Dixon, B., ed. From creation to chaos: classic writings in science. Oxford, Blackwell, 1989.

Anonymous. Superstring theory. Lancet 1989; ii: 426–7.Google Scholar

Feynman, R. P.. ‘Surely you’re joking, Mr Feynman!’London, Unwin, 1986.Google Scholar

Shuster, S.. Loneliness of a long distanced reviewer. BMJ 1981; 283: 1443–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gregory, M. W.. The infectiousness of pompous prose. Nature 1992; 360: 11–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

O’Donnell, M.. One man’s burden. BMJ 1985; 290: 250.Google Scholar

Dutton, D. B.. Worse than the disease: pitfalls of medical progress. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furedi, F.. Where have all the intellectuals gone?London, Continuum, 2004; p. 95.Google Scholar

Anonymous. Trimming hedges. Lancet 1992; 340: 275–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tinker, J. H.. Book review. N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayes, D. P.. The growing inaccessibility of science. Nature 1992; 356: 739–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pickering, G.. High blood pressure, 2nd ed. London, Churchill, 1968.Google Scholar

Flowerdew, J.. Some thoughts on English for research publication purposes (ERPP) and related issues. Lang Teach 2013; 1–13. CJO doi: Google Scholar

Kaplan, R. B.. Cultural thought patterns in inter-cultural education. Lang Learn 1966; 16: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clyne, M.. Cultural differences in the organization of academic texts: English and German. J Pragmat 1987; 11: 211–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Englander, K.. But it would be good in Spanish: an analysis of awkward scholarly writing in English by L2 writers. In Santos, S., ed. EFL writing in Mexican universities: research and experience. Nayarit, Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit, 2010, pp. 55–71.Google Scholar

Netzel, R., Perez-Iratxeta, C., Bork, P. and Andrade, M. A.. The way we write. EMBO Rep 2003; 4: 446–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fraser, J. G. and Martin, V. J.. Marketing data: has the rise of impact factor led to the fall of objective language in the scientific article?Respir Res 2009, 10: 35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Watson, J. D. and Crick, F. H. C.. A structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature 1953; 171: 737–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Durant, J.. Silver tongues and twitching eyebrows. The Times Higher Educational Supplement 25 Mar 1994, pp. 21–2.Google Scholar

Silverman, W. A.. Human experimentation: a guided step into the unknown. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Whimster, W. F.. Reading, writing – and rewriting. BMJ 1987; 294: 1011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

MacUser 9 July 1993, p. 55.

Crystal, D.. Spell it out: the singular story of English spelling. London, Profile, 2012.Google Scholar

Anonymous. Personal view: a hidden handicap. BMJ 1994; 308: 66–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloom, D. A., Mory, R. N. and Hinman, Jr. F.Dilation vs. dilatation. J Urol 1992; 147: 1682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Aronson, J. K.. “Where name and image meet” – the argument for adrenaline. BMJ 2000; 320: 506–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Crick, F.. What mad pursuit: a personal view of scientific discovery. London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1988, p. 109.Google Scholar

Henderson, C., et al., for the Whole System Demonstrator evaluation team. Cost effectiveness of telehealth for patients with long term conditions (Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study): nested economic evaluation in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2013; 346: f1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, J. R. A.. Back to the future: so what will fibrinolytic therapy offer your patients with myocardial infarction?BMJ 1986; 292: 973–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Paton, A.. Way with words. BMJ 1994; 309: 253.Google Scholar

Brewin, T. B.. Empirical: one word, two meanings. J R Coll Physicians Lond 1994; 28: 78–9.Google ScholarPubMed

Burkhart, S.. Sexism in medical writing. BMJ 1987; 295: 1585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kuhn, T.. The structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd ed. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Anonymous. Pause at the parameter. BMJ 1966; 1: 1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sinclair, D. M.. Correspondence: parameters. BMJ 1965; 2:174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodman, N. W.. Paradigm, parameter, paralysis of mind. BMJ 1993; 307: 1627–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Up & down the city road. The Independent Magazine, 5 Feb 1994, p. 10, col 3.

Nash, W.. English usage. A guide to first principles. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1986, p. 53.Google Scholar

Yu, B., Mei, Q. and Zhai, C.. English usage comparison between native and non-native English speakers in academic writing.

