Commission, ‘A Copyright Policy for Creativity and Innovation in the European Union’ (2014) White Paper, Internal DraftGoogle Scholar

Commission , ‘A Digital Agenda for Europe’ (Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions) COM(2010) 245 final/2, Brussels, 19 May 2010Google Scholar

Commission , ‘A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe – Analysis and Evidence Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions’ (Commission Staff Working Document) SWD(2015) 100 final, Brussels, 6 May 2015Google Scholar

Commission , ‘A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe’ (Communication) COM(2015) 192 finalGoogle Scholar

Commission , ‘A Single Market for Intellectual Property Rights, Boosting creativity and innovation to provide economic growth, high quality jobs and first class products and services in Europe’ (Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions) COM(2011) 287 final, Brussels, 24 May 2011Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Antitrust: Commission accepts commitments by Paramount on cross-border pay-TV services’ (Press release) IP/16/2645, Brussels, 26 July 2016Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Antitrust: Commission investigates restrictions affecting cross border provision of pay TV services’ (Press release) IP/14/15, Brussels, 13 January 2014Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Antitrust: European Commission welcomes Apple’s announcement to equalise prices for music downloads from iTunes in Europe’ (Press release) IP/08/22, Brussels, 9 January 2008Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Better regulation for better results – An EU Agenda’ (Communication) COM(2015) 215 finalGoogle Scholar

Commission , ‘Better Regulation Guidelines’ (latest edition 19.5.2015) SWD(2015) 111 final, ‘Commission opens proceedings into collective licensing of music copyrights for online use’ (Press release) IP/04/586, Brussels, 3 May 2004Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Commission proposes new e-commerce rules to help consumers and companies reap full benefit of Single Market’ (Press release) IP/16/1887, Brussels, 25 May 2016Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Commissioner Michel Barnier welcomes the trilogue agreement on collective rights management’ (Press release) MEMO/13/955, Brussels, 5 November 2013Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Competition: European Commission confirms sending a Statement of Objections against alleged territorial restrictions in on-line music sales to major record companies and Apple’ (Press release) MEMO/07/126, Brussels, 3 April 2007Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Content in the Digital Single Market’ (Communication) COM(2012) 789 finalGoogle Scholar

Commission , ‘Copyright: Commission urges industry to deliver innovative solutions for greater access to online content’ (Press release) IP/12/1394, Brussels, 18 December 2012Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Creative Content, in a European Digital Single Market: Challenges for the Future’ (A Reflection Document of DG INFSO and DG MARKT) 22 October 2009Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Creative Europe, Supporting Europe’s cultural and creative sectors’ (European Commission, 2016) https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/creative-europe/media/online-distribution_enGoogle Scholar

Commission , ‘Cross-border Access to Online Content, Report’ (2015) Flash Eurobarometer 411, TNS Political & SocialGoogle Scholar

Commission , ‘Digital Single Market’ (European Commission, 25 February 2016) https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/digital-single-marketGoogle Scholar

Commission , ‘Document accompanying the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on creative content online in the Single Market’ (Commission Staff Working Document) SEC/2007/1710 final, Brussels, 3 January 2008Google Scholar

Commission , ‘European governance – A white paper’ (2002) White Paper, COM/2001/0428 final, OJ C287/1Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Geo-Blocking practices in e-commerce; Issues paper presenting initial findings of the e-commerce sector inquiry conducted by the Directorate-General for Competition’ (Commission Staff Working Document) SWD(2016) 70 final, Brussels, 18 March 2016Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Green Paper on Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society’ COM(95) 382 final, Brussels, 19 July 1995Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Guidelines on the applicability of Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to horizontal co-operation agreements’ (Communication – 2011/C 11/01) [2011] OJ C 11/1Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Guidelines on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty’ (Communication – Notice 2004/ C101/08) [2004] OJ C101/97Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Guidelines on the application of Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to technology transfer agreements’ (Communication) [2014] OJ C89/3Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Guidelines on Vertical Restraints’ (Information) [2010] OJ C130/1Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Impact Assessment accompanying the document Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on collective management of copyright and related rights and multi-territorial licensing of rights in musical works for online uses in the internal market’ (Commission Staff Working Document) SWD(2012) 204/2Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Impact Assessment accompanying the document Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council to ensure the cross-border portability of online content services in the internal market’ (Commission Staff Working Document) SWD(2015) 270/final, Brussels, 9 December 2015Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Impact Assessment accompanying the document proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on adressing [sic] geo-blocking and other forms of discriminiation [sic] based on place of residence or establishment or nationality within the Single Market’ (Commission Staff Working Document) SWD(2016) 173 final, Brussels, 25 May 2016Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Impact Assessment reforming cross-border collective management of copyright and related rights for legitimate online music services’ (Commission Staff Working Document) SEC(2005) 1254, Brussels, 11 October 2005Google Scholar

Commission , ‘The Juncker Commission: A strong and experienced team standing for change’ (Press release) IP/14/984, Brussels, 10 September 2014Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Lack of choice driving demand for film downloads’ (Press release) IP/14/120, Brussels, 6 February 2014Google Scholar

Commission , ‘The Management of Copyright and Related Rights in the Internal Market’ (Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee) COM(2004) 261 final, Brussels, 16 April 2004Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Monitoring of the 2005 Music Online Recommendation’ Brussels, 7 February 2008Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Online Platforms and the Digital Single Market, Opportunities and Challenges for Europe’ (2016) Communication from the Commission, DraftGoogle Scholar

Commission , ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on collective management of copyright and related rights and multi-territorial licensing of rights in musical works for online uses in the internal market’ COM(2012) 372/2, 2012/0180 (COD), Brussels, 11 July 2012Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2010/13/EU on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services in view of changing market realities’ COM(2016) 287 final, 2016/0151 (COD), Brussels, 25 May 2016Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on copyright in the Digital Single Market’ COM/2016/0593 final – 2016/0280 (COD), Brussels, 14 September 2016Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down rules on the exercise of copyright and related rights applicable to certain online transmissions of broadcasting organisations and retransmissions of television and radio programmes’ COM/2016/0594 final – 2016/0284 (COD), Brussels, 14 September 2016Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Proposal for a Regulation on addressing geo-blocking and other forms of discrimination based on customers’ nationality, place of residence or place of establishment within the internal market and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2009/22/EC’ COM(2016) 289 final, 2016/0152 (COD), Brussels, 25 May 2016Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Proposal for a Regulation on ensuring the cross-border portability of online content services’ COM(2015) 627 final, 2015/0284 (COD), Brussels, 9 December 2015Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Public Consultation on the review of the EU copyright rules’ (2013) http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/2013/copyright-rules/docs/consultation-document_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

Commission , ‘Public Consultation on the review of the EU copyright rules’ (23 July 2014) http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/2013/copyright-rules/index_en.htmGoogle Scholar

Commission , ‘Questions and answers – Digital Single Market Strategy’ (Press release) MEMO15/4920, Brussels, 6 May 2015Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Report from the European Commission on the application of Council Directive 93/83/EEC on the coordination of certain rules concerning copyright and rights related to copyright applicable to satellite broadcasting and cable retransmission’ COM(2002) 430 final, Brussels, 26 July 2002Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Report on the responses to the Public Consultation on the Review of the EU Copyright Rules’ (2014) DG MARKT, July 2014Google Scholar

