Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-l48q4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-02-23T18:33:24.867Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part 3 - Qualitative Approaches to Measuring Corporate Compliance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2022

Melissa Rorie
Affiliation:
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Benjamin van Rooij
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam, School of Law
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Measuring Compliance
Assessing Corporate Crime and Misconduct Prevention
, pp. 187 - 238
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Suggested Resources

Brinkmann, Svend and Kvale, Steinar. 2015. InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing, 3rd ed., Washington, DC: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Rubin, Herbert J. and Rubin, Irene S.. 2012. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data, 3rd ed., Washington, DC: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Sim, Julius and Waterfield, Jackie. 2019. Focus group methodology: Some ethical challenges. Quality & Quantity, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11135-019–00914–5.Google Scholar

References

Berry, Jeffrey M. 2002. Validity and reliability issues in elite interviewing. PS: Political Science & Politics, 35(4), 679–82.Google Scholar
Denzin, Norman K. and Lincoln, Yvonna S., eds. 2011. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 4th ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Dubois, Vincent. 2019. Welfare fraud inspectors between standardization and discretion. In van de Walle, Steven and Raaphorst, Nadine, eds., Inspectors and Enforcement at the Front Line of Government. New York: Palgrave, pp. 167–86.Google Scholar
Fine, Gary and Elsbach, Elizabeth. 2000. Ethnography and experiment in social psychological theory building: Tactics for integrating qualitative field data with quantitative lab data. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 5176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Kenneth. 2002. Getting in the door: Sampling and completing elite interviews. PS: Political Science & Politics, 35(4), 669–72.Google Scholar
Grønkjær, Mette, Curtis, Tine, de Crespigny, Charlotte, and Delmar, Charlotte. 2011. Analysing group interaction in focus group research: Impact on content and the role of the moderator. Qualitative Studies, 2(1), 1630.Google Scholar
Hall, Jeffrey B., Lindgren, Joakim, and Sowada, Moritz G.. 2019. Inspectors as information-seekers. In Walle, Steven van de and Raaphorst, Nadine, eds., Inspectors and Enforcement at the Front Line of Government. New York: Palgrave, pp. 3558.Google Scholar
Harvey, William S. 2011. Strategies for conducting elite interviews. Qualitative Research, 11(4), 431–41.Google Scholar
Hutter, Bridget M. 1997. Compliance: Regulation and Environment. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivankova, Nataliya and Stick, Sheldon. 2006. Students’ persistence in a distributed doctoral program in educational leadership in higher education: A mixed-methods study. Research in Higher Education, 48(1), 93136.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert A., Gunningham, Neil, and Thornton, Dorothy. 2011. Fear, duty, and regulatory compliance: Lessons from three research projects. In Parker, Christine and Nielsen, Vibeke Lehmann, eds., Explaining Compliance: Business Responses to Regulation. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 3758.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert, and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitzinger, Jenny. 2005. Focus group research: Using group dynamics to explore perceptions, experiences and understandings. In Holloway, Immy, ed., Qualitative Research in Health Care. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press, pp. 5670.Google Scholar
Krueger, Richard A. 1988. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Krueger, Richard A. and Casey, Mary Anne. 2008. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, 4th ed., London, Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Yvonna S. and Guba, Egon G.. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Lynch, Julie. n.d. Summary of Focus Group Discussions with Screen Printers and Lithographers for the Design for the Environment Printing Project (epa.gov).Google Scholar
Marshall, Catherine and Rossman, Gretchen B.. 1999. Designing Qualitative Research, 3rd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Merriam, Sharan B. and Tisdell, Elizabeth J.. 2016. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation, 4th ed., San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Parker, Christine and Nielsen, Vibeke Lehmann. 2011. Introduction. In Parker, Christine and Nielsen, Vibeke Lehmann, eds., Explaining Compliance: Business Responses to Regulation. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 136.Google Scholar
Pautz, Michelle C. 2009a. Trust between regulators and the regulated: A case study of environmental inspectors and facility personnel in Virginia. Politics & Policy, 37(5), 1047–72.Google Scholar
