Aboody, D. & Kasznik, R. (1998), ‘CEO stock options and corporate voluntary disclosures’, Stanford Graduate School of Business Research Paper Series, No. 1535, November.

Abosch, K. (1995), ‘The promise of broadbanding’, Compensation and Benefits Review, January–February: 54–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abosch, K. (1998a), ‘Confronting six myths of broadbanding’, WorldatWork Journal, 7 (3): 28–36.Google Scholar

Abosch, K. (1998b), ‘Variable pay: Do we have the basics in place?’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 30(4): 12–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abosch, K. & Hand, J. (1994a), Broadbanding Design, Approaches and Practices, American Compensation Association, Scottsdale, AZ.Google Scholar

Abosch, K. & Hand, J. (1994b), ‘Characteristics and practices of organizations with broadbanding: A study of alternative approaches’, WorldatWork Journal, 3(3): 6–17.Google Scholar

Abosch, K. & Hand, J. (1998), Life with Broadbands, American Compensation Association, Scottsdale, AZ.Google Scholar

Abosch, K. & Hmurovic, B. (1998), ‘A traveler's guide to global broadbanding’, WorldatWork Journal, 7(2): 38–47.Google Scholar

ABS (2004), ABS Cat. 6310.0, Employee Earnings, Benefits and Trade Union Membership – Australia, Australian Bureau of Statistics, August.

Ackroyd, S. & Thompson, P. (1999), Organizational Misbehaviour, Sage, London.Google Scholar

Adams, J. S. (1963), ‘Towards an understanding of inequity’, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67: 422–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, J. S. (1965), ‘Inequity in social exchange’, in Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Press, New York, vol. 2, pp. 267–99.Google Scholar

Aggrawal, R., & Samwick, A. A. (1999), ‘The other side of the tradeoff: The impact of risk on executive compensation’, Journal of Political Economy, 107(1): 65–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aitken, M. & Wood, R. (1989), ‘Employee stock ownership plans: Issues and evidence’, Journal of Industrial Relations, 31(2): 147–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alderfer, C. P. (1972), Existence, Relatedness, and Growth, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar

Altmansberger, H. & Wallace, M. (1995), ‘Strategic use of goalsharing at Corning: Taking incentives beyond gainsharing’, WorldatWork Journal, 4 (4): 64–73.Google Scholar

Ambrose, M. L. & Arnaud, A. (2005), ‘Are procedural justice and distributive justice conceptually distinct?’, in Greenberg, J. & Colquitt, J. A. (eds), Handbook of Organizational Justice, Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 59–84.Google Scholar

American Compensation Association Competencies Research Team (1996), ‘The role of competencies in an integrated HR strategy’, WorldatWork Journal, 5(2): 6–21.

Anderson, N. & Schalk, R. (1998), ‘The psychological contract in retrospect and prospect’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(Special issue): 637–47.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andon, P., Baxter, J. & Mahana, H. (2005), ‘The balanced scorecard: Slogans, seduction and state of play’, Australian Accounting Review, 15(1): 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antonioni, D. (1994), ‘The effects of feedback accountability on upward appraisal ratings’, Personnel Psychology, 47: 349–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antonioni, D. (1996), ‘Designing an effective 360 degree appraisal feedback process’, Organizational Dynamics, 24(3): 24–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Applebaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P. & Kallenberg, A. (2000), Manufacturing Competitive Advantage: The Effects of High Performance Work Systems on Plant Performance and Company Outcomes, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Applebaum, E. & Batt, R. (1994), The New American Workplace, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Applebaum, S. H. & Kamal, R. (2000), ‘An analysis of the utilization and effectiveness of non-financial incentives in small business’, Journal of Management Development, 19(9): 733–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Argyris, C. (1960), Understanding Organizational Behaviour, Dorsey Press, Homewood, IL.Google Scholar

Armitage, K. (1997), ‘The wages of fear’, British Journal of Administrative Management, May–June: 25.Google Scholar

Armstrong, M. (1996), Employee Reward, Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, London.Google Scholar

Armstrong, M. (2000), Performance Management, 2nd edn, Kogan Page, London.Google Scholar

Armstrong, M. & Baron, A. (1998), Performance Management: The New Realities, Chartered Institute for Personnel and Development, London.Google Scholar

Armstrong, M. & Brown, D. (1998), ‘Relating competencies to pay: The UK experience’, Compensation and Benefits Review, May–June, 28–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armstrong, M. & Brown, D. (2005), ‘Reward strategies and trends in the United Kingdom: The land of diverse and pragmatic dreams’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 37(4): 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armstrong, M. & Brown, D. (2006), Strategic Reward: Making It Happen, Kogan Page, London.Google Scholar

Armstrong, M. & Murlis, H. (1994), Reward Management: A Handbook of Remuneration Strategy and Practice, 3rd edn, Kogan Page, London.Google Scholar

Armstrong, M. & Murlis, H. (1998), Reward Management: A Handbook of Remuneration Strategy and Practice, 4th edn, Kogan Page, London.Google Scholar

Armstrong, M. & Murlis, H. (2004), Reward Management: A Handbook of Remuneration Strategy and Practice, 5th edn, Kogan Page, London.Google Scholar

Arthur, J. B. (1992), ‘The link between business strategy and industrial relations systems in American steel minimills’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45(3): 488–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arthur, J. B. (1994), ‘Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover’, Academy of Management Journal, 37(3): 670–87.Google Scholar

Arthur, J. B. & Jelf, G. S. (1999), ‘The effects of gainsharing on grievance rates and absenteeism over time’, Journal of Labor Research, 20: 133–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arthur, J. B. & Kim, D.-O. (2005), ‘Gainsharing and knowledge-sharing: The effects of labour-management co-operation’, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(9): 1564–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arthurs, A. (1996), ‘Job evaluation’, in Warner, M. (ed.), International Encyclopaedia of Business and Management, Routledge, London, vol. 3, pp. 2430–8.Google Scholar

Ashton, C. (1996), ‘How competencies boost performance’, Management Development Review, 9(3): 14–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Atkinson, A. A., Waterhouse, J. H. & Well, R. B. (1997), ‘A stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement’, Sloan Management Review, Spring: 25–37.Google Scholar

Atwater, L. E. (1998), ‘The advantages and pitfalls of self-assessment in organizations’, in Smither, J. W. (ed.), Performance Appraisal: State of the Art in Practice, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 331–69.Google Scholar

Audia, P. G. & Locke, E. A. (2003), ‘Benefiting from negative feedback’, Human Resource Management Review, 13: 631–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Australian Public Service Commission (2005), State of the Service Report 2004–05, Australian Public Service Commission, Canberra.

Australian Stock Exchange (2005), Australia's Share Owners: An ASX Study of Share Investors in 2004, ASX, Sydney.

Australian Stock Exchange Corporate Governance Council (2003), Principles of Good Corporate Governance and Best Practice Recommendations, ASX, Sydney.

Bacal, R. (1998), Performance Management, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar

Bach, S. (1999), ‘From performance appraisal to performance management’, in Bach, S. & Sisson, K. (eds), Personnel Management: A Comprehensive Guide to Theory and Practice, 3rd edn, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 111–36.Google Scholar

Bacharach, S. B. & Bamberger, P. (1995), ‘Beyond situational constraints: Job resource inadequacy and individual performance at work’, Human Resource Management Review, 5(2): 79–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baird, M. (2006), ‘The gender agenda: Women, work and maternity leave’, in Hearn, M. & Michelson, G. (eds), Rethinking Work: Time, Space, Discourse, Cambridge University Press, Melbourne, pp. 39–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, R. (1997), ‘A slice of the action’, Weekend Australian, 18–19 October: 35.Google Scholar

Balkin, D. B. & Montemayor, E. F. (2000), ‘Explaining team-based pay: A contingency perspective based on the organizational life cycle, team design, and organisational learning literatures’, Human Resource Management Review, 10(3): 249–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bandura, A. (1986), Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar

Barber, A., Dunham, R. & Formisano, R. (1992), ‘The impact of flexible benefits on employee satisfaction: A field study’, Personnel Psychology, 45: 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barkema, H. & Mejia, L. R. 1998, ‘Managerial compensation and firm performance: A general research framework’, Academy of Management Journal, 42(2): 131–46.Google Scholar

Barnes, A., Josev, T., Lenne, J., Marshall, S., Mitchell, R., Ramsay, I. & Rider, C. (2006), ‘Employee share ownership schemes: Two case studies’, Research Report, Centre for Corporate Law and Securities Regulation & Centre for Employment and Labour Relations Law, University of Melbourne, Melbourne.Google Scholar

