Leibniz, G. W.Codex Juris Gentium Diplomaticus. Hanoverae: Literis et impensis Samuelis Ammonii, 1693.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W.Oedipus Chymicus. In Miscellanea Berolinensia. Berlin: Sumptibus Johann. Christ. Papenii, 1710, pp. 16–22.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W.Historia inventionis Phosphori. In Miscellanea Berolinensia. Berlin: Sumptibus Johann. Christ. Papenii, 1710, pp. 91–8.Google Scholar

Commercium epistolicum D. Johannis Collins et aliorum de analysi promota. Londini: Typis Pearsonianis, 1712 (January 1673 N.S.)

Leibniz, G. W.Anti-Jacobite ou Faussetés de l'Avis aux Proprietaires Anglois Refuteés par des Reflexions impartiales. N. pl., 1715.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W.Collectanea Etymologica. Ed. by J. G., Eckhart. Hanover, 1717.Google Scholar

Feller, Joachim Friedrich, ed., Otium Hanoveranum, sive, Miscellanea ex ore & schedis illustris viri, piae memoriae, Godofr. Guilielmi Leibnitii. Lipsiae: Impensis Joann. Christiani Martini, 1718.

Leibniz, G. W.Tentamina Theodicaeae de Bonitate Dei, Libertate Hominis et Origine Mali. Latine versa et Notationibus illustrata a M. D. L. Ab ipso auctore emendata et auctior. Francofurti: Sumptibus Caroli Josephi Bencard, 1719.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W.Epistolae ad diversos. Ed. by Chr., Kortholt. 4 vols. Leipzig: B. C. Breitkopfius, 1734–1742.Google Scholar

Gruber, J. D., ed. Commercii Epistolici Leibnitiani, ad omne genus eruditionis comparati, per partes publicandi. Tomi prodromi pars altera. Hanoverae et Gottingae: Apud Io. Wilhelm. Schmidium, 1745.

Kapp, J. E., ed. Sammlung einiger Vertrauten Briefe, welche zwischen … Leibnitz und … Herrn Daniel Ernst Jablonski, auch andern Gelehrten, Besonders über die Vereinigung der Lutherischen und Reformirten Religion … gewechselt worden sind. Leipzig, 1745.

Leibniz, G. W.Protogaea sive de prima facie telluris et antiquissimae historiae vestigiis in ipsis naturae monumentis dissertatio. Ed. by Ch. L., Scheidt. Göttingen, 1749. (Modern editiön: Toulouse-Le Mirail, 1993; introduction by Jean-Marie Bar¬rande, pp. i–xxxi.)Google Scholar

Raspe, R. E., ed. Oeuvres philosophiques latines et francoises de feu Mr de Leibnitz. Amsterdam and Leipzig: Schreuder, 1765.

Feder, J. G. H., ed. Commercii Epistolici Leibnitiani Typis nondum vulgati Selecta specimena. Hanover, 1805.

Rommel, Chr. von, ed. Leibnizund Landgraf Ernst von Hessen-Rheinfels. Ein ungedruckter Briefwechsel über religiöse und politische Gegenstande. Frankfurt am Mein: J. Rutten, 1847.

Leibniz, G. W.Lettres et opuscules inédits. Ed. by Louis Alexander Foucher, de Careil. Paris, 1854. Reprint, Hildesheim: Olm, 1975.Google Scholar

Foucher de Careil, Louis Alexander, ed. Réfutation inédite de Spinoza par Leibniz. Paris, 1854.

Roessler, E. F., ed. “Beiträge zur Staatsgeschichte Oesterreichs aus dem Leibnitzschen Nachlasse in Hannover.” Sitzungsberichte der philosophisch-historischen Classe der Kais. Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Wien 20 (1856): 267–89.

Leibniz, G. W.Nouvelles lettres et opuscules inédits. Ed. by Louis Alexander Foucher, de Careil. Paris: Auguste Durand, 1857.Google Scholar

Gerhardt, C. I., ed. Briefwechsel zwischen Leibniz und Christian Wolff. Halle: H. W. Schmidt, 1860.

Foucher de Careil, Louis Alexander. Leibniz, la philosophie juive et la Cabale. Paris: Auguste Durand, 1861.Google Scholar

Klopp, O., ed. “Leibniz' Plan der Gründung einer Societät der Wissenschaften in Wien.” Archiv für österreichische Geschichte. Vol. 40. Vienna, 1869, pp. 157–255.

Guerrier, Woldemar. Leibniz in seinen Beziehungen zu Russland und Peter dem Grossen. St. Petersburg and Leipzig, 1873.Google Scholar

Doebner, R., ed. “Leibnizens Briefwechsel mit dem Minister von Bernstorff und andere Leibniz betreffende Briefe und Attenstucke aus den Jahren 1705–1716.” Zeitschrift des historischen Vereins für Niedersachsen (1881): 205–380.

Bodemann, Eduard, ed. “Leibnizens Plan einer Societät der Wissenschaften in Sachsen.” Neues Archiv für Sächsische Geschichte und Alterthumskunde 4 (1883): 177–214.

Doebner, R., ed. “Nachträge zu Leibnizens Briefwechsel mit dem Minister von Bernstorff.” Zeitschrift des historischen Vereins für Niedersachsen (1884): 206–42.

Bodemann, Eduard, ed. “Leibnizens Entwürfe zu seinen Annalen von 1691 und 1692.” Zeitschrift des Historischen Vereins für Niedersachsen (1885): 1–58.

Mollat, Georg, ed. Rechsphilosophisches aus Leibnizens Ungedruckten Schriften. Leipzig: Verlag Robolski, 1885.

Bodemann, Eduard, ed. “Leibnizens Briefwechsel mit dem Herzoge Anton Ulrich von Braunschweig-Wolfenbüttel.” Zeitschrift des historischen Vereins für Niedersachsen (1888): 73–244.

Bodemann, Eduard, ed. “Nachträge zu ‘Leibnizens Briefwechsel mit dem Minister v. Bernstorff und andere Leibniz betr. Briefe.’” Zeitschrift des historischen Vereins für Niedersachsen (1890): 131–68.

Kvačala, J.Neue Beiträge zum Briefwechsel zwischen D. E. Jablonski und G. W. Leibniz. In Acta et Commentationes Imp. Universitatis Jurievensis 4 (1899): 11–192.Google Scholar

Bodemann, Eduard, and S., Dickstein, eds. “Korespondencya Kochańskiego i Leibniza.” Prace Matematyczno-fizyczne 12 (1901): 226–73.

Doebner, R., ed. Briefe der Königin Sophie Charlotte von Preußen und der Kurfürstin Sophie von Hannover an hannoversche Diplomaten. Leipzig, 1905 (Publ. a. d. Preuß. Staatsarchiven. 79; new print: Osnabrück, 1965).

Leibniz, G. W.Nachgelassene Schriften physikalischen, mechanischen und technischen Inhalts. Ed. by Ernst, Gerland. Leipzig: Teubner, 1906.Google Scholar

Child, J. M.The Early Mathematical Manuscripts of Leibniz. Chicago and London, 1920.Google Scholar

Schnath, G., ed. Briefwechsel der Kurfürstin Sophie von Hannover mit dem Preußischen Königshause. Berlin and Leipzig, 1927.

Schrecker, Paul, ed. “G.-W. Leibniz. Lettres et fragments inédits.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l'étranger 118 (1934): 5–134.

Leibniz, G. W.Principes de la nature et de la grâce fondés en raison. Principes de la philosophie ou monadologie. Ed. by Andreé, Robinet. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1954.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W.Reise-Journal. 1687–1688. Hildesheim: Olms, 1966.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W.Discours de métaphysique et Monadologie. Texte définitif avec indexation automatiseée. Ed. by Andreé, Robinet. Paris: Vrin, 1974.Google Scholar

Hartmann, Fritz, and Matthias, Krüger, eds. “Directiones ad rem Medicam pertinentes. Ein Manuskript G. W. Leibnizens aus den Jahren 1671/72 über die Medizin.” Studia Leibnitiana 8, no. 1 (1976): 40–68.

Leibniz, G. W.Novissima Sinica. [Hanover] 1697 (2nd ed. [Hanover] 1699). Modern edition: Das neueste von China. Novissima Sinica. Ed. by Heinz-Günther, Nesselrath and Hermann, Reinbothe. Cologne: Deutsche China-Gesellschaft, 1979.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W.Generales inquisitiones de analysi notionum et veritatum. [Latin and German] Ed., trans., and with a commentary by Franz, Schupp. Hamburg: Meiner, 1982.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W.Specimen Dynamicum. Latin and German. Ed. and trans. by Hans Günter, Dosch, Glenn W., Most, and Enno, Rudolph. Hamburg: Meiner, 1982.Google Scholar

Widmaier, Rita, ed. Leibniz korrespondiert mit China. Der Briefwechsel mit den Jesuitenmissionaren (1689–1714). Frankfürt am Main: Klostermann, 1990.

Leibniz, G. W.De l'horizon de la doctrine humaine. Αποκατάστασις πάντων (La Restitution Universelle). Ed. by Michel, Fichant. Paris: Vrin, 1991.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W.Phoranomus seu de potentia et legibus naturae: Rome, Juillet 1689. Prés. par Andre Robinet. In Physis (Florence) 28, no. 2/3 (1991): 429–541 and 797–885. [Extracts from the Phoranomus are published by C. I. Gerhardt in Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 1 (1888): 575–81.]Google Scholar

Fichant, Michel, ed. G. W. Leibniz. La reéforme de la dynamique. De Corporum concursu (1678), et autres texts inédits. Paris: Vrin, 1994.

Leibniz, G. W.Die Grundlagen des logischen Kalküls. [Latin and German] Ed., trans., and with a commentary by Franz, Schupp. Hamburg: Meiner, 2000.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W.Discours sur la Theologie naturelle des Chinois. Ed. by Wenchao, Li and Hans, Poser. Frankfürt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 2002.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W.Schriften und Briefe zur Geschichte. Ed. with introduction and commentary by Malte-Ludolf, Babin and Gerd, van den Heuvel. Hanover: Verlag Hahnsche Buchhandlung, 2004.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W.Essais scientifiques et philosophiques. Les articles publiés dans les journaux savants recueillis par Antonio Lamarra et Roberto Palaia. Préface de Heinrich Schepers. 3 vols. Hildesheim: Olms, 2005.Google Scholar

The Leibniz–Clarke Correspondence. Ed. with introduction and notes by H. G., Alexander. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1956.

Leibniz, G. W.Logical papers. Trans. by G. H. R., Parkinson. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W.Philosophical Writings. Ed. by G. H. R., Parkinson. Trans. by Mary, Morris and G. H. R., Parkinson. London: J M Dent & Sons, 1973.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W.The Political Writings of Leibniz. Trans. and ed. with an introduction by Patrick, Riley. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leibniz, G. W.Confessio Philosophi e altri scritti. Ed. by Francesco, Piro. Naples: Cronopio, 1992.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W.De Summa Rerum. Metaphysical Papers, 1675–1676. Trans. with an introduction and notes by G. H. R., Parkinson. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W.Writings on China. Ed. by Daniel J., Cook and Henry, Rosemont Jr.Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1994.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W.Scritti filosofici. Ed. and trans. by Massimo, Mugnai and Enrico, Pasini. 3 vols. Turin: Utet, 2000.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W.The Labyrinth of the Continuum: Writings on the Continuum Problem, 1672–1686. Trans., ed., and with an introduction by Richard, Arthur. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W.Confessio Philosophi: Papers Concerning the Problem of Evil, 1671–1678. Trans., ed., and with an introduction by Robert C., Sleigh Jr. Additional contributions from Brandon, Look and James, Stam. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

The Leibniz–Des Bosses Correspondence. Trans., ed., and with an introduction by Brandon C., Look and Donald, Rutherford. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2007.