Pautz, Michelle C. 2009b. Perceptions of the regulated community in environmental policy: The view from below. Review of Policy Research, 26(5), 533–50.Google Scholar
Pautz, Michelle C. 2010. Front-line regulators and their approach to environmental regulation in Southwest Ohio. Review of Policy Research, 27(6), 761–80.Google Scholar
Pautz, Michelle C. and Rinfret, Sara R.. 2013. The Lilliputians of Environmental Regulation: The Perspective of State Regulators. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pautz, Michelle, Jones, John C., and Hoflund, A. Bryce. 2018. On the front lines in school cafeterias: The trials and tribulations of food service directors. In Hoflund, A. Bryce, Jones, John C., and Pautz, Michelle C., eds., The Intersection of Food and Public Health: Current Policy Challenges and Solutions. New York: Routledge, pp. 121–62.Google Scholar
Pham, Mai T., Jones, Andria Q., Sargeant, Jan M., Marshall, Barbara J., and Dewey, Catherine E.. 2010. A qualitative exploration of the perceptions and information needs of public health inspectors responsible for food safety. BMC Public Health. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-345.Google Scholar
Rubin, Herbert J. and Rubin, Irene S.. 2005. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data, 2nd ed., Washington, DC: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Rubin, Herbert J. and Rubin, Irene S.. 2012. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data, 3rd ed., Washington, DC: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Sim, Julius and Waterfield, Jackie. 2019. Focus group methodology: Some ethical challenges. Quality & Quantity, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11135-019–00914-5.Google Scholar
Traynor, Michael. 2015. Focus group research. Nursing Standard, 29(37), 44–8.Google Scholar
van de Walle, Steven and Raaphorst, Nadine. 2019. Introduction: The social dynamics of daily inspection work. In Walle, Steven van de and Raaphorst, Nadine, eds., Inspectors and Enforcement at the Front Line of Government. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 110.Google Scholar
Woliver, Laura R. 2002. Ethical dilemmas in personal interviewing. PS: Political Science and Politics, 32(2) 677–8.Google Scholar

References

Aberbach, Joel D. and Rockman, Bert A.. 2002. Conducting and coding elite interviews. PS: Political Science and Politics, 35(4), 673–6.Google Scholar
Alvesson, Mats. 2003. Beyond neopositivists, romantic, and localists: A reflexive approach to interviews in organizational research. The Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Andrew, and Elman, Colin. 2006. Qualitative research: Recent developments in case study methods. Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 455–76.Google Scholar
Benson, Michael L. 1985. Denying the guilty mind: Accounting for involvement in a white‐collar crime.Criminology, 23(4), 583607.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John. 1985. Corporate crime research: Why two interviewers are needed. Sociology, 19(1), 136–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, John L., Quincy, Charles, Osserman, Jordan, and Pedersen, Ove K.. 2013. Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: Problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(3), 294320.Google Scholar
Chassé, Sonia and Boiral, Olivier. 2017. Legitimizing corporate (un) sustainability: A case study of passive SMEs. Organization & Environment, 30(4), 324–45.Google Scholar
Dabney, Dean. 1995. Neutralization and deviance in the workplace: Theft of supplies and medicines by hospital nurses. Deviant Behavior, 16(4), 313–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DePaulo, Bella M., Lindsay, James J., Malone, Brian E. et al. 2003. Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 74118.Google Scholar
Dodge, Mary and Geis, Gilbert. 2006. Fieldwork with the elite: Interviewing white-collar criminals. In Hobbs, Dick and Wright, Richard, eds., The Sage Handbook of Fieldwork. London: Sage Publications, p. 79.Google Scholar
Friese, Susanne. 2019. Qualitative Data Analysis with ATLAS. Ti. New York: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 2004. What is a case study and what is it good for? American Political Science Review, 98(2), 341–54.Google Scholar
Goldstraw-White, Janice. 2011. White-Collar Crime: Accounts of Offending Behavior. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hill, Clara E., Thompson, Barbara J., and Ladany, Nicholas. 2003. Therapist use of silence in therapy: A survey. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 59(4), 513–24.Google Scholar
Lee, David. 1993. White collar crime and the financial sector – gathering the evidence. Commonwealth Law Bulletin, 19(4), 1932–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lokanan, Mark Eshwar. 2018. The application of cognitive interviews to financial crimes. Journal of Financial Crime, 25(3), 882–90.Google Scholar
Morse, Janice M. 1994. Emerging from the data: The cognitive processes of analysis in qualitative inquiry. In Morse, Janice M., ed., Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Pershing, Jana L. 2003. To snitch or not to snitch? Applying the concept of neutralization techniques to the enforcement of occupational misconduct. Sociological Perspectives, 46(2), 149–78.Google Scholar
