Abel, R. (1974). “A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society.” Law and Society Review 8(2): 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abel, R. (ed.) (1982). “The Contradictions of Informal Justice,” in The Politics of Informal Justice: The American Experience, Vol. 1. New York, Academic Press, pp. 267–320.

Abel, R. (ed.) (1995). “What We Talk about When We Talk about Law,” in The Law & Society Reader. New York, London, New York University Press, pp. 1–12.

Abel, R. (2005). Comments on manuscript. Unpublished. On file with author.

,ADR-Chambers (1998a). ADR Chambers. http://www.adrchambers.com (last viewed August 8, 2008).

,ADR-Chambers (1998b). ADR Chambers: Mediation. Canada, ADR Chambers. http://www.adrchambers.com/mediationintro.htm (last viewed August 8, 2008).

Alberstein, M. (2002). Pragmatism and the Law: From Philosophy to Dispute Resolution. Aldershot, Ashgate.Google Scholar

Alexander, N. (2002). “Global Trends in Mediation.” World Arbitration and Mediation Report 13: 272.Google Scholar

Alfieri, A. (1991). “Reconstructive Poverty Law Practice: Learning Lessons of Client Narrative.” The Yale Law Journal 100: 2107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, V. A. (2003) “Alternative Dispute Resolution and Professional Responsibility in South Carolina: A Changing Landscape.” South Carolina Law Review 55: 191.Google Scholar

,Attorney-General-of-Ontario (1999). Regulation to Amend Regulation 194 of the Revised Regulations of Ontario 1990 Made under the Courts of Justice Act. Ministry of the Attorney General of Ontario. http://www.attorneygeneral. jus.gov.on.ca/english/courts/manmed/notice.asp (last viewed August 8, 2008).

Auerbach, J. (1983). Justice without Law?New York, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Babcock, L. and Laschever, S. (2003). Women Don't Ask: Negotiation and the Gender Divide. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Baldwin, J. (1997). Monitoring the Rise of the Small Claims Limit: Litigants' Experiences of Different Forms of Adjudication. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Bales, R. F. (1951). Interaction Process Analysis. Cambridge, MA, Addison-Wesley Press, Inc.Google Scholar

Banakar, R. (2003). Merging Law and Sociology. Glienicke, Berlin, Madison, WI, Galda+Wilch Verlag.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, London, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. and Walters, R. (1963). Social Learning and Personality Development. New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Barrett-Howard, E. and Tyler, T. (1986). “Procedural Justice as a Criterion in Allocation Decisions.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50: 296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartlett, K. T. (1990). “Feminist Legal Methods.” Harvard Law Review 103: 829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barton, T. D. (1999). “Therapeutic Jurisprudence, Preventive Law, and Creative Problem Solving: An Essay on Harnessing Emotion and Human Connection.” Psychology, Public Policy and Law 5: 921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baruch Bush, R. (1997). “What Do We Need a Mediator For?: Mediation's ‘Value-Added’ for Negotiators.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 12: 1.Google Scholar

Burns, T. (1992). Erving Goffman. London. Routeledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bush, R. B. and Folger, J. (1994). The Promise of Mediation: Responding to Conflict through Empowerment and Recognition. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Bell, S. and Richard, L. (1992). “Anatomy of a Lawyer: Personality and Long-Term Career Satisfaction,” in Full Disclosure: Do You Really Want to Be a Lawyer?Princeton, NJ, Peterson's Guides, pp. 150–62.Google Scholar

Bentham, J. (1843). “Scottish Reform,” in The Works of Jeremy Bentham (Bowring, S. J., ed.) Vol. 5. Edinburgh, William Tate, pp. 1–54.Google Scholar

Bernstein, B. (1971). Class, Codes and Control. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bethel, , , C. A. and Singer, L. R. (1982). “Mediation: A New Remedy for Cases of Domestic Violence.” Vermont Law Review 7: 15.Google Scholar

Bibas, S. and Bierschbach, R. A. (2004). “Integrating Remorse and Apology into Criminal Procedure.” Yale Law Journal 114(October): 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binder, D., Bergman, P. and Price, S. (1991). Lawyers as Counselors: A Client-Centered Approach. St. Paul, West Coast Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Binder, D. and Price, S. (1977). Legal Interviewing and Counseling: A Client Centered Approach. St. Paul, MN, West Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Bingham, L., Kim, K. and Raines, S. S. (2002). “Exploring the Role of Representation in Employment Mediation at the USPS.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 17: 341.Google Scholar

Birke, R. (2000). “Evaluation and Facilitation: Moving Past Either/Or.” Journal of Dispute Resolution 2000: 309.Google Scholar

Bloch, M. (1974). “Symbols, Song, Dance and Features of Articulation: Is Religion an Extreme Form of Traditional Authority?” European Archives of Sociology 15: 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boettger, U. (2004). “Efficiency Versus Party Empowerment – Against a Good-Faith Requirement in Mandatory Mediation.” Review of Litigation 23: 1.Google Scholar

Bogoch, B. (1997). “Gendered Lawyering: Difference and Dominance in Lawyer-Client Interaction.” Law and Society Review 31: 677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice. Cambridge, Polity.Google Scholar

Bowman, C. (1999). “Women and the Legal Profession.” American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy and Law 7: 149.Google Scholar

Brest, P. (2000). “Skeptical Thoughts: Integrating Problem Solving into Legal Curriculum Faces Uphill Climb.” A. B. A. Dispute Resolution Magazine 20(Summer): 20.Google Scholar

Brinig, M. (1995). “Does Mediation Systematically Disadvantage Women?” William & Mary Journal of Women & the Law 2(Fall): 1.Google Scholar

Brown, H. and Simanowitz, A. (1995). “Alternative Dispute Resolution and Mediation.” Quality in Health Care 4(2): 151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brown, W. (1996). “Constitutions and ‘Survivor Stories': In the ‘Folds of Our Own Discourse’ the Pleasures and Freedoms of Silence.” University of Chicago Law School Roundtable 3: 185.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. (1992). “A Psychologist and the Law.” New York Law School Law Review 37: 173.Google Scholar

Bryan, P. (1992). “Killing Us Softly: Divorce Mediation and the Politics of Power.” Buffalo Law Review 40: 441.Google Scholar

Bush, R. A. B. and Folger, J. P. (1994). The Promise of Mediation: Responding to Conflict through Empowerment and Recognition. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Bush, R. B. (1997). “What Do We Need a Mediator For?: Mediation's ‘Value-Added’ for Negotiators.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 12: 1.Google Scholar

Cahn, N. R. (1992). “Theoretics of Practice: The Integration of Progressive Thought and Action: Styles of Lawyering.” Hastings Law Journal 43: 1039, 1050–54.Google Scholar

Caldon, D. T. (1999). Medical Malpractice Disputes in the Age of Managed Care. Malibu, CA, Strauss Institute for Dispute Resolution, Mediation Information and Resource Center (MIRC). www.mediate.com/articles/caldon.cfm?plain=t (last viewed August 9, 1999).Google Scholar

Cameron, J. (1999). “Adjusting the Scales of Justice.” Canadian Insurance June 18, 1999.

Campbell, C. (1976). “Lawyers and Their Public,” in Lawyers in Their Social Setting (MacCormick, D., ed.). Edinburgh, Green & Son Ltd., p. 209.Google Scholar

Casper, J. (1978). “Having Their Day in Court: Defendant Evaluations of the Fairness of Their Treatment.” Law and Society Review 12: 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casper, J. E. A. (1988). “Procedural Justice in Felony Cases.” Law and Society Review 22: 483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christiansen, V. (1997). “The Role of Reconciliation in the Mediation Process: Lessons from a Traditional Chinese Village.” Dispute Resolution Journal 52(Fall): 66.Google Scholar

Clement, , , J. A. and Schwebel, A. I. (1993). “A Research Agenda for Divorce Mediation: The Creation of Second Order Knowledge to Inform Legal Policy.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 9: 95.Google Scholar

,= Canadian Medical Protection Association (1999). What Is the CMPA? The Canadian Medical Protection Association. www.cmpa.org/english/whatis-e.cfm (last viewed August 12, 1999).