Alsted, Johann Heinrich. Panacea philosophica. Herborn, 1610.Google Scholar

Alsted, Johann Heinrich. Encyclopaedia septem tomis distincta. 7 tomes in 2 vols. Herborn, 1630.Google Scholar

Althusius, Johannes. Dicaeologicae libri tres, totum et universum jus … methodicè complectentes. Herborn, 1617, 1618; Frankfurt am Main, 1649.Google Scholar

Arnauld, Antoine and Pierre, Nicole. Logique, ou l'art de penser. Paris, 1662.Google Scholar

Arnauld, Antoine. Lettres de Monsieur Arnauld, Docteur de Sorbonne, au R. P. Malebranche, Prétre de l'Oratoire. N. pl., 1685.Google Scholar

Bacon, Francis. Instauratio magna. London: Apud Joannem Billium, 1620.Google Scholar

Bacon, Francis. De dignitate et augmentis scientiarum. London: I. Haviland, 1623.Google Scholar

Baillet, Adrien. La vie de Monsieur Descartes. 2 vols. Paris: Horthemels, 1691.Reprint, Geneva, 1970.Google Scholar

Bayle, Pierre. Dictionaire historique et critique. Rotterdam: Reinier Leers, 1697; 2nd ed. 3 vols. Rotterdam: Reinier Leers, 1702.Google Scholar

Bayle, Pierre. “Memoire communiqué par Mr. Bayle.” Histoire des ouvrages des savans (August 1704): 369–96.Google Scholar

Becher, Johann Joachim. Character, pro notitia linguarum universali. Inventum steganographicum hactenus inauditum. Frankfurt, 1661.Google Scholar

Becher, Johann Joachim. Appendix practica, uber Seinen Methodum Didacticam. Munich, 1669.Google Scholar

Becher, Johann Joachim. Närrische Weisheit und weise Narrheit. Frankfurt am Main: Johann Peter Zubrods, 1682.Google Scholar

Beck, Cave. The Universal Character, By Which All the Nations in the World May Understand One Anothers Conceptions. London, 1657.Google Scholar

Berkeley, George. A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. Dublin: Printed by Aaron Rhames for Jeremy Pepyat, 1710.Google Scholar

Birch, Thomas. The History of the Royal Society of London. 4 vols. London: A. Millar, 1756–1757.Google Scholar

Bisterfeld, Johann Heinrich. Elementorum logicorum libri tres […]. Accedit, ejusdem authoris, phosphorus catholicus, seu artis meditandi epitome. Cui subjunctum est, consilium de studiis feliciter instituendis. Lugduni Batavorum: Ex Officina Henrici Verbiest., 1657.Google Scholar

Bisterfeld, Johann Heinrich. Philosophiae primae seminarium. Lugduni Batavorum: Apud Danielem et Abrahamum Gaasbeck, 1657.Google Scholar

Bodemann, Eduard, ed. Aus den Briefen der Elisabeth Charlotte von Orléans an Kurfürstin Sophie. 2 vols. Hanover, 1891.

Bodemann, Eduard, ed. Briefe der Herzogin Elisabeth Charlotte von Orléans an ihre frühere Hofmeisterin A. K.v. Harling, geb. v. Uffeln, und deren Gemahl, Geh. Rath Fr. v. Harling zu Hannover. Hanover and Leipzig: Hahn, 1895.

Boyle, Robert. The Origine of Formes and Qualities (According to the Corpuscular Philosophy). Oxford: Printed by H. Hall … for R. Davis, 1666.Google Scholar

Boyle, Robert. Some Motives and Incentives to the Love of God. 5th ed. London: Printed for H. Herringman, 1670.Google Scholar

Boyle, Robert. The Excellency of Theology, Compar'd with Natural Philosophy. London: Printed by T. N. for Henry Herringman, 1674.Google Scholar

Boyle, Robert. Some Considerations about the Reconcileableness of Reason and Religion. London: Printed by T. N. for H. Herringman, 1675.Google Scholar

Boyle, Robert. Some Physico-Theological Considerations about the Possibility of the Resurrection. London: Printed by T. N. for Henry Herringman, 1675.Google Scholar

Bossuet, Jacques-Bénigne. Exposition de la doctrine de l'Eglise catholique sur les matières de controverse. Paris: Chez Sebastien Mabre-Cramoisy, 1671.Google Scholar

Bossuet, Jacques-Bénigne. De scripto qui titulus: Cogitationes privatae … Episcopi Meldensis sententia. In Oeuvres complètes. Ed. by F., Lachat. 31 vols. Paris, 1862–1879, vol. 17, pp. 458–99.Google Scholar

Bossuet, Jacques-Bénigne. Oeuvres complètes. Ed. by F., Lachat. 31 vols. Paris, 1862–1879.Google Scholar

Bossuet, Jacques-Bénigne. Correspondance. Ed. by C., Urbain and E., Levesque. New edition. 15 vols. Paris: Hachette, 1909–1925.Google Scholar

Bouvet, Joachim. Portrait historique de l'Empereur de la Chine. Paris: Michallet, 1697.Google Scholar

Bruno, Giordano. De monade numero et figura liber consequens quinque de minimo magno et mensura. Francofurti: Apud loan. Wechelum & Petrum Fischerum consortes, 1591.Google Scholar

Burnet, Gilbert. Exposition of the Thirty-Nine Articles of the Church of England. London: R. Roberts, 1699.Google Scholar

Burnet, Thomas. Telluris theoria sacra. London: Kettilby, 1681. English translation: The Theory of the Earth. 2 vols. London: Kettilby, 1684–90. Modern edition of the 1689–91 English version: The Sacred Theory of the Earth. With an introduction by Basil Willey. London: Centaur Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Cavalieri, Bonaventura. Geometria indivisibilibus continuorum nova quadam ratione promota. Bononiae: ex typographia de Ducijs, 1653.Google Scholar

Cheyne, George. Fluxionum methodus inversa. Londini: Typis J. Matthews, 1703.Google Scholar

Clauberg, Johannes. Logica vetus et nova quadripartita. Amstelodami: Apud Ludovicum Elzevirium, 1654.Google Scholar

Comenius, J. A.Januae linguarum reseratae aureae vestibulum, quo primus ad latinam ed. tiruneulis paratur: cum versione interlineari Germanica. Leipzig, 1639.Google Scholar

Comenius, J. A.Via Lucis. 1641. In Johannis Amos Comenii Operaomnia. Vol. 14. Prague: Academia, 1974.Google Scholar

Comenius, J. A.Unum necessarium. 1668. In Johannis Amos Comenii Opera omnia. Vol. 18. Prague: Academia, 1974.Google Scholar

Conring, Hermann. De antiquissimo statu Helmestadii et vicinae conjecturae. Helmstedt, 1665.Google Scholar

Conway, Anne. Principia philosophiae antiquissimae et recentissimae de Deo, Christo et creatura. Amstelodami, 1690.Google Scholar

Cordemoy, Géraud de. Copie d'une lettre ecrite à unsçavant religieux de la Compagnie de Jesus [Gabriel Cossart]. [Paris: T. Girard, 1669.]

Cudworth, Ralph. The True Intellectual System of the Universe. London: Printed for Richard Royston, 1678.Google Scholar

Dalgarno, George. Ars signorum, vulgo character universalis et lingua philosophica. London, 1661.Google Scholar

Dalgarno, George. George Dalgarno on universal language: The art of signs (1661), The deaf and dumb man's tutor (1680), and the unpublished papers. Ed. with a translation, introduction, and commentary by David, Cram and Jaap, Maat. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Descartes, Reneé. Principia philosophiae. Amsterdam: Elzevir, 1644.Google Scholar

Descartes, Reneé. Geometria. Ed. by Frans, van Schooten. Leiden: Joannes Maire, 1649 (2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elzevir, 1659–61).Google Scholar

Descartes, Reneé. Opera philosophica. Editio Secunda ab Auctore recognita. Amsterdam, 1650.Google Scholar

Descartes, Reneé. Oeuvres. Ed. by. C., Adam and P., Tannery. Paris: Vrin, 1964–1976.Google Scholar

Epictetus. Enchiridion. Leiden and Antwerp, 1670.

Fatio de Duillier, Nicolas. Lineae brevissimi descensus investigatio geometrica duplex. Cui addita est investigatio geometrica solidi rotundi, in quod minima fiat resistentia. London, 1699. Published also in Commercium Epistolicum.Google Scholar

Fatouville, Nolant de. Arlequin empereur dans la lune. Troyes: Garnier, s. d.

Fontenelle, Bernard le Bovier de. “Éloge de M. Leibnitz.” In Histoire de l'Académie Royale des sciences. Année 1716. Paris: Impr. Royale, 1718, pp. 94–128.Google Scholar

Foucher, Simon. Critique de la recherche de la vérité. Paris, 1675.Google Scholar

Foucher, Simon. Réponse pour la critique à laPréface du second volume de la recherche de la vérité. Paris, 1676.Google Scholar

Freke, William. A Dialogue by Way of Question and Answer, Concerning the Deity. All the Responses Being Taken Verbatim out of the Scriptures. – A Brief, but Clear Confutation of the Doctrine of the Trinity. London, 1693.Google Scholar

Galilei, Galileo. Discorsi e dimostrazioni matematiche intorno a due nuove scienze. Leiden, 1638. In Opere … in questa nuova editione … accresciute. 2 vols. Bologna, 1656.Google Scholar

Galilei, Galileo. Opere. Edizione Nazionale. 20 vols. Florence, 1890–1909. New reprint, Florence, 1964–6.Google Scholar

Guericke, Otto von. Experimenta nova (ut vocantur) Magdeburgica de vacuo spatio. Amstelodami, 1672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hessen-Rheinfels, Ernst von. Der so warhaffte alsgantz auffrichtig- und discret-gesinnte Catholischer. N. pl., 1666.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. Elementorum philosophiae sectio tertia de cive. Paris, 1642.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. Elementorum philosophiae sectio prima de corpore. London, 1655.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, and Chance: Clearly Stated and Debated between Dr. Bramhall, Bishop of Derry, and Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury. London: Printed for Andrew Crook, 1656.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. Elementorum philosophiae sectio secunda de homine. London, 1658.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. The English Works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury. Ed. by William, Molesworth. 11 vols. London, 1839–1845.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. The Correspondence. Ed. by Noel, Malcolm. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Hutter, Leonhard. Compendium locorum theologicorum ex scripturis sacris et libro concordiae collectum. Wittebergae: Helwig, 1610.Google Scholar

Huygens, Christiaan. “Extrait d'une lettre de M. Hugens à l'Auteur du Journal.” Journal des Sçavans (18 March 1669): 22–4.Google Scholar

Huygens, Christiaan. “A Summary Account of the Laws of Motion, communicated by Mr. Christian Hugens in a Letter to the R. Society, and since printed in French in the Journal des Scavans of March 18, 1669. St. n.” Philosophical Transactions 46 (12 April 1669)(O.S.): 925–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huygens, Christiaan. Horologium oscillatorium. Paris, 1673.Google Scholar

Huygens, Christiaan. Oeuvres complètes. 22 vols. The Hague, 1888–1950.Google Scholar

Jablonski, Daniel Ernst. Kurtze Vorstellung der Einigkeit und des Unterscheides, im Glauben beyder Evangelischen so genandten Lutherischen und Reformirten Kirchen. In Labora diligenter. Ed. by Martin, Fontius, Hartmut, Rudolph, and Gary, Smith. Stuttgart: Steiner, 1999, pp. 128–64.Google Scholar

Jaquelot, Isaac. Conformité de la foi avec la raison, ou defence de la religion. Amsterdam, 1705. (Including Jaquelot's Système abregé de l'âme et de la liberté.)Google Scholar

Jaquelot, Isaac. Traité de la vérité et de l'inspiration des livres du Vieux et du Nouveau Testament. Rotterdam: Aux deépens de Gaspard Fritsch, 1715.Google Scholar

Jungius, Joachim. Logica Hamburgensis, hoc est, Institutiones logicae in usum schol[ae] Hamburg[ensis] conscriptae, & sex libris comprehensae. Hamburg: B. Of ferman, 1638.Google Scholar

Keckermann, Bartholomäus. Opera omnia. 2 vols. Geneva, 1614.Google Scholar

Keill, John. “Epistola … de Legibus Virium Centripetarum.” Philosophical Transactions 26 (1708): 174–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kerof Kersland, John. Memoirs …Containing His SecretTransactions and Negotiations in Scotland, England, the Court of Vienna, Hanover, and Other Foreign Part. [Part I]. London, 1726. (A French version appeared in Rotterdam in the same year.)Google Scholar

Kielmanseff, Erich Graf von, ed. Briefe des Herzogs Ernst August [1674–1728] zu Braunschweig-Lüneburg an Johann Franz Diedrich von Wendt aus den Jahren 1703 bis 1726. Hanover and Leipzig, 1902.

