Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-bjz6k Total loading time: 0.954 Render date: 2022-05-19T06:29:01.311Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }


Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2018

Penelope Eckert
Stanford University, California
Get access


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Meaning and Linguistic Variation
The Third Wave in Sociolinguistics
, pp. 195 - 204
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Acton, Eric. (2014). Pragmatics and the Social Meaning of Determiners. PhD thesis, Stanford University.
Acton, Eric and Potts, Christopher. (2014). That straight talk: Sarah Palin and the sociolinguistics of demonstratives. Journal of Sociolinguistics 18:331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, Asif. (2003). The social life of a cultural value. Language and Communication 23:231–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, Asif. (2005). Voice, footing, enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15:3859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Elaine. (1990). Speaking with Style: The Sociolinguistic Skills of Children. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun. (1996). Modernity at Large. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Baby, François. (1972). La Guerre des Demoiselles en Ariège (1829–1872). Laroque d’Olmes: Montbel.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Baroni, Maria Rosa and d’Urso, Valentina. (1984). Some experimental findings about the question of politeness and women’s speech. Language in Society 13:6772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bec, Pierre. (1968). Les Interférences Linguistiques entre Gascon et Languedocien dans les Parlers du Comminges et du Couserans. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Bell, Alan. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13:145204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beltrama, Andrea. (forthcoming). Totally between discourse and subjectivity. Exploring the pragmatic side of intensification. Journal of Semantics.
Beltrama, Andrea and Staum, Laura. (2017). Totally tall sounds totally younger: Intensification at the socio-semantics interface. Journal of Sociolinguistics 21:154–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benor, Sarah Bunin. (2001). Sounding learned: Phonological variation in Orthodox Jewish English. In Sanchez, T. and Johnson, D. E. (eds.) Penn Working Papers in Linguistics: Selected Papers from the 29th Annual Conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, Department of Linguistics, 116.Google Scholar
Bereiter, Carl and Engelmann, Siegfried. (1966). Teaching Disadvantaged Children in the Preschool. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Blom, Jan-Petter and Gumperz, John. (1972). Social meaning in linguistic structure: Code-switching in Norway. In Gumperz, John and Hymes, Dell (eds.) Directions in Sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 407–34.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. (1977). The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Science Information 16(6):645–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. (1990). The Logic of Practice, tr. Richard Nice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre and Boltanski, Luc. (1975). Le fétichisme de la langue. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales 4:232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope. (1980). How and why women are more polite: Some evidence from a Mayan community. In McConnell-Ginet, Sally, Borker, Ruth A. and Furman, Nelly (eds.) Women and Language in Literature and Society. New York: Praeger, 111–36.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Levinson, Steven. (1979). Social structure, groups and interaction. In Scherer, Klaus R. and Giles, Howard (eds.) Social Markers in Speech. Cambridge University Press, 291341.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Levinson, Steven. (1987). Politeness. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brun, Auguste. (1923). Recherches Historiques sur l’Introduction du Français dans les Provinces du Midi. Paris: E. Champion.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary. (1996). Geek the girl: Language, femininity and female nerds. In Warner, Natasha, Ahlers, Jocelyn, Bilmes, Leela, Oliver, Monica, Wertheim, Suzanne and Chen, Melinda (eds.) Gender and Belief Systems. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group, 119–31.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary. (1999). You da man: Narrating the racial other in the production of white masculinity. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3:443–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary. (2001). The whiteness of nerds: Superstandard English and racial markedness. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11:84100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary. (2011). White Kids: Language, Race, and Styles of Youth Identity. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary and Hall, Kira. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7:585614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchstaller, Isa. (2006). Diagnostics of age-graded behavior: The case of the quotative system. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10:330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. (1988). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal 40:519–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. (1993). Bodies That Matter. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
California Style Collective. (1993). Personal and group style. Paper presented at the 22nd annual conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English, Ottawa.