Cobb, S. (1997). “The Domestication of Violence in Mediation.” Law and Society Review 31(3): 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, A. (2003). “Gender: An (Un)Useful Category of Prescriptive Negotiation Analysis?”Texas Journal of Women and the Law 13: 169.Google Scholar

Comaroff, J. L. (1975). “Talking Politics: Oratory and Authority in a Tswana Chiefdom,” in Political Language and Oratory in Traditional Society (Bloch, M., ed.). London and New York, Academic Press, pp. 141–61.Google Scholar

Comaroff, J. L. and Roberts, S. (1981). Rules and Processes: The Cultural Logic of Dispute in an African Context. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Conley, J. and O'Barr, W. (1988). “Hearing the Hidden Agenda: The Ethnographic Investigation of Procedure.” Law and Contemporary Problems 51(4): 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conley, J. and O'Barr, W. (1990). Rules Versus Relationships: The Ethnography of Legal Discourse. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

,CPSO (1999a). General College Information. The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. http://www.cpso.on.ca/about_the_college/geninfo.htm (last viewed August 8, 2008).

,CPSO (1999b). Complaints Against Md's. The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. http://www.cpso.on.ca/Info_Public/factcomp.htm (last viewed on August 8, 2008).

Craver, C. B. and Barnes, D. W. (1999). “Gender, Risk Taking and Negotiation Performance.” Michigan Journal of Gender and Law 5: 299.Google Scholar

Crawford, M. (1996). “Rent-a-Judge Business Taking Flight in Ontario.” The Financial Post, Toronto, 8.Google Scholar

Cunningham, C. (1989). A Tale of Two Clients: Thinking about Law as Language. Michigan Law Review, 87: 2459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cunningham, C. (1992). “The Lawyer as Translator, Representation as Text: Towards an Ethnography of Legal Discourse.” Cornell Law Review 77: 1298.Google Scholar

Currie, C. (1998). “Mediation and Medical Practice Disputes.” Mediation Quarterly 15(3): 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daicoff, S. (1997). “Lawyer, Know Thyself: A Review of Empirical Research on Attorney Attributes Bearing on Professionalism.” American University Law Review 46: 1337.Google Scholar

Daicoff, S. (1998). “Asking Leopards to Change Their Spots: Should Lawyers Change? A Critique of Solutions to Problems with Professionalism by Reference to Empirically-Derived Attorney Personality Attributes.” The Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 11: 547.Google Scholar

Damaska, M. (1986). The Faces of Justice and State Authority: A Comparative Approach to the Legal Process. New Haven, CT, Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Daniel, A. E., Burn, R. J. and Horarik, S. (1999). “Patients' Complaints about Medical Practice.” Medical Journal of Australia 170: 598–602.Google ScholarPubMed

Dauer, E. and Marcus, L. (1997). “Adapting Mediation to Link Resolution of Medical Malpractice Disputes with Health Care Quality Improvement.” Law and Contemporary Problems 60(1–2): 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, P. (1991). “Contextual Legal Criticism: A Demonstration Exploring Hierarchy and ‘Feminine’ Style.” New York University Law Review 66: 1635.Google Scholar

Deason, E. (2001). “Reply: The Quest for Uniformity in Mediation Confidentiality: Foolish Consistency or Crucial Predictability?”Marquette Law Review 85(Fall): 79.Google Scholar

Delgado, R., Dunn, C. and Hubbert, D. (1985). “Fairness and Formality: Minimizing the Risk of Prejudice in Alternative Dispute Resolution.” Wisconsin Law Review 6: 1359–404.Google Scholar

Des Rosiers, N., Feldthusen, B. and Hankivsky, O. (1998). “Legal Compensation for Sexual Violence: Therapeutic Consequences and Consequences for the Judicial System.” Psychology, Public Policy and Law 4(1–2): 433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dingwall, R., Greatbatch, D. and Ruggerone, L. (1998). “Gender and Interaction in Divorce Mediation.” Mediation Quarterly 15(4): 277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dingwall, R. (1988). “Empowerment or Enforcement? Some Questions about Power and Control in Divorce Mediation,” in Divorce, Mediation and the Legal Process (Dingwall, R. and Eekelaar, J. M., eds.). Oxford, UK, Clarendon, pp. 150–67.Google Scholar

,Dispute-Resolution (1999). Dispute Resolution Home Page. www.dispres.com (last viewed September 17, 1999).

DuBois, E. C., Dunlap, M. C., Gilligan, C. J. and Menkel-Meadow, C. J. (1985). “Feminist Discourse, Moral Values, and the Law – A Conversation.” Buffalo Law Review 34(1): 11.Google Scholar

Dubow, F. L. and McEwen, C. (1993). “Community Boards: An Analytic Profile,” in The Possibility of Popular Justice: A Case Study of Community Mediation in the United States (Merry, S. and Milner, N., eds.). Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan Press, pp. 125–68.Google Scholar

Duryee, M. (1992a). “Mandatory Mediation: Myth and Reality.” Family and Conciliation Courts Review 30: 507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duryee, M. (1992b). “Mandatory Court Mediation: Demographic Summary and Consumer Evaluation of One Court Service.” Family and Conciliaiton Courts Review 30: 260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Easterbrook, J. (1996). “Resolving Health Care Disputes.” Solicitors Journal 140(16): 410.Google Scholar

Edwards, H. T. (1986). “Commentary: Alternative Dispute Resolution: Panacea or Anathema?” Harvard Law Review 99: 668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eichner, M. (2001). “On Postmodern Feminist Legal Theory.” Harvard Civil Rights – Civil Liberties Law Review 36(Winter): 1.Google Scholar

Ellman, S. (1993). “The Ethic of Care as an Ethic for Lawyers.” Georgetown Law Journal 81(August): 2665.Google Scholar

Engel, D. (1984). “The Oven Bird's Song: Insiders, Outsiders and Personal Injuries in an American Community.” Law and Society Review 18(4): 551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epstein, C. F. (1988). Deceptive Distinctions: Sex, Gender, and the Social Order. New Haven, CT, Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Evans, M. (2001). “Women and Mediation: Toward a Formulation of an Interdisciplinary Empirical Model to Determine Equity in Dispute Resolution.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 17(1): 145.Google Scholar

Ewick, P. and Silbey, S. (1998). The Common Place of Law. Chicago, IL, Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Eyster, M. J. (1996). “Clinical Teaching, Ethical Negotiation, and Moral Judgment.” Nebraska Law Review 75: 752.Google Scholar

Farber, H. S. and White, M. J. (1994). “A Comparison of Formal and Informal Dispute Resolution in Medical Malpractice.” Journal of Legal Studies 23(2): 777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farber, S. R. and Rickenberg, M. (1999). “Under-Confident Women and Over-Confident Men: Gender and Sense of Competence in a Simulated Negotiation.” Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 11: 271.Google Scholar

Fassnacht, G. (1982). Theory and Practice of Observing Behavior. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar

Felstiner, W., Abel, R. and Sarat, A. (1980–81). “The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming Claiming.” Law and Society Review 15(3–4): 631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Felstiner, W. and Sarat, A. (1992). “Enactments of Power: Negotiating Reality and Responsibility in Lawyer-Client Interactions.” Cornell Law Review 77: 1447.Google Scholar

Ferris, L. (2004). “Using Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Preventive Law to Examine Disputants' Best Interests in Mediating Cases About Physicians' Practices: A Guide for Medical Regulators.” Medicine and Law 23: 183.Google ScholarPubMed

Fineman, M. (1988). “Dominant Discourse, Professional Language, and Legal Change in Child Custody Decisionmaking.” Harvard Law Review 101: 727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiss, O. (1964). “Against Settlement.” Yale Law Journal 93: 1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flick, U. (1992). “Triangulation Revisited – Strategy of Validation or Alternative?” Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 22(2): 175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Folberg, J., Golann, D., Kloppenberg, L. and Stipanowich, T. (2005). Resolving Disputes: Theory, Practice, and Law. New York, Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar

Folberg, J. and Taylor, A. (1984). Mediation: A Comprehensive Guide to Resolving Conflicts without Litigation. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Folger, J. P. and Bush, R. A. B. (1996). “Transformative Mediation and Third-Party Intervention: Ten Hallmarks of a Transformative Approach to Practice.” Mediation Quarterly 13: 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forehand, S. (1999). “Note & Comment: Helping the Medicine Go Down: How a Spoonful of Mediation Can Alleviate the Problems of Medical Malpractice Litigation.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 14: 907.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1981). The History of Sexuality. Harmondsworth, Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Fuller, L. L. (1971). “Mediation: Its Forms and Functions.” South California Law Review 44: 305.Google Scholar

Fuller, L. L. (1978). “The Forms and Limits of Adjudication.” Harvard Law Review 92: 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galanter, M. (1974). “Why the ‘Haves' Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change.” Law and Society Review 9: 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galanter, M. (1986). “The Day after the Litigation Explosion.” Maryland Law Review 46: 3.Google Scholar

Galanter, M. and Cahill, M. (1994). “‘Most Cases Settle’: Judicial Promotion and Regulation of Settlements.” Stanford Law Review 46(6): 1339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galton, E. (1994). Representing Clients in Mediation. Dallas, TX, American Lawyer Media.Google Scholar

Garfinkel, H. (1984). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge, Polity.Google Scholar

Gaskell, G. and Bauer, M. (2000). Social Research Design Course – Mi421. London, London School of Economics Methodology Institute. Unpublished lecture series.

