Gardosi, J, Chang, A, Kalyan, B, Sahota, D, Symonds, EM. Customised antenatal growth charts. Lancet 1992; 339(8788):283–7.Google Scholar

Pilliod, RA, Cheng, YW, Snowden, JM, Doss, AE, Caughey, AB. The risk of intrauterine fetal death in the small-for-gestational-age fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;207(4):318.e1, 318.e6.Google Scholar

Gardosi, J, Madurasinghe, V, Williams, M, Malik, A, Francis, A. Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth: Population based study. BMJ 2013;346:f108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McIntire, DD, Bloom, SL, Casey, BM, Leveno, KJ. Birth weight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants. N Engl J Med 1999;340(16):1234–8.Google Scholar

Henriksen, T. The macrosomic fetus: A challenge in current obstetrics. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008;87(2):134–45.Google Scholar

Zhang, X, Decker, A, Platt, RW, Kramer, MS. How big is too big? The perinatal consequences of fetal macrosomia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198(5):517.e1, 517.e6.Google Scholar

Glinianaia, SV, Rankin, J, Pearce, MS, Parker, L, Pless-Mulloli, T. Stillbirth and infant mortality in singletons by cause of death, birthweight, gestational age and birthweight-for-gestation, Newcastle upon Tyne 1961–2000. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2010;24(4):331–42.Google Scholar

Vangen, S, Stoltenberg, C, Skjaerven, R, Magnus, P, Harris, JR, Stray-Pedersen, B. The heavier the better? Birthweight and perinatal mortality in different ethnic groups. Int J Epidemiol 2002;31(3):654–60.Google Scholar

Francis, JH, Permezel, M, Davey, MA. Perinatal mortality by birthweight centile. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2014;54(4):354–9.Google Scholar

Moraitis, AA, Wood, AM, Fleming, M, Smith, GC. Birth weight percentile and the risk of term perinatal death. Obstet Gynecol 2014;124(2 Pt 1):274–83.Google Scholar

Vasak, B, Koenen, SV, Koster, MP, Hukkelhoven, CW, Franx, A, Hanson, MA, Visser, GH. Human fetal growth is constrained below optimal for perinatal survival. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;45(2):162–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jarvis, S, Glinianaia, SV, Torrioli, MG, et al. Cerebral palsy and intrauterine growth in single births: European collaborative study. Lancet 2003;362(9390):1106–11.Google Scholar

Houle, B, Clark, SJ, Kahn, K, Tollman, S, Yamin, A. The impacts of maternal mortality and cause of death on children’s risk of dying in rural South Africa: Evidence from a population based surveillance study (1992–2013). Reprod Health 2015;12 Suppl 1:S7,4755-12-S1-S7. Epub 2015 May 6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Moucheraud, C, Worku, A, Molla, M, Finlay, JE, Leaning, J, Yamin, A. Consequences of maternal mortality on infant and child survival: A 25-year longitudinal analysis in Butajira Ethiopia (1987–2011). Reprod Health 2015;12 Suppl 1:S4,4755-12-S1-S4. Epub 2015 May 6.Google Scholar

Morales-Rosello, J, Khalil, A, Morlando, M, Papageorghiou, A, Bhide, A, Thilaganathan, B. Changes in fetal Doppler indices as a marker of failure to reach growth potential at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;43(3):303–10.Google Scholar

Akolekar, R, Syngelaki, A, Gallo, DM, Poon, LC, Nicolaides, KH. Umbilical and fetal middle cerebral artery Doppler at 35–37 weeks’ gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;46(1):82–92.Google Scholar

Barker, DJ, Winter, PD, Osmond, C, Margetts, B, Simmonds, SJ. Weight in infancy and death from ischaemic heart disease. Lancet 1989;2(8663):577–80.Google Scholar

Barker, DJ. Fetal origins of coronary heart disease. BMJ 1995;311(6998):171–4.Google Scholar

Lawlor, DA, Ronalds, G, Clark, H, Smith, GD, Leon, DA. Birth weight is inversely associated with incident coronary heart disease and stroke among individuals born in the 1950s: Findings from the Aberdeen Children of the 1950s prospective cohort study. Circulation 2005;112(10):1414–18.Google Scholar

Osmond, C, Kajantie, E, Forsen, TJ, Eriksson, JG, Barker, DJ. Infant growth and stroke in adult life: The Helsinki birth cohort study. Stroke 2007;38(2):264–70.Google Scholar

Hales, CN, Barker, DJ, Clark, PM, Cox, LJ, Fall, C, Osmond, C, Winter, PD. Fetal and infant growth and impaired glucose tolerance at age 64. BMJ 1991;303(6809):1019–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gardosi, J, Francis, A. Adverse pregnancy outcome and association with small for gestational age birthweight by customized and population-based percentiles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201(1):28.e1,28.e8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boers, KE, Vijgen, SM, Bijlenga, D, et al. Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: Randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT). BMJ 2010;341:c7087. doi:10.1136/bmj.c7087.Google Scholar

Froen, JF, Gardosi, JO, Thurmann, A, Francis, A, Stray-Pedersen, B. Restricted fetal growth in sudden intrauterine unexplained death. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004;83(9):801–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Singh, T, Leslie, K, Bhide, A, D’Antonio, F, Thilaganathan, B. Role of second-trimester uterine artery Doppler in assessing stillbirth risk. Obstet Gynecol 2012;119(2 Pt 1):256–61.Google Scholar

Alfirevic, Z, Stampalija, T, Gyte, GM. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 11:CD007529.Google Scholar

Cruz-Martinez, R, Figueras, F, Hernandez-Andrade, E, Oros, D, Gratacos, E. Fetal brain Doppler to predict cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status in term small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117(3):618–26.Google Scholar

Morales-Rosello, J, Khalil, A, Morlando, M, Bhide, A, Papageorghiou, A, Thilaganathan, B. Poor neonatal acid-base status in term fetuses with low cerebroplacental ratio. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;45(2):156–61.Google Scholar

Prior, T, Mullins, E, Bennett, P, Kumar, S. Prediction of intrapartum fetal compromise using the cerebroumbilical ratio: A prospective observational study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208(2):124.e1,124.e6.Google Scholar

Bricker, L, Medley, N, Pratt, JJ. Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks’ gestation). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;6:CD001451.Google Scholar

Warrander, LK, Batra, G, Bernatavicius, G, et al. Maternal perception of reduced fetal movements is associated with altered placental structure and function. PLoS One 2012;7(4):e34851.Google Scholar

Saastad, E, Tveit, JV, Flenady, V, Stray-Pedersen, B, Fretts, RC, Bordahl, PE, Froen, JF. Implementation of uniform information on fetal movement in a Norwegian population reduced delayed reporting of decreased fetal movement and stillbirths in primiparous women – a clinical quality improvement. BMC Res Notes 2010;3(1):2, doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-3-2.Google Scholar

Redman, CW, Sargent, IL, Staff, AC. IFPA Senior Award Lecture: Making sense of preeclampsia – two placental causes of preeclampsia? Placenta 2014;35 Suppl:S20–5.Google Scholar

Poon, LC, Syngelaki, A, Akolekar, R, Lai, J, Nicolaides, KH. Combined screening for preeclampsia and small for gestational age at 11–13 weeks. Fetal Diagn Ther 2013;33(1):16–27.Google Scholar

Akolekar, R, Syngelaki, A, Poon, L, Wright, D, Nicolaides, KH. Competing risks model in early screening for preeclampsia by biophysical and biochemical markers. Fetal Diagn Ther 2013;33(1):8–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ganzevoort, W, Rep, A, Bonsel, GJ, De Vries, JI, Wolf, H, for the Pi. Dynamics and incidence patterns of maternal complications in early onset hypertension of pregnancy. BJOG 2007;114(6):741–50.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, S, Irgens, LM. Fetal growth and body proportion in preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101(3):575–83.Google Scholar