Callary, Robert E. (1975). Phonological change and the development of an urban dialect in Illinois. Language in Society 4:155–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. (2007a). Accent, (ING) and the social logic of listener perceptions. American Speech 82:3264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. (2007b). What did you think she’d say?: Expectations and sociolinguistic perception. Paper presented at the 36th annual conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation, Philadelphia.
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn, Podesva, Robert, Roberts, Sarah and Wong, Andrew (2002). Language and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Cedergren, Henrietta. (1973). The Interplay of Social and Linguistic Factors in Panama. PhD thesis, Cornell University.
Chambers, Jack and Trudgill, Peter. (1980). Dialectology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny. (1982). Variation in an English Dialect. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chevalier, Michel. (1956). La Vie Humaine dans les Pyrénées Ariègeoises. Paris: Editions M.-Th. Genin.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Cicourel, Aaron V. and Kitsuse, John I.. (1963). The Educational Decision-Makers. New York: Bobbs Merrill.Google Scholar
Clark, Eve. (2000). First Language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clermont, Jean and Cedergren, Henrietta. (1978). Les “R” de ma mère sont perdus dans l’air. In Thibault, Pierrette (ed.) Le Français Parlé: Etudes Sociolinguistiques. Edmonton, Alberta: Linguistic Research, 1328.Google Scholar
Clyne, Michael. (2000). Lingua franca and ethnolects. Sociolinguistica 14:83–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, James S. (1961). The Adolescent Society. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S. (1966). Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Connell, Robert. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. (1985). ‘Hark, Hark, the Lark’: Social motivations for phonological style-shifting. Language and Communication 5:153–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. (2000). Language, situation and the relational self: Theorizing dialect-style in sociolinguistics. In Eckert, Penelope and Rickford, John (eds.) Stylistic Variation in Language. Cambridge University Press, 185210.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. (2007). Style: Language Variation and Identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deuchar, Margaret. (1988). A pragmatic account of women’s use of standard speech. In Coates, Jennifer and Cameron, Deborah (eds.) Women in their Speech Communities. London: Longman, 2732.Google Scholar
D’Onofrio, Annette. (2015). Persona-based information shapes linguistic perception: Valley girls and California vowels. Journal of Sociolinguistics 19(2):241–56.Google Scholar
D’Onofrio, Annette. (2016). Social Meaning in Linguistic Perception. PhD thesis, Stanford University.
Dubois, Sylvie and Horvath, Barbara. (1998a). From accent to marker in Cajun English: A study of dialect formation in progress. English World Wide 19:161–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, Sylvie and Horvath, Barbara. (1998b). Let’s tink about dat: Interdental fricatives in Cajun English. Language Variation and Change 10:245–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (1978). Bilingual strategies of assimilation in Southern France. Paper presented at conference on Ethnicity and Economic Development: East and West, University of Michigan.
Eckert, Penelope. (1980a). Diglossia: Separate and unequal. Linguistics 18:1053–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (1980b). The structure of a long-term phonological process: The back vowel chain shift in Soulatan Gascon. In Labov, William (ed.) Locating Language in Time and Space. New York: Academic Press, 179220.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (1982). Clothing and geography in a suburban school. In Kottak, Conrad P. (ed.) Researching American Culture. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 139–44.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (1983). Beyond the statistics of adolescent smoking. American Journal of Public Health 73:439–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eckert, Penelope. (1984). Age and linguistic change. In Keith, Jennie and Kertzer, David I. (eds.) Age and Anthropological Theory. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 219–33.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (1985). Grammatical constraints in phonological change: Unstressed *a in Southern France. Orbis 31:169–89.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (1986). The development of social meaning in sound change. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, New York.
Eckert, Penelope. (1987). The relative values of variables. In Denning, Keith, Inkelas, Sharon, McNair-Knox, Faye and Rickford, John (eds.) Variation in Language: Papers Presented at the Fifteenth Annual Conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation. Stanford, CA, Department of Linguistics, 101–10.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (1988). Adolescent social structure and the spread of linguistic change. Language in Society 17:183207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (1989a). Jocks and Burnouts: Social Categories and Identity in the High School. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (1989b). Social membership and linguistic variation. Paper presented at the eighteenth annual conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English, Duke University.