Gatter, R. (2004). “Institutionally Sponsored Mediation and the Emerging Medical Trust Movement in the U.S.” Medicine and Law 23: 201.Google ScholarPubMed

Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar

Genn, H. (1995). “Access to Just Settlements: The Case of Medical Negligence,” in Reform of Civil Procedure: Essays on “Access to Justice” (Zuckerman, A. and Cranston, R., eds.). New York, Oxford, Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press, pp. 393–412.Google Scholar

Genn, H. (1999). Paths to Justice: What People Do and Think about Going to Law. Oxford, Hart.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge, Polity Press.Google Scholar

Gilkerson, C. (1992). “Poverty Law Narratives: The Critical Practice and Theory of Receiving and Translating Client Stories.” Hastings Law Journal 43: 861.Google Scholar

Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gitchell, R. L. and Plattner, A. (1999). “Mediation: A Viable Alternative to Litigation for Medical Malpractice Cases.” Depaul Journal of Health Care Law 2(3): 421.Google Scholar

Glasser, C. and Roberts, S. (1993). “Dispute Resolution: Civil Justice and Its Alternatives: Introduction.” Modern Law Review 56(3): 277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goffman, E. (1961a). Asylums. Harmondsworth, Penguin.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1961b). Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction. Indianapolis, IN, Bobbs-Merill.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1971). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Harmondsworth, Penguin.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York, Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Golann, D. (2000). “Variations in Mediation: How – and Why – Legal Mediators Change Styles in the Course of a Case.” Journal of Dispute Resolution 2000: 41.Google Scholar

Golann, D. (2002). “Is Legal Mediation a Process of Repair – or Separation? An Empirical Study, and Its Implications.” Harvard Negotiation Law Review 7(Spring): 301.Google Scholar

Gold, N. (1991). “Considering Dispute Resolution: A Research Prospectus,” in A Handbook of Dispute Resolution: ADR in Action (Mackie, K., ed.). London, New York, Routeledge and Sweet& Maxwell, pp. 267–77.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. B., Sander, F. E. A. and Rogers, N. H. (1999). Dispute Resolution: Negotiation, Mediation and Other Processes. Gaithersburg, MD, Aspen Law & Business.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S., Sander, F. and Rogers, N. (eds.) (1992). Dispute Resolution Negotiation, Mediation, and Other Processes. Boston, Little Brown and Company.

Gordon, E. (2000). “Attorneys' Negotiation Strategies in Mediation: Business as Usual?” Mediation Quarterly 17(4): 377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gordon, E. E. (1999). “Why Attorneys Support Mandatory Mediation.” Judicature 82: 224.Google Scholar

Griffiths, J. (1986). “What Do Dutch Lawyers Actually Do in Divorce Cases?” Law and Society Review 20: 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grillo, T. (1991). “The Mediation Alternative: Process Dangers for Women.” Yale Law Journal 100(6): 1545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gulliver, P. (1979). Disputes and Negotiations: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar

Guthrie, C. (2001). “The Lawyer's Philosophical Map and the Disputant's Perceptual Map: Impediments to Facilitative Mediation and Lawyering.” Harvard Negotiation Law Review 6(Spring): 145.Google Scholar

Guthrie, C. (2002). “Symposium: Procedural Justice Research and the Paucity of Trials.” Journal of Dispute Resolution 2002: 127.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1981). The Theory of Communicative Action. Boston, Beacon, Cambridge, Polity.Google Scholar

Hafner, J. and Fakouri, M. E. (1984). “Early Recollections of Individuals Preparing for Careers in Clinical Psychology, Dentistry, and Law.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 24: 236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hampshire, S. (1999). Justice Is Conflict. London, Duckworth.Google Scholar

Harnick, C. (1997). Improving Access to Our Courts: Notes for Remarks by Attorney General Charles Harnick. Canadian Bar Association – Ontario. Stitt Feld Handy Houston. http://www.adr.ca/news/harnick013197.asp (last viewed August 13, 1999).

Hart, H. M., Jr. and Sacks, A. (1994). The Legal Process: Basic Problems in the Making and Application of Law. Westbury, NY, Foundation Press.Google Scholar

Hensler, D. (1999). “A Research Agenda: What We Need to Know about Court-Connected ADR.” Dispute Resolution Magazine 6(1): 15.Google Scholar

Hensler, D. (2003). “Our Courts, Ourselves: How the Alternative Dispute Resolution Movement Is Re-Shaping Our Legal System.” Penn State Law Review 108(Summer): 165.Google Scholar

Hickson, G., Clayton, E., Githens, P. and Sloan, F. (1992). “Factors That Prompted Families to File Medical Malpractice Claims Following Perinatal Injuries.” JAMA 267(10): 1359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hill, E. (1990). “Alternative Dispute Resolution in a Feminist Voice.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 5: 337.Google Scholar

Hinshaw, L. and Forbes, G. (1993). “Attitudes toward Women and Approaches to Conflict Resolution in College Students in Spain and the United States.” Journal of Social Psychology 133: 865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hobbs, T. and Gable, G. (1998). Coping with Litigation Stress. Physician's News Digest. http://192.41.26.254/law/198.html (last viewed August 20, 1999).

Hosticka, C. (1979). “We Don't Care about What Happened, We Only Care about What Is Going to Happen: Lawyer–Client Negotiations of Reality.” Social Problems 265: 599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hughes, S. H. (1998). “A Closer Look: The Case for a Mediation Privilege Has Not Been Made.” Dispute Resolution Magazine 5(Winter): 14.Google Scholar

Hunting, R. and Neuwirth, G. (1962). Who Sues in New York City?New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Janoff, S. (1991). “The Influence of Legal Education on Moral Reasoning.” Minnesota Law Review 76: 193.Google Scholar

Johnson, S. M. (1997). “A Medical Malpractice Litigator Proposes Mediation.” Dispute Resolution Journal 52(2): 42.Google Scholar

Jones, G. T. (2003). “Fighting Capitulation: A Research Agenda for the Future of Dispute Resolution.” Penn State Law Review 108(Summer): 277.Google Scholar

Kandel, R. (1994). “Power Plays: A Sociolinguistic Study of Inequality in Child Custody Mediation and a Hearsay Analog Solution.” Arizona Law Review 36: 879.Google Scholar

Kelly, J. and Duyree, M. (1995). “Women's and Men's Views of Mediation in Voluntary and Mandatory Mediation Settings.” Family and Conciliation Courts Review 30(1): 35.Google Scholar

Kelly, J. B. (1989). “Mediated and Adversarial Divorce: Respondents' Perceptions of Their Processes and Outcomes.” Mediation Quarterly 24(December): 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, C. (1994). “Are Justice and Harmony Mutually Exclusive? A Response to Professor Nader.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 10: 65.Google Scholar

Klein, K. (2005). “A Judicial Mediator's Perspective: The Impact of Gender on Dispute Resolution: Mediation as a Different Voice.” North Dakota Law Review 81: 771.Google Scholar

Kolb, D. M. (1991). “Women's Work: Peacemaking Behind the Organizational Scene,” in The Dialectics of Disputing: New Perspectives in Organization Conflict (Kolb, D. and Bartunek, J., eds.). Newbury Park, CA, Sage, pp. 64–93.Google Scholar