Melchiorre, K, Sharma, R, Thilaganathan, B. Cardiovascular implications in preeclampsia: An overview. Circulation 2014;130(8):703–14.Google Scholar

Roberts, JM, Cooper, DW. Pathogenesis and genetics of pre-eclampsia. Lancet 2001;357(9249):53–6.Google Scholar

Redman, CW, Sacks, GP, Sargent, IL. Preeclampsia: An excessive maternal inflammatory response to pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180(2 Pt 1):499–506.Google Scholar

Pathak, S, Lees, CC, Hackett, G, Jessop, F, Sebire, NJ. Frequency and clinical significance of placental histological lesions in an unselected population at or near term. Virchows Arch 2011;459(6):565–72.Google Scholar

Kloosterman, GJ. On intrauterine growth – the significance of prenatal care. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1970;8(6 part 2):895–912.Google Scholar

Unterscheider, J, Daly, S, Geary, MP, Kennelly, MM, McAuliffe, FM, O’Donoghue, K, et al. Optimizing the definition of intrauterine growth restriction: The multicenter prospective PORTO Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208(4):290 e1–6.Google Scholar

Hecher, K, Bilardo, CM, Stigter, RH, Ville, Y, Hackeloer, BJ, Kok, HJ, et al. Monitoring of fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction: A longitudinal study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18(6):564–70.Google Scholar

Oros, D, Figueras, F, Cruz-Martinez, R, Meler, E, Munmany, M, Gratacos, E. Longitudinal changes in uterine, umbilical and fetal cerebral Doppler indices in late-onset small-for-gestational age fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;37(2):191–5.Google Scholar

Ferrazzi, E, Bozzo, M, Rigano, S, Bellotti, M, Morabito, A, Pardi, G, et al. Temporal sequence of abnormal Doppler changes in the peripheral and central circulatory systems of the severely growth-restricted fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;19(2):140–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baschat, AA, Cosmi, E, Bilardo, CM, Wolf, H, Berg, C, Rigano, S, et al. Predictors of neonatal outcome in early-onset placental dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109(2 Pt 1):253–61.Google Scholar

Baschat, AA, Gembruch, U, Harman, CR. The sequence of changes in Doppler and biophysical parameters as severe fetal growth restriction worsens. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18(6):571–7.Google Scholar

Del Rio, M, Martinez, JM, Figueras, F, Bennasar, M, Olivella, A, Palacio, M, et al. Doppler assessment of the aortic isthmus and perinatal outcome in preterm fetuses with severe intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;31(1):41–7.Google Scholar

Cruz-Martinez, R, Figueras, F, Hernandez-Andrade, E, Oros, D, Gratacos, E. Fetal brain Doppler to predict cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status in term small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117(3):618–26.Google Scholar

Flood, K, Unterscheider, J, Daly, S, Geary, MP, Kennelly, MM, McAuliffe, FM, et al. The role of brain sparing in the prediction of adverse outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction: Results of the multicenter PORTO Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;211(3):288 e1–5.Google Scholar

Morales-Rosello, J, Khalil, A, Morlando, M, Papageorghiou, A, Bhide, A, Thilaganathan, B. Changes in fetal Doppler indices as a marker of failure to reach growth potential at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;43(3):303–10.Google Scholar

Bilardo, CM, Wolf, H, Stigter, RH, Ville, Y, Baez, E, Visser, GH, et al. Relationship between monitoring parameters and perinatal outcome in severe, early intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;23(2):119–25.Google Scholar

Chappell, LC, Duckworth, S, Seed, PT, Griffin, M, Myers, J, Mackillop, L, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of placental growth factor in women with suspected preeclampsia: A prospective multicenter study. Circulation 2013;128(19):2121–31.Google Scholar

Benton, SJ, Hu, Y, Xie, F, Kupfer, K, Lee, SW, Magee, LA, et al. Can placental growth factor in maternal circulation identify fetuses with placental intrauterine growth restriction? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206(2):163 e1–7.Google Scholar

Calabrese, S, Cardellicchio, M, Mazzocco, M, Taricco, E, Martinelli, A, Cetin, I. Placental growth factor (PLGF) maternal circulating levels in normal pregnancies and in pregnancies at risk of developing placental insufficiency complications. Reprod Sci 2012;19(3):211A–2A.Google Scholar

Chaiworapongsa, T, Romero, R, Korzeniewski, SJ, Kusanovic, JP, Soto, E, Hernandez-Andrade, E, et al. Prediction of stillbirth and late-onset preeclampsia. Reprod Sci 2012;19(3):90A–1A.Google Scholar

Griffin, M, Seed, P, Webster, L, Tarft, H, Chappell, L, Shennan, A. Placental growth factor (PLGF) and ultrasound parameters for predicting the small for gestational age infant (SGA) in suspected small for gestational age: Pelican FGR study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014;27:121–2.Google Scholar

Arduini, D, Rizzo, G, Caforio, L, Boccolini, MR, Romanini, C, Mancuso, S. Behavioural state transitions in healthy and growth retarded fetuses. Early Hum Dev 1989;19(3):155–65.Google Scholar

Groom, KM, North, RA, Poppe, KK, Sadler, L, McCowan, LM. The association between customised small for gestational age infants and pre-eclampsia or gestational hypertension varies with gestation at delivery. BJOG 2007;114(4):478–84.Google Scholar

Ganzevoort, W, Rep, A, Bonsel, GJ, Fetter, WP, Van Sonderen, L, De Vries, JI, et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing two temporising management strategies, one with and one without plasma volume expansion, for severe and early onset pre-eclampsia. BJOG 2005;112(10):1358–68.Google Scholar

Dektas, B, Sibai, B, Habli, M. Pregnancies complicated with fetal growth restriction (FGR) are associated with a high rate of subsequent development of preeclampsia? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208(1):S179–S80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gordijn, SJ, Beune, IM, Thilaganathan, B, Papageorghiou, A, Baschat, AA, Baker, PN, et al. Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;48(3):333–9.Google Scholar

Vasak, B, Koenen, SV, Koster, MP, Hukkelhoven, CW, Franx, A, Hanson, MA, et al. Human fetal growth is constrained below optimal for perinatal survival. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014.Google Scholar

Villar, J, Papageorghiou, AT, Pang, R, Ohuma, EO, Ismail, LC, Barros, FC, et al. The likeness of fetal growth and newborn size across non-isolated populations in the INTERGROWTH-21 Project: The Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study and Newborn Cross-Sectional Study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2014.Google Scholar

Papageorghiou, AT, Ohuma, EO, Altman, DG, Todros, T, Cheikh, Ismail, L, Lambert, A, et al. International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Lancet 2014;384(9946):869–79.Google Scholar

Lees, C, Marlow, N, Arabin, B, Bilardo, CM, Brezinka, C, Derks, JB, Duvekot, J, Frusca, T, Diemert, A, Ferrazzi, E, Ganzevoort, W, Hecher, K, Martinelli, P, Ostermayer, E, Papageorghiou, AT, Schlembach, D, Schneider, KTM, Thilaganathan, B, Todros, T, Van Wassenaer Leemhuis, A, Valcamonico, A, Visser, GHA, Wolf, H. Perinatal morbidity and mortality in early‐onset fetal growth restriction: Cohort outcomes of the trial of randomized umbilical and fetal flow in Europe (TRUFFLE). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;42(4):400–8. doi:10.1002/uog.13190.Google Scholar

Mongelli, M, Gardosi, J. Fetal growth velocity. Lancet 1999;353(9170):2156. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)75590–2.Google Scholar

