jr. 1993. “Conceptual ‘Stretching’ Revisited: Adapting Categories in Comparative Analysis.” American Political Science Review 87 (4): 845–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collier, Ruth Berins and Mahoney, James. 1997. “Adding Collective Actors to Collective Outcomes: Labor and Recent Democratization in South America and Southern Europe.” Comparative Politics 29 (3): 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, Harry M. 1985. Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Collins, Harry M. 1991. “The Meaning of Replication and the Science of Economics.” History of Political Economy 23: 123–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, Harry M. 1998. “The Meaning of Data: Open and Closed Evidential Cultures in the Search for Gravitational Waves.” American Journal of Sociology 104 (2): 293–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, Randall. 1994. “Why the Social Sciences Won’t Become High-Consensus, Rapid-Discovery Science.” Sociological Forum 9 (2): 155–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, Randall. 1998. The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Conover, Pamela Johnston. 1988. “The Role of Social Groups in Political Thinking.” British Journal of Political Science 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Converse, Jean. 1987. Survey Research in the United States: Roots and Emergence 1890–1960. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Coppedge, Michael. 2012. Democratization and Research Methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coppedge, Michael, Gerring, John, Altman, David, Bernhard, Michael, Fish, Steven, Hicken, Allen, Kroenig, Matthew, Lindberg, Staffan I., McMann, Kelly, Paxton, Pamela, Semetko, Holli A., Skaaning, Svend-Erik, Staton, Jeffrey and Teorell, Jan. 2011. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: A New Approach.” Perspectives on Politics 9 (2, June): 247–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corbyn, Zoe. 2008. “Unpaid Peer Review is worth £1.9bn.” Times Higher Education, May 29.Google Scholar

“Correspondence: David H. Autor and Bruno S. Frey.” 2011. Journal of Economic Perspectives 25 (3): 239–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corti, Louise and Gregory, Arofan. 2011. “CAQDAS Comparability. What About CAQDAS Data Exchange?” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 12 (1). www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1634.Google Scholar

Corti, Louise, Eynden, Veerle van den, Bishop, Libby and Woollard, Matthew. 2014. Managing and Sharing Research Data: A Guide to Good Practice. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar

Costas, Rodrigo, Zahedi, Zohreh and Wouters, Paul. 2014. “How Well Developed are Altmetrics? A Cross-Disciplinary Analysis of the Presence of ‘Alternative Metrics’ in Scientific Publications.” Scientometrics 101 (2): 1491–1513.Google Scholar

Costas, Rodrigo, Zahedi, Zohreh and Wouters, Paul. 2015. “Do ‘Altmetrics’ Correlate with Citations? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66: 2003–2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cowen, Tyler and Tabarrok, Alex. 2016. “A Skeptical View of the National Science Foundation’s Role in Economic Research.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 30 (3): 235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Richard. 1961. The Algebra of Probable Inference. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1989. “Demarginalizing The Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Antiracist Politics.” University of Chicago Legal Forces, 139–168Google Scholar

Cronin, Blaise. 1984. The Citation Process. The Role and Significance of Citations in Scientific Communication. London: Taylor Graham.Google Scholar

Cronin, Blaise and Sugimoto, Cassidy R. (eds). 2014. Beyond Bibliometrics: Harnessing Multidimensional Indicators of Scholarly Impact. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cumming, Geoff. 2008. “Replication and p Intervals: P Values Predict the Future Only Vaguely, but Confidence Intervals Do Much Better.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 3: 286–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cumming, Geoff and Maillardet, Robert. 2006. “Confidence Intervals and Replication: Where Will the Next Mean Fall?” Psychological Methods 11: 217–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cumming, Geoff, Williams, Jennifer and , Fiona Fidler. 2004. “Replication, and Researchers’ Understanding of Confidence Intervals and Standard Error Bars.” Understanding Statistics 3: 299–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahl Rasmussen, Ole, Malchow-Møller, Nikolaj and Andersen, Thomas Barnebeck. 2011. “Walking the Talk: The Need for a Trial Registry for Development Interventions.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 3 (4): 502–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dal-Ré, Rafael, Ioannidis, John P., Bracken, Michael B., Buffler, Patricia A., Chan, An-Wen, Franco, Eduardo L., Vecchia, Carlo La and Weiderpass, Elisabete. 2014. “Making Prospective Registration of Observational Research a Reality.” Science Translational Medicine 6 (224): 224cm1–224cm1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

