Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-cd4964975-8tfrx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-04-02T01:34:06.347Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true


Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Colin Elman
Syracuse University, New York
John Gerring
University of Texas, Austin
James Mahoney
Northwestern University, Illinois
Get access


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
The Production of Knowledge
Enhancing Progress in Social Science
, pp. 487 - 542
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


AAPOR. 2017. “AAPOR Transparency Certification Agreement.” Oakbrook Terrace, IL: American Association for Public Opinion Research. Scholar
Abbott, Andrew. 2001. Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Abbott, Andrew. 2011. “Library Research Infrastructure for Humanistic and Social Scientific Scholarship in the Twentieth Century.” Pp. 4388 in Social Knowledge in the Making, edited by Camic, Charles, Gross, Neil and Lamont, Michèle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Abend, Gabriel. 2006. “Styles of Sociological Thought: Sociologies, Epistemologies, and the Mexican and U.S. Quests for Truth.” Sociological Theory 24: 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abreu, Maria, de Groot, Henri L. F. and Florax, Raymond J. G. M.. 2005. “A Meta-Analysis of β-Convergence: The Legendary 2%.” Journal of Economic Surveys 19 (3): 389420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abt, Helmut A. and Garfield, Eugene. 2002. “Is the Relationship between Numbers of References and Paper Lengths the Same for All Sciences?Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53 (13): 11061112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon and Robinson, James A.. 2001. “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation.” American Economic Review 91 (5): 13691401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon and Robinson, James A.. 2002. “Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (4): 12311294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AEA. 2018. “Reports from the American Economics Association Committee on the Status of Women in the Profession.” Scholar
Aiken, Alexander M., Davey, Calum, Hargreaves, James R. and Hayes, Richard J.. 2015. “Re-Analysis of Health and Educational Impacts of a School-Based Deworming Programme in Western Kenya: A Pure Replication.” International Journal of Epidemiology 44 (5): 1572–1580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akbaritabar, Aliakbar and Squazzoni, Flaminio. 2018. “Gender and Ethnic Patterns of Publication in Top Sociology Journals (Success Stories Only!).” GECS (Research Group in Experimental and Computational Sociology) seminars, January 10, 2018, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.Google Scholar
Alatas, Vivi, Banerjee, Abhijit, Hanna, Rema, Olken, Benjamin A. and Tobias, Julia. 2012. “Targeting the Poor: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia.” American Economic Review 102 (4): 12061240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Albouy, David Y. 2012. “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation: Comment.” American Economic Review 102 (6): 30593076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ale Ebrahim, Nader, Ebrahimian, Hamed, Mousavi, Maryam and Tahriri, Farzad. 2015. “Does a Long Reference List Guarantee More Citations? Analysis of Malaysian Highly Cited and Review Papers.” International Journal of Management Science and Business 1 (3): 615.Google Scholar
Alimohammadi, Dariush and Sajjadi, Mahshid. 2009. “Correlation between References and Citations.” Webology 6 (2): a71.Google Scholar
Allcott, Hunt and Taubinsky, Dmitry. 2015. “Evaluating Behaviorally Motivated Policy: Experimental Evidence from the Lightbulb Market.” American Economic Review 105 (8): 25012538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altbach, Philip G. (ed). 2000. The Changing Academic Workplace: Comparative Perspectives. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College Center for International Higher Education.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J., Jean Clipperton, Emily Schraudenbach and Laura Rozier. 2018. “Gender and Status in American Political Science: Who Determines Whether a Scholar Is Noteworthy?” SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3235786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Political Science Association (APSA). 2012. A Guide to Professional Ethics in Political Science. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Amsen, Eva. 2014. “What Is Open Peer Review?” F1000Research, May 21. Scholar
Anderson, Christopher J., Bahník, Štěpán, Barnett-Cowan, Michael, Bosco, Frank A., Chandler, Jesse, Chartier, Christopher R., Cheung, Felix, et al. 2016. “Response to Comment on ‘Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science.’” Science 351 (6277): 1037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, Melissa S., Martinson, Brian C. and Vries, Raymond De. 2007. “Normative Dissonance in Science: Results from a National Survey of U.S. Scientists.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 2 (4): 314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Michael L. 2008. “Multiple Inference and Gender Differences in the Effects of Early Intervention: A Reevaluation of the Abecedarian, Perry Preschool, and Early Training Projects.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 103 (484): 14811495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Richard G. and Dewald, William G.. 1994. “Replication and Scientific Standards in Applied Economics a Decade after the Journal of Money, Credit and Banking Project.” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review no. Nov: 7983.Google Scholar
Anderson, Richard G., Greene, William H., McCullough, Bruce D. and Vinod, Hrishikesh D.. 2008. “The Role of Data/Code Archives in the Future of Economic Research.” Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (1): 99119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreoli-Versbach, Patrick and Mueller-Langer, Frank. 2014. “Open Access to Data: An Ideal Professed but Not Practised.” Research Policy. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angell, Robert. 1936. The Family Encounters the Depression. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Angrist, Joshua D. and Pischke, Jörn-Steffen. 2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angrist, Joshua D. and Pischke, Jörn-Steffen. 2010. “The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design Is Taking the Con out of Econometrics.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 24 (2): 330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angrist, Joshua D. and Pischke, Jörn-Steffen. 2014. Mastering ‘Metrics: The Path from Cause to Effect. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ankeny, Rachel A. 2011. “Using Cases to Establish Novel Diagnoses: Creating Generic Facts by Making Particular Facts Travel Together.” Pp. 252–272 in S. Morgan and P. Howlett (eds), How Well Do Facts Travel? The Dissemination of Reliable Knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Annas, George J. 2003. “HIPAA Regulations – A New Era of Medical-Record Privacy?New England Journal of Medicine 348 (15): 14861490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antecol, Heather, Bedard, Kelly and Stearns, Jenna. 2018. “Equal but Inequitable: Who Benefits from Gender-Neutral Tenure Clock Stopping Policies?American Economic Review 108 (9): 2420–2441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
APA. 2016. “Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct.” Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Scholar
APSA. 2012. A Guide to Professional Ethics in Political Science. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
APSA. 2016. “P- WAM20: Pipeline for Women and Minorities in the 20 Largest Departments – Data for Faculty and Students.” Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
ASA. 1997. “Code of Ethics of the ASA Committee on Professional Ethics.” Washington, DC: American Sociological Association. Scholar
Ashenfelter, Orley and Greenstone, Michael. 2004. “Estimating the Value of a Statistical Life: The Importance of Omitted Variables and Publication Bias.” Princeton University, Department of Economics, Center for Economic Policy Studies., Working Papers: 105, 2004. Scholar
Ashenfelter, Orley, Harmon, Colm and Oosterbeek, Hessel. 1999. “A Review of Estimates of the Schooling/Earnings Relationship, with Tests for Publication Bias.” Princeton, Department of Economics – Industrial Relations Sections, Princeton, Department of Economics – Industrial Relations Sections, 1999. Scholar
Atchison, Amy L. 2017. “Negating the Gender Citation Advantage in Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 50 (2): 448455.Google Scholar
Atmanspacher, Harald and Maasen, Sabine (eds). 2016. Reproducibility: Principles, Problems, Practices, and Prospects. New York: John Wiley and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babcock, Linda, Recalde, Maria P. and Vesterlund, Lise. 2017a. “Gender Differences in the Allocation of Low-Promotability Tasks: The Role of Backlash.” American Economic Review, 107 (5): 131135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babcock, Linda, Recalde, Maria P., Vesterlund, Lise and Weingart, Laurie. 2017b. “Gender Differences in Accepting and Receiving Requests for Tasks with Low Promotability.” American Economic Review, 107 (3): 714747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backhouse, Roger E. and Morgan, Mary S.. 2000. “Introduction: Is Data Mining a Methodological Problem?Journal of Economic Methodology 7 (2): 171–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bai, Liang, Handel, Benjamin, Miguel, Edward and Rao, Gautam. 2015. “Self-Control and Chronic Illness: Evidence from Commitment Contracts for Doctor Visits.” Unpublished manuscript. UC Berkeley.Google Scholar
Baicker, Katherine, Finkelstein, Amy, Song, Jae and Taubman, Sarah. 2014. “The Impact of Medicaid on Labor Market Activity and Program Participation: Evidence from the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment.” American Economic Review 104 (5): 322328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baicker, Katherine, Taubman, Sarah L., Allen, Heidi L., Bernstein, Mira, Gruber, Jonathan H., Newhouse, Joseph P., Schneider, Eric C., Wright, Bill J., Zaslavsky, Alan M. and Finkelstein, Amy N.. 2013. “The Oregon Experiment – Effects of Medicaid on Clinical Outcomes.” New England Journal of Medicine 368 (18): 17131722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakkensen, Laura A. and Larson, William. 2014. “Population Matters When Modeling Hurricane Fatalities.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111 (50): E5331–E5332.Google ScholarPubMed
Ball, P. 2008. “A Longer Paper Gathers More Citations.” Nature 455 (7211): 274275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bandalos, Deborah L. 2018. Measurement Theory and Applications in the Social Sciences. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Bar-Sinai, Michael, Sweeney, Latanya and Crosas, Merce. 2016. “DataTags, Data Handling Policy Spaces and the Tags Language.” In 2016 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW), 18. doi:10.1109/SPW.2016.11.Google Scholar
Bargh, John A., Chen, Mark and Burrows, Lara. 1996. “Automaticity of Social Behavior: Direct Effects of Trait Construct and Stereotype-Activation on Action.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71: 230244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Tiffany D. and Beaulieu, Emily. 2017. “Engaging Women: Addressing the Gender Gap in Women’s Networking and Productivity.” PS: Political Science and Politics 50 (2): 461466.Google Scholar
Barone, Tom and Elliot, Eisner (eds). 2011. Arts-Based Research. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1997. “Specification Uncertainty and Model Averaging.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (2): 641674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, Allen. 1979. “Paul Lazarsfeld and Applied Social Research: Invention of the University Applied Social Research Institute.” Social Science History 3 (3): 444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, Judith. 1984. Guide to the Bureau of Applied Social Research. New York: Clearwater Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Basken, Paul. 2018. “UT-Austin Professors Join Campaign Against Faculty-Productivity Company.” Chronicle of Higher Education (January 24).Google Scholar
Bastow, Simon, Dunleavy, Patrick and Tinkler, Jane. 2014. The Impact of the Social Sciences: How Academics and their Research Make a Difference. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basu, Aparna. 2006. “Using ISI’s ‘Highly Cited Researchers’ to Obtain a Country Level Indicator of Citation Excellence.” Scientometrics 68(3): 361375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateman, Ian, Kahneman, Daniel, Munro, Alistair, Starmer, Chris and Sugden, Robert. 2005. “Testing Competing Models of Loss Aversion: An Adversarial Collaboration.” Journal of Public Economics, The Experimental Approaches to Public Economics 89 (8): 15611580.Google Scholar