Lin, CC, Santolaya-Forgas, J. Current concepts of fetal growth restriction: Part I. Causes, classification, and pathophysiology.Obstet Gynecol 1998;92(6):1044–55.Google Scholar

Papageorghiou, AT, Ohuma, EO, Altman, DG, Todros, T. International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century (INTERGROWTH-21st). International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Lancet 2014 Sep 6;384(9946):869–79. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61490–2.Google Scholar

Gardosi, J, Figueras, F, Clausson, B, Francis, A. The customised growth potential: An international research tool to study the epidemiology of fetal growth. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2011;25(1):2–10. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3016.2010.01166.x.Google Scholar

Unterscheider, J, Daly, S, Geary, MP, Kennelly, MM, McAuliffe, FM, O’Donoghue, K, Hunter, A, Morrison, JJ, Burke, G, Dicker, P, Tully, EC, Malone, FD. Optimizing the definition of intrauterine growth restriction: The multicenter prospective PORTO study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208(4):290.e1-.e6. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.007.Google Scholar

Yaron, Y, Heifetz, S, Ochshorn, Y, Lehavi, O, Orr-Urtreger, A. Decreased first trimester PAPP-A is a predictor of adverse pregnancy outcome. Prenat Diagn 2002;22(9):778–82. doi:10.1002/pd.407.Google Scholar

Goetzl, L, Krantz, D, Group, NBS. Low first-trimester PAPP-a identifies pregnancies requiring IUGR screening. Am J Obstet Gynecol December 2003;189(6): Supplement, Page S215Google Scholar

Krantz, D, Goetz, L, Simpson, JL. Association of extreme first-trimester free human chorionic gonadotropin-beta, pregnancy-associated plasma protein A, and nuchal translucency with intrauterine growth restriction and other adverse pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004 Oct;191(4):1452–8.Google Scholar

Albaiges, G. One-stage screening for pregnancy complications by color Doppler assessment of the uterine arteries at 23 weeks’ gestation. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96(4):559–64.Google Scholar

Campbell, S, Black, RS, Lees, CC, Armstrong, V, Peacock, JL. Doppler ultrasound of the maternal uterine arteries: Disappearance of abnormal waveforms and relation to birthweight and pregnancy outcome. http://dxdoiorg/101080/j1600-04122000079008631x. 2009;79(8):631–4. doi:10.1080/j.1600-0412.2000.079008631.xGoogle Scholar

Kingdom, JCP, Burrell, SJ, Kaufmann, P. Pathology and clinical implications of abnormal umbilical artery Doppler waveforms. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;9(4):271–86. doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.09040271.x.Google Scholar

Ott, WJ. Diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction: Comparison of ultrasound parameters. Am J Perinatol 2002;19(3):133–7. doi:10.1055/s-2002–25313.Google Scholar

Rowlands, DJ, Vyas, SK. Longitudinal study of fetal middle cerebral artery flow velocity waveforms preceding fetal death. BJOG 1995;102(11):888–90. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb10876.x.Google Scholar

Baschat, AA, Hecher, K. Fetal growth restriction due to placental disease. Semin Perinatol 2004;28(1):67–80.Google Scholar

Lees, CC, Marlow, N, Van Wassenaer-Leemhuis, A, Arabin, B, Bilardo, CM, Brezinka, C, Calvert, S, Derks, JB, Diemert, A, Duvekot, JJ, Ferrazzi, E, Frusca, T, Ganzevoort, W, Hecher, K, Martinelli, P, Ostermayer, E, Papageorghiou, AT, Schlembach, D, Schneider, KTM, Thilaganathan, B, Todros, T, Valcamonico, A, Visser, GHA, Wolf, H. 2 year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction (TRUFFLE): A randomised trial. Lancet March 2015. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62049-3.Google Scholar

Ferrazzi, E, Bozzo, M, Rigano, S, Bellotti, M, Morabito, A, Pardi, G, Battaglia, FC, Galan, HL. Temporal sequence of abnormal Doppler changes in the peripheral and central circulatory systems of the severely growth‐restricted fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;19(2):140–6. doi:10.1046/j.0960-7692.2002.00627.x.Google Scholar

Hecher, K, Campbell, S, Doyle, P, Harrington, K, Nicolaides, K. Assessment of fetal compromise by Doppler ultrasound investigation of the fetal circulation. Arterial, intracardiac, and venous blood flow velocity studies. Circulation 1995;91(1):129–38. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.91.1.129.Google Scholar

Vergani, P, Roncaglia, N, Locatelli, A, Andreotti, C, Crippa, I, Pezzullo, JC, Ghidini, A. Antenatal predictors of neonatal outcome in fetal growth restriction with absent end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193(3 Pt 2):1213–18. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.07.032.Google Scholar

Khoury, MJ, Erickson, JD, Cordero, JF, McCarthy, BJ. Congenital malformations and intrauterine growth retardation: A population study. Pediatrics 1988;82(1):83–90.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, GL, Wilson, PD, Permutt, T, Boughman, JA, Ferencz, C. Birth weight and cardiovascular malformations: A population-based study. The Baltimore-Washington Infant Study. Am J Epidemiol 1991;133(12):1273–81.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, GL. Patterns of prenatal growth among infants with cardiovascular malformations: possible fetal hemodynamic effects. Am J Epidemiol 1996;143(5):505–13.Google Scholar

Spiers, PS. Does growth retardation predispose the fetus to congenital malformation? Lancet 1982;1(8267):312–14.Google Scholar

Capper, A. The fate and development of the immature and of the premature child: A clinical study. Review of the Literature and Study of Cerebral Hemorrhage in the New-Born Infant. Am J Dis Child 1928;35(2):262–88. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1928.01920200094012.Google Scholar

Kumar, S. Handbook of Fetal Medicine. Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Hussain, U, Daemen, A, Missfelder-Lobos, H, De, Moor, B, Timmerman, D, Bourne, T, Lees, C. Umbilical artery pulsatility index and fetal abdominal circumference in isolated gastroschisis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;38(5):538–42. doi:10.1002/uog.8947.Google Scholar

Carroll, SG, Kuo, PY, Kyle, PM, Soothill, PW. Fetal protein loss in gastroschisis as an explanation of associated morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184(6):1297–301. doi:10.1067/mob.2001.114031.Google Scholar

Norman, SM, Odibo, AO, Longman, RE, Roehl, KA, Macones, GA, Cahill, AG. Neural tube defects and associated low birth weight. Am J Perinatol 2012;29(6):473–6. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1304830.Google Scholar

Scott, KE, Usher, R. Fetal malnutrition: Its incidence, causes, and effects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1966;94(7):951–63.Google Scholar

Snijders, RJ, Sherrod, C, Gosden, CM, Nicolaides, KH. Fetal growth retardation: Associated malformations and chromosomal abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168(2):547–55.Google Scholar

Wilkins-Haug, L, Roberts, DJ, Morton, CC. Confined placental mosaicism and intrauterine growth retardation: A case-control analysis of placentas at delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172(1):44–50. doi:10.1016/0002-9378(95)90082–9.Google Scholar

Boghassian, NS et al. Anthropometric charts for infants with trisomies 21, 18, or 13 born between 22 weeks gestation and term: The VON charts. Am J Med Genet A 2012 Feb;158A(2):322–32. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34423. Epub 2012 Jan 13.Google Scholar

Morris, JK, Cole, TJ, Springett, AL, Dennis, J. Down syndrome birth weight in England and Wales: Implications for clinical practice. Am J Med Genet A 2015;167A(12):3070–5. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.37366.Google Scholar

Yeo, L, Guzman, ER, Day-Salvatore, D, Walters, C, Chavez, D, Vintzileos, AM. Prenatal detection of fetal trisomy 18 through abnormal sonographic features. J Ultrasound Med 2003;22(6):581–90–quiz591–2.Google Scholar