David, Paul A. 1985. “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY.” American Economic Review 75 (2): 332–337.Google Scholar

Davis, Graham A. 2013. “Replicating Sachs and Warner’s Working Papers on the Resource Curse.” Journal of Development Studies 49 (12): 1615–1630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, James. 1958. “Review of Robert Merton et al, The Student-Physician,” American Journal of Sociology 63 (4): 445–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Angelis, Catherine, Drazen, Jeffrey M., Frizelle, Frank A., Haug, Charlotte, Hoey, John, Horton, Richard, Kotzin, Sheldon et al. 2004. “Clinical Trial Registration: A Statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.” New England Journal of Medicine 351 (12): 1250–1251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Deaton, Angus. 2010. “Instruments, Randomization, and Learning about Development.” Journal of Economic Literature 48 (2): 424–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeCoursey, Tom. 2006. “Perspective: The Pros and Cons of Open Peer Review.” Nature. www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature04991.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deere, Donald, Murphy, Kevin M. and Welch, Finis. 1995. “Employment and the 1990–1991 Minimum-Wage Hike.” American Economic Review 85 (2): 232–237.Google Scholar

Dekel, Eddie, Levine, David, Meghir, Costas, Newey, Whitney and Postlewaite, Andrew. 2006. “Report of the Editors.” Econometrica 74 (1): 307–310.Google Scholar

Delgado López-Cózar, Emilio, Robinson-García, Nicolas and Torres-Salinas, Daniel. 2014. “The Google Scholar Experiment: How to Index False Papers and Manipulate Bibliometric Indicators.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65 (3): 446–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Della Porta, Donatella and Keating, Michael (eds). 2008. Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DellaVigna, Stefano and Pope, Devin. 2016. “Predicting Experimental Results: Who Knows What?” Working Paper 22566. National Bureau of Economic Research. www.nber.org/papers/w22566.Google Scholar

DeLong, J. Bradford and Lang, Kevin. 1992. “Are All Economic Hypotheses False?” Journal of Political Economy 100 (6): 1257–1272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Denton, Frank T. 1985. “Data Mining as an Industry.” Review of Economics and Statistics 67 (1): 124–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeRigne, LeaAnne and Porterfield, Shirley L.. 2017. “Employment Change Among Married Parents of Children With Special Health Care Needs.” Journal of Family Issues 38 (5): 579–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Desch, Michael C. 2008. Power and Military Effectiveness: The Fallacy of Democratic Triumphalism. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Dessler, David. 1991. “Beyond Correlations: Toward a Causal Theory of War.” International Studies Quarterly 35 (3): 337–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dewald, William G., Thursby, Jerry G and Anderson, Richard G.. 1986. “Replication in Empirical Economics: The Journal of Money, Credit and Banking Project.” American Economic Review 76 (4): 587–603.Google Scholar

Dezhbakhsh, Hashem, Rubin, Paul H. and Shepherd, Joanna M. 2003. “Does Capital Punishment Have a Deterrent Effect? New Evidence from Postmoratorium Panel Data.” American Law and Economics Review 5 (2): 344–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diament, Sean M., Howat, Adam J and Lacombe, Matthew J.. 2018. “Gender Representation in the American Politics Canon: An Analysis of Core Graduate Syllabi.” PS: Political Science and Politics: 1–6.Google Scholar

Didegah, Fereshteh and Thelwall, Mike. 2013. “Determinants of Research Citation Impact in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 (5): 1055–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dijksterhuis, Ap 2013. “Replication Crisis or Crisis in Replication A Reinterpretation of Shanks et al.” Reader comment. www.plosone.org/annotation/listThread.action?root=64751.Google Scholar

Dijksterhuis, Ap, Spears, Russell and Lepinasse, Vincent. 2001. “Reflecting and Deflecting Stereotypes: Assimilation and Contrast in Impression Formation and Automatic Behavior.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 37: 286–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DiMaggio, Paul J. and Walter W., Powell (eds). 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Dimitrova, Daniela V. and Bugeja, Michael. 2007. “The Half-Life of Internet References Cited in Communication Journals.” New Media and Society 9 (5): 811–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Djupe, Paul, Smith, Amy Erica and Sokhey, Anand, 2018. “Explaining Gender in the Journals: How Submission Practices Affect Publication Patterns in Political Science.” Paper presented at the Visions in Methodology Conference, Ohio State University, May 7–9.Google Scholar