Barney, J. B. (1991) ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage’, Journal of Management, 17: 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barney, J. B. (1995), ‘Looking inside for competitive advantage’, Academy of Management Executive, 9(4): 49–61.Google Scholar

Barney, J. B. & Wright, P. M (1998), ‘On becoming a strategic partner: The role of human resources in gaining competitive advantage’, Human Resource Management, 37(1): 31–46.3.0.CO;2-W>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrick, M. R. & Mount, M. K. (1991), ‘The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis’, Personnel Psychology, 44: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartol, K. M. & Locke, E. A. (2000), ‘Incentives and motivation’, in Rynes, S. L. & Gerhart, B. (eds), Compensation in Organizations: Current Research and Practice, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 104–50.Google Scholar

Bassett, G. (1994), ‘Merit pay increases are a mistake’, & Gilbert, D. (1994), ‘Response’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 26(2): 20–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bateman, T. S. & Organ, D. W. (1983), ‘Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee “citizenship” ’, Academy of Management Journal, 26: 587–95.Google Scholar

Bebchuk, L. & Fried, J. (2004), Pay Without Performance: The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive Compensation, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Bebchuk, L. & Fried, J. (2005a), ‘Executive compensation at Fannie Mae: A case study of perverse incentives, nonperformance pay, and camouflage’, Journal of Corporation Law, 30(4): 807–22.Google Scholar

Bebchuk, L. & Fried, J. (2005b), ‘Pay without performance: Overview of the issues’, Journal of Corporation Law, 30(4): 647–74.Google Scholar

Bebchuk, L. & Fried, J. (2006), ‘Pay without performance: Overview of the issues’, Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(1): 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bebchuk, L., Fried, J. & Walker, D. (2002), ‘Managerial power and executive compensation’, University of Chicago Law Review, 69: 751–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bebchuk, L. & Jackson, R. (2005), ‘Executive pensions’, Journal of Corporation Law, 30(4): 823–55.Google Scholar

Becker, B. & Gerhart, B. (1996), ‘The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: Progress and prospects’, Academy of Management Journal, 39(4): 779–801.Google Scholar

Becker, B. E. & Huselid, M. A. (1998), ‘High performance work systems and firm performance: A synthesis of research and managerial implications’, in Ferris, G. (ed.), Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, vol. 16, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 53–101.Google Scholar

Becker, B. E., Huselid, M., Pickus, P. & Spratt, M. (1997), ‘HR as a source of shareholder value: Research and recommendations’, Human Resource Management, 36(1): 39–47.3.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bedaux, C. E. (1921), ‘The Bedaux-Unit principle of industrial management’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 5: 119–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beer, M. (1981), ‘Performance appraisal: Dilemmas and possibilities’, Organizational Dynamics, 9(3): 24–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beer, M. & Cannon, M. D. (2004), ‘Promise and peril in implementing pay-for-performance’, Human Resource Management, 43(1): 3–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beer, M. & Katz, N. (2003), ‘Do incentives work? The perceptions of a worldwide sample of senior executives’, Human Resource Planning, 26(3): 30–44.Google Scholar

Beer, M., Spector, B., Lawrence, P., Mills, D. & Walton, R. (1984), Managing Human Assets: The Ground Breaking Harvard Business School Program, Free Press, NY.Google Scholar

Behrend, H. (1957), ‘The effort bargain’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 10: 503–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Behrend, H. (1961), ‘A fair day's work’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 8: 102–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belcher, J. (1995), ‘Group incentives: Improving performance through shared goals and rewards’ in Risher, H. & Fay, C. (eds), The Performance Imperative: Strategies for Enhancing Workforce Effectiveness, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 343–60.Google Scholar

Ner, A. & Jones, D. (1995), ‘Employee Participation, ownership, and productivity: A theoretical framework’, Industrial Relations, 34(4): 532–54.Google Scholar

Bennett Stewart, G. et al. (1993), ‘Rethinking rewards’, Harvard Business Review, 71(6): 37–49.Google Scholar

Bergel, G. (1994), ‘Choosing the right pay system to fit banding’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 26(4): 34–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berglas, S. (2002), ‘The very real dangers of executive coaching’, Harvard Business Review, 80(6) 86–93.Google Scholar

Berle, A. A. & Means, G. C. (1932), The Modern Corporation and Private Property, Commerce Clearing House, New York.Google Scholar

Bernardin, H. J. (1986), ‘Subordinate appraisal: A valuable source of information about managers’, Human Resource Management, 25: 421–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bettenhausen, K. L. & Fedor, D. B. (1997), ‘Peer and upward appraisals: A comparison of their benefits and problems’, Group and Organization Management, 22(2): 236–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beugre, C. (1998), Managing Fairness in Organizations, Quorum Books, Westport, CT.Google Scholar

Bies, R. J. (2005), ‘Are procedural justice and interactional justice conceptually distinct?’, in Greenberg, J. & Colquitt, J. A. (eds), Handbook of Organizational Justice, Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 85–112.Google Scholar

Bies, R. J. & Mogg, J. S. (1986), ‘Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness’, in Lewicki, R., Sheppard, B. & Bazerman, M. (eds), Research on Negotiations in Organizations, vol. 1, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 43–55.Google Scholar

Blake Dawson Waldron Lawyers (2004), The BDW Guide to CLERP 9, Blake Dawson Waldron Lawyers, Sydney, www.bdw.com.au/publications/clerp9/clerp9guide.pdf.

Blasi, J., Conte, M. & Kruse, D. (1996), ‘Employee stock ownership and corporate performance among public companies’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 50(1): 60–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blinder, A. S. (ed.) (1990), Paying for Productivity: A Look at the Evidence, Brookings Institution, Washington DC.Google Scholar

Bloom, M. & Milkovich, G. T. (1998), ‘Relationships among risk, incentive pay, and organisational performance’, Academy of Management Journal, 41(3): 283–97.Google Scholar

Bodie, Z., Kaplan, R. S. & Merton, R. C. (2003), ‘For the last time: Stock options are an expense’, Harvard Business Review, 81(3): 63–71.Google Scholar

Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993), ‘Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance’, in , Schmitt N. & Borman, W. C. (eds), Personnel Selecton in Organizations, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 71–98.Google Scholar

Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997), ‘Organizational citizenship behavior and contextual performance’, Human Performance, 10(2): 67–70.Google Scholar

Boudreau, J. W. & Berman, R. (1991), ‘Using performance measurement to evaluate strategic human resource management decisions: Kodak's experience with profit sharing’, Human Resource Management, 30(3): 393–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowers, J. (2003), ‘Valuing work: An integrated approach’, WorldatWork Journal, 12(2): 28–39.Google Scholar

Boxall, P. & Purcell, J. (2003), ‘Strategic HRM: “Best fit” or “best practice”?’, in Boxall, P. & Purcell, J., Strategy and Human Resource Management, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 47–70.Google Scholar

Boyatzis, R. (1982), The Competent Manager: A Model for Effective Performance, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar

Ilan, Y. & Shultz, T. (2005), ‘Perceived fairness of the mystery customer method: Comparing two employee evaluation practices’, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 17(4): 231–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bretz, R. D., Milkovich, G. T. & Read, W. (1992), ‘The current state of performance appraisal research and practice’, Journal of Management, 18: 321–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks, S. (1994), ‘Noncash ways to compensate employees’, HR Magazine, April, 38–43.Google Scholar

Brough, I. (1994), ‘PRP for manual workers: Issues and experience’, Employee Relations, 16(7): 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, D. (1996), ‘Broadbanding: A study of company practices in the United Kingdom’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 28(6): 41–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, D. & Armstrong, M. (1999), Paying for Contribution: Real Performance-Related Pay Strategies, Kogan Page, London.Google Scholar

Brown, K. 2005, ‘Putting the life back into work’, Human Resources Magazine, 13 July, n.p.Google Scholar

Brown, M. & Heywood, J. (eds) (2002), Paying for Performance: An International Comparison, M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY.Google Scholar

Buck, T., Brice, A., Main, G. & Udueni, H. (2003), ‘Long term incentive plans, executive pay and UK company performance’, Journal of Management Studies, 40(7): 1709–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Budman, M. (1997), ‘Is there merit in merit pay?’, Across the Board, 34, June: 33–6.Google Scholar

Budman, M. (1998), ‘Mixed results’, Across the Board, 35(6), June: 23–8.Google Scholar

Bullock, R. & Lawler, E. E. (1984), ‘Gainsharing, a few questions and fewer answers’, Human Resource Management, 23(1): 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burns, T. & Stalker, G. M. (1961), The Management of Innovation, Tavistock Publications, London.Google Scholar

Business Council of Australia (2004), CEO Turnover 2003, BCA, Melbourne.