Petintseva, Olga, Faria, Rita, and Eski, Yarin. 2020. Interviewing Elites, Experts, and the Powerful in Criminology. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rihoux, Benoît and Ragin, Charles C.. 2009. Configurational Comparative Methods, Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Schneider, Carsten Q. and Wagemann, Claudius. 2010. Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets. Comparative Sociology, 9(3), 397418.Google Scholar
Sykes, Gresham M. and Matza, David. 1957. Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency.American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–70.Google Scholar
Turner III, Daniel W. 2010. Qualitative interview design: A practical guide for novice investigators. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 754.Google Scholar
van Onna, Joost. 2018. Blurred lines: A study of white-collar crime involvement. PhD Thesis, Defended at the Free University of Amsterdam, July 5, 2018.Google Scholar
van Rooij, Benjamin. 2006. Regulating Land and Pollution in China, Lawmaking, Compliance, and Enforcement; Theory and Cases. Leiden: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar
van Rooij, Benjamin. 2016. Weak enforcement strong deterrence: Dialogues with Chinese lawyers about tax evasion and compliance. Law and Social Inquiry, 41(2), 288310.Google Scholar
Yan, Huiqi, van der Heijden, Jeroen, and van Rooij, Benjamin. 2017. Symmetric and asymmetric motivations for compliance and violation: A crisp set qualitative comparative analysis of Chinese farmers. Regulation & Governance, 11(1), 6480.Google Scholar
Yan, Huiqi, van Rooij, Benjamin, and van der Heijden, Jeroen. 2015. Contextual compliance: Situational and subjective cost-benefit decisions about pesticides by Chinese farmers. Law & Policy, 37(3), 240–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, Huiqi, van Rooij, Benjamin, and van der Heijden, Jeroen. 2016. The enforcement–compliance paradox: Implementation of pesticide regulation in China. China Information, 30(209–231), 123.Google Scholar

References

Adair, John G. 1984. The Hawthorne effect: A reconsideration of the methodological artifact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2), 334.Google Scholar
Almond, Paul and Gray, Garry C.. 2017. Frontline safety: Understanding the workplace as a site of regulatory engagement. Law & Policy 39(1), 526.Google Scholar
Angrosino, Michael and Rosenberg, Judith. 2011. Observations on observation. In Denzin, Norman K. and Lincoln, Yvonna S., eds., The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications, pp. 467–78.Google Scholar
Baxter, Ryan J., Holderness, D. Kip Jr., and Wood, David A.. 2017. The effects of gamification on corporate compliance training: A partial replication and field study of true office anti-corruption training programs. Journal of Forensic Accounting Research, 2(1), A20A30.Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew and Elman, Colin. 2006. Qualitative research: Recent developments in case study methods. Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 455–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, Michael L., Madensen, Tamara D., and Eck, John E.. 2009. White-collar crime from an opportunity perspective. In Simpson, Sally and Weisburd, David, eds., The Criminology of White Collar Crime. New York: Springer, pp. 175–95.Google Scholar
Bernard, H. Russell. 1995. Research Methods in Anthropology, Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, Valerie. 2003a. Tax system integrity and compliance: The democratic management of the tax system. In Braithwaite, Valerie, ed., Taxing Democracy: Understanding Tax Avoidance and Evasion. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing, pp. 271–90.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, Valerie, ed. 2003b. Taxing Democracy. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, Valerie, Braithwaite, John, Gibson, Diane, and Makkai, Toni. 1994. Regulatory styles motivational postures and nursing home compliance. Law & Policy, 16(4), 363–94.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, Valerie, Murphy, Kristina, and Reinhart, Monika. 2007. Taxation threat, motivational postures, and responsive regulation. Law & Policy, 29(1), 137–58.Google Scholar
Chemnitz, Christine. 2012. The impact of food safety and quality standards on developing countries agricultural producers and exports. PhD thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Landwirtschaftlich-Gärtnerische Fakultät.Google Scholar
CoffeeJr., John C. 1991. Does unlawful mean criminal: Reflections on the disappearing tort/crime distinction in American law. BUL Rev., 71, 193.Google Scholar
Darley, John M., Carlsmith, Kevin M., and Robinson, Paul H.. 2001. The ex ante function of the criminal law. Law and Society Review, 35(1), 165–90.Google Scholar
Dixon-Woods, Mary. 2003. What can ethnography do for quality and safety in health care? BMJ Quality & Safety, 12(5), 326–7.Google Scholar