Dollard, John. 1937. Caste and Class in a Southern Town. New edition. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar

Donohue, John J. and Levitt, Steven D.. 2001. “The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (2): 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donohue, John J. and Levitt, Steven D.. 2008. “Measurement Error, Legalized Abortion, and the Decline in Crime: A Response to Foote and Goetz (Christopher L, Foote, Christopher F. Goetz) (Report).” Quarterly Journal of Economics 123 (1): 425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donohue, John J. and Wolfers, Justin. 2005. “Uses and Abuses of Empirical Evidence in the Death Penalty Debate.” Stanford Law Review 58 (3): 791–845.Google Scholar

DORA. 2012. “San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment.” 2012. https://sfdora.org/read/.Google Scholar

Doucet, Andrea and Mauthner, Natasha S.. 2008. “What Can Be Known and How? Narrated Subjects and the Listening Guide.” Qualitative Research 8 (3): 399–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doucouliagos, Chris. 2005. “Publication Bias in the Economic Freedom and Economic Growth Literature.” Journal of Economic Surveys 19 (3): 367–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doucouliagos, Chris and Stanley, T. D.. 2013. “Are All Economic Facts Greatly Exaggerated? Theory Competition and Selectivity.” Journal of Economic Surveys 27 (2): 316–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doucouliagos, Chris, Stanley, T. D. and Giles, Margaret. 2012. “Are Estimates of the Value of a Statistical Life Exaggerated?” Journal of Health Economics 31 (1): 197–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Doucouliagos, Christos and Laroche, Patrice. 2003. “What Do Unions Do to Productivity? A Meta-Analysis.” Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society 42 (4): 650–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doucouliagos, Hristos, Ioannidis, John P. and Stanley, Tom. 2017. “The Power of Bias in Economics.” Economic Journal 127 (October): F236–F265.Google Scholar

Doucouliagos, Hristos and Stanley, T. D.. 2009. “Publication Selection Bias in Minimum-Wage Research? A Meta-Regression Analysis.” British Journal of Industrial Relations 47 (2): 406–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doucouliagos, Hristos, Stanley, T. D. and Kip Viscusi, W.. 2014. “Publication Selection and the Income Elasticity of the Value of a Statistical Life.” Journal of Health Economics 33 (January): 67–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Douven, Igor. 2011. “Abduction” and “Supplement to Abduction: Peirce on Abduction,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2011 Edition), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/abduction/.Google Scholar

Drazen, Jeffrey M. 2016. “Data Sharing and the Journal.” New England Journal of Medicine 374 (19): e24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dreber, Anna, Pfeiffer, Thomas, Almenberg, Johan, Isaksson, Siri, Wilson, Brad, Chen, Yiling, Nosek, Brian A. and Johannesson, Magnus. 2015. “Using Prediction Markets to Estimate the Reproducibility of Scientific Research.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, November, 201516179. doi:10.1073/pnas.1516179112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Druckman, James N. and Green, Donald P (eds). 2011. Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Druckman, James N., Green, Donald P., Kuklinski, James H. and Lupia, Arthur. 2006. “The Growth and Development of Experimental Research in Political Science.” American Political Science Review 100 (4): 627–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drukker, David M. and Wiggins, Vince. 2004. “Verifying the Solution from a Nonlinear Solver: A Case Study: Comment.” American Economic Review 94 (1): 397–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Du Bois, W. E. B. 1937. “Southern Trauma: Review of Caste and Class in a Southern Town by John Dollard.” North Georgia Review 2: 9–10.Google Scholar

Duarte, José et al. 2015. “Political Diversity Will Improve Psychological Science.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1–58.Google ScholarPubMed

Dube, Arindrajit, William Lester, T. and Reich, Michael. 2010. “Minimum Wage Effects Across State Borders: Estimates Using Contiguous Counties.” Review of Economics and Statistics 92 (4): 945–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duflo, Esther, Glennerster, Rachel and Kremer, Michael. 2007. “Chapter 61 Using Randomization in Development Economics Research: A Toolkit.” Pp. 3895–3962 in Paul Schultz, T. and Strauss, John A. (eds), Handbook of Development Economics. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Dumont, Clayton W. 2008. The Promise of Poststructuralist Sociology: Marginalized Peoples and the Problem of Knowledge. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Dunleavy, Patrick. 2014. “Poor Citation Practices are a Form of Academic Self-Harm in the Humanities and Social Sciences.” Blog post. https://medium.com/advice-and-help-in-authoring-a-phd-or-non-fiction/poor-citation-practices-are-a-form-of-academic-self-harm-in-the-humanities-and-social-sciences-2cddf250b3c2#.6vnf69w17.Google Scholar