Baumeister, Roy F. 2016. “Charting the Future of Social Psychology on Stormy Seas: Winners, Losers, and Recommendations.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 66: 153158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, Roy F. and Leary, Mark R.. 1997. “Writing Narrative Literature Reviews.” Review of General Psychology 1 (3): 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, Roy F. and Vohs., Kathleen D. 2016. “Misguided Effort with Elusive Implications.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 11 (4): 574575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beach, Derek and Pederson, Rasmus Brun. 2013. Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaman, Lori, Chattopadhyay, Raghabendra, Duflo, Ester, Pande, Rohini and Topalova, Petia. 2008. Powerful Women: Does Exposure Reduce Bias? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaman, Lori, Duflo, Esther, Pande, Rohini and Topalova, Petia. 2012. “Female Leadership Raises Aspirations and Educational Attainment for Girls: A Policy Experiment in India.” Science 335 (6068): 582586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bear, Julia B. and Collier, Benjamin. 2016. “Where are the Women in Wikipedia? Understanding the Different Psychological Experiences of Men and Women in Wikipedia.” Sex Roles 74 (5–6): 254265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Begg, Colin, Cho, Mildred, Eastwood, Susan Richard Horton, David Moher, Ingram Olkin, Roy Pitkin, Drummond Rennie, Kenneth F. Schulz, David Simel and Donna F. Stroup. 1996. “Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials: The Consort Statement.” Journal of the American Medical Association 276 (8): 637639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, Mark S. and Miller, Nicholas L.. 2015. “Questioning the Effect of Nuclear Weapons on Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 59 (1): 7492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellavance, François, Dionne, Georges and Lebeau, Martin. 2009. “The Value of a Statistical Life: A Meta-Analysis with a Mixed Effects Regression Model.” Journal of Health Economics 28 (2): 444464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bellesiles, Michael A. 2000. Arming America: The Origins of a National Gun Culture. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Benjamini, Yoav and Hochberg, Yosef. 1995. “Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 57 (1): 289300.Google Scholar
Benjamini, Yoav, Krieger, Abba M. and Yekutieli, Daniel. 2006. “Adaptive Linear Step-up Procedures That Control the False Discovery Rate.” Biometrika 93 (3): 491507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamini, Yoav and Yekutieli, Daniel. 2001. “The Control of the False Discovery Rate in Multiple Testing under Dependency.” The Annals of Statistics 29 (4): 11651188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennet, Andrew. 2010. “Process Tracing and Casual Inference.” In H. E. Brady and D. Collier (eds), Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew and Jeffrey, Checkel (eds). 2015. Process Tracing in the Social Sciences: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew. 2015. “Appendix.” Pp. 276–298 in Bennett, Andrew and Checkel, Jeffrey (eds), Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berelson, Bernard, Lazarsfeld, Paul and McPhee, William. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Berge, Lars Ivar Oppedal, Bjorvatn, Kjetil, Galle, Simon, Miguel, Edward, Posner, Daniel N., Tungodden, Bertil and Zhang, Kelly. 2015. “How Strong Are Ethnic Preferences?” Working Paper 21715. National Bureau of Economic Research. Scholar
Berger, James and Berry, Donald. 1988. “Statistical Analysis and the Illusion of Objectivity.” American Scientist (March–April): 159165.Google Scholar
Berger, Ulrich. 2009. “The Convergence of Fictitious Play in Games with Strategic Complementarities: A Comment.” IDEAS Working Paper Series from RePEc. Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J., Druckman, James N. and Yamamoto, Teppei. 2018. “Why Replications Do Not Fix the Reproducibility Crisis: A Model and Evidence from a Large-Scale Vignette Experiment.” Unpublished paper, Department of Political Science, MIT.Google Scholar
Berkenkotter, Carol. 1995. “The Power and the Perils of Peer Review.” Rhetoric Review 13 (2): 245248.Google Scholar
Bernanke, Ben S. 2004. “Editorial Statement.” American Economic Review 94 (1): 404404.Google Scholar
Bertrand, Marianne, Kamenica, Emir and Pan, Jessica. 2015. “Gender Identity and Relative Income Within Households.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 130 (2): 571614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, Marianne and Mullainathan, Sendhil. 2004. “Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination.” American Economic Review 94 (4): 9911013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bess, James L. 1998. “Contract Systems, Bureaucracies, and Faculty Motivation: The Probable Effects of a No-Tenure Policy.” Journal of Higher Education 69 (1): 122.Google Scholar
Bettinger, Eric P. and Long, Bridget Terry. 2005. “Do Faculty Serve as Role models? The Impact of Instructor Gender on Female Students.” American Economic Review 95 (2): 152157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettis, Richard A., Helfat, Constance E. and Shaver, J. Myles. 2016. “The Necessity, Logic, and Forms of Replication.” Strategic Management Journal 37 (11): 21932203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhaskar, Roy. 1979. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Bhattacharjee, Yudhijit. 2013. “Diederik Stapel’s Audacious Academic Fraud.” New York Times, April 26, 2013, sec. Magazine. Scholar
Bianchi, Suzanne M., Sayer, Liana C., Milkie, Melissa A. and Robinson, John P.. 2012. “Housework: Who Did, Does or Will Do It, and How Much Does It Matter?Social Forces 91 (1): 5563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bichsel, Jacqueline and McChesney, Jasper 2017. The Gender Pay Gap and the Representation of Women in Higher Education Administrative Positions: The Century So Far. Research report. CUPA-HR. February. Scholar
Bierer, Barbara E., Crosas, Mercè and Pierce, Heather H.. 2017. “Data Authorship as an Incentive to Data Sharing.” New England Journal of Medicine 376 (17): 1684–1687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bishop, Libby. 2005. “Protecting Respondents and Enabling Data Sharing: Reply to Parry and Mauthner.” Sociology 39 (2): 333336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, Libby. 2009. “Ethical Sharing and Reuse of Qualitative Data.” Australian Journal of Social Issues 44 (3): 255272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, Libby. 2014. “Re-Using Qualitative Data: A Little Evidence, on-Going Issues and Modest Reflections.” Studia Socjologiczne 3: 167.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Robert T. and Lawrence, Janet H.. 1995. Faculty at Work: Motivation, Expectation, Satisfaction. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Robert T. and Havighurst, Robert J.. 1979. “Career Patterns of US Male Academic Social Scientists.” Higher Education 8 (5): 553572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bland, J. Martin and Altman, Douglas G.. 1995. “Multiple Significance Tests: The Bonferroni Method.” BMJ: British Medical Journal 310 (6973): 170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blau, Francine D. and Kahn, Lawrence M.. 2000. “Gender Differences in Pay.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 (4): 7599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumer, Herbert. 1933. Movies and Conduct. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Boas, Taylor. 2010. “Varieties of Electioneering: Success Contagion and Presidential Campaigns in Latin America.World Politics 62 (4): 636675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boas, Taylor. 2015. “Voting for Democracy: Campaign Effects in Chile’s Democratic Transition.” Latin American Politics and Society 57 (2): 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boas, Taylor. 2016. Presidential Campaigns in Latin America: Electoral Strategies and Success Contagion. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bohannon, John. 2016. “About 40% of Economics Experiments Fail Replication Survey.” Science, March. doi:10.1126/science.aaf4141.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles. 2015. Political Order and Inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bontemps, Christophe and Mizon, Grayham E.. 2008. “Encompassing: Concepts and Implementation.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 70 (December): 721750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, Chamboredon, Jean-Claude and Passeron, Jean-Claude. [1968] 1991. The Craft of Sociology: Epistemological Preliminaries. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgatti, Stephen P., Everett, Martin G. and Johnson, Jeffrey C.. 2018. Analyzing Social Networks. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Borgman, Christine L. 2009. “The Digital Future Is Now: A Call to Action for the Humanities.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 3 (4). Scholar
Borgman, Christine L. 2012. “The Conundrum of Sharing Research Data.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63 (6): 10591078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornmann, Lutz, Schier, Hermann, Marx, Werner and Daniel, Hans-Dieter. 2012. “What Factors Determine Citation Counts of Publications in Chemistry Besides their Quality?Journal of Informetrics 6 (1): 1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornmann, Lutz and Daniel, Hans Dieter. 2008. “What Do Citation Counts Measure? A Review of Studies on Citing Behavior.” Journal of Documentation 64 (1): 4580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornmann, Lutz, Marx, Werner and Haunschild, Robin. 2016. “Calculating Journal Rankings: Peer Review, Bibliometrics, and Alternative Metrics?” Pp. 4255 in Ciaran Sugre and Serfika Mertkan (eds), Publishing and the Academic World: Passion, Purpose, and Possible Futures. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Borsuk, Robyn M., Budden, Amber E., Leimu, Roosa, Aarssen, Lonnie W. and Lortie, Christopher J.. 2009. “The Influence of Author Gender, National Language and Number of Authors on Citation Rate in Ecology.” Open Ecology Journal 2: 2528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, Chamboredon, Jean-Claude and Claude-Passeron, Jean. 1991. The Craft of Sociology: Epistemological Preliminaries. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boutron, Isabelle, Moher, David, Altman, Douglas G., Schulz, Kenneth F. and Ravaud, Philippe. 2008. “Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration.” Annals of Internal Medicine 148 (4): 295309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, Jake. 2011. “Six Steps to a Better Relationship with Your Future Self.” The Political Methodologist 18 (2): 28.Google Scholar
Bowers, Jake, Jonathan Nagler, John Gerring, Alan Jacobs, Don Green and Macartan Humphreys. 2015. “A Proposal for a Political Science Registry.” Available at Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Brady, Henry E. and Collier, David. 2008. The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Cunha, Raphael C., Varbanov, Roumen A., Hoh, Yee Shwen, Knisley, Margaret L. and Holmes, Mary Alice. 2015. “Survival Analysis of Faculty Retention and Promotion in the Social Sciences by Gender.” PloS ONE, 10, e0143093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Brady, Henry and Collier, David (eds). 2008. The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brady, Henry E. and David, Collier (eds). 2010. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. 2nd ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Brajer, Victor and Gill, Andrew. 2010. “Yakity-Yak: Who Talks Back? An Email Experiment.” Social Science Quarterly 91 (4): 10071024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Mark J., IJzerman, Hans, Dijksterhuis, Ap, Farach, Frank J., Geller, Jason, Giner-Sorolla, Roger, Grange, James A., Perugini, Marco, Spies, Jeffrey R. and Veer, Anna van ‘t. 2014. “The Replication Recipe: What Makes for a Convincing Replication?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 50: 217224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breuer, Peter T. and Bowen, Jonathan P.. 2014. “Empirical Patterns in Google Scholar Citation Counts.” ArXiv:1401.1861 [Cs], April, 398403. Scholar
Breznau, Nate. 2015. “The Missing Main Effect of Welfare State Regimes: A Replication of ‘Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies’ by Brooks and Manza.” Sociological Science 2: 420441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broad, William and Wade, Nicholas. 1983. Betrayers of the Truth. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Brodeur, Abel, Le, Mathias, Sangnier, Marc and Zylberberg, Yanos. 2016. “Star Wars: The Empirics Strike Back.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 8 (1): 132.Google Scholar
Broockman, David, Kalla, Joshua and Aranow, Peter. 2015. “Irregularities in LaCour (2014).” UC Berkeley. Scholar
Brooks, Clem. 2014. “Nations, Classes, and the Politics of Professors: A Comparative Perspective.” Pp. 82108 in Gross, Neil and Simmons, Solon (eds), Professors and Their Politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, Clem and Manza, Jeff. 2006. “Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies.” American Sociological Review 71 (3): 474494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broom, Alex, Cheshire, Lynda and Emmison, Michael. 2009. “Qualitative Researchers’ Understandings of Their Practice and the Implications for Data Archiving and Sharing.” Sociology 43 (6): 11631180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Nadia E. 2014. Sisters in the Statehouse: Black Women and Legislative Decision Making. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Robert. 1984. The Nature of Social Laws: Machiavelli to Mill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brzezinski, Michal. 2015. “Power Laws in Citation Distributions: Evidence from Scopus.” Scientometrics 103 (1): 213228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckley, William. 1951. God and Man at Yale: The Superstitions of Academic Freedom. Chicago: Regnery.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Gleditsch, Nils Petter, James, Patrick, King, Gary, Metelits, Claire, Ray, James Lee, Russett, Bruce, Strand, Havard and Valeriano, Brandon. 2003. “Symposium on Replication in International Studies Research.” International Studies Perspectives 4 (1): 72107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Smith, Alastair, Siverson, Randolph M. and Morrow, James D.. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burlig, Fiona. 2018. “Improving Transparency in Observational Social Science Research: A Pre-Analysis Plan Approach.” Economics Letters 168: 5660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnside, Craig and Dollar, David. 2000. “Aid, Policies, and Growth.” American Economic Review 90 (4): 847868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnside, Craig and Dollar, David. 2004. “Aid, Policies, and Growth: Reply.” American Economic Review 94 (3): 781784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, Tony. 2016. “Understanding the Peer-Review Process: Reject, Revise, Resubmit.” Pp. 9098 in Sugre, Ciaran and Mertkan, Serfika (eds), Publishing and the Academic World: Passion, Purpose, and Possible Futures. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Courtney and Currier, Brett. 2017. “You Can’t Replicate What You Can’t Find: Data Preservation Policies in Economic Journals.” presented at the IASSIST 2017, Lawrence, Kansas, May 25. Scholar