Commission , ‘State of the Union 2016: Commission proposes modern EU copyright rules for European culture to flourish and circulate’ (Press release), IP/16/3010, Strasbourg, 14 September 2016Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Study on a Community Initiative on the Cross-Border Collective Management of Copyright’ (Commission Staff Working Document) Brussels, 7 July 2005Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Synopsis Report on the Responses to the Public Consultation on the Review of the Satellite and Cable Directive’, 4 May 2016Google Scholar

Commission , ‘Towards a modern, more European copyright framework’ (Communication) COM(2015) 626 finalGoogle Scholar

Council of the European Union, ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on collective management of copyright and related rights and multi-territorial licensing of rights in musical works for online use in the internal market, Statements’ (‘I/A’ Item Note 2014, 6434/14) Brussels, 17 February 2014Google Scholar

Council of the European Union , ‘Online cross-border TV and radio broadcasts: Council agrees negotiating stance’ (Press release) 808/17, 15 December 2017Google Scholar

Council of the European Union , ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down rules on the exercise of copyright and related rights applicable to certain online transmissions of broadcasting organisations and retransmissions of television and radio programmes – Final Presidency compromise proposal’ (Note 2017, 15898/17), 2016/0284 (COD), Brussels, 19 December 2017Google Scholar

Council of the European Union , ‘Draft Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on addressing unjustified geo-blocking and other forms of discrimination based on customers’ nationality, place of residence or place of establishment within the internal market and amending Regulations (EC) No 2006/2004 and (EU) 2017/2394 and Directive 2009/22/EC, Statements’ (‘I/A’ Item Note 2018, 6054/18), 2016/0152 (COD), Brussels, 19 February 2018Google Scholar

Council of the European Union , ‘Geo-blocking: Council adopts regulation to remove barriers to e-commerce’ (Press release) 95/18, 27 February 2018Google Scholar

European Parliament, ‘Report on a Community framework for collecting societies for authors’ rights (2002/2274(INI))’ Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market, Rapporteur: Raina A. Mercedes Echerer, A5-0478/2003 FINAL, 11 December 2003Google Scholar

European Parliament , ‘Resolution on a Community framework for collective management societies in the field of copyright and neighbouring rights (2002/2274(INI))’ P5_TA(2004)0036 OJ C92 E/425Google Scholar

European Parliament , ‘Resolution of 13 March 2007 on the Commission Recommendation of 18 October 2005 on collective cross-border management of copyright and related rights for legitimate online music services (2005/737/EC) (2006/2008(INI))’ P6_TA(2007)0064 OJ C301 E/64Google Scholar

European Parliament , ‘Resolution of 25 September 2008 on collective cross-border management of copyright and related rights for legitimate online music services’ P6_TA(2008)0462 (2010/C 8 E/19) OJ 8 E/105Google Scholar

European Parliament , ‘Opinion of the Committee on International Trade for the Committee on Legal Affairs on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on collective management of copyright and related rights and multi-territorial licensing of rights in musical works for online uses in the internal market (COM(2012)0372 – C7-0183/2012 – 2012/0180(COD))’ Committee on International Trade, Rapporteur: Helmut Scholz, 2012/0180(COD), 20 June 2013Google Scholar

European Parliament , ‘Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on collective management of copyright and related rights and multi-territorial licensing of rights in musical works for online uses in the internal market’ COM(2012) 372 final – 2012/0180 (COD)’ 2013/C 44/18 OJ C44/104Google Scholar

European Parliament , ‘Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on collective management of copyright and related rights and multi-territorial licensing of rights in musical works for online uses in the internal market (COM(2012)0372 – C7-0183/2012 – 2012/0180(COD))’ Committee on Legal Affairs, Rapporteur: Marielle Gallo, 2012/0180(COD), 4 October 2013Google Scholar

European Parliament , ‘Opinion of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy for the Committee on Legal Affairs on the implementation of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (2014/2256(INI))’ Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, Rapporteur: José Blanco López, 20 April 2015Google Scholar

European Parliament , ‘Report on the implementation of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (2014/2256(INI))’ Committee on Legal Affairs, Rapporteur: Julia Reda, PE 546.580v03-00, A8-0209/2015, 24 June 2015Google Scholar

European Parliament , ‘Draft Opinion of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection for the Committee on Legal Affairs on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on ensuring the cross-border portability of online content services in the internal market (COM(2015)0627 – C8-0392/2015 – 2015/0284(COD))’ Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, Rapporteur: Marco Zullo, PE583.879v01-00, 29 June 2016Google Scholar

European Parliament , ‘Draft Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on ensuring the cross-border portability of online content services in the internal market’ Committee on Legal Affairs, Rapporteur: Jean-Marie Cavada, 2015/0284(COD), 21 June 2016Google Scholar

European Parliament , ‘Opinion of the Committee on Culture and Education for the Committee on Legal Affairs on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on ensuring the cross-border portability of online content services in the internal market (COM(2015)0627 – C8-0392/2015 – 2015/0284(COD))’ Committee on Culture and Education, Rapporteur: Sabine Verheyen, 2015/0284(COD), 29 June 2016Google Scholar

European Parliament , ‘Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down rules on the exercise of copyright and related rights applicable to certain online transmissions of broadcasting organisations and retransmissions of television and radio programmes (COM(2016)0594 – C8-0384/2016 – 2016/0284(COD))’ Committee on Legal Affairs, Rapporteur: Tiemo Wölken, 27 November 2017Google Scholar

European Parliamentary Research Service, ‘Regulating online TV and radio broadcasting’ (Briefing, EU Legislation in Process), PE 620.217, April 2018Google Scholar

Folketinget, ‘Political opinion on Commission proposal for reform of EU copyright rules (Erik Christensen, Orla Hav)’ 11 May 2017Google Scholar

Intellectual Property Office, ‘Collective rights management in the digital single market, Consultation on the implementation of the EU Directive on the collective management of copyright and multi-territorial licensing of online music rights in the internal market’ [2015]Google Scholar

Joint Political Declaration of 28 September 2011 of Member States and the Commission on explanatory documents 2011/C 369/02 [2011] OJ C369/14Google Scholar

Kulturministeriet, ‘Forslag til Lov om kollektiv forvaltning af ophavsret’ (2015) Dok nr. 2772691Google Scholar

Licenses for Europe, ‘Ten pledges to bring more content online’ (13 November 2011) http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/copyright/docs/licences-for-europe/131113_ten-pledges_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

Norden, ‘Nordic Council: Digital television must be available to view throughout the Nordic Region’ (Nordic Council, 2 November 2017) www.norden.org/en/news-and-events/news/nordic-council-digital-television-must-be-available-to-view-throughout-the-nordic-regionGoogle Scholar

Praesidum of the European Convention, ‘Explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights’ (2007/C 303/02) [2007] OJ C303/17Google Scholar

Ackrill, R. and Kay, A., ‘Multiple streams in EU policy-making: The case of the 2005 sugar reform’, Journal of European Public Policy, 18 (2011), 72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aguiar, L. and Waldfogel, J., ‘Streaming Reaches Flood Stage: Does Spotify Stimulate or Depress Music Sales?’ (2015) NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 21653: www.nber.org/papers/w21653Google Scholar

Ahlborn, C., Evens, D. S. and Padila, A. J., ‘The Logic & Limits of the “Exceptional Circumstances Test” in Magill and IMS Health’, Fordham International Law Journal, 28 (2004), 1109Google Scholar