Dunning, Thad. 2012. Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-Based Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunning, Thad. 2016. “Transparency, Replication, and Cumulative Learning: What Experiments Alone Cannot Achieve.” Annual Review of Political Science 19: 541–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duvendack, Maren and Palmer-Jones, Richard. 2013. “Replication of Quantitative Work in Development Studies: Experiences and Suggestions.” Progress in Development Studies 13 (4): 307–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duvendack, Maren, Palmer-Jones, Richard and Reed, Robert W. 2015. “Replications in Economics: A Progress Report.” Economic Journal Watch 12 (2): 164–191.Google Scholar

Dwork, Cynthia and Smith, Adam. 2010. “Differential Privacy for Statistics: What We Know and What We Want to Learn.” Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality 1 (2). http://repository.cmu.edu/jpc/vol1/iss2/2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Easley, Richard W., Madden, Charles S. and Dunn, Mark G. 2000. “Conducting Marketing Science: The Role of Replication in the Research Process.” Journal of Business Research 48 (1): 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Easterbrook, Phillipa J., Gopalan, Ramana, Berlin, Jesse A. and Matthews, David R.. 1991. “Publication Bias in Clinical Research.” The Lancet, originally published as 337 (8746): 867–872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Easterly, William, Levine, Ross and Roodman, David. 2004. “Aid, Policies, and Growth: Comment.” American Economic Review 94 (3): 774–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eble, Alex, Boone, Peter and Elbourne, Diana. 2014. “On Minimizing the Risk of Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials in Economics.” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2272141. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2272141.Google Scholar

Eden, Dov. 2002. “From the Editors: Replication, Meta-Analysis, Scientific Progress, and AMJ’s Publication Policy.” Academy of Management Journal 45: 841–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Egger, Matthias, Davey-Smith, George and Altman, Douglas G (eds). 2001. Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context. London: BMJ Publishing Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eich, Eric. 2014. “Business Not as Usual.” Psychological Science 25 (1): 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613512465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eidlin, Fred. 1983. “Area Studies and/or Social Science: Contextually-Limited Generalizations versus General Laws.” Pp. 199–216 in Eidlin, Fred (ed.), Constitutional Democracy: Essays in Comparative Politics. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar

Elkana, Yehuda, Lederberg, Joshua, Merton, Robert K., Thackray, Arnold and Zuckerman, Harriet. 1978. Towards a Metric of Science: The Advent of Science Indicators. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Ellison, Glenn. 2002. “The Slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process.” Journal of Political Economy 110 (5): 947–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elm, Erik von, Altman, Douglas G., Egger, Matthias, Pocock, Stuart J., Gøtzsche, Peter C. and Vandenbroucke, Jan P.. 2007. “The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies.” Preventive Medicine 45 (4): 247–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elman, Colin and Kapiszewski, Diana. 2014. “Data Access and Research Transparency in the Qualitative Tradition.” PS: Political Science and Politics 47 (1): 43–47.Google Scholar

Ember, Carol and Hanisch, Robert. 2013. “Sustaining Domain Repositories for Digital Data: A White Paper, December 11.” doi:10.3886/SustainingDomainRepositoriesDigitalData.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Enders, Walter and Hoover, Gary A.. 2004. “Whose Line Is It? Plagiarism in Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature 42 (2): 487–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Enders, Walter and Hoover, Gary A.. 2006. “Plagiarism in the Economics Profession: A Survey.” Challenge 49 (5): 92–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epidemiology. 2010. “The Registration of Observational Studies – When Metaphors Go Bad.” Epidemiology, July, 1. doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181eafbcf.Google Scholar