Eckert, Penelope. (1989c). The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation. Language Variation and Change 1:245–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (1990). Cooperative competition in adolescent “girl talk.” Discourse Processes 13:91122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (1994). Identities of Subordination as a Developmental Imperative. Working Papers on Learning and Identity, Vol. 2. Palo Alto, CA: Institute for Research on Learning.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (1996). Vowels and nailpolish: The emergence of linguistic style in the preadolescent heterosexual marketplace. In Warner, Natasha, Ahlers, Jocelyn, Bilmes, Leela, Oliver, Monica, Wertheim, Suzanne and Chen, Melinda (eds.) Gender and Belief Systems. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group, 183–90.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (2000). Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (2004). Elephants in the room. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7:392–7.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (2008a). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12:453–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (2008b). Where do ethnolects stop? International Journal of Bilingualism 12(1):2542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (2011). Where does the social stop? In Gregersen, Frans, Parrott, Jeffrey and Quist, Pia (eds.) Language Variation – European Perspectives III. Selected Papers from the Fifth International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 5). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (2012). Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41:87100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope and McConnell-Ginet, Sally. (1992). Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community–based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology 21:461–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope, Edwards, Alison and Robins, Lynne. (1985). Biological categories in linguistic variation. Paper presented at the fourteenth annual conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English, Georgetown University.
Edwards, Walter and Krakow, Cheryl. (1985). Polish-American English in Hamtramck: A sociolinguistic study. Paper presented at the fourteenth annual conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English, Georgetown University.
Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. (1956). From Generation to Generation. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. (1981). Public Man, Private Woman. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A. (1959). Diglossia. Word 15:325–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, Anne. (1989). Intonation and communicative intent in mothers’ speech to infants: Is the melody the message? Child Development 60:14971510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fishman, Joshua. (1971). Sociolinguistics. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua. (1973). Language and Nationalism. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Fónagy, Ivan. (1971). The functions of vocal style. In Chatman, Seymour (ed.) Literary Style: A Symposium. London and New York: Oxford University Press, 159–74.Google Scholar
Fought, Carmen. (1999). A majority sound change in a minority community: /u/-fronting in Chicano English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3:523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fought, Carmen. (2003). Chicano English in Context. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foulkes, Paul, Docherty, Gerard and Watt, Dominic. (2005). Phonological variation in child-directed speech. Language 81:177206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox-Genovese, Elizabeth. (1988). Within the Plantation Household. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. (1979). Language Shift: Social Determinants of Linguistic Change in Bilingual Austria. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan and Irvine, Judith T.. (1995). The boundaries of languages and disciplines: How ideologies construct difference. Social Research 62:9671001.Google Scholar
Gauchat, Louis. (1905). L’unité phonétique dans le patois d’une commune. In Festshrift Heinrich Morf. Halle: Max Niemeyer, 175232.Google Scholar
Gaudio, Rudolf P. (1997). Not talking straight in Hausa. In Hall, Kira (ed.) Queerly Phrased: Language, Gender and Sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press, 642–62.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilliéron, Jules. (1902–10). Atlas Linguistique de la France. Paris: H. Champion.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. (1981). Response cries. In Goffman, Erving Forms of Talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 78122.Google Scholar
Gold, David. (1985). Jewish English. In Fishman, Joshua A. (ed.) Readings in the Sociology of Jewish Languages. Leiden: Brill, 321.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John. (1968). The speech community. In Sills, David L. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. London: Macmillan, 381–6.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory, Horvath, Barbara, Vonwiller, Julia, Daisley, Elaine and Rogers, Inge. (1986). An intonational change in progress in Australian English. Language in Society 15:2352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haeri, Niloofar. (1989). Synchronic variation in Cairene Arabic: The case of palatalization. Paper presented at Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting, Washington DC.