Byrne, J. A. & Bongiorno, L. (1997), ‘How ordinary workers feel when fat cats get the cream’, Management Development Review, 10(4/5): 164–5.Google Scholar

Callus, R. (2005), ‘ANZ’, in Callus, R. (ed), Performance Management: HiP HR in Practice, ACIRRT, University of Sydney, Sydney, pp. 19–22.Google Scholar

Cameron, J. & Pierce, D. (1997), ‘Rewards, interest and performance: An evaluation of experimental findings’, WorldatWork Journal, 6(4): 6–15.Google Scholar

Carson, K., Cardy, R. & Dobbins, G. (1991), ‘Performance appraisal as effective management or deadly management disease: Two empirical investigations’, Group and Organisational Studies, 16(2): 143–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chandler, S. (1996), ‘United we own’, Business Week, 3467, 18 March: 40–4.Google Scholar

Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (2005a), Annual Survey Report 2005: Performance Management, CIPD, London.

Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (2005b), Annual Survey Report 2005: Reward Management, CIPD, London.

Chen, C., Steiner, T. & Whyte, A. (2006), ‘Does stock option-based executive compensation induce risk-taking? An analysis of the banking industry’, Journal of Banking and Finance, 30: 915–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cherrington, D. J. (1991), ‘Need theories of motivation’, in Steers, R. M. & Porter, L. W. (eds), Motivation and Work Behavior, 5th edn, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 31–43.Google Scholar

Chilton, K. W. (1993), ‘Lincoln Electric's incentive system: Can it be transferred overseas?’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 25(6): 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chilton, K. W. (1994), ‘Lincoln Electric's incentive system: A reservoir of trust’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 26(6): 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Church, R. A. (1971), ‘Profit-sharing and labour relations in England in the nineteenth century’, International Review of Social History, 16(1): 2–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cin, B., Han, T. & Smith, S. C. (2003) ‘A tale of two tigers: Employee financial participation in Korea and Taiwan’, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(6): 920–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cira, D. J. & Benjamin, E. R. (1998), ‘Competency-based pay: A concept in evolution’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 30(5): 21–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, R. (1992), Australian Human Resources Management: Framework and Practice, 2nd edn, McGraw-Hill, Sydney.Google Scholar

Cole, G. D. H. (1918), The Payment of Wages: A Study in Payment by Results Under the Wage-System, Fabian Research Department and George Allen & Unwin, London.Google Scholar

Coleman, V. & Borman, W., ‘Investigating the underlying structure of the citizenship performance domain’, Human Resource Management Review, 10(1): 25–44.CrossRef

Collins, D. (1996), ‘15 lessons learned from the death of a gainsharing plan’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 28(2): 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, D., Hatcher, L. & Ross, T. (1993), ‘The decision to implement gainsharing: The role of work climate, expected outcomes, and union status’, Personnel Psychology, 46: 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colquitt, J. A., Greenberg, J. & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2005), ‘What is organizational justice? A historical overview’, in Colquitt, J. A. & Greenberg, J. (eds), Handbook of Organizational Justice, Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 3–56.Google Scholar

Contu, A. & Willmott, H. (2005), ‘You spin me round: The realist turn in organization and management studies’, Journal of Management Studies, 42(8): 1645–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conway, N. & Briner, R. B. (2005), Understanding Psychological Contracts at Work: A Critical Evaluation of Theory and Research, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conyon, M. (2006), ‘Executive compensation and incentives’, Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(1): 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conyon, M. & Sadler, G. (2001), ‘Executive pay, tournaments and corporate performance in UK firms’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(2): 141–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cook, F. (1994), ‘Compensation surveys are biased’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 26(5): 19–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooke, W. N. (1994), ‘Employee participation programs, group-based incentives and company performance: A union–nonunion comparison’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 47: 594–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, C., Dyck, B. & Frohlich, N. (1992), ‘Improving the effectiveness of gainsharing: The role of fairness and participation’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(3): 471–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Costello, C. (1996), ‘ESOPs: No fable’, Australian Accountant, 66(4): 70–2.Google Scholar

Cowherd, D. M. & Levine, D. I. (1992), ‘Product quality and pay equity between lower-level employees and top management: An investigation of distributive justice theory’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 302–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapiro, J. (2002), ‘A psychological contract perspective on organizational citizenship behavior’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(8): 927–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Creelman, J. (1995), ‘Pay and performance drive human resource agendas’, Management Development Review, 8(3): 6–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cropanzano, R. & Folger, R. (1991), ‘Procedural justice and worker motivation’, in Steers, R. M. & Porter, L. W. (eds), Motivation and Work Behavior, 5th edn, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 131–43.Google Scholar

Cropanzano, R. & Prehar, C. (2001), ‘Emerging justice concerns in an era of changing psychological contracts’, in Cropanzano, R. (ed.), Justice in the Workplace: From Theory to Practice, 2nd edn, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 245–70.Google Scholar

Crotty, M. (1998), The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.Google Scholar

Crystal, G. (1988), ‘The wacky, wacky world of CEO pay’, Fortune, 6 June: 34–40.Google Scholar

Crystal, G. (1991a), In Search of Excess: The Overcompensation of American Executives, Norton.Google Scholar

Crystal, G. (1991b), ‘Why CEO compensation is so high’, California Management Review, 34: 9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cullinane, N. & Dundon, T. (2006), ‘The psychological contract: A critical review’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(2): 113–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cumming, C. (1994), ‘Incentives that really do motivate’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 26(3), 38–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cutcher-Gerchenfeld, J. (1991), ‘The impact on economic performance of a transformation in labor relations’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 44: 241–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dalton, G. (1998), ‘The glass wall: Shattering the myth that alternative rewards won't work with unions’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 30(6): 38–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, J. H. (1995), ‘Why rewards undermine performance: An exclusive interview with Alfie Kohn’, WorldatWork Journal, 4(2): 6–19.Google Scholar

Deci, E. L. (1992), ‘The effects of contingent and non-contingent rewards and controls on intrinsic motivation’, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 8: 217–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deci, E. L., Koestner, R. & Ryan, R. M. (1999), ‘A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation’, Psychological Bulletin, 125(6): 627–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985), Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior, Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deckop, J. R., Mangel, R. & Cirka, C. C. (1999), ‘Getting more than you pay for: organizational citizenship behavior and pay-for-performance plans’, Academy of Management Journal, 42(4): 420–9.Google Scholar

Deery, S., Iverson, R. D. & Walsh, J. (2006), ‘Toward a better understanding of psychological contract breach: A study of customer service employees’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1): 166–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delery, J. E. (1998), ‘Issues of fit in strategic human resource management: Implications for research’, Human Resource Management Review, 8: 289–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delery, J. E. & Doty, H. (1996), ‘Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions’, Academy of Management Journal, 39(4): 802–35.Google Scholar

Deming, W. E. (1986), Out of the Crisis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Centre for Advanced Engineering, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

DeNisi, A. S. & Peters, L. H. (1996), ‘Organization of information in memory and the performance appraisal process: Evidence from the field’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6): 717–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeNisi, A. S. & Williams, K. J. (1988), ‘Cognitive research in performance appraisal’, in Rowland, K. & Ferris, G. S. (eds), Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, vol. 6, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 109–56.Google Scholar

Dessler, G., Griffiths, J. & Lloyd-Walker, B. (2004), Human Resource Management, 2nd edn, Prentice Hall, Sydney.Google Scholar

Devanna, M. A., Fombrun, C. & Tichy, N. (1981), ‘Human resource management: A strategic perspective’, Organizational Dynamics, 9(3): 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dewey, B. (1994), ‘Changing to skill-based pay: Disarming the transition landmines’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 26(1): 38–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickinson, T. L. & Zellinger, P. M. (1980), ‘A comparison of the behaviorally anchored rating and mixed standard scale formats’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 65: 147–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dobbins, G., Cardy, R., Facteau, J. & Miller, J. (1993), ‘Implications of situational constraints on performance evaluation and performance management’, Human Resource Management Review, 3(2): 105–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dolmat-Connell, J. (1999a), ‘Changing measures for changing times’, in Berger, L. A. & Berger, D. R. (eds), The Compensation Handbook: A State-of-the-Art Guide to Compensation Strategy and Design, 4th edn, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 467–80.Google Scholar

Dolmat-Connell, J. (1999b), ‘Developing a reward strategy that delivers shareholder and employee value’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 31(2): 46–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dornstein, M. (1991), Conceptions of Fair Pay: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Research, Praeger, New York.Google Scholar

Dowling, B. & Richardson, R. (1997), ‘Evaluating performance-related pay for managers in the National Health Service’, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 8(3): 348–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drago, R. & Heywood, J. S. (1995), ‘The choice of payment schemes: Australian establishment data’, Industrial Relations, 34(4): 507–31.Google Scholar

Drenth, P. J. D. (1998), ‘Personnel appraisal’, in Drenth, P. J. D., Thierry, H. & Wolff, C. J. (eds), Handbook of Work and Organizational Psychology, vol. 2, ‘Personnel Psychology’, Psychology Press, Hove, East Sussex, pp. 59–87.Google Scholar

Dubois, D. D. & Rothwell, W. J. (2004), Competency-based Human Resource Management, Davies-Black Publishing, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar

Dunphy, D. & Hackman, B. K. (1988), ‘Performance appraisal as a strategic intervention’, Human Resource Management Australia, 26(2): 23–34.Google Scholar

Edwards, M. & Ewen, A. (1996a), Providing 360-Degree Feedback: An Approach to Enhancing Individual and Organizational Performance, American Compensation Association, Scottsdale, AZ.Google Scholar

Edwards, M. & Ewen, A. (1996b), ‘How to manage performance and pay with 360-degree feedback’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 28(3): 41–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Egan, J. (2004), ‘Equity incentive plans’, unpublished lecture presentation on behalf of Egan Associates, University of Sydney, May 2004.