Andersen, M. B., Ret og metode (Gjellerup, 2002)Google Scholar

Ansip, Andrus C., ‘Speech by Vice-President Ansip at the Creators Conference’ (31 May 2016): https://ec.europa.eu/commission/2014–2019/ansip/announcements/speech-vice-president-ansip-creators-conference_enGoogle Scholar

Anthonis, E., ‘Will the CRM-directive succeed re-aggregating the mechanical reproduction rights in the Anglo-American music repertoire?’, International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 7 (2014), 151CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aoki, R. and Schiff, A., ‘Intellectual property clearinghouses: The effects of reduced transaction costs in licensing’, Information Economics and Policy, 22 (2010), 218CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arezzo, E., ‘Competition and intellectual property protection in the market for the provision of multi-territorial licensing of online rights in musical works – lights and shadows of the new European Directive 2014/26/EU’, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 46 (2015), 534CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Axhamn, J., ‘Nya normer för kollektiv rättighetsförvaltning på upphovsrättens område’, Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättskydd (2015) 675Google Scholar

Axhamn, J. and Guibault, J., Cross-border extended collective licensing: A solution to online dissemination of Europe’s cultural heritage? (Final report prepared for EuropeanaConnect, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barbière, C., ‘Geo-blocking attacked from all sides’ (EurActiv, 2015): www.euractiv.com/section/digital/news/geo-blocking-attacked-from-all-sides/Google Scholar

Barker, G. R., ‘Assessing the Economic Impact of Copyright Law: Evidence of the Effect of Free Music Downloads on the Purchase of Music CDs’. Centre for Law and Economics, ANU College of Law Working Paper No. 2 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnard, C. and Steve, P., European Union Law (Oxford University Press, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Batchelor, B. and Jenkins, T., ‘FA Premier League: The broader implications for copyright licensing’, European Competition Law Review, 33 (2012), 157Google Scholar

Batchelor, B. and Montani, L., ‘Exhaustion, essential subject matter and other CJEU judicial tools to update copyright for an online economy’, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 10 (2015), 591CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Batikas, M., Gomez-Herrera, E. and Martens, B., ‘Geographic Fragmentation in the EU Market for e-Books: The case of Amazon’, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Digital Economy Working Paper 2015/13Google Scholar

Bently, L., ‘Harmonization By Stealth: Copyright and the ECJ’, (Fordham IP Conference, 2010): http://fordhamipconference.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Bently_Harmonization.pdfGoogle Scholar

Besen, S. and Kirby, S. N., Compensating Creators of Intellectual Property (RAND Corp, 1989)Google Scholar

Besen, S. M., Kirby, S. N. and Salop, S. C., ‘An Economic Analysis of Copyright Collectives’, Virginia Law Review, 78 (1992), 383CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, J., ‘Critical reflections on regulation’, Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation, London School of Economics and Political Science (2002): eprints.lse.ac.uk/35985Google Scholar

Blomqvist, J., Primer on International Copyright and Related Rights (Edward Elgar, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonadio, E., ‘Collective management of music copyright in the Internet age and the EU initiatives: From reciprocal representation agreements to open platforms’ World Library and Information Congress, Helsinki, 2012: www.ifla.org/past-wlic/2012/148-bonadio-en.pdfGoogle Scholar

Brinker, I. and Holzmuller, T., ‘Competition law and copyright – observations from the world of collecting societies’, European Intellectual Property Review, 32 (2010) 553Google Scholar

Bundesverband Informationswirtschaft Telekommunikation und Neue Medien e.V. (bitkom), ‘Stellungnahme zum Regierungsentwurf eines Verwertungsgesellschaftengesetzes (VGG)’ (Berlin: 14 January 2016)Google Scholar

Bureau Européen des Unions de Consommateurs (BEUC), ‘Collective Management of Copyright and Related Rights and Multi-territorial Licensing of Rights in Musical Works for Online, Proposal for a Directive’, Ref.: X/2013/001 (Brussels, 08 January 2013): https://ameliaandersdotter.eu/sites/default/files/beuc_-_crm.pdfGoogle Scholar

Capobianco, A., ‘Licensing of Music Rights: Media Convergence and EC Competition Law’, European Intellectual Property Review, 26 (2004), 113Google Scholar

Caroll, M. W., ‘A Realist Approach to Copyright Law’s Formalities’, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 28 (2013), 1511Google Scholar

Castets-Renard, C., ‘“Digital Single Market”: The European Commission presents its first measures in Copyright Law’ (2016) French Review: Recueil Dalloz, 2016, n° 7, p. 388 (forthcoming): http://ssrn.com/abstract=2802729Google Scholar

Chittenden, F., Abler, T. and Xiao, D., ‘Impact Assessment in the EU’ in Weatherill, S. (ed.), Better Regulation: Studies of the Oxford Institute of European and Comparative Law, vol. 6 (Hart Publishing, 2007)Google Scholar

Clark, R., ‘Exhaustion, geographical licensing restrictions and transfer prohibitions: Two surprising decisions’, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 8 (2013), 460CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coase, R. H., ‘The Nature of the Firm’, Economica (1937), 386–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coase, R. H., ‘The Problem of Social Cost’, Journal of Law and Economics, 3 (1960), 1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cole, M., ‘PRSfM/STIM/GEMA/JV: Multijurisdictional Licencing for Music Streaming’, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 7 (2016), 257CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colomo, P. I., ‘The Commission Investigation into Pay TV Services: Open Questions’, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 5 (2014), 531CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colomo, P. I. , ‘Copyright Licensing and the EU Digital Single Market Strategy’ (2015) LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers 19/2015: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2697178Google Scholar

Colomo, P. I. , ‘Copyright reform through competition law? The Commission’s statement of objections in the pay TV investigation’ (Chillin’Competition, 24 July 2015): https://chillingcompetition.com/2015/07/24/copyright-reform-through-competition-law-the-commissions-statement-of-objections-in-the-pay-tv-investigation/Google Scholar

Crampes, C. and Hollander, A., ‘The regulation of audiovisual content: Quotas and conflicting objectives’, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 34 (2008), 195CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cryer, R., Hervey, T. and Sokhi-Bulley, B., Research Methodologies in EU and International Law (Hart Publishing, 2011)Google Scholar

Danaher, B. and Waldfogel, J., ‘Reel Piracy: The Effect of Online Film Piracy on International Box Office Sales’, University of Minnesota and NBER (2012): http://ssrn.com/abstract=1986299Google Scholar

Dang Nguyen, G., Dejean, S. and Moreau, F., ‘Are Streaming and Other Music Consumption Modes Substitutes or Complements?’: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2025071Google Scholar

David, P. A., ‘Why are institutions the “carriers of history”?: Path dependence and the evolution of conventions, organizations and institutions’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 5 (1994), 205CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Búrca, G. and Scott, J., ‘New Governance, Law and Constitutionalism’ (2006): www.ucl.ac.uk/laws/clge/docs/govlawconst.pdfGoogle Scholar

de Vries, S., ‘Sport, TV and IP rights: Premier League and Karen Murphy’, Common Market Law Review, 50 (2013), 591CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dehin, V., ‘The Future of Legal Online Music Services in the European Union: A Review of the EU Commission’s Recent Initiatives in Cross-Border Copyright Management’, European Intellectual Property Review, 32 (2010), 220Google Scholar

Di Porto, F. and Drexl, J., ‘Preface’ in Di Porto, F. and Drexl, J. (eds.), Competition Law as Regulation (Edward Elgar, 2015)Google Scholar

Doukas, D., ‘The Sky is not the (only) limit: Sports broadcasting without frontiers and the Court of Justice: Comment on Murphy’, 37 European Law Review (2012), 605Google Scholar

Dreier, T., ‘Regulating competition by way of copyright limitation and exceptions’ in Torremans, P. (ed.), Copyright Law, A Handbook of Contemporary Research (Edward Elgar, 2007)Google Scholar

Dreier, T. , ‘Online and Its Effect on the “Goods” versus “Services” Distinction’, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 44 (2013), 137CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drexl, J., ‘Competition in the field of collective management: Preferring “creative competition” to allocative efficiency in European copyright law’ in Torremans, P. (ed.), Copyright Law, A Handbook of Contemporary Research (Edward Elgar, 2007)Google Scholar

Drexl, J. , ‘Collective Management of Copyrights and the EU Principle of Free Movement of Services after the OSA Judgment – In Favour of a More Balanced Approach’ in Purnhagen, K. and Rott, P. (eds.), Varieties of European Economic Law and Regulation, Liber Amicorum for Hans Micklitz, vol. 3 (Springer, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drexl, J. and others, ‘Comments of the Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law on the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Collective Management of Copyright and Related Rights’, Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law Research Paper No. 13–04 (2012): http://ssrn.com/abstract=2208971Google Scholar

Dunne, N., Competition Law and Economic Regulation, Making and Managing Markets (Cambridge University Press, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dusollier, S., ‘The relations between copyright law and consumers’ rights from a European perspective’, Directorate General for Internal Policies; Policy Department C: Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs, No PE 432.742 (2010): http://ssrn.com/abstract=2127736Google Scholar

Enser, J., ‘Another consultation from Brussels- anyone for SatCab?’ (IP Kat, 27 August 2015): http://the1709blog.blogspot.dk/2015/08/another-consultation-from-brussels.htmlGoogle Scholar

European Broadcasting Union (EBU), ‘EBU Welcomes Steps to Update EU Cable and Satellite Directive for the Digital Age’ (EBU, 26 August 2015): www.ebu.ch/news/2015/08/ebu-welcomes-steps-to-update-euGoogle Scholar

European Broadcasting Union (EBU) , ‘Satellite and Cable Licensing Solutions: The Key to Enhancing Cross-border Access to Online TV and Radio Content’ EBU (9 December 2015): www.ebu.ch/news/2015/12/satellite-and-cable-directive-liGoogle Scholar

Fagerjord, A., ‘After Convergence: YouTube and Remix Culture’ in Hunsinger, J., Klastrup, L. and Allen, M. (eds.), International Handbook of Internet Research (Springer, 2010)Google Scholar

Fahey, E., ‘Does the Emperor Have Financial Crisis Clothes? Reflections on the Legal Basis of the European Banking Authority’, Modern Law Review (2011): ssrn.com/abstract=1715524Google Scholar

Farrand, B., Networks of power in digital copyright law and policy (Routledge, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farrand, B. , ‘The EU Portability Regulation: One small step for cross-border access, one giant leap for Commission copyright policy?’, European Intellectual Property Review, 38 (2016), 321Google Scholar

Favale, M., Kretschmer, M. and Torremans, P. C., ‘Is there an EU Copyright Jurisprudence? An Empirical Analysis of the Workings of the European Court of Justice’, Modern Law Review, 79 (2016), 31–75: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2643699CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ficsor, M., ‘Collective Management and Multi-territorial Licensing: Key Issues of the Transposition of Directive 2014/26/EU’ in I. A. Stamatoudi, (ed.), New Developments in EU and International Copyright Law (Kluwer Law International, 2016)Google Scholar

Gaster, J., ‘Das urheberrechtliche Territorialitätsprinzip aus Sicht des Europäischen Gemeinschaftsrechts’, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht (2016) 8Google Scholar

Geiger, C. (ed.), The construction of intellectual property in the European Union: searching for coherence (Edward Elgar, 2013)Google Scholar

Geiger, C. and others, ‘Declaration, A Balanced Interpretation of the “Three-Step Test” in Copyright Law’, Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, (2010) 119Google Scholar

Geiger, C. , ‘Moving out of the economic crisis: What role and shape for intellectual property rights in the European Union?’ in Kalimo, H. and Jansson, M. S. (eds.), EU Economic Law in a Time of Crisis (Edward Elgar, 2016)Google Scholar

George, L. M. and Peukert, C., ‘YouTube Decade: Cultural Convergence in Recorded Music’, NET Institute, Working Paper #14–11 (2014): http://ssrn.com/abstract=2506357Google Scholar

Gervais, D., ‘Collective Management: Theory and Practice in the Digital Age’ in Gervais, D. (ed.), Collective Management of Copyright and Related Rights, 2nd edn. (Wolters Kluwer, 2010)Google Scholar

Gervais, D. , ‘Keynote: The Landscape of Collective Management Schemes’, Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 34 (2011), 423Google Scholar

Gervais, D. and Maurushat, A., ‘Fragmented Copyright, Fragmented Management: Proposals to Defrag Copyright Management’, Canadian Journal of Law and Technology, 2 (2003), 15Google Scholar

GESAC, ‘Collective Rights Management in Europe – our thoughts on the road ahead’ (Brussels, February 2013)Google Scholar

Ghafele, R., ‘Europe’s Lost Royalty Opportunity: A Comparison of Potential and Existing Digital Music Royalty Markets in Ten Different E.U. Member States’, Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 11 (2014), 60Google Scholar

Gilliéron, P., ‘Collecting Societies and the Digital Environment’, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law (2006) 939Google Scholar

Ginsburg, J. C., ‘From Having Copies to Experiencing Works: The Development of an Access Right in U.S. Copyright Law’ (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ginsburg, J. C. , ‘“European Copyright Code” – Back to First Principles (with Some Additional Detail)’ Columbia Public Law & Legal Theory Working Papers 9193: http://lsr.nellco.org/columbia_pllt/9193Google Scholar

Ginsburg, J. C. , ‘Authors’ transfer and license contracts under U.S. copyright law’ in de Werra, J. (ed.), Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Licensing, ch. 1 (Edward Elgar, 2013)Google Scholar

Gómez, A. M. P. and Arcila, M. A. E., ‘Collective administration of online rights in musical works: Analysing the economic efficiency of Directive 2014/26/EU’, International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 7 (2014), 103CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gomez-Herrera, E. and Martens, B., ‘Language, Copyright and Geographic Segmentation in the EU Digital Single Market for Music and Films’ (2015) Digital Economy Working Paper 2015–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graber, C. B., ‘Collective rights management, competition policy and cultural diversity: EU lawmaking at a crossroads’, World Intellectual Property Organization Journal, 4 (2012), 35Google Scholar

Greeley, K., ‘Recommendations, Communications, and Directives, oh my: How the European Union isn’t solving its licensing problem’, Georgetown Journal of International Law, 44 (2013), 1523Google Scholar

Greenberg, J., ‘For Netflix, Discontent over Blocked VPNs is Boiling’ (WIRED, 3 July 2016): www.wired.com/2016/03/netflix-discontent-blocked-vpns-boiling/Google Scholar

Guibault, L., ‘The Draft Collective Management Directive’ in Stamatoudi, I. A. and Torremans, P. (eds.), EU Copyright Law: A Commentary (Edward Elgar, 2014)Google Scholar

Guibault, L. , ‘Individual Licensing Models and Consumer Protection’, Amsterdam Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2016–01 (2016): http://ssrn.com/abstract=2713765Google Scholar

Guibault, L. and Quintais, J. P., ‘Copyright, technology and the exploitation of audiovisual works in the EU’, (2014) Iris plus, 7Google Scholar

Guibault, L. and van Gompel, S., ‘Collective Management in the European Union’ in Gervais, D. (ed.), Collective Management of Copyright and Related Rights, 2nd edn. (Kluwer Law International, 2010)Google Scholar

Gurry, Francis, ‘2013 Address by the Director General’ WIPO Assemblies – September 23 to October 2, 2013: www.wipo.int/about-wipo/en/dgo/speeches/a_51_dg_speech.htmlGoogle Scholar

Gyertyánfy, P., ‘Collective Management of Music Rights in Europe after the CISAC Decision’, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law (2010) 59Google Scholar

Handke, C., ‘Collective administration’ in Watt, R. (ed.), Handbook on the Economics of Copyright (Edward Elgar, 2014)Google Scholar

Handke, C. , ‘Joint Copyright Management by Collecting Societies and Online Platforms: An Economic Analysis’: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2616442Google Scholar

Handke, C., Quintais, J. P. and Balazs, B., ‘The Economics of Copyright Compensation Systems for Digital Use’ (SERCI Annual Congress 2013, Paris, July 2013)Google Scholar

Handke, C. and Towse, R., ‘Economics of Copyright Collecting Societies’ (2007): http://ssrn.com/abstract=1159085Google Scholar

Hansen, G. and Schmidt-Bischoffshausen, A., Economic functions of collecting societies – Collective rights management in the light of transaction cost- and information economics (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hilty, R. M., ‘Individual, multiple and collective ownership: What impact on competition?’ in Rosén, J. (ed.), Individualism and Collectiveness in Intellectual Property Law (Edward Elgar, 2012)Google Scholar

Hilty, R. M. and Köklü, K., ‘Limitations and Exceptions to Copyright in the Digital Age’ in Stamatoudi, I. A. (ed.), New Developments in EU and International Copyright Law (Kluwer Law International, 2016)Google Scholar

Hilty, R. M. and Li, T., ‘Control Mechanisms for CRM Systems and Competition Law’ (2016) Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition Research Paper No. 16–04 (Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition): http://ssrn.com/abstract=2772482Google Scholar

Hilty, R. M. and Nérisson, S., ‘Collective Copyright Management and Digitization: The European Experience’ (2013) Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law Research Paper No. 13–09 (Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law): http://ssrn.com/abstract=2247870Google Scholar

Hoeren, T., Collecting societies and cultural diversity in the music sector (2009)Google Scholar

Hoeren, T. and Altemark, C., ‘Musikverwertungsgesellschaften und das Urheberrechtswahrnehmungsgesetz am Beispiel der CELAS’ Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht (2010) 16Google Scholar

Hollander, A., ‘Market structure and performance in intellectual property’, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2 (1984), 199CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hugenholtz, P. B., ‘Harmonization or Unification of EU Copyright Law’ in Axhamn, J. (ed.), Copyright in a Borderless Online Environment (Norsteds Juriidik, 2012)Google Scholar

Hugenholtz, P. B. , ‘Audiovisual Archives across Borders – Dealing with Territorially Restricted Copyright’ IRIS Special 49 (2010)Google Scholar

Hugenholtz, P. B. , ‘Harmonisation or Unification of European Union Copyright Law’, Monash University Law Review, 38 (2012), 4Google Scholar

Hugenholtz, P. B. , ‘Extending the SatCab Model to the Internet’ Study commissioned by BEUC (Brussels, 2015)Google Scholar

Hunt, J. and Shaw, J., ‘Fairy Tale of Luxembourg? Reflections on Law and Legal Scholarship in European Integration’ in Phinnemore, D. and Warleigh-Lack, A. (eds.), Reflections on European Integration, 50 Years of the Treaty of Rome (Palgrave Macmillan, 2009)Google Scholar

Hviid, M., Schroff, S. and Street, J., ‘Regulating CMOs by competition: an incomplete answer to the licensing problem?’ (2016) CREATe Working Paper 2016/03 (March 2016)Google Scholar

International Copyright Enterprise (ICE), ‘Response, Global Repertoire Database Request for Information’ (2010)Google Scholar

Kalimo, H., Olkkonen, K. and Vaario, J., ‘EU intellectual property rights law – driving innovation or stifling the Digital Single Market?’ in Kalimo, H. and Jansson, M. S. (eds.), EU Economic Law in a Time of Crisis (Edward Elgar, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katz, A., ‘The potential demise of another natural monopoly: Rethinking the collective administration of performing rights’, Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 1 (2005), 541CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katz, A. , ‘The potential demise of another natural monopoly: New technologies and the administration of performing rights’, Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 2 (2006), 245CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katz, B. G., ‘Territorial Exclusivity in the Soft Drink Industry’, Journal of Industrial Economics, 27 (1978), 85CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kautio, T., Lefever, N. and Määttä, M., Assessing the Operation of Copyright and Related Rights Systems, Methodology Framework (Foundation for Cultural Policy Research (Cupore publication 26 2016)Google Scholar

Kay, A., ‘A critique of the use of path dependency in policy studies’, Public Administration, 83 (2005), 553CrossRefGoogle Scholar

KEA European Affairs, The Collective Management of Rights in Europe: The Quest for Efficiency (Study commissioned by the European Commission, 2006)Google Scholar

KEA European Affairs , Licensing music works and transaction costs in Europe (2012)Google Scholar

KEA European Affairs and Mines ParisTech, Multi-Territory Licensing of Audiovisual Works in the European Union (Final Report prepared for the European Commission, DG Information Society and Media, 2010)Google Scholar

Keller, P., ‘Copyright Communication: The good, the bad, and the ugly’ (COMMUNIA Association, 10 December 2015): www.communia-association.org/2015/12/10/copyright-communication-commission-communiaction-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/Google Scholar

Kennedy, D., ‘The Mystery of Global Governance’ in Dunoff, J. L. and Trachtman, J. P. (eds.), Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Kivistö, M., ‘Multi-territorial online licensing in the light of Title III of the Directive on collective rights management’, Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättskydd (2015) 706Google Scholar

Klabbers, J., ‘Law-making and Constitutionalism’ in Klabbers, J., Peters, A. and Ulfstein, G. (eds.), The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

KODA, ‘Creative Commons nu i Danmark’ KODA (Copenhagen, 24 January 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

KODA (Hüttel, Jakob), ‘The CISAC Case & the 2005 Recommendation’ FEMR, Sophienberg, 24 April 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kretschmer, M., ‘Access and Reward in the Information Society: Regulating the Collective Management of Copyright’ (2007) CIPPM Working Paper 2007: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2739837CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kretschmer, M. , ‘The Failure of Property Rules in Collective Administration: Rethinking Copyright Societies as Regulatory Instruments’, European Intellectual Property Review (2002) 126Google Scholar

Kretschmer, T. and Peukert, C., ‘Video Killed the Radio Star? Online Music Videos and Digital Music Sales’ (2015): http://ssrn.com/abstract=2425386Google Scholar

