Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-jb2ch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-02-23T17:13:59.653Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part 4 - Mixed Methods and Building on Existing Compliance Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2022

Melissa Rorie
Affiliation:
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Benjamin van Rooij
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam, School of Law
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Measuring Compliance
Assessing Corporate Crime and Misconduct Prevention
, pp. 239 - 301
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Almond, Paul and Esbester, Mike. 2018. Regulatory inspection and the changing legitimacy of health and safety. Regulation & Governance, 12, 4663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Julia. 1997. Rules and Regulators (Oxford Socio-Legal Studies). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bowman, Megan. 2015. Banking on Climate Change: How Finance Actors and Transnational Regulatory Regimes are Responding. Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John. 2016. In search of Donald Campbell. Criminology & Public Policy, 15, 417–37.Google Scholar
Bryman, Alan. 2006. Integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 6, 97113.Google Scholar
Buckley, Jennifer A. 2016. Food safety regulation and small processing: A case study of interactions between processors and inspectors, Food Policy, 51, 7482.Google Scholar
Chan, Janet and Bennett Moses., Lyria 2016. Is Big Data challenging criminology? Theoretical Criminology, 20(1), 2139Google Scholar
Chanin, Joshua and Welsh, Megan. 2020. Examining the validity of traffic stop data: A mixed-methods analysis of police officer compliance. Police Quarterly. doi: 10.1177/1098611120933644.Google Scholar
Creswell, John W. 2009. Editorial: Mapping the field of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(2), 95108.Google Scholar
Creswell, John W. and Plano Clark, Vicki L.. 2006. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Creswell, John W. and Tashakkori, Abbas. 2007. Differing perspectives on mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 303–8.Google Scholar
Currie, Wendy L., Gozman, Daniel P., and Seddon, Jonathan J. M.. 2018. Dialectic tensions in the financial markets: A longitudinal study of pre- and post-crisis regulatory technology. Journal of Information Technology, 33(4), 304–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Loë, Rob C., Melnychuk, Natalya, Murray, Dan, and Plummer, Ryan. 2016. Advancing the State of Policy Delphi practice: A systematic review evaluating methodological evolution, innovation, and opportunities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 104, 7888.Google Scholar
Dean, Olivia and Marshall., Shelley 2020. A race to the middle of the pack: An analysis of slavery and human trafficking statements submitted by Australian banks under the UK Modern Slavery Act. Australian Journal of Human Rights, 26(1), 4673.Google Scholar
Denzin, Norman K. 2010. Moments, mixed methods, and paradigm dialogs. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 19.Google Scholar
Drahos, Peter. 2017. Social-psychological foundations and methodological issues. In Drahos, Peter, ed., Regulatory Theory: Foundations and Applications. Canberra: Australian National University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B. and Talesh., Shauhin A. 2011. To comply or not to comply – that isn’t the question: How organizations construct the meaning of compliance. In Parker, Christine and Nielsen, Vibeke Lehman, eds., Explaining Compliance: Business Responses to Regulation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 103–22.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., Uggen, Christopher, and Erlanger., Howard S. 1999. The endogeneity of legal regulation: Grievance procedures as rational myth. American Journal of Sociology, 105(2), 406–54.Google Scholar
Edwards, Adam. 2015. Realist criminology. Criminal Justice Matters, 99(1), 26–7.Google Scholar
Edwards, Adam and Levi, Michael. 2008. Researching the organization of serious crimes. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 8(4), 363–88.Google Scholar
Edwards, Adam, Hughes, Gordon, and Lord, Nicholas. 2013. Urban security in Europe: Translating a concept in public criminology. European Journal of Criminology, 10(3), 260–83.Google Scholar
Edwards, Adam, Housley, William, Williams, Matthew, Sloan, Luke, and Williams, Malcolm. 2013. Digital social research, social media and the sociological imagination: Surrogacy, augmentation and re-orientation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(3), 245–60.Google Scholar
Enachescu, Janina, Olsen, Jerome, Kogler, Christoph et al. 2019. The role of emotions in tax compliance behavior: A mixed-methods approach. Journal of Economic Psychology, 74, 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fielding, Nigel G. 2012. Triangulation and mixed methods designs: Data integration with new research technologies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 124–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frawley, Shayna. 2018. The decision to comply with workplace law: A mixed-methods investigation of human resource practitioners, PhD dissertation, York University, Toronto, Ontario.Google Scholar
Gilad, Sharon. 2014. Beyond endogeneity: How firms and regulators co-construct the meaning of process-oriented regulation. Law and Policy, 36(2), 134–64.Google Scholar
Gorski, Philip S. 2013. What is critical realism? And why should you care? Contemporary Sociology, 42(5), 658–70.Google Scholar
Gray, David E. 2017. Doing Research in the Real World. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Gray, Garry. 2006. The regulation of corporate violations: Punishment, compliance, and the blurring of responsibility. British Journal of Criminology, 46(5), 875–92.Google Scholar
Gray, Garry and Silbey, Susan S.. 2014. Governing inside the organization: Interpreting regulation and compliance. American Journal of Sociology, 120(1), 96145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, Garry and van Rooij, Benjamin. 2021. Regulatory disempowerment: How enabling and controlling forms of power obstruct citizen-based regulation. Regulation & Governance, 15, 800–21.Google Scholar
Gunningham, Neil, Kagan, Robert A., and Thornton, Dorothy. 2004. Social license and environmental protection: Why businesses go beyond compliance. Law & Social Inquiry, 29(2), 307–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunningham, Neil, Thornton, Dorothy, and Kagan., Robert A. 2005. Motivating management: Corporate compliance in environmental protection. Law and Policy, 27(2), 289316.Google Scholar
Haines, Fiona. 2011. The Paradox of Regulation: What Regulation Can Achieve and What It Cannot. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Keith. 1984. Environment and Enforcement: Regulation and the Social Definition of Pollution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Keith. 2002. Law as Last Resort: Prosecution Decision-Making in a Regulatory Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Keith and Hutter., Bridget M. 1993. The response of business to social regulation in England and Wales: An enforcement perspective. Law & Policy, 15(3), 199217.Google Scholar
Hutter, Bridget M. 1997. Compliance: Regulation and Environment: Oxford Socio-Legal Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutter, Bridget and Lloyd-Bostock, Sally, eds. 2017. Regulatory Crisis: Negotiating the Consequences of Risk, Disasters and Crises. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Burke R. and Onwuegbuzie., Anthony J. 2004. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come, Educational Researcher, 33(7), 1426.Google Scholar
Jordanoska, Aleksandra. 2021. Regulatory enforcement against organizational insiders: Interactions in the pursuit of individual accountability. Regulation & Governance, 15(2), 298316.Google Scholar
KCL (King’s College London) Policy Institute. 2020. Compliance or complacence? Attitudes to UK lockdown rules, King’s College London Policy Institute. www.kcl.ac.uk/policy-institute/assets/attitudes-to-uk-lockdown-rules.pdf.Google Scholar
Kelly, Erin L. 2010. Failure to update: An institutional perspective on noncompliance with the Family and Medical Leave Act. Law & Society Review, 44(1), 3366.Google Scholar
Kooistra, Emmeke B. and van Rooij, Benjamin. 2020. Pandemic Compliance: A systematic review about influences on social distancing behaviour during the first wave of the COVID-19 outbreak. Working Paper Published in SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3738047.Google Scholar
Krawiec, Kimberly D. 2003. Cosmetic compliance and the failure of negotiated governance. Washington University Law Quarterly, 81(2), 487544.Google Scholar
Kuiper, Malouke Esra, de Bruijn, Anne Leonore, Folmer, Chris Reinders et al. 2020. The Intelligent Lockdown: Compliance with COVID-19 Mitigation Measures in the Netherlands (May 6, 2020). Amsterdam Law School Research Paper No. 2020-20, General Subserie Research Paper No. 2020-02. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3598215 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3598215.Google Scholar
Lange, Bettina. 1999. Compliance construction in the context of environmental regulation. Social & Legal Studies, 8(4), 549–67.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. and Alford, John R.. 1980. Can government regulate safety: The coal mine example. American Political Science Review, 74, 745–56.Google Scholar
Linstone, Harold. A. and Turoff, Murray. 2002. Introduction. In Linstone, Harold A. and Turoff, Murray, eds., The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications, pp. 112. www.is.njit.edu/pubs/delphibook/index.html.Google Scholar
Losoncz, Ibolya. 2017. Methodological approaches and considerations in regulatory research. In Drahos, Peter, ed., Regulatory Theory: Foundations and Applications. Canberra: Australian National University Press.Google Scholar
Maesschalck, Jeroen. 2021. Using Grid-Group Cultural Theory to assess approaches to the prevention of corporate and occupational crime: The EU as a natural experiment. In Lord, Nicholas, Inzelt, Éva, Huisman, Wim, and Faria, Rira, eds., European White-Collar Crime: Exploring the Nature of European Realities. Bristol: Bristol University Press, pp. 1738.Google Scholar
Maggetti, Martino, Gilardi, Fabrizio, and Radaelli., Claudio M. 2013. Designing Research in the Social Sciences. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Mason, Jennifer. 2006. Real Life Methods Working Papers: Six strategies for mixing methods and linking data in social science research; ESRC / NCRM Working Paper Series, 4/06. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/482/1/0406_six%2520strategies%2520for%2520mixing%2520methods.pdf.Google Scholar
McBarnet, Doreen. 2006. After Enron will “whiter than white collar crime” still wash? British Journal of Criminology, 46(6), 1091–109.Google Scholar
McChesney, Katrina and Aldridge., Jill 2019. Weaving an interpretivist stance throughout mixed methods research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 42(3), 225–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertens, Donna. 2007. Transformative paradigm: Mixed methods and social justice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 212–25.Google Scholar
Mertens, Donna. 2018. Mixed Methods Design in Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Mirchandani, Kiran, Vosko, Leah F., Soni-Sinha, Urvashi et al. 2018. Methodological k/nots: Designing research on the enforcement of labor standards. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(2), 133–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monciardini, David, Bernaz, Nadia, and Andhov, Alexandra. 2021. The organizational dynamics of compliance with the UK Modern Slavery Act in the food and tobacco sector. Business & Society, 60(2), 288340.Google Scholar
Nastasi, Bonnie K. and Hitchcock, John. 2015. Mixed Methods Research and Culture-Specific Interventions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
National Science Foundation. 2012. Solicitation 12–499: Core Techniques and Technologies for Advancing Big Data Science & Engineering (BIGDATA). www.nsf.gov/pubs/2012/nsf12499/nsf12499.pdf.Google Scholar
Pagliari, Stefano and Wilf, Meredith. 2021. Regulatory novelty after financial crises: Evidence from international banking and securities standards, 1975–2016. Regulation & Governance, 15, 933–51.Google Scholar
Palinkas, Lawrence A., Mendon, Sapna J., Hamilton, Alison B. et al. 2019. Innovations in mixed methods evaluations. Annual Review of Public Health, 40(1), 423–42.Google Scholar
Parker, Christine and Nielsen., Vibeke 2009. The challenge of empirical research on business compliance in regulatory capitalism. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 5, 4570.Google Scholar
Parker, Christine and Lehman Nielsen, Vibeke. 2011. Introduction: From regulation to compliance. In Parker, Christine and Lehman Nielsen, Vibeke, eds., Explaining Compliance: Business Responses to Regulation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 133.Google Scholar
Patton, Michael Q. 2014. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice, 4th ed., London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
PRA. 2020. Report: Evaluation of the Senior Managers and Certification Regime, Prudential Regulation Authority. www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/prudential-regulation/report/evaluation-of-smcr-2020.pdf?la=en&hash=151E78315E5C50E70A6B8B08AE3D5E93563D0168.Google Scholar
Reuters. 2017. Barclays, U.S. FERC near settlement of power market manipulation lawsuit. www.reuters.com/article/us-barclays-ferc-penalty-idUSKBN1CI21E.Google Scholar
Sayer, Andrew. 2010. Method in Social Science, revised 2nd ed., London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Simpson, Sally S. 2002. Corporate Crime, Law, and Social Control. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, Sally S. and Koper, Christopher S.. 1997. The changing of the guard: Top management characteristics, organizational strain, and antitrust offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 13(4), 373404.Google Scholar
Solymosi, Reka. 2019. Exploring spatial patterns of guardianship through civic technology platforms. Criminal Justice Review, 44(1), 4259.Google Scholar
Solymosi, Reka and Jordanoska, Aleksandra. 2021. Companies in Trouble: Exploring Debt, Insolvency and Corporate Noncompliance in the UK, Working Paper on file with the authors.Google Scholar
Solymosi, Reka, Jackson, Jonathan, Pósch, Krisztián et al. 2021. Functional and dysfunctional fear of COVID-19: A classification scheme. Crime Sci., 10(4), 123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Talesh, Shauhin. 2015. Legal intermediaries: How insurance companies construct the meaning of compliance with anti-discrimination laws. Law and Policy, 37, 209–39.Google Scholar
Timans, Rob, Wouters, Paul, and Heilbron, Johan. 2019. Mixed methods research: What it is and what it could be. Theoretical Sociology, 48, 193216.Google Scholar
Tinati, Ramine, Halford, Susan, Carr, Lesli, and Pope, Catherine. 2014. Big Data: Methodological challenges and approaches for sociological analysis. Sociology, 48(4), 663–81.Google Scholar
van Erp, Judith, Wallenburg, Iris, and Bal, Roland, 2020. Performance regulation in a networked healthcare system: From cosmetic to institutionalized compliance. Public Admin., 98, 4661.Google Scholar
van Rooij, Benjamin, de Bruijn, Anne Leonore, Folmer, Chris Reinders et al., 2020. Compliance with COVID-19 Mitigation Measures in the United States (April 22, 2020). Amsterdam Law School Research Paper No. 2020-21, General Subserie Research Paper No. 2020-03, UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2020-33. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3582626 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3582626.Google Scholar
van Rooij, Benjamin, Fine, Adam, Zhang, Yanyan, and Wu, Yunmei. 2017. Comparative compliance: Digital piracy, deterrence, social norms, and duty in China and the United States, Law & Policy, 39, 7393.Google Scholar
Vickers, Ian, James, Philip, Smallbone, David, and Baldock, Robert. 2005. Understanding small firm responses to regulation. Policy Studies, 26(2), 149–69.Google Scholar
Williams, James W. 2012. Policing the markets: Inside the black box of securities enforcement. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Winter, Søren C. and May, Peter J.. 2001. Motivation for compliance with environmental regulations. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20, 675–98.Google Scholar
Wisdom, Jennifer and Creswell., John W. 2013. Mixed Methods: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis While Studying Patient-Centered Medical Home Models. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. February 2013. AHRQ Publication No.13–0028-EF.Google Scholar
Wu, Yunmei and van Rooij, Benjamin. 2021 . Compliance dynamism: Capturing the polynormative and situational nature of business responses to law. Journal of Business Ethics, 168, 579–91.Google Scholar

References

Bebinger, Martha. 2019. Purdue Pharma Agrees to $270 Million Opioid Settlement with Oklahoma. National Public Radio. https://knpr.org/npr/2019-03/purdue-pharma-agrees-270-million-opioid-settlement-oklahoma?gclid=EAIaIQobChMI8_Ptm_rM6AIVkYrICh2mmAYIEAAYAiAAEgK mIPD_BwE.Google Scholar
Berry, Christopher M., Ones, Deniz S., and Sackett, Paul R.. 2007. Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: a review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 410–24.Google Scholar
Bøg, Martin, Filges, Trine, Brännström, Lars, Jørgensen, Anne-Marie K., and Fredrikksson, Maja K.. 2017. 12‐step programs for reducing illicit drug use. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 13, 1149.Google Scholar
Braga, Anthony and Weisburd, David L.. 2012. The effects of pulling levers focused deterrence strategies on crime. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 8, 190.Google Scholar
Braga, Anthony, Papachristos, Andrew, and Hureau, David. 2012. Hot spots policing effects on crime. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 8, 196.Google Scholar
Brierley, John A. and Cowton, Christopher J.. 2000. Putting meta-analysis to work: Accountants’ organizational-professional conflict. Journal of Business Ethics, 24, 343–53.Google Scholar
Byron, Kris and Post, Corinne. 2016. Women on boards of directors and corporate social performance: A meta-analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(4), 428–42.Google Scholar
Chang, Chu-Hsiang, Johnson, Russell E., and Yang, Liu-Qin. 2007. Emotional strain and organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis and review. Work & Stress, 21(4), 312–32.Google Scholar
Christian, Michael, S., Wallace, J. Craig, Bradley, Jill C., and Burke, Michael J.. 2009. Workplace safety: A meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1103–27.Google Scholar
Clarke, Sharon. 2006. The relationship between safety climate and safety performance: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(4), 315–27.Google Scholar
Clarke, Sharon. 2013. Safety leadership: A meta-analytic review of transformational and transactional leadership styles as antecedents of safety behaviours. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86, 2249.Google Scholar
Cohen-Charash, Yochi and Spector, Paul E.. 2001. The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 278321.Google Scholar
Colquitt, Jason A., Conlon, Donald E., Wesson, Michael J., Porter, Christopher O. L. H., and Ng, K. Y.. 2001. Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425–45.Google Scholar
Colquitt, Jason A., Scott, Brent A., Rodell, Jessica B. et al. 2013. Justice at the millennium, a decade later: A meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(2), 199236.Google Scholar
Cullen, Francis and Gendreau, Paul. 2000. Assessing correctional rehabilitation policy, practice, and prospects. Criminal Justice, 3, 109–75.Google Scholar
Dalal, Reeshad S. 2005. A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1241–55.Google Scholar
Egli, Nicole, Pina, Miriam, Christensen, Pernille S., Aebi, Marcelo, and Killias, Martin. 2009. Effects of drug substitution programs on offending among drug‐addicts. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 5, 140.Google Scholar
Feder, Lynette, Wilson, David B., and Austin, Sabrina. 2008. Court‐mandated interventions for individuals convicted of domestic violence. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 4, 146.Google Scholar
Garcia-Meca, Emma and Sanchez-Ballesta, Juan P.. 2009. Corporate governance and earnings management: A meta-analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(5), 594610.Google Scholar
Garcia-Meca, Emma and Sanchez-Ballesta, Juan P.. 2010. That association of board independence and ownership concentration with voluntary disclosure: A meta-analysis. European Accounting Review, 19(3), 603–27.Google Scholar
Garrido, Vicente and Morales, Luz A.. 2007. Serious (violent or chronic) juvenile offenders: A systematic review of treatment effectiveness in secure corrections. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 3, 146.Google Scholar
Gough, David, Oliver, Sandy, and Thomas, James. 2017. An Introduction to Systematic Review. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hanratty, Jennifer. 2018. What Is the Difference Between a Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis? Campbell Collaboration UK & Ireland Meta-Evidence Blog. http://meta-evidence.co.uk/difference-systematic-review-meta-analysis/.Google Scholar
Higginson, Angela, Benier, Kathryn, Shenderovich, Yulia et al. 2015. Preventive interventions to reduce youth involvement in gangs and gang crime in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 11, 1176.Google Scholar
Hunter, John E. and Schmidt, Frank L., 2004. Methods of Meta-Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Ilies, Remus, Nahrgang, Jennifer D., and Morgeson, Frederick P. . 2007 . Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 269–77.Google Scholar
Inaam, Zgarni and Khamoussi, Halioui. 2015. Audit committee effectiveness, audit quality and earnings management: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Law and Management, 58(2), 179–96.Google Scholar
James, Michael and Ortiz, Jorge L.. 2018. Jury orders Monsanto to pay $289 million to cancer patient in Roundup lawsuit. USA Today. www.usatoday.com/story/news/2018/08/10/jury-orders-monsanto-pay-289-million-cancer-patient-roundup-lawsuit/962297002/.Google Scholar
Khlif, Hichem and Souissi, Mohsen. 2010. The determinants of corporate disclosure: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 18(3), 189219.Google Scholar
Kish-Gephart, Jennifer J., Harrison, David A., and Trevino, Linda Klebe. 2010. Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 131.Google Scholar
Kluin, Marieke. , Blokland, Arjan, Huisman, Wim et al. 2018. Patronen in regelovertreding in de chemische industrie. Journal of Criminology, 60(4), 421–56.Google Scholar
Koper, Christopher S. and Mayo‐Wilson, Evan. 2012. Police strategies to reduce illegal possession and carrying of firearms: Effects on gun crime. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 8, 153.Google Scholar
Lau, Vivian C. S., Au, Wing Tung, and Ho, Jane M. C.. 2003. Review of antecedents of counterproductive behavior in organizations. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18(1), 7399.Google Scholar
Leitao, Sara and Greiner, Birgit A.. 2016. Organisational safety climate and occupational accidents and injuries: An epidemiology-based systematic review. Work & Stress, 30(1), 7190.Google Scholar
LePine, Jeffrey A., Erez, Amir, and Johnson, Diane E.. 2002. The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 5265.Google Scholar
Lin, Jerry W. and Hwang, Mark I.. 2010. Audit quality, corporate governance, and earnings management: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Auditing 14, 5777.Google Scholar
Lipsey, Mark. W., and Wilson, David. 2001. Practical Meta-Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Lipsey, Mark W., Landenberger, Nana A., and Wilson, Sandra J.. 2007. Effects of cognitive‐behavioral programs for criminal offenders. Campbell Systematic Reviews 3, 127.Google Scholar
Mackey, Jeremy D., Frieder, Rachel E., Brees, Jeremy R., and Martinko, Mark J.. 2017. Abusive supervision: A meta-analysis and empirical review. Journal of Management 43(6), 1940–65.Google Scholar
Mackey, Jeremy D., McAllister, Charn P., Maher, Liam P., and Wang, Gang. 2019. Leaders and followers behaving badly: A meta-analytic examination of curvilinear relationships between destructive leadership and followers’ workplace behaviors. Personnel Psychology 72, 347.Google Scholar
Majumder, Md. Tofael H., Akter, Aklima, and Li, Xiaojing. 2017. Corporate governance and corporate social disclosures: A meta-analytical review. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 25(4), 434–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maroun, Warren. 2015. Culture, profitability, non-financial reporting and a meta analysis: Comments and observations. Meditari Accountancy Research, 23(3), 322–30.Google Scholar
Martin, Kelly D. and Cullen, John B.. 2006. Continuities and extensions of ethical climate theory: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 175–94.Google Scholar
Mazerolle, Lorraine, Soole, David W., and Rombouts, Sacha. 2007. Street-level drug law enforcement: A meta-analytic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 3(1), 147.Google Scholar
McLeod, Michael S., Payne, G. Tyge, and Evert, Robert E.. 2016. Organizational ethics research: A systematic review of methods and analytic techniques. Journal of Business Ethics, 134, 429–43.Google Scholar
Miao, Chao, Humphrey, Ronald H., and Qian, Shanshan. 2017. Are the emotionally intelligent good citizens or counterproductive? A meta-analysis of emotional intelligence and its relationship with organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 144–56.Google Scholar
Miao, Chao, Humphrey, Ronald H., and Qian, Shanshan. 2018. A cross-cultural meta-analysis of how leader emotional intelligence influences subordinate task performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of World Business, 53, 463–74.Google Scholar
Mikolawjewicz, Nicholas and Komarova, Svetlana. 2019. Meta-analytic methodology for basic research: A practical guide. Frontiers in Physiology, 10, 203–22.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Ojmarrh, Wilson, David B., Eggers, Amy, and MacKenzie, Doris L.. 2012. Drug courts’ effects on criminal offending for juveniles and adults. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 8, 187.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Ojmarrh, Wilson, David B., and MacKenzie, Doris L.. 2006. The effectiveness of incarceration‐based drug treatment on criminal behavior. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 2, 156.Google Scholar
Nohe, Christoph and Hertel, Guido. 2017. Transformational leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: A meta-analytic test of underlying mechanisms. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1364–76.Google Scholar
Organ, Dennis W. and Ryan, Katherine. 1995. A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 775802.Google Scholar
Ortas, Eduardo, Alvarez, Igor, and Zubeltzu, Eugenio. 2017. Firms’ board independence and corporate social performance: A meta-analysis. Sustainability, 9(6), 1006.Google Scholar
Ostroff, Cheri and Harrison, David A.. Meta-analysis, level of analysis, and best estimates of population correlations: Cautions for interpreting meta-analytic results in organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(2), 260–70.Google Scholar
Petrosino, Anthony, Turpin‐Petrosino, Carolyn, and Guckenburg, Sarah. 2010. Formal system processing of juveniles: Effects on delinquency. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 6, 188.Google Scholar
Petrosino, Anthony, Turpin‐Petrosino, Carolyn, Hollis‐Peel, Meghan E., and Lavenberg, Julia G.. 2013. Scared straight and other juvenile awareness programs for preventing juvenile delinquency: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 9, 155.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, Nathan P., Whiting, Steven W., Podsakoff, Philip M., and Blume, Brian D.. 2009. Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 122–41.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, Bradley and Thornton, Daniel B.. 2008. Meta-analysis and the accounting literature: The case of audit committee independence and financial reporting quality. European Accounting Review, 17(2), 305–30.Google Scholar
Popay, Jennie, Roberts, Helen, Sowden, Amanda et al. 2006. Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews: A Product from the ESRC Methods Programme. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.178.3100&rep=rep1&type=pdf.Google Scholar
Rorie, Melissa. 2013. Testing the influence of various “licenses” in motivating corporate environmental behavior. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park. Digital Repository at the University of Maryland. https://drum.lib.umd.edu/handle/1903/14103.Google Scholar
Rorie, Melissa, Alper, Mariel, Schell-Busey, Natalie, and Simpson, Sally S.. 2018. Using meta-analysis under conditions of definitional ambiguity: The case of corporate crime. Criminal Justice Studies, 31(1), 3861.Google Scholar
Salgado, Jesús F. 2002. The big five personality dimensions and counterproductive behaviors. International Journal of Selection & Assessment, 10(1/2), 117.Google Scholar
Samaha, Khaled, Khlif, Hichem, and Hussainey, Khaled. 2015. The impact of board and audit committee characteristics on voluntary disclosure: A meta-analysis. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 24, 1328.Google Scholar
Schell-Busey, Natalie. 2009. The deterrent effects of ethics codes for corporate crime: A meta-analysis. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park. Digital Repository at the University of Maryland. https://drum.lib.umd.edu/handle/1903/9289.Google Scholar
Schell-Busey, Natalie, Simpson, Sally S., Rorie, Melissa M., and Alper, Mariel. 2016. What works? A systematic review of corporate crime deterrence. Criminology & Public Policy, 15(2), 387416.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Jennifer and Steffensmeier, Darrell. 2018. Profile of top-executives in fraudulent firms compared to non-violator CEOs. Presented March 2018 at the symposium Toward a life-course criminology of corporate crime, sponsored by European Society of Criminology’s Working Groups on Organizational and Corporate Crime and on Development and Life-course Criminology, Leiden, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Schyns, Birgit and Schilling, Jan. 2013. How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 138–58.Google Scholar
Sherman, Lawrence W., Gottfredson, Denise C., MacKenzie, Doris L. et al. 1997. Preventing crime: What works, what doesn’t, what’s promising. Research in Brief. National Institute of Justice. www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/165366NCJRS.pdf.doi:10.1037/e520922006-001.Google Scholar
Simpson, , Sally, S., Galvin, Miranda A., and Layana, M. Cristina. 2018. Transitions and Turning Points: Board Diversification and Corporate Crime. Presented March 2018 at the symposium Toward a life-course criminology of corporate crime, sponsored by European Society of Criminology’s Working Groups on Organizational and Corporate Crime and on Development and Life-course Criminology, Leiden, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Simpson, Sally S., Rorie, Melissa, Alper, Mariel et al. 2014. Corporate crime deterrence: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 1105.Google Scholar
Tolan, Patrick, Henry, David, Schoeny, Michael, and Bass, Arin. 2008. Mentoring interventions to affect juvenile delinquency and associated problems. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 4, 1112.Google Scholar
van Onna, Joost H. R. 2020. From the avalanche to the game: White-collar offenders on crime, bonds and morality. Crime, Law and Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-020-09899-x.Google Scholar
Villettaz, Patrice, Killias, Martin, and Zoder, Isabel. 2006. The effects of custodial vs. non‐custodial sentences on re‐offending: A systematic review of the state of knowledge. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 2, 169.Google Scholar
Waples, Ethan P., Antes, Alison L., Murphy, Stephen T., Connelly, Shane, and Mumford, Michael D.. 2009. A meta-analytic investigation of business ethics instruction. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 133–51.Google Scholar
Weisburd, David, Telep, Cody W., Hinkle, Joshua C., and Eck, John E.. 2008. The effects of problem‐oriented policing on crime and disorder. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 4, 187.Google Scholar
Whitman, Daniel S., van Rooy, David L., and Viswesvaran, Chockalingam. 2010. Satisfaction, citizenship behaviors, and performance in work units: A meta-analysis of collective construct relations. Personnel Psychology, 63, 4181.Google Scholar
Wilson, David B., MacKenzie, Doris L., and Mitchell, Fawn Ngo. 2005. Effects of correctional boot camps on offending. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 1, 145.Google Scholar
Wilson, David B., Weisburd, David, and McClure., David 2011. Use of DNA testing in police investigative work for increasing offender identification, arrest, conviction and case clearance. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 7, 153.Google Scholar

References

American Psychological Association. 2019. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 7th ed., Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Barrett, Steven R. H., Speth, Raymond L., Eastham, Sebastian D. et al. 2015. Impact of the Volkswagen emissions control defeat device on US public health. Environmental Research Letters, 10(11).Google Scholar
Benjamin, Daniel J., Berger, James O., Johannesson, Magnus et al. 2017. Redefine statistical significance. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 610.Google Scholar
Button, Katherine S., Ioannidis, John P. A., Mokrysz, Claire et al. 2013. Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(5), 365–76.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jacob. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jacob. 1992. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–9.Google Scholar
Cohen, Mark A. 2016. The costs of white-collar crime. In van Slyke, Shanna R., Benson, Michael L., and Cullen, Francis T., eds., The Oxford Handbook of White-Collar Crime. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 7898.Google Scholar
Crutzen, Rik and Peters, Gjalt-Jorn Y.. 2017. Targeting next generations to change common practice of underpowered research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8.Google Scholar
Cumming, Geoff. 2014. The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25(1), 729.Google Scholar
Ferrarini, Alessandro. 2011. A fitter use of Monte Carlo simulations in regression models. Computational Ecology and Software, 1(4), 240–3.Google Scholar
Gentle, James E. 2017. Matrix Algebra: Theory, Computations and Applications in Statistics, 2nd ed., New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Graham, John W. 2012. Missing Data: Analysis and Design. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Grinstead, Charles M. and Snell, J. Laurie. 1997. Introduction to Probability. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
Harrell, Erika. 2019. Victims of Identity Theft, 2016. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
Hunt, Priscilla and Miles, Jeremy N. V.. 2015. An introduction to Monte Carlo simulations in criminal psychology: Applications in evaluating biased estimators for recidivism. Journal of Criminal Psychology, 5(2), 149–56.Google Scholar