King, William. De Origine Mali. London, 1702.Google Scholar

Kircher, Athanasius. Polygraphia nova et universalis ex combinatoria arte detecta. Rome, 1663.Google Scholar

Kircher, Athanasius. Ars magna sciendi sive Combinatoria. 2 vols. Amsterdam, 1699.Google Scholar

La Croze, Mathurin Veyssières de. Dissertations historiques sur divers sujets. Rotterdam: Reinier Leers, 1707.Google Scholar

Lamy, François. De la connoissance de soi-même. 1st ed. Paris, 1694–1698. 2nd ed. Paris, 1669/1701.Google Scholar

Le Clerc, Jean. Epistolario. Ed. by Maria, Grazia and Mario, Sina. 4 vols. Florence: Olschki, 1987–1997.Google Scholar

L'Hôpital, Guillaume François Antoine de. Analyse des infiniment petits, pour l'intelligence des lignes courbes. Paris: de l'Imprimerie royale, 1696.Google Scholar

Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding: in Four Books. London: Printed for Th. Basset, 1690; 2nd ed. London: Printed for Awnsham and J. Churchill, 1694; critical ed. by P. H. Nidditch in The Clarendon Edition of the Works of John Locke. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Locke, John. A Letter to the Right Reverend Edward Lord Bishop of Worcester, Concerning Some Passages Relating to Mr. Locke's “Essay of Humane Understanding”: In a Late Discourse of His Lordship, in Vindication of the Trinity. London: Printed for A. and J. Churchill, 1697.Google Scholar

Locke, John. Reply to the Right Reverend the Lord Bishop of Worcester's Answer to His “Letter Concerning Some Passages Relating to Mr. Locke's Essay of Humane Understanding”: In a Late Discourse of His Lordship, in Vindication of the Trinity. London: Printed for A. and J. Churchill, 1697.Google Scholar

Locke, John. Reply to the Right Reverend the Lord Bishop of Worcester's Answer to His Second Letter. London: Printed for A. and J. Churchill, 1699.Google Scholar

Locke, John. Essai philosophique concernant l'entendement humain. Trans. from the 4th ed. by Pierre, Coste. Amsterdam: Schelte, 1700.Google Scholar

Locke, John. The Correspondence. Ed. by E. S., de Beer. 8 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976–1989.Google Scholar

Longobardi, Nicolas. Traité sur quelques points de la religion des Chinois. In Anciens traitez de divers auteurs sur les ceremonies de la Chine. Paris, 1701.Google Scholar

Lütke, Franz Julius. Christliche unmaßgebliche Gedancken über die Vereinigung Der beyden Protestirenden Kirchen. In Franz Julius, Lütke, Unvorgreiffliche doch Wolgemeinte Gedancken von Vereinigung der Christlichen Religionen. N. pl., 1703, pp. 38–49.Google Scholar

Lull, Ramon. Ars magna generalis ultima. Venice, 1480.Google Scholar

Lull, Ramon. Opera. Strasbourg, 1598.Google Scholar

Luther, Martin. De servo arbitrio. (1525) In D. Martin Luthers Werke. Kritische Gesamtausgabe. Weimar, 1883 ff., vol. 18, pp. 600–787.Google Scholar

Luther, Martin. Der kleine Catechismus für die gemeine Pfarherr und Prediger. Leipzig: Hartung, 1860. (Reprint of the 1st ed. Erfurt, 1529.)Google Scholar

Malebranche, Nicolas. Conversations chrétiennes dans lesquelles on justifie la vérité dela religion et de la morale de Jésus-Christ. Mons: G. Migeot, 1677. (Nouvelle eédition corrigeée et augmenteée, Bruxelles: impr. de J. Fricx, 1677.)Google Scholar

Malebranche, Nicolas. De la recherche de la vérité. Quatrieme edition reveuë et augmenteée. Paris, 1678–1679.Google Scholar

Malebranche, Nicolas. Traité de la nature et de la grace. Rotterdam, 1684.Google Scholar

Malebranche, Nicolas. Trois lettres de l'auteur de la Recherche de la vérité, touchant la defense de Mr. Arnauld contre la réponse au livre des vrayes et fausses idées. Rotterdam, 1685.Google Scholar

Malebranche, Nicolas. Entretien d'un philosophe chretien et d'un philosophe Chinois. Paris, 1708.Google Scholar

Mariotte, Edme. Essay de logique contenant les principes des sciences. Paris, 1678.Google Scholar

Matthaeus, Anton. Collegia juris. Franekerae, 1647.Google Scholar

Mengoli, Pietro. Novae quadraturae arithmeticae. Bologna, 1650.Google Scholar

Meyer, Lodewijk. Philosophia s. scripturae interpres; Exercitatioparadoxa, in qua, veram philosophiam infallibilem s. literas interpretandi normam esse, apodictice demonstratur, & discrepantes ad hac sententiae expenduntur, ac refelluntur. Eleutheropoli [Amsterdam], 1666.Google Scholar

Molanus, Gerhard Wolter. Cogitationes privatae de methodo reunionis Ecclesiae protestantium cum Ecclesia Romano-Catholica. (1691) In Jacques-Beénigne, Bossuet, Oeuvres complètes. Ed. by F., Lachat. 31 vols. Paris, 1862–1879, vol. 17, Paris, 1864, pp. 294–431.Google Scholar

Molanus, Gerhard Wolter and Hermann, Barckhausen. Methodus reducendae unionis ecclesiasticae inter Romanenses et Protestantes. (1683) In R. A., Nolte, Commercium litterarium clarorum virorum. Brunsvigae: Renger, 1737–1738, pp. 327 ff.Google Scholar

More, Henry. Enchiridion ethicum. London, 1668.Google Scholar

Newton, Isaac. Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica. Londini: Jussu Societatis Regiœ ac Typis Josephi Streater, 1687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newton, Isaac. Opticks: or, A treatise of the reflexions, refractions, inflexions and colours of light. Also two treatises of the species and magnitude of curvilinear figures. London: Printed for Sam. Smith 1704. (Including De quadratura curvarum and Enumeratio linearum tertii ordinis.)

Newton, Isaac. Optice: sive De reflexionibus, refractionibus, inflexionibus & coloribus lucis libri tres. Latine reddidit Samuel Clarke. Londini: impensis Sam. Smith & Benj. Walford, 1706.Google Scholar

Newton, Isaac. “An Account of the Book entituled Commercium Epistolicum Collinii et aliorum.” Philosophical Transactions 29, no. 342 (1715): 173–224.Google Scholar

Newton, Isaac. The Correspondence of Isaac Newton. 7 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1959–1977.Google Scholar

Nolte, R. A.Mathematischer Beweis der Erschaffung und Ordnung der Welt in einem Medallion. Leipzig: Langenheim, 1734.Google Scholar

Nye, Stephen. Considerations on the Explications of the Doctrine of the Trinity, by Dr. Wallis, Dr. Sherlock, Dr. S-th, Dr. Cudworth, and Mr. Hooker. London, 1693.Google Scholar

Oldenburg, Heinrich. The Correspondence of Henry Oldenburg. Ed. by A. Rupert, Hall and M. Boas, Hall. 13 vols. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press and London: Taylor and Francis, 1965n1986.Google Scholar

Pascal, Blaise. Lettres de A. Dettonville. Paris, 1659.Google Scholar

Pellisson-Fontanier, Paul. Reflexions sur les differends de la religion. Paris: Chez Gabriel Martin, 1686.Google Scholar

Pellisson-Fontanier, Paul. Reflexions sur les differens de la religion. Quatrième partie. Ou reéponse aux objections envoyéees d'Allemagne, sur l'unitée de l'Eglise, et sur la question, si elle peut toleérer les sectes. Paris: chez la Veuve de Gabriel Martin, 1691.Google Scholar

Pellisson-Fontanier, Paul. De la tolerance des religions, lettres de M. de Leibniz et réponses de M. Pellisson, Ou quatrième partie des Reflexions sur les differends de la religion. Paris: Jean Anisson, 1692.Google Scholar

Petersen, Johann Wilhelm. Uranias qua opera Dei magna omnibus retro seculis et oeconomiis transactis usque ad apocatastasin seculorum omnium … carmine heroico celebrantur. Francofurti et Lipsiae: sumptu Novi Bibliopolii, 1720.Google Scholar

Pfaff, Christopher Matthäus. “Fragmentum Epistolae a Cel. D. Christoph. Matthaeo Pfaffio.” Acta Eruditorum (March 1728): 125–7.Google Scholar

Pufendorf, Samuel (pseudonymous: Severinus de Monzambano). De statu imperii germanici. Geneva, 1667.Google Scholar

Pufendorf, Samuel. Disquisitio de republica irregulari ad Severini Monzambano Cap. IV de forma imperii Germanici. N. pl., 1669.Google Scholar

Pufendorf, Samuel. De jure naturae et gentium. Lund, 1672.Google Scholar

Pufendorf, Samuel. De officio hominis et civis juxta legem naturalem. Lund, 1673.Google Scholar

Rays, John. Miscellaneous discourses, concerning the dissolution and changes of the world. London, 1692.Google Scholar

Rohault, Jacques. Physica. Latineè reddidit, & annotatiunculis quibusdam illustravit S. Clarke. Londini: Impensis Jacobi Knapton, 1697.Google Scholar

Rojas y Spinola, Cristobal de. Regulae circa christianorum omnium ecclesiasticam reunionem (1682/1683). In J. C., Lünig, Publicorum negotiorum sylloge. Frankfurt and Leipzig, 1694, pp. 1092–1124.Google Scholar

Ronsard, P.Le tombeau du feu Roy Tres-Chrestien Charles IX. Paris, 1574.Google Scholar

Rosenroth, Christian Knorr von. Kabbala denudata, seu doctrina Hebraeorum transcendentalis et metaphysica atque theologica. Sulzbaci: Typis Abrahami Lichtenthaleri, 1677.Google Scholar

Rosenroth, Christian Knorr von. Kabbalae Denudatae tomus secundus: Id est Liber Sohar Restitutus … cui adjecta Adumbratio Cabbalae Christianae ad captum Judaeorum. Francofurti: Sumptibus Joannis Davidis Zunneri, 1684.Google Scholar

Saint-Vincent, Greégoire de. Opus geometricum quadraturae circuli et sectionum coni. Antwerp, 1647.Google Scholar

Santa Maria, Antonio Caballero de. Traité sur quelques points importans de la mission de la Chine. In Anciens traitez de divers auteurs sur les ceremonies de la Chine. Paris, 1701.Google Scholar

Scherzer, Johann Adam. Collegium anti-socinianum. Leipzig: F. Lanckisius, 1672.Google Scholar

Scherzer, Johann Adam. Heptas Catholica, seu de Catholico, quatenus fidei et ecclesiae tribuitur, VII. dissertationes academicœ. Lepzig: Typis Christiani Götzi, 1683.Google Scholar

Scherzer, Johann Adam. Anti-Bellarminus. Leipzig, 1703.Google Scholar

Scherzer, Johann Adam. Collegium anti-Calvinianum. Leipzig: Zschau, 1704.Google Scholar

Schulenburg, J. Chr. Unvorgreiflicher Vorschlag zur Vereinigung d. Fest-Zeit. Frankfurt and Leipzig, 1724.Google Scholar

Schwenter, Daniel and Georg Philipp, Harsdörffer. Deliciae physico-mathematicae. Vol. 1 (by Schwenter). Nuremberg, 1636. Vols. 2–3 (by Harsdoërffer). Nuremberg, 1651–1653.Google Scholar

Spener, Philipp Jakob. Consilia et judicia theologica latina. Francofurti ad Moenum: Zunner & Jungius, 1709.Google Scholar