Lamadrid, A., ‘Breaking news: Pay-TV investigation- Paramount offers commitments’ (Chillin’Competition, 22 April 2016): https://chillingcompetition.com/2016/04/22/breaking-news-pay-tv-investigation-paramount-offers-commitments/Google Scholar

Langenius, C., ‘The ramifications of pan-European licensing for Nordic collective rights management’, Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättskydd (2008) 29Google Scholar

Langus, G., Neven, D. and Pouken, S., Economic Analysis of the Territoriality of the Making Available Right in the EU (Report prepared for the European Commission, DG MARKT, 2014)Google Scholar

Lessig, L., ‘The New Chicago School’, Journal of Legal Studies, XXVII (1998), 661CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liebowitz, S. J. and Watt, R., ‘How to best ensure remuneration for creators in the market for music? Copyright and its alternatives’, Journal of Economic Surveys, 20 (2006), 513CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindholm, J. and Kaburakis, A., ‘Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08 FA Premier League Ltd and Others v QC Leisure and Others; and Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd, 4 Oct 2011’ in Andersen, J. (ed.), Leading Cases in Sports Law (Springer, 2013)Google Scholar

Liu, W., ‘Models for Collective Management of Copyright from an International Perspective: Potential Changes for Enhancing Performance’, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (2012), 46Google Scholar

Lüder, T., ‘First experience with EU wide online music licensing’, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Internationaler Teil (2007), 649Google Scholar

Maasø, A., User-centric settlement for music streaming; A report on the distribution of income from music streaming in Norway, based on streaming data from WiMP Music (Clouds & Concerts research group, University of Oslo, 2014)Google Scholar

Marchegiani, L., ‘Le licenze multiterritoriali per l’uso online di opere musicali nella disciplina comunitaria della gestione collettiva dei diritti d’autore e dei diritti connessi’, Osservatorio del diritto civile e commerciale, 2 (2013), 293Google Scholar

Martin-Prat, M., ‘The Future of Copyright in Europe’, Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 38 (2014), 29Google Scholar

Matulionytė, R., ‘Cross-Border Collective Management and Principle of Territoriality: Problems and Possible Solutions in the EU’, Journal of World Intellectual Property, 11 (2009), 467CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property, Competition and Tax Law, ‘Stellungnahme des Max-Planck-Instituts für Geistiges Eigentum, Wettbewerbs- und Steuerrecht zuhanden des Bundesministeriums der Justiz betreffend die Empfehlung der Europäischen Kommission über die Lizenzierung von Musik für das Internet vom 18. Oktober 2005 (2005/737/EG)’ (2006): www.ip.mpg.de/fileadmin/ipmpg/content/stellungnahmen/stellungnahme-lizenzierungmusik1_01.pdfGoogle Scholar

Mazziotti, G., ‘New Licensing Models for Online Music Services in the European Union: From Collective to Customized Management’ Public Law & Legal Theory Working Paper Group Paper Number 11–269, Columbia Law School: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1814264Google Scholar

Mazziotti, G. , ‘Is geo-blocking a real cause for concern?’, European Intellectual Property Review, 38 (2016) 365Google Scholar

Merges, R. P., ‘Contracting into Liability Rules: Intellectual Property Rights and Collective Rights Organizations’, California Law Review, 84 (1996), 1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mestmäcker, E.-J., ‘Collecting Societies’ in Ehlermann, C.-D. (ed.), The Interaction between Competition Law and Intellectual Property Law, European Competition Law Annual, 2nd edn. (Hart Publishing, 2005)Google Scholar

Metzger, A. and Heinemann, T., ‘The Right of the Author to Grant Licenses for Non-Commercial Use: Creative Commons Licenses and the Directive on Collective Management’, Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, 6 (2015), 11Google Scholar

Milosic, K., ‘The Failure of the Global Repertoire Database’ (Hypebot, 31 August 2015): www.hypebot.com/hypebot/2015/08/the-failure-of-the-global-repertoire-database-effort-draft.htmlGoogle Scholar

Morrison, A., ‘European Commission’s draft Geo-Blocking Regulation fails to clear the way’ (King & Wood Mallesons), 21 June 2016: www.kwm.com/en/uk/knowledge/insights/european-commissions-draft-geo-blocking-regulation-fails-to-clear-the-way-20160621Google Scholar

Motta, M., Rey, P. and Vettas, N., Hardcore restrictions under the Block Exemption Regulation on vertical agreements: An economic view (2009)Google Scholar

NCB, ‘Buma/Stemra teams up with ICE and NMP for online administration services’ Press release (Copenhagen, 3 December 2014)Google Scholar

Nérisson, S., ‘Has Collective Management of Copyright Run Its Course? Not So Fast’, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law (2015), 505CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ohly, A., ‘Geoblocking zwischen Wirtschafts-, Kultur-, Verbraucher- und Europapolitik’, Zeitschrift für Urheber-und Medienrecht (2015) 942Google Scholar

Papadopoulos, Y., ‘Problems of Democratic Accountability in Network and Multi-Level Governance’, European Law Journal, 13 (2007), 469CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peczenik, A. (ed.), Legal Doctrine and Legal Theory, vol. 4, ‘Scientia’ (Springer, 2005)Google Scholar

Peifer, K.-N., ‘Umsetzung der EU-Richtlinie für Verwertungsgesellschaften in deutsches Recht, Umsetzungsbedarf aus wissenschaftlicher Sicht’, Zeitschrift für Urheber-und Medienrecht (2014) 453Google Scholar

Peitz, M. and Waelbroeck, P., ‘An Economist’s Guide to Digital Music’ (2004) CESifo Working Paper No. 1333: cesifo.oxfordjournals.org/content/51/2–3/359.full.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perlmutter, S., ‘Making Copyright Work for a Global Market: Policy Revision on Both Sides of the Atlantic’, Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts (2014), 49, 49Google Scholar

Peters, A., ‘Membership in the Global Constitutional Community’ in Klabbers, J., A. Peters, G. Ulfstein, (eds.), The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Petteri, G., ‘Harmonising Collective Rights Management and Multi-Territorial Licensing of Music for Online Use in the European Union: A Review of the Collective Rights Management Directive 2014/26/EU’, Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättskydd (2015) 150Google Scholar

Peukert, A., ‘Territoriality and Extraterritoriality in Intellectual Property Law’ in Handl, G., Zekoll, J. and Zumbansen, P. (eds.), Beyond Territoriality: Transnational Legal Authority in an Age of Globalization (Brill Academic Publishing, 2012): http://ssrn.com/abstract=1592263Google Scholar

Pierre, J., ‘Introduction: Understanding Governance’ in Pierre, J. (ed.), Debating Governance (Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar

Plucinska, J., ‘Leak: The Commission’s latest geo-blocking plans’ (POLITICO, 9 May 2016): www.politico.eu/pro/geoblocking-ecommerce-european-commission-leak-eu/Google Scholar

POLARIS Nordic, ‘Ground breaking initiative: Cross-border alliance lead the way for future rights management’, Press release (3 February 2014)Google Scholar

Poll, G., ‘CELAS, PEDL & Co.: Metamorphose oder Anfang vom Ende der kollektiven Wahrnehmung von Musik-Online-Rechten in Europa?’, Zeitschrift für Urheber-und Medienrecht (2008) 500Google Scholar

