Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T16:17:07.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - From Mark S. Granovetter, “The Strength of Weak Ties”

from III - Later Foundations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2021

Edited by
Mario L. Small ,
Brea L. Perry ,
Bernice Pescosolido  and
Edward B. Smith
Mario L. Small
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Brea L. Perry
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington
Bernice Pescosolido
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington
Edward B. Smith
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Illinois
Get access

Summary

Mark Granovetter’s 1973 “The Strength of Weak Ties” (SWT) is arguably the most influential paper in sociology. The great appeal of SWT is that it links micro-processes to macro patterns, yielding a provocative, non-obvious prediction. While mostly a theory paper combining insights from multiple research areas, he offered primary empirical evidence of SWT from his labor market research on how network processes affect job finding. My goal in this brief review is to assess the current state of knowledge in labor market studies of the SWT. I particularly focus on the progress that has been made toward bolstering the causal status of SWT theory in the labor market context. I highlight three theoretical and empirical challenges that have hampered progress in in this respect: the issue of baselines, the nature of the dependent variable, and the complexity of the causal chain. I conclude by discussing promising avenues for further research in this domain.

Keywords

weak tiesstrong tiesjob findingsocial networksjob contactsjob search networks
Type
Chapter
Information
Personal Networks
Classic Readings and New Directions in Egocentric Analysis
 , pp. 240 - 250
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnes, John A. 1969. “Networks and Political Process,” in Social Networks in Urban Situations, edited by Mitchell, J. C.. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Marshall. 1970. “Sociometric Location and Innovativeness.” American Sociological Review 35: 267–82.Google Scholar
Berscheid, Ellen, and Walster, Elaine. 1969. Interpersonal Attraction. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Boissevain, Jeremy. 1968. “The Place of Non-Groups in the Social Sciences.” Man 3: 542–56.Google Scholar
Bott, Elizabeth. 1957. Family and Social Network. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Bramel, Dana. 1969. “Interpersonal Attraction, Hostility and Perception,” in Experimental Social Psychology, edited by Mills, Judson. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Brown, David. 1967. The Mobile Professors. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger. 1965. Social Psychology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S. 1960. “The Mathematical Study of Small Groups,” in Mathematical Thinking in the Measurement of Behavior, edited by Solomon, H.. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S., Katz, Elihu, and Menzel, Herbert. 1966. Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. Indianapolis, MN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1961. Who Governs? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, J. Clarence. 1966. Neighborhood Groups and Urban Renewal. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, James A. 1963. “Structural Balance, Mechanical Solidarity and Interpersonal Relations.” American Journal of Sociology 68: 444–62.Google Scholar
Davis, James A. 1967. “Clustering and Structural Balance in Graphs.” Human Relations 20: 181–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, James A. 1969. “Social Structures and Cognitive Structures,” in Theories of Cognitive Consistency, edited by R. P. Abelson et al. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Davis, James A. 1970. “Clustering and Hierarchy in Interpersonal Relations.” American Sociological Review 35: 843–52.Google Scholar
Davis, James A., Holland, P., and Leinhardt, S.. 1971. “Comment.” American Sociological Review 36: 309–11.Google Scholar
Davis, James A., and Leinhardt, S.. 1971. “The Structure of Positive Interpersonal Relations in Small Groups,” in Sociological Theories in Progress, vol. 2, edited by Berger, J., Zelditch, M., and Anderson, B.. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Epstein, Alan L. 1969. “The Network and Urban Social Organization,” in Social Networks in Urban Situations, edited by Mitchell, J. C.. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Frankenberg, Ronald. 1965. Communities in Britain. Baltimore, MD: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gans, Herbert. 1962. The Urban Villagers. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark S. 1970. “Changing Jobs: Channels of Mobility Information in a Suburban Community.” Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Harary, Frank. 1965. “Graph Theory and Group Structure,” in Readings in Mathematical Psychology, vol. 2, edited by Luce, R., Bush, R., and Galanter, E.. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Frank., Harary, Norman, R., and Cartwright, D.. 1965. Structural Models. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Heider, Fritz. 1958. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Holland, Paul, and Leinhardt, S.. 1970. “Detecting Structure in Sociometric Data.” American Journal of Sociology 76: 492–513.Google Scholar