Ehrich, L. C. & Hansford, B. (1999), ‘Mentoring: Pros and cons for HRM’, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 37(3): 92–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989), ‘Agency theory: An assessment and review’, Academy of Management Review, 14(1): 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellig, B. R. (2002), The Complete Guide to Executive Compensation, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar

Emerson, S. M. (1991), ‘Job evaluation: A barrier to excellence?’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 23(1): 38–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

England, P. & Kilbourne, B. (1991), ‘Using job evaluation to achieve pay equity’, International Journal of Public Administration, 14(5): 823–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Enos, M. & Limoges, G. (2000), ‘Broadbanding: Is that your company's final answer?’, WorldatWork, 9(3): 61–8.Google Scholar

EOWA (2006), Equal Opportunity for Women in the Workplace Survey 2005: Paid Parental Leave, Equal Opportunity for Women in the Workplace Agency, Australian Government, Canberra.

Erdogan, B. (2002), ‘Antecedents and consequences of justice perceptions in performance appraisals’, Human Resource Management Review, 12(4): 555–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, E.. (1995), ‘A series of essays about how rewards can succeed’, WorldatWork Journal, 4(2): 20–35.Google Scholar

Fakhfakh, F. & Perotin, V. (2002), ‘France: Weitzman under state paternalism’, in Brown, M. & Heywood, J. (eds), Paying for Performance. An International Comparison, M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY, pp. 90–114.Google Scholar

Fein, M. (1999), ‘Improshare: Sharing productivity gains with employees’, in Berger, L. A. & Berger, D. R., The Compensation Handbook: A State-of-the-Art Guide to Compensation Strategy and Design, 4th edn, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 158–75.Google Scholar

Fenwick, M. & Cieri, H. (1995), ‘Building an integrated approach to performance management using critical incident technique’, Asia-Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 33(3): 76–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finkelstein, S. (1992), ‘Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation’, Academy of Management Journal, 35: 505–38.Google Scholar

Finkelstein, S. & Hambrick, D. (1989), ‘Chief executive compensation: A study of the intersection of markets and political processes’, Strategic Management Journal, 10: 121–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

enz, J. (2000), The ROI of Human Capital: Measuring the Economic Value of Employee Performance, AMACOM, New York.Google Scholar

Flanagan, J. C. (1954), ‘The critical incident technique’, Psychological Bulletin, 51: 327–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flannery, T., Hofrichter, D. & Platten, P. (1996), People, Performance and Pay, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar

Folger, R. & Bies, R. J. (1989), ‘Managerial responsibilities and procedural justice’, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2: 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Folger, R. & Cropanzano, R. (1998), Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar

Folger, R. & Konovsky, M. A. (1989), ‘Effects of procedural and distributive justice in reactions to pay raise decisions’, Academy of Management Journal, 32: 115–30.Google Scholar

Folger, R., Konovsky, M. A. & Cropanzano, R. (1992), ‘A due process metaphor for performance appraisal’, in Cummings, L. L. & Staw, B. (eds), Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 14, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 129–77.Google Scholar

Fombrun, C., Tichy, N. & Devanna, M. (1984), Strategic Human Resource Management, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar

Forkosch, M. D. (1958), ‘American democracy and procedural due process’, Brooklyn Law Review, 24: 173–253.Google Scholar

Fox, A. (1974), Beyond Contract, Faber & Faber, London.Google Scholar

Fox, S., Nahum, Z. & Yinon, Y. (1989), ‘Perceived similarity and accuracy of peer ratings’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 73: 239–44.Google Scholar

Freeman, J. (1996), ‘Rewarding workers: Why it pays to nurture staff’, The Australian, 14 September.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. B., Kleiner, M., & Ostroff, C. (2000, The Anatomy of Employee Involvement and Its Effects on Firms and Workers, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuehrer, V. (1994), ‘Total reward strategy: A prescription for organizational survival’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 26(1): 44–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaertner, K. N. & Gaertner, G. H. (1985), ‘Performance-contingent pay for federal managers’, Administration and Society, 17 (May), 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gantt, H. L. (1913), Work, Wages and Profits, Engineering Magazine Co.Google Scholar

Garavan, T. N., Morley, M. & Flynn, M. (1997), ‘360 degree feedback: Its role in employee development’, Journal of Management Development, 16(2): 134–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerhart, B. (2000), ‘Compensation strategy and organizational performance’, in Rynes, S. L. & Gerhart, B. (eds), Compensation in Organizations: Current Research and Practice, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 151–94.Google Scholar

Gerhart, B. & Milkovich, G. (1990), ‘Organizational differences in managerial compensation and financial performance’, Academy of Management Journal, 33: 663–90.Google Scholar

Gerhart, B. & Milkovich, G. (1992), ‘Employee compensation: Research and practice’, in Dunnette, M. D. & Hough, L. M. (eds), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, vol. 3, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA, pp. 1009–55.Google Scholar

Gerhart, B. & Rynes, S. (2003), Compensation: Theory, Evidence, and Strategic Implications, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar

Gilbert, D. (1994), ‘Broadbands and winning in today's marketplace’, WorldatWork Journal, 3(1): 48–50.Google Scholar

Gilbert, D. & Abosch, K. (1996), Improving Organizational Effectiveness Through Broadbanding, American Compensation Association, Scottsdale, AZ.Google Scholar

Gilliland, S. W. & Langdon, J. C. (1998), ‘Creating performance management systems that promote perceptions of fairness’, in Smither, J. W. (ed.), Performance Appraisal: State of the Art in Practice, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 209–43.Google Scholar

Golden, H. J. (2004), ‘Corporate governance issues affecting executive compensation’, in Chingos, P. T. (ed.), Responsible Executive Compensation for a New Era of Accountability, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, pp. 76–96.Google Scholar

Goleman, D. (1995), Emotional Intelligence, Bantam Books, New York.Google Scholar

Mejia, L. & Wiseman, R. M. (1997), ‘Reframing executive compensation: An assessment and outlook’, Journal of Management, 23: 291–374.Google Scholar

Gordon, J. N. (2005), ‘Executive compensation: If there's a problem, what's the remedy? The case for compensation discussion and analysis’, Journal of Corporation Law, 30(4): 675–702.Google Scholar

Grant, D., O'Donnell, M. & Shields, J. (2003), ‘The new performance management paradigm in the Australian Public Service: Discourse, practice, impact’, in Duvillier, T., Genard, J.-L & Priaux, A. (ed.), La Motivation au Travail dans les Services Publics, L'Marmattan, Paris, pp. 247–59.Google Scholar

Grant, D. & Shields, J. (2006), ‘Identifying the subject: Worker identity as discursively contested terrain’, in Hearn, M. & Michelson, G. (eds), Rethinking Work: Time, Space and Discourse, Cambridge University Press, Melbourne, pp. 285–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenberg, J. (1986), ‘Organizational performance appraisal procedures: What makes them fair?’, in Lewicki, R. J., Sheppard, B. H. & Bazerman, M. H. (eds), Research on Negotiation in Organizations, vol. 1, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 25–41.Google Scholar

Greenberg, J. (1987), ‘Using diaries to promote procedural justice in performance appraisals’, Social Justice Research, 1(2): 219–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenberg, J. (1990), ‘Organizational justice: Yesterday, today and tomorrow’, Journal of Management, 16(2): 399–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenberg, J. (1993), ‘Justice and organizational citizenship: A commentary on the state of the science’, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 6(3): 222–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenberg, J. (1995), The Quest for Justice on the Job: Essays and Experiments, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar

Greene, R. J. (1993), ‘Person-focused pay: Should it replace job-based pay?’, Compensation and Benefits Management, 9(4): 46–54.Google Scholar

Grint, K. (1995), Management: A Sociological Introduction, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Grote, D. (2005), Forced Ranking: Making Performance Management Work, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.Google Scholar

Guest, D. (1997), ‘Human resource management and performance: A review and research agenda’, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 8(3): 263–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guest, D. (1998), ‘Is the psychological contract worth taking seriously?’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(Special issue): 649–64.3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guest, D. (1999), ‘Human resource management – the workers’ verdict', Human Resource Management Journal, 9(3): 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guest, D. (2001), ‘Human resource management: When research confronts theory’, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(7): 1092–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guest, D. (2002), ‘Human resource management, corporate performance and employee wellbeing: Building the worker into HRM’, Journal of Industrial Relations, 44(3): 335–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guest, D. & Conway, N. (1998), Fairness at Work and the Psychological Contract, Institute of Personnel and Development, London.Google Scholar

Guest, D. & Conway, N. (2002), ‘Communicating the psychological contract: An employer perspective’, Human Resource Management Journal, 12(2): 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guest, D. E. & Peccei, R. (2001), ‘Partnership at work: Mutuality and the balance of advantage’, British Journal of Human Resource Management, 39(2): 207–36.Google Scholar

Gumbel, A. (2006), ‘Managerial power and executive pay’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26(1): 219–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gupta, N. (1997), ‘Rewarding skills in the public sector’, in Risher, H. & Fay, C. (eds), New Strategies for Public Pay, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 125–44.Google Scholar

Gupta, N. & Jenkins, G. D. (1991), ‘Practical problems in using job evaluation systems to determine compensation’, Human Resource Management Review, 1(2): 133–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gupta, N., Ledford, G., Jenkins, D. & Doty, D. (1992), ‘Survey-based prescriptions for skill-based pay’, WorldatWork Journal, 1(1): 48–59.Google Scholar

Gupta, N. & Mitra, A. (1998), ‘The value of financial incentives: Myths and empirical realities’, WorldatWork Journal, 7(3): 58–66.Google Scholar

Gupta, N. & Shaw, J. (1998), ‘Let the evidence speak: Financial incentives are effective!!’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 30(2): 26, 28–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hackman, J. R. & Oldham, G. R. (1976), ‘Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory’, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16: 250–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, B. J. & Liebman, J. B. (1998), ‘Are CEOs really paid like bureaucrats?’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(3): 653–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halsey, F. A. (1896), ‘The premium plan for paying for labour’, Economic Studies, 1(2): 51–73.Google Scholar

Hammer, M. & Champy, J. (1993), Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution, Harper Business Books, New York.Google Scholar

Hammer, T. (1991), ‘Gainsharing’, in Steers, R. M. & Porter, L. W. (eds), Motivation and Work Behavior, 5th edn, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 531–43.Google Scholar

Handlin, H. C. (1992), ‘The company built upon the golden rule: Lincoln Electric’, in Hopkins, B. & Mawhinney, T. (eds), Pay for Performance: History, Controversy, and Evidence, Hawthorne Press, New York, pp. 151–64 (special issue of the Journal of Organizational Behaviour Management, 12(1)).Google Scholar

Harley, B. & Hardy, C. (2004), ‘Firing blanks? An analysis of discursive struggle in HRM’, Journal of Management Studies, 41(3): 377–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, M. M. & Schaubroeck, J. (1988), ‘A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings’, Personnel Psychology, 41(1): 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haslett, S. (1995), ‘Broadbanding: A strategic tool for organisational change’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 27(6): 40–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hastings, D. F. (1999), ‘Lincoln Electric's harsh lessons from international expansion’, Harvard Business Review, 77(3): 162–80.Google Scholar

Hastings, S. (2000), ‘Grading systems and estimating value’, in White, G. & Drucker, J. (eds) (2000), Reward Management: A Critical Text, Routledge, London, pp. 84–105.Google Scholar

Hatcher, L. & Ross, T. L. (1991), ‘From individual incentives to organization-wide gainsharing plan: Effects on teamwork and product quality’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12(3): 169–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hattrup, K., O'Connell, M. S. & Wingate, P. H. (1998), ‘Prediction of multidimensional criteria: Distinguishing task and contextual performance’, Human Performance, 11(4): 305–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hay, D. (1998), Maximising the Impact of Recognition: An Approach to Rewarding Employee Contributions, American Compensation Association, Scottsdale, AZ.Google Scholar

Heery, E. (1996), ‘Risk, representation and the “new pay” ’, Personnel Review, 25(6): 54–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heery, E. (1997a), ‘Performance-related pay and trade union de-recognition’, Employee Relations, 19(3): 208–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heery, E. (1997b), ‘Performance-related pay and trade union membership’, Employee Relations, 19(5): 430–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heider, F. (1958), The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations, John Wiley & Sons, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heneman, H. G. & Judge, T. A. (2000), ‘Compensation attitudes’, in Rynes, S. L. & Gerhart, B. (eds), Compensation in Organizations: Current Research and Practice, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 61–103.

Heneman, R. (1990), ‘Merit pay research’, Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 8: 203–63.Google Scholar

Heneman, R. (1992), Merit Pay: Linking Pay Increases to Performance Ratings, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar

Heneman, R. L., Fisher, M. M. & Dixon, K. E. (2001), ‘Reward and organizational systems alignment: An expert system’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 33(6): 18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heneman, R. L. & LeBlanc, P. (2002), ‘Developing a more relevant and competitive approach for valuing knowledge work’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 34(4): 43–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heneman, R. L. & LeBlanc, P. (2003), ‘Work valuation addresses shortcomings of both job evaluation and market pricing’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 35(1): 7–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heneman, R. L., Ledford, G. E. & Gresham, M. T. (2000), ‘The changing nature of work and its effects on compensation design and delivery’, in Rynes, S. L. & Gerhart, B. (eds), Compensation in Organizations: Current Research and Practice, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 195–240.Google Scholar

Heneman, R. L. & Hipple, C. (1995), ‘Balancing group and individual rewards: Rewarding individual contributions to the team’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 27(4): 63–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herriot, P., Manning, W. E. G. & Kidd, J. M. (1997), ‘The content of the psychological contract’, British Journal of Management, 8: 151–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herzberg, F. (1966), Work and the Nature of Man, Staples Press, New York.Google Scholar

Herzberg, F. (1987), ‘One more time: How do you motivate employees?’, Harvard Business Review, 65(5): 109–20 (first published 1967).Google Scholar

Heywood, J. S., Hubler, O. & Jirjahn, U. (1998), ‘Variable payment schemes and industrial relations: Evidence from Germany’, Kyklos 51: 237–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hilling, F. (2003), ‘Job evaluation is here to stay’, WorldatWork Journal, 12(3): 14–21.Google Scholar

Hiltrop, J. M. (1996), ‘The impact of human resource management on organisational performance: Theory and research’, European Management Journal, 14(6): 628–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ho, V. T. (2005), ‘Social influence on evaluations of psychological contract fulfillment’, Academy of Management Review, 30(1): 113–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hodgetts, R. M. (1997), ‘Discussing incentive compensation with Donald Hastings of Lincoln Electric’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 29(5): 60–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hofrichter, D. (1993), ‘Broadbanding: A second generation approach’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 25(5): 53–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hofrichter, D. & McGovern, T. (2001), ‘People, competencies and performance: Clarifying means and ends’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 33(4): 34–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hofrichter, D. & Spencer, L. (1996), ‘Competencies: The right foundation for effective human resources management’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 28(6): 21–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hofstede, G. (1984), Culture's Consequences, Sage, London.Google Scholar

Hogan, J., Rybicki, S. L., Motowidlo, S. J. & Borman, W. (1998), ‘Relations between contextual performance, personality, and occupational advancement’, Human Performance, 11(2/3): 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmes, R. W. (1980–81), ‘Job evaluation: Theory and practice’, Parts 1 & 2, Human Resource Management Australia, 18(4): 42–9 & 19(1): 45–52.Google Scholar

Homans, G. C. (1961), Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms, Harcourt, Brace & World, New York.Google Scholar

Houldsworth, E. & Jirasinghe, D. 2006, Managing and Measuring Employee Performance, Kogan Page, London.Google Scholar

House of Representatives Standing Committee on Employment, Education and Workplace Relations (2000), Shared Endeavours: Inquiry into Employee Share Ownership in Australian Enterprises, Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.