Berkanovic, E., Reeder, L. G., Marcus, A. C. and Schwartz, S.. The effects of prepayment on access to medical care: the PACC experience. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc 1975; 53: 241–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Eger, E. I., II. A template for writing a scientific paper. Anesth Analg 1989; 68: 740–3.Google Scholar

Ziman, J.. Reliable knowledge. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1978, p. 42.Google Scholar

Pinker, S.. The language instinct. London, Allen Lane, The Penguin Press, 1994, pp. 213–14.Google Scholar

Cooter, M.. Putting on the style. BMJ 1999: 319: 1592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ohtake, H. and Morren, B.. The use and misuse of English prepositions in Japanese medical research writing. J Med Eng Educ 2011; 10: 65–76.Google Scholar

Howard, P.. Winged words. London, Corgi, 1983.Google Scholar

Goodman, N. W.. Survey of active verbs in the titles of clinical trial reports. BMJ 2000; 320: 914–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rosner, J.. Reflections on science as a product. Nature 1990; 345: 108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goodman, N. W.. Novel tools constitutes a paradigm: how title words in medical journal articles have changed since 1970. The Write Stuff 2010; 19: 269–71.Google Scholar

Goodman, N. W.. Familiarity breeds: clichés in article titles. Br J Gen Pract 2012; 62: 656–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goodman, N. W.. From Shakespeare to Star Trek and beyond: a Medline search for literary and other allusions in biomedical titles. BMJ 2005; 331: 1540–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cameron, S. M.. Cinderella revisited. BMJ 2005; 331: 1543–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gjersvik, G. P.. Dette er en god tittel. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2013; 133: 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, B.. Slide rules. BMJ 1994; 309: 1665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stevenson, A. and Waite, M., eds. Concise Oxford English Dictionary, 12th ed. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011.

Oxford English Dictionary. CD-ROM. v. 4.0. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2010.

Baron, D. N., ed. Units, symbols and abbreviations. A guide for biological and medical editors and authors, 6th ed. London, Royal Society of Medicine Services, 2008.

Gowers, E.. The complete plain words, 3rd ed, revised by Greenbaum, S., Whitcut, J.London, Penguin, 1987.Google Scholar

The Economist style guide, 10th ed. London, Profile Books, 2013.

Bryson, B.. Troublesome words, 3rd ed. London, Penguin, 2009.Google Scholar

Hicks, W.. Quite literally. Problem words and how to use them. New York, Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar

Trask, R. L.. Mind the gaffe. The Penguin guide to common errors in English. London, Penguin, 2002.Google Scholar

Trask, R. L.. The Penguin guide to punctuation. London, Penguin, 2004.Google Scholar

Albert, T.. Write effectively: a quick course for busy health workers. Oxford, Radcliffe Publishing, 2008. The author of this book – inventor of the ‘pub test’ (p. 201) and writer of the Foreword (p. ix) – devised courses for health professionals, running over 1000 before he retired. His website () is worth a visit.Google Scholar

Barrass, R.. Scientists must write, 2nd ed. London, Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar

Huth, E.. Writing and publishing in medicine, 3rd ed. Baltimore, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1998.Google Scholar

O’Connor, M.. Writing successfully in science. London, Routledge, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwager, E.. Medical usage and abusage. Phoenix, Oryx Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Carr, S.. Tackling NHS jargon. Getting the message across. Oxford, Radcliffe Medical Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Allen, R.. Pocket Fowler’s modern English usage, 2nd ed. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Hayakawa, S. I. and Ehrlich, E.. The Penguin guide to synonyms and related words, 2nd ed. London, Penguin, 1996.Google Scholar

Bigwood, S. and Spore, M.. Presenting numbers, tables, and charts. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Tufte, E. R.. The visual display of quantitative information. Surrey, Graphics Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Bryson, B.. Mother tongue. The story of the English language. London, Penguin, 1991 (reissued 2009). The story of the language, told with humour.Google Scholar

Crystal, D.. The English language. A guided tour of the language, 2nd ed. London, Penguin, 2002. More scholarly than Bryson.Google Scholar

Crystal, D.. The Cambridge encyclopedia of the English language, 2nd ed. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003. What it says: encyclopaedic. A coffee table book about the language: read about Singapore English, the great vowel shift, and more.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R.. The Oxford Book of Modern Science Writing. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008. About 100 examples, with commentary, of good scientific writing.Google Scholar

Feynman, R. P.. ‘Surely you’re joking, Mr Feynman!’London, Unwin, 1986. (See & .)Google Scholar

Medawar, P., Memoir of a thinking radish. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

O’Donnell, M.. A sceptic’s medical dictionary. London, BMJ Publishing Group, 1997. The inventor of the term Decorated Municipal Gothic. (See & .)Google Scholar

Perutz, M.. Is science necessary? Essays on science and scientists. London, Barrie and Jenkins, 1989.Google Scholar

Truss, L.. Eats, shoots & leaves. The zero tolerance approach to punctuation. London, Profile Books, 2003. This book won Britain’s best book of the year award in 2004, and has sold three million copies worldwide.Google Scholar