Snijders, RJ, Sebire, NJ, Nayar, R, Souka, A, Nicolaides, KH. Increased nuchal translucency in trisomy 13 fetuses at 10–14 weeks of gestation. Am J Med Genet 1999;86(3):205–7.Google Scholar

Kroes, I, Janssens, S, Defoort, P. Ultrasound features in trisomy 13 (Patau syndrome) and trisomy 18 (Edwards syndrome) in a consecutive series of 47 cases. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2014;6(4):245–9.Google Scholar

Abu-Amero, S, Wakeling, EL, Preece, M, Whittaker, J, Stanier, P, Moore, GE. Epigenetic signatures of Silver-Russell syndrome. J Med Genet 2010;47(3):150–4. doi:10.1136/jmg.2009.071316.Google Scholar

Prickett, AR, Ishida, M, Böhm, S, Frost, JM, Puszyk, W, Abu-Amero, S, Stanier, P, Schulz, R, Moore, GE, Oakey, RJ. Genome-wide methylation analysis in Silver-Russell syndrome patients. Hum Genet 2015;134(3):317–32. doi:10.1007/s00439-014-1526-1.Google Scholar

Price, SM, Stanhope, R, Garrett, C, Preece, MA, Trembath, RC. The spectrum of Silver-Russell syndrome: A clinical and molecular genetic study and new diagnostic criteria. J Med Genet 1999;36(11):837–42.Google Scholar

Wakeling, EL, Amero, SA, Alders, M, Bliek, J, Forsythe, E, Kumar, S, Lim, DH, MacDonald, F, Mackay, DJ, Maher, ER, Moore, GE, Poole, RL, Price, SM, Tangeraas, T, Turner, CLS, Van, Haelst, MM, Willoughby, C, Temple, IK, Cobben, JM. Epigenotype–phenotype correlations in Silver-Russell syndrome. J Med Genet 2010;47(11):jmg.2010.079111-jmg.2010.079768. doi:10.1136/jmg.2010.079111.Google Scholar

Paladini, D, Volpe, P. Ultrasound of Congenital Fetal Anomalies: Differential Diagnosis and Prognostic Indicators. 2014.Google Scholar

Chen, M, Hwu, W-L, Kuo, S-J, Chen, C-P, Yin, P-L, Chang, S-P, Lee, D-J, Chen, T-H, Wang, B-T, Lin, CC. Subtelomeric rearrangements and 22q11.2 deletion syndrome in anomalous growth-restricted fetuses with normal or balanced G-banded karyotype. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;28(7):939–43. doi:10.1002/uog.3884.Google Scholar

Volpe, P, Marasini, M, Caruso, G, Marzullo, A, Buonadonna, AL, Arciprete, P, Di Paolo, S, Volpe, G, Gentile, M. 22q11 deletions in fetuses with malformations of the outflow tracts or interruption of the aortic arch: Impact of additional ultrasound signs. Prenat Diagn 2003;23(9):752–7. doi:10.1002/pd.682.Google Scholar

Tavormina, PL, Shiang, R, Thompson, LM, Zhu, YZ, Wilkin, DJ, Lachman, RS, Wilcox, WR, Rimoin, DL, Cohn, DH, Wasmuth, JJ. Thanatophoric dysplasia (types I and II) caused by distinct mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptor 3. Nat Genet 1995;9(3):321–8. doi:10.1038/ng0395-321.Google Scholar

Vanhoenacker, FM, Van der Aa, N, Blaumeiser, B. The French telephone receiver sign in thanatophoric dysplasia. JBR-BTR 2009;92(1):63.Google Scholar

Langer, LO, Yang, SS, Hall, JG, Sommer, A, Kottamasu, SR, Golabi, M, Krassikoff, N. Thanatophoric dysplasia and cloverleaf skull. Am J Med Genet Suppl 1987;3:167–79.Google Scholar

Picone, O, Simon, I, Benachi, A, Brunelle, F, Sonigo, P. Comparison between ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of fetal cytomegalovirus infection. Prenat Diagn 2008;28(8):753–8. doi:10.1002/pd.2037.Google Scholar

Lazzarotto, T, Guerra, B, Lanari, M, Gabrielli, L, Landini, MP. New advances in the diagnosis of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Clin Virol 2008;41(3):192–7. doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2007.10.015.Google Scholar

Feldman, B, Yinon, Y, Tepperberg, Oikawa, M, Yoeli, R, Schiff, E, Lipitz, S. Pregestational, periconceptional, and gestational primary maternal cytomegalovirus infection: Prenatal diagnosis in 508 pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205(4):342.e1–342.e6. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2011.05.030.Google Scholar

Ruellan Eugene, G, Barjot, P, Campet, M, Vabret, A, Herlicoviez, M, Muller, G, Levy, G, Guillois, B, Freymuth, F, Freymuth, F. Evaluation of virological procedures to detect fetal human cytomegalovirus infection: Avidity of IgG antibodies, virus detection in amniotic fluid and maternal serum. J Med Virol 1996;50(1):9–15. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096–9071(199609)50:1<9::AID-JMV3>3.0.CO;2–5.Google Scholar

Guerra, B, Lazzarotto, T, Quarta, S, Lanari, M, Bovicelli, L, Nicolosi, A, Landini, MP. Prenatal diagnosis of symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183(2):476–82. doi:10.1067/mob.2000.106347.Google Scholar

Gouarin, S, Gault, E, Vabret, A, Cointe, D, Rozenberg, F, Grangeot-Keros, L, Barjot, P, Garbarg-Chenon, A, Lebon, P, Freymuth, F. Real-time PCR quantification of human cytomegalovirus DNA in amniotic fluid samples from mothers with primary infection. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40(5):1767–72. doi:10.1128/JCM.40.5.1767-1772.2002.Google Scholar

Picone, O, Costa, J-M, Leruez-Ville, M, Ernault, P. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) glycoprotein B genotype and CMV DNA load in the amniotic fluid of infected fetuses. Prenat Diagn 2004.Google Scholar

Nedelec, O, Bellagra, N, Devisme, L, Hober, D, Wattré, P, Dewilde, A. [Congenital human cytomegalovirus infection: Value of human cytomegalovirus DNA quantification in amniotic fluid]. Ann Biol Clin (Paris) 2002;60(2):201–7.Google Scholar

Revello, MG, Lazzarotto, T, Guerra, B, Spinillo, A, Ferrazzi, E, Kustermann, A, Guaschino, S, Vergani, P, Todros, T, Frusca, T, Arossa, A, Furione, M, Rognoni, V, Rizzo, N, Gabrielli, L, Klersy, C, Gerna, G, CHIP Study Group. A randomized trial of hyperimmune globulin to prevent congenital cytomegalovirus. N Engl J Med 2014;370(14):1316–26. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1310214.Google Scholar

Jacquemard, F, Yamamoto, M, Costa, J-M, Romand, S, Jaqz-Aigrain, E, Dejean, A, Daffos, F, Ville, Y. Maternal administration of valaciclovir in symptomatic intrauterine cytomegalovirus infection. BJOG 2007;114(9):1113–21. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01308.x.Google Scholar

Kimberlin, DW, Jester, PM, Sánchez, PJ. Valganciclovir for symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus disease. N Engl J Med 2015;372(10):933–43. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1404599.Google Scholar

Lipitz, S, Yinon, Y, Malinger, G, Yagel, S, Levit, L, Hoffman, C, Rantzer, R, Weisz, B. Risk of cytomegalovirus-associated sequelae in relation to time of infection and findings on prenatal imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;41(5):508–14. doi:10.1002/uog.12377.Google Scholar