Callaham, Michael, Wears, Robert L. and Weber, Ellen. 2002. “Journal Prestige, Publication Bias, and Other Characteristics Associated With Citation of Published Studies in Peer-Reviewed Journals.” Journal of the American Medical Association 287 (21): 28472850.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calvert, Melanie, Blazeby, Jane, Altman, Douglas G., Dennis A. Revicki, David Moher and Michael D. Brundage. 2013. “Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Trials: The Consort pro Extension.” Journal of the American Medical Association 309 (8): 814822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camerer, Colin F., Dreber, Anna, Forsell, Eskil, Ho, Teck-Hua, Huber, Jürgen, Johannesson, Magnus, Kirchler, Michael et al. 2016. “Evaluating Replicability of Laboratory Experiments in Economics.” Science 351 (6280): 14331436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camfield, Laura and Palmer-Jones, Richard. 2013. “Three ‘Rs’ of Econometrics: Repetition, Reproduction and Replication.” Journal of Development Studies 49 (12): 16071614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camic, Charles. 2007. “On Edge: Sociology During the Great Depression and the New Deal.” Pp. 225280 in Craig Calhoun (ed.), Sociology in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camic, Charles and Gross, Neil. 2001. “The New Sociology of Ideas.” Pp. 236249 in Judith Blau (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Sociology. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Camic, Charles, Neil, Gross and Michèle, Lamont (eds). 2011. Social Knowledge in the Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camic, Charles, Neil, Gross and Michèle, Lamont 2011. “Introduction: The Study of Social Knowledge Making.” Pp. 140 in Camic, Charles, Gross, Neil and Lamont, Michèle (eds), Social Knowledge in the Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Donald T. 1979. “Assessing the Impact of Planned Social Change.” Evaluation and Program Planning 2 (1): 6790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, John and Pedersen, Ove. 2014. The National Origins of Policy Ideas: Knowledge Regimes in the United States, France, Germany, and Denmark. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Marion K., Elbourne, Diana R. and Altman, Douglas G.. 2004. “CONSORT Statement: Extension to Cluster Randomised Trials.” British Medical Journal 328 (7441): 702708.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, Marion K., Elbourne, Diana R. and Altman, Douglas G.. 2012. “Consort 2010 Statement: Extension to Cluster Randomised Trials.” British Medical Journal 345: e5661.Google Scholar
Campolieti, Michele, Gunderson, Morley and Riddell, Chris. 2006. “Minimum Wage Impacts from a Prespecified Research Design: Canada 1981–1997.” Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society 45 (2): 195216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Card, David. 1992a. “Do Minimum Wages Reduce Employment? A Case Study of California, 1987–89.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 46 (1): 3854.Google Scholar
Card, David. 1992b. “Using Regional Variation in Wages to Measure the Effects of the Federal Minimum Wage.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 46 (1): 2237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Card, David and Krueger, Alan B. 1994. “Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast-Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania.” American Economic Review 84 (4): 772793.Google Scholar
Card, David and Krueger, Alan B. 1995. “Time-Series Minimum-Wage Studies: A Meta-Analysis.” American Economic Review 85 (2): 238243.Google Scholar
Card, David and Krueger, Alan B. 2000. “Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast-Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania: Reply.” American Economic Review 90 (5): 13971420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Card, David, Chetty, Raj, Feldstein, Martin and Saez, Emmanuel. 2010. “Expanding Access to Administrative Data for Research in the United States.” 112. NSF SBE 2020. Scholar
Card, David and DellaVigna, S.. 2014. “Page Limits on Economics Articles: Evidence from Two Journals.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 28 (3): 149167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, Benedict. 2011. “Noted Dutch Psychologist, Stapel, Accused of Research Fraud.” New York Times, November 2, sec. Health/Research. Scholar
Carr, Phyllis L., Gunn, Christine M., Kaplan, Samantha A., Raj, Anita and Freund, Karen M. 2015. “Inadequate Progress for Women in Academic Medicine: Findings from the National Faculty Study.” Journal of Women’s Health 24 (3): 190199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carsey, Thomas M. 2014. “Making DA-RT a Reality.” PS, Political Science and Politics 47 (1): 7277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy. 1999. The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, Katherine, Glennerster, Rachel and Miguel, Edward. 2012. “Reshaping Institutions: Evidence on Aid Impacts Using a Preanalysis Plan.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 127 (4): 17551812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casselman, Ben. 2012. “Economists Set Rules on Ethics.” Wall Street Journal, January 9, sec. Careers. Scholar
Catalini, Christian, Lacetera, Nicola and Oettl, Alexander. 2015. “The Incidence and Role of Negative Citations in Science.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (45): 1382313826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caverley, Jonathan D. 2009/2010. “The Myth of Military Myopia: Democracy, Small Wars, and Vietnam.” International Security 34 (Winter): 119157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caverley, Jonathan D. 2010/2011. “Explaining U.S. Military Strategy in Vietnam: Thinking Clearly About Causation.” International Security 35 (Winter): 124143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centeno, Miguel. 2002. Blood and Debt: War and the Nation State in Latin America. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Chalmers, Alan F. 2013. What is This Thing Called Science? New York: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Chambers, Christopher. 2013. “Registered Reports: A New Publishing Initative at Cortex.” Cortex 49: 609610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, Christopher, Feredoes, Eva, Muthukumaraswamy, Suresh D. and Etchells, Peter J.. 2014. “Instead of ‘Playing the Game’ It Is Time to Change the Rules: Registered Reports at AIMS Neuroscience and Beyond.” AIMS Environmental Science 1 (1): 417.Google Scholar
Chang, Andrew C. and Li, Phillip. 2015. “Is Economics Research Replicable? Sixty Published Papers from Thirteen Journals Say ‘Usually Not.’” Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2015–83. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (US).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, Colin D., Christian Benedict and Helgi B. Schiöth. 2018. “Experimenter Gender and Replicability in Science.” Science Advances 4 (1): 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Jihui, Kim, Myongjin and Liu, Qihong. 2017. “Gender Gap in Tenure and Promotion: Evidence from the Economics Ph.D. Class of 2008.” Available at SSRN: or Scholar
Chenault, Larry A. 1984. “A Note on the Stability Limitations in ‘A Stable Price Adjustment Process.’Quarterly Journal of Economics 99 (2): 385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chernoff, Fred. 2014. Explanation and Progress in Security Studies: Bridging Theoretical Divides in International Relations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2009. “Opening Remarks.” Pp. 1343 in Piattelli-Palmarini, Massimo et al. (eds), Of Minds and Language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Choo, Hae Yeon and Ferree., Myra Marx 2010. “Practicing Intersectionality in Sociological Research: A Critical Analysis of Inclusions, Interactions, and Institutions in the Study of Inequalities.” Sociological Theory 28 (2): 129149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Björn and Christensen, Sören. 2014. “Are Female Hurricanes Really Deadlier than Male Hurricanes?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (34): E3497–E3498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, Darin, Hartman, Alexandra and Samii, Cyrus. 2018. “Property Rights, Investment, and Land Grabs: An Institutional Natural Experiment in Liberia.” Unpublished working paper. Available online at Scholar
Christensen, Garret and Miguel, Edward. 2018. “Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research.” Journal of Economic Literature 56 (3): 920980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciccone, Antonio. 2011. “Economic Shocks and Civil Conflict: A Comment.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 3 (4): 215227.Google Scholar
Clemens, Michael. 2017. “The Meaning of Failed Replications: A Review and Proposal.” Journal of Economic Surveys 31(February): 326342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, Kenneth W. and Wang, Patricia. 2003. “Who Cites What?Economic Record 79 (245): 229244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffman, Lucas C. and Niederle, Muriel. 2015. “Pre-Analysis Plans have Limited Upside, Especially Where Replications are Feasible.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (3): 8197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jacob. 1994. “The Earth is Round (p < .05).” American Psychologist 49: 997–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen-Cole, Ethan, Durlauf, Steven, Fagan, Jeffrey and Nagin, Daniel. 2009. “Model Uncertainty and the Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment.” American Law and Economics Review 11 (2): 335369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Stephen. 1994. “Why Sociology Doesn’t Make Progress like the Natural Sciences.” Sociological Forum 9: 133154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, James. 1958. Nigeria: Background to Nationalism. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, James, Katz, Elihu and Menzel, Herbert. 1966. Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Colgan, Jeff. 2017. “Gender Bias in International Relations Graduate Education? New Evidence from Syllabi.” PS: Political Science and Politics 50 (2): 456460.Google Scholar
Colgrove, James. 2006. “The Ethics and Politics of Compulsory HPV Vaccination.” The New England Journal of Medicine 355: 23892391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collier, David. 2011. “Understanding Process Tracing.PS:Political Science and Politics 44 (4): 823830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, David, Brady, Henry and Seawright, Jason. 2004. “Sources of Leverage in Causal Inference: Toward an Alternative View of Methodology.” Pp. 229–266 in Brady, Henry and Collier, David (eds), Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Collier, David and Mahon, James E., Jr. 1993. “Conceptual ‘Stretching’ Revisited: Adapting Categories in Comparative Analysis.American Political Science Review 87 (4): 845855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins and Mahoney, James. 1997. “Adding Collective Actors to Collective Outcomes: Labor and Recent Democratization in South America and Southern Europe.” Comparative Politics 29 (3): 285303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Harry M. 1985. Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Collins, Harry M. 1991. “The Meaning of Replication and the Science of Economics.” History of Political Economy 23: 123142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Harry M. 1998. “The Meaning of Data: Open and Closed Evidential Cultures in the Search for Gravitational Waves.” American Journal of Sociology 104 (2): 293338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Randall. 1994. “Why the Social Sciences Won’t Become High-Consensus, Rapid-Discovery Science.” Sociological Forum 9 (2): 155177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Randall. 1998. The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnston. 1988. “The Role of Social Groups in Political Thinking.” British Journal of Political Science 5176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Jean. 1987. Survey Research in the United States: Roots and Emergence 1890–1960. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 2012. Democratization and Research Methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, Michael, Gerring, John, Altman, David, Bernhard, Michael, Fish, Steven, Hicken, Allen, Kroenig, Matthew, Lindberg, Staffan I., McMann, Kelly, Paxton, Pamela, Semetko, Holli A., Skaaning, Svend-Erik, Staton, Jeffrey and Teorell, Jan. 2011. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: A New Approach.” Perspectives on Politics 9 (2, June): 247267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbyn, Zoe. 2008. “Unpaid Peer Review is worth £1.9bn.” Times Higher Education, May 29.Google Scholar
Correspondence: David H. Autor and Bruno S. Frey.” 2011. Journal of Economic Perspectives 25 (3): 239240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corti, Louise and Gregory, Arofan. 2011. “CAQDAS Comparability. What About CAQDAS Data Exchange?Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 12 (1). Scholar
Corti, Louise, Eynden, Veerle van den, Bishop, Libby and Woollard, Matthew. 2014. Managing and Sharing Research Data: A Guide to Good Practice. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Costas, Rodrigo, Zahedi, Zohreh and Wouters, Paul. 2014. “How Well Developed are Altmetrics? A Cross-Disciplinary Analysis of the Presence of ‘Alternative Metrics’ in Scientific Publications.” Scientometrics 101 (2): 14911513.Google Scholar