Erikson, Martin G. and Erlandson, Peter. 2014. “A Taxonomy of Motives to Cite.” Social Studies of Science 44 (4): 625–637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ertman, Thomas. 1997. Birth of the Leviathan: Building States and Regimes in Medieval and Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Espeland, Wendy Nelson and Sauder, Michael. 2016. Engines of Anxiety: Academic Rankings, Reputation, and Accountability. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Etz, Alexander and Vandekerckhove, Joachim. 2016. “A Bayesian Perspective on the Reproducibility Project: Psychology.” PLoS ONE 11 (2): e0149794.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Evangelou, Evangelos, Trikalinos, Thomas A. and Ioannidis, John P.. 2005. “Unavailability of Online Supplementary Scientific Information from Articles Published in Major Journals.” The FASEB Journal 19 (14): 1943–1944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Everett, Jim A. C. and Earp, Brian D.. 2016. “A Tragedy of the (Academic) Commons: Interpreting the Replication Crises in Psychology as a Social Dilemma for Early-Career Researchers.” Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1152.Google Scholar

Fairfield, Tasha. 2010. “Business Power and Tax Reform: Taxing Income and Profits in Chile and Argentina.” Latin American Politics and Society 52 (2): 37–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fairfield, Tasha. 2011. “Business Power and Protest: Argentina’s Agricultural Producers Protest in Comparative Context.” Studies in Comparative International Development 46 (4): 424–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fairfield, Tasha. 2013. “Going Where the Money Is: Strategies for Taxing Economic Elites in Unequal Democracies.” World Development 47: 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fairfield, Tasha. 2015. Private Wealth and Public Revenue in Latin America: Business Power and Tax Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fairfield, Tasha and Charman, Andrew. 2015. “Bayesian Probability: The Logic of (Political) Science: Opportunities, Caveats and Guidelines.” Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 3–6, San Francisco.Google Scholar

Fairfield, Tasha and Charman, Andrew. 2017. “Explicit Bayesian Analysis for Process Tracing: Guidelines, Opportunities, and Caveats.” Political Analysis 25 (3): 363–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fairfield, Tasha and Charman, Andrew. 2018. “A Bayesian Perspective on Case Selection.” Presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Boston, MA, August 30–September 2.Google Scholar

Fairfield, Tasha and Charman, Andrew. 2019. “The Bayesian Foundations of Iterative Research in Qualitative Social Science: A Dialogue with the Data.” Perspectives on Politics 17 (1): 154–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fairfield, Tasha and Charman, Andrew. 2020. Social Inquiry and Bayesian Inference: Rethinking Qualitative Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fairfield, Tasha and Garay, Candelaria. 2017. “Redistribution under the Right in Latin America: Electoral Competition and Organized Actors in Policymaking,” Comparative Political Studies 50 (14): 1871–1906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falagas, Matthew E., Zarkali, Angeliki, Karageorgopoulos, Drosos E., Bardakas, Vangelis and Mavros, Michael N.. 2013. “The Impact of Article Length on the Number of Future Citations: A Bibliometric Analysis of General Medicine Journals.” PLoS ONE 8 (2): e49476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fanelli, Daniele. 2009. “How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data.” PLoS ONE 4 (5): e5738.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fanelli, Daniele. 2013. “Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign.” PLoS Medicine 10 (12): e1001563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fang, Ferric C. and Casadevall, Arturo. 2011. “Retracted Science and the Retraction Index.” Infection and Immunity 79 (10): 3855–3859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fann, Kuang Tih. 1970. Peirce’s Theory of Abduction. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Faye, Cathy. 2012. “American Social Psychology: Examining the Contours of the 1970s Crisis.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (2): 514–521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Feak, Christine B. and Swales, John M.. 2009. Telling a Research Story: Writing a Literature Review. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feigenbaum, Susan and Levy, David M.. 1993. “The Market for (Ir)reproducible Econometrics.” Social Epistemology 7: 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldstein, Martin. 1974. “Social Security, Induced Retirement, and Aggregate Capital Accumulation.” Journal of Political Economy 82 (5): 905–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldstein, Martin. “Social Security and Private Saving: Reply.” Journal of Political Economy 90 (3): 630–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferber, Marianne A. and Brün, Michael. 2011. “The Gender Gap in Citations: Does It Persist?” Feminist Economics 17 (1): 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferree, Myra Marx, Khan, Shamus and Morimoto, Shauna. 2007. “Assessing the Feminist Revolution: The Presence and Absence of Gender in Theory and Practice.” Pp. 438–479 in Craig Calhoun (ed.), Sociology in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feyerabend, Paul. 1993. Against Method. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Fielding, Nigel. 2004. “Getting the Most from Archived Qualitative Data: Epistemological, Practical and Professional Obstacles.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 7 (1): 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fienberg, Stephen E., Martin, Margaret E. and Straf, Miron L. (eds). 1985. Sharing Research Data. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar

Findley, Michael G., Jensen, Nathan M., Malesky, Edmund J and Pepinsky, Thomas B.. 2016. “Can Results-Free Review Reduce Publication Bias? The Results and Implications of a Pilot Study.” Comparative Political Studies 49 (13): 1667–1703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fink, Günther, McConnell, Margaret and Vollmer, Sebastian. 2014. “Testing for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Experimental Data: False Discovery Risks and Correction Procedures.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 6 (1): 44–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finkel, Eli, J., Eastwick, Paul W. and Reis, Harry T.. 2015. “Best Research Practices in Psychology: Illustrating Epistemological and Pragmatic Considerations with the Case of Relationship Science.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 108 (2): 275–297.Google Scholar

Finkelstein, Amy, Taubman, Sarah, Wright, Bill, Bernstein, Mira, Gruber, Jonathan, Newhouse, Joseph P., Allen, Heidi and Baicker, Katherine. 2012. “The Oregon Health Insurance Experiment: Evidence from the First Year.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 127 (3): 1057–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finney, David. 1997. “The Responsible Referee.” Biometrics 53 (2): 715–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleischmann, Martin and Pons, Stanley. 1989. “Electrochemically Induced Nuclear Fusion of Deuterium.” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry and Interfacial Electrochemistry 261 (2): 301–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Folbre, Nancy 1982. “Exploitation Comes Home: A Critique of the Marxian Theory of Family Labor.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 6 (4): 317–329.Google Scholar

Food and Drug Administration. 1998. “Guidance for Industry: E9 Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials.” www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidanecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm073137.pdf.Google Scholar

Food and Drug Administration. n.d. “E9 Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials.” Guidance for Industry. Rockville, MD: Food and Drug Administration. www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm073137.pdf.Google Scholar

Foote, Christopher L. and Goetz, Christopher F.. 2008. “The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime: Comment (Report).” Quarterly Journal of Economics 123 (1): 407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forscher, Bernard. 1965. “Rules for Referees.” Science 150 (3694): 319–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fourcade-Gourinchas, Marion and Babb, Sarah. 2002. “The Rebirth of the Liberal Creed: Paths to Neoliberalism in Four Countries.” American Journal of Sociology 108: 533–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fourcade, Marion. 2009. Economists and societies: Discipline and profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fourcade, Marion and Healy, Kieran. 2016. “Seeing Like a Market.” Socio-Economic Review (December): 9–29.Google Scholar

Fourcade, Marion and Healy, Kieran. 2017. “Categories All the Way Down.” Historical Social Research 42 (1): 286–296.Google Scholar

Fowler, Linda L. 1995. “Replication as Regulation.” PS: Political Science and Politics 28 (3): 478–481.Google Scholar

Fox, Charles W., Timothy Paine, C. E. and Sauterey, Boris. 2016. “Citations Increase with Manuscript Length, Author Number, and References Cited in Ecology Journals.” Ecology and Evolution 6 (21): 7717–7726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Franco, Annie, Malhotra, Neil and Simonovits, Gabor. 2014. “Publication Bias in the Social Sciences: Unlocking the File Drawer.” Science 345 (6203): 1502–1505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Frank, Michael C. and Saxe, Rebecca. 2012. “Teaching Replication.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 7 (6): 600–604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Freese, Jeremy. 2007a. “Overcoming Objections to Open-Source Social Science.” Sociological Methods and Research 36 (2): 220–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freese, Jeremy. 2007b. “Replication Standards for Quantitative Social Science: Why Not Sociology?” Sociological Methods and Research 36 (2): 153–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freese, Jeremy and Peterson, David. 2016. “The Emergence of Forensic Objectivity.” osf.io/2ft8x.Google Scholar

Freese, Jeremy and Peterson, David. 2017. “Replication in Social Science.” Annual Review of Sociology 43 (1): 147–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freese, Jeremy and Peterson, David. 2018. “The Emergence of Statistical Objectivity.” Sociological Theory 36 (3): 289–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freese, Jeremy and Powell, Brian. 2001. “Commentary and Debate: Making Love Out of Nothing at All? Null Findings and the Trivers-Willard Hypothesis.” American Journal of Sociology 106 (6): 1776–1788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frey, René L., Frey, Bruno S and Eichenberger, Reiner. 1999. “A Case of Plagiarism.” Kyklos 52 (3): 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frickel, Scott. 2008. “On Missing New Orleans: Lost Knowledge and Knowledge Gaps in an Urban Hazardscape.” Environmental History 13: 643–650.Google Scholar