Posner, R. A., ‘Intellectual Property: The Law and Economics Approach’, Journal of Economics Perspectives, 19 (2005), 57CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Posner, R. A. , ‘Transaction Costs and Antitrust Concerns in the Licensing of Intellectual Property’, John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law, 4 (2005), 325Google Scholar

Quintais, J. P., ‘The Empire Strikes Back: CISAC beats Commission in General Court’, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 8 (2013), 680CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quintais, J. P. , ‘Proposal for a Directive on collective rights management and (some) multi-territorial licensing’, European Intellectual Property Review, 35 (2013), 65Google Scholar

Ramachandran, S., ‘Netflix Says Push for Global Rights “Has Not Been an Easy Road”’, The Wall Street Journal (7 December 2015): www.wsj.com/articles/netflix-says-push-for-global-rights-has-not-been-an-easy-road-1449508613Google Scholar

Reinbothe, J., ‘Collective Rights Management in Germany’ in Gervais, D. (ed.), Collective Management of Copyright and Related Rights, 2nd edn. (Kluwer Law International, 2010)Google Scholar

Rethink Music, ‘Fair Music: Transparency and Payment Flows in the Music Industry, Recommendations to Increase Transparency, Reduce Friction, and Promote Fairness in the Music Industry’ (2015) Rethink Music, Berklee ICE, Boston: www.rethink-music.com/research/fair-music-transparency-and-payment-flows-in-the-music-industryGoogle Scholar

Riccio, G. M. and Codiglione, G., ‘Copyright Collecting Societies, Monopolistic Positions and Competition in the EU Single Market’, Masaryk Journal of Law and Technology, 7 (2013), 287Google Scholar

Ricolfi, M., ‘Individual and collective management of copyright in a digital environment’ in Torremans, P. (ed.), Copyright Law, A Handbook of Contemporary Research (Edward Elgar, 2007)Google Scholar

Ricolfi, M. , ‘Collective Rights Management in a Digital Environment’ in Ghidini, G. and Genovesi, L. M. (eds.), Intellectual Property and Market Power, ATRIP Papers 2006–2007 (Eudeba, 2008)Google Scholar

Ricolfi, M. , ‘Consume and share: Making copyright fit for the digital agenda’ in Geiger, C. (ed.), Constructing European Intellectual Property, Achievements and New Perspectives (Edward Elgar, 2013)Google Scholar

Ricolfi, M. , ‘The new paradigm of creativity and innovation and its corollaries for the law of obligations’ in Drahos, P., Ghidini, G. and Ullrich, H. (eds.), Kritika: Essays on Intellectual Property (Edward Elgar, 2015)Google Scholar

Riis, T., ‘Collecting societies, competition, and the Services Directive’, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 6 (2011), 482CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riis, T. , ‘Ophavsrettens fleksibilitet’, Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättskydd (2012) 139Google Scholar

Riis, T. , ‘User generated law: Re-constructing intellectual property law in a knowledge society’ in Riis, T. (ed.), User Generated Law, Re-Constructing Intellectual Property Law in a Knowledge Society (Edward Elgar, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riis, T. and Schovsbo, J., ‘Den grænseløse onlinebruger – geografisk opdeling af markedet for online- og streamingtjenester’ in Liber Amicorum Jan Rosén (eddy.se 2016)Google Scholar

Rochelandet, F., ‘Are copyright collecting societies efficient? An evaluation of collective administration of copyright in Europe’ (The Society for Economic Research on Copyright Issues, Inaugural Annual Congress, Madrid, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rognstad, O.-A., ‘The multiplicity of territorial IP rights and its impact on competition’ in Rosén, J. (ed.), Individualism and Collectiveness in Intellectual Property Law (Edward Elgar, 2012)Google Scholar

Rognstad, O.-A. , ‘Legally Flawed but Politically Sound? Digital Exhaustion of Copyright in Europe after UsedSoft’, Oslo Law Review, 3 (2014), 1Google Scholar

Rognstad, O.-A. , ‘The CJEU’s Recent Findings on Digital Exhaustion and Linking and their Impact on Nordic Copyright Law’, Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättskydd (2015) 624Google Scholar

Rognstad, O.-A. , ‘Restructuring the Economic Rights in Copyright – Some Reflections on an “Alternative Model”’, Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA, 62 (2015), 503Google Scholar

Rosati, E., ‘Online copyright exhaustion in a post-Allposters world’ forthcoming in Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2613608Google Scholar

Rosati, E. , ‘The Digital Single Market Strategy: Too many (strategic?) omissions’ (IPKat, 7 May 2015): http://ipkitten.blogspot.dk/2015/05/the-digital-single-market-strategy-too.htmlGoogle Scholar

Rosati, E. , ‘Geoblocking: is the end in sight through … competition law? Possibly not’ (IPKat, 23 April 2016): http://ipkitten.blogspot.dk/2016/04/geoblocking-is-end-in-sight-through.htmlGoogle Scholar

Rosati, E. , ‘BREAKING: Report on responses to Public Consultation on EU copyright now available’ (IP Kat, 23 July 2014): http://ipkitten.blogspot.dk/2014/07/breaking-report-on-responses-to-public.htmlGoogle Scholar

Ross, A., ‘The new regulatory regime for collective rights management – the Government consults on how to implement’, Entertainment Law Review, 26 (2015), 130Google Scholar

Rotondo, E., ‘Three in One–Online: Collecting society joint venture cleared by the Commission’, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 11 (2016), 16CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samuelson, P., ‘Should Economics Play a Role in Copyright Law and Policy?’, University of Ottawa Law & Technology Journal, 1 (2004), 1Google Scholar

Savič, M., ‘The CJEU AllPosters Case: Beginning of the End of Digital Exhaustion?’ European Intellectual Property Review, 37 (2015), 389Google Scholar

Savin, A., ‘The Commission’s New Proposals on the Digital Single Market, May 2016’ (EU Internet Law & Policy Blog, 25 March 2016): https://euinternetpolicy.wordpress.com/2016/05/25/the-commissions-new-proposals-on-the-digital-single-market-may-2016/Google Scholar

Schovsbo, J., Grænsefladespørgsmål mellem immaterialretten og konkurrenceretten (Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag, 1996)Google Scholar

Schovsbo, J. , ‘The Necessity to collectivize copyright – and dangers thereof’ (2010): http://ssrn.com/abstract=1632753Google Scholar

Schwemer, S. F., ‘The licensing of online music streaming services in Europe’ in Watt, R. (ed.), Handbook on the Economics of Copyright (Edward Elgar, 2014)Google Scholar

Schwemer, S. F. , ‘Emerging models for cross-border online licensing’ in Riis, T. (ed.), User Generated Law, Re-Constructing Intellectual Property Law in a Knowledge Society (Edward Elgar, 2016)Google Scholar

Schwemer, S. F. , ‘Geoblocking: im Visier der EU Kommission’ (HIIG Blog, 13. November 2015): www.hiig.de/blog/geoblocking-im-visier-der-eu-kommission/Google Scholar

Schwemer, S. F. , ‘The way forward to the Collective Rights Management Directive’ (The 1709 Blog, 25 February 2014): http://the1709blog.blogspot.dk/2014/02/way-forward-to-collective-rights.htmlGoogle Scholar

Schwemer, S. F. , ‘Kollektiv forvaltning i informationssamfundet og det nye regime under direktivet 2014/26/EU i Danmark’, Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättskydd (2015) 697Google Scholar