Spinoza, Baruch. Opera posthuma. [Amsterdam], 1677.Google Scholar

Spinoza, Baruch. Opera. Ed. by Carl, Gebhardt. 4 vols. Heidelberg: Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung, 1925.Google Scholar

Spinoza, Baruch. Tractatus Theologico-Politicus. (1670) In C., Gebhardt, ed. Spinoza Opera. Vol. 3. Heidelberg: Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung, 1925.Google Scholar

Spinoza, Baruch. The Correspondence. Trans. and ed. by A., Wolf. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1928.Google Scholar

Spizelius, Theophilus [Spitzel, Gottlieb]. De atheismo eradicando ad virum praeclarissimum Dn. Antonium Reiserum Augustanum etc. Epistola. Augustae Vindelic.: apud G. Goebelium, 1669.Google Scholar

Stahl, Daniel. Compendium metaphysicae in XXIV tabellas redactum. Jena, 1655.Google Scholar

Stensen, Niels. De solido intra solidum naturaliter contento. Florence, 1669.Google Scholar

Stillingfleet, Edward. A Discourse in Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity. London: Printed by H. J. for Henry Mortlock, 1697.Google Scholar

Stillingfleet, Edward. The Bishop of Worcester's Answer to Mr. Locke's Letter. London: Printed by J. H. for Henry Mortlock, 1697.Google Scholar

Stillingfleet, Edward. The Bishop of Worcester's Answer to Mr. Locke's Second Letter. London: Printed for J. H. for Henry Mortlock, 1698.Google Scholar

Sturm, Johannes. Academicae Epistolae. Strasbourg: Rihel, 1569.Google Scholar

Sturm, Johann Christoph. Idolum naturae similiumque nominum vanorum ex hominum christianorum animis deturbandi conatus philosophicus. Altdorf: Heinrich Mayer, 1692. (University Dissertation: Praes. Sturm; Resp. Leonhard Christoph Riederer.)Google Scholar

Sully, Henry. Regle artificielle du Tems. Vienna: André Heyinger, 1714.Google Scholar

Thomasius, Jakob. Philosophia practica. Leipzig, 1661.Google Scholar

Thomasius, Jakob. De sectarum conciliationibus. Praemissa disputationi, habitae Anno 1668. d. 20. Junii. De quaestione: an Deus sit materia prima? Resp. Joh. Friderico Hekelio, Gerano. In Jakob, Thomasius, Praefationes sub auspicia disputationum suarum in Academia Lipsiensi, recitatae, argumenti varii. Lipsiae: Apud Johann. Fuhrmannum & Matthaeum Ritterum, 1681.Google Scholar

Thomasius, Jakob. Adversus philosophos novantiquos. In Jakob, Thomasius, Dissertationes LXIII: Varii argumenti magnam partem ad historiam philosophicam & ecclesiasticam pertinentes. Halae Magdeburgicae: Impensis J. F. Zeitleri, 1693.Google Scholar

Toland, John. Christianity Not Mysterious: Or, a Treatise Shewing, That There Is Nothing in the Gospel Contrary to Reason, Nor above It: And That No Christian Doctrine Can Be Properly Call'd a Mystery. London, 1696.Google Scholar

Toland, John. Anglia Libera: Or the Limitation and Succession of the Crown of England Explain'd and Asserted. London: Printed for Bernard Lintott, 1701.Google Scholar

Toland, John. “Remarques critiques sur le systême de Monsr. Leibnitz de l'harmonie préetablie.” Histoire Critique de la République des Lettres 11 (1716): 115–33. Reprinted in The Leibniz Review 10 (2000): 114–33. Trans. by Richard Francks and R. S. Woolhouse (ibid., pp. 103–11).Google Scholar

Tournemine, Reneé-Joseph. “Conjectures sur l'union de l'ame et du corps.” Meémoires pour l'Histoire des Sciences et des Beaux Arts 7 (1704): 231–7.Google Scholar

Turmair, Johannes [Aventin]. Annalium Boiorum lib. VIII. Basel, 1580.Google Scholar

Turnbull, H. W., ed. James Gregory Tercentenary Memorial Volume. London: G. Bell & Sons, 1939.

Uffenbach, Zacharias Konrad von. Merkwürdige Reisen durch Niedersachsen, Holland, und England. Part 1. Ulm and Memmingen, 1753.Google Scholar

Walenburch, Adrian and Peter van. Tractatus generales de controversiis fidei. Coloniae Agrippinae: Apud Ioannem Wilhelmum Friessem juniorem, 1670.Google Scholar

Walenburch, Adrian and Peter van. Tractatus speciales, de controversiis fidei. Coloniae Agrippinae: Apud Ioannem Wilhelmum Friessem juniorem, 1670.Google Scholar

Wallis, John. Arithmetica infinitorum. Oxford, 1656.Google Scholar

Wallis, John. “Dr Wallis's opinion concerning the Hypothesis Physica Nova of Dr. Leibnitius, promised in Numb. 73. and here inserted in the same tongue, wherein it was written to the Publisher, April. 7. 1671.” Philosophical Transactions 74 (14 August 1671)(O.S.): 2227–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wallis, John. Opera mathematica. Vols. I, II, III. Oxford, 1695, 1693, 1699.Google Scholar

Whiston, William. New Theory of the Earth. London, 1696.Google Scholar

Wideburg, J. B. [Praes.] Diss. math. De praestantia arithmeticae binariae. Jena, 1718.Google Scholar

Winckler, Johann Joseph. Arcanum Regium. Frankfurt, 1703.Google Scholar

Wilkins, John. Essay towards a Real Character and a Philosophical Language. London, 1668.Google Scholar

Winckler, J. D., ed. Anecdota historico-ecclesiastica novantiqua. Braunschweig: Ludolph Schröders Erben, 1757.

Wolff, Christian. Vernünftige Gedanken: Von den Kraften des menschlichen Verstandes und ihrem richtigen Gebrauch in der Erkenntnis der Wahrheit [German Logic]. Halle, 1712. In Christian Wolff, Gesammelte Werke. 1. Abt., Deutsche Schriften. Vol. 1. Hildesheim: Olms, 1965.Google Scholar

Woodward, John. Essay towards aNatural History of the Earth. London, 1695.Google Scholar

Aiton, E. J.Leibniz: A Biography. Bristol and Boston: Adam Hilger, 1985.Google Scholar

Eckhart, Johann Georg. Lebensbeschreibung des Freyherrn von Leibnitz. In Journal zur Kunstgeschichte und zur allgemeinen Literatur. Ed. by Chr. G. von Murr., Nürnberg 7 (1779): 123–321. (Reprinted in Eberhard, J. A., and J. G. Eckhart. Leibniz-Biographien. Hildesheim: Olms, 2003.)Google Scholar

Guhrauer, Gottschalk Eduard. Gottfried Wilhelm Freiherr von Leibnitz. Eine Biographie. 2 vols. Breslau: Hirt, 1842. 2nd enlarged ed. Breslau: Hirt, 1846. Reprint, Hildesheim: Olms, 1966.Google Scholar

Hirsch, Eike Christian. Der berühmte Herr Leibniz: Eine Biographie. Munich: Beck, 2000.Google Scholar

Hochstetter, Erich. “Zu Leibniz' Gedächtnis. Eine Einleitung.” In Leibniz. Zu seinem 300. Geburtstage 1646–1946. Ed. by Erich, Hochstetter. Instalments 1–8. Berlin: W. de Gruyter, 1946–1952. Instalment 3, 1948, pp. 82.Google Scholar

Mackie, J. M.Life of Godfrey William von Leibnitz on the basis of the German work of Dr. G. E. Guhrauer. Boston (Mass): Gould, Kendell and Lincoln, 1845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller, Kurt. “Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Sein Leben und Wirken.” In Leibniz. Sein Leben, sein Wirken, seine Welt. Ed. by W., Totok and C., Haase. Hanover: Verlag für Literatur und Zeitgeschehen, 1966, pp. 1–64.Google Scholar

Müller, Kurt, and Gisela, Krönert. Leben und Werk von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Eine Chronik. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1969.Google Scholar

Schepers, Heinrich. “Leibniz.” In Neue Deutsche Biographie. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot, 1985, Vol. 14, pp. 121–31.Google Scholar

Bibliographie des oeuvres de Leibniz. Ed. by Émile, Ravier. Paris: F. Alcan, 1937. Reprint, Hildesheim: Olms, 1966.

Schrecker, Paul. “Une bibliographie de Leibniz.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l'eétranger 126 (1938): 324–46.Google Scholar

Leibniz-Bibliographie. Die Literatur über Leibniz bis 1980. Ed. by Albert, Heinekamp. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1984.

Leibniz-Bibliographie. Die Literatur über Leibniz 1981–1990. Ed. by Albert, Heinekamp. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1996.

Leibniz-Bibliographie at http://www.leibniz-bibliographie.de.

Leibniz à Paris (1672–1676). Symposion de la G. W. Leibniz-Gesellschaft. 2 vols. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1978.

Adams, Robert Merrihew. Leibniz. Determinist, Theist, Idealist. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Adams, Robert Merrihew. “Leibniz's Examination of the Christian Religion.” Faith and Philosophy 11, no. 4 (1994): 517–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, Robert Merrihew. “Leibniz's Conception of Religion.” In The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy. Vol 7: Modern, Philosophy. Ed. by Mark D. Gedney. Bowling Green: Philosophy Documentation Center, 2000, pp. 57–70.Google Scholar

Ahsmann, Margreet. “Teaching in Collegia: The Organisation of Disputationes at Universities in the Netherlands and Germany during the 16th and 17th Centuries.” In A., Romano, ed., Universitaè in Europa. Le istituzioni universitarie dal Medio Evo ai nostri giorni. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino, 1995, pp. 99–114.Google Scholar

Aiton, E. J. “An Unpublished Letter of Leibniz to Sloane.” Annals of Science 38 (1981): 103–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Angelelli, Ignacio. “Leibniz's Misunderstanding of Nizolius' Notion of ‘multitudo.’” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 6, no. 4 (1965): 319–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antognazza, Maria Rosa. “Inediti leibniziani sulle polemiche trinitarie.” Rivista di Filosofia neo-scolastica 83, no. 4 (1991): 525–50.Google Scholar

Antognazza, Maria Rosa. “Immeatio and emperichoresis. The Theological Roots of Harmony in Bisterfeld and Leibniz.” In The Young Leibniz and His Philosophy, 1646–1676. Ed. by Stuart, Brown. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999, pp. 41–64.Google Scholar

Antognazza, Maria Rosa. “The Defence of the Mysteries of the Trinity and the Incarnation: An Example of Leibniz's ‘Other’ Reason.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 9, no. 2 (2001): 283–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antognazza, Maria Rosa. “Debilissimae Entitates? Bisterfeld and Leibniz's Ontology of Relations.” The Leibniz Review 11 (2001): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antognazza, Maria Rosa. “Natural and Supernatural Mysteries: Leibniz's Annotatiunculae subitaneae on Toland's Christianity Not Mysterious.” In Nihil sine Ratione. Mensch, Natur und Technik im Wirken von G. W. Leibniz. VII. Internationaler Leibniz-Kongress. Ed. by Hans, Poser. 3 vols. Berlin: Leibniz-Gesellschaft, 2001, vol. I, pp. 17–24.Google Scholar

Antognazza, Maria Rosa, “Leibniz and Religious Toleration: The Correspondence with Paul Pellisson-Fontanier.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76, no. 4 (2002): 601–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antognazza, Maria Rosa. “Leibniz and the Post-Copernican Universe. Koyré Revisited.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 34 (2003): 309–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antognazza, Maria Rosa. Leibniz on the Trinity and the Incarnation: Reason and Revelation in the Seventeenth Century. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2007. Revised version of Trinita e Incarnazione: Il rapporto trafilosofia e teologia rivelata nelpensiero di Leibniz. Milan: Vita e Pensiero, 1999.Google Scholar

Antognazza, Maria Rosa, and Howard, Hotson, eds. Alsted and Leibniz on God, the Magistrate and the Millennium. Texts edited with introduction and commentary. Wolfenbütteler Arbeiten zur Barockforschung, vol. 34. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 1999.