Hurtz, G. M. & Donovan, J. J. (2000), ‘Personality and job performance: The big five revisited’, Journal of Applied Psychology 85: 869–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huselid, M. A. (1995), ‘The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance’, Academy of Management Journal, 38: 635–72.Google Scholar

Huselid, M. A. & Becker, B. (1995), The Strategic Impact of High Performance Work Systems, Working Paper, School of Management and Labor Relations, Rutgers University, NJ.Google Scholar

Huselid, M. A. & Becker, B. (1996), ‘Methodological issues in cross-sectional and panel estimates of the human resource-performance link’, Industrial Relations, 35: 400–22.Google Scholar

Huselid, M. A., Becker, B. & Ulrich, D. (2001), The HR Scorecard: Linking People, Strategy and Performance, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.Google Scholar

Hyman, R. & Brough, T., 1975, Values and Industrial Relations: A Study in Fairness and Equity, Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ichniowski, C., Shaw, K. & Prennushi, G. (1997), ‘The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines’, American Economic Review, 87(3): 291–313.Google Scholar

Iverson, R. D. & Buttigieg, D. (1999), ‘Affective, normative and continuance commitment: Can the “right kind” of commitment be managed?’, Journal of Management Studies, 36(3): 307–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, S. E. & Schuler, R. S. (1995), ‘Understanding human resource management in the context of organizations and their environments’, Annual Review of Psychology, 46: 237–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, S. E., Schuler, R. S. & Rivero, J. C. (1989), ‘Organization characteristics as predictors of personnel practices’, Personnel Psychology, 42: 727–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janssens, M. & Steyaert, C. (1999), ‘The inhuman space of HRM’, Organization, 6(2): 371–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jenkins, G. D., Ledford, G. E., Gupta, N. & Doty, H. (1992), Skill-Based Pay: Practices, Payoffs, Pitfalls and Prescriptions, American Compensation Association, Scottsdale, AZ.Google Scholar

Jensen, M. & Meckling, W. H. (1976), ‘Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structures’, Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jensen, M. & Murphy, K. (1990), ‘Performance pay and top-management incentives’, Journal of Political Economy, 98(2): 225–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jensen, M., Murphy, K. J. & Wruck, E. (2004), ‘Remuneration: Where we've been, how we got here, what are the problems, and how to fix them’, European Corporate Governance Institute, Finance Working Paper No. 44/2004, www.ecgi.org/wp.

Johnson, A. (1999), ‘Should options reward absolute or relative shareholder returns?’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 31(1): 38–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, E. E. & Harris, V. A. (1967), ‘The attribution of attitudes’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahn, L. M. & Sherer, P. D. (1990), ‘Contingent pay and managerial performance’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 43: 107S–20S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kokesch, S. & Anderson, M. Z. (2001), ‘Executive coaching: A comprehensive review of the literature’, Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 53(4): 205–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kanfer, R. (1998), ‘Motivation’, in Nicholson, N. (ed.), Blackwell Encyclopaedic Dictionary of Organizational Behavior, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 330–6.Google Scholar

Kao, T. & Kantor, R. (2004), ‘Total rewards: From clarity to action’, WorldatWork Journal, 13(4): 32–40.Google Scholar

Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (1992), ‘The balanced scorecard – measures that drive performance’, Harvard Business Review, 69(1): 71–9.Google Scholar

Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (1996a), The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.Google Scholar

Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (1996b), ‘Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system’, Harvard Business Review, 73(1), 75–85.Google Scholar

Kates, C. & Tuttle, T. J. (1996), ‘A labor perspective on fair pay: High performance work at Corning Inc.’, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 9(1): 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, R. T. (1992), ‘The effects of improshare on productivity’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45: 311–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kay, I. (1999), ‘Growing shareholder value: Why executive stock ownership works’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 31(1): 32–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keenoy, T. (1990a), ‘HRM: A case of the wolf in sheep's clothing?’, Personnel Review, 19(2): 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keenoy, T. (1990b), ‘HRM: Rhetoric, reality and contradiction’, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1(3): 363–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keenoy, T. & Anthony, P. (1992), ‘HRM: Metaphor, meaning and morality’, in Blyton, P. & Turnbull, P. (eds), Reassessing Human Resource Management, Sage Publications, London, pp. 233–52.Google Scholar

Kessler, I. (1994), ‘Performance pay’, in Sisson, K. (ed.), Personnel Management, 2nd edn, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 465–94.Google Scholar

Kessler, I. & Purcell, J. (1995), ‘Individualism and collectivism in theory and practice: Management style and the design of pay systems’, in Edwards, P. (ed.), Industrial Relations, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 337–67.Google Scholar

Kidder, D. L. & Buchholtz, A. K. (2002), ‘Can excess bring success? CEO compensation and the psychological contract’, Human Resource Management Review, 12: 599–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kilburg, R. R. (1996), ‘Toward a conceptual understanding and definition of executive coaching’, Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 48(2): 134–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kim, D.-O. & Voos, P. (1997), ‘Unionization, union involvement, and the performance of gainsharing programs’, Industrial Relations(Relations Industrielles), 52(2): 304–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kim, S. (1998), ‘Does profit sharing increase firms’ profits?', Journal of Labor Research, 19: 351–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klaas, B. (2002), ‘Compensation in the jobless organisation’, Human Resource Management Review, 12: 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, A. L. (1996), ‘Validity and reliability for competency-based systems’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 28(4): 31–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, K. (1987), ‘Employee stock ownership and employee attitudes: A test of three models’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(2): 319–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klinger, S., Hartman, C., Anderson, S., Cavanagh, J. & Sklar, H. (2002), ‘Executive excess 2002: Ninth annual CEO compensation survey’, Institute for Policy Studies and United for a Fair Economy, Boston, www.faireconomy.org.

Kochan, T., McKersie, R., & Cappelli, P. (1984), ‘Strategic choice and industrial relations theory’, Industrial Relations, 23(1): 16–39.Google Scholar

Kochan, T. & Osterman, P. (1995), The Mutual Gains Enterprise, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Kochanski, J. & Risher, H. (1999), ‘Paying for competencies: Rewarding knowledge, skills and behaviors’, in Risher, H. (ed.), Aligning Pay and Results: Compensation Strategies that Work from the Boardroom to the Shop Floor, AMACOM, New York, pp. 145–71.Google Scholar

Kohn, A. (1993a), Punished by Rewards, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.Google Scholar

Kohn, A. (1993b), ‘Why incentive plans cannot work’, Harvard Business Review, 71(5): 54–63.Google Scholar

Kohn, A. (1998), ‘Challenging behaviorist dogma: Myths about money and motivation’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 30(2): 27 & 33–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Konovsky, M. A. (2000), ‘Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organisations’, Journal of Management, 26(3): 489–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Konovsky, M. A. & Organ, D. W. (1996), ‘Dispositional and contextual determinants of organizational citizenship behavior’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17(3): 253–66.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kozlowski, S. W. J., Chao, G. T. & Morrison, R. F. (1998), ‘Games raters play: Politics, strategies, and impression management in performance appraisal’, in Smither, J. W. (ed.), Performance Appraisal: State of the Art in Practice, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 163–208.Google Scholar

Kramer, R. M. (1999), ‘Trust and distrust in organisations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions’, Annual Review of Psychology, 50: 569–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kruse, D. (1991), ‘Profit sharing and employment variability: Microeconomic evidence on the Weitzman theory’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 44: 437–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kruse, D. (1993), Profit Sharing: Does it Make a Difference?, Upjohn Institute, Kalamazoo, MI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lander, D. & O'Neill, G. (1991), ‘Pay equity: Apples, oranges and a can of worms’, Asia Pacific Human Resource Management, Autumn: 16–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landy, F. S. & Farr, J. L. (1983), The Measurement of Work Performance: Methods, Theory, and Applications, Academic Press, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar

Lansbury, R., Braithwaite, J. & Westbrook, J. (1995), ‘Goal-directed approaches to performance appraisal’, in O'Neill, G. & Kramar, R. (eds), Australian Human Resource Management, Pitman Publishers, Melbourne, Vic, pp. 145–54.Google Scholar

Latham, G. P. & Locke, E. A. (2006), ‘Enhancing the benefits and overcoming the pitfalls of goal setting’, Organizational Dynamics, 35(4): 332–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latham, G. P. & Pinder, C. C. (2005), ‘Work motivation theory and research at the dawn of the twenty-first century’, Annual Review of Psychology, 56: 485–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latham, G. P. & Wexley, K. N. (1977), ‘Behavioral observation scales’, Personnel Psychology, 30: 255–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latham, G. P. & Wexley, K. N. (1994), Increasing Productivity Through Performance Appraisal, 2nd edn, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar

Lawler, E. E. (1971), Pay and Organizational Effectiveness, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar

Lawler, E. E. (1986), High Involvement Management, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar

Lawler, E. E. (1988), ‘What's wrong with point-factor job evaluation’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 18(2): 20–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawler, E. E. (1990), Strategic Pay: Aligning Organizational Strategies and Pay Systems, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar

Lawler, E. E. (1991), ‘Paying the person: A better approach to management?’, Human Resource Management Review, 1(2): 145–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawler, E. E. (1992), The Ultimate Advantage: Creating the High Involvement Organization, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar

Lawler, E. E. (1994a), ‘From job-based to competency-based organisations’, Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 15: 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawler, E. E. (1994b; first published 1973), Motivation in Work Organizations, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar

Lawler, E. E. (1994c), ‘Performance management: The next generation’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 26(3): 16–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawler, E. E. (1996), ‘Competencies: A poor foundation for the new pay’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 28(6): 20–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawler, E. E. (2000), Rewarding Excellence: Pay Strategies for the New Economy, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar

Lawler, E. E. (2002), ‘The folly of forced ranking’, Strategy and Business, 28: 28–33.Google Scholar

Lawler, E. E. (2003), ‘Reward practices and performance management system effectiveness’, Organizational Dynamics, 32(4): 396–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawler, E. E. (2005), ‘Creating high performance organizations’, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 43(1): 10–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawler, E. E. & Cohen, S. G. (1992), ‘Designing pay systems for teams’, WorldatWork Journal, 1(1): 6–19.Google Scholar

Lawler, E. E. & Ledford, G. E. (1985), ‘Skill-based pay: A concept that's catching on’, Personnel 62(9): 30–7.Google Scholar

Lawler, E. E., Ledford, G. E. & Chang, L. (1993), ‘Who uses skill-based pay, and why?’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 25(2): 22–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawler, E. E. & Mohrman, S. A. (1989), ‘High-involvement management’, Personnel, 66(4): 27–31.Google Scholar

Lawler, E. E., Mohrman, S. A. & Ledford, G. E. (1992), Employee Involvement and Total Quality Management: Practices and Results in Fortune 1000 Companies, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar

Lazear, E., & Rosen, S. (1981), ‘Rank order tournaments as optimum labour contracts’, Journal of Political Economy, 89: 841–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

LeBlanc, P. V. (1991), ‘Skill-based pay case study number 2: Northern Telecom’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 23(2): 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

LeBlanc, P. V. & Ellis, C. (1995), ‘A testimonial from eight organizations: The many faces of banding’, WorldatWork Journal, 4(4): 52–63.Google Scholar

LeBlanc, P. V. & Mulvey, P. W. (1998), ‘How American workers see the rewards of work’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 30(1): 24–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ledford, G. E. (1991a), ‘Three case studies on skill-based pay: An overview’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 23(2): 11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ledford, G. E. (1991b), ‘The design of skill-based pay plans’, in Rock, M. & Berger, L. (eds), The Compensation Handbook: A State of the Art Guide to Compensation Strategy and Design, 3rd edn, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 199–217.Google Scholar

Ledford, G. E. & Bergel, G. (1991), ‘Skill-based pay case number 1: General Mills’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 23(2): 24–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ledford, G. E., Tyler, W. R. & Dixey, W. B. (1991), ‘Skill-based pay case number 3: Honeywell Ammunition Assembly Plant’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 23(2): 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, J., Havighurst, L. & Rassel, G. (2004), ‘Factors related to court references to performance appraisal fairness and validity’, Public Personnel Management, 33(1): 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Legge, K. (1995a), Human Resource Management: Rhetorics and Realities, Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Legge, K. (1995b), ‘HRM: Rhetoric, reality and hidden agendas’, in Storey, J. (ed.), Human Resource Management: A Critical Text, Routledge, London, pp. 33–59.Google Scholar

Lengnick-Hall, M. L. & Bereman, N. A. (1994), ‘A conceptual framework for the study of employee benefits’, Human Resource Management Review, 4(2): 101–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lenne, J., Mitchell, R. & Ramsay, I. (2005), ‘Employee share ownership schemes in Australia: A survey of key issues and themes’, Centre for Corporate Law and Securities Regulation & Centre for Employment and Labour Relations Law, University of Melbourne.

Lesieur, F. G. (ed.) (1958), The Scanlon Plan: A Frontier in Labor–Management Cooperation, Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Levenson, R. A., Stede, A. W. & Cohen, G. S. (2006), ‘Measuring the relationship between managerial competencies and performance’, Journal of Management, 32(3): 360–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leventhal, G. S., Karuza, J. & Fry, W. R. (1980), ‘Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences’, in Mikula, G. (ed.), Justice and Social Interaction, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 167–218.Google Scholar

Levinson, H. (1970), ‘Management by whose objectives?’, Harvard Business Review, July–August: 125–34.Google Scholar

Levinthal, D. 1988, ‘A survey of agency models of organizations’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organizations, 9: 153–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lichty, D. T. (1999), ‘Compensation surveys’, in Berger, L. A. & Berger, D. R., The Compensation Handbook: A State-of-the-Art Guide to Compensation Strategy and Design, 4th edn, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 87–103.Google Scholar

Lilling, M. S. (2006), ‘The link between CEO compensation and firm performance: Does simultaneity matter?’, Atlantic Economic Journal, 34: 101–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Littler, C. (1982), The Development of the Labour Process in Capitalist Societies, Heinemann, London.Google Scholar

Locke, E. A. & Henne, D. (1986), ‘Work motivation theories’, in Cooper, C. L. & Robertson, I. T. (eds), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology: 1986, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 1–35.Google Scholar

Locke, E. A. & Latham, G. P. (1984), Goal Setting: A Motivational Technique That Works!Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar

Locke, E. A. & Latham, G. P. (1990), A Theory of Goal-Setting and Task Performance, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar

Locke, E. A. & Latham, G. P. (2002), ‘Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey’, American Psychologist, 57: 705–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, J. (1997), ‘The dark side of mentoring’, Australian Educational Research, 24(2): 115–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, R. (1978), ‘The effects of employee ownership on organisational identification, employee job attitudes, and organisational performance: A tentative framework and empirical findings’, Human Relations, 31(1): 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, R. (1981), ‘The effects of formal employee participation in ownership and decision making on perceived and desired patterns of organizational influence: A longitudinal study’, Human Relations, 34(10): 847–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, R. (1982), ‘Worker ownership and job attitudes: A field study’, Industrial Relations, 21(2): 196–215.Google Scholar

Long, R. (1989), ‘Patterns of workplace innovation in Canada’, Relations Industrielles (Industrial Relations), 44: 805–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, R. (1994), ‘Gain sharing, hierarchy, and managers: Are they substitutes?’, Proceeding of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada (Organization Theory Division), 15: 51–60.Google Scholar

Long, R. (1997), ‘Motives for profit sharing: Study of Canadian chief executive officers’, Relations Industrielles, 52(4): 712–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, R. (2006), Strategic Compensation in Canada, 3rd edn, Thomson Nelson, Scarborough, Ont.Google Scholar

Long, R. & Shields, J. (2005a), ‘Best practice or best fit? High involvement management and base pay practices in Canadian and Australian firms’, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 43(1): 52–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, R. & Shields, J. (2005b), ‘High involvement management and performance pay in Canadian and Australian firms’, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(1): 1783–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Longenecker, C., Sims, H., & Gioia, D. (1987), ‘Behind the mask: The politics of employee appraisal’, Academy of Management Executive, 1(3): 183–93.Google Scholar

Lowe, K. B., Milliman, J., Cieri, H., & Dowling, P. J. (2002), ‘International compensation practices: A ten-country comparative analysis’, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 40(1): 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lowery, C., Beadles, N. A., Petty, M. M., Amsler, G. M. & Thompson, J. W. (2002), ‘An empirical examination of a merit bonus plan’, Journal of Management Issues, 14(1): 100–17.Google Scholar

Lowry, J. & Dignam, A. (2006), Company Law, 3rd edn, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Lucia, A. D. & Lepsinger, R. (1999), The Art and Science of Competency Models: Pinpointing the Critical Success Factors in Organizations, Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer, San Francisco.Google Scholar

McAdams, J. L. (1991), ‘Nonmonetary awards’, in Rock, M. & Berger, L. (eds), The Compensation Handbook: A State of the Art Guide to Compensation Strategy and Design, 3rd edn, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 218–35.Google Scholar