Kolb, D. M. (1993). “Her Place at the Table: Gender and Negotiation,” in Negotiation: Strategies for Mutual Gain (Hall, L., ed.). Newbury Park, London, Sage, pp. 138–51.Google Scholar

Kolb, D. M. (2000). “More Than Just a Footnote: Constructing a Theoretical Framework for Teaching about Gender in Negotiation.” Negotiation Journal 16(4): 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolb, D. M. (2003). Negotiation Overview. Reader in Gender, Work and Organization (Ely, R. J., Foldy, E. G., and Scully, M. A., eds.). Maldon, MA, Blackwell Publishing, pp. 101–7.Google Scholar

Kolb, D. M. and Coolidge, G. G. (1988). “Her Place at the Table: A Consideration of Gender Issues in Negotiation,” in The Program on Negotiation Working Paper Series 88-5. Boston, Harvard Law School.Google Scholar

Kolb, D. M. and Putnam, L. L. (1997). “Through the Looking Glass: Negotiation Theory Refracted through the Lens of Gender,” in Workplace Dispute Resolution: Directions for the Twenty-First Century (Gleason, S. E., ed.). East Lansing, Michigan State University Press, pp. 231–47.Google Scholar

Kolb, D. M. and Williams, J. (2000). The Shadow Negotiation: How Women Can Master the Hidden Agendas That Determine Bargaining Success. New York, Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Kolb, D. M. and Williams, J. (2003). Everyday Negotiation: Navigating the Hidden Agendas in Bargaining. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Kolb, D., Williams, J. and Frohlinger, C. (2004). Her Place at the Table: A Woman's Guide to Negotiating Five Key Challenges to Leadership Success. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Korobkin, R. and Guthrie, C. (1997). “Psychology, Economics and Settlement: A New Look at the Role of the Lawyer.” Texas Law Review 76: 77.Google Scholar

Kovach, K. (1997). “Good Faith in Mediation: Requested, Recommended or Required: A New Ethic.” South Texas Law Review 38: 575.Google Scholar

Kovach, K. (2001). “New Wine Requires New Wineskins: Transforming Lawyer Ethics for Effective Representation in a Non-Adversarial Approach to Problem Solving: Mediation.” Fordham Urban Law Journal 28(April): 935.Google Scholar

Kovach, K. (2003). “Lawyer Ethics Must Keep Pace with Practice: Plurality in Lawyering Roles Demands Diverse and Innovative Ethical Standards.” Idaho Law Review 39: 399.Google Scholar

Kovach, K. and Love, L. (1998). “Mapping Mediation: The Risks of Riskin's Grid.” Harvard Negotiation Law Review 3: 71.Google Scholar

Kritzer, H. (1984). “The Dimensions of Lawyer-Client Relations: Notes Toward a Theory and a Field Study.” American Bar Foundation Research Journal 9(2, Spring): 409–25.Google Scholar

Kritzer, H. (1990). The Justice Broker: Lawyers and Ordinary Litigation. New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kritzer, H. (1998). “Contingent-Fee Lawyers and Their Clients: Settlement Expectations, Settlement Realities, and Issues of Control in the Lawyer-Client Relationship.” Law and Social Inquiry 23: 795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lacey, N. (2002). Theoretical Paradigms in Legal Research Lecture Series. London, London School of Economics. Unpublished.Google Scholar

LaFree, G. and Rack, C. (1996). “The Effects of Participants' Ethnicity and Gender on Monetary Outcomes in Mediated and Adjudicated Civil Cases.” Law and Society Review 30: 767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lande, J. (1997). “How Will Lawyering and Mediation Practices Transform Each Other?”Florida State University Law Review 24: 839.Google Scholar

Lande, J. (2000). “Toward More Sophisticated Mediation Theory.” Journal of Dispute Resolution 2000: 321.Google Scholar

Lande, J. (2002). “Using Dispute System Design Methods to Promote Good-Faith Participation in Court-Connected Mediation Programs.” UCLA Law Review 50: 69.Google Scholar

Lawrence, J. (2000). “Mediation Advocacy: Partnering with the Mediator.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 15: 425.Google Scholar

Lees, D. (1998). “Justice out of Court: With Our Legal System Clogged with Civil Litigants and Costs Spiralling out of Control, Canadian Firms Have Learnt a Lesson from Their U.S. Counterparts: Mediation Really Is the Better Way.” The Financial Post22–34.Google Scholar

Lehman, W. (1978). “The Pursuit of a Client's Interests.” Michigan Law Review 77: 1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lemert, C. and Branaman, A. (eds.) (1997). The Goffman Reader. Malden, Blackwell Publishers.

Levin, M. S. (2001). “The Propriety of Evaluative Mediation: Concerns about the Nature and Quality of an Evaluative Opinion.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 16: 267.Google Scholar

Liebman, C. B. (2000). “Mediation as Parallel Seminars: Lessons from the Student Takeover of Columbia University's Hamilton Hall.” Negotiation Journal 16: 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lind, E. A. (1998). “Procedural Justice, Disputing, and Reactions to Legal Authorities,” in Everyday Practices and Trouble Cases (Sarat, A., Constable, M., Engel, D., Hans, V. and Lawrence, S., eds.). Evanston, Northwestern University Press, pp. 177–98.Google Scholar

Lind, E. A., Lissak, R. I. and Conlon, D. E. (1983). “Decision Control and Process Control Effects on Procedural Fairness Judgments”Journal of Applied Social Psychology 13: 338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lind, E. A., MacCoun, R., Ebener, P. A., Felstiner, W. L. F., Hensler, D. R., Resnik, J. and Tyler, T. (1989). The Perception of Justice: Tort Litigants' Views of Trial, Court-Annexed Arbitration, and Judicial Settlement Conferences. Santa Monica, Rand Institute for Civil Justice.Google Scholar

Lind, E. A., Maccoun, R. J., Ebener, P. A., Felstiner, W. L. F., Hensler, D. R., Resnik, J. and Tyler, T. R. (1990). “In the Eye Of The Beholder: Tort Litigants' Evaluations of Their Experiences in the Civil Justice System.” Law and Society Review 24: 953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lind, E. A., Kray, L. and Thompson, L. (1998). “The Social Construction of Injustice: Fairness Judgments in Response to Own and Others' Unfair Treatment by Authorities.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 75: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lind, E. A. and Tyler, T. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. London, Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Love, L. P. and Boskey, J. B. (1997). “Should Mediators Evaluate? A Debate between Lela P. Love and James B. Boskey.” Cardozo Online Journal of Conflict Resolution 1: 96.Google Scholar

Love, L. P. and Kovach, K. K. (2000). “ADR: An Eclectic Array of Processes, Rather Than One Eclectic Process.” Journal of Dispute Resolution 2000(2): 295.Google Scholar

Lowry, L. R. (2000). “Training Mediators for the 21st Century: To Evaluate or Not: That Is Not the Question!”Family and Conciliation Courts Review 38: 48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lowry, M. (1983). “Law School Socialization and the Perversion of Mediation in the United States.” Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 3: 245.Google Scholar

Macaulay, S. (1979). “Lawyers and Consumer Protection Laws.” Law and Society Review 14: 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Macfarlane, J. (November 1995). Court-Based Mediation of Civil Cases: An Evaluation of the Ontario Court (General Division) ADR Centre. Toronto, Queen's Printer for Ontario.Google Scholar

Macfarlane, J. (2001). “What Does the Changing Culture of Legal Practice Mean for Legal Education?”Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 20: 191.Google Scholar

Macfarlane, J. (2002). “Culture Change? A Tale of Two Cities and Mandatory Court-Connected Mediation.” Journal of Dispute Resolution 2002(2): 241.Google Scholar

Macfarlane, J. and Keet, M. (2004–5). “Civil Justice Reform and Mandatory Civil Mediation in Saskatchewan: Lessons from a Maturing Program.” Alberta Law Review 42: 677.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, C. (1987). Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge, MA, London, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Macleod, L. H., Fleischmann, E. H. and Demelo, A. (1998). “The Future of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Ontario: Mechanics of the Mandatory Mediation Programs.” Advocates' Quarterly 20: 389.Google Scholar