Senftleben, M. and others, ‘The Recommendation on Measures to Safeguard Fundamental Rights and the Open Internet in the Framework of the EU Copyright Reform’ (2017): https://ssrn.com/abstract=3054967Google Scholar

Shapiro, T., ‘The proposed regulation on Portability – don’t leave home without it’, Entertainment Law Review, 27 (2016), 351Google Scholar

Simon, W. H., ‘Toyota Jurisprudence: Legal Theory and Rolling Rule Regimes’ in de Búrca, G. and Scott, J. (eds.), Law and Governance in the EU and the US (Hart Publishing, 2006)Google Scholar

Stalla-Bourdillon, S. and others, ‘Open Letter to the European Commission – On the Importance of Preserving the Consistency and Integrity of the EU Acquis Relating to Content Monitoring within the Information Society’ (2016): https://ssrn.com/abstract=2850483Google Scholar

Steyn, E., ‘Collective rights management: Multi-territorial licensing and self-regulation’, Entertainment Law Review, 25 (2014), 143Google Scholar

Stokkmo, O., ‘The EU Collective Rights Management Directive and the RRO’, International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 7 (2014), 120CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Street, J., Laing, D., and Schroff, S., ‘Regulating for creativity and cultural diversity: The case of collective management organisations and the music industry’, International Journal of Cultural PolicyGoogle Scholar

Strowel, A. and Vanbrabant, B., “Copyright licensing: A European view” in de Werra, J. (ed.), Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Licensing (Edward Elgar, 2013)Google Scholar

Stupp, C., ‘Commission wants consumers to access digital content when they travel’ (EurActiv, 9 December 2015): www.euractiv.com/section/digital/news/commission-wants-consumers-to-access-digital-content-when-they-travel/Google Scholar

Szyszczak, E., ‘Current Intelligence Karen Murphy: Decoding Licences and Territorial Exclusivity’, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice (2011) 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

te Hacken, P., ‘Terms and specialized vocabulary. Taming the prototype’ in Kockaert, H. J. and Steurs, F. (eds.), Handbook of Terminology, vol. 1 (Jon Bejamins Publishing Co., 2015)Google Scholar

Thomes, T. P., ‘An economic analysis of online streaming: How the music industry can generate revenues from cloud computing’ (2011) ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research, Discussion Paper No. 11–039: http://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp11039.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torremans, P., ‘Questioning the principles of territoriality: The determination of territorial mechanisms of commercialisation’ in Torremans, P. (ed.), Copyright Law, A Handbook of Contemporary Research (Edward Elgar, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torremans, P. , ‘The Future Implications of the Usedsoft Decision’ CREATe Working Paper 2014/2 (February 2014): www.create.ac.uk/publications/wp000012Google Scholar

Towse, R., ‘Economics of collective management organisations in the creative industries’ (WINIR conference, 4–6 April 2016)Google Scholar

Towse, R. , ‘Economics of copyright collecting societies and digital rights: Is there a case for a centralised digital copyright exchange?’, Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 9 (2012), 3Google Scholar

Towse, R., Handke, C. and Stepan, P., ‘The Economics of Copyright Law: A Stocktake of the Literature’, Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 5 (2008), 1Google Scholar

Train, K. E., Optimal Regulation: The Economic Theory of Natural Monopoly, 3rd edn. (MIT Press, 1994)Google Scholar

Trimble, M., ‘The Territoriality Referendum’, World Intellectual Property Organization Journal (2014) 89Google Scholar

Trubek, D. M., Cottrell, P. and Nance, M., ‘“Soft Law”, “Hard Law” and EU Integration’ in de Búrca, G. and Scott, J. (eds.), Law and Governance in the EU and the US (Hart Publishing, 2006)Google Scholar

Tryggvadóttir, R., ‘Balancing of Interests and Cross-border Use. Room for Nordic Co-operation?’, Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättskydd (2015) 652Google Scholar

van Eechoud, M. and others, Harmonizing European Copyright Law, The Challenges of Better Lawmaking, vol. 19, Information Law Series (Hugenholtz, P. B. (ed.), Wolters Kluwer, 2009)Google Scholar

van Gestel, R. and Micklitz, H.-W., ‘Revitalizing Doctrinal Legal Research in Europe: What About Methodology?’ in Neergaard, U., Nielsen, R. and Roseberry, L. (eds.), European Legal Method – Pardoxes and Revitalisation (DJØF Publishing, 2011)Google Scholar

van Gompel, S., ‘Copyright Formalities in the Internet Age: Filters of Protection or Facilitators of Licensing’, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 28 (2013), 1425Google Scholar

Vestager, Margrethe, ‘Competition policy for the Digital Single Market: Focus on e-commerce’ (Bundeskartellamt International Conference on Competition, Berlin, 26 March 2015): http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-15–4704_en.htmGoogle Scholar

Vestager, Margrethe , ‘Intellectual property and competition’ (19th IBA Competition Conference, Florence, 11 September 2015): http://ec.europa.eu/commission/2014–2019/vestager/announcements/intellectual-property-and-competition_enGoogle Scholar

von Albrecht, M., Mutschler-Siebert, A. and Bosch, T., ‘Die Murphy-Entscheidung und ihre Auswirkungen auf Sport- und Filmlizenzen im Online-Bereich, Die exklusive territoriale Rechtevergabe ist kein Modell der Vergangenheit!’, Zeitschrift für Urheber-und Medienrecht (2012) 93Google Scholar

Vuckovic, R. M., ‘Implementation of Directive 2014/26 on collective management and multi-territorial licensing of musical rights in regulating the tariff-setting systems in Central and Eastern Europe’, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 47 (2016), 28CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walker, N., ‘EU Constitutionalism and New Governance’ in de Búrca, G. and Scott, J. (eds.), Law and New Governance in the EU and the US (Hart Publishing, 2006)Google Scholar

Watt, R., Copyright and economic theory: friends or foes? (Edward Elgar, 2000)Google Scholar

Watt, R. , ‘Copyright collectives: Some basic economic theory’ in Watt, R. (ed.), Handbook on the Economics of Copyright (Edward Elgar, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watt, R. , ‘Licensing of copyright works in a bargaining model’ in Watt, R. (ed.), Handbook on the Economics of Copyright (Edward Elgar, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watt, R. , ‘The Efficiencies of Aggregation: An Economic Theory Perspective on Collective Management of Copyright’, Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 12 (2015), 26Google Scholar

Weatherill, S., ‘The Challenge of Better Regulation’ in Weatherill, S. (ed.), Better Regulation (Hart Publishing, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whish, R. and Bailey, D., Competition Law, 8th edn. (Oxford University Press, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williamson, O. E., The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (The Free Press, 1985)Google Scholar

Wolf, Alexander, ‘Collecting societies as enablers for multiterritorial licensing of music’, EP Hearing on Collective Rights Management in the Digital Era, 1 October 2012Google Scholar

Wood, A., ‘The CJEU’s ruling in the Premier League pub TV cases – the final whistle beckons: joined cases Football Association Premier League Ltd v QC Leisure (C-403/08) and Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (C-429/08)’, European Intellectual Property Review, 34 (2012), 203Google Scholar

Yow, J. W. L., ‘Creative Competition’ with a Pan-European Licensing Body: Reconsidering the European Commission’s Approach to Collecting Societies’, World Competition, 34 (2011), 287CrossRefGoogle Scholar