McAdams, J. L. (1995), ‘Rewarding special performance: Low-cost, high-impact awards’, in Risher, H. & Fay, C. (eds), The Performance Imperative: Strategies for Enhancing Workforce Effectiveness, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 361–88.Google Scholar

McAdams, J. L. (1996), The Reward Plan Advantage: A Manager's Guide to Improving Business Performance Through People, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

McAdams, J. L. (1999), ‘Nonemonetary rewards: Cash equivalents and tangible awards’, in Berger, L. A. & Berger, D. R.The Compensation Handbook: A State-of-the-Art Guide to Compensation Strategy and Design, 4th edn, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 241–60.Google Scholar

McAdams, J. L. (2000), ‘The essential role of rewarding teams and teamwork’, Compensation and Benefits Management, 16(4): 15–27.Google Scholar

McClelland, D. C. (1961), The Achieving Society, Van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McClelland, D. C. (1973), ‘Testing for competence rather than for “intelligence” ’, American Psychologist, 28(1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McClelland, D. C. & Burnham, D. H. (1976), ‘Power is the great motivator’, Harvard Business Review, 54(2): 100–10.Google Scholar

MacDuffie, J. P. (1995), ‘Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(2): 197–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGregor, D. (1960), The Human Side of the Enterprise, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar

Manas, T. (1999), ‘Making the balanced scorecard approach pay off’, WorldatWork Journal, 8(2): 12–21.Google Scholar

Manas, T. M. & Graham, M. D. (2003), Creating a Total Rewards Strategy: A Toolkit for Designing Business-Based Plans, AMACOM, New York.Google Scholar

Marchington, M. & Grugulis, I. (2000), ‘“Best practice” human resource management: Perfect opportunity or dangerous illusion?’, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(6): 1104–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marquardt, E. (1997), ‘Aligning strategy and performance with the balanced scorecard: An interview with David P. Norton’, WorldatWork Journal, 6(3): 18–27.Google Scholar

Marriott, R. (1957), Incentive Payment Systems, Staples Press, London.Google Scholar

Marsden, D. (2004), ‘The role of performance-related pay in renegotiating the “effort bargain”: The case of the British Public Service’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 57(3): 350–70.Google Scholar

Marsden, D. & Richardson, R. (1994), ‘Performing for pay? The effects of “merit pay” on motivation in a public service’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 32(2): 243–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marshall, V. & Wood, R. E. (2000), ‘The dynamics of effective performance appraisal: An integrated model’, Asia-Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 38(3): 62–90.Google Scholar

Martin, J. (1981), ‘Relative deprivation: A theory of distributive injustice for an era of shrinking resources’, in Cummins, L. L. & Staw, B. M. (eds), Research in Organizational Behavior, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 53–107.Google Scholar

Martin, J. (1982), ‘The fairness of earning differentials: An experimental study of the perceptions of blue-collar workers’, Journal of Human Resources, 17: 110–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martocchio, J. J. (2006), Strategic Compensation: A Human Resource Management Approach, 3rd edn, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google Scholar

Maslow, A. H. (1943), ‘A theory of human motivation’, Psychological Review, July: 370–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mercer Human Resource Consulting (2004), Australian Benefits Review, Mercer, Sydney.

Merhebi, R., Swan, P. L. & Zhou, X. (2006), ‘Australian CEO remuneration: Pay and performance’, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 46(3): 481–97.Google Scholar

Meyer, H. H. (1980), ‘Self-appraisal of job performance’, Personnel Psychology, 33: 291–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyer, J. & Allen, N. J. (1991), ‘A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment’, Human Resource Management Review, (1)1: 61–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyer, J. & Herscovitch, L. (2001), ‘Commitment in the workplace: Towards a general model’, Human Resource Management Review, 11(3): 299–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyer, J., Stanley, D., Herscovich, L. & Topolnytsky, L. (2002), ‘Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences’, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61: 20–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyer, J. & Topolnytsky, L. (2000), ‘Building and maintaining employee commitment: Implications for HRM policy and practice’, in Travaglione, A. & Marshall, V. (eds), Human Resource Strategies: An Applied Approach, Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Sydney, pp. 335–73.Google Scholar

Miles, R. E. & Snow, C. C. (1978), Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar

Miles, R. E. & Snow, C. C. (1984), ‘Designing strategic human resource systems’, Organizational Dynamics, 13(1): 36–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mishra, C. S., McConaughy, D. L. & Gobeli, D. H. (2000), ‘Effectiveness of CEO pay-for-performance’, Review of Financial Economics, 9(1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, D. J. B., Lewin, D. & Lawler, E. E. (1990), ‘Alternative pay systems, firm performance and productivity’, in Blinder, A. S. (ed.), Paying for Productivity: A Look at the Evidence, Brookings Institution, Washington DC, pp. 15–95.Google Scholar

Mitra, A., Gupta, N. & Jenkins, G. (1995), ‘The case of the invisible merit rise: How people see their pay rises’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 27(3): 71–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitra, A., Gupta, N. & Jenkins, G. (1997), ‘A drop in the bucket: When is a pay raise a pay raise?’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(2): 117–37.3.0.CO;2-1>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mohrman, A. M. & Mohrman, S. A. (1995), ‘Performance management is “running the business” ’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 27(3): 69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mone, E. M. & London, M. (2002), Fundamentals of Performance Management, Spiro Press, London.Google Scholar

Montemayor, E. (1994), ‘A model for aligning teamwork and pay’, WorldatWork Journal, 3(2): 18–25.Google Scholar

Mooraj, S., Oyon, D. & Hostettler, D. (1999), ‘The balanced scorecard: A necessary good or an unnecessary evil?’, European Management Journal, 17(5): 481–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moorman, R. H., Niehoff, B. P. & Organ, D. W. (1993), ‘Treating employees fairly and organizational citizenship behavior: Sorting the effects of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and procedural justice’, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 6(3): 209–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morehead, A., Steele, M., Alexander, M., Stephen, K. & Duffin, L. (1997), Changes at Work: The 1995 Australian Workplace Industrial Relations Survey, Longman, Melbourne.Google Scholar

Morrison, E. W. & Robinson, S. L. (1997), ‘When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops’, Academy of Management Review, 22(1): 226–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mount, M. K. & Barrick, M. R. (1998), ‘Five reasons why the “big five” article has been frequently cited’, Personnel Psychology, 51: 849–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mowday, R. T. (1991), ‘Equity theory predictions of behavior in organizations’, in Steers, R. M. & Porter, L. W. (eds), Motivation and Work Behavior, 5th edn, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 111–30.Google Scholar

Murphy, K. J. (2002), ‘Explaining executive compensation: Managerial power versus the perceived cost of stock options’, University of Chicago Law Review, 69: 847–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murphy, K. R. & Cleveland, J. N. (1995), Understanding Performance Appraisal: Social, Organizational and Goal-Based Perspectives, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar

Murphy, K. R. & Constans, J. I. (1987), ‘Behavioral anchors as a source of bias in rating’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(4): 573–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murphy, K. R., Jako, R. A., & Anhalt, R. L. (1993), ‘The nature and consequences of halo error: A critical analysis’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2): 218–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murphy, K. R., Martin, C. & Garcia, M. (1982), ‘Do behavioral observation scales measure observation?’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(5): 562–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murray, B. & Gerhart, B. (2000), ‘Skill-based pay and skill seeking’, Human Resource Management Review, 10(3): 271–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murray, M. & Owen, M. A. (1991), Beyond the Myths and Magic of Mentoring: How to Facilitate an Effective Mentoring Programme, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar

Nankervis, A. & Compton, R. (2006), ‘Performance management: Theory in practice?’, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 44(1): 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nankervis, A. & Leece, P. (1997), ‘Performance appraisal: Two steps forward, one step back?’, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 35(2): 80–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neal, A., & Griffin, M. A. (1999), ‘Developing a model of individual performance for human resource management’, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 37(3): 44–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, B. (1994), 1001 Ways to Reward Employees, Workman Publishing, New York.Google Scholar

Nelson, B. (1996), ‘Dump the cash, load on the praise’, Personnel Journal, July: 65–70.Google Scholar

Nelson, B. (1997), ‘Does one reward fit all?’, Workforce, 76(2): 67–70.Google Scholar

Neubauer, R. (1995), ‘Broadbanding: Management fad or savior?’, Compensation and Benefits Management, 11(4): 50–4.Google Scholar

Neuhold, K. & Hay Group (2005), ‘Trends in executive remuneration’, paper presented at Informa Conference on Executive Remuneration, Sydney, 15 March.

Noon, M. (1992), ‘HRM: A map, model or theory?’, in Blyton, P. & Turnbull, P. (eds), Reassessing Human Resource Management, Sage Publications, London, pp. 16–32.Google Scholar