Haeri, Niloofar. (1997). The Sociolinguistic Market of Cairo: Gender, Class and Education. London: Kegan Paul International.Google Scholar
Hall, Kira and O’Donovan, Veronica. (1997). Shifting gender positions among Hindi-speaking Hijras. In Freed, Alice (ed.) Language and Gender Research: Theory and Method. London: Longman, 223–66.Google Scholar
Hebdige, Dick. (1984). Subculture: The Meaning of Style. New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane. (1987). Women’s speech in modern Mexicano. In Philips, Susan U. (ed.) Language, Gender and Sex in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press, 121–60.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane. (1993). Hasta la vista, baby: Anglo Spanish in the American Southwest. Critique of Anthropology 13:145–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hindle, Donald. (1979). The Social and Situational Conditioning of Phonetic Variation. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
Hodder, Ian. (1982). The Present Past. London: BatsfordGoogle Scholar
Hollan, Douglas. (2014). From ghosts to ancestors (and back again): On the cultural and psychodynamic mediation of selfscapes. Ethos 42:175–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollingshead, A. B. (1949). Elmtown’s Youth. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Holmquist, Jonathan. (1985). Social correlates of a linguistic variable: A study in a Spanish village. Language in Society 14:191203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horvath, Barbara and Sankoff, David. (1987). Delimiting the Sydney speech community. Language in Society 16:179204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, Dell. (1972). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In Gumperz, John and Hymes, Dell (eds.) Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 3571.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith. (2001). Style as distinctiveness: The culture and ideology of linguistic differentiation. In Eckert, Penelope and Rickford, John (eds.) Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge University Press, 2143.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith and Gal, Susan. (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Kroskrity, Paul V. (ed.) Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, 3583.Google Scholar
Jaspers, Jürgen. (2008). Problematizing ethnolects: Naming linguistic practices in an Antwerp secondary school. International Journal of Bilingualism 12:85103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara, Andrus, Jennifer and Danielson, Andrew E.. (2006). Mobility, indexicality, and the enregisterment of ‘Pittsburghese’. Journal of English Linguistics 34:77104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara and Kiesling, Scott F.. (2008). Indexicality and experience: Exploring the meanings of /aw/-monophthongization in Pittsburgh. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12:533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanter, Rosabeth M. (1977). Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kiesling, Scott. (2009). Style as stance: Can stance be the primary explanation for patterns of sociolinguistic variation? In Jaffe, Alexandra (ed.) Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Stance. Oxford University Press, 171–94.Google Scholar
Knappert, Jan. (1978). The state and the languages spoken in it. Linguistics 214:6976.Google Scholar
Kulick, Don. (2000). Gay and lesbian language. In Annual Review of Anthropology. Mountain View: Annual Reviews:243–85.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1963). The social motivation of a sound change. Word 18:142.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1966). The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1971). The study of language in its social context. In Fishman, Joshua A. (ed.) Advances in the Sociology of Language, Vol. 1. The Hague: Mouton, 152216.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1972a). Hypercorrection by the lower middle class as a factor in linguistic change. In Labov, William (ed.) Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 122–42.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1972b). Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1972c). Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society 1:97120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. (1973). The linguistic consequences of being a lame. Language in Society 2:81115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. (1980). The social origins of sound change. In Labov, William (ed.) Locating Language in Time and Space. New York: Academic Press, 251–65.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1984). The intersection of sex and social factors in the course of language change. Paper presented at the thirteenth annual conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English, University of Pennsylvania.