Farkas, N, Hoffmann, C, Ben-Sira, L, Lev, D, Schweiger, A, Kidron, D, Lerman-Sagie, T, Malinger, G. Does normal fetal brain ultrasound predict normal neurodevelopmental outcome in congenital cytomegalovirus infection? Prenat Diagn 2011;31(4):360–6. doi:10.1002/pd.2694.Google Scholar

Malinger, G, Lev, D, Lerman-Sagie, T. Imaging of fetal cytomegalovirus infection. Fetal Diagn Ther 2011;29(2):117–26. doi:10.1159/000321346.Google Scholar

Yinon, Y, Farine, D, Yudin, MH. Screening, diagnosis, and management of cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2010;65(11):736–43. doi:10.1097/OGX.0b013e31821102b4.Google Scholar

Dunn, D, Wallon, M, Peyron, F, Petersen, E, Peckham, C, Gilbert, R. Mother-to-child transmission of toxoplasmosis: risk estimates for clinical counselling. Lancet 1999;353(9167):1829–33. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(98)08220-8.Google Scholar

Romand, et al. Usefulness of quantitative polymerase chain reaction in amniotic fluid as early prognostic marker of fetal infection with Toxoplasma gondii. Am J Obstet Gynecol March 2004;190(3):797–802.Google Scholar

Malinger, G, Werner, H, Rodriguez, Leonel, JC, Rebolledo, M, Duque, M, Mizyrycki, S, Lerman, Sagie, T, Herrera, M. Prenatal brain imaging in congenital toxoplasmosis. Prenat Diagn 2011;31(9):881–6. doi:10.1002/pd.2795.Google Scholar

Berrébi, A, Assouline, C, Bessières, M-H, Lathière, M, Cassaing, S, Minville, V, Ayoubi, J-M. Long-term outcome of children with congenital toxoplasmosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203(6):552.e1-e6. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.002.Google Scholar

Tookey, PA. Review of antenatal rubella susceptibility screening and the standard criteria for screening. Institute of Child Health May 2012:1–11.Google Scholar

Hardelid, P, Cortina-Borja, M, Williams, D, Tookey, PA, Peckham, CS, Cubitt, WD, Dezateux, C. Rubella seroprevalence in pregnant women in North Thames: Estimates based on newborn screening samples. J Med Screen 2009;16(1):1–6. doi:10.1258/jms.2009.008080.Google Scholar

Robertson, SE, Featherstone, DA, Gacic-Dobo, M, Hersh, BS. Rubella and congenital rubella syndrome: Global update. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2003;14(5):306–15.Google Scholar

Bramham, K, Parnell, B, Nelson-Piercy, C, et al. Chronic hypertension and pregnancy outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2014;348:g2301.Google Scholar

Dahlstrom, BL, Engh, ME, Bukholm, G, et al. Changes in the prevalence of pre-eclampsia in Akershus County and the rest of Norway during the past 35 years. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006;85:916–21.Google Scholar

Klungsøyr, K, Morken, NH, Irgens, L, Vollset, SE, Skjaerven, R. Secular trends in the epidemiology of pre-eclampsia throughout 40 years in Norway: Prevalence, risk factors and perinatal survival. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2012;26:190–8.Google Scholar

Sibai, BM. Diagnosis and management of gestational hypertension and reeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:181–92.Google Scholar

Saftlas, AF, Olson, DR, Franks, AL, et al. Epidemiology of preeclampsia and eclampsia in the United States, 1979–1986. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;163:460–5.Google Scholar

Ananth, CV, Vintzileos, AM. Maternal-fetal conditions necessitating a medical intervention resulting in preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:1557–63.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:1122–31.Google Scholar

Lowe, SA, Brown, MA, Dekker, GA, et al. Guidelines for the management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy 2008. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2009;49:242–6.Google Scholar

Saudan, P, Brown, MA, Buddle, ML et al. Does gestational hypertension become pre-eclampsia? BJOG 1998;105:1177–84.Google Scholar

Roberts, CL, Algert, CS, Morris, JM, et al. Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: A population-based study. Med J Australia 2005;182:332–5.Google Scholar

Macdonald-Wallis, C, Tilling, K, Fraser, A, et al. Associations of blood pressure change in pregnancy with fetal growth and gestational age at delivery: Findings from a prospective cohort. Hypertension 2014;64:36–44.Google Scholar

Marin, R, Gorostidi, M, Portal, CG, et al. Long-term prognosis of hypertension in pregnancy. Hypertens Pregnancy 2000;19:199–209.Google Scholar

Magnussen, EB, Vatten, LJ, Smith, GD, Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and subsequently measured cardiovascular risk factors. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114:961–70.Google Scholar

Melamed, N, Ray, JG, Hladunewich, M, et al. Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia: Are they the same disease? J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2014 Jul; 36(7):642–7.Google Scholar

Zetterström, K, Lindeberg, SN, Haglund, B, et al. Chronic hypertension as a risk factor for offspring to be born small for gestational age. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006;85(9):1046–50.Google Scholar

Osol, G, Moore, LG. Maternal uterine vascular remodeling during pregnancy. Microcirculation 2014;21:38–47.Google Scholar

Burton, GJ, Fowden, A. The placenta: A multifaceted, transient organ. Phil Trans R Soc 2015;370(1663):20140066.Google Scholar

Nelson, SH, Steinsland, OS, Wang, Y, et al. Increased nitric oxide synthase activity and expression in the human uterine artery during pregnancy. Circ Res 2000;87:406–11.Google Scholar

Burton, GJ, Woods, AW, Jauniaux, E, et al. Rheological and physiological consequences of conversion of the maternal spiral arteries for uteroplacental blood flow during human pregnancy. Placenta 2009;30:473–82.Google Scholar

Gyselaers, W, Mullens, W, Tomsin, K, et al. Role of dysfunctional maternal venous hemodynamics in the pathophysiology of pre-eclampsia: A review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;38:123–9.Google Scholar

Huppertz, B. Placental origins of preeclampsia: Challenging the current hypothesis. Hypertension 2008;5:970–5.Google Scholar

Jauniaux, E, Watson, AL, Hempstock, J, et al. Onset of maternal arterial blood flow and placental oxidative stress. A possible factor in human early pregnancy failure. Am J Pathol 2000;157:2111–22.Google Scholar

Burton, GJ, Watson, AL, Hempstock, J, et al. Uterine glands provide histiotrophic nutrition for the human fetus during the first trimester of pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002;87:2954–9.Google Scholar

Burton, GJ, Jauniaux, E, Charnock-Jones, DS. The influence of the intrauterine environment on human placental development. Int J Dev Biol 2010;54:303–12.Google Scholar

Redman, CW, Sargent, IL. Latest advances in understanding preeclampsia. Science 2005;308:1592–4.Google Scholar

Moll, W. Structure adaptation and blood flow control in the uterine arterial system after hemochorial placentation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003;110 Suppl 1:S19–27.Google Scholar

Redman, CW. Current topic: Pre-eclampsia and the placenta. Placenta 1991;12:301–8.Google Scholar

Redman, CW, Sargent, IL, Staff, AC. IFPA Senior Award Lecture: Making sense of pre-eclampsia – Two placental causes of preeclampsia? Placenta 2014;35 Suppl:S20–5.Google Scholar

Senft, D, Ronai, ZA. UPR, autophagy, and mitochondria crosstalk underlies the ER stress response. Trends Biochem Sci 2015 Feb 2. pii:S0968-0004(15)00003-1.Google Scholar

Burton, GJ, Jauniaux, E. Placental oxidative stress: From miscarriage to preeclampsia. J Soc Gynecol Investig 2004;11:342e52.Google Scholar

Roberts, JM, Taylor, RN, Musci, TJ et al. Preeclampsia: An endothelial cell disorder. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161:1200–4.Google Scholar

Redman, CW, Sargent, IL. Placental stress and pre-eclampsia: A revised view. Placenta 2009;30 Suppl A:S38–42.Google Scholar

Redman, CW, Sargent, IL. Pre-eclampsia, the placenta and the maternal systemic inflammatory response – a review. Placenta 2003;Suppl A:S21–7.Google Scholar

Sitia, S, Tomasoni, L, Atzeni, F, et al. From endothelial dysfunction to atherosclerosis. Autoimmun Rev 2010;9:830–4.Google Scholar

Prieto, D, Contreras, C, Sánchez, A. Endothelial dysfunction, obesity and insulin resistance. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 2014;12:412–26.Google Scholar

Maynard, SE, Min, JY, Merchan, J, et al. Excess placental soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt1) may contribute to endothelial dysfunction, hypertension, and proteinuria in preeclampsia. J Clin Invest 2003;111:649e58.Google Scholar

De Falco, S. The discovery of placenta growth factor and its biological activity. Exp Mol Med 2012;44:1–9.Google Scholar

Lankhorst, S, Saleh, L, Danser, AJ, et al. Etiology of angiogenesis inhibition-related hypertension. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2014;21C:7–13.Google Scholar

LaMarca, BD, Alexander, BT, Gilbert, JS, et al. Pathophysiology of hypertension in response to placental ischemia during pregnancy: A central role for endothelin? Gend Med 2008;5 Suppl A:S133–8.Google Scholar

Yung, HW, Hemberger, M, Watson, ED, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress disrupts placental morphogenesis: Implications for human intrauterine growth restriction. J Pathol 2012;228:554–64.Google Scholar

Xiong, X, Demianczuk, NN, Saunders, LD, et al. Impact of preeclampsia and gestational hypertension on birth weight by gestational age. Am J Epidemiol 2002;155:203–9.Google Scholar

Moore, MP, Redman, CW. Case-control study of severe pre-eclampsia of early onset. Br Med J Clin Res Ed 1983;287:580–3.Google Scholar

Lees, C, Marlow, N, Arabin, B, et al. Perinatal morbidity and mortality in early-onset fetal growth restriction: Cohort outcomes of the trial of randomized umbilical and fetal flow in Europe (TRUFFLE). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;42:400–8.Google Scholar

Verlohren, S1, Melchiorre, K, Khalil, A, et al. Uterine artery Doppler, birth weight and timing of onset of pre-eclampsia: Providing insights into the dual etiology of late-onset pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;44:293–8.Google Scholar

Almog, B, Shehata, F, Aljabri, S, et al. Placenta weight percentile curves for singleton and twins deliveries. Placenta 2011;32:58e62.Google Scholar

Norwitz, ER, Snegovskikh, VV, Caughey, AB. Prolonged pregnancy: When should we intervene? Clin Obstet Gynecol 2007;50:547e57.Google Scholar

Caughey, AB, Stotland, NE, Escobar, GJ. What is the best measure of maternal complications of term pregnancy: Ongoing pregnancies or pregnancies delivered? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:1047e52.Google Scholar

Jones, CJ, Fox, H. Ultrastructure of the placenta in prolonged pregnancy. J Pathol 1978;126:173e9.Google Scholar

Dahlstrøm, B, Romundstad, P, Øian, P et al. Placenta weight in pre-eclampsia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008;87:608e11.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, S, Irgens, LM, Espinoza, J. Maternal obesity and excess of fetal growth in pre-eclampsia. BJOG 2014;121:1351–7.Google Scholar

Morales-Roselló, J, Khalil, A, Morlando, M, et al. Changes in fetal Doppler indices as a marker of failure to reach growth potential at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;43:303–10.Google Scholar

Redman, CW, Jacobson, S-L, Russell, R. Hypertension in pregnancy. In Powrie, RO, Greene, ME, Camann, W, eds. Medical Disorders in Obstetric Practice. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester. 2010:153–81.Google Scholar

Lisonkova, S, Joseph, KS. Incidence of preeclampsia: Risk factors and outcomes associated with early- versus late-onset disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;209:544.e1–544.e12.Google Scholar

Redman, CW, Sargent, IL. Immunology of pre-eclampsia. Am J Reprod Immunol 2010;63:534–43.Google Scholar

Cotechini, T, Komisarenko, M, Sperou, A, et al. Inflammation in rat pregnancy inhibits spiral artery remodeling leading to fetal growth restriction and features of preeclampsia. J Exp Med 2014;211:165–79.Google Scholar

Whitley, GS, Dash, PR, Ayling, LJ, Prefumo, F, Thilaganathan, B, Cartwright, JE. Increased apoptosis in first trimester extravillous trophoblasts from pregnancies at higher risk of developing preeclampsia. Am J Pathol 2007;170:1903–9.Google Scholar

Melchiorre, K, Sutherland, G, Sharma, R, Nanni, M, Thilaganathan, B. Mid-gestational maternal cardiovascular profile in preterm and term pre-eclampsia: A prospective study. BJOG 2013;120:496–504.Google Scholar

Parks, WT. Placental hypoxia: The lesions of maternal malperfusion. Semin Perinatol 2015;39:9–19.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, B, Levytska, K, Kingdom, J, et al. Villous trophoblast abnormalities in extremely preterm deliveries with elevated second trimester maternal serum hCG or inhibin-A. Placenta 2011;32:339–45.Google Scholar

Staff, AC, Dechend, R, Pijnenborg, R. Learning from the placenta: Acute atherosis and vascular remodeling in preeclampsia-novel aspects for atherosclerosis and future cardiovascular health. Hypertension 2010;56:1026–34.Google Scholar

(HFEA), H.F.a.E.A. Fertility Treatment in 2013: Facts and Figures.Google Scholar

O’Flynn, N. Assessment and treatment for people with fertility problems: NICE guideline. Br J Gen Pract 2014;64(618):50–1.Google Scholar

Stojnic, J, et al. Perinatal outcome of singleton pregnancies following in vitro fertilization. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2013;40(2):277–83.Google Scholar

Koudstaal, J, et al. Obstetric outcome of singleton pregnancies after IVF: a matched control study in four Dutch university hospitals. Hum Reprod 2000;15(8):1819–25.Google Scholar

Wang, JX et al. The obstetric outcome of singleton pregnancies following in-vitro fertilization/gamete intra-fallopian transfer. Hum Reprod 1994;9(1):141–6.Google Scholar

Doyle, P, Beral, V, Maconochie, N. Preterm delivery, low birthweight and small-for-gestational-age in liveborn singleton babies resulting from in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1992;7(3):425–8.Google Scholar

Valenzuela-Alcaraz, B, et al. Differential effect of mode of conception and infertility treatment on fetal growth and prematurity. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016:1–6.Google Scholar

Kondapalli, LA, Perales-Puchalt, A. Low birth weight: Is it related to assisted reproductive technology or underlying infertility? Fertil Steril 2013. 99(2):303–10.Google Scholar

Malchau, SS, et al. Perinatal outcomes in 6,338 singletons born after intrauterine insemination in Denmark, 2007 to 2012: The influence of ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril 2014;102(4):1110–16 e2.Google Scholar

Wisborg, K, Ingerslev, HJ, Henriksen, TB. IVF and stillbirth: A prospective follow-up study. Hum Reprod 2010;25(5):1312–16.Google Scholar

Bensdorp, AJ, et al. Dizygotic twin pregnancies after medically assisted reproduction and after natural conception: Maternal and perinatal outcomes. Fertil Steril 2016.Google Scholar

Takeshima, K, et al. Impact of single embryo transfer policy on perinatal outcomes in fresh and frozen cycles-analysis of the Japanese Assisted Reproduction Technology registry between 2007 and 2012. Fertil Steril 2016;105(2):337–46 e3.Google Scholar

Tomic, V, Tomic, J. Neonatal outcome of IVF singletons versus naturally conceived in women aged 35 years and over. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011;284(6)1411–16.Google Scholar

Wennberg, AL, et al. Effect of maternal age on maternal and neonatal outcomes after assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril 2016.Google Scholar

Luke, B, et al. Factors associated with ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and its effect on assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment and outcome. Fertil Steril 2010;94(4):1399–404.Google Scholar

Imudia, AN, et al. Peak serum estradiol level during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation is associated with increased risk of small for gestational age and preeclampsia in singleton pregnancies after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2012;97(6):1374–9.Google Scholar

Kalra, SK, et al. Ovarian stimulation and low birth weight in newborns conceived through in vitro fertilization. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118(4):863–71.Google Scholar

Zhu, J, et al. Does IVF cleavage stage embryo quality affect pregnancy complications and neonatal outcomes in singleton gestations after double embryo transfers? J Assist Reprod Genet 2014;31(12):1635–41.Google Scholar

Li, Z, et al. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: A population-based cohort study. Hum Reprod 2014;29(12):2794–801.Google Scholar

Kato, O, et al. Neonatal outcome and birth defects in 6623 singletons born following minimal ovarian stimulation and vitrified versus fresh single embryo transfer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012;161(1):46–50.Google Scholar

Haavaldsen, C, Tanbo, T, Eskild, A. Placental weight in singleton pregnancies with and without assisted reproductive technology: a population study of 536,567 pregnancies. Hum Reprod 2012;27(2):576–82.Google Scholar

Nelissen, EC, et al. Altered gene expression in human placentas after IVF/ICSI. Hum Reprod 2014;29(12):2821–31.Google Scholar

Bloise, E, Feuer, SK, Rinaudo, PF. Comparative intrauterine development and placental function of ART concepti: Implications for human reproductive medicine and animal breeding. Hum Reprod Update 2014;20(6):822–39.Google Scholar

Bertolini, M, et al. Morphology and morphometry of in vivo- and in vitro-produced bovine concepti from early pregnancy to term and association with high birth weights. Theriogenology 2002;58(5):973–94.Google Scholar

Zhang, Y, et al. Ultrastructural study on human placentae from women subjected to assisted reproductive technology treatments. Biol Reprod 2011;85(3):635–42.Google Scholar

Bonduelle, M, et al. Prenatal testing in ICSI pregnancies: Incidence of chromosomal anomalies in 1586 karyotypes and relation to sperm parameters. Hum Reprod 2002;17(10):2600–14.Google Scholar

Whitelaw, N, et al. Epigenetic status in the offspring of spontaneous and assisted conception. Hum Reprod 2014;29(7):1452–8.Google Scholar

Allen, C, Reardon, W. Assisted reproduction technology and defects of genomic imprinting. BJOG 2005;112(12):1589–94.Google Scholar

Dupont, C, Sifer, C. A review of outcome data concerning children born following assisted reproductive technologies. ISRN Obstet Gynecol 2012:405382.Google Scholar

Zhu, JL, et al. Infertility, infertility treatment, and congenital malformations: Danish national birth cohort. BMJ 2006;333(7570):679.Google Scholar

Sanchez-Calabuig, MJ, et al. Potential health risks associated to ICSI: Insights from animal models and strategies for a safe procedure. Front Public Health 2014;2:241.Google Scholar

Magee, BD, Hattis, D, Kivel, NM. Role of smoking in low birth weight. J Reprod Med 2004;49(1):23–7.Google Scholar

Akolekar, R, Syngelaki, A, Poon, L, Wright, D, Nicolaides, KH. Competing risks model in early screening for preeclampsia by biophysical and biochemical markers. Fetal Diagn Ther 2013;33(1):8–15.Google Scholar

Ananth, CV, Peltier, MR, Chavez, MR, Kirby, RS, Getahun, D, Vintzileos, AM. Recurrence of ischemic placental disease. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110(1):128–33.Google Scholar

Alfirevic, Z, Stampalija, T, Gyte, GM. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in normal pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(8):CD001450.Google Scholar

Alfirevic, Z, Milan, SJ, Livio, S. Caesarean section versus vaginal delivery for preterm birth in singletons. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;9:CD000078.Google Scholar

Boers, KE, Vijgen, SM, Bijlenga, D, van der Post, JA, Bekedam, DJ, Kwee, A, et al. Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: Randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT). BMJ 2010;341:c7087.Google Scholar

Lees, C, Marlow, N, Van Wassenaer, A, et al. The Trial of Randomized Umbilical and Fetal Flow in Europe (TRUFFLE) study: Two year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes. Lancet 2015;385:2162–72.Google Scholar

Thornton, JG, Hornbuckle, J, Vail, A, Spiegelhalter, DJ, Levene, M. Infant wellbeing at 2 years of age in the Growth Restriction Intervention Trial (GRIT): Multicentred randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004;364(9433):513–20.Google Scholar

Egger, M, Juni, P, Bartlett, C, Holenstein, F, Sterne, J. How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study. Health Technol Assess 2003;7(1):1–76.Google Scholar

Friedman, AM, Cleary, KL. Prediction and prevention of ischemic placental disease. Semin Perinatol 2014;38(3):177–82.Google Scholar

Khan, K. The CROWN initiative: Journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women’s health. Obstet Gynecol 2014;124(3):487–8.Google Scholar

Wadhwa, PD, Buss, C, Entringer, S, Swanson, JM. Developmental origins of health and disease: Brief history of the approach and current focus on epigenetic mechanisms. Semin Reprod Med 2009;27(5):358–68.Google Scholar

Moss, AJ, Francis, CW, Ryan, D. Collaborative clinical trials. N Engl J Med 2011;364(9):789–91.Google Scholar

Kenyon, S, Pike, K, Jones, DR, Brocklehurst, P, Marlow, N, Salt, A, et al. Childhood outcomes after prescription of antibiotics to pregnant women with preterm rupture of the membranes: 7-year follow-up of the ORACLE I trial. Lancet 2008;372(9646):1310–18.Google Scholar

Roex, A, Nikpoor, P, Van, Eerd, Hodyl, N, Dekker, G. Serial plotting on customised fundal height charts results in doubling of the antenatal detection of small for gestational age fetuses in nulliparous women. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynecol 2012;52:78–82.Google Scholar

Gardosi, J, Francis, A. Controlled trial of fundal height measurement plotted on customised antenatal growth charts. BJOG 1999;106:309–17.Google Scholar

Chang, TC, Robson, SC, Boys, RJ, Spencer, JA. Prediction of the small for gestational age infant: Which ultrasonic measurement is best? Obstet Gynecol 1992;80:1030–8.Google Scholar

Coomarasamy, A, Connock, M, Thornton, JG, Khan, KS. Accuracy of ultrasound biometry in the prediction of macrosomia: A systematic quantitative review. BJOG 2005;112(11):1461–6.Google Scholar

Chauhan, SP, Magann, EF. Screening for fetal growth restriction. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006;49:284–94.Google Scholar

Alfirevic, Z, Stampalija, T, Medley, N. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in normal pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD001450. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001450.pub4.Google Scholar

Morris, RK, Malin, G, Robson, SC, Kleijnen, J, Zamora, J, Khan, KS. Fetal umbilical artery Doppler to predict compromise of fetal/neonatal wellbeing in high-risk populations: systematic review and bivariate meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;37:135–42.Google Scholar

Serra, V, Moulden, M, Bellver, J, Redman, CW. The value of the short-term fetal heart rate variation for timing the delivery of the growth-retarded fetuses. BJOG 2008;115:1101–7.Google Scholar

Yagel, S, Kivilevitch, Z, Cohen, SM, Valsky, DV, Messing, B, Shen, O, et al. The fetal venous system, Part II: Ultrasound evaluation of the fetus with congenital venous system malformation or developing circulatory compromise. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;36:93–111.Google Scholar

Thornton, JG, Lilford, RJ. Do we need randomised trials of antenatal tests of fetal wellbeing? BJOG 1993; 100:197–200.Google Scholar

The GRIT Study Group. A randomised trial of timed delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: Short term outcomes and Bayesian interpretation. BJOG 2003;110:27–32.Google Scholar

The GRIT Study Group. Infant wellbeing at 2 years of age in the Growth Restriction Intervention trial (GRIT): A multicentred randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004;364:513–19.Google Scholar

Walker, D-M, Marlow, N, Upstone, L, Gross, H. Hornbuckle, J, Vail, A, Wolke, D, Thornton, JG on behalf of the GRIT Study Group. The Growth Restriction Intervention Trial (GRIT): Long-term outcomes in a randomised trial of timing of delivery in fetal growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;204(1):341–9.Google Scholar

Boers, K, Bijlenga, D, Vijgen, S, Van der Post, J, Bekedam, D, Kwee, A, Van der Salm, P, Van Pampus, M, Spaanderman, M, De Boer, K, Bremer, H, Duvekot, J, Hasaart, T, Delemarre, F, Bloemenkamp, K, Van Meir, C, Willekes, C, Wijnen, E, Rijken, M, le Cessie, S, Roumen, F, Thornton, JG, Van Lith, J, Mol, BW, Scherjon, S (2011) Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term (the DIGITAT trial). BMJ 2011;342:35.Google Scholar

Boers, KE, Van Wyk, L, Van der Post, JAM, et al. Neonatal morbidity after induction vs expectant monitoring in intrauterine growth restriction at term: A subanalysis of the DIGITAT RCT. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:344.e1–7.Google Scholar

Lees, CC, Marlow, N, Van Wassenaer-Leemhuis, A, et al. for the TRUFFLE study group. Two year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction (TRUFFLE): A randomised trial. Lancet 2015;385:2162–72.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin no 134: Fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121(5):1122–33.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RCOG) Guideline Committee. The investigation and management of the small for gestational age fetus. Green top guideline No. 31. Jan 2014 www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg31/.Google Scholar

New Zealand Maternal and Fetal Medicine Network (NZMFMN) Guideline for the management of suspected small for gestational age singleton pregnancies and infants after 34 weeks gestation. 2014 www.asum.com.au/newsite/Files/Documents/Resources/NZMFM%20SGA%20Guideline_September%202013.pdf.Google Scholar

Health Service Executive (Ireland). Fetal growth restriction – recognition, diagnosis and management. 2014 www.hse.ie/eng/about/Who/clinical/natclinprog/obsandgynaeprogramme/29-_Fetal_Growth_Restriction-IUGR_CPG_final_.pdf.Google Scholar

Nederlandse Vereniging voor Obstetrie & Gynaecologie (NVOG). Foetale Groeibeperking 2008. http://nvog-documenten.nl/index.php?pagina=/richtlijn/item/pagina.php&richtlijn_id=828.Google Scholar

Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Canada (SOGC) Intrauterine growth restriction: screening, diagnosis and management. 2013 http://sogc.org/guidelines/intrauterine-growth-restriction-screening-diagnosis-management/.Google Scholar

Papageorghiou, AT, Ohuma EO, Altman DG, Todros T, Cheikh Ismail L, Lambert A, Jaffer YA, Bertino E, Gravett MG, Purwar M, Noble JA, Pang R, Victora CG, Barros FC, Carvalho M, Salomon LJ, Bhutta ZA, Kennedy SH, Villar J; International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century (INTERGROWTH-21st). International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Lancet 2014 Sep 6;384(9946):869–79.Google Scholar

Papageorghiou, AT, Ohuma EO, Gravett MG, Hirst J, da Silveira MF, Lambert A, Carvalho M, Jaffer YA, Altman DG, Noble JA, Bertino E, Purwar M, Pang R, Cheikh Ismail L, Victora C, Bhutta ZA, Kennedy SH, Villar J; International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century (INTERGROWTH-21st). International standards for symphysis-fundal height based on serial measurements from the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project: prospective cohort study in eight countries. BMJ 2016 Nov 7;355:i5662.Google Scholar

Kiserud, T, Piaggio G, Carroli G, Widmer M, Carvalho J, Neerup Jensen L, Giordano D, Cecatti JG, Abdel Aleem H, Talegawkar SA, Benachi A, Diemert A, Tshefu Kitoto A, Thinkhamrop J, Lumbiganon P, Tabor A, Kriplani A, Gonzalez Perez R, Hecher K, Hanson MA, Gülmezoglu AM, Platt LD. The World Health Organization fetal growth charts: A multinational longitudinal study of ultrasound biometric measurements and estimated fetal weight. PLoS Med 2017 Jan 24;14(1):e1002220.Google Scholar

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Hypertension in pregnancy: The management of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy. 2010 www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg107.Google Scholar

Magee, LA, Pels, A, Helewa, M, Rey, E, Von Dadelszen, P, Hypertension Guideline Committee. Prediction and prevention. In: Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: Executive summary. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014 May;36(5):425–6.Google Scholar

World Health Organization (WHO). WHO recommendations for the prevention and treatment of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. 2011. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789241548335_eng.pdf.Google Scholar

Askie, LM, Duley, L Henderson-Smart, DJ, Stewart, LA, on behalf of the PARIS Collaborative Group. (2007) Antiplatelet agents for prevention of pre-eclampsia: A meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet 2007;369:1791–8.Google Scholar

Dugoff, L, Hobbins, JC, Malone, FD, Vidaver, J, Sullivan, L, Canick, JA, et al. Quad screen as a predictor of adverse pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106 (2):260–7.Google Scholar

Dugoff, L. First- and second-trimester maternal serum markers for aneuploidy and adverse obstetric outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:1052–61.Google Scholar

Alfirevic, Z, Stampalija, T, Gyte, GML. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013, Issue 11. Art. No.: CD007529. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007529.pub3.Google Scholar

Calvert, JP, Crean, EE, Newcombe, RG, Pearson, JF. Antenatal screening by measurement of symphysis-fundus height. BMJ 1982;285:846.Google Scholar

Quaranta, P, Currell, R, Redman, CW, Robinson, JS. Prediction of small-for-dates infants by measurement of symphysial-fundal-height. BJOG 1981;88(2):115–19.Google Scholar

Robert, PJ, Ho, JJ, Valliapan, J, Sivasangari, S. Symphysial fundal height (SFH) measurement in pregnancy for detecting abnormal fetal growth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012, Issue 7. Art. No.: CD008136. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008136.pub2.Google Scholar

Unterscheider, J, Geary, MP, Daly, S, McAuliffe, FM, Kennelly, MM, Dornan, J, et al. The customised fetal growth potential: A standard for Ireland. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013 Jan;166(1):14–17.Google Scholar

Melamed, N, Ray, JG, Shah, PS, Berger, H, Kingdom, JC. Should we use customized fetal growth percentiles in urban Canada? J Obstet Gynaecol Canada 2014;36(2):164–70.Google Scholar

Van Wyk, L, Boers, KE, Van der Post, JAM, et al. Effects on (neuro)developmental and behavioral outcome at 2 years of age of induced labor compared with expectant management in intrauterine growth-restricted infants: Long-term outcomes of the DIGITAT trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:406.e1–7.Google Scholar