Maiman, R. J., Mather, L. and McEwen, C. A. (1992). “Gender and Specialization in the Practice of Divorce Law.” Maine Law Review 44: 39.Google Scholar

Manning, P. (1992). Erving Goffman and Modern Sociology. New York, Polity Press.Google Scholar

Margulies, P. (1990). “‘ Who Are You to Tell Me That?’: Attorney-Client Deliberation Regarding Nonlegal Issues and the Interests of Nonclients.” North Carolina Law Review 68: 213.Google Scholar

Maslow Cohen, J. (1990). “Feminism and Adaptive Heroinism: The Paradigm of Portia as a Means of Introduction.” Tulsa Law Journal 25: 657.Google Scholar

Mather, L. and Yngvesson, B. (1980–81). “Language, Audience, and the Transformation of Disputes.” Law and Society Review 15(3–4): 775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mather, L. M., McEwen, C. A. and Maiman, R. J. (2001). Divorce Lawyers at Work: Varieties of Professionalism in Practice. New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Maute, J. (1987). “Sporting Theory of Justice: Taming Adversarial Zeal with a Logical Sanctions Doctrine.” Connecticut Law Review 20: 7.Google Scholar

Maute, J. (2002). “Lady Lawyers: Not an Oxymoron.” Tulsa Law Review 38(Fall): 159.Google Scholar

McAdoo, B. (2002). “A Report to the Minnesota Supreme Court: The Impact of Rule 114 on Civil Litigation Practice in Minnesota.” Hamline Law Review 25: 401.Google Scholar

McAdoo, B. (2007). “All Rise, the Court Is in Session: What Judges Say about Court-Connected Mediation.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 22: 377.Google Scholar

McAdoo, B. and Hinshaw, A. (2002). “The Challenge of Institutionalizing Alternative Dispute Resolution: Attorney Perspectives on the Effect of Rule 17 on Civil Litigation in Missouri.” Missouri Law Review 67(Summer): 473.Google Scholar

McCabe, K. (2001). “A Forum for Women's Voices: Mediation through a Feminist Jurisprudential Lens.” Northern Illinois University Law Review 21: 459.Google Scholar

McDermott, E. P. and Obar, R. (2004). “‘What's Going on’ in Mediation: An Empirical Analysis of the Influence of a Mediator's Style on Party Satisfaction and Monetary Benefit.” Harvard Negotiation Law Review 9(Spring): 75.Google Scholar

McEwen, C. (1995). “Bring in the Lawyers: Challenging the Dominant Approaches to Ensuring Fairness in Divorce Mediation.” Minnesota Law Review 79: 1317.Google Scholar

McEwen, C., Mather, L. and Maiman, R. (1994). “Lawyers, Mediation, and the Management of Divorce Practice.” Law and Society Review 28: 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McEwen, C., Rogers, N. and Maiman, R. (1995). “Bring in the Lawyers: Challenging the Dominant Approaches to Ensuring Fairness in Divorce Mediation.” Minnesota Law Review 79: 1317.Google Scholar

McEwen, C. A. and Wissler, R. L. (2002). “Finding Out If It Is True: Comparing Mediation and Negotiation through Research.” Journal of Dispute Resolution 2002: 131.Google Scholar

McGillis, D. (1997). Community Mediation Programs: Developments and Challenges, National Institute of Justice. U.S. Department of Justice. www.ncjrs.org/txtfiles/165698.txt (last viewed February 25, 2005).

Menkel-Meadow, C. (1984). “Toward Another View of Legal Negotiation: The Structure of Problem Solving.” UCLA Law Review 31: 754.Google Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, C. (1985). “Portia in a Different Voice: Speculations on a Women's Lawyering Process.” Berkeley Women's Law Journal 1: 39.Google Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, C. (1987). “Excluded Voices: New Voices in the Legal Profession Making New Voices in the Law.” University of Miami Law Review 42: 29.Google Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, C. (1989). “Exploring a Research Agenda of the Feminization of the Legal Profession: Theories of Gender and Social Change.” Law and Social Inquiry 14: 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, C. (1991). “Pursuing Settlement in an Adversary Culture: A Tale of Innovation Co-Opted or the Law of ADR'.” Florida State University Law Review 19(Summer): 1.Google Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, C. (1994a). “Portia Redux: Another Look at Gender, Feminism, and Legal Ethics.” Virginia Journal of Social Policy and the Law 2(Fall): 75.Google Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, C. (1994b). “The Future of the Legal Profession: Culture Clash in the Quality of Life in the Law: Changes in the Economics, Diversification and Organization of Lawyering.” Case Western Reserve Law Review 44: 621.Google Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, C. (1995a). “Ethics and the Settlements of Mass Torts: When the Rules Meet the Road.” Cornell Law Review 80: 1159.Google Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, C. (1995b). “Whose Dispute Is It Anyway?: A Philosophical and Democratic Defense of Settlement (in Some Cases).” Georgetown Law Journal 83: 2663.Google Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, C. (1995c). “Book Review: The Many Ways of Mediation: The Transformation of Traditions, Ideologies, Paradigms, and Practices.” Negotiation Journal 11(3, July): 217–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, C. (1996a). “Is Mediation the Practice of Law?”Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation 14(5): 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, C. (1996b). “The Trouble with the Adversary System in a Postmodern, Multicultural World.” William & Mary Law Review 38(October): 5.Google Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, C. (1997a). “Ethics in Alternative Dispute Resolution: New Issues. No Answers from the Adversary Conception of Lawyers' Responsibilities.” South Texas Law Review 38: 407.Google Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, C. (1997b). “What Trina Taught Me: Reflections on Mediation, Inequality, Teaching and Life.” Minnesota Law Review 81(June): 1413.Google Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, C. (1999). “New Roles: Problem Solving the Lawyer as Problem Solver and Third-Party Neutral: Creativity and Non-Partisanship in Lawyering.” Temple Law Review 72(Winter): 785.Google Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, C. (2000a). “Teaching about Gender and Negotiation: Sex, Truths and Videotape.” Negotiation Journal 16: 357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, C. (2000b). “Mothers and Fathers of Invention: The Intellectual Founders of ADR.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 16: 1.Google Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, C. (2001). “Negotiating with Lawyers, Men and Things: The Contextual Approach Still Matters.” Negotiation Journal 17(3): 257–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, C. (2002a). “Ethics Issues in Arbitration and Related Dispute Resolution Processes: What's Happening and What's Not.” University of Miami Law Review 56: 949.Google Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, C. (2002b). “The Lawyer as Consensus Builder: Ethics for a New Practice.” Tennessee Law Review 70(Fall): 63–119.Google Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, C. (2004). “From Legal Disputes to Conflict Resolution and Human Problem Solving: Legal Dispute Resolution in a Multidisciplinary Context.” Journal of Legal Education 54(March): 7.Google Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, C. (November 17, 2006). Comments on manuscript by Carrie Menkel-Meadow to author. On file with author.

Menkel-Meadow, C., Love, L. P. and Schneider, A. K. (2006). Mediation: Practice, Policy and Ethics. New York, Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar

Merriam, S. and Caffarella, R. (1991). Learning in Adulthood: A Comprehensive Guide. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Merry, S. (1990a). “The Discourses of Mediation and the Power of Naming.” Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 2: 1.Google Scholar

Merry, S. (1990b). Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working-Class Americans. Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Merry, S. (1992). “Culture, Power, and the Discourse of Law.” The New York Law School Law Review 37: 209.Google Scholar

Merry, S. and Milner, N. (eds.) (1993). The Possibility of Popular Justice: A Case Study of Community Mediation in the United States. Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan Press.

Merry, S. and Silbey, S. (1984). “What Do Plaintiffs Want? Reexamining the Concept of Dispute.” The Justice System Journal 9(2): 151.Google Scholar

Meschievitz, C. (1990). Mediating Medical Malpractice Claims in Wisconsin: A Preliminary Report. Madison, University of Wisconsin – Madison Law School.Google Scholar

Meschievitz, C. (1991). “Mediation and Medical Malpractice: Problems with Definition and Implementation.” Law and Contemporary Problems 54(1): 195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Meschievitz, C. S. (1994). “Efficacious or Precarious? Comments on the Processing and Resolution of Medical Malpractice Claims in the United States.” Annals of Health Law 3: 123.Google ScholarPubMed

Metzloff, T., Peeples, R. and Harris, C. (1997). “Empirical Perspectives on Mediation and Malpractice.” Law and Contemporary Problems 60(1): 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Ministry-of-the-Attorney-General (1999). Code of Conduct: Ontario Mandatory Mediation Program. Ministry of the Attorney General. http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/courts/manmed/codeofconduct.asp (last viewed August 8, 2008).