Hunt, Priscilla, Anderson, James, and Saunders, Jessica. 2017. The price of justice: New national and state-level estimates of the judicial and legal costs of crime to taxpayers. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(2), 231–54.Google Scholar
Johnson, Matthew S. 2020. Regulation by shaming: Deterrence effects of publicizing violations of workplace safety and health laws. American Economic Review, 110(6), 1866–904.Google Scholar
Kano, Yutaka and Takai, Keiji. 2011. Analysis of NMAR missing data without specifying missing-data mechanisms in a linear latent variant model. Journal of Multivariate Statistics, 102(9), 1241–55.Google Scholar
Kenny, David A., Kaniskan, Burcu, and McCoach, D. Betsy. 2015. The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research, 44(3), 486507.Google Scholar
Kvarven, Amanda, Strømland, Eirik, and Johannesson, Magnus. 2020. Comparing meta-analyses and preregistered multiple-laboratory replication projects. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(4), 423–34.Google Scholar
Lakens, Daniel, Adolfi, Federico G., Albers, Casper J. et al. 2018. Justify your alpha. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 168–71.Google Scholar
Little, Roderick J. A. and Rubin, Donald B.. 2002. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Metropolis, Nicholas and Ulam, Stan. 1949. The Monte Carlo method. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 44(247), 335–41.Google Scholar
Muthén, Linda K. and Muthén, Bengt O.. 1998–2017. Mplus User’s Guide, 8th ed., Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
Muthén, Linda K. and Muthén, Bengt O.. 2002. How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(4), 599620.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Jody S., Deboeck, Pascal R., and Howard, Wayland. 2017. Attrition in developmental psychology: A review of modern missing data reporting and practices. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 41(1), 143–53.Google Scholar
Nuijten, Michèle B., van Assen, Marcel A. L. M., Coosje, L. Veldkamp, S., and Wicherts, Jelte M.. 2015. The replication paradox: Combining studies can decrease accuracy of effect size estimates. Review of General Psychology, 19(2), 172–82.Google Scholar
Open Science Collaboration. 2015. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), 943–44.Google Scholar
Peugh, James L. and Enders, Craig K.. 2004. Missing data in educational research: A review of reporting practices and suggestions for improvement. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 525–56.Google Scholar
Rice, Marnie E. and Harris, Grant T.. 2005. Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC Area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29(5), 615–20.Google Scholar
Rorie, Melissa, Alper, Mariel, Schell-Busey, Natalie, and Simpson, Sally S.. 2018. Using meta-analysis under conditions of definitional ambiguity: The case of corporate crime. Criminal Justice Studies: A Critical Journal of Crime, Law and Society, 31(1), 3861.Google Scholar
Rubin, Donald R. 1976. Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63(3), 581–92.Google Scholar
Schafer, Joseph L. and Graham, John W.. 2002. Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147–77.Google Scholar
Schell-Busey, Natalie M. 2009. The deterrent effects of ethics codes for corporate crime: A meta-analysis. PhD dissertation. ProQuest.Google Scholar
Shimshack, Jay P. and Ward, Michael B.. 2005. Regulator reputation, enforcement, and environmental compliance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 50, 519–40.Google Scholar
Sigal, Matthew J. and Chalmers, R. Philip. 2016. Play it again: Teaching statistics with Monte Carlo simulation. Journal of Statistics Education, 24(3), 136–56.Google Scholar
Simmons, Joseph P., Nelson, Leif D., and Simonsohn, Uri. 2011. False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–66.Google Scholar
Stigler, Stephen M. 1991. Stochastic simulation in the nineteenth century. Statistical Science, 6(1), 8997.Google Scholar
Strømland, Eirik. 2019. Preregistration and reproducibility. Journal of Economic Psychology, 75. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2019.01.006.Google Scholar
Sweeten, Gary. 2020. Standard errors in quantitative criminology: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 36, 263–72.Google Scholar
Szucs, Denes and Ioannidis, John P. A.. 2017. Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature. PLoS Biology, 15(3), 118.Google Scholar
Thomopoulos, Nicholas T. 2013. Essentials of Monte Carlo Simulation: Statistical Methods for Building Simulation Models. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Wasserstein, Ronald L., Schirm, Allen L., and Lazar, Nicole A.. 2019. Moving to a world beyond p < .05. The American Statistician, 73, 119.Google Scholar
West, Matthew P., Rorie, Melissa, and Cohen, Mark A.. 2020. The “pliability” of criminological analyses: Assessing bias in regression estimates using Monte Carlo simulations. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 36, 371–94.Google Scholar
Zhang, Zhiyong. 2014. Monte Carlo based statistical power analysis for mediation models: Methods and software. Behavior Research Methods, 46(4), 1184–98.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×