Labov, William. (1990). The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change 2:205–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. (1994). Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (2001). Principles of Linguistic Change: Social Factors. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (2002). Review of Penelope Eckert, Linguistic variation as social practice. Language in Society 31:277–84.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Yaeger, Malcah and Steiner, Richard. (1972). A Quantitative Study of Sound Change in Progress. Philadelphia, PA: US Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Laferriere, Martha. (1979). Ethnicity in phonological variation and change. Language 55:603–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafont, Robert. (1971). Un problème de culpabilité sociologique: La diglossie franco-occitane. Langue Française 9:93100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larkin, Ralph W. (1979). Suburban Youth in Cultural Crisis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern, trans. Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lavandera, Beatriz R. (1978). Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop? Language in Society 7:171–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, Jean and Wenger, Etienne. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Page, Robert B. and Tabouret-Keller, Andrée. (1985). Acts of Identity. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald K. S. (1977). Language, Social Class and Education: A Glasgow Study. University of Edinburgh Press.Google Scholar
Martinet, André. (1952). Function, structure and sound change. Word 8:132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinet, André. (1963). Eléments de Linguistique Générale. Paris: A. ColinGoogle Scholar
Maltz, Daniel and Borker, Ruth. (1982). A cultural approach to male-female miscommunication. In Gumperz, John J. (ed.) Language and Social Identity. Cambridge University Press, 195216.Google Scholar
McConnell-Ginet, Sally. (1989). The sexual (re)production of meaning: A discourse–based theory. In Frank, Francine W. and Treichler, Paula A. (eds.) Language, Gender and Professional Writing: Theoretical Approaches and Guidelines for Nonsexist Usage. New York: MLA, 3550.Google Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, Norma. (2008). Home Girls. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Meyer, Leonard B. (1979). Toward a theory of style. In Lang, Berel (ed.) The Concept of Style. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 344.Google Scholar
Milroy, James and Milroy, Lesley. (1985). Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics. 21:339–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, Lesley. (1980). Language and Social Networks. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley. (1982). Social network and linguistic focusing. In Romaine, Suzanne (ed.) Sociolinguistic Variation in Speech Communities. London: Edward Arnold, 141–52.Google Scholar
Moonwomon, Birch. (1992). Sound Change in San Francisco English. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
Nichols, Patricia C. (1983). Linguistic options and choices for black women in the rural south. In Thorne, Barrie, Kramarae, Cheris and Henley, Nancy (eds.) Language, Gender and Society. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 5468.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor. (1991). Indexing gender. In Duranti, Alessandro and Goodwin, Charles (eds.) Rethinking Context. Cambridge University Press, 336–58.Google Scholar
Ohala, John. (1994). The biological bases of sound symbolism. In Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna and Ohala, John J. (eds.) Sound Symbolism. Cambridge University Press, 222–36.Google Scholar
Paunonen, Heikki. (1994). Language change in apparent time and in real time. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation, Stanford University.
Peirce, Charles. S. (1931). The Collected Papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols. eds. C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss and A. W. Burks. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Penfield, Joyce and Ornstein-Galicia, Jacob L.. (1985). Chicano English: An Ethnic Contact Dialect. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, Jean. (1954). The Construction of Reality in the Child. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podesva, Robert. (2004). On constructing social meaning with stop release bursts. Paper presented at Sociolinguistics Symposium 15, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Podesva, Robert. (2007). Phonation type as a stylistic variable: The use of falsetto in constructing a persona. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11:478504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podesva, Robert. (2008). Three sources of stylistic meaning. Texas Linguistic Forum 51:134–43.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert, Roberts, Sarah J. and Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. (2002). Sharing resources and indexing meanings in the production of gay styles. In Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn, Podesva, Robert J., Roberts, Sarah J. and Wong, Andrew (eds.) Language and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice. Stanford, CA: CSLI Press, 175–90.Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher. (2007). The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics 33:165–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, Mary Louise. (1988). Linguistic utopias. In MacCabe, Colin, Fabb, Nigel, Attridge, Derek and Durant, Alan (eds.) The Linguistics of Writing: Arguments Between Language and Literature. New York: Methuen, 4866.Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey K. and Scholz, Barbara C.. (2001). Language: More than words. Nature 413(6854):367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rampton, Ben. (1995). Crossing: Language and Ethnicity among Adolescents. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rauniomaa, Mirka. (2003). Stance accretion. Paper presented at the Language, Interaction, and Social Organization Research Focus Group, University of California, Santa Barbara, February.