Costas, Rodrigo, Zahedi, Zohreh and Wouters, Paul. 2015. “Do ‘Altmetrics’ Correlate with Citations? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66: 20032019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowen, Tyler and Tabarrok, Alex. 2016. “A Skeptical View of the National Science Foundation’s Role in Economic Research.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 30 (3): 235248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Richard. 1961. The Algebra of Probable Inference. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1989. “Demarginalizing The Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Antiracist Politics.” University of Chicago Legal Forces, 139168Google Scholar
Cronin, Blaise. 1984. The Citation Process. The Role and Significance of Citations in Scientific Communication. London: Taylor Graham.Google Scholar
Cronin, Blaise and Sugimoto, Cassidy R. (eds). 2014. Beyond Bibliometrics: Harnessing Multidimensional Indicators of Scholarly Impact. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumming, Geoff. 2008. “Replication and p Intervals: P Values Predict the Future Only Vaguely, but Confidence Intervals Do Much Better.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 3: 286300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cumming, Geoff and Maillardet, Robert. 2006. “Confidence Intervals and Replication: Where Will the Next Mean Fall?Psychological Methods 11: 217227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cumming, Geoff, Williams, Jennifer and , Fiona Fidler. 2004. “Replication, and Researchers’ Understanding of Confidence Intervals and Standard Error Bars.” Understanding Statistics 3: 299311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl Rasmussen, Ole, Malchow-Møller, Nikolaj and Andersen, Thomas Barnebeck. 2011. “Walking the Talk: The Need for a Trial Registry for Development Interventions.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 3 (4): 502519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dal-Ré, Rafael, Ioannidis, John P., Bracken, Michael B., Buffler, Patricia A., Chan, An-Wen, Franco, Eduardo L., Vecchia, Carlo La and Weiderpass, Elisabete. 2014. “Making Prospective Registration of Observational Research a Reality.” Science Translational Medicine 6 (224): 224cm1–224cm1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
David, Paul A. 1985. “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY.” American Economic Review 75 (2): 332337.Google Scholar
Davis, Graham A. 2013. “Replicating Sachs and Warner’s Working Papers on the Resource Curse.” Journal of Development Studies 49 (12): 16151630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, James. 1958. “Review of Robert Merton et al, The Student-Physician,” American Journal of Sociology 63 (4): 445446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Angelis, Catherine, Drazen, Jeffrey M., Frizelle, Frank A., Haug, Charlotte, Hoey, John, Horton, Richard, Kotzin, Sheldon et al. 2004. “Clinical Trial Registration: A Statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.” New England Journal of Medicine 351 (12): 12501251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deaton, Angus. 2010. “Instruments, Randomization, and Learning about Development.” Journal of Economic Literature 48 (2): 424455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeCoursey, Tom. 2006. “Perspective: The Pros and Cons of Open Peer Review.” Nature. Scholar
Deere, Donald, Murphy, Kevin M. and Welch, Finis. 1995. “Employment and the 1990–1991 Minimum-Wage Hike.” American Economic Review 85 (2): 232237.Google Scholar
Dekel, Eddie, Levine, David, Meghir, Costas, Newey, Whitney and Postlewaite, Andrew. 2006. “Report of the Editors.” Econometrica 74 (1): 307310.Google Scholar
Delgado López-Cózar, Emilio, Robinson-García, Nicolas and Torres-Salinas, Daniel. 2014. “The Google Scholar Experiment: How to Index False Papers and Manipulate Bibliometric Indicators.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65 (3): 446454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella and Keating, Michael (eds). 2008. Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DellaVigna, Stefano and Pope, Devin. 2016. “Predicting Experimental Results: Who Knows What?” Working Paper 22566. National Bureau of Economic Research. Scholar
DeLong, J. Bradford and Lang, Kevin. 1992. “Are All Economic Hypotheses False?Journal of Political Economy 100 (6): 12571272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denton, Frank T. 1985. “Data Mining as an Industry.” Review of Economics and Statistics 67 (1): 124127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeRigne, LeaAnne and Porterfield, Shirley L.. 2017. “Employment Change Among Married Parents of Children With Special Health Care Needs.” Journal of Family Issues 38 (5): 579606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desch, Michael C. 2008. Power and Military Effectiveness: The Fallacy of Democratic Triumphalism. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Dessler, David. 1991. “Beyond Correlations: Toward a Causal Theory of War.” International Studies Quarterly 35 (3): 337355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewald, William G., Thursby, Jerry G and Anderson, Richard G.. 1986. “Replication in Empirical Economics: The Journal of Money, Credit and Banking Project.” American Economic Review 76 (4): 587603.Google Scholar
Dezhbakhsh, Hashem, Rubin, Paul H. and Shepherd, Joanna M. 2003. “Does Capital Punishment Have a Deterrent Effect? New Evidence from Postmoratorium Panel Data.” American Law and Economics Review 5 (2): 344–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diament, Sean M., Howat, Adam J and Lacombe, Matthew J.. 2018. “Gender Representation in the American Politics Canon: An Analysis of Core Graduate Syllabi.” PS: Political Science and Politics: 16.Google Scholar
Didegah, Fereshteh and Thelwall, Mike. 2013. “Determinants of Research Citation Impact in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 (5): 10551064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijksterhuis, Ap 2013. “Replication Crisis or Crisis in Replication A Reinterpretation of Shanks et al.” Reader comment. Scholar
Dijksterhuis, Ap, Spears, Russell and Lepinasse, Vincent. 2001. “Reflecting and Deflecting Stereotypes: Assimilation and Contrast in Impression Formation and Automatic Behavior.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 37: 286299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J. and Walter W., Powell (eds). 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dimitrova, Daniela V. and Bugeja, Michael. 2007. “The Half-Life of Internet References Cited in Communication Journals.” New Media and Society 9 (5): 811826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djupe, Paul, Smith, Amy Erica and Sokhey, Anand, 2018. “Explaining Gender in the Journals: How Submission Practices Affect Publication Patterns in Political Science.” Paper presented at the Visions in Methodology Conference, Ohio State University, May 7–9.Google Scholar
Dollard, John. 1937. Caste and Class in a Southern Town. New edition. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Donohue, John J. and Levitt, Steven D.. 2001. “The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (2): 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donohue, John J. and Levitt, Steven D.. 2008. “Measurement Error, Legalized Abortion, and the Decline in Crime: A Response to Foote and Goetz (Christopher L, Foote, Christopher F. Goetz) (Report).Quarterly Journal of Economics 123 (1): 425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donohue, John J. and Wolfers, Justin. 2005. “Uses and Abuses of Empirical Evidence in the Death Penalty Debate.” Stanford Law Review 58 (3): 791845.Google Scholar
DORA. 2012. “San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment.” 2012. Scholar
Doucet, Andrea and Mauthner, Natasha S.. 2008. “What Can Be Known and How? Narrated Subjects and the Listening Guide.” Qualitative Research 8 (3): 399409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doucouliagos, Chris. 2005. “Publication Bias in the Economic Freedom and Economic Growth Literature.” Journal of Economic Surveys 19 (3): 367387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doucouliagos, Chris and Stanley, T. D.. 2013. “Are All Economic Facts Greatly Exaggerated? Theory Competition and Selectivity.” Journal of Economic Surveys 27 (2): 316339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doucouliagos, Chris, Stanley, T. D. and Giles, Margaret. 2012. “Are Estimates of the Value of a Statistical Life Exaggerated?Journal of Health Economics 31 (1): 197206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doucouliagos, Christos and Laroche, Patrice. 2003. “What Do Unions Do to Productivity? A Meta-Analysis.” Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society 42 (4): 650691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doucouliagos, Hristos, Ioannidis, John P. and Stanley, Tom. 2017. “The Power of Bias in Economics.” Economic Journal 127 (October): F236F265.Google Scholar
Doucouliagos, Hristos and Stanley, T. D.. 2009. “Publication Selection Bias in Minimum-Wage Research? A Meta-Regression Analysis.” British Journal of Industrial Relations 47 (2): 406428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doucouliagos, Hristos, Stanley, T. D. and Kip Viscusi, W.. 2014. “Publication Selection and the Income Elasticity of the Value of a Statistical Life.” Journal of Health Economics 33 (January): 6775.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Douven, Igor. 2011. “Abduction” and “Supplement to Abduction: Peirce on Abduction,The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2011 Edition), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). Scholar
Drazen, Jeffrey M. 2016. “Data Sharing and the Journal.” New England Journal of Medicine 374 (19): e24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dreber, Anna, Pfeiffer, Thomas, Almenberg, Johan, Isaksson, Siri, Wilson, Brad, Chen, Yiling, Nosek, Brian A. and Johannesson, Magnus. 2015. “Using Prediction Markets to Estimate the Reproducibility of Scientific Research.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, November, 201516179. doi:10.1073/pnas.1516179112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Druckman, James N. and Green, Donald P (eds). 2011. Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N., Green, Donald P., Kuklinski, James H. and Lupia, Arthur. 2006. “The Growth and Development of Experimental Research in Political Science.” American Political Science Review 100 (4): 627635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drukker, David M. and Wiggins, Vince. 2004. “Verifying the Solution from a Nonlinear Solver: A Case Study: Comment.” American Economic Review 94 (1): 397399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, W. E. B. 1937. “Southern Trauma: Review of Caste and Class in a Southern Town by John Dollard.” North Georgia Review 2: 910.Google Scholar
Duarte, José et al. 2015. “Political Diversity Will Improve Psychological Science.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 158.Google ScholarPubMed
Dube, Arindrajit, William Lester, T. and Reich, Michael. 2010. “Minimum Wage Effects Across State Borders: Estimates Using Contiguous Counties.” Review of Economics and Statistics 92 (4): 945964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duflo, Esther, Glennerster, Rachel and Kremer, Michael. 2007. “Chapter 61 Using Randomization in Development Economics Research: A Toolkit.” Pp. 38953962 in Paul Schultz, T. and Strauss, John A. (eds), Handbook of Development Economics. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Dumont, Clayton W. 2008. The Promise of Poststructuralist Sociology: Marginalized Peoples and the Problem of Knowledge. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Dunleavy, Patrick. 2014. “Poor Citation Practices are a Form of Academic Self-Harm in the Humanities and Social Sciences.” Blog post. Scholar
Dunning, Thad. 2012. Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-Based Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, Thad. 2016. “Transparency, Replication, and Cumulative Learning: What Experiments Alone Cannot Achieve.” Annual Review of Political Science 19: 541563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duvendack, Maren and Palmer-Jones, Richard. 2013. “Replication of Quantitative Work in Development Studies: Experiences and Suggestions.” Progress in Development Studies 13 (4): 307322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duvendack, Maren, Palmer-Jones, Richard and Reed, Robert W. 2015. “Replications in Economics: A Progress Report.” Economic Journal Watch 12 (2): 164191.Google Scholar
Dwork, Cynthia and Smith, Adam. 2010. “Differential Privacy for Statistics: What We Know and What We Want to Learn.” Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality 1 (2). Scholar
Easley, Richard W., Madden, Charles S. and Dunn, Mark G. 2000. “Conducting Marketing Science: The Role of Replication in the Research Process.” Journal of Business Research 48 (1): 8392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterbrook, Phillipa J., Gopalan, Ramana, Berlin, Jesse A. and Matthews, David R.. 1991. “Publication Bias in Clinical Research.” The Lancet, originally published as 337 (8746): 867872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Easterly, William, Levine, Ross and Roodman, David. 2004. “Aid, Policies, and Growth: Comment.” American Economic Review 94 (3): 774780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eble, Alex, Boone, Peter and Elbourne, Diana. 2014. “On Minimizing the Risk of Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials in Economics.” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2272141. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Scholar
Eden, Dov. 2002. “From the Editors: Replication, Meta-Analysis, Scientific Progress, and AMJ’s Publication Policy.” Academy of Management Journal 45: 841846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egger, Matthias, Davey-Smith, George and Altman, Douglas G (eds). 2001. Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context. London: BMJ Publishing Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eich, Eric. 2014. “Business Not as Usual.” Psychological Science 25 (1): 36. Scholar