Eckmanns, Tim, Bessert, Jan, Behnke, Michael, Gastmeier, Petra, and Henning, Rüden. 2006. Compliance with antiseptic hand rub use in intensive care units the Hawthorne effect. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 27(9), 931–4.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B, and Talesh, Shauhin A.. 2011. To comply or not to comply – that isn’t the question: how organizations construct the meaning of compliance. In Parker, Christine and Nielsen, Vibeke Lehmann, eds., Explaining Compliance: Business Responses to Regulation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 103–22.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., Petterson, Stephen, Chambliss, Elizabeth, and Erlanger, Howard S.. 1991. Legal ambiguity and the politics of compliance: Affirmative action officers’ dilemma. Law & Policy, 13(1), 7397.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In Geertz, Clifford, ed., The Interpretation of Cultures, Selected Essays by Clifford Geertz. New York: Basic Books, pp. 330.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1983. Local knowledge: Fact and law in comparative perspective. In Geertz, Clifford, ed., Local Knowledge. New York: Basic Books, pp. 167234.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 2000. Deep play: Notes on the Balinese cockfight. In Culture and Politics. Springer, pp. 175201.Google Scholar
Gray, Garry C. 2002. A socio-legal ethnography of the right to refuse dangerous work. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, 24, 133–69.Google Scholar
Gray, Garry C. 2006. The regulation of corporate violations punishment, compliance, and the blurring of responsibility. British Journal of Criminology, 46(5), 875–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Garry C. 2009. The responsibilization strategy of health and safety neo-liberalism and the reconfiguration of individual responsibility for risk. British Journal of Criminology, 49(3), 326–42.Google Scholar
Gray, Garry C. and Silbey, Susan S.. 2014. Governing inside the organization: Interpreting regulation and compliance. American Journal of Sociology, 120(1), 96145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffiths, John. 1986. What is legal pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism, 24, 150.Google Scholar
Gunningham, Neil and Sinclair, Darren. 2002. Leaders and Laggards, Next-Generation Environmental Regulation. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing.Google Scholar
Heimer, Carol A. 1999. Competing institutions: Law, medicine, and family in neonatal intensive care. Law & Society Review, 33(1), 1766.Google Scholar
Henson, Spencer and Heasman, Michael. 1998. Food safety regulation and the firm: Understanding the compliance process. Food Policy, 23(1), 923.Google Scholar
Hutter, B. M. 1997. Compliance: Regulation and Environment. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Pauline T. 1999. Norms, learning and law: Exploring the influences of workers’ legal knowledge. University of Illinois Legal Review, 1999(2), 447516.Google Scholar
Kluin, Marieke H. A. 2014. Optic compliance: Enforcement and compliance in the Dutch chemical industry. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology.Google Scholar
Ko, Kilkon, Mendeloff, John, and Gray, Wayne. 2010. The role of inspection sequence in compliance with the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) standards: Interpretations and implications. Regulation & Governance, 4(1), 4870.Google Scholar
Lange, Bettina. 1999. Compliance construction in the context of environmental regulation. Social & Legal Studies 8(4), 549–67.Google Scholar
Leary, Thomas B. 1990. The Commission’s new option that favors judicial discretion in corporate sentencing. Fed. Sent’g Rep., 3, 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, Myles, Paradis, Elise, Gropper, Michael A., Reeves, Scott, and Kitto, Simon. 2014. Applying ethnography to the study of context in healthcare quality and safety. BMJ Quality & Safety, 23(2), 99105.Google Scholar
Li, Na and van Rooij., Benjamin 2021 (forthcoming). Law Lost, compliance found: A frontline understanding of the non-linear nature of business and employee responses to law. Journal of Business Ethics.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1926. Crime and Custom in Savage Society. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1928. Argonauts of the Western Pacific, AN Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Mascini, Peter and Wijk, Eelco van. 2009. Responsive regulation at the Dutch Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority: An empirical assessment of assumptions underlying the theory. Regulation & Governance, 3(1), 2747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, Jeremy C., Antón, Annie I., and Swire, Peter. 2011. A legal cross-references taxonomy for identifying conflicting software requirements. Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), 2011 19th IEEE International.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 1988. Legal pluralism. Law and Society Review, 22(5), 869–96.Google Scholar
Moore, Sally Falk. 1973. Law and social change: The semi-autonomous social field as an appropriate subject of study. Law & Society Review, 7, 719–46.Google Scholar
Musante, Kathleen and DeWalt, Billie R.. 2010. Participant Observation: A Guide for Fieldworkers. Walnut Creek, CA: Rowman Altamira.Google Scholar