Rich, Adrienne. (1980). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs 5:631–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickford, John. (1986a). Concord and contrast in the characterization of the speech community. Sheffield Working Papers in Language and Linguistics 3:87119.Google Scholar
Rickford, John. (1986b). The need for new approaches to class analysis in sociolinguistics. Language and Communication 6:215–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. (1984a). On the problem of syntactic varation and pragmatic meaning in sociolinguistic theory. Folia Linguistica 18:409–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. (1984b). The Language of Children and Adolescents. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rose, Mary. (2006). Language, Place and Identity in Later Life. PhD thesis, Stanford University.
Sacks, Karen. (1974). Engels revisited. In Rosaldo, Michelle and Lamphere, Louise (eds.) Women, Culture and Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 207–22.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David and Laberge, Suzanne. (1978). The linguistic market and the statistical explanation of variability. In Sankoff, David (ed.) Linguistic Variation: Models and Methods. New York: Academic Press, 239–50.Google Scholar
Sattel, Jack W. (1983). Men, inexpressiveness, and power. In Thorne, Barrie, Kramarae, Cheris and Henley, Nancy (eds.) Language, Gender and Society. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 119–24.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi and Kulick, Don. (2003). Language socialization. In Duranti, Alessandro (ed.) A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Malden, MA and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 349–68.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. (1985). Language and the culture of gender: At the intersection of structure, usage and ideology. In Mertz, Elizabeth and Parmentier, Richard J. (eds.) Semiotic Mediation. New York: Academic Press, 219–59.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication 23:193229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Edward E. and Kosslyn, Stephen M.. (2007). Cognitive Psychology: Mind and Brain. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer, Durham, Mercedes and Fortune, Liane. (2009). Universal and dialect-specific pathways of acquisition: Caregivers, children, and t/d deletion. Language Variation and Change 21:6995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur. (1964). Rebellion in a High School. Chicago, IL: Quadrangle.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali. (2005). So weird; so cool; so innovative: The use of intensifiers in the television series Friends. American Speech 80:280300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali and D'Arcy, Alex. (2004). He's like, she's like: The quotative system in Canadian youth. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8:493514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibault, Pierrette. (1983). Equivalence et grammaticalisation. PhD thesis, Université de Montréal.
Thorne, Barrie. (1993). Gender Play. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. (1972). Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society 1:179–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. (1974a). Linguistic change and diffusion: Description and explanation in sociolinguistic dialect geography. Language in Society 3:215–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. (1974b). The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein. (1931). The Theory of the Leisure Class. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Walters, Keith. (2003). Gender, nationalism and language ideology: The Tunisian case. Paper presented at Conference on Language, Identity and Change in the Modern Arab World: Implications for the study of language and culture, Berkeley, CA: University of California.
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William and Herzog, Marvin. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehmann, Winfred and Malkiel, Yakov (eds.) Directions for Historical Linguistics. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 95188.Google Scholar
Wenger, Etienne. (2000). Communities of Practice. Cambridge Univesrity Press.Google Scholar
Wexler, Paul. (1971). Diglossia, language standardization and purism. Lingua 27: 330–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. (1969). A Sociolinguistic Description of Detroit Negro Speech. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wong, Andrew. (2005). The re-appropriation of Tongzhi. Language in Society 34:763–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Qing. (2001). Changing Economics, Changing Markets: A Sociolinguistic Study of Chinese Yuppies. PhD thesis, Stanford University.
Zhang, Qing. (2005). A Chinese yuppie in Beijing: Phonological variation and the construction of a new professional identity. Language in Society 34:431–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Qing. (2008). Rhotacization and the “Beijing Smooth Operator”: The social meaning of a linguistic variable. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12:201–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Penelope Eckert, Stanford University, California
  • Book: Meaning and Linguistic Variation
  • Online publication: 26 June 2018
  • Chapter DOI:
Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Penelope Eckert, Stanford University, California
  • Book: Meaning and Linguistic Variation
  • Online publication: 26 June 2018
  • Chapter DOI:
Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Penelope Eckert, Stanford University, California
  • Book: Meaning and Linguistic Variation
  • Online publication: 26 June 2018
  • Chapter DOI:
Available formats