Eidlin, Fred. 1983. “Area Studies and/or Social Science: Contextually-Limited Generalizations versus General Laws.” Pp. 199–216 in Eidlin, Fred (ed.), Constitutional Democracy: Essays in Comparative Politics. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Elkana, Yehuda, Lederberg, Joshua, Merton, Robert K., Thackray, Arnold and Zuckerman, Harriet. 1978. Towards a Metric of Science: The Advent of Science Indicators. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Ellison, Glenn. 2002. “The Slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process.” Journal of Political Economy 110 (5): 947993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elm, Erik von, Altman, Douglas G., Egger, Matthias, Pocock, Stuart J., Gøtzsche, Peter C. and Vandenbroucke, Jan P.. 2007. “The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies.” Preventive Medicine 45 (4): 247251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elman, Colin and Kapiszewski, Diana. 2014. “Data Access and Research Transparency in the Qualitative Tradition.” PS: Political Science and Politics 47 (1): 4347.Google Scholar
Ember, Carol and Hanisch, Robert. 2013. “Sustaining Domain Repositories for Digital Data: A White Paper, December 11.” doi:10.3886/SustainingDomainRepositoriesDigitalData.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enders, Walter and Hoover, Gary A.. 2004. “Whose Line Is It? Plagiarism in Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature 42 (2): 487493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enders, Walter and Hoover, Gary A.. 2006. “Plagiarism in the Economics Profession: A Survey.” Challenge 49 (5): 92107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epidemiology. 2010. “The Registration of Observational Studies – When Metaphors Go Bad.” Epidemiology, July, 1. doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181eafbcf.Google Scholar
Erikson, Martin G. and Erlandson, Peter. 2014. “A Taxonomy of Motives to Cite.” Social Studies of Science 44 (4): 625637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ertman, Thomas. 1997. Birth of the Leviathan: Building States and Regimes in Medieval and Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espeland, Wendy Nelson and Sauder, Michael. 2016. Engines of Anxiety: Academic Rankings, Reputation, and Accountability. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Etz, Alexander and Vandekerckhove, Joachim. 2016. “A Bayesian Perspective on the Reproducibility Project: Psychology.” PLoS ONE 11 (2): e0149794.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evangelou, Evangelos, Trikalinos, Thomas A. and Ioannidis, John P.. 2005. “Unavailability of Online Supplementary Scientific Information from Articles Published in Major Journals.” The FASEB Journal 19 (14): 19431944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Everett, Jim A. C. and Earp, Brian D.. 2016. “A Tragedy of the (Academic) Commons: Interpreting the Replication Crises in Psychology as a Social Dilemma for Early-Career Researchers.” Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1152.Google Scholar
Fairfield, Tasha. 2010. “Business Power and Tax Reform: Taxing Income and Profits in Chile and Argentina.Latin American Politics and Society 52 (2): 3771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairfield, Tasha. 2011. “Business Power and Protest: Argentina’s Agricultural Producers Protest in Comparative Context.” Studies in Comparative International Development 46 (4): 424–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairfield, Tasha. 2013. “Going Where the Money Is: Strategies for Taxing Economic Elites in Unequal Democracies.” World Development 47: 4257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairfield, Tasha. 2015. Private Wealth and Public Revenue in Latin America: Business Power and Tax Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairfield, Tasha and Charman, Andrew. 2015. “Bayesian Probability: The Logic of (Political) Science: Opportunities, Caveats and Guidelines.” Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 3–6, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Fairfield, Tasha and Charman, Andrew. 2017. “Explicit Bayesian Analysis for Process Tracing: Guidelines, Opportunities, and Caveats.” Political Analysis 25 (3): 363380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairfield, Tasha and Charman, Andrew. 2018. “A Bayesian Perspective on Case Selection.” Presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Boston, MA, August 30–September 2.Google Scholar
Fairfield, Tasha and Charman, Andrew. 2019. “The Bayesian Foundations of Iterative Research in Qualitative Social Science: A Dialogue with the Data.” Perspectives on Politics 17 (1): 154–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairfield, Tasha and Charman, Andrew. 2020. Social Inquiry and Bayesian Inference: Rethinking Qualitative Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fairfield, Tasha and Garay, Candelaria. 2017. “Redistribution under the Right in Latin America: Electoral Competition and Organized Actors in Policymaking,” Comparative Political Studies 50 (14): 18711906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falagas, Matthew E., Zarkali, Angeliki, Karageorgopoulos, Drosos E., Bardakas, Vangelis and Mavros, Michael N.. 2013. “The Impact of Article Length on the Number of Future Citations: A Bibliometric Analysis of General Medicine Journals.” PLoS ONE 8 (2): e49476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fanelli, Daniele. 2009. “How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data.” PLoS ONE 4 (5): e5738.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fanelli, Daniele. 2013. “Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign.” PLoS Medicine 10 (12): e1001563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fang, Ferric C. and Casadevall, Arturo. 2011. “Retracted Science and the Retraction Index.” Infection and Immunity 79 (10): 38553859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fann, Kuang Tih. 1970. Peirce’s Theory of Abduction. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faye, Cathy. 2012. “American Social Psychology: Examining the Contours of the 1970s Crisis.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (2): 514521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feak, Christine B. and Swales, John M.. 2009. Telling a Research Story: Writing a Literature Review. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feigenbaum, Susan and Levy, David M.. 1993. “The Market for (Ir)reproducible Econometrics.” Social Epistemology 7: 215232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldstein, Martin. 1974. “Social Security, Induced Retirement, and Aggregate Capital Accumulation.” Journal of Political Economy 82 (5): 905926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldstein, Martin. “Social Security and Private Saving: Reply.” Journal of Political Economy 90 (3): 630642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferber, Marianne A. and Brün, Michael. 2011. “The Gender Gap in Citations: Does It Persist?Feminist Economics 17 (1): 151158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferree, Myra Marx, Khan, Shamus and Morimoto, Shauna. 2007. “Assessing the Feminist Revolution: The Presence and Absence of Gender in Theory and Practice.” Pp. 438479 in Craig Calhoun (ed.), Sociology in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul. 1993. Against Method. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Fielding, Nigel. 2004. “Getting the Most from Archived Qualitative Data: Epistemological, Practical and Professional Obstacles.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 7 (1): 97104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fienberg, Stephen E., Martin, Margaret E. and Straf, Miron L. (eds). 1985. Sharing Research Data. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Findley, Michael G., Jensen, Nathan M., Malesky, Edmund J and Pepinsky, Thomas B.. 2016. “Can Results-Free Review Reduce Publication Bias? The Results and Implications of a Pilot Study.” Comparative Political Studies 49 (13): 16671703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, Günther, McConnell, Margaret and Vollmer, Sebastian. 2014. “Testing for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Experimental Data: False Discovery Risks and Correction Procedures.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 6 (1): 4457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, Eli, J., Eastwick, Paul W. and Reis, Harry T.. 2015. “Best Research Practices in Psychology: Illustrating Epistemological and Pragmatic Considerations with the Case of Relationship Science.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 108 (2): 275297.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, Amy, Taubman, Sarah, Wright, Bill, Bernstein, Mira, Gruber, Jonathan, Newhouse, Joseph P., Allen, Heidi and Baicker, Katherine. 2012. “The Oregon Health Insurance Experiment: Evidence from the First Year.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 127 (3): 10571106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finney, David. 1997. “The Responsible Referee.” Biometrics 53 (2): 715719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleischmann, Martin and Pons, Stanley. 1989. “Electrochemically Induced Nuclear Fusion of Deuterium.” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry and Interfacial Electrochemistry 261 (2): 301308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folbre, Nancy 1982. “Exploitation Comes Home: A Critique of the Marxian Theory of Family Labor.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 6 (4): 317329.Google Scholar
Food and Drug Administration. 1998. “Guidance for Industry: E9 Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials.” Scholar
Food and Drug Administration. n.d. “E9 Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials.” Guidance for Industry. Rockville, MD: Food and Drug Administration. Scholar
Foote, Christopher L. and Goetz, Christopher F.. 2008. “The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime: Comment (Report).” Quarterly Journal of Economics 123 (1): 407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forscher, Bernard. 1965. “Rules for Referees.” Science 150 (3694): 319321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fourcade-Gourinchas, Marion and Babb, Sarah. 2002. “The Rebirth of the Liberal Creed: Paths to Neoliberalism in Four Countries.” American Journal of Sociology 108: 533579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourcade, Marion. 2009. Economists and societies: Discipline and profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourcade, Marion and Healy, Kieran. 2016. “Seeing Like a Market.” Socio-Economic Review (December): 929.Google Scholar
Fourcade, Marion and Healy, Kieran. 2017. “Categories All the Way Down.” Historical Social Research 42 (1): 286296.Google Scholar
Fowler, Linda L. 1995. “Replication as Regulation.” PS: Political Science and Politics 28 (3): 478481.Google Scholar
Fox, Charles W., Timothy Paine, C. E. and Sauterey, Boris. 2016. “Citations Increase with Manuscript Length, Author Number, and References Cited in Ecology Journals.” Ecology and Evolution 6 (21): 77177726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franco, Annie, Malhotra, Neil and Simonovits, Gabor. 2014. “Publication Bias in the Social Sciences: Unlocking the File Drawer.” Science 345 (6203): 15021505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, Michael C. and Saxe, Rebecca. 2012. “Teaching Replication.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 7 (6): 600604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freese, Jeremy. 2007a. “Overcoming Objections to Open-Source Social Science.” Sociological Methods and Research 36 (2): 220226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freese, Jeremy. 2007b. “Replication Standards for Quantitative Social Science: Why Not Sociology?Sociological Methods and Research 36 (2): 153172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freese, Jeremy and Peterson, David. 2016. “The Emergence of Forensic Objectivity.” Scholar
Freese, Jeremy and Peterson, David. 2017. “Replication in Social Science.” Annual Review of Sociology 43 (1): 147165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freese, Jeremy and Peterson, David. 2018. “The Emergence of Statistical Objectivity.” Sociological Theory 36 (3): 289313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freese, Jeremy and Powell, Brian. 2001. “Commentary and Debate: Making Love Out of Nothing at All? Null Findings and the Trivers-Willard Hypothesis.” American Journal of Sociology 106 (6): 17761788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, René L., Frey, Bruno S and Eichenberger, Reiner. 1999. “A Case of Plagiarism.” Kyklos 52 (3): 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frickel, Scott. 2008. “On Missing New Orleans: Lost Knowledge and Knowledge Gaps in an Urban Hazardscape.” Environmental History 13: 643650.Google Scholar
Frickel, Scott and Gross, Neil. 2005. “A General Theory of Scientific/Intellectual Movements.” American Sociological Review 70 (2): 204232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, Eiko. 2018. “7 Sternberg Papers: 351 References, 161 Self-Citations.” March 29, 2018. Scholar
Frijters, Paul and Torgler, Benno. 2016. “Improving the Peer Review Process: A Proposed Market System.” Discussion paper No. 9894, IZA/The Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, Germany.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuess, Scott M., Jr. 1996. “On Replication in Business and Economics Research: The QJBE Case.” Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics 35 (2): 313.Google Scholar