Nader, Laura. 2002. Moving on, comprehending anthropologies of law. In Starr, June and Goodale, Mark, eds., Practicing Ethnography in Law. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 190201.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, Karen. 2012. Ethnographic Methods. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Parker, Christine and Nielsen, Vibeke. 2009a. The challenge of empirical research on business compliance in regulatory capitalism. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 5, 4570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Christine and Nielsen, Vibeke. 2009b. Corporate compliance systems: Could they make any difference? Administration & Society, 41(1), 337.Google Scholar
Parker, Christine and Nielsen, Vibeke Lehmann. 2011. Deterrence and the impact of calculative thinking on business compliance with regulation. The Antitrust Bulletin, 56(2), 377426.Google Scholar
Platt, Jennifer. 1983. The development of the participant observation method in sociology: Origin myth and history. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 19(4), 379–93.Google Scholar
Riggs, Fred W. 1964. Administration in Developing Countries, The Theory of the Prismatic Society. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Rorie, Melissa, Simpson, Sally S., and Boppre, Breanna. 2018. Factorial survey research in the study of environmental regulatory processes. In van Boom, Willem H., Desmet, Pieter and Mascini, Peter, eds.,Empirical Legal Research in Action. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 137–72.Google Scholar
Seawright, Jason and Gerring, John. 2008. Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294308.Google Scholar
Short, Jodi L. and Toffel, Michael W.. 2008. Coerced confessions: Self-policing in the shadow of the regulator. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 24(1), 4571.Google Scholar
Stam, Erik and Verbeeten, Frank. 2017. Tax compliance over the firm life course. International Small Business Journal, 35(1), 99115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talesh, Shauhin A. 2009. The privatization of public legal rights: How manufacturers construct the meaning of consumer law. Law & Society Review, 43(3), 527–62.Google Scholar
Talesh, Shauhin A. 2015. Rule‐intermediaries in action: How state and business stakeholders influence the meaning of consumer rights in regulatory governance arrangements. Law & Policy, 37(1–2), 131.Google Scholar
Thornton, Dorothy, Gunningham, Neil, and Kagan, Robert A.. 2005. General deterrence and corporate environmental behavior. Law & Policy, 27(2), 262–88.Google Scholar
van Rooij, Benjamin. 2006. Regulating Land and Pollution in China, Lawmaking, Compliance, and Enforcement; Theory and Cases. Leiden: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar
van Rooij, Benjamin. 2016. Weak enforcement strong deterrence: Dialogues with Chinese lawyers about tax evasion and compliance. Law and Social Inquiry, 41(2), 288310.Google Scholar
van Rooij, Benjamin. 2021 (forthcoming). Do people know the law? Empirical evidence about legal knowledge and its implications for compliance. In van Rooij, Benjamin and Sokol, D. Daniel, eds., Cambridge Handbook of Compliance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Rooij, Benjamin and Fine, Adam. 2018 Toxic corporate culture: Assessing organizational processes of deviancy. Administrative Sciences, 8(3), 2361.Google Scholar
van Rooij, Benjamin and Fine, Adam. 2021 (forthcoming). The opportunity approach to compliance. In van Rooij, Benjamin and Sokol, D. Daniel, eds., Cambridge Handbook on Compliance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vaughan, Diane. 1997. The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
von Benda-Beckmann, Franz. 2006. The multiple edges of law: Dealing with legal pluralism in development practice. In Sage, Caroline and Woolcock, Michael, eds., The World Bank Legal Review: Law, Equity, and Development. Washington, DC: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 5186.Google Scholar
Wu, Yunmei and van Rooij., Benjamin 2021. Compliance dynamism: Capturing the polynormative and situational nature of business responses to law. Journal of Business Ethics, 168, 579–91.Google Scholar
Yan, Huiqi, van der Heijden, Jeroen, and van Rooij., Benjamin 2017. Symmetric and asymmetric motivations for compliance and violation: A crisp set qualitative comparative analysis (csQCA) of Chinese farmers. Regulation & Governance, 11, 6480.Google Scholar
Yan, Huiqi, van Rooij, Benjamin, and van der Heijden, Jeroen. 2015. Contextual compliance: Situational and subjective cost-benefit decisions about pesticides by Chinese farmers. Law & Policy, 37(3), 240–63.Google Scholar
Yan, Huiqi, van Rooij, Benjamin, and van der Heijden, Jeroen. 2016. The enforcement–compliance paradox: Implementation of pesticide regulation in China. China Information, 30(209–231), 123.Google Scholar
Ziman, Roxanne, Espin, Sherry, Grant, Rachel E., and Kitto, Simon. 2018. Looking beyond the checklist: An ethnography of interprofessional operating room safety cultures. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 32(5), 575–83.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×