Mnookin, R., Peppet, S. and Tulumello, A. (2000). Beyond Winning: Negotiating to Create Value in Deals and Disputes. Cambridge, MA, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Mnookin, R. H. and Kornhauser, L. (1979). “Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce.” Yale Law Journal 88: 950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, C. W. (2003). The Mediation Process: Practical Strategies for Resolving Conflict. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Morris, C. (1999). “The Moulding of Lawyers: ADR and Legal Education.” Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 17: 271.Google Scholar

Morton, L. and Einesman, F. (2001). “The Effects of Mediation in a Juvenile Incarceration Facility: Reduction of Violence Through Transformation.” Cleveland State Law Review 49: 255.Google Scholar

Mouzelis, N. (1991). Back to Sociological Theory: The Construction of Social Orders. London, Macmillan Press Ltd.Google Scholar

Mulcahy, L. (1999). Mediating Medical Negligence Claims – An Option for the Future. Socio-Legal Studies Association Annual Conference, Loughborough, England.Google Scholar

Mulcahy, L., Selwood, M., Summerfield, L. and Netten, A. (2000). Mediating Medical Negligence Claims: An Option for the Future?London, Stationery Office.Google Scholar

Nader, L. (1993). “Controlling Processes in the Practice of Law: Hierarchy and Pacification in the Movement to Re-Form Dispute Ideology.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 9: 1.Google Scholar

Nader, L. (2002). The Life of the Law. Berkeley, CA, University of California Press.Google Scholar

,NCC (1995). Seeking Civil Justice: A Survey of People's Needs and Experiences. London, HMSO.Google Scholar

Nelken, M. (1996). “Negotiation and Psychoanalysis: If I'd Wanted to Learn about Feelings, I Wouldn't Have Gone to Law School.” Journal of Legal Education 46: 420.Google Scholar

Neumann, R. (2000). “Women in Legal Education: What the Statistics Show.” Journal of Legal Education 50: 313.Google Scholar

Nisselle, P. (1999). “Editorial: Angered Patients and the Medical Profession.” Medical Journal of Australia 170: 576.Google ScholarPubMed

Nolan-Haley, J. (1996). “Court Mediation and the Search for Justice through Law.” Washington University Law Quarterly 74(January): 47.Google Scholar

Nolan-Haley, J. (1998). “Lawyers, Clients, and Mediation.” Notre Dame Law Review 73: 1369.Google Scholar

Nolan-Haley, J. (2002). “Lawyers, Non-Lawyers and Mediation: Rethinking the Professional Monopoly from a Problem-Solving Perspective.” Harvard Negotiation Law Review 7(Spring): 235.Google Scholar

Noonan, J. (1993). “Persons and Masks of the Law (1976),” in The Responsible Judge: Readings in Judicial Ethics. Westport, CT, Praeger, pp. 22–34.Google Scholar

O'Barr, W. M. and Conley, J. M. (1990). “Litigant Satisfaction versus Legal Adequacy in Small Claims Court Narratives,” in Language in the Judicial Process (Levi, D. N. and Walker, A. G., eds.), Vol. 97. New York, Plenum.Google Scholar

O'Hara, E. A. and Yarn, D. (2002). “On Apology and Consilience.” Washington Law Review 77: 1121.Google Scholar

,Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General (1999). Ontario Mandatory Mediation Program: Fact Sheet on the Mandatory Mediation Program. Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General. http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/courts/manmed/factsheet.asp (last viewed August 8, 2008)

Palmer, M. (1987). “The Revival of Mediation in the People's Republic of China: (1) Extra-Judicial Mediation,” in Yearbook on Socialist Legal Systems (Butler, W. E., ed.). Dobbs Ferry, New York, Transnational Publishers, pp. 219–77.Google Scholar

Palmer, M. (1989). “The Revival of Mediation in the People's Republic of China: (2) Extra-Judicial Mediation,” in Yearbook on Socialist Legal Systems (Butler, W. E., ed.). Dobbs Ferry, New York, Transnational Publishers, pp. 145–71.Google Scholar

Palmer, M. and Roberts, S. (1998). Dispute Processes: ADR and the Primary Forms of Decision Making. London, Butterworths.Google Scholar

Patterson, D. (1992). “Postmodernism/Feminism/Law.” Cornell Law Review 77: 254.Google Scholar

Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park, London, Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Pavlick, D. L. (2003). “Apology and Mediation: The Horse and Carriage of the Twenty-First Century.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 18: 829.Google Scholar

Payne, K. (2001). Different but Equal: Communication between the Sexes. Westport, CT, Praeger.Google Scholar

Pearson, J. and Thoennes, N. (1988). “Divorce Mediation Research Results,” in Divorce Mediation: Theory and Practice (Folberg, J. and Milne, A., eds.). New York, Guildford Press, p. 429.Google Scholar

Pennebaker, J. (ed.) (1995). “Emotion, Disclosure and Health: An Overview” in Emotion, Disclosure and Health. Washington, DC, American Psychological Association, pp. 3–10.CrossRef

Pepper, R. A. (1998). “Mandatory Mediation: Ontario's Unfortunate Experience in Court-Annexed ADR.” Advocates Quarterly 20(4): 403.Google Scholar

Pepper, S. (1995). “Counseling at the Limits of the Law: An Exercise in the Jurisprudence and Ethics of Lawyering.” Yale Law Journal 104: 1545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phillips, R. A. (1992). “Mediation of Medical Malpractice Disputes.” North Carolina Medical Journal 53(11): 582.Google Scholar

Polywka, S. (1997). “Mediation of Clinical Negligence Claims: A Pilot Scheme Endorsed by the NHS Executive in the Anglia and Oxford Region.” Clinical Risk 3(3): 80.Google Scholar

Price, K. H., Hall, T. W., Bos, K. V. D., Hunton, J. E., Lovett, S. and Tippett, M. J. (2001). “Features of the Value Function for Voice and Their Consistency across Participants from Four Countries: Great Britain, Mexico, the Netherlands, and the United States.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 84: 95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rabinow, P. (ed.) (1986). The Foucault Reader/Michel Foucault. Harmondsworth, Penguin Books.

Rack, C. (1999). “Negotiated Justice: Gender & Ethnic Minority Bargaining Patterns in the Metro Court Study.” Hamline Journal of Public Law and Policy 20: 211.Google Scholar

Raz, J. (2004). Legal Philosophy Seminar Series. New York, Columbia University.Google Scholar

Reeves, J. W. (1994). “ADR Relieves Pain of Health Care Disputes.” Dispute Resolution Journal 49(3): 14.Google Scholar

Reich, J. B. (2001). “A Call for Intellectual Honesty: A Response to the Uniform Mediation Act's Privilege against Disclosure.” Journal of Dispute Resolution 2001: 197.Google Scholar

Reich, J. B. (2002). “Attorney V. Client: Creating a Mechanism to Address Competing Process Interests in Lawyer-Driven Mediation.” Southern Illinois University Law Journal 26(Winter): 183.Google Scholar

Relis, T. (2002). “Civil Litigation from Litigants' Perspectives: What We Know and What We Don't Know about the Litigation Experience of Individual Litigants,” in Studies in Law, Politics, and Society (Sarat, A. and Ewick, P., eds.), Vol. 25. London, New York, Oxford, Elsevier Science, p. 151.Google Scholar

Relis, T. (2004). “Lawyers and Clients: Disparate Conceptions of Dispute Resolution in Litigation-Linked Mediation,” in Sociology of Law. Japan, Japan Association of the Sociology of Law (JASL), University of Tokyo, pp. 24–41.Google Scholar

Relis, T. (2007a). ‘It's Not about the Money!’: A Theory on Misconceptions of Plaintiffs' Litigation Aims.” University of Pittsburgh Law Review 68(2): 701–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Relis, T. (2007b). “Consequences of Power.” Harvard Negotiation Law Review 12: 445–501.Google Scholar

Rhode, D. (1994). “Gender and Professional Roles.” Fordham Law Review 63: 39.Google Scholar

Ricci, I. (1985). “Mediator's Notebook: Reflections on Promoting Equal Empowerment and Entitlement for Women,” in Divorce Mediation: Perspectives on the Field (Everett, C., ed.). New York, Haworth Press, pp. 49–62.Google Scholar

Rifkin, J. (1984). “Mediation from a Feminist Perspective: Promises and Problems.” Law and Inequality 2: 21.Google Scholar

Riley, H. and McGinn, K. L. (2002). When Does Gender Matter in Negotiation? KSG Faculty Research Working Paper Series. Cambridge, MA, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.Google Scholar

Riskin, L. (1982). “Mediation and Lawyers.” Ohio State Law Journal 43: 29.Google Scholar

Riskin, L. (1996). “Understanding Mediators' Orientations, Strategies and Techniques: A Grid for the Perplexed.” Harvard Negotiation Law Review 1: 7.Google Scholar

Riskin, L. (2002). “The Contemplative Lawyer: On the Potential Contributions of Mindfulness Meditation to Law Students, Lawyers, and Their Clients.” Harvard Negotiation Law Review 7(Spring): 1.Google Scholar

Riskin, L. (2003). “Decisionmaking in Mediation: The New Old Grid and the New Grid System.” Notre Dame Law Review 79: 1.Google Scholar

Riskin, L. and Westbrook, J. (1997). Dispute Resolution and Lawyers. St. Paul, MN, West Publishing.Google Scholar

Riskin, L. L. (1985). “The Special Place of Mediation in Alternative Dispute Processing.” Florida Law Review 37: 19.Google Scholar

Robbennolt, J. (2003). “Apologies and Legal Settlement: An Empirical Examination.” Michigan Law Review 102: 460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, M. (1997). Mediation in Family Disputes: Principles of Practice. Aldershot, Arena Ashgate.Google Scholar

Roberts, S. (1993). “ADR and Civil Justice: An Unresolved Relationship.” Modern Law Review 56: 450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, S. (2000). “Settlement as Civil Justice.” Modern Law Review 63(5): 739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, S. (2002). “Institutionalized Settlement in England: A Contemporary Panorama.” Willamette Journal of International Law and Dispute Resolution 10: 17.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, J. (1991). “In Defense of Mediation.” Arizona Law Review 33: 467.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, J. D. (2004). “Interpersonal Dynamics: Helping Lawyers Learn the Skills, and the Importance, of Human Relationships in the Practice of Law.” University of Miami Law Review 58: 1225.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, D. (1974). Lawyer and Client: Who's In Charge?New York, Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Rubinson, R. (2004). “Client Counseling, Mediation, and Alternative Narratives of Dispute Resolution.” Clinical Law Review 10(Spring): 833.Google Scholar

Sally, D. (2003). “Yearn for Paradise, Live in Limbo: Optimal Frustration for ADR.” Penn State Law Review 108(Summer): 89.Google Scholar

Sander, F. and Mnookin, R. (2000). “A Worthy Challenge: The Teaching of Problem Solving in Law Schools.” American Bar Association Dispute Resolution Magazine (Summer): 21.Google Scholar

Sander, F. E. A. (1976). Varieties of Dispute Processing. National Conference on the Causes of Popular Dissatisfaction with the Administration of Justice, F. R. D.

Santos, B. D. S. (1977). “The Law of the Oppressed: The Construction and Reproduction of Legality in Pasargada.” Law and Society Review 12(1): 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sarat, A. (1976). “Alternatives in Dispute Processing: Litigation in a Small Claims Court.” Law and Society Review 10: 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sarat, A. and Felstiner, W. (1986). “Law and Strategy in the Divorce Lawyer's Office.” Law and Society Review 20: 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sarat, A. and Felstiner, W. (1988). “Law and Social Relations: Vocabularies of Motive in Lawyer/Client Interaction.” Law and Society Review 22(4): 737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sarat, A. and Felstiner, W. (1989). “Lawyers and Legal Consciousness: Law Talk in the Divorce Lawyer's Office.” Yale Law Journal 98: 1663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sarat, A. and Felstiner, W. (1990). “Legal Realism in Lawyer–Client Communication,” in Language in the Judicial Process (Levi, J. and Walker, A., eds.). London, Plenum Press, pp. 133–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sarat, A. and Felstiner, W. (1995a). Divorce Lawyers and Their Clients. New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sarat, A. and Felstiner, W. (1995b). “Law and Social Relations: Vocabularies of Motive in Lawyer/Client Interaction,” in The Law & Society Reader (Abel, R., ed.). New York, New York University Press, pp. 403–30.Google Scholar

Saravia, A. (1999). “Notes and Comments: Overview of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Healthcare Disputes.” Journal of Health and Hospital Law 32(1): 139.Google Scholar

Schutz, A. (1967). The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston, Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Schutz, A. (1982). “The Problem of Social Reality,” in Collected Papers I. The Problem of Social Reality (Natanson, M. A. and Breda, H. L., eds.). The Hague, Boston, Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Scott, L. W. (2006). “The Law of Mediation in Texas.” St. Mary's Law Journal 37: 325.Google Scholar

Shack, J. E. (2003). Bibliographic Summary of Cost, Pace, and Satisfaction Studies of Court-Related Mediation Programs. Chicago, IL, Center for Conflict, Center for Analysis of Alternative Dispute Resolution Systems (CAADRS) Publication.Google Scholar

Shalleck, A. (1992). “The Feminist Transformation of Lawyering: A Response to Naomi Cahn.” Hastings Law Journal 43: 1071.Google Scholar

Shalleck, A. (1993). “Constructions of the Client within Legal Education.” Stanford Law Review 45(6, July): 1731–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapiro, M. (1981). Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. Chicago, London, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Sherwin, R. (1992a). “Lawyering Theory: An Overview What We Talk about When We Talk about Law.” The New York Law School Law Review 37: 9.Google Scholar

Sherwin, R. (1992b). “Preface: Comment.” The New York Law School Law Review 37: 1.Google Scholar

Shestowsky, D. (2004). “Procedural Preferences in Alternative Dispute Resolution: A Closer, Modern Look at an Old Idea.” Psychology, Public Policy and Law 10(September): 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shuman, D. (2000). “Role of Apology in Tort Law.” Judicature 83(4): 180.Google Scholar

Silbey, S. (2002). “The Emperor's New Clothes: Mediation Mythology and Markets.” Journal of Dispute Resolution 2002: 171.Google Scholar

Silbey, S. and Merry, S. (1986). “Mediator Settlement Strategies.” Law and Policy 8: 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silbey, S. and Sarat, A. (1989). “Dispute Processing in Law and Legal Scholarship.” Denver University Law Review 66: 437.Google Scholar

Silver, M. (1999). “Emotional Intelligence and Legal Education.” Psychology Public Policy and Law 5: 1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simanowitz, A. (1998). “Mediation in Medical Negligence.” Clinical Risk 4(2): 63.Google Scholar

Stamato, L. (1992). “Voice, Place, and Process: Research on Gender, Negotiation, and Conflict Resolution”Mediation Quarterly 9: 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stempel, J. (1997). “Beyond Formalism and False Dichotomies: The Need for Institutionalizing a Flexible Concept of the Mediator's Role.” Florida State University Law Review 24: 949.Google Scholar

Stempel, J. (2000a). “Identifying Real Dichotomies Underlying the False Dichotomy: Twenty-First Century Mediation in an Eclectic Regime.” Journal of Dispute Resolution 2000: 371.Google Scholar

Stempel, J. W. (2000b). “The Inevitability of the Eclectic: Liberating ADR from Ideology.” Journal of Dispute Resolution 2000: 247.Google Scholar

Stempel, J. W. (2002–3). “Forgetfulness, Fuzziness, Functionality, Fairness, and Freedom in Dispute Resolution: Serving Dispute Resolution through Adjudication.” Nevada Law Journal 3(Winter): 305.Google Scholar

Sternlight, J. (1999). “Lawyers' Representation of Clients in Mediation: Using Economics and Psychology to Structure Advocacy in a Nonadversarial Setting.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 14: 269.Google Scholar

Sternlight, J. (2003). “ADR Is Here: Preliminary Reflections on Where It Fits in a System of Justice.” Nevada Law Journal 3: 289.Google Scholar

Stitt, A., Feld, L. and Houston, H. (1999). The ADR Spectrum. Stitt Feld Handy Houston. www.adr.ca/news/adrspect.asp (last viewed August 17, 1999).Google Scholar

Stolle, D., Wexler, D. and Winick, B. (1997). “Integrating Preventive Law and Therapeutic Jurisprudence: A Law and Psychology Based Approach to Lawyering.” California Western Law Review 34: 15.Google Scholar

Strang, H. and Sherman, L. W. (2003). “Repairing the Harm: Victims and Restorative Justice.” Utah Law Review 2003(1): 15.Google Scholar

Strong, G. (1998). “The Lawyer's Left Hand: Nonanalytical Thought in the Practice of Law.” University of Colorado Law Review 69: 759.Google Scholar

Stuhlmacher, A. F. and Walters, A. E. (1999). “Gender Differences in Negotiation Outcome A Meta-Analysis.” Personnel Psychology 52: 653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stulberg, J. (1997). “Facilitative versus Evaluative Mediator Orientations: Piercing the ‘Grid’ Lock.” Florida State University Law Review 24: 985.Google Scholar

Subrin, S. (2003). “A Traditionalist Looks at Mediation: It's Here to Stay and Much Better Than I Thought.” Nevada Law Journal 3: 196.Google Scholar

Taber, J., Grant, M., Huser, M., Rise, N., Sutton, J. and Wong, C. (1988). “Project, Gender, Legal Education, and the Legal Profession: An Empirical Study of Stanford Law Students and Graduates.” Stanford Law Review 40: 1209.Google Scholar

Tamanaha, B. (1993). Understanding Law in Micronesia: An Interpretive Approach to Transplanted Law. New York, E. J. Brill.Google Scholar

Tanick, M. H. and Ayling, T. J. (1996). “Alternative Dispute Resolution by Apology: Settlement by Saying ‘I'm Sorry’.” Hennepin Law 22(July–August): 112.Google Scholar

Tannen, D. (1990). You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York, Ballantine Books.Google Scholar

Tannen, D. (1994). Talking from 9 to 5. New York, William Morrow.Google Scholar

Teff, H. (1994). Reasonable Care: Legal Perspectives on the Doctor-Patient Relationship. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Thibaut, J. and Walker, L. (1975). Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Thibaut, J. and Walker, L. (1978). “A Theory of Procedure.” California Law Review 86: 386.Google Scholar

Thoennes, N., Pearson, J. and , J. Bell (1991). Evaluation of the Use of Mandatory Divorce Mediation. Denver, Center for Policy Research.Google Scholar

Thornton, M. (1989). “Equivocations of Conciliation: The Resolution of Discrimination Complaints in Australia.” Modern Law Review 52(6): 733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, V. (1974). Dramas, Fields and Metaphors: Symbolic Action in Human Society. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Twining, W. (1993). “Alternative to What? Theories of Litigation, Procedure and Dispute Settlement in Anglo-American Jurisprudence: Some Neglected Classics.” Modern Law Review 56(3): 380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tyler, T. (1987). “The Psychology of Disputant Concerns in Mediation.” Negotiation Journal 3(4): 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tyler, T. (1988). “What Is Procedural Justice?: Criteria Used by Citizens to Assess the Fairness of Legal Procedures.” Law and Society Review 22(1): 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tyler, T. (1997). “Citizen Discontent with Legal Procedures: A Social Science Perspective on Civil Procedure Reform.” American Journal of Comparative Law 45(Fall): 871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tyler, , , T. R., Casper, J. D. and Fisher, B. (1989). “Maintaining Allegiance toward Political Authorities: The Role of Prior Attitudes and the Use of Fair Procedures.” American Journal of Political Science 33: 629–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tyler, T. R., Rasinski, K. A. and Spodick, N. (1985). “Influence of Voice on Satisfaction With Leaders: Exploring the Meaning of Process Control.” American Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48(1): 72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ury, W. (1988). Getting Disputes Resolved: Designing Systems to Cut the Cost of Conflict. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Vallance, R. (1990). “Preliminary Legal Steps for the Patient,” in Medical Negligence (Powers, M. and Harris, N., eds.). London and Edinburgh, Butterworths, pp. 101–30.Google Scholar

Vidmar, N. (1984). “The Small Claims Court: A Reconceptualization of Disputes and an Empirical Investigation.” Law and Society Review 18(4): 515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vincent, C., Young, M. and Phillips, A. (1994). “Why Do People Sue Doctors? A Study of Patients and Relatives Taking Legal Action.” The Lancet 343(8913): 1609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vogelstein, R. (2003). “Confidentiality vs. Care: Re-Evaluating the Duty to Self, Client, and Others.” Georgetown Law Journal 92: 153.Google Scholar

Waldman, E. (1998). “The Evaluative-Facilitative Debate in Mediation: Applying the Lens of Therapeutic Jurisprudence.” Marquette Law Review 82: 155.Google Scholar

Walters, A. E., Stuhlmacher, A. F. and Meyer, L. L. (1998). “Gender and Negotiator Competitiveness: A Meta-Analysis.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 76: 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Watson, C. (1994a). “Gender Differences in Negotiating Behavior and Outcomes: Fact or Artifact,” in Conflict and Gender (Taylor, A. and Miller, J. B., eds.). Cresskill, NJ, Hampton Press, pp. 191–201.Google Scholar

Watson, C. (1994b). “In Theory: Gender Versus Power as a Predictor of Negotiation Behaviors and Outcomes.” Negotiation Journal 10: 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weber, M. (1922). Wirtschaft Und Gesellschaft (English translation by Henderson, A. and Parsons, T., 1957). Tübingen, J.C.B. Mohr (P. Siebeck).Google Scholar

Weckstein, D. (1997). “In Praise of Party Empowerment-and of Mediator Activism.” Willamette Law Review 33: 501.Google Scholar

Welsh, N. (2001a). “Making Deals in Court-Connected Mediation: What's Justice Got to Do with It?”Washington University Law Quarterly 79(Fall): 787.Google Scholar

Welsh, N. (2001b). “The Thinning Vision of Self-Determination in Court-Connected Mediation: The Inevitable Price of Institutionalization?”Harvard Negotiation Law Review 6(Spring): 1.Google Scholar

Welsh, N. (2004a). “Stepping Back through the Looking Glass: Real Conversations with Real Disputants about Institutionalized Mediation and Its Value.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 38: 573.Google Scholar

Welsh, N. A. (2004b). “The Place of Court-Connected Mediation in a Democratic Justice System.” Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 5(Spring): 117.Google Scholar

White, J. (1990). Justice as Translation: An Essay in Cultural and Legal Criticism. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Williams, J. (1989). “Deconstructing Gender.” Michigan Law Review 87(February): 797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, W. (1982). “The Equality Crisis: Some Reflections on Culture, Courts, and Feminism.” Women's Rights Law Report 7: 175.Google Scholar

Winick, B. (1997). “The Jurisprudence of Therapeutic Jurisprudence.” Psychology, Public Policy and Law 3: 184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wise, R. K. (2006). “Mediation in Texas: Can the Judge Really Make Me Do That?”South Texas Law Review 47: 849.Google Scholar

Wissler, R. (1997). “The Effects of Mandatory Mediation: Empirical Research on the Experience of Small Claims and Common Pleas Courts.” Willamette Law Review 33: 565.Google Scholar

Wissler, R. (1998). “Study Finds Mediators' Style Can Have an Impact on Outcome of Dispute Resolution.” Dispute Resolution Magazine 4(4): 28.Google Scholar

Wissler, R. (2000). “‘Attorneys’ Use of ADR Is Crucial to Their Willingness to Recommend It to Their Clients.” Dispute Resolution Magazine 2000(Spring): 36.Google Scholar

Wissler, R. (2002). “Court-Connected Mediation in General Civil Cases: What We Know from Empirical Research.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 17: 641.Google Scholar

Wissler, R. L. (2001). “To Evaluate or Facilitate?”Dispute Resolution Magazine 2001(Winter): 35.Google Scholar