Gaddis, John Lewis. 1989. The Long Peace: Inquiries into the History of the Cold War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Galbraith, Rex F. 1988. “A Note on Graphical Presentation of Estimated Odds Ratios from Several Clinical Trials.” Statistics in Medicine 7 (8): 889894.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galvan, Jose L. and Galvan, Melisa C.. 2017. Writing Literature Reviews: A guide for Students of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganimian, Alejandro. 2014. “Pre-Analysis Plan Template.” Template document. Harvard University. Scholar
Gans, Herbert J. 1992. “Sociological Amnesia: The Noncumulation of Normal Social Science.” Sociological Forum 7: 701710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gans, Joshua. 2017. Scholarly Publishing and its Discontents: An Economist’s Perspective on Dealing with Market Power and its Consequences. Toronto: Core Economic Research.Google Scholar
Garay, Candelaria. 2016. Social Policy Expansion in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García, Fernando Martel. 2016. “Replication and the Manufacture of Scientific Inferences: A Formal Approach.” International Studies Perspectives 17 (4): 408–425.Google Scholar
Garfield, E. 1955. “Citation Indexes for Science: A New Dimension in Documentation through Association of Ideas.” Science 122 (3159): 108111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gazni, Ali and Didegah, Fereshteh. 2011. “Investigating Different Types of Research Collaboration and Citation Impact: A Case Study of Harvard University’s Publications.” Scientometrics 87 (2): 251265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehlbach, Scott. 2015. “The Fallacy of Multiple Methods.” Comparative Politics Newsletter 25 (2): 1112.Google Scholar
Geller, Daniel S. and John A., Vasquez (eds). 2005. The Construction and Cumulation of Knowledge in International Relations. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew and Gross, Neil. 2015. “Political Attitudes in Social Environments.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 38: E114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelman, Andrew and Loken, Eric. 2013. “The Garden of Forking Paths: Why Multiple Comparisons Can Be a Problem, Even When There is No ‘Fishing Expedition’ or ‘p-Hacking’ and the Research Hypothesis Was Posited ahead of Time.” November. Scholar
Gelman, Andrew and Loken, Eric. 2014. “The Statistical Crisis in Science: Data-dependent Analysis – A “Garden of Forking Paths” – Explains Why Many Statistically Significant Comparisons Don’t Hold Up.” American Scientist 102 (6): 460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, Pasarica, Cristian and Dodhia, Rahul. 2002. “Let’s Practice What We Preach.” The American Statistician 56 (2): 121130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew and Stern, Hal. 2006. “The Difference between “Significant” and “Not Significant” is Not Itself Statistically Significant.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 60: 328331.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L. and Bennett, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan S. and Malhotra, Neil. 2008a. “Do Statistical Reporting Standards Affect What is Published? Publication Bias in Two Leading Political Science Journals.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 3: 313326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan S. and Malhotra, Neil. 2008b. “Publication Bias in Empirical Sociological Research: Do Arbitrary Significance Levels Distort Published Results?Sociological Methods and Research 37 (1): 330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., Green, Donald P. and Nickerson, David. 2001. “Testing for Publication Bias in Political Science.” Political Analysis 9 (4): 385392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., Malhotra, Neil, Dowling, Conor and Doherty, David. 2010. “Publication Bias in Two Political Behavior Literatures.” American Politics Research 38 (4): 591613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan, Arceneaux, Kevin, Boudreau, Cheryl, Dowling, Conor, Hillygus, Sunshine, Palfrey, Thomas, Biggers, Daniel R. and Hendry, David J. 2014. “Reporting Guidelines for Experimental Research: A Report from the Experimental Research Section Standards Committee.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 1 (1): 8198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerking, Shelby and Morgan, William E. 2007. “Effects of Environmental and Land Use Regulation in the Oil and Gas Industry Using the Wyoming Checkerboard as a Natural Experiment: Retraction.” American Economic Review 97 (3): 1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, John. 2012a. “Mere Description.” British Journal of Political Science 42 (04): 721746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, John. 2012b. Social Science Methodology: A Unified Framework. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 2017. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. 2d ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gerring, John and Cojocaru, Lee. 2016. “Arbitrary Limits to Scholarly Speech: Why (Short) Word Limits Should be Abolished.” Qualitative and Multi-Method Research: Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Organized Section on Qualitative and Multi-Method Research 14: 1/2 (Spring/Fall): 213.Google Scholar
Gertler, Aaron L. and Bullock, John G.. 2017. “Reference Rot: An Emerging Threat to Transparency in Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 50 (1): 166171.Google Scholar
Gherghina, Sergiu and Katsanidou, Alexia. 2013. “Data Availability in Political Science Journals.” European Political Science 12 (3): 333349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghiasi, Gita, Larivière, Vincent and Sugimoto, Cassidy R.. 2016. “Gender Differences in Synchronous and Diachronous Self-Citations.” In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators. Valencia, Spain: Editorial Universitat Politecnica de Valencia.Google Scholar
Gibler, Douglas M., Miller, Steven M. and Little, Erin K.. 2016. Analysis of the Militarized Interstate Dispute (MID) Dataset, 1816–2001. International Studies Quarterly 60 (December): 719730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gieryn, Thomas. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2015. “The Temporary Importance of Role Models for Women’s Political Representation.American Journal of Political Science 59 (4): 957970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, Christopher L. 1989. “LSE and the British Approach to Time Series Econometrics.” Oxford Economic Papers, New Series 41 (1): 108128.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Daniel T., King, Gary, Pettigrew, Stephen and Wilson, Timothy D.. 2016. “Comment on ‘Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science.’” Science 351 (6277): 1037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giner-Sorolla, Roger. 2012. “Science or Art? How Aesthetic Standards Grease the Way Through the Publication Bottleneck but Undermine Science.Perspectives on Psychological Science 7 (6): 562571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gingras, Y. 2016. Bibliometrics and Research Evaluation: Uses and Abuses. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginther, Donna K. and Kahn, Shulamit. 2004. “Women in Economics: Moving Up or Falling Off the Academic Career Ladder?Journal of Economic Perspectives 18 (3): 193214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glandon, Philip. 2010. “Report on the American Economic Review Data Availability Compliance Project.” Vanderbilt University. Scholar
Glaser, Barney and Strauss, Anselm. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Glass, Gene V., Smith, Mary Lee and McGaw, Barry. 1981. Meta-Analysis in Social Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Glennerster, Rachel and Takavarasha, Kudzai. 2013. Running Randomized Evaluations: A Practical Guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleser, Leon J. 1986. “Some Notes on Refereeing.” The American Statistician 40 (4): 310312.Google Scholar
Go, Julian. 2016. Postcolonial Thought and Social Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goertz, Gary. 2017. “Descriptive-Causal Generalizations: ‘Empirical Laws’ in the Social Sciences?” Pp. 85–108 in Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Kincaid, Harold (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary and Mahoney, James. 2012. “Concepts and Measurement: Ontology and Epistemology.Social Science Information 51 (2): 205216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday and Company.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Pinelopi Koujianou. 2016. “Report of the Editor: American Economic Review.” American Economic Review 106 (5): 700712.Google Scholar
Goldin, Claudia. 1992. Understanding the Gender Gap: An Economic History of American Women. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldin, Claudia. 2006. “The Quiet Revolution that Transformed Women’s Employment, Education, and Family.” American Economic Review 96 (2): 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldin, Claudia and Katz., Larry F. 2016. “A Most Egalitarian Profession: Pharmacy and the Evolution of a Family Friendly Occupation.” Journal of Labor Economics 34 (3): 705745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldin, Claudia and Katz., Larry F. 2011. “The Cost of Workplace Flexibility for High-Powered Professionals.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 638 (1): 4567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldin, Claudia, Katz, Lawrence F. and Kuziemko, Ilyana. 2006. “The Homecoming of American College Women: The Reversal of the Gender Gap in College.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20: 133156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Steven, Fanelli, Daniele and Ioannidis, John. 2016. “What Does Research Reproducibility Mean?Science Translational Medicine 8 (341): 16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gorg, Holger and Strobl, Eric. 2001. “Multinational Companies and Productivity Spillovers: A Meta-Analysis.” Economic Journal 111 (475): 723739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorski, Philip S. 2009. “Social ‘Mechanisms’ and Comparative-Historical Sociology: A Critical Realist Proposal.” Pp. 147194 in Hedström, Peter and Wittrock, Björn (eds), Frontiers of Sociology. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Gough, David and Elbourne, Diana. 2002. “Systematic Research Synthesis to Inform Policy, Practice, and Democratic Debate.” Social Policy and Society 1: 225236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, Ian. 2015. “The Political Economy of Prevention.” British Journal of Political Science 45 (02): 307327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouldner, Alvin. 1954. Patterns of Industrial Democracy. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Gouldner, Alvin and Peterson, Richard. 1962. Notes on Technology and the Moral Order. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Grant, Sean, Mayo-Wilson, Evan, Hopewell, Sally, Macdonald, Geraldine, Moher, David and Montgomery, Paul. 2013. “Developing a Reporting Guideline for Social and Psychological Intervention Trials.” Journal of Experimental Criminology 9 (3): 355367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Paul et al. 2007. The Research Imagination: An Introduction to Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Ronald H. et al. 2007. “Male Circumcision for HIV Prevention in Men in Rakai, Uganda: A Randomised Trial.” Lancet 369 (9562): 657666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenland, Sander. 2006. “Bayesian Perspectives for Epidemiological Research.” International Journal of Epidemiology (35): 765775.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, Anthony G. 1975. “Consequences of Prejudice against the Null Hypothesis.” Psychological Bulletin 82 (1): 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greve, Werner, Bröder, Arndt and Erdfelder, Edgar. 2013. “Result-Blind Peer Reviews and Editorial Decisions.” European Psychologist 18 (4) 286–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Neil. 2009. “A Pragmatist Theory of Social Mechanisms.” American Sociological Review 74: 358379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Neil. 2013. Why Are Professors Liberal and Why Do Conservatives Care? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Neil and Simmons, Solon (eds). 2014. Professors and Their Politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Guarino, Cassandra M. and Borden, Victor M. H.. 2017. “Faculty Service Loads and Gender: Are Women Taking Care of the Academic Family?Research in Higher Education 58 (6): 672694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunaratnam, Yasmin. 2003. Researching “Race” and Ethnicity: Methods, Knowledge and Power. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutzkow, Joshua, Lamont, Michèle and Mallard, Grégoire. 2004. “What is Originality in the Humanities and the Social Sciences?American Sociological Review 69: 190212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, Jacob and Pierson, Paul. 2002. “Business Power and Social Policy: Employers and the Formation of the American Welfare State.Politics and Society 30 (2): 277325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, Jacob and Pierson, Paul. 2010. “Winner-Take-All-Politics: Public Policy, Political Organization, and the Precipitous Rise of Top Incomes in the United States.” Politics and Society 38 (2): 152204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1983. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan and Kaufman, Robert R.. 2012. “Inequality and Regime Change: Democratic Transitions and the Stability of Democratic Rule.” American Political Science Review 106 (3): 495516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A. and Taylor, Rosemary C. R.. 1996. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.” Political Studies XLIV: 936957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamermesh, Daniel S. 2007. “Viewpoint: Replication in economics.” Canadian Journal of Economics 40: 715733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamermesh, Daniel S. 2018. “Citations in Economics: Measurement, Uses and Impacts.” Journal of Economic Literature 56 (1): 115156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hames, Irene. 2007. Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals: Guidelines for Good Practice. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammersley, Martyn. 2010. “Can We Re-Use Qualitative Data via Secondary Analysis? Notes on Some Terminological and Substantive Issues.” Sociological Research Online 15 (1): 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, Ange Marie. 2007. “When Multiplication Doesn’t Equal Quick Addition: Examining Intersectionality as a Research Paradigm.” Perspectives on Politics 5 (1): 6379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, Ange Marie. 2015. “Intersectionality’s Will toward Social Transformation.” New Political Science 37 (4): 620–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, Ange Marie. 2016. Intersectionality: An Intellectual History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handcock, Mark and Gile, Krista. 2011. “Comment: On the Concept of Snowball Sampling.” Sociological Methodology 41 (1): 367371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankins, Dorothy. 1929. “Current Research Projects.” American Journal of Sociology 35 (3): 445468.Google Scholar