Ariew, R. “G. W. Leibniz, Life and Works.” In The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz. Ed. by Nicholas, Jolley. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 18–42.Google Scholar

Arthur, Richard. “Russell's Conundrum. On the Relation of Leibniz's Monads to the Continuum.” In An Intimate Relation. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science. Ed. by J. R., Brown and J., Mittelstrass. Boston, Dordrecht, and London: Reidel, 1989, pp. 171–201.Google Scholar

Arthur, Richard. “Space and Relativity in Newton and Leibniz.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (1994): 219–40 (also in Leibniz. Ed. by Catherine Wilson. Dartmouth, 2001, pp. 61–82).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arthur, Richard. “Infinite Aggregates and Phenomenal Wholes: Leibniz's Theory of Substance as a Solution to the Continuum Problem.” Leibniz Society Review 8 (1998): 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arthur, Richard. “The Enigma of Leibniz's Atomism.” Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 1 (2003): 183–227.Google Scholar

Asch, Ronald G.The Thirty Years War: The Holy Roman Empire and Europe, 1618–1648. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Badur, Klaus, and Wolfgang, Rottstedt. “Und sie rechnet doch richtig! Erfahrungen beim Nachbau einer Leibniz-Rechenmaschine.” Studia Leibnitiana 36, no. 2 (2004): 130–46.Google Scholar

Bardi, Jason. The Calculus Wars: Newton, Leibniz and the Greatest Mathematical Clash of All Time. London: High Stakes, 2006.Google Scholar

Bardout, Jean-Christophe. “Johannes Clauberg.” In A Companion to Early Modern Philosophy. Ed. by Steven, Nadler. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002, pp. 129–39.Google Scholar

Barnett, Frances Mason. Medical Authority and Princely Patronage: The Academia Naturae Curiosorum, 1652–1693. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1995. (Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation.)Google Scholar

Becco, Anne. “Aux sources de la monade: Paléographie et lexicographie leibniziennes.” Les Études Philosophiques 3 (1975): 279–94.Google Scholar

Becco, Anne. “Leibniz et François-Mercure van Helmont: Bagatelle pour des monades.” In Magia Naturalis und die Entstehung der Modernen Naturwissenschaften. Symposion der Leibniz-Gesellschaft Hannover, 14. und 15. November 1975. Studia Leibnitiana Sonderheft, vol. 7. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1978, pp. 119–41.Google Scholar

Beck, Lewis White. Early German Philosophy: Kant and His Predecessors. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of the Harvard University Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Beeley, Philip. Kontinuität und Mechanismus. Zur Philosophie des jungen Leibniz in ihrem ideengeschichtlichen Kontext. Stuttgart: Steiner, 1996.Google Scholar

Beeley, Philip. “Mathematics and Nature in Leibniz's Early Philosophy.” In The Young Leibniz and His Philosophy, 1646–1676. Ed. by Stuart, Brown. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999, pp. 123–45.Google Scholar

Beeley, Philip. “A Philosophical Apprenticeship: Leibniz's Correspondence with the Secretary of the Royal Society, Henry Oldenburg.” In Leibniz and His Correspondents. Ed. by Paul, Lodge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 47–73.Google Scholar

Belaval, Yvon. “Premières animadversions de Leibniz sur les Principes de Descartes.” In Mélanges Alexandre Koyré t. II: l'Aventure de l'esprit. Paris: Hermann, 1964, pp. 29–56.Google Scholar

Belaval, Yvon. Leibniz: Initiation à sa philosophie. 3rd ed. Paris: Vrin, 1969.Google Scholar

Benz, Ernst. “Leibniz und Peter der Grosse,” 1947, pp. 1–88. Instalment 2 in Leibniz. Zu seinem 300. Geburtstage 1646–1946. Ed. by Erich, Hochstetter. Berlin: W. de Gruyter, 1946–1952. Instalments 1–8.Google Scholar

Berg, Wieland, and Benno, Parthier. “Die ‘kaiserliche’ Leopoldina im Heiligen Römischen Reich Deutscher Nation.” In Gelehrte Gesellschaften im mitteldeutschen Raum (1650–1820). Part I. Ed. by Detlef, Döring and Kurt, Nowak. Vol. 76, 2 of Abhandlungen der Sächsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig. Philologisch-historische Klasse. Leipzig: S. Hirzel, 2000, pp. 39–52.Google Scholar

Bergmann, J. “Leibniz als Reichshofrat in Wien und dessen Besoldung.” Sitzungsberichte der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Wien. Phil.–hist. Klasse. Vol. 26. Vienna, 1858. Fasc. I, pp. 187–215.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Howard. “Conatus, Hobbes, and the Young Leibniz.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 11 (1980): 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bertoloni Meli, Domenico. Equivalence and Priority: Newton versus Leibniz. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Bertoloni Meli, Domenico. “Caroline, Leibniz, and Clarke.” Journal of the History of Ideas 60, no. 3 (1999): 469–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bireley, R. A. “The Thirty Years War as Germany's Religious War.” In Krieg und Politik 1618–1648. Ed. by K., Repgen. Munich: R. Oldenbourg, 1988, pp. 85–106.Google Scholar

Blank, Andreas. “Incomplete Entities, Natural Non-separability, and Leibniz's Response to François Lamy's De la Connoissance de soi-mêmer.” The Leibniz Review 13 (2003): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boas Hall, Marie. “The Royal Society's Role in the Diffusion of Information in the Seventeenth Century.” Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 29 (1975): 173–192.Google Scholar

Boas Hall, Marie. “Leibniz and the Royal Society. 1670–76.” In Leibniz a Paris (1672–1676). Symposion de la G. W. Leibniz-Gesellschaft. 2 vols. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1978, vol. 1, pp. 171–82.Google Scholar

Bodéüs, R.Leibniz-Thomasius, Correspondance, 1663–1672. Paris: J. Vrin, 1993.Google Scholar

Boehm, Rudolf. “Notes sur l'histoire des ‘Principes de la nature et de la grâce’ et de la ‘Monadologie’ de Leibniz.” Revue philosophique de Louvain 55 (1957): 232–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Böger, Ines. “Der Spanheim-Kreis und seine Bedeutung für Leibniz' Akademieplane.” In Leibniz in Berlin. Ed. by Hans, Poser and Albert, Heinekamp. Stuttgart: Steiner, 1990, pp. 202–17.Google Scholar

Bos, H. J. M. “Differentials, Higher-Order Differentials and the Derivative in the Leibnizian Calculus.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 14 (1974): 1–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bos, H. J. M. “The Influence of Huygens on the Formation of Leibniz's Ideas.” In Leibniz a Paris (1672–1676). Symposion de la G. W. Leibniz-Gesellschaft. 2 vols. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1978, vol. 1, pp. 59–68.Google Scholar

Bradley Bassler, O. “Towards Paris: The Growth of Leibniz's Paris Mathematics out of the Pre-Paris Metaphysics.” Studia Leibnitiana 31, no. 2 (1999): 160–80.Google Scholar

Brambora, Josef. “Comenius und Leibniz.” In Akten des [I.] Internationalen Leibniz-Kongress Hannover, 14.–19. November 1966. Vol. 5. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1971, pp. 55–71.Google Scholar

Brather, Hans-Stephan. “Leibniz und das Konzil der Berliner Sozietät der Wissenschaften.” In Leibniz in Berlin. Ed. by Hans, Poser and Albert, Heinekamp. Stuttgart: Steiner, 1990, pp. 218–30.Google Scholar

Braubach, M.Prinz Eugen von Savoyen. Eine Biographie. 5 vols. Munich, 1963–1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breger, Herbert and Friedrich, Niewöhner, eds. Leibniz und Niedersachsen. Stuttgart: Steiner, 1999.

Brown, Gregory. “Personal, Political, and Philosophical Dimensions of the Leibniz–Caroline Correspondence.” In Leibniz and His Correspondents. Ed. by Paul, Lodge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 262–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Stuart. “Leibniz's New System Strategy.” In Leibniz's New System (1695). Ed. by Roger S., Woolhouse. Florence: Olschki, 1996, pp. 37–61.Google Scholar

Brown, Stuart. “The Proto-monadology of the De Summa Rerum.” In The Young Leibniz and His Philosophy, 1646–1676. Ed. by Stuart, Brown. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999, pp. 263–88.Google Scholar

Brown, Stuart. “The Leibniz–Toland Debates on Materialism and the Soul at the Court of the Queen of Prussia.” In Nihil sine Ratione. Mensch, Natur und Technik im Wirken von G. W. Leibniz. VII. Internationaler Leibniz-Kongress. Ed. by Hans, Poser. 3 vols. Berlin: Leibniz-Gesellschaft, 2001, vol. I, pp. 147–54.Google Scholar

Brown, Stuart. “The Leibniz–Foucher Alliance and Its Philosophical Bases.” In Leibniz and His Correspondents. Ed. by Paul, Lodge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 74–96.Google Scholar

Bruyère, Nelly. “Leibniz, lecteur de Ramus.” In Leibniz et la Renaissance. Ed. by Albert, Heinekamp. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1983, pp. 157–73.Google Scholar

Bruyère, Nelly. Méthode et dialectique dans l'oeuvre de la Ramée. Paris: J. Vrin, 1984.Google Scholar

Bussman, Klaus and Heinz, Schilling, eds. 1648: War and Peace in Europe. 3 vols. Munich: Bruckmann, 1998.

Burkhardt, H.Logik and Semiotik in der Philosophie von Leibniz. Munich: Philosophia Verlag, 1980.Google Scholar

Busche, Hubertus. “Die drei Stufen des Naturrechts und die Ableitung materialer Gerechtigkeitsnormen beim frühen Leibniz. Zur Vorgeschichte der ‘caritas sapientis.’” In Realität und Begriff. Ed. by Peter, Baumanns. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 1993, pp. 195–49.Google Scholar

Busche, Hubertus. Leibniz' Weg ins perspektivische Universum: Eine Harmonie im Zeitalter der Berechnung. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1997.Google Scholar

Carabelli, Giancarlo. Tolandiana. Materiali bibliografici per lo studio dell'opera e della fortuna di John Toland (1670–1722). Florence: La Nuova Italia, 1975.Google Scholar

Chaitin, Gregory. “Leibniz, Information, Math and Physics.” In Wissen und Glauben/Knowledge and Belief. Akten des 26. Internationalen Wittgenstein-Symposiums 2003. Ed. by Winfried, Löffler and Paul, Weingartner. Vienna: ÖBV & HPT, 2004, pp. 277–86.Google Scholar

Chaitin, Gregory. “Leibniz, Randomness and the Halting Probability.” Mathematics Today 40 (2004): 198–9.Google Scholar

Champion, Justin. Republican Learning: John Toland and the Crisis of Christian Culture, 1696–1722. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, Desmond. Descartes: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collani, Claudia von. “Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and the China Mission of the Jesuits.” In Das Neueste über China. Ed. by Wenchao, Li and Hans, Poser. Stuttgart: Steiner, 2000, pp. 89–103.Google Scholar

Conze, Werner. Leibniz als Histonker. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1951.Google Scholar

Cook, Alan. “Leibniz and the Royal Society.” Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 50, no. 2 (1996): 153–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coudert, Allison P.Leibniz and the Kabbalah. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Couturat, Louis. La logique de Leibniz. Paris, 1901. Reprint, Hildesheim: Olms, 1969.Google Scholar

Cover, J. A. and John, O'Leary-Hawthorne. Substance and Individuation in Leibniz. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cranston, Maurice. John Locke. A Biography. London: Longmans, 1957.Google Scholar

Davídek, V. “G. W. Leibniz oriundus Lipnicky.” Revue internationale d'onomastique 17 (1965): 93–8.Google Scholar

Davillé, Louis. Leibniz historien. Paris: Félix Alcan, 1909.Google Scholar

De Melo, Wolfgang David Cirilo and James, Cussens. “Leibniz on Estimating the Uncertain: An English Translation of De incerti aestimatione with Commentary.” The Leibniz Review 14 (2004): 31–53.Google Scholar

De Risi, Vincenzo. The Analysis Situs 1712–1716. Geometry and Philosophy of Space in the Late Leibniz. Pisa, 2005 (Ph.D. dissertation). Revised version published under the title Geometry and Monadology: Leibniz's Analysis Situs and Philosophy of Space. Basel, Boston, and Berlin: Birkhauser, 2007.Google Scholar

Distel, Theodor, ed. “Vorlegung einer Abschrift der in dem Hauptstaatsarchive zu Dresden befindlichen Briefe von Leibniz.” In Berichte über die Verhandlungen der Königlich Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig. Philologisch-Historische Classe. Leipzig, 1879, vol. 31, pp. 194–54; “Nachtrag.” Leipzig, 1880, vol. 32, pp. 187–9.

Döring, Detlef. Der junge Leibniz und Leipzig: Ausstellung zum 350. Geburtstag von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz im Leipziger Alten Rathaus. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1996.Google Scholar

Dohmke, Emil. “Die Nikolaischule zu Leipzig im siebzehnten Jahrhundert.” In Programm des Nicolaigymnasiums in Leipzig. Leipzig: Edelmann, 1874, pp. 1–43.Google Scholar

Drischler, William Fr.The Political Biography of the Young Leibniz in The Age of Secret Diplomacy. Charleston, SC: BookSurge Publ., 2006.Google Scholar

Duchesneau, François. Leibnizet la méthode de la science. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1993.Google Scholar

Duchesneau, François. La dynamique de Leibniz. Paris: Vrin, 1994.Google Scholar

Duchesneau, François. “Leibniz's Theoretical Shift in the ‘Phoranomus and dynamica de potentia.’” Perspectives on Science 6, nos. 1–2 (spring–summer 1998): 77–109.Google Scholar

Duchesneau, François. Les modèles du vivant de Descartes à Leibniz. Paris: J. Vrin, 1998.Google Scholar

Dürr, Karl. Neue Beleuchtung einer Theorie von Leibniz. Grundzüge des Logikkalküls. Darmstadt: Reichl, 1930.Google Scholar

Eisenkopf, Paul. Leibniz und die Einigung der Christenheit. Überlegungen zur Reunion der evangelischen und katholischen Kirche. Munich, Paderborn, and Vienna: Schoningh, 1975.Google Scholar

Erler, Georg. Die jüngere Matrikel der Universität Leipzig (1559–1809). 3 vols. Leipzig: Giesecke and Devrient, 1909.Google Scholar

Eulenburg, Franz. Die Frequenz der deutschen Universitäten. Leipzig, 1904; repr. Berlin, 1994.Google Scholar

Faak, M.Leibniz als Reichshofrat. Humboldt-Universität Berlin, 1966 (Phil. Dissertation, typewr.)Google Scholar

Fichant, Michel. “Actiones sunt suppositorum. L'ontologie Leibnizienne de l'action.” Philosophie 53 (1997): 135–48.Google Scholar

Fichant, Michel. “De la puissance à l'action: La singularite stylistiqué de la dynamique.” In Michel, Fichant, Science et métaphysique dans Descartes et Leibniz. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1998, pp. 205–43.Google Scholar

Fichant, Michel. “Leibniz et l'exigence de demonstration des axiomes: ‘La partie est plus petite que le Tout’.” In Michel, Fichant, Science et métaphysique dans Descartes et Leibniz. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1998, pp. 329–73.Google Scholar

Fichant, Michel. “Mécanisme et métaphysique: Le rétablissement des formes substantielles. (1679).” In Michel, Fichant, Science et métaphysique dans Descartes et Leibniz. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1998, pp. 163–204.Google Scholar

Fichant, Michel. “La costituzione del concetto di monade.” In Monadi e monadologie. Il mondo degli individui tra Bruno, Leibniz e Husserl. Ed. by Bianca Maria, d'Ippolito, Aniello, Montano, and Francesco, Piro. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino, 2005, pp. 59–81.Google Scholar

Findlen, Paula, ed. Athanasius Kircher. The Last Man Who Knew Everything. New York and London: Routledge, 2004.

Fischer, Kuno. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Leben, Werke und Lehre. 4th ed. Heidelberg: Winter, 1902.Google Scholar

Fischer, Rudolph. “Der Name Leibniz.” In Leipziger Namenkundliche Beiträge II. Berlin, 1968 (Sitzungsberichte der Sächsischen Akademie des Wiss. Vol. 113. Issue 4), pp. 7–18.Google Scholar

Foucher de Careil, Alexandre. Mémoire sur la philosophie de Leibniz. Paris: F. R. de Rudeval, 1905.Google Scholar

Fouke, Daniel C. “Metaphysics and the Eucharist in the Early Leibniz.” Studia Leibnitiana 24 (1992): 195–59.Google Scholar

François, E. “Géographie du livre et réseau urbain dans l'Allemagne moderne.” In La Ville et l'innovation. Paris, 1987, pp. 59–74.Google Scholar

Franke, Ursula. “Die Freiheit eines Christenmenschen. Streitgespräch zwischen Leibniz und Jaquelot in der Spannung von Vernunft und Glauben.” In Leibniz in Berlin. Ed. by Hans, Poser and Albert, Heinekamp. Stuttgart: Steiner, 1990, pp. 103–19.Google Scholar

Fransen, P.Leibniz und die Friedensschlüsse von Utrecht und Rastatt-Baden. Eine aus größtenteils noch nicht veröffentlichten Quellen geschöpfte Untersuchung. Purmerend (Holland): Muusses, 1933.Google Scholar

Freudenthal, J.Die Lebensgeschichte Spinoza's in Quellenschriften, Urkunden und Nichtamtlichen Nachrichten. Leipzig: Verlag Von Veit, 1899.Google Scholar

Friedberg, Emil. Die Leipziger Juristenfakultat, ihre Doktoren und ihr Heim, 1409–1909. Leipzig, 1909.Google Scholar

Friedmann, G.Leibniz et Spinoza. 2nd ed. Paris: Gallimard, 1962.Google Scholar

Frost, Robert I.The Northern Wars. 1558–1721. Harlow: Longman, 2000.Google Scholar

Garber, Daniel. “Motion and Metaphysics in the Young Leibniz.” In Leibniz: Critical and Interpretative Essays. Ed. by Michael, Hooker. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1982, pp. 160–84.Google Scholar

Garber, Daniel. “Leibniz and the Foundations of Physics: The Middle Years.” In The Natural Philosophy of Leibniz. Ed. by Kathleen, Okruhlik and James Robert, Brown. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1985, pp. 27–130.Google Scholar

Garber, Daniel. “Leibniz: Physics and Philosophy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz. Ed. by Nicholas, Jolley. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 270–352.Google Scholar

Garber, Daniel. “Leibniz and Fardella. Body, Substance, and Idealism.” In Leibniz and His Correspondents. Ed. by Paul, Lodge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 123–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garber, Daniel. Enchanting the World: Leibniz on Body, Substance and Monad. Oxford: Oxford University Press (Provisional title; Forthcoming.)

Gaukroger, Stephen. Descartes: An Intellectual Biography. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Gensini, Stefano. Il naturale e il simbolico. Saggio su Leibniz. Rome: Bulzoni, 1991.Google Scholar

Gensini, Stefano. “Leibniz Linguist and Philosopher of Language: Between ‘Primitive’ and ‘Natural’.” In Leibniz and Adam. Ed. by Marcelo, Dascal and Elhanan, Yakira. Tel Aviv: University Publishing Projects Ltd., 1993, pp. 111–36.Google Scholar

Gerber, Georg. “Leibniz und seine Korrespondenz.” In Leibniz. Sein Leben, sein Wirken, seine Welt. Ed. by W., Totok and C., Haase. Hanover: Verlag für Literatur und Zeitgeschehen, 1966, pp. 141–71.Google Scholar

Giuntini, Chiara. Panteismo e ideologia repubblicana: John Toland (1670–1722). Bologna: Il Mulino, 1979.Google Scholar

Giusti, Enrico. “Le Problème des tangentes de Descartes à Leibniz.” In 300 Jahre “Nova Methodus” von G. W. Leibniz (1684–1984). Symposion der Leibniz-Gesellschaft … 28. bis 30. August 1984. Ed. by Albert, Heinekamp. Stuttgart: Steiner, 1986, pp. 26–37.Google Scholar

Görlich, Ekkehard. Leibniz als Mensch und Kranker. Hanover, 1987. (Dissertation for the Doctorate in Medicine, typewr.)Google Scholar

Goldenbaum, Ursula. “Leibniz as a Lutheran.” In Leibniz, Mysticism and Religion. Ed. by Allison P., Coudert, Richard H., Popkin, and Gordon M., Weiner. Kluwer: Dordrecht, 1998, pp. 169–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldenbaum, Ursula. “Die Commentatiuncula de judice als Leibnizens erste philosophische Auseinandersetzung mit Spinoza nebst der Mitteilung über ein neuaufgefundenes Leibnizstuck.” In Labora Diligenter. Ed. by M., Fontiuset al.Stuttgart: Steiner, 1999, pp. 61–107.Google Scholar

Goldenbaum, Ursula. “Transubstantiation, Physics and Philosophy at the Time of the Catholic Demonstrations.” In The Young Leibniz and His Philosophy, 1646–1676. Ed. by Stuart, Brown. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999, pp. 79–102.Google Scholar

Gotthard, Axel. “‘Politice seint wir bapstisch’: Kursachsen und der deutschen Protestantismus im frühen 17 Jahrhundert.” Zeitschrift für Historische Forschung 20 (1993): 275–319.Google Scholar

Gottschalk, Jürgen. “Der Oberharzer Bergbau und Leibniz' Tätigkeit für Verbesserungen.” In Leibniz und Niedersachsen. Ed. by Herbert, Breger and Friedrich, Niewöhner. Stuttgart: Steiner, 1999, pp. 173–86.Google Scholar

Grote, Ludwig. Leibniz und seine Zeit. Hanover, 1869.Google Scholar

Grotefend, Karl L.Leibniz-Album aus den Handschriften der Königlichen Bibliothek zu Hannover. Hanover: Hahnschen Hofbuchhandlung, 1846.Google Scholar

Grua, Gaston. Jurisprudence universelle et Théodicée selon Leibniz. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1953.Google Scholar

Grua, Gaston. La Justice humaine selon Leibniz. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1956.Google Scholar

Guicciardini, Niccolò. Reading the Principia. The Debate on Newton's Mathematical Methods for Natural Philosophy from 1687 to 1736. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guicciardini, Niccolo. “Newton's Method and Leibniz's Calculus.” In A History of Analysis. Ed. by Hans Niels, Jahnke. History of Mathematics, vol. 24. Providence: American Mathematical Society, 2003, pp. 73–103.Google Scholar

Hall, Rupert. “Leibniz and the British Mathematicians.” In Leibniz à Paris (1672–1676). Symposion de la G. W. Leibniz-Gesellschaft. 2 vols. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1978, vol. 1, pp. 131–52.Google Scholar

Hall, Rupert. Philosophers at War. The Quarrel between Newton and Leibniz. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harnack, Adolf. Geschichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin. 4 vols. Berlin, 1900.Google Scholar

Hartmann, Fritz, and Wolfgang, Hense. “Die Stellung der Medizin in Leibniz' Entwürfen für Sozietäten.” In Leibniz in Berlin. Ed. by Hans, Poser and Albert, Heinekamp. Stuttgart: Steiner, 1990, pp. 241–52.Google Scholar

Heinekamp, Albert. Das Problem des Guten bei Leibniz. Bonn: H. Bouvier u. Co. Verlag, 1969.Google Scholar

Heinekamp, Albert. “Ars Characteristica und Natürliche Sprache bei Leibniz.” Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 34, no. 3 (1972): 446–88.Google Scholar

Heinekamp, Albert, ed. 300 Jahre “Nova Methodus” von G. W. Leibniz (1684–1984). Symposion der Leibniz-Gesellschaft … 28. bis 30. August 1984. Stuttgart: Steiner, 1986.