Holland, Paul, and Leinhardt, S.. 1971a. “Transitivity in Structural Models of Small Groups.” Comparative Group Studies 2: 107–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, Paul, and Leinhardt, S.. 1971b. Masking: The Structural Implications of Measurement Error in Sociometry. Mimeographed. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie-Mellon University.Google Scholar
Homans, George. 1950. The Human Group. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Jane. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Kapferer, Brian. 1969. “Norms and the Manipulation of Relationships in a Work Context,” in Social Networks in Urban Situations, edited by Mitchell, J. C.. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Elihu, and Lazarsfeld, Paul F.. 1955. Personal Influence. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Kerckhoff, Alan C., and Back, Kurt W.. 1968. The June Bug: A Study of Hysterical Contagion. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Kerckhoff, Alan C., Back, Kurt, and Miller, Norman. 1965. “Sociometric Patterns in Hysterical Contagion.” Sociometry 28: 2–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keyes, Langley C. 1969. The Rehabilitation Planning Game. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Korte, Charles. 1967. Small-World Study (Los Angeles): Data Analysis. Mimeographed. Poughkeepsie, NY: Vassar College.Google Scholar
Korte, Charles, and Milgram, Stanley. 1970. “Acquaintance Networks between Racial Groups.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 15: 101–8.Google Scholar
Laumann, Edward. 1968. Interlocking and Radial Friendship Networks: A Cross- Sectional Analysis. Mimeographed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Laumann, Edward, and Schuman, H.. 1967. “Open and Closed Structures.” Paper prepared for the 1967 ASA meeting. Mimeographed.Google Scholar
Leinhardt, Samuel. 1972. “Developmental Change in the Sentiment Structure of Childrens’ Groups.” American Sociological Review 37: 202–12.Google Scholar
Mayer, Adrian. 1966. “The Significance of Quasi-Groups in the Study of Complex Societies,” in The Social Anthropology of Complex Societies, edited by Banton, M.. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Mayer, Phillip. 1961. Townsmen or Tribesmen? Capetown: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mazur, Allan. 1971. “Comment.” American Sociological Review 36: 308–9.Google Scholar
Milgram, Stanley. 1967. “The Small-World Problem.” Psychology Today 1: 62–7.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. Clyde. 1969. Social Networks in Urban Situations. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Newcomb, Theodore M. 1961. The Acquaintance Process. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Parnes, Herbert. 1954. Research on Labor Mobility. New York: Social Science Research Council.Google Scholar
Precker, Joseph. 1952. “Similarity of Valuings as a Factor in Selection of Peers and Near-Authority Figures.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 47(suppl.): 406–14.Google Scholar
Rapoport, Anatol. 1953a. “Spread of Information through a Population with Socio- Structural Bias. I. Assumption of Transitivity.” Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 15: 523–33.Google Scholar
Rapoport, Anatol. 1953b. “Spread of Information through a Population with Socio-Structural Bias. II. Various Models with Partial Transitivity.” Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 15: 535–46.Google Scholar
Rapoport, Anatol. 1954. “Spread of Information through a Population with Socio-Structural Bias. III. Suggested Experimental Procedures.” Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 16: 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapoport, Anatol. 1963. “Mathematical Models of Social Interaction,” in Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, vol. 2, edited by Luce, R., Bush, R., and Galanter, E.. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rapoport, A., and Horvath, W.. 1961. “A Study of a Large Sociogram.” Behavioral Science 6: 279–91.Google Scholar
Rogers, Everett. 1962. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Shapero, Albert, Howell, Richard, and Tombaugh, James. 1965. The Structure and Dynamics of the Defense R & D Industry. Menlo Park, CA: Stanford Research Institute.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1950. The Sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Solomonoff, Ray, and Rapoport, A.. 1951. “Connectivity of Random Nets.” Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 13: 107–17.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Harry Stack. 1953. The Interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1969. Community: City: Urbanization. Mimeographed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Travers, Jeffrey, and Milgram, S.. 1969. “An Experimental Study of the ‘Small-World’ Problem.” Sociometry 32: 425–43.Google Scholar
Wirth, Louis. 1938. “Urbanism as a Way of Life.” American Journal of Sociology 44: 1–24.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×