Frickel, Scott and Gross, Neil. 2005. “A General Theory of Scientific/Intellectual Movements.” American Sociological Review 70 (2): 204–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fried, Eiko. 2018. “7 Sternberg Papers: 351 References, 161 Self-Citations.” March 29, 2018. http://eiko-fried.com/sternberg-selfcitations/.Google Scholar

Frijters, Paul and Torgler, Benno. 2016. “Improving the Peer Review Process: A Proposed Market System.” Discussion paper No. 9894, IZA/The Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, Germany.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuess, Scott M., Jr. 1996. “On Replication in Business and Economics Research: The QJBE Case.” Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics 35 (2): 3–13.Google Scholar

Gaddis, John Lewis. 1989. The Long Peace: Inquiries into the History of the Cold War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Galbraith, Rex F. 1988. “A Note on Graphical Presentation of Estimated Odds Ratios from Several Clinical Trials.” Statistics in Medicine 7 (8): 889–894.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Galvan, Jose L. and Galvan, Melisa C.. 2017. Writing Literature Reviews: A guide for Students of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ganimian, Alejandro. 2014. “Pre-Analysis Plan Template.” Template document. Harvard University. http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/alejandro_ganimian/files/pre-analysis_plan_template_0.pdf.Google Scholar

Gans, Herbert J. 1992. “Sociological Amnesia: The Noncumulation of Normal Social Science.” Sociological Forum 7: 701–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gans, Joshua. 2017. Scholarly Publishing and its Discontents: An Economist’s Perspective on Dealing with Market Power and its Consequences. Toronto: Core Economic Research.Google Scholar

Garay, Candelaria. 2016. Social Policy Expansion in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

García, Fernando Martel. 2016. “Replication and the Manufacture of Scientific Inferences: A Formal Approach.” International Studies Perspectives 17 (4): 408–425.Google Scholar

Garfield, E. 1955. “Citation Indexes for Science: A New Dimension in Documentation through Association of Ideas.” Science 122 (3159): 108–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gazni, Ali and Didegah, Fereshteh. 2011. “Investigating Different Types of Research Collaboration and Citation Impact: A Case Study of Harvard University’s Publications.” Scientometrics 87 (2): 251–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gehlbach, Scott. 2015. “The Fallacy of Multiple Methods.” Comparative Politics Newsletter 25 (2): 11–12.Google Scholar

Geller, Daniel S. and John A., Vasquez (eds). 2005. The Construction and Cumulation of Knowledge in International Relations. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Gelman, Andrew and Gross, Neil. 2015. “Political Attitudes in Social Environments.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 38: E114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gelman, Andrew and Loken, Eric. 2013. “The Garden of Forking Paths: Why Multiple Comparisons Can Be a Problem, Even When There is No ‘Fishing Expedition’ or ‘p-Hacking’ and the Research Hypothesis Was Posited ahead of Time.” November. www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/unpublished/p_hacking.pdf.Google Scholar

Gelman, Andrew and Loken, Eric. 2014. “The Statistical Crisis in Science: Data-dependent Analysis – A “Garden of Forking Paths” – Explains Why Many Statistically Significant Comparisons Don’t Hold Up.” American Scientist 102 (6): 460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gelman, Andrew, Pasarica, Cristian and Dodhia, Rahul. 2002. “Let’s Practice What We Preach.” The American Statistician 56 (2): 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gelman, Andrew and Stern, Hal. 2006. “The Difference between “Significant” and “Not Significant” is Not Itself Statistically Significant.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 60: 328–331.Google Scholar