Heinekamp, Albert. “Das Glück als höchstes Gut in Leibniz' Philosophie.” In The Leibniz Renaissance. International Workshop (Firenze 1986). Florence: Olschki, 1988, pp. 99–125.Google Scholar

Heinemann, F. H. “Toland and Leibniz.” The Philosophical Review 54, no. 5 (1945): 437–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heinemann, O. von. Die Herzogliche Bibliothek zu Wolfenbüttel. 2nd ed. Wolfenbüttel: Zwissler, 1894.Google Scholar

Hertrampf, Hans-Dieter. “Höe von Höenegg- Sächsischer Oberhofprediger 1613–1645.” Herbergen der Christenheit. Jahrbuch für deutschen Kirchengeschichte. [= Beiträge zur Kirchengeschichte Deutschlands, vol. 7] Berlin, 1969, pp. 129–48.Google Scholar

Hess, Heinz-Jürgen. “Die unveröffentlichten naturwissenschaftlichen und technischen Arbeiten von G. W. Leibniz aus der Zeit seines Parisaufenthaltes. Eine Kurzcharakteristik.” In Leibniz à Paris (1672–1676). Symposion de la G. W. Leibniz-Gesellschaft. 2 vols. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1978, vol. I, pp. 183–217.Google Scholar

Hess, Heinz-Jürgen, ed. Der Ausbau des Calculus durch Leibniz und die Brüder Bernoulli: Symposion der Leibniz-Gesellschaft und der Bernoulli-Edition der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Basel, 15.–17. Juni 1987. Stuttgart, 1989.

Heuvel, Gerd van den. “Leibniz zwischen Hannover und Berlin.” In Leibniz in Berlin. Ed. by Hans, Poser and Albert, Heinekamp. Stuttgart: Steiner, 1990, pp. 271–80.Google Scholar

Hill, C.Intellectual Origins of the English Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Hiltebrandt, Ph. “Eine Relation des Wiener Nuntius über seine Verhandlungen mit Leibniz (1700).” In Quellen und Forschungen aus italienischen Archiven und Bibliotheken. Vol. 10. Rome, 1907, pp. 238–46.Google Scholar

Hofmann, J. E. “Vom öffentlichen Bekanntwerden der Leibnizschen Infinitesimalmathematik.” In Sitzungsberichte d. Österr. Akad. d. Wiss. Mathem.-naturw. Kl. Section II. 175, nos. 8–9 (1966): 209–54.Google Scholar

Hofmann, J. E.Leibniz in Paris 1672–1676. His Growth to Mathematical Maturity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Hotson, Howard. “Leibniz and Millenarianism.” In Maria Rosa, Antognazza and Howard, Hotson, eds. Alsted and Leibniz on God, the Magistrate and the Millennium. Texts edited with introduction and commentary. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 1999, pp. 127–214.Google Scholar

Hotson, Howard. “A Dark Golden Age: The Thirty Years War and the Universities of Northern Europe.” In Ships, Guns and Bibles in the North Sea and Baltic States, c. 1350–c. 1700. Ed. by Allan I., Macinnes, Thomas, Riis, and Frederik, Pedersen. East Linton: Tuckwell Press, 2000, pp. 235–70.Google Scholar

Hotson, Howard. Johann Heinrich Alsted 1588–1638: Between Renaissance, Reformation, and Universal Reform. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hotson, Howard. “Irenicism in the Confessional Age: The Holy Roman Empire, 1563–1648.” In Conciliation and Confession: Struggling for Unity in the Age of Reform. Ed. by Howard, Louthan and Randall, Zachman. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2004, pp. 228–85.Google Scholar

Hotson, Howard. Commonplace Learning: Ramism and Its German Ramifications, 1543–1630. Oxford-Warburg Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Hotson, Howard. The Reformation of Common Learning: Post-Ramist Method and the Reception of the New Philosophy, 1618–1670. Oxford-Warburg Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.

Hüber, Kurt. Leibniz. Munich: Oldenbourg, 1951.Google Scholar

Hübener, Wolfgang. “Leibniz und der Renaissance-Lullismus.” In Leibniz et la Renaissance. Ed. by Albert, Heinekamp. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1983, pp. 103–12.Google Scholar

Hübener, Wolfgang. “Negotium irenicum. Leibniz' Bemühungen um die brandenburgische Union.” In Leibniz in Berlin. Ed. by Hans, Poser and Albert, Heinekamp. Stuttgart: Steiner, 1990, pp. 120–69.Google Scholar

Hutton, Sarah. Anne Conway. A Woman Philosopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iltis, C. “Leibniz and the Vis Viva Controversy.” Isis 62, no. 1 (1971): 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Israel, Jonathan I.Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity, 1650–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Israel, Jonathan I.Enlightenment Contested: Philosophy, Modernity, and the Emancipation of Man, 1670–1752. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacob, Margaret C.The Newtonians and the English Revolution. 1689–1710. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Jolley, Nicholas. “Leibniz on Locke and Socinianism.” Journal of the History of Ideas 39, no. 2 (1978): 233–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jolley, Nicholas. Leibniz and Locke: A Study of the New Essays on Human Understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Jolley, Nicholas. Letbntz. London and New York: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar

Joly, Henri. “Thomasius et l'Universite de Leipzig pendant la jeunesse de Leibniz.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l'étranger 6 (1878): 482–500.Google Scholar

Jordan, G. J.The Reunion of the Churches: A Study of G. W. Leibnitz and His Great Attempt. London: Constable & Co., 1927.Google Scholar

Jürgensmeier, F.Johann Philipp von Schönborn (1605–1673) und die römische Kurie. Mainz: Selbstverlag der Gesellschaft für mittelrheinische Kirchengeschichte, 1977.Google Scholar

Junge, W.Leibniz und der Sachsen-Lauenburgische Erbfolgestreit. Quellen und Darstellungen zur Geschichte Niedersachsens, vol. 65. Hildesheim, 1965.Google Scholar

Kabitz, Willy. Die Philosophie des jungen Leibniz. Untersuchungen zur Entwicklungsgeschichte seines Systems. Heidelberg: Carl Winter's Universitätsbuchhandlung, 1909.Google Scholar

Kabitz, Willy. “Die Bildungsgeschichte des jungen Leibniz.” Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Erziehung und des Unterrichts 2 (1912): 164–84.Google Scholar

Kabitz, Willy. “Leibniz und Berkeley.” Sitzungsberichte der preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Philosophisch-historische Klasse 24 (1932): 623–36.Google Scholar

Kauppi, R.Über die Leübmzsche Logik. Helsinki: Societas philosophica, 1960.Google Scholar

Kiefl, Franz Xaver. Der Friedensplan des Leibniz zur Wiedervereinigung der getrennten christlichen Kirchen aus seinen Verhandlungen mit dem Hofe Ludwigs XIV., Leopolds I. und Peters des Großen. Paderborn: Schöningh, 1903; 2nd ed. Leibniz und die religiöse Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands. Regensburg, 1925.Google Scholar

Knapp, Hans. Matthias Hoe von Hoenegg und sein Eingreiffen in die Politik und Publizistik des dreissigjährigen Krieges. Halle, 1902.Google Scholar

Koenigsberger, H. G.The Habsburgs and Europe, 1516–1660. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Korthaase, Werner, Sigurd, Hauff and Andreas, Fritsch, eds. Comenius und der Weltfriede. Berlin: Deutsche Comenius-Gesellschaft, 2005.

Knobloch, Eberhard. “Die Entscheidende Abhandlung von Leibniz zur Theorie linearer Gleichungssysteme.” Studia Leibnitiana 4 (1972): 163–80.Google Scholar

Knobloch, Eberhard. “Studien von Leibniz zum Determinanten Kalkül.” Studia Leibnitiana Supplementa 13 (1974): 37–45.Google Scholar

Knobloch, Eberhard. Der Beginn der Determinantentheorie. Hildesheim: Gerstenberg, 1980.Google Scholar

Knobloch, Eberhard. “Zur Vorgeschichte der Determinantentheorie.” Studia Leibnitiana Supplementa 22 (1982): 96–118.Google Scholar

Knobloch, Eberhard. “Die Astronomie an der Sozietät der Wissenschaften.” In Leibniz in Berlin. Ed. by Hans, Poser and Albert, Heinekamp. Stuttgart: Steiner, 1990, pp. 231–40.Google Scholar

Knopf, Sabine, and Volker, Titel. Der Leipzig Gutenbergweg. Geschichte und Topographie einer Buchstadt. Leipzig: Sax-Verlag Beucha, 2001.

Kroker, Ernst. “Leibnizens Vorfahren.” Neues Archiv für Sächsische Geschichte 19 (1898): 315–38.Google Scholar

Kroll, M.Sophie, Electress of Hanover: A Personal Portrait. London, 1973.Google Scholar

Kulstad, Mark. Leibniz on Apperception, Consciousness, and Reflection. Munich: Philosophia, 1991.Google Scholar

Kulstad, Mark. “Exploring Middle Ground: Was Leibniz's Conception of God Ever Spinozistic?” Americam Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76, no. 4 (2002): 671–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lach, D.The Preface to Leibniz' Novissima Sinica. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Lackmann, Heinrich. “Leibniz' Bibliothekarische Tätigkeit in Hannover.” In Leibniz. Sein Leben, sein Wirken, seine Welt. Ed. by W., Totok and C., Haase. Hanover: Verlag für Literatur und Zeitgeschehen, 1966, pp. 321–48.Google Scholar

Lackmann, Heinrich. “Der Erbschaftsstreit um Leibniz' Privatbibliothek.” Studia Leibnitiana 1, no. 1 (1969): 126–36.Google Scholar

Lamarra, Antonio. “The Development of the Theme of the ‘Logica Inventiva’ during the Stay of Leibniz in Paris.” Leibniz à Paris (1672–1676). Symposion de la G. W. Leibniz-Gesellschaft. 2 vols. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1978, vol. 2, pp. 55-71.Google Scholar

Lamarra, Antonio, Roberto, Palaia, and Pietro, Pimpinella. Le prime traduzioni della Monadologie di Leibniz (1720–1721). Florence: Olschki, 2001.Google Scholar

Lampe, Joachim. Aristokratie, Hofadel und Staatspatriziat in Kurhannover. 1714–1760. Göttingen, 1963.Google Scholar

Leinkauf, Thomas. Mundus combinatus: Studien zur Struktur der barocken Universalwissenschaft am Beispiel Athanasius Kirchers SJ (1602–1680). Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar

Leinsle, Ulrich G.Reformversuche protestantischer Metaphysik im Zeitalter des Rationalismus. Augsburg: Maro Verlag, 1988.Google Scholar

Lenzen, Wolfgang. Calculus Universalis: Studien zur Logik von G. W. Leibniz. Paderborn: Mentis, 2004.Google Scholar

Leube, Hans. Kalvinismus und Luthertum im Zeitalter der Orthodoxie. Leipzig: A. Deichert, 1928.Google Scholar

Lewalter, E.Spanisch-jesuitische und deutsch-lutherische Metaphysik des 17. Jahrhunderts. Hamburg, 1935.Google Scholar

Lewis, Rhodri. Language, Mind and Nature. Artificial Languages in England from Bacon to Locke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Lynn, John A.The Wars of Louis XIV. Harlow: Longman, 1999.Google Scholar

Lodge, Paul. “The Failure of Leibniz's Correspondence with De Volder.” The Leibniz Review 8 (1998): 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lodge, Paul. “Leibniz's Close Encounter with Cartesianism in the Correspondence with De Volder.” In Leibniz and His Correspondents. Ed. by Paul, Lodge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 162–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lodge, Paul. “Burchard de Volder: Crypto-Spinozist or Disenchanted Cartesian?” In Receptions of Descartes: Cartesianism and Anti-Cartesianism in Early Modern Europe. Ed. by Tad M., Schmaltz. London: Routledge, 2005, pp. 128–146.Google Scholar

Lodge, Paul. “Garber's Interpretation of Leibniz on Corporeal Substance in the ‘Middle Years.’” The Leibniz Review 15 (2005): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loemker, E. “Boyle and Leibniz.” Journal of the History of Ideas 16, no. 1 (1955): 22–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Look, Brandon. Leibniz and the ‘Vinculum Substantiale.’Stuttgart: Steiner, 1999.Google Scholar