Hansen, Peter Reinhard. 2005. “A Test for Superior Predictive Ability.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 23 (4): 365380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, Jonathan K. 2015. “Democracy and State Capacity: Complements or Substitutes?Studies in Comparative International Development 50 (3): 304330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 2005. “Negotiating with the Positivist Legacy: New Social Justice Movements and a Standpoint Politics of Method.” Pp. 346–365 in George Steinmetz (ed.), The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences: Positivism and Its Epistemological Others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Hardt, Heidi, Smith, Amy Erica, Kim, Hannah and Meister, Philippe. 2018. “The Gender Readings Gap in Political Science.” Presented at the Visions in Methodology Conference.Google Scholar
Hardt, Heidi, Smith, Amy Erica, Kim, Hannah and Meister, Philippe. 2019. “The Gender Readings Gap in Political Science Graduate Training.” Journal of Politics 81 (4): n. p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, Chris. 2018. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Research Imagination. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Hartman, Alexandra, Samii, Cyrus and Christensen, Darin. 2017. “A Qualitative Pre-Analysis Plan for Legible Institutions and Land Demand: The Effect of Property Rights Systems on Investment in Liberia.” October 20. Scholar
Hartman, Alexandra, Kern, Florian and Mellor, David T.. 2018. “Preregistration for Qualitative Research Template.” OSF. September 27.Google Scholar
Harvey, Campbell R., Liu, Yan and Zhu, Heqing. 2015. “And the Cross-Section of Expected Returns.” Review of Financial Studies (October): hhv059.Google Scholar
Harzing, A. W. 2007. Publish or Perish, available at Scholar
Hauser, Robert M. 1987. “Sharing Data – It’s Time for ASA Journals to Follow the Folkways of a Scientific Sociology.” American Sociological Review 52 (6): vi–viii.Google Scholar
Haustein, Stefanie, Peters, Isabella, Sugimoto, Cassidy R., Thelwall, Mike and Larivière, Vincent. 2014. “Tweeting Biomedicine: An Analysis of Tweets and Citations in the Biomedical Literature.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65 (4): 656669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haustein, Stefanie, Costas, Rodrigo and Larivière, Vincent. 2015. “Characterizing Social Media Metrics of Scholarly Papers: The Effect of Document Properties and Collaboration Patterns.” PLoS ONE 10 (3): e0120495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Havranek, Tomas andIrsova, Zuzana. 2012. “Survey Article: Publication Bias in the Literature on Foreign Direct Investment Spillovers.” Journal of Development Studies 48 (10): 13751396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Carlee Beth, Fitzgerald, Cailey E. and Nosek, Brian A.. 2015. “In Search of an Association Between Conception Risk and Prejudice.” Psychological Science 26 (2): 249252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, Wayland. 1942. “An Exploratory Study of Objectives for Introductory Sociology.Social Forces 21 (2): 165172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Headworth, Spencer and Freese, Jeremy. 2016. “Credential Privilege or Cumulative Advantage? Prestige, Productivity, and Placement in the Academic Sociology Job Market.” Social Forces 94: 12571282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Health Research Council (HRC). 2016. Health Research Council of New Zealand. Downloaded on September 22, 2016 from Scholar
Healy, Kieran and Moody, James. 2014. “Data Visualization in Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology 40: 105128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heaton, Janet. 2008. “Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Data: An Overview.” Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung 33 (3 (125)): 3345.Google Scholar
Hedges, Larry V. 1992. “Modeling Publication Selection Effects in Meta-Analysis.” Statistical Science 7 (2): 246255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedges, Larry V. and Vevea, Jack L. 1996. “Estimating Effect Size Under Publication Bias: Small Sample Properties and Robustness of a Random Effects Selection Model.” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 21 (4): 299332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedström, Peter. 2005. Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heffetz, Ori and Ligett, Katrina. 2014. “Privacy and Data-Based Research.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 28 (2): 7598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrix, Cullen. 2015. “Google Scholar Metrics and Scholarly Productivity in International Relations.” Guest post on Duck of Minerva. Scholar
Hendry, David F. 1987. “Econometric Methodology: A Personal Perspective.” Pp. 29–48 in Truman Bewley (ed.), Advances in Econometrics: Volume 2: Fifth World Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hendry, David F. 1995. Dynamic Econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heneberg, Petr. 2016. “From Excessive Journal Self-Cites to Citation Stacking: Analysis of Journal Self-Citation Kinetics in Search for Journals, Which Boost Their Scientometric Indicators.” PloS ONE 11 (4): e0153730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hengel, Erin. 2017. “Publishing while Female. Are Women Held to Higher Standards? Evidence from Peer Review.” Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1753, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Henrich, Joseph, Heine, Steven J. and Norensayan, Ara. 2010. “The Weirdest People in the World?Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33: 61135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henry, Emeric. 2009. “Strategic Disclosure of Research Results: The Cost of Proving Your Honesty.” Economic Journal 119 (539): 10361064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, Emeric and Ottaviani, Marco. 2014. “Research and the Approval Process: The Organization of Persuasion.” American Economic Review 109 (3): 911–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbst, Jeffrey. 2000. States and Power in Africa: Comparative Lessons in Authority and Control. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Herndon, Thomas, Ash, Michae and Pollin, Robert. 2014. “Does High Public Debt Consistently Stifle Economic Growth? A Critique of Reinhart and Rogoff.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 38 (2): 257279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, John K. 2012. “Editorial Policy on Candidate Gene Association and Candidate Gene-by-Environment Interaction Studies of Complex Traits.” Behavior Genetics 42: 12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hicks, Diana. 1999. “The Difficulty of Achieving Full Coverage of International Social Science Literature and the Bibliometric Consequences.” Scientometrics 44 (2): 193215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, Joan Hamory, Kremer, Michael and Miguel, Edward. 2015. “Commentary: Deworming Externalities and Schooling Impacts in Kenya: A Comment on Aiken Et al. (2015) and Davey Et al. (2015).” International Journal of Epidemiology 44 (5): 15931596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Barry T. 2004. “Reconsidering Union Wage Effects: Surveying New Evidence on an Old Topic.” Journal of Labor Research 25 (2): 233266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirshleifer, Sarojini, McKenzie, David, Almeida, Rita and Ridao-Cano, Cristobal. 2015. “The Impact of Vocational Training for the Unemployed: Experimental Evidence from Turkey.” Economic Journal, June, n/a-n/a. doi:10.1111/ecoj.12211.Google Scholar
Hix, Simon. 2004. “A Global Ranking of Political Science Departments.” Political Studies Review 2 (3): 293313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie. 1969. “The Ambassador’s Wife: An Exploratory Study.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 31: 7387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie. 1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie. 2016. Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie. 2017. Email on exploratory studies. February 17.Google Scholar
Hodson, Simon. 2016. “Sustainable Business Models for Data Repositories.” RDA Plenary, Tokyo, March 3. Scholar
Hoeffler, Jan H. 2013. “Teaching Replication in Quantitative Empirical Economics.” World Economics Association (WEA), Conference on the Economics Curriculum: Towards a Radical Reformation: May 331.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard and Metzger, Walter. 1955. The Development of Academic Freedom in the United States. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Holm, Sture. 1979. “A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure.” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6 (2): 6570.Google Scholar
Hook, Jennifer. 2017. “Women’s Housework: New Tests of Time and Money.” Journal of Marriage and Family 79 (1): 179198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopf, Ted and Allan, Bentley B (eds). 2016. Making Identity Count: Building a National Identity Database. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Michael C., Stam, Allan C. and Ellis, Cali M.. 2015. Why Leaders Fight. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie Russell and Machung, Anne. 1989. The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Hoxby, Caroline M. 2000. “Does Competition among Public Schools Benefit Students and Taxpayers?” American Economic Review 90 (5): 1209–1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoxby, Caroline M. 2007. “Does Competition among Public Schools Benefit Students and Taxpayers? A Reply.” American Economic Review 97 (5): 20382055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, John. 2007. “Be Known by the Company You Keep: Citations – Quality or Chance?Scientometrics 71 (2): 231238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hug, Sven E. and Brändle, Martin P.. 2017. “The Coverage of Microsoft Academic: Analyzing the Publication Output of a University.” Scientometrics 113: 1551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hug, Sven E., Ochsner, Michael and Brändle, Martin P.. 2017. “Citation Analysis with Microsoft Academic.” Scientometrics 111: 371378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Everett C. 1949. “Review of John Dollard, Caste and Class in a Southern Town.” American Journal of Sociology 55 (2): 20709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Everett C. 1960. “Introduction: The Place of Field Work in Social Science”. Pp. iiixiii in Buford Junker (ed.), Field Work: An Introduction to the Social Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hui, Victoria. 2005. War and State Formation in Ancient China and Early Modern Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, Macartan and Jacobs, Alan M.. 2015. “Mixing Methods: A Bayesian Approach.” American Political Science Review 109 (4): 653673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, Macartan and Jacobs, Alan M.. 2021. Integrated Inferences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Humphreys, Macartan, de la Sierra, Raul Sanchez and van der Windt, Peter. 2013. “Fishing, Commitment, and Communication: A Proposal for Comprehensive Nonbinding Research Registration.” Political Analysis 21 (1): 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hung, H. M. James, O’Neill, Robert T., Bauer, Peter and Kohne, Karl. 1997. “The Behavior of the P-Value When the Alternative Hypothesis Is True.” Biometrics 53 (1): 1122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunt, Morton. 1997. How Science Takes Stock: The Story of Meta-Analysis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Hunter, Douglas. 1984. Political/Military Applications of Bayesian Analysis. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Hunter, John E. 2001. “The Desperate Need for Replications.” Journal of Consumer Research 28 (1): 149158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husereau, Don, Drummond, Michael, Petrou, Stavros, Carswell, Chris, Moher, David, Greenberg, Dan, Augustovski, Federico et al. 2013. “Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) Statement.” Value in Health: Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research 16 (2): e1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huth, Paul and Russett, Bruce. 1984. “What Makes Deterrence Work? Cases from 1900 to 1980.” World Politics 36 (July): 496526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huth, Paul and Russett, Bruce. 1990. “Testing Deterrence Theory: Rigor Makes a Difference.” World Politics 42 (July): 466501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Herbert. 1991. Taking Society’s Measure: A Personal History of Survey Research. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Hymes, Kenneth B. et al. 1981. “Kaposi’s Sarcoma in Homosexual Men – a Report of Eight Cases.” The Lancet 318 (8247): 598600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ifcher, John and Zarghamee, Homa. 2011. “Happiness and Time Preference: The Effect of Positive Affect in a Random-Assignment Experiment.” American Economic Review 101 (7): 31093129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Igo, Sarah. 2011. “Subjects of Persuasion: Survey Research as a Solicitous Science, or, The Public Relations of the Polls.” Pp. 285306 in Camic, Charles, Gross, Neil and Lamont, Michèle (eds), Social Knowledge in the Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR). 2017. “Data Citations.” Scholar
International Consortium of Investigators for Fairness in Trial Data Sharing. 2016. “Toward Fairness in Data Sharing.” New England Journal of Medicine 375 (5): 405407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioannidis, John P. A. 2005. “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False.” PLoS Medicine 2 (8): e124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ioannidis, John P. A. 2008. “Effectiveness of Antidepressants: An Evidence Myth Constructed from a Thousand Randomized Trials?Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 3 (1): 14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ioannidis, John P., Greenland, Sander, Hlatky, Mark A., Khoury, Muin J., Macleod, Malcolm R., Moher, David, Schulz, Kenneth F. and Tibshirani, Robert. 2014. “Increasing Value and Reducing Waste in Research Design, Conduct, and Analysis.” The Lancet 383 (9912): 166175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Irwin, Sarah and Winterton, Mandy. 2012. “Qualitative Secondary Analysis and Social Explanation.” Sociological Research Online 17 (2): 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaac, Jeffrey C. 2015. “For a More Public Political Science.” Perspectives on Politics 13 (2): 269283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. 1988. “Randomised Trial of Intravenous Streptokinase, Oral Aspirin, Both, Or Neither Among 17 187 Cases Of Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction: ISIS-2.” The Lancet, originally published as 2 (8607): 349360.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben and Rosenbluth, Frances. 2006. “The Political Economy of Gender: Explaining Cross-National Variation in the Gender Division of Labor and the Gender Voting Gap.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (1): 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackman, Simon and Western, Bruce. 1994. “Bayesian Inference for Comparative Research.” American Political Science Review 88 (2) :412423.Google Scholar
Jackson, Michelle and Cox, D. R. 2013. “The Principles of Experimental Design and their Application in Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology 39: 2749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Jerry A. 2004. “Presidential Address: The Faculty Time Divide.Sociological Forum 19 (1): 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahoda, Marie and Cook, Stuart. 1952. “Security Measures and Freedom of Thought: An Exploratory Study of the Impact of Loyalty and Security Programs.” The Yale Law Journal 61 (3): 295333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahoda, Marie, Morton Deutsch and Stuart Cook. 1951. Research Methods in Social Relations with Especial Reference to Prejudice. 2 vols. New York: the Dryden Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janis, Irving. 1982. Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Jann, Ben. 2005. “Comment: Earnings Returns to Education in Urban China: A Note on Testing Differences among Groups.” American Sociological Review 70 (5): 860864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janz, Nicole. 2016. “Bringing the Gold Standard into the Classroom: Replication in University Teaching.” International Studies Perspectives 17 (4): 392–407.Google Scholar
Jaschik, Scott. 2012. “Moving Further to the Left.”, October 24. Scholar
Jaynes, Edwin T. 2003. Probability Theory: The Logic of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensenius, Francesca R., Htun, Mala, Samuels, David J., Singer, David A., Lawrence, Adria and Chwe, Michael. 2018. “The Benefits and Pitfalls of Google Scholar.” PS: Political Science and Politics 51 (4): 820–824.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jewett, Andrew. 2012. Science, Democracy, and the American University: From the Civil War to the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joas, Hans. 1993. Pragmatism and Social Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
John, Leslie K., Loewenstein, George and Prelec, Drazen. 2012. “Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling.” Psychological Science 23 (5): 524532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, James. 2003. “Conceptual Problems as Obstacles to Progress in Political Science: Four Decades of Political Culture Research.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 15 (1): 87115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Lisa R., Carlson, Jake, Hudson-Vitale, Cynthia, Imker, Heidi, Kozlowski, Wendy A., Olendorf, Robert and Stewart, Claire. 2017. “Data Curation Network: A Cross-Institutional Staffing Model for Curating Research Data.” Scholar
Johnston, Lisa (ed.). 2016. Curating Research Data. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries.Google Scholar
Jung, Courtney. 2015. Lactivism: How Feminists and Fundamentalists, Hippies and Yuppies, and Physicians and Politicians made Breastfeeding Big Business and Bad Policy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Jung, Kiju, Shavitt, Sharon, Viswanathan, Madhu and Hilbe, Joseph M.. 2014. “Female Hurricanes Are Deadlier than Male Hurricanes.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (24): 87828787.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jussim, Lee. 2016. “Are Most Published Social Psychology Findings False?Heterodox Academy. Scholar
Kagel, John H. and Alvin E., Roth (eds). 2016. The Handbook of Experimental Economics, Volume 2: The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, S. 1993. “Gender Differences in Academic Career Paths of Economists.” American Economic Review 83 (2): 5256.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. 2012. “A Proposal to Deal with Questions about Priming Effects.” Nature.!/suppinfoFile/Kahneman%20Letter.pdf.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. 2014. “A New Etiquette for Replication.” Social Psychology 45 (4): 310.Google Scholar
Kanazawa, Satoshi. 2001. “Comment: Why We Love Our Children.” American Journal of Sociology 106 (6): 17611776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, Edward J. 1984. “Why Journal Editors Should Encourage the Replication of Applied Econometric Research.” Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics 23 (1): 38.Google Scholar
Kapiszewski, Diana. 2012. High Courts and Economic Governance in Argentina and Brazil. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapiszewski, Diana, Maclean, Lauren M. and Read, Benjamin L.. 2015. Field Research in Political Science: Practices and Principles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karabag, Solmaz Filiz and Berggren, Christian. 2012. “Retraction, Dishonesty and Plagiarism: Analysis of a Crucial Issue for Academic Publishing, and the Inadequate Responses from Leading Journals in Economics and Management Disciplines.” Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research 2 (4): 172183.Google Scholar
Karcher, Sebastian and Pagé, Christiane. 2017. “Workshop Report: CAQDAS Projects and Digital Repositories’ Best Practices.” D-Lib Magazine 23 (3/4). doi:10.1045/march2017-karcher.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karcher, Sebastian and Steinberg, David A.. 2013. “Assessing the Causes of Capital Account Liberalization: How Measurement Matters.” International Studies Quarterly 57 (1): 128137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karcher, Sebastian, Kirilova, Dessislava and Weber, Nicholas. 2016. “Beyond the Matrix: Repository Services for Qualitative Data.” IFLA Journal 42 (4): 292302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karl, Terry. 1997. The Paradox of Plenty. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Daniel. 1955. “Review of Berelson, Lazarsfeld and McPhee, Voting.” Public Opinion Quarterly 19: 326328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Larry, Duflo, Esther, Goldberg, Pinelopi and Thomas, Duncan. 2013. “AEA E-Mail Announcement.” American Economic Association. Scholar
Kaufman, Robert. 2009. “The Political Effects of Inequality in Latin America: Some Inconvenient Facts.” Comparative Politics 41 (3): 359379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, Patricia. 1957. “Appendix C: Note on Significance Tests”. Pp. 301305 in Merton, Robert K., Reader, George and Kendall, Patricia (eds), The Student-Physician. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kern, Florian G. and Gleditsch, Kristian. 2017. “Exploring Pre-registration and Pre-analysis Plans for Qualitative Inference.” Unpublished working paper. Available online at Scholar
Khanna, Kabir and Imai, Kosuke. 2017. “Wru: Who are you? Bayesian Prediction of Racial Category using Surname and Geolocation.” Scholar
Kidwell, Mallory C., Lazarević, Ljiljana B., Baranski, Erica, Hardwicke, Tom E., Piechowski, Sarah, Falkenberg, Lina-Sophia, Kennett, Curtis et al. 2016. “Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency.” PLoS Biology 14 (5): e1002456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kier, Elizabeth. 1997. Imagining War: French and British Military Doctrine Between the Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kincaid, Harold. 1990. “Defending Laws in the Social Sciences.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 20 (1): 5683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary. 1995. “Replication, Replication.” PS: Political Science and Politics 28 (03): 444452.Google Scholar
King, Gary. 2006. “Publication, Publication.” PS: Political Science and Politics 39 (1): 119125.Google Scholar
King, Gary. 2014. “Restructuring the Social Sciences: Reflections from Harvard’s Institute for Quantitative Social Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 47 (1): 165–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Molly M., Bergstrom, Carl T, Correll, Shelley J, Jacquet, Jennifer and West, Jevin D.. 2017. “Men Set their Own Cites High: Gender and Self-Citation across Fields and over Time.” Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World 3 (December): 237802311773890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirsch, Irving, Deacon, Brett J., Huedo-Medina, Tania B., Scoboria, Alan, Moore, Thomas J. and Johnson, Blair T.. 2008. “Initial Severity and Antidepressant Benefits: A Meta-Analysis of Data Submitted to the Food and Drug Administration.” PLoS Medicine 5 (2). ScholarPubMed
Klein, Daniel and Western, Andrew. 2004–2005. “Voter Registration of Berkeley and Stanford Faculty.” Academic Questions 18: 5365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Joshua R. and Roodman, Aaron. 2005. “Blind Analysis in Nuclear and Particle Physics.” Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 55 (1): 141163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Richard A., Ratliff, Kate A., Vianello, Michelangelo, Adams, Reginald B., Bahník, Štěpán, Bernstein, Michael J., Bocian, Konrad et al. 2014. “Investigating Variation in Replicability.” Social Psychology 45 (3): 142152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinberg, Jon, Lakkaraju, Himabindu, Leskovec, Jure, Ludwig, Jens and Mullainathan, Sendhil. 2015. “Human Decisions and Machine Problems.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Kleinberg, Jon, Ludwig, Jens, Mullainathan, Sendhil and Obermeyer, Ziad. 2015. “Prediction Policy Problems.” American Economic Review 105 (5): 491495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kling, Jeffrey R., Liebman, Jeffrey B. and Katz, Lawrence F.. 2007. “Experimental Analysis of Neighborhood Effects.” Econometrica 75 (1): 83119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knell, Markus and Stix, Helmut. 2005. “The Income Elasticity of Money Demand: A Meta-Analysis of Empirical Results.” Journal of Economic Surveys 19 (3): 513533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knittel, Christopher R. and Metaxoglou, Konstantinos. 2011. “Challenges in Merger Simulation Analysis.” American Economic Review 101 (3): 5659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knittel, Christopher R. and Metaxoglou, Konstantinos. 2013. “Estimation of Random-Coefficient Demand Models: Two Empiricists’ Perspective.” Review of Economics and Statistics 96 (1): 3459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knobloch-Westerwick, Silvia and Glynn, Carroll J. 2013. “The Matilda Effect – Role Congruity Effects on Scholarly Communication: A Citation Analysis of Communication Research and Journal of Communication Articles.” Communication Research 40 (1): 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, J. Gary and Cole, Ardra (eds). 2008. Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Knuth, Donald Ervin. 1992. Literate Programming. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Koenker, Roger and Zeileis, Achim. 2009. “On Reproducible Econometric Research.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 24 (5): 833847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koole, Sander L. and Lakens, Daniel. 2012. “Rewarding Replications: A Sure and Simple Way to Improve Psychological Science.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 7 (6): 608614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kovesdy, Csaba P. and Kalantar-Zadeh, Kamyar. 2012. “Observational Studies versus Randomized Controlled Trials: Avenues to Causal Inference in Nephrology.” Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease 19 (1): 1118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kratz, John and Strasser, Carly. 2014. “Data Publication Consensus and Controversies.” F1000Research, October. doi:10.12688/f1000research.3979.3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ku, G., Wang, C. S. and Galinsky, A. D.. 2010. “Perception through a Perspective-Taking Lens: Differential Effects on Judgments and Behavior.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46: 792798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kunce, Mitch, Gerking, Shelby