George, Alexander L. and Bennett, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Gerber, Alan S. and Malhotra, Neil. 2008a. “Do Statistical Reporting Standards Affect What is Published? Publication Bias in Two Leading Political Science Journals.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 3: 313–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerber, Alan S. and Malhotra, Neil. 2008b. “Publication Bias in Empirical Sociological Research: Do Arbitrary Significance Levels Distort Published Results?” Sociological Methods and Research 37 (1): 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerber, Alan S., Green, Donald P. and Nickerson, David. 2001. “Testing for Publication Bias in Political Science.” Political Analysis 9 (4): 385–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerber, Alan S., Malhotra, Neil, Dowling, Conor and Doherty, David. 2010. “Publication Bias in Two Political Behavior Literatures.” American Politics Research 38 (4): 591–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerber, Alan, Arceneaux, Kevin, Boudreau, Cheryl, Dowling, Conor, Hillygus, Sunshine, Palfrey, Thomas, Biggers, Daniel R. and Hendry, David J. 2014. “Reporting Guidelines for Experimental Research: A Report from the Experimental Research Section Standards Committee.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 1 (1): 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerking, Shelby and Morgan, William E. 2007. “Effects of Environmental and Land Use Regulation in the Oil and Gas Industry Using the Wyoming Checkerboard as a Natural Experiment: Retraction.” American Economic Review 97 (3): 1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerring, John. 2012a. “Mere Description.” British Journal of Political Science 42 (04): 721–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerring, John. 2012b. Social Science Methodology: A Unified Framework. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gerring, John. 2017. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. 2d ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gerring, John and Cojocaru, Lee. 2016. “Arbitrary Limits to Scholarly Speech: Why (Short) Word Limits Should be Abolished.” Qualitative and Multi-Method Research: Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Organized Section on Qualitative and Multi-Method Research 14: 1/2 (Spring/Fall): 2–13.Google Scholar

Gertler, Aaron L. and Bullock, John G.. 2017. “Reference Rot: An Emerging Threat to Transparency in Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 50 (1): 166–171.Google Scholar

Gherghina, Sergiu and Katsanidou, Alexia. 2013. “Data Availability in Political Science Journals.” European Political Science 12 (3): 333–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ghiasi, Gita, Larivière, Vincent and Sugimoto, Cassidy R.. 2016. “Gender Differences in Synchronous and Diachronous Self-Citations.” In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators. Valencia, Spain: Editorial Universitat Politecnica de Valencia.Google Scholar

Gibler, Douglas M., Miller, Steven M. and Little, Erin K.. 2016. Analysis of the Militarized Interstate Dispute (MID) Dataset, 1816–2001. International Studies Quarterly 60 (December): 719–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gieryn, Thomas. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2015. “The Temporary Importance of Role Models for Women’s Political Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (4): 957–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilbert, Christopher L. 1989. “LSE and the British Approach to Time Series Econometrics.” Oxford Economic Papers, New Series 41 (1): 108–128.Google Scholar

Gilbert, Daniel T., King, Gary, Pettigrew, Stephen and Wilson, Timothy D.. 2016. “Comment on ‘Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science.’” Science 351 (6277): 1037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Giner-Sorolla, Roger. 2012. “Science or Art? How Aesthetic Standards Grease the Way Through the Publication Bottleneck but Undermine Science.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 7 (6): 562–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gingras, Y. 2016. Bibliometrics and Research Evaluation: Uses and Abuses. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ginther, Donna K. and Kahn, Shulamit. 2004. “Women in Economics: Moving Up or Falling Off the Academic Career Ladder?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 18 (3): 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glandon, Philip. 2010. “Report on the American Economic Review Data Availability Compliance Project.” Vanderbilt University. https://aeaweb.org/aer/2011_Data_Compliance_Report.pdf.Google Scholar

Glaser, Barney and Strauss, Anselm. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Glass, Gene V., Smith, Mary Lee and McGaw, Barry. 1981. Meta-Analysis in Social Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Glennerster, Rachel and Takavarasha, Kudzai. 2013. Running Randomized Evaluations: A Practical Guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gleser, Leon J. 1986. “Some Notes on Refereeing.” The American Statistician 40 (4): 310–312.Google Scholar

Go, Julian. 2016. Postcolonial Thought and Social Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goertz, Gary. 2017. “Descriptive-Causal Generalizations: ‘Empirical Laws’ in the Social Sciences?” Pp. 85–108 in Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Kincaid, Harold (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Goertz, Gary and Mahoney, James. 2012. “Concepts and Measurement: Ontology and Epistemology.” Social Science Information 51 (2): 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday and Company.Google Scholar

Goldberg, Pinelopi Koujianou. 2016. “Report of the Editor: American Economic Review.” American Economic Review 106 (5): 700–712.Google Scholar

Goldin, Claudia. 1992. Understanding the Gender Gap: An Economic History of American Women. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Goldin, Claudia. 2006. “The Quiet Revolution that Transformed Women’s Employment, Education, and Family.” American Economic Review 96 (2): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar