Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T20:16:22.453Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 5 - Sperm DNA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2022

David Mortimer
Affiliation:
Oozoa Biomedical Inc., Vancouver
Lars Björndahl
Affiliation:
Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm
Christopher L. R. Barratt
Affiliation:
University of Dundee
José Antonio Castilla
Affiliation:
HU Virgen de las Nieves, Granada
Roelof Menkveld
Affiliation:
Stellenbosch University, South Africa
Ulrik Kvist
Affiliation:
Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm
Juan G. Alvarez
Affiliation:
Centro ANDROGEN, La Coruña
Trine B. Haugen
Affiliation:
Oslo Metropolitan University
Get access

Summary

Discusses the origins and detection of sperm DNA fragmentation, including cliniCal indications for such testing. Provides methods for a range of common techniques for assessimg sperm DNA fragmentation that are structured as standard operating procedures (SOPs) for easy use at the bench, inclding the TUNEL assay, Comet assay, and the sperm chromatin dispersion test (Halosperm test).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Schlegel, PN, Sigman, M, Collura, B, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of infertility in men: AUA/ASRM guideline part I. Fertil Steril 2021; 115: 5461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aitken, RJ, Bakos, HW. Should we be measuring DNA damage in human spermatozoa? New light on an old question. Hum Reprod 2021; 36: 1175–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esteves, SC, Zini, A, Coward, RM, et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation testing: summary evidence and clinical practice recommendations. Andrologia 2020; 53: e13874.Google ScholarPubMed
Evenson, D. DNA Damage: sperm chromatin structure assay. Sperm chromatin structure assay test on its fortieth anniversary. In: Agarwal, A, Henkel, R, Majzoub, A, eds. Manual of Sperm Function Testing in Human Assisted Reproduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021, 192201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubes, J, Selevan, SG, Sram, RJ, et al. GSTM1 genotype influences the susceptibility of men to sperm DNA damage associated with exposure to air pollution. Mutat Res 2007; 625: 20–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steele, EK, McClure, N, Maxwell, RJ, Lewis, SE. A comparison of DNA damage in testicular and proximal epididymal spermatozoa in obstructive azoospermia. Mol Hum Reprod 1999; 5: 831–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, SEM, O’Connell, M, Stevenson, M, et al. An algorithm to predict pregnancy in assisted conception. Mol Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 1385–90.Google Scholar
Greco, E, Scarselli, F, Iacobelli, M, et al. Efficient treatment of infertility due to sperm DNA damage by ICSI with testicular spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 226–30.Google Scholar
Ollero, M, Gil-Guzman, E, Lopez, MC, et al. Characterization of subsets of human spermatozoa at different stages of maturation: implications in the diagnosis and treatment of male infertility. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 1912–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suganuma, R, Yanagimachi, R, Meistricht, M. Decline in fertility of mouse sperm with abnormal chromatin during epididymal passage as revealed by ICSI. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 3101–8.Google Scholar
Cui, J, Holmes, EH, Greene, TG, Liu, PK. Oxidative DNA damage precedes DNA fragmentation after experimental stroke in rat brain. FASEB J 2000; 14: 955–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sergerie, M, Laforest, G, Bujan, L, et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation: threshold value in male fertility. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 3446–51.Google Scholar
Evenson, DP, Jost, LK, Marshall, D, et al. Utility of the sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the human fertility clinic. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 1039–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernández, JL, Muriel, L, Rivero, MT, et al. The sperm chromatin dispersion test: a simple method for the determination of sperm DNA fragmentation. J Androl 2003 24: 5966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández, JL, Muriel, L, Goyanes, V, et al. Simple determination of human sperm DNA fragmentation with an improved sperm chromatin dispersion test. Fertil Steril 2005; 84: 833–42.Google Scholar
Enciso, M, Sarasa, J, Agarwal, A, et al. A two-tailed Comet assay for assessing DNA damage in spermatozoa. Reprod Biomed Online 2009; 18: 609–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernandez, JL, Vazquez-Gundin, F, Delgado, A, et al. DNA breakage detection-FISH (DBD-FISH) in human spermatozoa: technical variants evidence different structural features. Mutat Res 2000; 453: 7782.Google Scholar
Manicardi, GC, Bianchi, PG, Pantano, S, et al. Presence of endogenous nicks in DNA of ejaculated human spermatozoa and its relationship to chromomycin A3 accessibility. Biol Reprod 1995; 52: 864–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, NP, MacCoy, MT, Tice, RR, Schneider, EL. A simple technique for quantification of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp Cell Res 1998; 175: 184–91.Google Scholar
Singh, N., Danner, D, Tice, R, et al. Abundant alkali-sensitive sites in DNA of human and mouse sperm. Exp Cell Res 1989; 184: 461–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gorczyca, W, Gong, J, Darzynkiewicz, Z. Detection of DNA strand breaks in individual apoptotic cells by the in situ terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase and nick translation assays. Cancer Res 1993; 53: 945–51.Google Scholar
Duran, EH, Morshedi, M, Taylor, S, Oehninger, S. Sperm DNA quality predicts intrauterine insemination outcome: a prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 3122–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alvarez, JG. Efficient treatment of infertility due to sperm DNA damage by ICSI with testicular spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 2031–2.Google Scholar
Borini, A, Tarozzi, N, Bizarro, D, et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation: paternal effect on early post-implantation embryo development in ART. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 2876–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muriel, L, Meseguer, M, Fernandez, JL, et al. Value of the sperm chromatin dispersion test in predicting pregnancy outcome in intrauterine insemination: a blind prospective study. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 738–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Negoescu, A, Guillermet, C, Lorimier, P, et al. Importance of DNA fragmentation in apoptosis with regard to TUNEL specificity. Biomed Pharmacother 1998; 52: 252–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evenson, DP, Djira, G, Kasperson, K, Christianson, J. Relationships between the age of 25,445 men attending infertility clinics and sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA®) defined sperm DNA and chromatin integrity. Fertil Steril 2020; 114: 311–20.Google Scholar
Jerre, E, Bungum, M, Evenson, D, Giwercman, A. Sperm chromatin structure assay high DNA stainability sperm as a marker of early miscarriage after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 2019; 112: 4653.Google Scholar
Wyrobek, AJ, Eskenazi, B, Young, S, et al. Advancing age has differential effects on DNA damage, chromatin integrity, gene mutations, and aneuploidies in sperm. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2006; 103: 9601–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alvarez, JG, Ollero, M, Larson-Cook, KL, Evenson, DP. Selecting cryopreserved semen for assisted reproductive techniques based on the level of sperm nuclear DNA fragmentation resulted in pregnancy. Fertil Steril 2004; 81: 712–13.Google Scholar
Werthman, P, Wixon, R, Kasperson, K, Evenson, DP. Significant decrease in sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation after varicocelectomy. Fertil Steril 2007; 90: 1800–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Roque, M, Esteves, SC. Effect of varicocele repair on sperm DNA fragmentation: a review. Int Urol Nephrol 2018; 50: 583603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casanovas, A, Ribas-Maynou, J, Lara-Cerrillo, S, et al. Double-stranded sperm DNA damage is a cause of delay in embryo development and can impair implantation rates. Fertil Steril 2019; 111: 699707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon, L, Aston, KI, Emery, BR, et al. Sperm DNA damage output parameters measured by the alkaline Comet assay and their importance. Andrologia 2017; 49. https://doi.org/10.1111/and.12608CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon, L, Proutski, I, Stevenson, M, et al. Sperm DNA damage has a negative association with live-birth rates after IVF. Reprod Biomed Online 2013; 26: 6878.Google Scholar
Sakkas, D, Alvarez, JG. Sperm DNA fragmentation: mechanisms of origin, impact on reproductive outcome, and analysis. Fertil Steril 2010; 93: 1027–36.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×