Look, Brandon. “On Substance and Relation in Leibniz's Correspondence with Des Bosses.” In Leibniz and His Correspondents. Ed. by Paul, Lodge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 238–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malcolm, Noel and Jacqueline, Stedall. John Pell (1611–1685) and His Correspondence with Sir Charles Cavendish. The Mental World of an Early Modern Mathematician. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Malortie, C. E. von. Der Hannoversche Hof unter dem Kurfürsten Ernst August und der Kurfürstin Sophie. Hannover: Hahn, 1847.Google Scholar

Masser, Karin. Christobal de Gentil de Rojas y Spinola O.F.M. und der lutherische Abt Gerardus Wolterius Molanus: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Unionsbestrebungen der katholischen und evangelischen Kirche im 17. Jahrhundert. Münster: Aschendorff, 2002.Google Scholar

Mathieu, Vittorio. Leibniz e Des Bosses (1706–1716). Turin: Giapichelli, 1960.Google Scholar

Mathieu, Vittorio. “Introduzione.” In G. W., Leibniz, Teodicea. Bologna: Zanichelli, 1973, pp. 3–56.Google Scholar

Matzat, Heinz-L. “Die Gedankenwelt des jungen Leibniz.” In Beiträge zur Leibniz-Forschung. Ed. by G., Schischkoff. Reutlingen: Gryphius-Verlag, 1947, pp. 37–67.Google Scholar

McIntyre, J. Lewis. Giordano Bruno. London: Macmillan, 1903.Google Scholar

Meier, Ernst von. Hannoversche Verfassungs- und Verwaltungsgeschichte. 1680–1866. Leipzig, 1898–1899.Google Scholar

Menk, Gerhard. Die Hohe Schule Herborn in ihrer Frühzeit (1584–1660): Ein Beitrag zum Hochschulwesen des deutschen Kalvinismus im Zeitalter der Gegenreformation. Wiesbaden: Selbstverlag der Historischen Kommission für Nassau, 1981.Google Scholar

Merkel, F. R.G. W. Leibniz und die China-Mission. Leipzig: Hinrichs, 1920.Google Scholar

Merchant, C. “The Vitalism of Anne Conway: Its Impact on Leibniz's Concept of the Monad.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 17, no. 3 (1979): 255–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mercer, Christia. “The Seventeenth-Century Debate between the Moderns and the Aristotelians: Leibniz and Philosophia Reformata.” Studia Leibnitiana Supplementa 27 (1990): 18–29.Google Scholar

Mercer, Christia. “Mechanizing Aristotle: Leibniz and Reformed Philosophy.” In Studies in Seventeenth-Century European Philosophy. Ed. by M. A., Stewart. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997, pp. 117–52.Google Scholar

Mercer, Christia. “The Young Leibniz and His Teachers.” In The Young Leibniz and His Philosophy, 1646–1676. Ed. by Stuart, Brown. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999, pp. 19–40.Google Scholar

Mercer, Christia. “Clauberg, Corporeal Substance, and the German Response.” In Johannes Clau;berg. Ed. by T., Verbeek. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999, pp. 147–59.Google Scholar

Mercer, Christia. Leibniz's Metaphysics: Its Origins and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mercer, Christia. “Leibniz and His Master. The Correspondence with Jakob Thomasius.” In Leibniz and His Correspondents. Ed. by Paul, Lodge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 10–46.Google Scholar

Mercer, Christia and R. C., Sleigh Jr. “Metaphysics: The Early Period to the Discourse on Metaphysics.” In The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz. Ed. by Nicholas, Jolley. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 67–123.Google Scholar

Mesnard, Jean. “Leibniz et les papiers de Pascal.” Leibniz à Paris (1672–1676). Symposion de la G. W. Leibniz-Gesellschaft. 2 vols. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1978, vol. 1, pp. 45–58.Google Scholar

Mikkeli, Heikki. An Aristotelian Response to Renaissance Humanism: Jacopo Zabarella on the Nature of Arts and Sciences. Helsinki, 1992.Google Scholar

Mittelstraß, Jürgen. “Der Philosoph und die Königin – Leibniz und Sophie Charlotte.” In Leibniz in Berlin. Ed. by Hans, Poser and Albert, Heinekamp. Stuttgart: Steiner, 1990, pp. 9–27.Google Scholar

Moll, Konrad. Der junge Leibniz. 3 vols. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1978–1996.Google Scholar

Mondadori, Fabrizio. “A Harmony of One's Own and Universal Harmony.” Leibniz à Paris (1672–1676). Symposion de la G. W. Leibniz-Gesellschaft. 2 vols. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1978, vol. 2, pp. 151–68.Google Scholar

Mormino, Gianfranco. Determinismo e Utilitarismo nella Teodicea di Leibniz. Milan: FrancoAngeli, 2005.Google Scholar

Moss, Ann. Printed Commonplace-Books and the Structuring of Renaissance Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Most, G. W. “Zur Entwicklung von Leibniz' Specimen Dynamicum.” In Leibniz' Dynamica. Ed. by Albert, Heinekamp. Studia Leibnitiana Sonderheft, vol. 13. Wiesbaden: Steiner, pp. 148–63.

Mugnai, Massimo. “Der Begriff der Harmonie als metaphysische Grundlage der Logik und Kombinatorik bei Johann Heinrich Bisterfeld und Leibniz.” Studia Leibnitiana 5 (1973): 43–73.Google Scholar

Mugnai, Massimo. Astrazione e realta. Saggio su Leibniz. Milan: Feltrinelli, 1976.Google Scholar

Mugnai, Massimo. Leibniz' Theory of Relations. Stuttgart: Steiner, 1992.Google Scholar

Mugnai, Massimo. Introduzione alla filosofia di Leibniz. Turin: Einaudi, 2001.Google Scholar

Mugnai, Massimo. “Leibniz on Individuation: From the Early Years to the ‘Discourse’ and Beyond.” In Studia Leibnitiana 33 (2001): 36–54.Google Scholar

Mugnai, Massimo. “Leibniz: Vita di un genio tra logica, matematica e filosofia.” Le Scienze 5, no. 29 (2002): 1–103.Google Scholar

Mugnai, Massimo. “Review of Lenzen, Calculus Universalis, 2004.” The Leibniz Review 15 (2005): 169–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murray, Michael J. “Leibniz's Proposal for Theological Reconciliation among the Protestants.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76, no. 4 (2002): 623–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nadler, Steven. Spinoza: A Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nadler, Steven, ed. A Companion to Early Modern Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002.

Nischan, Bodo. “Reformed Irenicism and the Leipzig Colloquy of 1631.” Central European History 9 (1976): 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nischan, Bodo. Prince, People, and Confession: The Second Reformation in Brandenburg. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nunziante, Antonio-Maria. Organismo come armonia. La genesi del concetto di organismo vivente in G. W. Leibniz. Trento: Verifiche, 2002.Google Scholar

Oestreich, Gerhard. Verfassungsgeschichte vom Ende des Mittelalters bis zum Ende des alten Reiches. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Verlag, 1970.Google Scholar

Ohnsorge, T. H. “Leibniz als Staatsbediensteter.” In Leibniz. Sein Leben, sein Wirken, seine Welt. Ed. by W., Totok and C., Haase. Hanover: Verlag für Literatur und Zeitgeschehen, 1966, pp. 173–94.Google Scholar

Olgiati, Francesco. Il significato storico di Leibniz. Milan: Vita e Pensiero, 1929.Google Scholar

Ong, S. J. Walter. Ramus and Talon Inventory: A Short-Title Inventory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Otto, Rüdiger. “Leibniz' Aktivitäten für die sachsen-lauenburgische Erbfolge.” In Leibniz und Niedersachsen. Ed. by Herbert, Breger and Friedrich, Niewöhner. Stuttgart: Steiner, 1999, pp. 53–75.Google Scholar

Palaia, Roberto. “Naturbegriff und Kraftbegriff im Briefwechsel zwischen Leibniz und Sturm.” In Leibniz' Auseinandersetzung mit Vorgangern und Zeitgenossen. Ed. by Ingrid, Marchlewitz and Albert, Heinekamp. Stuttgart: Steiner, 1990, pp. 157–72.Google Scholar

Palaia, Roberto. “Unità metodologica e molteplicità disciplinare nella Nova Methodus Discendae Docendaeque Jurisprudentiae.” In Unità e Molteplicità nel Pensiero Filosofico e Scientifico di Leibniz. Ed. by Antonio, Lamarra and Roberto, Palaia. Florence: Olschki, 2000, pp. 143–57.Google Scholar

Papineau, David. “The Vis Viva Controversy.” In Leibniz: Metaphysics and Philosophy of Science. Ed. by R. S., Woolhouse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981, pp. 139–56.Google Scholar

Parker, Geoffrey, ed. The Thirty Years War. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar

Parkinson, G. H. R. “Leibniz's Paris Writings in Relation to Spinoza.” In Leibniz à Paris (1672–1676). Symposion de la G. W. Leibniz-Gesellschaft. 2 vols. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1978, vol. 2, pp. 73–89.Google Scholar

Parkinson, G. H. R. “Sufficient Reason and Human Freedom in the Confessio Philosophi.” In The Young Leibniz and His Philosophy, 1646–1676. Ed. by Stuart, Brown. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999, pp. 199–222.Google Scholar

Parkinson, G. H. R. “Review of Leibniz, Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe, vol. VI, 4.” Studia Leibnitiana 31, no. 1 (1999): 109–22.Google Scholar

Pasini, Enrico. Il reale e l'immaginario: La fondazione del calcolo infinitesimale nel pensiero di Leibniz. Turin: Sonda, 1993.Google Scholar

Pasini, Enrico. Corpo e funzioni cognitive in Leibniz. Milan: Angeli, 1996.Google Scholar

Pasini, Enrico. “Cinque storie sulla Monadologia di Leibniz.” In Monadi e monadologie. Il mondo degli individui tra Bruno, Leibniz e Husserl. Ed. by Bianca Maria, d'Ippolito, Aniello, Montano, and Francesco, Piro. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino, 2005, pp. 147–67.Google Scholar

Perkins, Franklin. “The Theoretical Basis of Comparative Philosophy in Leibniz' Writings on China.” In Das Neueste über China. Ed. by Wenchao, Li and Hans, Poser. Stuttgart: Steiner, 2000, pp. 275–93.Google Scholar

Perkins, Franklin. Leibniz and China. A Commerce of Light. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perkins, Franklin. “Leibniz's Exchange with the Jesuits in China.” In Leibniz and His Correspondents. Ed. by Paul, Lodge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 141–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petersen, P.Geschichte der aristotelischen Philosophie im protestantischen Deutschland. Leipzig: Verlag Felix Meiner, 1921.Google Scholar

Phemister, Pauline. “Leibniz and the Elements of Compound Bodies.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 7, no. 1 (1999): 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phemister, Pauline. “‘All the time and everywhere everything's the same as here’: The Principle of Uniformity in the Correspondence between Leibniz and Lady Masham.” In Leibniz and His Correspondents. Ed. by Paul, Lodge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 193–213.Google Scholar

Phemister, Pauline. Leibniz and the Natural World. Activity, Passivity and Corporeal Substances in Leibniz's Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer, 2005.Google Scholar

Pichler, Aloys. Die Theologie des Leibniz. 2 vols. Munich: Cotta, 1869–1870.Google Scholar

Piro, Francesco. “Jus – Justum – Justitia. Etica e Diritto nel giovane Leibniz.” Annali dell'Instituto Italiano per gli Studi Storici 7 (1981/1982): 1–54.Google Scholar

Piro, Francesco. Varietas identitate compensata. Studio sulla formazione della metafisica di Leibniz. Naples: Bibliopolis, 1990.Google Scholar

Piro, Francesco. “Leibniz and Ethics: The Years 1669–72.” In The Young Leibniz and His Philosophy, 1646–1676. Ed. by Stuart, Brown. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999, pp. 147–67.Google Scholar

Piro, Francesco. Spontaneità e ragion sufficiente. Determinismo e filosofia dell'azione in Leibniz. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 2002.Google Scholar

Platzeck, E. W. “Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz y Raimundo Llull.” Estudios Lulianos 16, nos. 2–3 (1972): 1–193.Google Scholar